Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE)...

54
Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak Pitakarnnop , Ph.D. [email protected] [email protected] Aircraft Propulsion 1 November 17, 2012

Transcript of Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE)...

Page 1: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 1

Review ofComponents Analysis

Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE)Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012)

Jeerasak Pitakarnnop , [email protected]@nimt.or.th

November 17, 2012

Page 2: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 2

Component Analysis

• Diffuser– Free Stream to Diffuser Inlet– Diffuser Inlet to Outlet

• Nozzle– Fixed Divergent Nozzle– Diverging Converging Nozzle

• Axial Flow Compressor• Axial Flow Turbine

November 17, 2012

Page 3: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 3

Engine without Inlet Cone

• Free Stream to Diffuser Inlet• Subsonic Flow• Supersonic Flow with Shock

• Diffuser Inlet to Outlet• Ideal Diffuser – Isentropic Flow• Non Ideal Diffuser – Fanno Line Flow

November 17, 2012

Page 4: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 4

Free Stream to Diffuser Inlet

November 17, 2012

πo represents loss from free stream to the inlet.

Subsonic Flow• πo ≈ 1 (= 1: ideal isentropic flow)

Supersonic Flow Shock• πo < 1

Page 5: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 5

Supersonic Flow with Normal Shocks

• Shocks usually occur exterior to, or near, the inlet plane of the diffuser when an aircraft flies supersonically.

• The strongest shocks is the normal shocks.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 6: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 6

Ex 1: Normal Shocks

A standing normal shock occurs on an aircraft flying at Mach 1.50. The internal recovery factor of the diffuser is 0.98, and the specific heat ratio is 1.40. Find the total recovery factor of the diffuser.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 7: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 7

Ideal Diffuser

November 17, 2012

Isentropic & Adiabatic Flow• Constant Total Pressure

pta = pt1 = pt2

• Constant Total TemperatureTta = Tt1 = Tt2

(hta = ht1 = ht2)

Page 8: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 8

Isentropic Flow

Oct. 13, 2012

Mach Number and Local Speed of Sound

Stagnation Relations

Area Ratio

Page 9: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 9

Limit on Pressure Rise

Separation is one of the limits of the diffuser operation.

Oct. 13, 2012

Aligned Inlet Flow:

for flow without separation.

Mis-Aligned Inlet Flow:Upper limit on the pressure coefficient will be

reduced appreciably to perhaps 0.1 to 0.2.

Page 10: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 10

Ex 2: Separation Limit

Design an ideal diffuser to attain the maximum pressure rise if the incoming Mach no. is 0.8. That is find the diffuser area ratio, pressure ratio and the resulting exit Mach number. Assuming isentropic flow and γ = 1.4.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 11: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 11

Non Ideal Diffuser

November 17, 2012

To quantify loss from the free stream to the diffuser exit, we introduce:• Total Pressure Recovery Factor:

where• πr is the diffuser pressure

recovery factor, and• πo represents loss from free

stream to the inlet.

High Speed/Flow decelerates/Pressure increases

Low Speed/Flow accelerates/Pressure decreases

Nearly Adiabatic Flow, assume:• Constant Total Enthalpy

hta = ht1 = ht2

• Constant Total TemperatureTta = Tt1 = Tt2

Page 12: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 12

Friction Flow

Viscous flows are the primary means by which total pressure losses occur!!

Fanno Line Flow: flow with friction but no heat transfer

Fanno Line Flow could be used when:• Exit-to-inlet area ratio is near unity,• The flow does not separate.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 13: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 13

Fanno Line FlowAdiabatic Flow of a Calorically Perfect Gas in a Constant-Area Duct with Friction

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 14: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 14

Engine with Inlet Cone

• Oblique Shock–Oblique Planar Shock–Oblique Conical Shock

• Mode of Operation–Design Condition–Off Design Condition

November 17, 2012

Page 15: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 15

Oblique Planar Shocks

• 2D planar shock is simpler than conical shock.• Occur when an inlet is attached to the

fuselage of the aircraft, the inlet is more or less rectangular, resulting in planar shock.

• Flow behind the planar shock is uniformly parallel to the wedge.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 16: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 16

Oblique Planar Shocks

Oct. 13, 2012

δ = deflection angleσ = shock angle

Page 17: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 17

Oblique Conical Shocks

• Found in many aircraft applications.

