Reviewers Comment
1
REVIEWER’S COMMENT: Reply 1) Read the paper properly and correct typos. Necessary typos have been corrected in the paper wherever necessary. 2) Figure 5 is not there in the paper. It is typographical error, Figure 5 is actually not there, it is been replaced to figure 4 (page no.4 under heading OBSERVATION, LINE NUMBER 4 TH ). 3) Tool used for software model identification is not mentioned. Tool has been mentioned in paper as MATLAB, Under heading ‘REDUCED AVR MODELS’, page number 3, line number 11. RESPONSE TO THE REVIEWER’S
-
Upload
shivan-biradar -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
6
description
This is how a reviewer puts up comment in the paper. after
Transcript of Reviewers Comment
REVIEWER’S COMMENT: Reply
1) Read the paper properly and correct typos. Necessary typos have been corrected in the paper wherever necessary.
2) Figure 5 is not there in the paper. It is typographical error, Figure 5 is actually not there, it is been replaced to figure 4 (page no.4 under heading OBSERVATION, LINE NUMBER 4TH).
3) Tool used for software model identification is not mentioned.
Tool has been mentioned in paper as MATLAB, Under heading ‘REDUCED AVR MODELS’, page number 3, line number 11.
RESPONSE TO THE REVIEWER’S
