Rethinking Solar System Bombardment: New Views on the ... · Suggested Reading Zellner N. E. B....
Transcript of Rethinking Solar System Bombardment: New Views on the ... · Suggested Reading Zellner N. E. B....
Rethinking Solar System Bombardment: New Views on the Timing and Delivery of Lunar Impactors
Nicolle ZellnerAlbion College
Why the Moon?• Samples and surface are (mostly) undisturbed• Samples can be dated (40Ar/39Ar, 87Rb/87Sr, etc.)• Craters can be counted
Lunar cratering rate anchors the impact chronology for the entire (inner) Solar System
Lunar Impact Flux Models
No Impacts
Cataclysm = LHB
Early IntenseBombardment
Monotonic
Decline
Cool early Earth First life First fossils?(~3.5 Ga)
Sawtooth
Modified from Zellner (PhD thesis); Hartmann (1965, 1966, 2000); Tera et al. (1974); Morbidelli et al. (2012)
The Impact FluxWays to interpret the time-varying impact flux:
Samples:▪ crystalline melts in Apollo samples▪ crystalline melt clasts in meteorites▪ zircons▪ lunar impact glass
Other:▪ crater counting and stratigraphy
~200 µm
10s µm
The “Cataclysm”
Wilhelms (1987), Hartmann (2000), Ryder et al. (2000), Koeberl (2006)
U-Pb agesStratigraphy
Crater countingA15, A17 breccia
40Ar/39Ar ages(Dalyrymple & Ryder,
1993, 1996)
4.3ish – 4.05 GaSPA
3.85 ± 0.02GaImbrium 3.893 ± 0.009 Ga
Serenitatis
~3.89 GaCrisium
3.92 – 3.90 Ga (?)Nectaris3.84 – 3.80 Ga (?)
Orientale
~800 MaCopernicus
~100 MaTycho
Other EvidenceMeteorites:impact, shock
Zircons:episodes ofheating
14 Lunar Meteorites
Age (Ga)4.5
2.03.9
# of
impa
ct e
vent
s
Prob
abilit
y of
a s
ampl
e ha
ving
a g
iven
age
4
1
2
3100s µm
from Figure 6c in Cohen et al. 2005
Nice ModelDescribed the Impact Mechanism
Objects scatter intothe inner Solar System after the orbital shift of Neptune (dark blue) and Uranus (lt. blue)
Current-ish Solar System, after
ejection of objects by planets
(JSUN)
Early configuration, before Jupiter and
Saturn reach a 2:1 resonance
(JSNU)
Gomes et al. (2005); Tsiganis et al. (2005); Morbidelli et al. (2005)
Changing Views
Artist Conception (NASA)
Orbital Data:LRO: LOLA, LROC
Sample Data:New interpretations
More dataImproved Techniques
LRO/LCROSS
Isotope re-CalibrationsSimilar ages insamples with similar compsfrom multiple
Apollo landing sites
All represent 1 event:Imbrium (~3.9 Ga)
Liu et al. (2012), Merle et al. (2014), Mercer et al. (2015)
Grange et al. (2010)
?
Crater Age (today)
SPA 4.2 Ga (?)
Serenitatis >4.1 – 3.87 Ga
Nectaris 4.1 Ga (?)
Crisium ~3.9 Ga (?)
Imbrium 3.77-3.90 Ga+
Norman (2008); Grange et al. (2010); Spudis et al. (2011)
+ Imbrium’s age is based on Apollo 14 and Apollo 15 samples, whose geologic provenance is not well-established
Age (before)
4.3ish – 4.05 Ga
3.893 ± 0.009 Ga
3.92 – 3.90 Ga (?)
~3.89 Ga
3.85 ± 0.02 Ga
(based on new calibrations and superpositioning of ejecta blankets from orbital data)
Updated Basin Ages
Neumann et al. 2015Multiple new basins w/ >300 km diameters6 known basins with D >200 km larger than previously measured
GRAIL Data
Result → CSFDs need to be recalibrated and theimpact flux changes
Byerly and Lowe (2010, 2015)Lowe et al. (2014)
Result: LHB lasted longer than we thought
Barberton (SA):Multiple impact spherule layers from large distal impacts between3.5 and 3.2 Ga
Archean Impacts on Earth
Old Lunar Sample AgesApollo 16 impact breccia U-Pb age:
large event at 4.22 ± 0.01Ga
Apollo 16 melt 40Ar–39Ar ages:4.21 ± 0.05 Ga and 4.29 ± 0.04 Ga
Fernandes et al. (2013)
Lunar zircon heating events w/ U–Pb ages: 4.3 ± 0.01, 4.2 ± 0.01, and 3.9 ± 0.01 Ga
Hopkins and Mojzsis (2015)
Norman et al. (2016)Norman and Nemchin (2014)
10s µm
ImbriumSamples
O2 Whiffs @3200 Ma, 2600 Ma
GOE
Lunar Flux
Early Life on EarthC isotope evidence for life:
>4.0, zircons (Bell et al. 2015)
3.95 Ga, Canada (Tashiro et al. 2017)
3.85 Ga, Akilia, Greenland (Mojzsis et al. 1996)(though highly contested in the literature)
3.8 Ga, Isua Greenland (Schidlowski, 1988)
Fossil evidence for life: 3.77 Ga, marine hematite
tubes (Dodd et al. 2017)
3.48 Ga, terrestrial palisadefabric (Djokic et al. 2017)
Impacts were not very frequent but were prolonged (~4.1 to 3.2 (or younger) Ga)
No impact frustration (Maher and Stevenson, 1988)
No impact sterilization (Sleep et al. 1989; Nisbet and Sleep, 2001)
A cool early Earth (Wilde et al., 2001; Watson and Harrison, 2005)
Delivery of CHONPS (e.g., amino acids, sugars)
Impacts did affect life butstill it persisted
Early Life on Earth
Suggested ReadingZellner N. E. B. (2017) Cataclysm no more: New views on the timing and delivery of lunar impactors, Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 47(3), 261-280,doi:10.1007/s11084-017-9536-3
“Bashing holes in the tale of Earth’s troubled youth”:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01074-6
“Fossil Discoveries Challenge Ideas About Earth’s Start”: https://www.quantamagazine.org/fossil-discoveries-
challenge-ideas-about-earths-start-20180122/
ReferencesHartmann W. K. (1965) Terrestrial and lunar flux of
large meteorites in the last two billion years. Icarus, 4, 157–165.
Hartmann W. K. (1966) Early lunar cratering. Icarus, 5, 406–418.
Hartmann W. K., Ryder G., Dones L., and Grinspoon D. (2000) The time-dependent intense bombardment of the primordial Earth/Moon system, in Origin of the Earth and Moon (R. Canupand K. Righter, eds.), 493-512, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 555 pp.
ReferencesTera F., Papanastassious D. A., and Wasserburg G.
J. (1974) Isotopic evidence for a terminal lunar cataclysm. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 22, 1-21.
Gomes R., Levison H. F., Tsiganis K., Morbidelli A. (2005). "Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets". Nature 435 (7041): 466–9.
Ryder, G. (2002) Mass flux in the ancient Earth-Moon system and benign implications for the origin of life on Earth, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (E4), doi: 10.1029/2001JE001583.