Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

56
Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology Kevin M. Folta Professor and Chairman Horticultural Sciences Department kfolta.blogspot.com @kevinfolta [email protected]

Transcript of Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Page 1: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Kevin M. FoltaProfessor and Chairman

Horticultural Sciences Department

kfolta.blogspot.com@kevinfolta

[email protected]

Page 2: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

"There is a path to truth and sincerity that you must guard and defend“

-- Teruyuki Okazaki

Page 3: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

•13 international scholars•Undergraduate researchers

•Examine how light affects plant traits, and use as a non-chemical treatment for enhanced shelf life

•Use of natural fruit volatiles to slow spoilage

•Connecting genes to important traits in small fruits.

•Marker-assisted breeding

My Research Program

Page 4: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Everyone Loves New Technology

Page 5: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Rekindled Awareness

FarmersDeveloping World

The NeedyFood Safety

Environment

Consumers

Page 6: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

But What About Agricultural Biotechnology?

Generally:

People don’t have any idea what it is.

People don’t know how biology works.

Few understand farming and supply chains.

The just know that they don’t like biotech crops.

Page 7: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

A Small Number of Non-Scientists Influence Public Opinion

Oz Smith Shiva Adams Mercola Food Babe

Why? There is money to be made in manufacturing risk.There is a market of the credulous poised to ampilify the message

Page 8: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Rel

ativ

e nu

mbe

r in

pop

ulat

ion

Relative understanding

Activists

Farmers, scientists,

Etc.

MOST PEOPLE!!!!

Based on findings from UF PIE Center

Page 9: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

What Does the General Public Really Think?

“92% of Americans demand to know what is in their food”

Page 10: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 11: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 12: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 13: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 14: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

1996 Today Wide Application

Smart RegulationPublic Participation

Traits in Minor CropsConsumer Traits

Acceptance Gap X years

Minor effectors:Continued safe implementationConsumer-centric traits

Major effectors:Decreasing credibility of vocal minorityRecognition as complementary / synergistic

with organic/sustainable

#1 EffectorCommunication via high-credibility channels

Less impact of “leaders”

Dire predictions never materialize

How to Fix It? Shifting the Middle

Page 15: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Communicating the Message (General)

•Communication is listening and responding•Understand your audience. They are concerned about food•You must prove that you understand their concern•Always discuss strengths and limitations•If you don’t know, offer to find out•This is about sharing science, not beating people to death with it.•It is about being a teacher. Recognizing that you know more about a topic than others, and working hard to clearly explain the issue.

•This is not as much a scientific exercise as a communications exercise.

Page 16: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Communicating the Message (Specific)

•Master a central core of key concepts

•Understand mechanisms of current traits

•Be able to address basic mythology

•Emphasize lost opportunities

•Take on active engagement and participation

Increas in

g d

if ficulty

Page 17: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Central Core Concepts

Humans have always participated in plant genetic improvement.

Transgenic crop technology (familiar “GMO”) is a precise extension of conventional plant breeding.

“The techniques used pose no more risk (actually less risk) than conventional breeding.” (NAS, AAAS, AMA, EFSA many others)

In 17 years there has not been one case of illness or death related to these products

In the USA there are several traits used in only nine commercial crops

Page 18: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Dispelling the Naturalistic Fallacy– This is Nothing New!

Remind audiences that genetic improvement of food is a continuum.

Almost none of the plants we regularly consume originated in North America. Almost all were brought here by humans.

None of the food you eat is like its “natural” form

GM technology is simply the most precise version of an age-old practice of breeding and selection.

Page 19: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Humans have always manipulated crop genetics

Page 20: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 21: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

GE vs. Traditional Breeding

Wide crosses exchange hundreds or thousands of genes and gene variants; GE moves only one/few.

Traditional breeding frequently uses plants that could never normally cross, GE uses genes from self or any other organism

GE can monitor the effect of a specific change; breeding seeks to judge the effect on plant productivity and does not address possible effects on individual genes.

Page 22: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Only nine crops, basically three traits.

Memorize which ones are commercialized. Ask others which ones are commercialized.See how the answers match.

Or don’t.

Page 23: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

GM Crops Available Now

9

potato

Page 24: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Keep it Simple– What are the Three Main Traits?

Virus Resistance

Insect Resistance

Herbicide Resistance

(how the traits work lecture online – (google “ UF biotechnology literacy day”)

Page 25: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Strengths Limitations

Virus resistance Works great, no foreign material

Has cut insecticide use by 10-70%

Saves time, labor, fuel. Allows conservation tillage

Can spread to nonGM populations

Pockets of developing resistance

Resistant weeds are a problem in areas.

Insect resistance

Herbicide resistance

Distill Into Digestible Units - Keep it simple. Discuss strengths and limitations (don’t create false equivalence)

Page 26: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

COMMUNICATION BARRIERS

Page 27: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

“FACTS DON’T MATTER.”- Tamar Haspel

People reject the validity of scientific conclusions if they contradict their deeply held views

“Backfire Effect”- when confronted with evidence that is contrary to their views, people tend to believe that the evidence is distorted. They also “dig in the heels” with their beliefs

Cultural Cognition – belief in trangenic harm as part of a package of beliefs

False Equivalence, “no consensus among scientists”

Page 28: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

To win hearts and minds we have to come at it from a different angle.

