Restrictions Needed on EM_RF Mind Control Technology

8/3/2019 Restrictions Needed on EM_RF Mind Control Technology

1/18

ew Devices That 'Talk' To The Human

Mind eed Debate, Controls12-1-99

By Eleanor White - Correspondent

The American Reporter - Vol. 6, No. 1290

HAMILTO, Ont., Canada - The recent flap over

invasive "X-ray" devices at Los Angeles International

Airport that can scan the human body more invasively

than ever before is just the tip of a technological iceberg

which has been growing for half a century and has now

yielded devices literally capable of "broadcasting"

directly to the human mind.

Yet, in spite of considerable material published over the

past half-century, the arrival of a time when anymoderately wealthy person can purchase or have devices

made to order that can "talk to" the brain and nervous

Restrictions Needed On EM/RF Mind Control Technology http://www.rense.com/general/restrictions.htm

1 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05


2/18

system, has been met with silence. Indeed, in a response

(http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif) to a 1975 request to the

National Security Agency (NSA) for information on

mind control devices, the NSA said one responsive

document obtained from the Russians by the DefenseIntelligence Agency could cause "exceptionally grave

damage" to national security if released.

The seminal event in the developments that have

produced "electronic mind weapons" was the discovery

during World War II that radar technicians could hearthe buzz of the radar signal in their skulls, no receiver

needed, when they worked in close proximity to an

energized antenna. Radar signals are a uniform train of

short pulses of microwave signal, and the audible effect

matches the pulse rate.

This told scientists that by pulsing a radio signal, it ispossible to have the signal interact with the brain and

nervous system.

Radar hearing was studied on a grant from General

Electric in the early 1960s by scientist Dr. Allan Frey, at

Cornell University in upstate New York. Dr. Frey's work

has been reported in several scientific journals, includingthe Journal of Applied Physiology, 17(4): 689-692.

1962.

Dr. Frey found that a wide spectrum of "carrier"

frequencies, (that is, the "spot on the radio dial" of the

test signals,) when pulsed, and from about 125megahertz (lower TV channel range) well up into the

microwave region, could cause buzzes or clicks to be


2 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05


3/18

heard by the test subject. If a steady train of uniform,

short, sharp pulses was aimed at a test subject's head, a

buzz was heard. If a single pulse was transmitted, then

the subject heard a pop.

In general, unclassified experiments on human beings lay

dormant for the next decade, at least according to

information dveloped by a Canadian organization,

Citizens Against Human Rights Abuses (CAHRA), has

been able to unearth. The pulses needed to place a

signal power of about three-tenths of a watt per square

centimeter on the subject's skull in order for the signal to

be heard.

For ethical scientists, this power level -- about the same

as when basking under an infrared heat lamp -- indicated

caution. Further studies at the cellular level have turned

up sensitivities to certain signals far, far below that level.Dr. Ross Adey of the University of California at

Riverside, a leading experimenter in this area, has

recently warned (http://electric-words.com

/adey/adeyindex.html) that "there are important

biomedical considerations associated with long term

exposure to any environmental factor capable of tissue

interactions."

Other scientists studied "microwave hearing" by means of

exposing animals to various combinations of carrier

frequency, pulse shape, and power level. The animals

were tested at the simplest level for "startle" response, by

applying a simple pulse or pulse train to a caged orrestrained animal.


3 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05

R t i ti N d d O EM/RF Mi d C t l T h l htt // / l/ t i ti ht


4/18

More invasive unclassified experiments were performed

in which electrodes were implanted into the brains of the

animals, in areas of the brain where vision, sound, and

other perceptive functions were known to reside. These

electrodes measured the response of each perceptionregion to different signal types.

These animal studies found that various perception

effects are frequency and power dependent. That is

logically to be expected, since the size of the animal and

its sensory organs and brain region vary in size. Size

affects how much of the power from an incoming signal

is absorbed, and absorption is necessary to generate

effects.

One of the most notable scientists in the animal exper-

imental field was Dr. Jose Delgado, Director of

Neuropsychiatry at Yale Medical School in the early1970s. In a segment titled "Special Assignment" on CNN

in 1985, Dr. Delgado demonstrated that by mounting a

transmitter on an animal, and having received radio

signals converted to stimulating pulses fed to implants in

the animal's brain, behavior can be dramatically altered.