• A conical ramp is used to generate an oblique shock, which decelerate flow to a less supersonic conditions.

• A normal shock further decelerates the flow to a subsonic condition for the internal flow in the diffuser.

Oct. 13, 2012

Spike on BlackBird

Page 18: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 18

Oblique Conical Shocks

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 19: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 19

Oblique Conical Shocks

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 20: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 20

Oblique Conical Shocks

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 21: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 21

Modes of Operation

Oct. 13, 2012

Design Condition: the oblique shock intersects the diffuser cowl All the air that cross oblique shock enters the engine

Flow rate decreases Pressure in the diffuser decreases Mach no. in the diffuser decreases Shock is pushed out!!

Flow rate increases Pressure in the diffuser drops Shock moves into the diffuser

Shock is stronger larger total pressure lossSome of the air will be spilled high pressure additive dragShock is used to compress air outside shock wasting power

Acting like a supersonic nozzle Shock occurs in diverging section with high Mach no. More total pressure is lost.

Page 22: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 22

Mass Flow or Area Ratio

Oct. 13, 2012

True ingested mass

Mass flow enters the engine

Reference Parameter

Mass flow ratio

Page 23: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 23

Design Operation

November 17, 2012

Page 24: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 24

Off-Design Operation

When the diffuser operated at off-design conditions, the area should be varied so that it operates efficiently.

Oct. 13, 2012

In the case of a single planar oblique shock:

Inlet area could be determined from:

Page 25: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 25

Ex 3: Supersonic Diffuser

A diffuser with a spike is used on a supersonic aircraft. The freestream Mach number is 2.2, and the cone half-angle is 24°. The standing oblique shock is attached to the spike and cowl, and a converging inlet section with a throat of area Am is used to decelerate the flow through internal compression. Assume γ = 1.4 and πr = 0.98.

a. Estimate πd on the assumption the inlet starts. Also, find the required Am/A1

b. Find πd on the assumption the inlet doesn’t start and has a standing normal shock located in front of the spike.

Oct. 13, 2012

Page 26: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 26

NozzleFixed Diverging

Nozzle

November 17, 2012

Converging-Diverging Nozzle

Page 27: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 27

Primary Nozzle

In real analysis: Pexit may not match Pa due to incorrect nozzle area proportion. Frictional losses are include but adiabatic process still be assumed.

Nozzle Efficiency

Constant cp

Specific heat

Exit Velocity

Adiabatic

Oct. 20,2012

Page 28: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 28

Primary Nozzle

Adiabatic Process Flow: For the ideal case, isentropic process

Adiabatic

Thus,

Oct. 20,2012

Page 29: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 29

Primary Nozzle

Choke condition:

Then,

If p* > pa, the nozzle is chokeIf p*= p8, M8 = 1If p* < pa , M8 < 1 and p8 = pa

Oct. 20,2012

Page 30: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 30

Converging Nozzle

Oct. 20,2012

Exhaust of converging nozzle with matching exhaust and ambient pressures

Exhaust of under expanded converging nozzle

Page 31: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 31

Converging-Diverging Nozzle

Oct. 20,2012

Page 32: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 32

1st – 3rd Condition of CD nozzle

• Case 1: pexhaust = pambient and Subsonic Flow Through out the nozzle.

• Case 2: pexhaust = pambient and Subsonic Flow Through out the nozzle but Mthroat =1.

• Case 3: pexhaust = pambient , Subsonic Flow in the converging section and Supersonic Flow in the diverging section. – MAXIMUM THRUST– Design Condition for the ideal case

Oct. 20,2012

Page 33: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 33

4th Condition of CD Nozzle

• pambient is slightly above the designed pexhaust

– Result in a complex 2D flow pattern outside the nozzle

Oct. 20,2012

Considered as “Overexpanded Case”• The flow suddenly is compressed

and decelerates outside the nozzle.

• A series of compression waves and expand waves are generated.• Can be calculated basing on 2D

compressible flow

Page 34: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 34

5th Condition of CD Nozzle

• pambient is below the designed pexhaust

– Result in a complex 2D flow pattern outside the nozzle

Oct. 20,2012

Considered as “Underexpanded Case” or “Super Critical Case”• The flow continues to expand and

accelerates outside the nozzle.• A series of compression waves and

expanded waves are generated resulting in a series of shock diamonds.

