Response - University of Toronto T-Space...thalamic subnucleus size. Structurally. the thalamus is...
Transcript of Response - University of Toronto T-Space...thalamic subnucleus size. Structurally. the thalamus is...
- Response Properties of Hum&n ThaCamic
Neurons to High Frequency Micro-Stimulation
Sanjay Patra
A thesis submitted in confomity with the requirements For the degree of Master's of Science
Department of Physiology University of Toronto
Q Copyright by Sanjay Patra 2001
The author has granted a non- e x c h licence aiiowkj the National Library of Canada to reproduce, loan, distribute or seU copies of this thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats.
L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant ii la BiôlioWque nationale du Canada de reproduire¶ preter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thése sous la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format klectronique.
The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la proprieté du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protége cette thèse. thesis nor substantial exûacts &om it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced witbout the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation.
Acknowledaements
I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Jonathan Dostrovsky for giving me the
opportunity to work in such an exciting and fascinating area of study. Without his
guidance I surely would not have been able to accomplish my research goals. I would
also like to thank Ron Levy for his helpful comments and Helen Belina for her technical
assistance, throughout my study. Additionally. I would like to express sincere gratitude
to my supervisory cornmittee members, Dr. Bill Hutchison and Dr. John Yeamans for
th& insight and timely feed back.
Response Properties of Human Thalamic Neurons to High Frequency MicroStimulation
Sanjay Patra, Master's of Science Degree, 2001 Department of Physiology
University of Toronto
The mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of thalamic deep brain stimulation
(DBS) are currently not well understood. The present study directly examined the
effects of electrical stimulation in the ventrolateral thalamus on the firing of nearby
neurons. Hig h frequency micro-stimulation (1 00-333Hz; current 540uA) fmm either a
nearby stimulatirtg electrode (-250um) or directly from the recording electrode was
found to produce a prolonyed inhibition lasting up to 25s in 38 out of 74 (51%) cells.
This inhibition was usually preceded by a short period of increased bursting activity
(89%). Inhibition was observed in 29 of 36 (81 %) neurons that had a bursting firing
pattern and in 9 of 38 (24%) non-burang neurons. These findings indicate that high
frequency microstimulation in thalamus can hyperpolarize the cell membrane and inhibit
the firing of thalamic neurons and that these effects may mediate the therapeutic effects - of DBS.
1. Introduction 1 .OThe Thalamus 1
1 .O. 1 Gross Thalamic Anatornical Divisions 2 1.0.2 Ultrastructure of Thalamic Neurons 3
1.1 General Concepts of Thalamic Function 5 1.2 Thalamic Cell Types and Their Intnnsic Electrophysiological
Properties 6 1.2.1 Electrophysiology of Relay Cells 7 1.2.2 Electrophysiology of Reticular Cells 10 1.2.3 Electrophysiology of lnterneurons 11
1.3 General Thalamic Synaptic Properties 12 1.3.1 Synaptic Input and Efferent Output: Relay Cells 13 1.3.2 Synaptic Input and Efferent Output: lnterneurons 16 1.3.3 Synaptic Intrdextrathalamic Connections: Reticular
Thalamus 17 1.4 Deep Brain Stimulation General Background 18
1.4.1 Role of Thalamus in Fundional Neurosurgery 20 1.4.2 The Ventrocaudal Nucleus (Vc) 21 1.4.3 The Ventral Intemediate Nucleus (Vim) 22 1.4.4 The Anterior and Posterior Ventral Oral Nucleus (Voa,Vop) 23 1 A 5 The Anterior Thalamic Nuclei 24
1.5 Parkinson's Disease (PD) 25 1 5.1 Essential Tremor (ET) 26 15.2 Tremor and DBS 27 1.5.3 Chronic Pain and DBS 28
1.6 Curtent ldeas on Mechanisms of DBS 28
,2.0 Methods 2.1 Patient Population 2.2 Stereotaxic Technique 2.3 Microelectrode Stimulation and Recordings 2.4 Cel Populations and OfRine Analysis
2.4.1 Bursting Cell Analysis
3.0 Results
4.0 Discussion 4.1 Results From Similar Studies (GPi, SNr, and STN) 4.2 Low frequency Stimulation ~ffects in the halam mus 100 4.3 100
4.3.1 Pm Inhibition Bursüng 100 4.3.2 Long Duration Inhibition 1 03
4.4 Possible Rote of Long Duration Inhibition in Therapeutic Effects Of DBS 1 06
--- - - - - 6.5 Technkar Probïems Associated with MïCrasfimufafiôn and
Recording Studies 1 08 4.6 109
4.6.1 Future Direction (Human Studies) 1 09 4.6.2 Future Direction (Animal Studies) 1 09
List of Fiaur-es and Tables
Fiaures
Figure 1.1 : Figure 1.2: Figure 1.3: Figure 1.4: Figure 1.5: Figure 1.6: Figure 1.7: Figure 1.8: Figure 1.9: Figure 1 .IO:
Nuclei of the Dorsal Thalamus Tonic and Burst Firing Modes Voltage Dependence of LTS Cyclical Buist Firing in Thalamic Relay Cells I* and IT Inactivation and Activation Curves Connections between Thalamus and Cortex Glomerular Synaptic Arrangement Thalamic Relay Cell Afferent Inputs Thalamic lntemeuron and Reticular Cell Afferent ln puts Effects of Stimulation in GPi
Figure 2.1 : Sagittal Section of Thalamus Figure 2.2: Stereotactic Frame Assembly Figure 2.3: Electrode Tiack Reconstruction ~igure 2.4: Graphical Characterization of LTS Bursts ~igure 2.5: Visual and Graphical llustrations of LTS Bursts
Figure 3.1 :
Figure 3.2: Figure 3.3:
Figure 3.4:
Figure 3.5: ,.Figure 3.6: Figure 3.7: Figure 3.8: Figure 3.9:
Effect of Hig h Frequency Stimulation from Recording Electrode Short Duration lnhibition Effects of High Frequency Stimulation h m Recording Electrode on Two Cells Effects of High Frequency Stimulation from Nearby Stimulating Electrode Effects of Stimulation on Burst Size The Effect of Current lntensity on lnhibition Effect of Current lntensity on Pm lnhibition Bursting Effect of Train Length on lnhibition Effect of Frequency on Inhibition
Figure 4.1 : Model for Pre lnhibition Bursting and Long Duration ln hibition
Tables
Table 1.1 : Summary of Thalamic Subnuclei Table 2.1 : Patient and farget Information Table 3.1: Summary Data for High Frequency Stimulation Table 3.2: Patient and Subnuclei Cell Grouping Table 3.3: Effect of Stimulation on Bursting and Non-bursting Cells
----a = - - List of Abbreviations
AC ACh AP ATNIAN BF BC CAT CCK DBS DT EMG EPSP ET GABA Glu GP GPe GPi HFS Int IPSP ISI Ki LGN Lpo LTS MD
.,-MCP MRI NA NO NOT NR P PC PBR PD PF PVG REKRN RF STN SMA SN
anterior commissure acetyl choline action potentials anterior thalamus basal forebrain bursüng cell wmputer aided tomography chole ycysto kinin deep brain stimulation dorsal thalamus electromyog ram excitatory post synaptic potential essential tremor gamma aminobutyric acid glutamate globus pallidus globus pallidus externat segment globus pallidus intemal segment high frequency stimulation intemeumn inhibitory post synaptic potential inter-spike interval kinesthetic lateral geniculate nucleus latempola ris low-threshold calcium spike mectialls dorsalis mid commisural point magnetic resonance imaging nokdrenaline nitric oxide nucleus of the optic tract no response paraesthesia posterior commissure parabrachial region Parkinson's disease projected field periventricular grey matter thalamic reticular nucleus receptive field subthalamic nucleus supplementary motor area substantia nigra
WC SlUr STT Ta vc Vim VIP Voa Vol VOP
substanfia nigra pam compacta substantb nigra pars reticulata spinothalamic tract tactile ventrocaudal nucleus ventral intemediate nucleus vasoactive intestinal polypeptide anterior ventral oral nucleus voluntary posterior ventral oral nucleus
Introduction
Electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic method applied for the
treatment of chronic pain and, rnost commonly, for movement disorders. More
recently, DBS has been applied for treatment of psychiatric neurosis (Nuttin et al., 1999)
and epilepsy. Essential tremor, Parkinson's tremor, and other symptorns related to
Parkinson's disease are the predominant movement disorders treated. Deep brain
stimulation in the human thalamus has recently been employed as the treatrnent of
choice for tremor associated with the aforementioned movement disorders. DBS is a
more versatile and safer alternative to making thalamic lesions because its parameters
can be adjusted to optimize therapeutic benefits and there are fewer adverse side
effects (reviewed by Tasker and Kiss, 1995).
It has been hypothesized that high frequency DBS (>lOOHz) results in inhibition of
the motor output of the thalamus (Gildenberg and Tasker, 1998). The mechanisms by
which this might occur, however, still remain a mystery. Knowledge of the mechanisms r
by which the therapeutic effects of DBS are mediated might provide the means to
optimize the stimulation parameters or target lOcaI'~ation when impianting DBS
electroâes. This knowledge may also provide greater insight into the pathophysiology
of the various rnovement disorders.
1.0 The Thalamus
The origin of the word thalamus is from the Greek thalamos, meaning inner brida1
chamber. This is appropriate if one considers the thalamus' central role in providing
information to the cerebml cortex. Fundionally, it can be divided into several nuclei that
---- -
contain neurons, which relay visual, auditory, and somatosensory information to the
cortex. The olfactory system represents the only pathway of sensation that does not
relay through the thalamus before it can enter the cortex. Generally, the thalamus
receives contralateral sensory information, which is then pmjected to the ipsilateral
cortex. It is located lateral to the third ventricle on each side of the head. In the
evolution of mammals, each area of the neocortex depends on a parücular thalamic
projection and the size of the neocortical area is generally related to the size of the
thalamic subnucleus size. Structurally. the thalamus is small compared to the cerebral
hemispheres (reviewed by Tasker and Kiss, 1995; Sherman and Guillery. 2001).
1.0.1 Gross Thalamic Anatomical Divisions
The classical division of the mammalian thalamus is into three divisions. The
epithalamus, donal thalamus, and ventral thalamus still serve as a fundional basis for
the descriptive anatomy. The epithalamus includes the anterior and posterior
paraventricular nuclei, the medial and lateral habenular nuclei, and the pineal gland.
These, neither project to, nor recehre input from the cerebral cortex. The ventral >-
thalamus is composed of the reticular nucleus, ventral lateral geniculate nucleus and
the nucleus of the zona incerta. The nuclei of the Fields of Forel are sometimes also
included. These nuclei receive fibers h m , but do not send fibers to the cortex. The
dorsal thalamic nuclei comprise the major part of thalamus and include the following
nudear groups: anterior, medial, intralaminar, ventral, posterior, lateral, pulvinar, medial
geniculate, and dorsal lateral geniculate (Jones, 1985). All of these groups both receive
h m , and send fibers to the cortex. The dorsal thalamus nuclei contain a certain degree
of cellular and synaptic uniformity that is lacking in the other two regions. The functional
amas of thalamic deep brain stimulation are located in the ventral tier of the dorsal
thalamic nuclei and will be more fully discussed later (Fig. 1 .l, Table 1.1).