A bull apparently intent on challenging an experimenter

with a radio transmitter stopped moving toward the

experimenter when the appropriate button on a small

transmitter was pressed.

While this was not direct radio signal-to-brain

technology, it did demonstrate clearly that the brain can

be controlled by electrical stimulation. It also,significantly, demonstrated intent. Demonstration of

intent is crucial to anyone interested in arousing public


4 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05

Restrictions Needed On EM/RF Mind Control Technology http://www rense com/general/restrictions htm


5/18

interest in getting electronic mind weapons exposed,

debated, and controlled.

Three other effects were discovered during these animal

experiments: Window effect, bio-amplification, andbio-detection.

Window effect means that, just as with drugs, there is

both a minimum and maximum signal level which will

cause a desired effect. Bio-amplification is the more

significant phenomenon, as what it means in practical

terms is that at just the right frequency and pulse shape,

a given effect can be produced with very small power

levels, far below power levels required to produce

heating. Under grants from the government, Dr. Adey

studied how electromagnetic (i.e. "radio") signals

interacted with cells down to the molecular level.

Bio-amplification also makes possible signals which do

not interfere with radio and TV appliances, and which

are extremely hard to detect. Hopping these small signals

around in a band of effectiveness makes then virtually

impossible to detect.

Bio-detection means that a cell is not simply"stimulated" at a certain signal frequency, but can

actually behave according to "modulation" applied to

that signal. The old crystal set radios are one of the

simplest detectors of "modulation". When voice is

superimposed on a steady carrier frequency, that

variation in the signal is called the modulation. The

crystal set extracts the voice and causes the attached

headphones to reproduce the original voice.


5 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



6/18

Headphones alone cannot respond to frequencies as high

as, say, AM broadcast band signals, and the detector, the

crystal or diode, converts the radio signal into a voice

signal. Cells can do the same thing. This leads to thenext stage in radar-hearing human experimentation: The

successful transmission of, first, morse code, and then

voice, to a human test subject.

That milestone was apparently been achieved a quarter

of a century ago. In the Journal of the American

Psychological Association in March 1975, Dr. Don R.

Justesen wrote:

"Communication has in fact been demonstrated. A. Guy

(Note 1), a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his father, a

retired railroad telegrapher, to operate a key, each

closure and opening of which resulted in a pulse ofmicrowave energy. By directing the radiations at his own

head, complex mess- ages via the Continental Morse

Code were readily received by Guy.

"Sharp and Grove (note 2) found that appropriate

modulation of microwave energy can result in "wireless"

and "receiverless" communication of speech. Therecorded by voice on tape each of the single-syllable

words for digits between 1 and 10. The electrical

sine-wave analogs of each word were then processed so

that each time a sine wave crossed zero reference in the

negative direction, a brief pulse of microwave energy was

triggered.

"By radiating themselves with these "voice modulated"


6 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



7/18

microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to hear,

identify, and distinguish among the 9 words. The sounds

heard were not unlike those emitted by persons with

artificial larynxes."

This early '70s success forms the basis for the powerful

mind weapons that are still classified today. This writer

makes no judgement here as to the truth of the

allegations of CAHRA's 300 members, who claim to

have been targetted by devices based on technology like

this. Pain, manipulation of body parts, and hypnotic

effects have all been reported, with a high degree of

sameness among those reporting such effects.

However, the experimental results above make it plain

that the means to communicate electronically with the

brain and nervous system have existed for some time,

outside the classified realm.

Audible words may be transmitted, as described above.

A more recent technology can be coupled to "microwave

hearing" to produce a signal which can carry vocal

content which is not consciously audible, but is

"audible" to the human mind. This is called "SSSS" or

"S-QUAD" or "Silent Sound Spread Spectrum"technology.

The first unclassified patent found by CAHRA is U.S.

Patent 5,159,703, by Dr. Oliver Lowery, dated October

27, 1992. This technology converts a hypnotist's voice to

non-consciously-audible ultrasound, which can be sent

using microwave hearing, or piggybacked on to

commercial broadcast sound. This powerful combination


7 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



8/18

of technologies can be used to apply hypnosis,

undetectably over months and years.

