REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No....

172
Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2 www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620 October 16, 2014 REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that: you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”); you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable. Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer Kevin Filkow confirmed that he received a copy of all the documents that are before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review: Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Page 1 JAG-2014-01484 s.22 s.22 .

Transcript of REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No....

Page 1: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2 www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer Kevin Filkow confirmed that he received a copy of all the documents that are before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 1 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

.

Page 2: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? Based on a review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that the ASDs used to conduct your tests were reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my finding, I revoke your driving prohibition and any monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Kevin Filkow by fax to 604-370-2505

Page 2 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 3: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2 www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 6, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 22, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the ASD registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”)

being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”) you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September 29, 2014. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%?

Page 3 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 4: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? Based on my review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that the ASD used to conduct your test was reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my finding, I revoke your driving prohibition and any monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including the date on which your vehicle was eligible for release. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. Adjudicator M. Smith RoadSafetyBC

Page 4 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 5: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 13, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated a number of grounds for review that are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Jamie Butler, confirmed that he had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 5 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 6: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the second analysis performed on a different ASD? I am satisfied that the second analysis was not performed on a different ASD. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Jamie Butler (by fax)

604-739-9888

Page 6 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 7: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 28, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On June 17, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Bryan E. Fitzpatrick, confirmed that he had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 7 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 8: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including July 7, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Bryan E. Fitzpatrick (by fax) 250-785-4346

Page 8 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 9: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 28, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 11, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to, your lawyer, Stephen Suntok. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 9 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 10: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. Please contact the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) to determine your eligibility to apply for a BC driver’s licence or to arrange for your foreign driver’s licence to be returned to you. You must call ICBC Customer Contact at 250 978-8300 or toll free at 1-800-950-1498. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Stephen Suntok (by fax) 250-385-4506

Page 10 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 11: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 01, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 23, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you prior to this review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 11 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 12: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before met, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Was the ASD reliable? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that the ASD was reliable. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 1, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

F.Lee Adjudicator

Page 12 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 13: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 4, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated one ground for review which is not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 13 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 14: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were the ASDs reliable? I am satisfied that the ASDs were not reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

E. McLean Adjudicator

Page 14 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 15: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction On September 22, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Paul Pearson. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 15 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 16: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence, I find that there is only one issue that is determinative of this review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? There are three matters for me to determine in this issue. I must determine whether the peace officer made a valid demand, whether you failed or refused to comply with that demand, and whether you intended to produce that failure or refusal. After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the peace officer did not make a valid ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Paul Pearson fax: 250 480-0004

Page 16 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 17: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 17, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 4, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Craig D. Sicotte, confirmed that he had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 17 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 18: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Craig D. Sicotte (by fax) 604-585-8964

Page 18 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 19: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 20, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction

On March 16, 2014 a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”)

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. Preliminary Matters

Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 19 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 20: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis

Having reviewed the evidence of the officer and your submissions, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? I find that the second analysis provided by the officer was not performed with a different ASD. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition and monetary penalty as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. A refund of your licence reinstatement and licence renewal fees has been authorized and will be sent to you in approximately 6 - 8 weeks. If you have any outstanding fines or debts owing to the Province of British Columbia, your refund may be used to help offset those debts. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including March 20, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

M Thurlow Adjudicator

Page 20 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 21: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 2, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 21, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records indicate that you received all of the disclosure documents that are before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. You applied on one ground. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you.

Page 21 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 22: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Was the ASD reliable? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that the ASD used was reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 22 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 23: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 27, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction On July 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. I consider only the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Page 23 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 24: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Were the ASDs reliable? Having reviewed the evidence, I am not satisfied the ASDs were reliable at the time the officer used them to analyze samples of your breath on July 27, 2014. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

M Thurlow Adjudicator

Page 24 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 25: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

OCTOBER 17, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction

On April 9, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer Kevin Filkow confirmed that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to him. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of written material from Mr. Filkow including your Affidavit, Affidavit of

a copy of Modhgill v. BC (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2012 BCSC 1971, and two previous decisions from our office. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 25 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

s.22

Page 26: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis

There is one issue that is determinative of this review.

Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? Based on my review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that you failed or refused to comply with the ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including April 30, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Kevin Filkow by fax 604-370-2505

Page 26 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 27: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 1, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 14, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the oral hearing, your lawyer, Cathryn Waker, confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing all of the evidence before me, I find the evidence contained in the Report to Superintendent does not support the Prohibition as indicated on the Notice.

Page 27 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 28: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Cathryn Waker (by fax)

(604) 637-1617

Page 28 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 29: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

OCTOBER 17, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction

On April 26, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

At the beginning of the hearing your lawyer, Jennifer Currie, confirmed that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to her. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of written material from Ms. Currie dated May 6, 2014. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 29 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 30: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis

There is one issue that is determinative of this hearing.

Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? Based on a consideration of the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you did not fail or refuse to comply with the ASD demand. Decision

As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including May 15, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Jennifer Currie by fax 604-590-5626

Page 30 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 31: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 30, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 14, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds available to you in this review that are appropriate to the circumstances under which you were issued the prohibition. After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence for me to confirm your prohibition.

Page 31 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 32: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. ]If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Sarah Leamon by fax to 604-370-2505

Page 32 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 33: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc/

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

OCTOBER 24, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”)

Introduction

On August 13, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Mark Cacchioni. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence for me to confirm the prohibition. Decision

As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act.

Page 33 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 34: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No. P a g e | 2

Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. M. Smith Adjudicator cc Mark Cacchioni by fax 604-872-0617

Page 34 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 35: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction

On March 31, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

At the beginning of the hearing your lawyer, Cathryn Waker, confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 35 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 36: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis

There is one issue that is determinative of this review.

Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? Based on my review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that you failed or refused to comply with the ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including April 17, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Cathryn Waker by fax 604-637-1617

Page 36 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 37: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 29, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 20, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the oral hearing, your lawyer, Sarah Leamon, confirmed that she had full disclosure of the documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 37 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 38: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASD used to administer your second breath test was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Sarah Leamon (by fax) (604) 370-2505

Page 38 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 39: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On April 29, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you at the time you applied for review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 39 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 40: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? There are three matters for me to determine in this issue. I must determine whether the peace officer made a valid demand, whether you failed or refused to comply with that demand, and whether you intended to produce that failure or refusal. After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you did not fail or refuse to comply with the ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including May 20, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

M Thurlow Adjudicator cc. Sacha Roudette Carr Buchan & Company Fax: 250-388-7327

Page 40 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 41: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 2, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 5, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records indicate that your lawyer, Kyla Lee, received full disclosure. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 41 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 42: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Having considered the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628

Page 42 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 43: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 3 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including October 1, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee 604-685-8308

Page 43 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 44: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 8, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction

On July 9, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated four grounds for review, two of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Emmet J. Duncan, confirmed that he had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 44 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 45: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis

Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? I am satisfied that you did not fail or refuse to comply with the ASD demand. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including July 14, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Emmet J. Duncan (by fax)

604-488-1413

Page 45 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 46: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 10, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On March 26, 2014 a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you when you applied for review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis?

Page 46 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 47: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2

Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis As it is determinative of this review, I focus on the one key issue: Did the ASDs register “WARN” results? I am satisfied that the ASDs did not register “WARN” results. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. A refund of the fees you paid has been initiated. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements.

M Thurlow Adjudicator

Page 47 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 48: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 6, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No

Introduction On January 21, 2014, a peace Officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Paul Doroshenko, confirmed that he received full disclosure of the documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of correspondence from Acumen Law Corporation dated January 29, February 14, May 28 and June 5, 2014. After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence for me to confirm your prohibition.

Page 48 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 49: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Because your prohibition has been revoked, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs that you incurred up to the date that it was eligible for release (February 7, 2014). Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be attached. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee by fax 604-685-8308

Page 49 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 50: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On July 21, 2013, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated a number of grounds for review that are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Philip W. Cote. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 50 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 51: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including August 21, 2013. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Philip W. Cote (by fax)

778-395-6226

Page 51 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 52: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 29, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction On October 13, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the oral hearing, your lawyer, Chris Massey, confirmed that he had full disclosure of the documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 52 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 53: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASD used to administer your first breath test was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Chris Massey (by fax) (250) 920-0177

Page 53 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 54: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 21, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction On February 18, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated a number of grounds for review that are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. On February 26, 2014, this office received a 12-page facsimile from CARR BUCHAN & COMPANY, including an 8-page written submission that appears to be signed for Jeremy G. Carr. For the purposes of this review, I will refer to Sacha Roudette as your legal representative because records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me were faxed to her attention on February 24, 2014.