1.0.2 Ultrastructure of Thalamlc Neurons
The morphological studies of the thalamus have identified three major types of
thalarnic cells: The thalamic relay neuron, the local circuit neuron (interneurons), and
the reticular thalamic neuron.
Almost all thalamic nuclei project to the cortex (reviewed by Sherman and Guillery.
2001 ). Thalamocortical nuclei are also referred to as first order nuclei. First order
nuclei are defined as those sending messages to the cortex about what is happening in
the sub-cortical parts of the brain, and higher order nuclei es those that provide a
transthalamic relay from one part of the cortex to another. Although in primates higher
order nuclei fomi more than half of the thalamus, Crst order nuclei are generally thought
of as the main relay cells to the cerebral cortex (Crabhee, 1999). Most of thern (85-
90%) have medium to large sized soma (area: 300-400um2), bushy, highly radial
dendritic trees, and project with high conduction velocities to medium (IV-Ill) and deep - (VI) cortical layers. About 10 - 15% of them are half the sire of the aforementioned
cells and pioject to the superficial (1-11) layers of the conesponding cortical region at
slower conduction velocities. The initial effect of afferent stimulation on thalamocortical
neurone is excitation. Glutamate andlor aspartate is the neumtransmitter that most
researchen believe to be involved in corücdhalamic projections.
Immunohistochemical studies wrnbined wiai retrograde transport of horseradish
pemxidase have shown choleycystokinin (CCKFlike and vasoactive intestinal
polypeptide (VIP)-like transmitters inside some medial and intralaminar central medial
-- --- --. neurons projeding to the cerebral cortex or striatum. The excitatory effects on the
cerebral cortex can be induced through both glutamate and VIP (Steriade and Llinas,
1988).
A simple way to classify cells in the dorsal thalamus is to distinguish cells with
axons that project to the telencephalon from those that have locally ramifying axons.
Neurons with local axonal ramifications (intemeurons) generally have spheroid or ovoid
somas with cet1 bodies around the same size (cross sectional area of soma -200 um2)
as the smallest thalamocortical relay neurons. The dendrites have vesicle wntaining
synaptic appendages. Previous studies have shown that up to 30% of thalamic neurons
in primates and carnivores have intemeuron-like properties with short axons that are
GABAergic. Recent studies suggest that this nurnber may be an underestimate. The
primary contacts of the GABAergic teminals are on thalamocortical cells (Steriade and
Llinas, 1988).
The thalamic reticular nucleus (RE) is a sheet of cells that sumund much of the
dorsal thalamus and lies betweemit and the cortex. The nucleus is bordered medially by
'the extemal medullary lamina and laterally by the intemal capsule. Because of its
position, the RE is perforated by al1 axonal tracts from the cortex to the dorsal thalamus.
Most corticothalamic axons send collaterals to the area of the RE associated with the
region of the thalamus that it receives afferents from. The collaterals are oriented
perpandicular to aie direction of the axon and parallel to the retiwlar plane. The other
major afierents to the RE nucleus corne frorn layer VI of the cortex, brainstem reticular
formation, and the basal forebrain (Crabtree, 1999). RE neurons are classified by their
medium to large soma (300400 urn2). Also, they have several thick primary dendrites
-- -
that give rise to secondary, tiny branches, covered by long appendages that project to
other RE neurons. The RE neuron axons project to thalamic neurons and not to the
cortex. Studies involving double-labeling of reticular neurons with fluorescent tracen
show that over 90% of axons originating in a given region of RE project to a distinct
thalamic group. Almost al1 of the RE neurons in the rat, cat. and monkey are
GABAergic. They not only project to thalamocortical cells but to local intemeurons as
well (Steriade and Llinas, 1988). Visual, somatosensory, and auditory secton of the RE
share many of the same organizational features (Crabtree, 1999).
1.1 .O General Concepts of Thalamic Function
The thalamus was traditionally thought of as the relay for sensory information. It
should not however, be regarded as just a set of passive relay nuclei. It operates as a
gate-master that can be cortically and sub-corücally modulated through changes in
neuronal states. These states act as intnnsic wrnponenk of thalamic networks that
mark the entrance of information into the forebrain. The main cornponents of the
networks are wmposed of thalam6-cortical, wrtico-thalamic, and cortico-reticular /"
thalamic connections. The networks can control the behavioral state that an individual .
is in, as is seen in the rhythmic oscillations of thalamic neurons that characterite the
depressed responsiveness observed in slowinrave sleep. A shift in the network
properties can push the thalamic neurons out of the oscillatory mode into a more
passive mode that responds linearîy to driving inputs, and characterizes alert wakeful
behavior (Steriade and Llinas, 1988). This will be discussed further in the pages ahead.
--- -- - 1.2.6 Thalamic Cell Types And Thek htrinsic ETec€rophysiological
ProperUes
Although the thalamus is a highly complex structure, surprisingly the
electrophysiology of thalamic neurons is relatively unifonn. It is now generally known
that al1 thalamic neurons are capable of existing in two functional states. This is
dependent on the inactivation state of a voltagedependant calcium current, Ir, which
operates via a T-type calcium channel that was first described in inferior olivary neurons
of guinea-pigs (Llinas and Yarom, 1 Q8la,b). In the tonic mode cells are able to respond
to an input with sustained firing of sodium-generated unitary action potentials and
increased excitatory inputs are reflected in increased firing rates. In the bursting mode,
cells respond in discret0 bursts with short intenpike intervals (Fig. 1.2). In the bursting
mode a larger EPSP or IPSP does not necessarily elicit larger or smaller bursts. Thus,
the input-output relationship for tonic firing is almost linear, whereas that for burst firing
is nonlinear. The neurons switch from one state to another through changes in
membrane potential, each state being dependent on different voltagegated ionic
conductances. If the cell membrane is held in a depolarired state of more than -60mV,
the neuron responds in the repetitive firing mode via the sodium action potentials.