Britain's ITV News Service, in March of 1991, reported

the use of ultrasound carried via a commercial FMchannel (100 MHz) to entrain the brains of Iraqi troops

to pulse rates set to produce despair, during the Gulf

War. Clearly both means and motive exist to use

technologies developed over the past half-century. But

has there also been a motive for criminal use of such

devices?

Potential For Abuse

To recap, new devices which can "talk to" the human

brain and nervous system are a reality. They have, in

their classified form, been a reality at least since Dr.

Joseph Sharp's successful transmission of voice usingpulsed microwave radio signals in 1973.

In the first part of this article, scientific research was

summarized describing the events which led to Dr.

Sharp's success. The chain of events was begun with the

World War II discovery that radar signals can be "heard"

buzzing within the skull of technicians working in closeproximity to energized equipment.

Studies on animals, and Dr. Allan Frey's human

experiments at Cornell University showed that this

phenomenon is both frequency and power level

dependent. Also discovered were that (a) cells assist in

amplifying radio signals at certain frequencies, and (b)

cells can not only respond to a radio signal, but can

gy p g

8 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



9/18

actually "detect," that is, "decode" any modulation, such

as voice, superimposed on the basic carrier signal.

Finally, brief reference was made to a form of sound

conversion, "Silent Sound," in which both mood setting("brain entrainment") signals and ultrasound voice

facsimile can be used to undetectably communicate with

the human brain. The radio signal or "microwave

hearing" phenomenon can carry "Silent Sound," or,

"Silent Sound" can be carried on top of an audible radio

or TV sound broadcast.

This capability to carry inaudible "voice" or "mood"

signals sets the stage for undetectable and repetitive

hypnosis. Although the full details remain classified, the

British ITV wire service received reports that the U.S.

military used Silent Sound, piggybacked on FM

broadcasts to Iraqi troops, to set them up for a quicksurrender.

To this point, then, we can see that the potential for

extremely invasive, undetectable, and unethical use of

these technologies exists. Being undetectable and easy to

suspend when witnesses are present, the world's justice

systems can offer no remedy should the equipment beused against citizens in their homes and communities.

The question now is: "How likely is it that the unethical,

involuntary, aggressive or voyeuristic use of these

technologies has happened, is happening, or may be

happening, by those who possess these devices?"

To evaluate this likelihood, one must answer this

gy p g

9 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



10/18

question: "Why would anyone use invasive, silent

electronic equipment to both cause pain and discomfort,

or, to read the state of mind, including said-to-self vocal

thoughts and images, on a non-volunteer subject?"

One word sums the answer up quite thoroughly:

"MKULTRA." MKULTRA was originally a collection of

149 psychological warfare and interrogation experiments

commissioned in the 1950s by the CIA. These

experiments were spurred into existence by the

"brainwashing" tactics used on Korean POWs, which

involved torture, sensory deprivation, and drugs.

MKULTRA planners decided that for brainwashing and

other types of "mind control" activity, it was essential

that involuntary test subjects be used. (No doubt, too,

that volunteers for such horrible experiments would be

nearly impossible to recruit.)

Among CAHRA members, and a parallel organization

named ACHES-MC (Advocacy Committee for Human

Experimentation Survivors - Mind Control), are severely

and seemingly permanently mentally damaged survivors

of the kidnap/institutional/drugging/torture forms of

MKULTRA activity.

Most of the survivors' torment ceased shortly after the

exposure of the non-electronic atrocities, by the U.S.

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearings,

chaired first by Senator Frank Church, then by Senator

Inouye in the late 1970s. None of the perpetrators of

those atrocities were ever brought to trial.

10 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



11/18

However, even though the perpetrators were not

punished, and the neuro-electromagnetic experiments

were not brought to light, the MKULTRA experience

demonstrates undeniably that a modern, "civilized,"

western country which places a high value on freedom,still harbors a motive pool capable of unspeakable

cruelty.

Add to the MKULTRA experience the continuing

revelations of individuals who prey on children (Jeffrey

Dahmer and John Wayne Gacy, for example) and it

becomes clear that once invasive electronic devices fall

into the hands of society's "baddest apples," the devices

will be used in the worst possible ways. That is historical

certainty, not speculation.