Page 54 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 55: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”? I am satisfied that your BAC was less than 80 mg%. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including March 5, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Sacha Roudette (by fax) 250-388-7327

Page 55 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 56: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

OCTOBER 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction

On May 8, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Gregg Alfonso. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of Mr. Alfonso’s submissions dated May 27, 2014.

Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 56 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 57: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review NoP a g e | 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis

There is one issue that is determinative of this review.

Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? Based on my review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that you failed or refused to comply with the ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision

As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Gregg A. Alfonso via fax 1-250-860-0290

Page 57 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 58: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 21, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No

Introduction On August 31, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated a number of grounds for review that are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Stephen Price, confirmed that he had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 58 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 59: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find that the evidence contained in the Report to Superintendent does not support the Prohibition as indicated on the Notice. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including September 11, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Stephen Price (by fax) 604-530-6282

Page 59 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 60: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 8, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 28, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On your IRP Application for Review, you indicated that you applied for this review on all 13 grounds, a number of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit, all grounds for review that apply to your case will be considered in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Kyla Lee. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 60 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 61: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were the ASDs reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASDs used to administer the breath tests were not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee (by fax) (604) 685-8308

Page 61 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 62: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 2, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Kyle McCleery. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing all of the evidence before me, I find that the Report to Superintendent is not properly sworn. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence.

Page 62 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 63: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Kyle McCleery (by fax)

(604) 684-0799

Page 63 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 64: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 30, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On April 1, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Deepak Gautam. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 64 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 65: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? I am satisfied that you were not advised of your right to request a second breath test analysis. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including April 15, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Deepak Gautam (by fax) 604-593-5311

Page 65 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 66: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; the ASD registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”)

being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”); and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. Section 215.5(2) of the Act states that if I determine that you were prohibited from driving for a longer time period than the Act requires, I must substitute the correct prohibition, vary the monetary penalty for which you are liable under section 215.44(1), and vary or revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me.

Page 66 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 67: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Preliminary Matters On your IRP Application for Review, you indicated that you applied for this review on three grounds, two of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit, all grounds for review that apply to your case will be considered in this review. At the beginning of the oral hearing, I confirmed that your lawyer, Claire Hatcher, had full disclosure of the documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Should your 7-day or 30-day prohibition be reduced because you did not have the

required number of previous IRP’s?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASD used to administer the first breath test was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements.

Page 67 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 68: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 3 Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Claire Hatcher (by fax) (604) 687-3022

Page 68 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 69: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 8, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On April 6, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On the IRP Application for Review, you indicated three grounds for review, one of which is not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. However, I have considered all grounds available to you in this review. At the beginning of the hearing, you confirmed that you had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 69 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 70: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including April 24, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator

Page 70 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 71: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 14, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 28, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing your lawyer, Jamie Butler, confirmed that he received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I have considered all the grounds available to you. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 71 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 72: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse? Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? When considering the evidence before me, I find that you did not fail or refuse to comply with a demand. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 14, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Jamie Butler 604-739-9888

Page 72 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 73: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

OCTOBER 6, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction

On September 24, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters

Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Kris S. Pechet. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of Mr. Pechet’s submissions dated October 1, 2014.

Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 73 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 74: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis

As there is one issue that is determinative in this review, I have only addressed that issue.

Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand?

I am satisfied that there is insufficient evidence before me on which I can find that you intentionally failed or refused to comply with an ASD demand. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision

As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Kris S. Pechet By Fax 604-519-6071

Page 74 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 75: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 6, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 20, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Mark Cacchioni. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 75 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 76: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Was the ASD reliable? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied the ASD was reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 6, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

N. James Adjudicator cc: Mark Cacchioni (by fax) (604) 872-0617

Page 76 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 77: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 21, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing your lawyer, Kyla Lee, confirmed that she received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you.