However, at membrane potentials more negetive than -65rnV, depolarkation of the cell
results in short bursts of action potentials via an inactivating all-or-none ca2* dependent
spike (Llinas and Jahnsen. 1982 and 1984). More specifically, if the cell fs more
depolarized than -6OmV for 50-100 msec, the calcium current is inactivated.
Hyperpolarization for 50-1 00 msec de-inadvates the calcium current, which can
subsequently generate a low thmshold calcium spike (LTS). If an LTS is large enough,
-4- - il is accornpanied by a burst of action Ijofentials Cf-fa) rMRig on its cresf. The time
course of de-inactivation of the LTS channet has a sigmoidal shape between 6 5 and - 75mV. More hyperpolaiized membrane potentials are capable of generating larger
LTSs and subsequently larger bursts. Thus, there is a monotonic relationship between
LTS amplitude and the number of action potentials in a burst (Fig. 1.3). Furthemore,
the LTS can have a refractory penod of up to 200 msec (Llinas and Jahnsen, 1984).
The de-inactivation of LTS has also been shown to be time dependent. Hyperpdarizing
pulses of increasing duration pmduce graded dainactivation (Deschenes et al., 1984).
Also, shorter pulses can sum to trigger larger LTSs (Steriade et al.. 1985). It is clear
that thalamic neurons can function as relay systems or as oscillators or resonators.
1.2.1 Electrophysiology of Relay Cells
All thalamic relay cells are capable of switching between the relay and burst mode.
Besides the ionic conductance that underlies the fast sodium spikes several other
conductances are also present.
The LTS pfays an important role in relay cells. Initially, it was thought that the - location of the LTS channels was concentrated on the cell body (Deschenes et al.,
1984), but there is mounting evidence that they are preferentially distributed on the
dendrites of the relay cells (Destexhe et al., 1998; Zhan et al., 2000). Although h
inactivates very quickly, evidence in cats indicates that activation requires a moderate
rate of depolarkation. If the rate of depdarization is too slow, a thalamic relay cell can
be taken h m a hypeipdarized state in which It is fully dejnactivateâ to a depolarized
state in which lT is fully inactivated and tonic firing ensues without ever firing a low-
threshold calcium spike. The rate of rise of EPSPs generated from ionotropic receptors
-A-- Cproduce fast transient potential changes) is fast enougtr to activate tT but EPSPs
generated by metabotropic receptors (produce slower sustained potential changes) may
inactivate IT.
A voltage dependent, non-inactivating, or very slowly inactivating sodium
conductance GNap), is also present in thalamic murons. This channel generates a slow
soâium-mediated depolarking pulse which is capable of generating a slow rebound
depolarization and plays an impoitant role in the 1OHz oscillation seen in thalamic cells
(Jahnsen and Llinas, 1984a). The activation of the LTS itself leads to activation of
voltage and calcium dependent potassium conductances. They act to repolarize the
cell to its former hyperpolarized level, thereby initiating the process of IT de-inactivation.
Another conductance that can be dependent on LTS is the lh conductance. It is
activated by membrane hyperpolarization and de-activated by depolarization. I t is
sometimes called the 'sag current" because it slowly (activation time constant of ~ 2 0 0
msec) allows the membrane to drift towards more depolarized levels. The combination
of Ir, the above-mentioned potassium conductances, and lh can lead to rhythmic
#bursting, which is often seen in recardings from in vitro slice prepaiations of thalamus
(Fig. 1.4). The length of the hyperpolarkation that generates the Ih rebound
phenornenon was found to be modulated by an eady potassium cunent, lA (Jahnsen
and Llinas, 1984a). lA is generated by a voltagedependent potassium conductance (or
a combination of multiple potassium conductances since there are other members to
the IA family) in most cells in the central nervous system (Adams, 1982; Rogawski.
1985; Storm, 1990; McComick 1991). This is different from the voltage and calcium-
dependent potassium conductances previously mentioned in ternis of its kinetics and
lower activation threshold. There are a number o f similanlhs befween i~ and t. IA has
the same three states; activated, deactivated, and de-inactivated. In thalamic relay cells,
the voltage dependence of lA is similar in shape to that of lT but shifted in the
depolarized direction (Fig. 1.5) (Pape et al., 1994). Furthemore, IA is inactivated at
depolarized membrane potentials and activated via depolarization from a
hyperpolarized state. In both conductance's activation occurs at a much faster time
course than deactivation or deinactivation (McConnick, 1991 ). However, their cunents
operate in opposite directions. Because of this, the two currents would tend to offset
one another if both were acüvated at the same time. Whether a postsynaptic potential
activates one or both depends on the initial membrane voltage and the temporal
properties of the voltage changes. Both channels have slightly different temporal
properties. If the membrane starts off sufficiently hyperpolarized to completely de-
inactivate both conductances, then a depolarization would activate Ir before activating
IA. This would result in a low-threshold spike with a burst of sodium spikes Ming its
crest. The delayed IA activation would only subtly affect the LTS. Notice from figure 1.5
?hat there is a limited membrane potential range, near -70 mV, for which Ir is thoroughly
inactivateâ and IA is slightly de-inadivated. An EPSP (or other depolarizing event)
elicited from this range of membrane potentials will activate a small IA without any IT, so
only tonic firing is possible. However, the tA will serve to slow down the EPSP and
could abolish sodium spikes al1 together (McConick, 1991 ; Rush and Rinzel, 1994).