To sum up: We have shown that both the means and the

will do exist, and have existed for some time, to carryout what the 300 members of CAHRA and ACHES-MC

report.

But there is even more cause for concern: The basic

technologies to inject long-term silent hypnosis (which

can be used to generate hypnotic body pain) and to read

sub-vocalized word-thoughts and even images seen bythe target's eyes, can be bought or had built by the

average millionaire. Not all "millionaires" are entirely

ethical or altruistic.

Here is a list of technologies and their characteristics

which can be had by the wealthy at this point in time:

Through-wall, through-clothing, undetectable passive

11 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



12/18

radar scanners from Millivision Corp., Northamptom,

Mass. This item also allows perpetrators to see if

witnesses or test equipment is set up, and allows the

perpetrators to shut down, rather than be detected.

Radar-based life detectors, used for rescue andlaw-enforcement, but also available to stalkers and

pedophiles. Can also "illuminate" a dwelling's indoor

areas for the radar scanners above, for better visibility.

Simple "brain rhythm entrainment" machines, which are

transmitters pulsing at rates which can alter moods

without the target realizing a signal is aimed at them.

(The first of which was used during the Korean War, the

Russian "LIDA" machine.) Involuntary voice-to-skull

transmitters, capable of forcing a neighbor to listen to

inescapable sounds while trying to sleep. Modified

telephone voice converters, making a hypnotist's voice

inaudible to the target's hearing sense, but still audible to

certain parts of the mind. Can be transmitted using thepulsed microwave voice-to-skull transmitters. This

"silent sound" equipment can also be transmitted over

cable TV to the intended target, or over the target's

favorite radio channel.

For the more determined aggressive device owner, a ruse

involving less-than-ethical doctors can be set up where

the new Applied Digital Solutions Inc. satellite-trackable

implants can be surreptitiously placed during surgery for

other conditions, resulting in the whereabouts of the

targetted individual being known at all times to the

perpetrator. This type of atrocity lends itself more to

large organizations like government agencies or defenseand intelligence contractors; and for such agencies this is

12 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



13/18

not difficult to arrange.

What can be done? What should be done? CAHRA is a

non-profit organization, meaning, by law anyone

speaking or writing on behalf of CAHRA may notattempt to influence legislation either directly or

indirectly by way of influencing voters. CAHRA's role is

to supply information to others, that others may

independently take action they see as appropriate.

Speaking here as Eleanor White, world citizen, and not

as an agent of CAHRA, I suggest that the EuropeanParliament's resolutions passed on January 28, 1999, be

also passed by the U.S. Congress and the Canadian

Parliament. Excerpts from those resolutions follow:

Resolution adopted by the European Parliament,

28.1.99 Environment, security and foreign affairsA4-0005/99:

23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the

new 'non-lethal' weapons technology and the

development of new arms strategies also covered and

regulated by international conventions; ...

27. Calls for an international convention introducing a

global ban on all developments and deployments of

weapons which might enable any form of manipulation

of human beings;

Impetus for making such resolutions can be derived from

a speech by Jean-Pierre Changeux, of the Paris PasteurInstitute, published in the prestigious scinetific journal

13 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



14/18

Nature in January, 1998:

But neuroscience also poses potential risks, he said,

arguing that advances in cerebral imaging make the scope

for invasion of privacy immense. Although theequipment needed is still highly specialized, it will

become commonplace and capable of being used at a

distance, he predicted. That will open the way for abuses

such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour

and brainwashing. These are far from being science-

fiction concerns, said Changeux, and constitute "a

serious risk to society".

It is hoped the reader will take away from this article the

need to get this matter of weapons-capable electronic

devices on to the agendas of those we elect and pay to

defend our nations from involuntary experimentation

and atrocities.

Eleanor White is an engineer and technical advisor to

the Ontario-based Citizens Agaionst Human Rights

Abuses.