Page 77 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 78: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Was the ASD reliable? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that the ASD used was reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee 604-685-8308

Page 78 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 79: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Page 79 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 80: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Page 80 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 81: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 23, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 3, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing your lawyer, Cathryn Waker, confirmed that she received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I have considered all the grounds available to you. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 81 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 82: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse? Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? When considering the evidence before me, I find that you did not fail or refuse to comply with a demand. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Cathryn Waker 604-637-1617

Page 82 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 83: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 14, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of the hearing your lawyer, Sarah Leamon, confirmed that she received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. You applied on four grounds, one of which is not applicable to your situation. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you.

Page 83 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 84: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Was the ASD reliable? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that the ASD used was reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 14, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Sarah Leamon 604-370-2505

Page 84 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 85: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 1, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 13, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records indicate that you received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I have considered all the grounds available to you. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 85 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 86: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse? Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? When considering the evidence before me, I find that you did not fail or refuse to comply with a demand. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 86 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 87: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 20, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Kyla Lee. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation.

Page 87 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 88: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Was the ASD reliable? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that the ASD used was reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 9, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee 604-685-8308

Page 88 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 89: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 2, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 21, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On your IRP Application for Review, you indicated that you applied for this review on three grounds, all of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit, all grounds for review that apply to your case will be considered in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 89 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 90: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASD used to administer the first breath test was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter.

A. Gardner Adjudicator

Page 90 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 91: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Kyla Lee. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 91 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 92: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Were the ASDs reliable? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASD used for your second analysis was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee fax: 604 685-8308

Page 92 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 93: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 10, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On your IRP Application for Review, you indicated that you applied for this review on all 13 grounds, a number of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit, all grounds for review that apply to your case will be considered in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Jeremy G. Carr. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 93 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 94: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Jeremy G. Carr (by fax) (250) 388-7327

Page 94 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 95: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 17, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 2, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; the ASD registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”)

being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”); and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. Section 215.5(2) of the Act states that if I determine that you were prohibited from driving for a longer time period than the Act requires, I must substitute the correct prohibition, vary the monetary penalty for which you are liable under section 215.44(1), and vary or revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing all of the evidence before me, I find that the Report to Superintendent is not properly sworn.

Page 95 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 96: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition and monetary penalty as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. A refund of your reinstatement fee has been authorized and will be sent to you in approximately 6 – 8 weeks. If you have any outstanding fines or debts owed to the province of British Columbia, your refund may be used to help offset those debts.

A. Gardner Adjudicator

Page 96 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 97: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 20, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction

On June 29, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Issues

The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 97 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 98: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence of Constable Leonard and your submissions, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Did the ASD register a “FAIL” result?

After considering the evidence, I am not satisfied the ASD registered a “FAIL” result. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

M Thurlow Adjudicator

Page 98 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 99: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 21, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of the hearing your lawyer, Kyla Lee, confirmed that she received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 99 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 100: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable? Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Was the ASD reliable? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that the ASD used was reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 9, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee 604-685-8308

Page 100 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 101: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 1, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 15, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters On your IRP Application for Review, you indicated that you applied for this review on all 13 grounds, a number of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit, all grounds for review that apply to your case will be considered in this review. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Jeremy Carr. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 101 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 102: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter.

A. Gardner Adjudicator cc: Jeremy Carr (by fax) (250) 388-7327

Page 102 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 103: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On February 28, 2014 a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 103 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 104: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review DecisionPage 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis As it is determinative of this review, I focus on the one key issue: Were the ASDs reliable? I am satisfied that the ASDs were not reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, and monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including March 19, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements.