The calcium spiking can occur at a variety of frequencies, typically at 1 to 3 Hz, the
amal value depending on other parameters such as the presence of local feedback
inhibitory circuits that may becorne involved during rhythmic bursting (cm be seen at
- frequencies up to I O Hz). This burscng can onty be ïnfémpfed if a sufficienffy strong
and prdonged depolarization inactivates Ii and prevents lh from activating.
lntradendritic recordings in thalamic cells have revealed a voltagedependent high-
threshold calcium conductance that triggers all-or-none depolarizing responses that are
followed by the activation of a calciumdependent potassium conductance (GK(CS))
(Steriade, Jones and Lllnas, 1990). Phannacological deactivation (Le. via receptor
antagonists) of these channels results in tells firing at very high tonic rates.
Basecl on these conductances and in vitro studies, only rhythmic bursting should occur.
In reality three types of bursthg are observed: 1. Arrhythmic; 2. Rhythmic and
synchronized, meaning that large populations of neurons would fire with the same
rhythm and in synchrony, which occurs during slow wave sleep and certain fons of
epilepsy; 3. Rhythmic and non-synchronous. This indicates that other factors and
conductances must corne into play.
1.2.2 Reticular Cells
Reticular cells are also capable of displaying a variety of conductances besides r regular sodium action potentials (Huguenard and Prince, 1992). The low-threshold
calcium conductance in reticular cells is similar to that of relay cells. The reticular cells
can exist in both the relay and tonic modes. However, there are some quantitative
differences.
Reticular cells tend to have slower activation and inactivation kinetics than relay
cells (Huguenard and Prince, 1992). Furaieme, the inactivation of h is voltage
independent. This increases the amount of time the LTS is activated thus, making for
longer LTSs with more action potentials riding the crest. Reticular cells also need larger
depolarization for activation of IT than in relay ceL. However. this may be an
experimental artifact that is caused by the difference in cable properties between the
two cell types. Since the reticular cells have more expansive dendrites, in vitro
stimulation of the cell body may result in more current leakage. Thus, more current
would need to be applied to reticular cell bodies to depolarire the lT channels, which
have been shown to be located on the more distal dendrites, than in relay cells. One
final important distinction between reticular and relay cells is the occurrence of burst
firing. The activity of bursting cells in the reticular nucleus has not been recorded in
awake animals. Whether reticular cells exhibit both response modes during normal,
alert behavior still needs to be resolved.
It is unclear how many voltage- or ion-sensitive membrane conductances exist in
reticular cells due to the lack of published studies. For instance. the presence of IA has
not been confimed or denied. Further understanding of the intrinsic properties of
reticular cells is needed to explain their firing patterns, which can have a powerful
impact on relay cells.
- ' 1.2.3 lnterneurons
lnterneurons are much more difficult to record h m due ta their small size. There
are very few criteria to distinguish interneurons from relay cells during recordings. An
important issue is whether al1 thalamic intemeurons can exhibit action potentials. It is
possible that axonless intemeurons exist that do not fire action potentials. but clearîy
some possess axonal outputs and fire action potentials. Regardless of the issue of
action potentials. recent evidence indicates that the output from presynaptic dendritic
terininals can be acüvafed wRhouf an action pofen€îaL This will be discussed in the
following section.
Previously it was thought that interneumns did not posses calcium T channels,
however recent evidence suggests that they do. The interaction behnreen IA and Ir
tends to mask the LTS. The reason for this is the differences between voltage
dependencies and peak amplitudes of these conductances. Figure 1.58 shows the
relative overlap in the voltage dependencies of intemeurons compared to relay neurons.
The relative amplitudes, the I* to IT ratio, is much larger in intemeurons than in relay
cells, thus, IA can swamp an evoked LTS. However, m e n t studies suggest that LTS
bursting activity does occur in intemeurons so the issue is not cleariy resolved
(Sherman and Guillery, 2001).
1.3 General Thalamic Synaptic Properties
The thalamocortical neurons, intemeurons, and RE neurons make
interconnections (Fig. 1.6). Different modes of interactions among the cells account for
the difierent states of cunsciousness. The reticular nucleus may interpose between the - cartico-thalamic neurons and neurons of the dorsal thalamus. f hese circuits can not
only affect states of consciousness but sensory processing during the awake state
(Sherman, 2001 ; Crabtree, 1999).
Contacts between thalamocortical and intemeurons cm occur via 'synaptic
islands". These areas are encapsulated by glial sheets referred to as glomenili. The
glomenili contain two pre-synaptic and two post-synaptic elements. The pre-synaptic
inputs from subcortical afferents are made through their axon tenninals which contact
both the thalamocortical cell body and the presynaptic dendrite of a local intemeuron.
-Ti%e6endrites ofthe infemeumns are a h a presynaptic etemenf thaf makes
GABAergic contact with the thalamocortical dendrite. These presynaptic dendrites may
outnumber the teminals of ascending afferent axons by a factor of 4 (Jones, 1985).
The synaptic contacts of prethalamic afferent axons can also fom triads. This occurs
when the prethalamic afferent contacts not only the thalamocortical cell but an adjacent
presynaptic intemeuron dendrite as well. The extraglomerular neuropil contains
teminals of corticothalamic axons heving mund and small vesicles that make
asymmetrical synaptic contact with proximal and distal parts of the relay cell dendrites
and the dendrites of intemeurons (Steriade and Llinas, 1988) (Fig. 1.7).
One basic cornponent of thalamic cells is the presence of both ionotropic and
metabotropic receptors. The patterns of presynaptic stimulation needed to acüvate
these receptors are quite different. Single action potentials are generally able to
activate ionotropic receptors. On the other hand. activation of metabotropic receptors
requires long stimulus trains. These functional differences between the receptor types
could have implications on LTS generation. The response of an ionotropic receptor will
,-tend to generate a transient EPSP or IPSP that generally decays in 10-20 msec. This
time period is too short for de-inactivation of Ir which requires a hyperpolarization for at
least 50 msec. Metabotropic receptors however, c m produce more sustained EPSP's
and IPSP's, some lasting > 100 msec, which is ideal for Ir de-inactivation (Sherman and
Guillery, 2001 ).