This article was recently published by the University of

Technology, (http://www.phys.uts.edu.au/~asearle/mind_switch/m_switch.html):

and is posted here with thanks to the Andrew Searle:

UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY

Presents

14 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



15/18

THE MIND SWITCH

Overview

The Mind Switch refers to the technology that has beendeveloped which allows a person to turn on and off an

electrical appliance, such as a desk lamp or TV in 2-3

seconds using EEG signals, without training.

Proportional control, such as turning up or down the

volume of a radio is also possible with the technology.

This research is being carried at the University ofTechnology, Sydney (UTS).

Background - General

Early in 1994 while studying the response of the brain to

environmental factors Professor Ashley Craig and Mr

Paul McIsaac of the Department of Health Sciences at

UTS, noticed an effect which appears to be common

among all persons.

That effect is an increase in a particular brain signal

when a person closes his/her eyes for more than one

second.

The important question that Ashley and Paul then asked

was could this effect be used to do something useful?, ie

- could the control of the brain signal be used, in turn, to

control something else?

At this stage Ashley contacted Professor Tony Moon,the Dean of Science at University of Technology,

15 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



16/18

Sydney (UTS), to find out if anyone could help answer

the technical questions and design a system that might

exploit the apparent change in the signal level when a

person closes his/her eyes.

Professor Moon introduced Ashley to Assoc Prof Les

Kirkup who is a associate professor in the department of

Applied Physics at UTS, who has experience in

developing electronics and instrumentation. It was

thought he could offer important input to the project.

He was initially skeptical that signals as small as thosethat are present on the scalp, (where electrodes are

placed to pick up brain activity) could be detected

reliably and analysed sufficiently quickly to allow

activation of an external device, such as a lamp or TV.

The data that had been gathered on signal levels with

eyes open and eyes closed showed that a significant

increase occurred in the 8-13Hz part of the "brain

spectrum" commonly referred to as the "alpha" region.

Les built a detection, discrimination and analysis system

based on Ashley and Paul's data and, much to his

surprise at least, the first person (Lucy) connected to thesystem showed the capability of operating a switch

which could control an electrical appliance.

Background - Technical

Serious work done on brain signals began with Berger in

1929 [Berger 1967]. Since that time the acquisition andanalysis of brain signals, referred to as

16 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



17/18

Electroencephalography (EEG) has advanced to such a

state that EEG is regularly used to assist in the diagnosis

of schizophrenia, epilepsy and brain tumours. [Geddes

and Baker, 1989].

EEG has also been used in biofeedback studies in which

subjects may learn to modify their EEG signals in

response to visual representation of their EEG signals.

This control usually take weeks or months to learn and

is not highly reliable.

The system we have developed does not rely on anylearned skill by an individual. It simply requires a person

to close his/her eyes for more than 1 second to effect

sufficient change in the signals levels to allow for the

reliable operation of a switch.

It turns out that it has been known for many years that

increase in signal level occur upon eye closure, but this

is the first example (to our knowledge) of the recognition

of its potential and the exploitation of the effect.

The system used to detect the change in signals consists

of amplifiers, filters and other signal processing elements

(full details are still classified at the moment!). As thereare other sources which can generate signals which can

interfere with brain signals (and hence cause intermittent

switching on and off of appliances) we have developed a

noise suppression system which eliminates the effect of

those noise sources.

This feature is very important as we are currentlydeveloping the technology for disabled persons (we have

17 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05



18/18

a three year grant from the Motor Accident Authority of

New South Wales, MAA) and reliability is a major issue.

The funding from MAA has allowed us to appoint Mr

Andrew Searle who has become a key figure in thetechnical developments regarding the Mind Switch. In

addition Mr Perez Moses is developing new noise

suppression techniques to be applied in this work.

Footnotes

Berger, H. 1967. On the electroencephalogram of man(trans. by P. Gloor).EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl.

28:1-350

Geddes, L. A. and Baker, L. E. 1989. Principles of

applied biomedical instrumentation 3rd ed. (Wiley, New

York): pp726-727

Copyright 2000 Joe Shea The American Reporter. All

Rights Reserved.

SIGHTIGS HOMEPAGEhttp://www.sightings.com

This Site Served by TheHostPros

18 sur 18 30/06/2011 23:05

Restrictions Needed on EM_RF Mind Control Technology

Documents

Transcript of Restrictions Needed on EM_RF Mind Control Technology