M Thurlow Adjudicator cc. Julian van der Walle fax: 250-503-0249

Page 104 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 105: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On February 15, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Kyla Lee, confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 105 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 106: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? I am satisfied that you were not advised of your right to a second breath test analysis. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including March 6, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Kyla Lee (by fax)

604-685-8308

Page 106 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 107: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 14, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Sarah Leamon. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 107 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 108: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find that there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Based on the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Sarah Leamon fax: 604 370-2505

Page 108 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 109: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2 www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 30, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 18, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the ASD registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being

not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”) you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that a copy of all the documents that are before me was provided to your lawyer, Sarah Leamon. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of Ms. Leamon’s correspondence dated October 28 and 29, 2014. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 109 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 110: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? Based on a review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that the ASDs used to conduct your tests were reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my finding, I revoke your driving prohibition and any monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Sarah Leamon by fax to 604-370-2505

Page 110 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 111: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On August 10, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records indicate that you received full disclosure. You applied on two grounds. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you. Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 111 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 112: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Having considered the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including August 20, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 112 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 113: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6888

October 21, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition No.

Introduction On May 11, 2014 a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you your lawyer, Jeremy Carr, prior to this review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Some of the grounds on which you applied for this review are not applicable to your situation because you were prohibited from driving because you failed or refused to comply with an ASD demand. Therefore, I will consider all of the grounds available to you in this review that are appropriate to those circumstances.

Page 113 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 114: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Review Decision Page | 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis As it is determinative of this review, I focus on the one key issue: Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Based on the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you operated or had care or control of a motor vehicle on May 11, 2014, at 03:10 hours. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including May 30, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

F. Lee Adjudicator Cc: JEREMY CARR, LAWYER, Via Fax 250-388-7327

Page 114 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 115: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 28, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing, your lawyer, Cathryn Waker, confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 115 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 116: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Was the ASD reliable? I am satisfied that the ASD used to administer the second breath test was not reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

E. McLean Adjudicator pc: Cathryn Waker (by fax) 604-637-1617

Page 116 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 117: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 30, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 19, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Cathryn Waker. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 117 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 118: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were the ASDs reliable? After reviewing the evidence, I am satisfied that the ASDs were not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Cathryn Waker fax: 604 637-1617

Page 118 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 119: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

OCTOBER 9, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 28, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Stanley Tessmer. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 119 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 120: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this hearing. Was the ASD reliable? Based on a review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that the ASD used to conduct your first test was reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my finding, I revoke your driving prohibition and any monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including September 10, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. Adjudicator McKenzie cc: Stan Tessmer by fax: 250 762 3163

Page 120 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 121: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 20, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 5, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the hearing your lawyer, Kyla Lee, confirmed that she received full disclosure of the documents before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence for me to confirm your prohibition.

Page 121 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 122: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC cc: Kyla Lee by fax 604-685-8308

Page 122 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 123: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 5, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Michael Shapray. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 123 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 124: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 16, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

N. James Adjudicator cc: Michael Shapray (by fax) (604) 590-5626

Page 124 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 125: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 22, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 4, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of all documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Jeffrey Arndt. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. had been made. I acknowledge receipt of Mr. Arndt’s correspondence dated October 16, 20 and 21, 2014.

Page 125 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 126: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “fail”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this hearing. Was the ASD reliable? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied the ASD test result was reliable. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Jeffrey Arndt By Fax 778-455-3999

Page 126 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 127: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 14, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing you confirmed that you received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I have considered all the grounds available to you. As per section 215.47 of the Act, I can consider any documents submitted by the officer that are not required to be sworn. This includes the Notice and Certificate of Service, and the information relating to the calibration of the ASDs. Given that the Narrative Text Hardcopy (the “Narrative”) is not a required document under section 215.47, and it has not been properly attached to the sworn Report to Superintendent (the “RTS”), I have not considered it in this review.

Page 127 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 128: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse? Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? When considering the evidence before me, I find that you did not fail or refuse to comply with a demand. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where the vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of the vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 14, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 128 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 129: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 7, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 22, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds available to you in this review that are appropriate to the circumstances under which you were issued the prohibition. At the beginning of the hearing your lawyer confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence for me to confirm your prohibition.

Page 129 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 130: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review NoP a g e | 2

Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Cathryn Waker by fax 604-637-1617

Page 130 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 131: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 7, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Julian van der Walle. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of Mr. van der Walle’s correspondence dated October 3, 2014.