Page 35: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 35

6th Condition of CD Nozzle• pambient is significantly above the designed pexhaust

But below the 2nd case– Result in a single normal shock or a series of oblique

and normal shocks called λ

Oct. 20,2012

Also “Overexpanded Case”• Result in a subsonic exit Mach no.: LOW THRUST Totally

undesirable

Page 36: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 36

7th Condition of CD Nozzle

• pambient is significantly above the designed pexhaust

Limit condition of the 6th case– Exit pressure causes a normal shock exactly at the exit

plane– Case 4 falls between case 7 and 3.

Oct. 20,2012

Page 37: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 37

Ex4: Converging-Diverging Nozzle

A converging-diverging nozzle with an exit area of 0.2258 m2 and a minimum area of 0.1774 m2 has an upstream total pressure of 137.895 kPa. The nozzle efficiency is 0.965 and the specific heat ratio is 1.35. a. At what atmospheric pressure will the nozzle

flow be shockless?b. At what atmospheric pressure will a normal

shock stand in the exit plane?Oct. 20,2012

Page 38: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 38

Axial Flow Compressor

November 17, 2012

Page 39: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 39

Velocity Polygon

November 17, 2012

Page 40: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 40

Total Pressure Ratio

• Power Input to the Shaft

October 27, 2012

• Total Pressure Ratio of the Stage

The equations is derived for a single stage (rotor and stator) using 2D planar mean line c.v. approach.“Midway between hub and tip”

Control Volume definition for compressor stage

Page 41: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 41

Percent Reaction

A relation that approximates the relative loading of the rotor and stator based on the enthalpy rise:

October 27, 2012

Page 42: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 42

Relationships of Velocity Polygons to Percent Reaction and Pressure Ratio

October 27, 2012

Page 43: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 43

Limit on Stage Pressure Ratio

• The rotor is moving, the relative velocity must be used:

October 27, 2012

• For the stator, which is stationary the relative velocity must be used:

1 and 2 refer to the stage inlet and midstage properties.

Page 44: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 44

Limit on Stage Pressure Ratio

Rotor

October 27, 2012

Stator

Page 45: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 45

Axial Flow Turbine

November 17, 2012

Page 46: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 46

Velocity Polygon

November 17, 2012

Page 47: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 47

Velocity Polygon

November 17, 2012

Page 48: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 48

Total Pressure Ratio

• Power Input to the Shaft

November 17, 2012

• Total Pressure Ratio of the Stage

The equations is derived for a single stage (rotor and stator) using 2D planar mean line c.v. approach.

“Midway between hub and tip”The continuity, momentum and energy equations are used for the delivered shaft power:

Page 49: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 49

Percent Reaction

A relation that approximates the relative loading of the rotor and stator based on the enthalpy rise:

November 17, 2012

Page 50: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 50

Relationships of Velocity Polygons to Percent Reaction and Pressure Ratio

November 17, 2012

Page 51: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 51

Turbine and Compressor Matching

1. Select operating speed.2. Assume turbine inlet temperature.3. Assume compressor pressure ratio.4. Calculate compressor work.5. Calculate turbine pressure ratio required to

produce this work.

November 17, 2012

Page 52: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 52

Turbine and Compressor Matching

6. Check to see if compressor mass flow plus fuel flow equals turbine mass flow; if it does not, assume a new value of compressor pressure ratio and repeat step 4, 5, and 6 until continuity is satisfied.Note: No need to do the iteration in the exam, I will provide a required values to determine other value.

November 17, 2012

Page 53: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 53

Turbine and Compressor Matching

Note: No need to do the iteration in the exam, I will provide a required values to determine the others from compressor and turbine performance maps.

Ex. For given rotational speed, mass flow rate and total pressure ratio across each component, efficiency could be determined.

November 17, 2012

Page 54: Review of Components Analysis Aerospace Engineering, International School of Engineering (ISE) Academic year : 2012-2013 (August – December, 2012) Jeerasak.

Aircraft Propulsion 54

Good Luck!!!

November 17, 2012