Results of “Call for earthquake forecast models, test regions & forecast evaluation methods”
description
Transcript of Results of “Call for earthquake forecast models, test regions & forecast evaluation methods”
Results of “Call for earthquake forecast models, test regions & forecast evaluation methods”
Research group of earthquake forecast systems based on seismicity of Japan
in collaboration with D. Schorlemmer, F. Euchner, and CSEP working group
International symposium “Toward constructing earthquake forecast systems for Japan”
27 May 2009 at ERI, Univ. Tokyo
The earthquake forecast testing experiment Current stage: Testing
Center was installed and three models are under test.
Next stage: Use the existing Testing Center to start a formal testing this academic year
Triple-S ALM RI
Rules of the game- Testing regions
• Default regions (d≤30km) with grid spacing 0.1 deg.
• Invite test regions
- Testing classes (Invite forecast models)• 1-day forecast
• 1-year forecast
• 5-year forecast
- Future earthquakes that will be forecast: • The revised JMA bulletin. No declustering.
• Number of earthquakes in a predefined time window for each magnitude bin in the range 5.0≤M≤9.0 (0.1 magnitude unit steps) at each predefined grid node within a predefined testing region.
- Forecast evaluation methods• CSEP official suite
• Invite forecast evaluation methods
- We noticed this experiment to seismologists through our webpage and Newsletter of Seism. Soc. Japan in 2009
Give notice of proposals
Earthquake forecast model proposal
Test region proposal and applicable forecast
models
Forecast evaluation method proposal
Forecast models Seismicity-based forecast models with different
earthquake-generation hypotheses. - ALM: D. Schorlemmer (1 yr)
- Triple-S: J. Zechar (1 yr)
- RI: K.Z. Nanjo (1 yr, 1 day if there is any proposed one-day model)
- Asperity-based: S. Matsumura (1 yr)
- Double-branching: W. Marzocchi (1 yr: need to be checked)
- ETAS: Ogata (1 yr: need to be checked)
- ETAS: J. Zhuang (1 yr: need to be checked)
- MARFS, MARFSTA, & JMM: C. Smyth (1 yr)
Proposed test regions Default all Japan with d≤30km (proposed by CSEP): ALM , Triple-S, RI, Double-branching, ETAS (Ogata), ETAS (Zhuang), MARFS, MARFSTA & JMM.Same with d≤100km (proposed by EFSSJ): Models are invited
Default all Japan with d≤30km (proposed by CSEP): ALM , Triple-S, RI, Double-branching, ETAS (Ogata), ETAS (Zhuang), MARFS, MARFSTA & JMM.Same with d≤100km (proposed by EFSSJ): Models are invited
Kanto with d≤100km (proposed by Nanjo): Models are invited
Kanto with d≤100km (proposed by Nanjo): Models are invited
Off Ibaraki with d≤100km (proposed by Matsumura): Asperity-based
Off Ibaraki with d≤100km (proposed by Matsumura): Asperity-based
Evaluation methods CSEP official suite that is currently used: J. Zechar
- Likelihood-based N, L, R-tests
- Alarm-based tests
Conventional likelihood-based methods: M. Imoto