1.3.1 Synaptic Input and Efferent Output: Relay Cells
Figure 1.8 shows the neurotransmitters and postsynaptic recepton for known
inputs to relay cells of the lateral geniculate nudeus (LON) and ventral posterior
nucleus. Driving inputs can be described as inputs coniaining the main information to
be relayed to the cortex. More specifically, they are the afferents that detemine the
receptive field properties of the relay cells. First order-relay nuclei primarily receive the
sub-cortical inputs (i.e. retinal inputs to the LGN) and send messages to the cortex
about what is happening in the sub-cortical parts of the brain, whereas second-order
relays primarily receive cortical inputs h m layer V. The response mode which the relay
cell is in (burst or tonic) will detemine to a large extent the type of information that is
transmitted to the cortex. The question that has not been clearly answered yet is what
capacity do driving inputs have in modulating the response mode. Indirect experimental
evidence suggests that the driving inputs do not play a role in controllhg response
mode. The theoretical reason for this is that driving inputs preferentially adivate
ionotropic and not metabotropic glutamate receptors. A train of EPSP's generated by
ionotropic glutamate receptors could, by temporal summation, produce a sustained
depolarization long enough for Ir inactivation. In the LGN for example. if the ionotropic
EPSP (generated from a single pulse retinal stimulation) lasts for 25 msec. then a
'-summation of 40 Hz is needed to inactivate IT. This is a reasonable rate for retinat
input. However, activation of retinal afferents also produces multi-synaptic lPSPs that
counteract the EPSPs reducing their latency h m 25rnsec to around 10 msec. In this
situation it is not clear that even 1OOHz stimulations would produce EPSPs sustained
enough to inactivate IT. Another important criterion is the rate of EPSP (or IPSP)
production. If it is t w fast Ir will be activated (the stimulus will act as a depolarizing
pulse typically needed to activate Ir) before it c m be inactivated. In this case. the EPSP
will have to be sustained enough to inactivate IT following the LTS burst. The
--- - aforernentioned infinafion suggesfs t h € drnrlng hputs are Iikely not to change the
response mode of relay cells. However, it is important to realize that this has only been
studied in the LON of rats. Thus, more empirical evidence is needed before this can be
generalized to other thalarnic nuclei (Sherman and Guillery, 2001).
Relay cells also receive GABAergic inputs from interneurons and the thalamic
reücular nucleus. All evidence suggests that GABA is inhibitory in the thalamus. There
are two receptor types: GABh (ionotropic), and GABAe (metabotropic). The population
of thalamic reticular cells activate both receptors types on relay cells (Fig. 1.8). There is
evidence that G A B h receptors but not GABAB are activated by interneurons. GABAA
receptors operate via a chloride channel. This does not produce very large lPSPs since
the reversal potential for the chloride ion is atound -70 to -75mV, which is close to
resting membrane potential. It does, however, clamp the membrane at that potential,
dampening subsequent EPSPs. Activation of GABAe receptors works via increasing
potassium ion conductance. Evidence suggests it increases potassium leak
conductance. This tends to move-the membrane potential to -1 OOmv and has less
<èffect on other conductances. Another major difference in the receptor types is the tirne
course of adion (Koch et al., 1 982). GABAA effects lasts for around 1 0 msec whereas
GA0h.s effeds last for up to 100 times longer (100-1 000msec) (Reviewed by Sherman
and Guillery, 2001 ).
Although GABAA recepton are unlikely to produce a shift to the bursting response
mode, due to receptor kinetics, there is evidence that this occurs. Activation of GA&
through reticular nucleus cells is capable of generating LTS bursts in relay cells. This
tias been observed in various states of sleep where large numbers of reticular cells Sre
synchrcinously in bursts. The prorongeci bursts of action Wtentials from the RE produce
a sufficientfy pmlonged IPSP to deinactivate Ir and adivate fh. This was evident even
in the presence of GABh receptor blockers.
Relay cells also receive synaptic input from cortical layer VI axons. These
synapses are generally glutarnatergic and involve both ionotropic and metabotropic
teceptors. The cortical synapses are also more distally located on the dendritic tree
than subcortical afferents (see fig 1.8). Evidence from the LON suggests that
cor&icogeniculate synapses primarily adivate type4 metabotropic glutamate recepton
on relay cells. This generates slow onset EPSPs (via potassium channels) which can
last for more than hundreds of seconds (McConnick and Von Krosigk, 1992). These
metabotropic EPSPs could result in inactivation of lT without ever activating it. pushing
the cell into the tonic mode (Gutienez et al.. 1999).
The brainstem also sends modulatory inputs to relay cells (Fitzpatrick et al., 1989).
The parabrachial region of the brainstem includes the midbrain and pontine tegmentum
surrounding the brachium conjunctivum. Cholinergie parabrachial inputs are capable of
'activating both ionotropic (nicotinic) and metabotropic (muscurinic) receptors in
thalamus, generating fast or slow EPSPs respectively (McCormick. 1992).
Metabotropic nitric oxide (NO) and noradrenaline (Fitzpatrick et al., 1989) inputs are
also part of the parabrachial pathway although their exact modes of action are less well
understood (Revieweâ by Sherman and Guillery. 2001).
The relay cells generally project to layer IV of the correspondhg cortical area. A
collateral of the axon is also sent to the RE. This is the same area in RE that sends
GABAergic axons back to that relay ceIl. Most probably al1 thalamocortical pathways
-
are topographically organized. This is most readily seen in the visual, auditory and
somatosensory pathways (Crabtree, 1999). Fuither details on the specific cortical
connections of thalamic nuclei relevant to deep brain stimulation will be discussed in the
following sections.