Page 131 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 132: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “fail”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this hearing. Was the ASD reliable? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied the ASD test results were reliable. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including [the date of this letter/ the date your vehicle was eligible for release]. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Julian van der Walle By fax 1-250-503-0249

Page 132 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 133: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

OCTOBER 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 27, 2013, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 133 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 134: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis As there is one issue that is determinative in this review, I have only addressed that issue. Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “fail”? Having carefully considered the evidence before me, I am satisfied that your BAC was less than 80 mg%. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You were identified as the lessee of the vehicle on the Report to Superintendent Vehicle Impoundment. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including November 27, 2013, the date your vehicle was eligible for release. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you. A. Meyers Adjudicator pc: Cathryn Waker (604) 637-1617

Page 134 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 135: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On September 27, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing your lawyer, Cathryn Waker, confirmed that she received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I have considered all the grounds available to you. Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 135 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 136: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Having considered the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Cathryn Waker 604-688-8588

Page 136 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 137: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 7, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 7, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Kyla Lee. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing all of the evidence before me, I find the evidence contained in the Report to Superintendent does not support the Prohibition as indicated on the Notice.

Page 137 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 138: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including September 22, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee fax: 604 685-8308

Page 138 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 139: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 29, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (“ASD”); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. At the beginning of the hearing you confirmed that you had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation. In the hearing you raised a number of issues regarding the officers’ conduct during the investigation. The scope of this review is limited to the grounds as defined in section 215.5 of the Act. In this administrative review, I can only consider and make decisions on the issues noted below. While I acknowledge your concerns regarding the conduct of the officers, I am unable to provide a

Page 139 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 140: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

remedy in this review. Issues related to police conduct must be directed to the appropriate police authority. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did you fail or refuse to comply with an ASD demand? If you failed or refused to comply with the demand, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that you were not a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator

Page 140 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 141: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 30, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 17, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Sarah Leamon. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 141 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 142: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were the ASDs reliable? After reviewing the evidence, I am satisfied that the ASDs were not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Sarah Leamon fax: 604 370-2505

Page 142 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 143: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6888

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition No.

Introduction On May 4, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Jennifer Currie, prior to this review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 143 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 144: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Review Decision Page | 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review.  Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%?  After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that the “FAIL” was a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including May 21, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

F. Lee Adjudicator cc Jennifer Currie, Lawyer, via fax 604-590-5626

Page 144 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 145: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 23, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 7, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing you confirmed that you received full disclosure. I have proceeded with the review based on this confirmation.

Page 145 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 146: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Having considered the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 23, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 146 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 147: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 27, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 16, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the ASD registered a “WARN” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being

not less than 50 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“50 mg%”) you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 147 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 148: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition and monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements.

N. James Adjudicator

Page 148 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 149: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice Office of the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/osmv/

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 28, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 10, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is insufficient evidence to support the prohibition. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act.

Page 149 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 150: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review No.P a g e | 2

You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC

Page 150 JAG-2014-01484

s.22s.22

Page 151: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 6, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 12, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your representative, Bryan Fitzpatrick. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 151 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 152: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis After reviewing the evidence before me, I find that there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? I am satisfied that the ASD was not reliable. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further grounds in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Please note that the corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Bryan Fitzpatrick fax: 250 785-4346

Page 152 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 153: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 14, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On April 18, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to your lawyer, Jennifer Currie. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 153 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 154: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”? After reviewing the evidence before me, I am satisfied that your BAC was less than 80 mg%. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including May 9, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

N. James Adjudicator cc: Jennifer Currie (by fax) (604) 590-5626

Page 154 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 155: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 28, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 15, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the beginning of the oral hearing your lawyer, Erin Dance confirmed that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to her. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 155 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 156: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis Having reviewed all of the evidence before me, I find there is one determinative issue in this review. Was the ASD reliable? After considering the evidence before me, I am not satisfied the ASD was reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including October 28, 2014. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

N. James Adjudicator cc: Erin Dance (by fax) (604) 687-3022

Page 156 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 157: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2 www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 23, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On October 12, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the ASD registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being

not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”) you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different approved screening device