Humanization- I’m a parent… I care about my community… My family’s health is my priority…

Your Priorities- Profits for farmers… low environmental impacts… Food for those that need it… affordable, safe food in the industrialized world…

You can lead smart people to a conclusion- Ask questions, based on impacts for people and the environment.

Page 29: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Your Role is to be a More Trusted Source

1. Share your story. People respond best to a narrative.

2. Your job- “I work for you”, “I would not be able to sleep at night knowing I did something dangerous”

3. Your funding- “all public record”, “companies sell to farmers, if they are not happy, we don’t profit”, “if anyone were to be harmed we’d be out of business”

4. Use your real name and provide an email address in online discussions.

Transparency builds trust, trust helps communication.

Page 30: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Avoid these Mistakes

Avoid “feed the world” rhetoric

Always discuss strengths and limitations

Don’t ever claim it is a single solution.

Don’t discount all facets of “organic” ag

Don’t criticize other forms of genetic improvement…

Never get backed into the “science no”“Can you guarantee that these are absolutely safe?”

Page 31: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Rely on Graphics Over Words

Instead of “glyphosate is relatively harmless- don’t worry about it.”

Page 32: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

How Do We Shift Public Sentiment?

Page 33: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

How do we participate effectively? Winning the Emotional Capital

Consequences of Non-Actionand Lost Opportunities

Opposition to this technology has significant costs.

The needyThe environmentFarmersConsumers

Page 34: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Technology Exists NOW

Research has been published demonstrating that transgenic techniques can:

Help farmers save labor, fuel, water, fertilizer, other inputs.

Biofortify foods with vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients

Grow plants in marginal areas

Grow plants with fewer inputs Efficient use of fertilizersInsect resistanceDisease resistance

Page 35: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Crop Biotechnology 2.0

What opportunities are lost because of the rigorous, time consuming and expensive deregulation process?

Page 36: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 37: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Golden Rice

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Opposition to golden rice cost $2 billion to farmers in developing countries and 1.4 million human years – Wesseler et al., 2014

Page 38: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Cassava

Virus Resistant Cassava (VIRCA)

Biocassava Plus (BC Plus)

250 million depend on cassava

50 million tons lost to virus.

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 39: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Survives moderate drought, especially at key times like flowering It is based on overexpression of a maize stress gene

Non transgenic transgenic

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 40: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Allergy-Free Peanuts

Peanut – RNAi suppression Ara h2

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 41: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

BS2 TomatoA pepper gene in tomato eases black spot and wilt.

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 42: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

High Anthocyanin TomatoA transcription factor excites anthocyanin production in fruits

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

X

Longer shelf life too.

Page 43: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Low Acrylamide, non Browning Potatoes

X

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 44: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Non Browning ApplesSilencing a gene that leads to discoloration

X

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Small Business!X

Page 45: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Grapes resistant to Pierce’s Disease

X

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

X

Page 46: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 47: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

One acre of omega-3 producing soybeans yields as much oil as 10,000 fish!

Page 48: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Stopping Citrus Greening

Spinach defensin

NPR1

Lytic peptides

Many show promise

Earliest deregulation is 2019

Page 49: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Edible Cotton Seeds!

Chestnut blight has destroyed the American Chestnut.

A single gene confers resistance to the disease.

Not food… so deregulation is an interesting question.

Page 50: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

What Happens if We Fail to Stand Up for Science?

Expensive and Unnecessary Changes in

Public Policy

Limited Choices of Improved Varieties for

Farmers

Fewer Choices for Consumers

Slower Deployment of

Technology that Could Help

the Needy

Page 51: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

What Happens if We Fail to Stand Up for Science?

Slow Deployment of New Plant Varieties that Limit

Inputs Affecting the Environment

Consumers Live in Fear, are Exploited by Charlatans

Endless litigation

Negative Perception of Food and the Farmers that

Grow It.

Page 52: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Action StepAction StepStart a blog. Write weekly

Get a Twitter account. Post daily

Participate in online comments and forums, particularly in local papers.

Talk to one person a week that does not understand biotechnology

Contact your representatives and make your voice heard.

Know how to find the educators and reach out to them.

I will help you get started.

Page 53: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

In Conclusion

Our mission is to develop genetics and production methods to generate more food on the same space with fewer inputs.

Learn the basics, or at least learn where to find the basics

When communicating these topics, remember, we are not always talking to people that understand science and agriculture. Teach with compassion.

Facts don’t matter. You need to be a trusted conduit first, before information can be persuasive.

Page 54: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology
Page 55: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

"There is a path to truth and sincerity that you must guard and defend“

-- Teruyuki Okazaki

Page 56: Rethinking Communication in Agricultural Biotechnology

Where do I get good information?

Warm welcome Cold facts

[email protected]

GMOanswers.com

Biofortified.org geneticliteracyproject.com

GMOLOL On Facebook