1.3.2 Synaptic Input and Efferent Output: lnterneurons
lntemeurons have two distinct and functionally independent innervation zones that
are electrically isolated from each other. The cell body and proximal dendrites are
functionally distinct from the other more distal dendrites (Fig. 1.9). lntemeurons have
membranes that are more leaky to cunent than relay cells. This makes transmission of
changes in distal (dendrites) membrane potentials to the cell body very weak. Sub-
cortical axons innervate intemeurons. It appean that the more distal group of teminals
receive the su bcortical afferents via the aforementioned triad formation. Su bsequentl y,
subcortical excitation of intemeuron presynaptic dendrites produce EPSPs. The
intemeuron EPSPs then cause GABA release on the adjacent relay cell dendrites.
Cholinergie parabrachial inputs have an inhibitory effect on the proximal and distal - presynaptic dendrites of interneurons via muscarinic (metabotropic ACh) receptors.
These same axons send afferents to adjacent relay cell dendrites where they have an
excitatory effect (Sherman and Guillery, 2001). Thus, the net effect of parabrachial
inputs ont0 relay cells seems to be excitatory, either directly, or through disinhibition via
interneu rons.
1.3.3 Synaptic Intralextrathalamic Connections: Reticular Thalamus
(RE)
The RE is organized in a conventional fashion, integrating synaptic inputs to
produce axonal outputs (Fig. 1.98). Figure 9B illustrates the inputs and also points out
the gaps of knowledge about reticular cell input. There are a variety of functions for the
reticular nucleus that have been proposed. Fint, it is a modulator of sensory
transmission through the dorsal thalamus. Secondly, it is an enhancer of selected
sensory transmission through the dorsal thalamus. Finally, it is a regulator of receptive
field properties of donal thalamic neurons. These functions are not considerad to be
mutually exclusive. Each of them relies on the inhibitory, or hyperpolarizing effects
exerted by reticular cells on thalamocortical relay cells (Reviewed by Crabtree, 1999).
The various sensory sectors of the RE have similar organizational features. A
thalamic reticular sector is defined as a region that receives projections from a particular
dorsal thalamic nucleus and the cortical area that is reciprocally connected to that
nucleus (Sherman and Guillery, 2001)(See Fig. 1.6). It also sends axonal projections - back to the same dorsal thalamic region. Initielly, the topographical organization of the
reticutar sectors was thought to refled a general cortical organizahn where adjacent
areas along the cortical sheet would be represented by adjacent sectors along the
reticular sheet. It is now known that functionally related cortical areas can send
projections to one reticular sector. Also, a particular reticular sector can send axons to
multiple functionally related dorsal thalamic nuclei and can receive afferents from
functionally related dorsal thalamic regions. Afferents from the dorsal thalamus provide
driving inputs (inputs determining receptive field properties) while cortical inputs tend to
-a- . - - - - be modubfory (affecthg intrinsic celluïar sfafes te. bu=€ vs fonic mode) (Reviewed by
Crabtree, 1999). Sensory cells in the dorsal thalamus and reticular nucleus fom a
network of excitatory-inhibitory interconnections. Furthemore, the sensory sectors
contain rnap that are related to inputs from cortical areas and inputs from first-order
thalamic nuclei.
1.4 Deep Brain Stimulation General Background
The discovery of electrical excitability began with an argument between two
ltalians named Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta. The argument was over why frog
legs twitched when placed between two different conducting metals. Galvani was
convinced that this was due to intemal electricity in the fmg whereas Volta thought the
metals themselves were producing ebctricity. Galvani finally proved with a transected
nerve (which could produce a muscle twitch in the frog upon application). that there was
indeed an intrinsic electrical potential in the frog (reviewed by Yeomans, 1990).
The first endeavor to electrically map the human brain started in 1864 by a
physician named Theodor Fritsch; He noticed that touching the cerebral cortex could - produce muscle tuvitches in the opposite side of the body. The initial mapping studies
developed out of curiosity and were analyzed further to aid in the fundional localization
of brain areas. By the earîy 1900's the first stemtaxic instruments were engineered by
Honley and Clark. and by the 1920's and 1930's Walter Rudolf Hess devised a method
for electrical stimulation of deep brain structures in a freely moving animal. This
tedinique allowed for permanent implantation of the electtodes into various brain
regions (reviewed by Yeomans, 1990). Electncal stimulation became a major t d used
to map brain regions for surgeries such as thalamotomies to treat tremor. Eventually.
chronic stimulating electrodes were used to treat chronic pain patients. Deep Brain
Stimulation in the motor thalamus was first successfully attempted to treat Parkinson's
related tremor by Benabid in 1987. Currently, implantation of chronic stimulating
electrodes into patients who suffer from chronic pain and a variety of movement
disorders such as Parkinson's disease are being employed for their very significant
therapeutic effect.
A growing number of human studies of electrical stimulation have been reported
from patients undergoing awake, open brain surgery. The evoked sensations
generated by stimulation can aid the surgeon in localking specific brain regions that
would othewise be next to impossible to separate. For example, stimulations, in the
somatosensory cortex can evoke parasthesias (tingling on the skin), in the motor cortex
can evoke twitches, and in the auditory or visual cortices can evoke sensations of
simple tones or lights. The important technique of microelectrode recordings,
developed in the 1950's. allowed neurophysiologists to record action potentials from
neurons in the brain. This information has also been valuable in identifying brain - regions as will be illustrated in the next section. Microstimulation was developed in
order to stimulate as few neurons as possible to detemine the effect that minimal
eledrical stimulation had. This technique has allowed for developing brain maps with
increased spatial resolution although the rnechanism(s) of action are still not resolved
(Yeomans, 1990).