(“ASD”); the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that you received a copy of all the documents that are before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated October 18, 2014. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “WARN”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 50 mg%? Were you advised of your right to a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed with a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Page 157 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 158: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this review. Was the ASD reliable? Based on a review of the evidence, I am not satisfied that the ASDs used to conduct your tests were reliable. Having made this finding, I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my finding, I revoke your driving prohibition and any monetary penalty, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith, Adjudicator RoadSafetyBC

Page 158 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 159: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 3, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 14, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. At 9:00 am on September 25, 2014, I called you to conduct the oral hearing. In the hearing you informed me that you had not received the disclosure documents from the officer. I informed you that I had the disclosure documents before me, and that if you were able to attend the Driver Licensing Office they would have the documents for you. I adjourned the hearing until

Page 159 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 160: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

12:00 pm to allow you to pick up the disclosure documents, and to look them over prior to the hearing. When I contacted you again at 12:00 pm, you informed me that you had collected the disclosure documents, and had looked them over. Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did an ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Having reviewed the evidence before me, I find that there is one issue that is determinative of this review. Were the ASDs reliable? Based on the evidence before me, I am satisfied that the ASDs were not reliable. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator

Page 160 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 161: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 14, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction A peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters At the outset of your oral hearing you confirmed that you received full disclosure. You applied on three grounds. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you. Issues There are three issues in this review: 1. Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? 2. If so, did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? 3. If so, did you have a reasonable excuse?

Page 161 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 162: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Did you fail or refuse to comply with a demand? When considering the evidence before me, I find that you were not given a demand forthwith or as soon as practicable. Consequently, I find the demand was invalid. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 162 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 163: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6888

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition No.

Introduction On February 12, 2014 a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “fail” as a result of your blood alcohol

concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Records at this office confirm that full disclosure of the documents before me was provided to you prior to this review. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 163 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 164: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Review Decision Page | 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis As it is determinative of this review, I focus on the one key issue: Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Based on the evidence before me, I am not satisfied that you operated or had care or control of a motor vehicle on February 12, 2014, at 02:04 hours. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including February 26, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

F. Lee Adjudicator

Page 164 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 165: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 21, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No

Introduction On September 3, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (Act) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); you failed or refused to comply with a demand made under the Criminal Code to provide

a sample of breath for analysis by means of an approved screening device (ASD); and you did not have a reasonable excuse for failing or refusing to comply with a demand.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Upon review of the officer’s evidence, I find that the Report to Superintendent is not properly sworn. As a result, there is insufficient evidence before me to support the prohibition in the Notice.

Page 165 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 166: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including September 17, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

J. Dawns Adjudicator cc: Craig Sicotte 604-585-8964

Page 166 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 167: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 16, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) No.

Introduction On October 4, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the Notice). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); the approved screening device (the “ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters You applied on four grounds, one of which are not applicable to your situation because of the reason for which you were prohibited. For your benefit I have considered all the grounds available to you. At the outset of you confirmed that you received full disclosure. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation.

Page 167 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 168: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2 Issues

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? If requested, was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a

different ASD? Was the ASD reliable? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis I find there is one issue that is determinative of my review. Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Having considered the evidence before me, I cannot find that you were advised of your right to request a second analysis. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by s. 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. The corresponding vehicle impoundment is also revoked. The owner of the vehicle will be notified by separate letter that I am releasing the vehicle.

J. Dawns Adjudicator

Page 168 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 169: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice

RoadSafetyBC www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

PO Box 9254 Stn Prov Gov Victoria BC V8W 9J2

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 356-5577

October 15, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On August 29, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I am delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1); an approved screening device (ASD) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (BAC) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (80 mg%);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters I will consider all of the grounds of review which are relevant to the type of prohibition indicated on the Notice the peace officer served. At the beginning of the hearing your lawyer, Kyla Lee confirmed that she had received all of the disclosure documents before me. I have proceeded with the review based on that confirmation.

Page 169 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 170: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Having reviewed the evidence, I do not find that the Report to Superintendent provided by the officer is properly sworn. Having made this finding, I do not need to consider any further issues in this review. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. Records at this office indicate that the vehicle associated with this IRP has already been released. Since your IRP review is successful and the prohibition is revoked, you are eligible to have the towing and storage costs reimbursed by the Superintendent up to the amounts set out in the Lien on Impounded Motor Vehicle Regulation under the Motor Vehicle Act. Information concerning this Regulation can be found online at: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bclaws_new/document/ID/freeside/952568628 Upon receipt of your proof of payment, the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay the towing and storage costs up to and including September 15, 2014. Original receipts and invoices with proof of payment must be submitted for reimbursement. Examples of proof of payment include a towing and storage invoice created by the impound lot noting payment and a zero balance owing; invoice and cancelled cheque or credit card transaction slip; invoice and copies of identifiable payments from bank or credit card statements. You must also enclose a copy of this letter to ensure the correct charges are refunded to you.

A. McAlistair Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee fax: 604 685-8308

Page 170 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

Page 171: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

Ministry of Justice RoadSafetyBC PO BOX 9254 STN PROV GOVT VICTORIA BC V8W 9J2

www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/roadsafetybc

Telephone: (250) 387-7747 Facsimile: (250) 952-6620

October 8, 2014

REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No.

Introduction On September 19, 2014, a peace officer served you with a Notice of Driving Prohibition (the “Notice”). You applied to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles for a review of your driving prohibition and I have been delegated the authority to conduct this review. Section 215.5(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act (the “Act”) requires me to confirm your prohibition, along with the corresponding monetary penalty and vehicle impoundment, if I am satisfied that:

you were a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act; the approved screening device (“ASD”) registered a “FAIL” as a result of your blood

alcohol concentration (“BAC”) being not less than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood (“80 mg%”);

you were advised of your right to request a second analysis; if requested, it was provided and performed with a different ASD; the Notice was served on the basis of the lower analysis result; and, the result of the analysis on the basis of which the Notice was served was reliable.

Section 215.5(4) of the Act requires me to revoke your prohibition, cancel the monetary penalty, and revoke any corresponding vehicle impoundment if I am not satisfied of any of the above. In reaching my decision on this review, I must consider all relevant information provided to me. Preliminary Matters Some of the grounds on which you applied for this review do not apply to your situation. For your benefit, I will consider all of the grounds appropriate to the circumstances under which the peace officer served you with the Notice. Records at this office confirm that your representative, Kyla Lee, received a copy of all of the documents that are before me. I have proceeded with this review based on that confirmation. I acknowledge receipt of Ms. Lee’s correspondence dated October 6, 2014.

Page 171 JAG-2014-01484

s.22

s.22

Page 172: REVIEW DECISION Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) No. sdocs.openinfo.gov.bc.ca/...package_jag-2014-01484.pdf · I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated September

IRP Review Decision Page 2

Issues The following are the issues in this review:

Were you a driver within the meaning of section 215.41(1) of the Act? Did the ASD register a “FAIL”, and was it as a result of your BAC exceeding 80 mg%? Were you advised of your right to request a second analysis? Was the second analysis provided by the officer and performed using a different ASD? Was the Notice served on the basis of the lower analysis result? Was the ASD reliable?

Facts, Evidence and Analysis There is one issue that is determinative of this hearing. Was your BAC less than 80 mg% even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”? Based on the evidence before me, I cannot be satisfied that your BAC was 80 mg% or higher, even though the ASD registered a “FAIL”. Having made this finding I do not have to consider anything further. Decision As a result of my findings, I revoke your driving prohibition, monetary penalty, and vehicle impoundment, as required by section 215.5(4) of the Act. You may resume driving after you have obtained a driver’s licence from the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. If you hold an Enhanced Driver’s Licence, you must make an appointment to reapply for that licence. Please note that this decision does not change any other prohibitions from driving or licensing requirements. If you have not already done so, you may go directly to the location where your vehicle is impounded for the immediate release of your vehicle. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles will pay towing and storage costs up to and including the date of this letter. You are responsible for any storage costs beyond that date. You should know that if the vehicle is not reclaimed, the impound lot may apply to the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles to dispose of the vehicle. M. Smith Adjudicator cc: Kyla Lee by fax 604-685-8308

Page 172 JAG-2014-01484

s.22