1 A.1 Role of Thalamus in Functional Neurosurgery
Functional stereotactic neurosurgery for the treatment of pain and movement
disorden has been perfonned since the 1940's. It was developed to treat diseases by
----- L --
the most minimally invasive means (before this many of the procedures were perfonned
under open surgery). In 1947, Spiegel and Wycis perfonned the first hurnan
stereotacüc operation (in the globus pallidus and thalamus). At that time, the technique
was made possible by radiological methods that helped define intemal cerebral
landmarks. Presently. MRI and CAT sans perform this task. The stereotactic frame
allows the neurosurgeon to put the cerebral landmarks (the anterior and posterior
commissure points are the commonly used landmarks) in tenns of an X, Y, and Z
coordinate space. A microdrive mounteâ on the frame allows foi precise movement of
a micro- or macro-electrode through the person's brain (described in greater detail in
the methods section). Using this technique, the precise location of deep brain
structures can be mapped by using both receptive field and projected field information.
Microelectrodes have the advantage of being able to record from individual neurons
which allows receptive field data to be obtained. A projeded field is the area of
perceived sensation on the surface of the body when stimulating in a particular brain
region.
..- Shortly after the first stereotactic case was perfomed, lesions were made in the
ventral posterornedial nucleus and the center-median nucleus for the treatment of
thalamic pain. Since then the thalamus has been central in the neurosurgical treatment
of pain and movement disorders (Reviewed by Gildenberg and Tasker, 1998).
Hassler's nomenclature will be used from this point to describe the various sub-nuclei of
the thalamus tageteâ in functional neurosurgery and DBS (Table 1.1) (Tasker and Kiss.
1995).
L -. -
1.4.2 The Ventrocaudal Nucleus (Vc)
The main thalamic somatosensory area that receives input from the madial
lemniscus is known as the ventrocaudal (Vc, in Hasslen nomenclature) nucleus.
During intraoperative rnicroelectrode recordings this thalamic area is identified by its
cells with large amplitudes (extracellularly recorded action potentials), and by the
presence of tactile receptive fields (RFs). More specifically, cells in this area can
respond to a light touch, light brushing of glabrous skin with cotton, a hair, or a puff of
air. These cells can be rapidly or slowly adapting and their receptive fields are
contralateral exœpt for the areas of the upper and lower lip which may be bilateral. The
sue of the RFs can range from a few millimetes to centimeteis in diameter. The
somatotopy is arranged medial to laterally. Stimulation through a microelectrode or
macmelectrode in this region can evoke paraesthesia's (sensation of tingling or
numbness) in the contralateral side of the body. The locations of the evoked sensations
are termed projective fields (PFs) and are usually located in similar regions as the RFs.
When micmstimulating in the lip and manual digit regions of Vc, the threshold for such a - response can be as low as 2uA (at 300Hz 1 second stimulus trains). Larger tipped
electrodes (such as macroelectroûes) are capable of producing a wider cunent spread
and larger PFs.
Deep Bmin Stimulation is generally applied to Vc when treating chronic pain. The
stereotactic implantation of a chronic stimulating electrode is put in such a site that
stimulation produces paraesthesia in the patientas area of pain. Before the DBS
technique was applied to Vc, destructive lesions were used to treat pain. The
neumsurgeons reasoned that making lesions hem, that were somatotopographically
%.. - - -
re~ateâ to the patient's nociceptive pain, shoü~d re~ievë mat pain. ~ h e pain relief that
was recorded after such a surgery was short lived and the incidence of resulting central
pain was high. Later on it was found that lesion-making in the medial thalamus was
more effective for pain relief. Lesions in Vc also result in loss of tactile sensibility
(Tasker and Kiss, 1995).
1.4.3 The Ventral Intermediate Nucleus (Vim)
The ventral intemediate nucleus (Vim) is the main relay for the cerebellum and for
deep and kinesthetic somatosensory input. It is commonly believed that the VcNirn
border separates superficial tactile from kinesthetic input (reviewed by Tasker and Kiss,
1995). Like Vc, recordhg in Vim reveals the presence of large amplitude (extracellularly
recorded action potentials) units with high spontaneous activity. The amplitude, site
and spontaneous activity however, are not as high as in Vc (Tasker and Kiss, 1995).
The cells respond to contralateral squeezing of muscle bellies or tendons, other deep
structures, or passive joint movements (kinesthetic movements). Vim somatotopy is
medial to lateral as in Vc but not as discrete. Stimulation in posterior Vim can induce - contralateral paraesthesia just like in Vc although the PFs are larger and the thresholds
higher. This is probably due to current spread (volume wnduction) into Vc. Thus, it is
difficult to detenine the VimNc border from PF data alone. Another major factor that is
used to identii Vim in patients with Parkinsonian or Essential tremor is the presence of
tremor cells. These cells have oscillations in firing rate at the same frequency as the
peripheral tremor and will be discussed in more detail latet. In a small number of sites,
stimulation (macro more often then micro) can produce a sensation of movement
(Tasker and Kiss, 1995).
. - - -
1.4.4 The Anterior and Posterior Ventral Oral Nucleus (Voa and Vop)
The anterior ventral oral nucleus (Voa) is more dificuit to recognize
neurophysiologically in humans. The extracellulariy recorded action potential
amplitudes of the units in Voa are usually smaller than in Vc or Vim and cells don't
necessarily respond to movements. Stimulation in Voa elicits no response other than
through volume conduction (cuvent spread) into the intemal capsule at very high
currents. Voa receives some of the pallidal input from the basal ganglia (reviewed by
Tasker and Kiss. 1995).
The posterior ventral oral nucleus (Vop) is easy to identify eledrophysiologically. It
receives pallidal and cerebellar inputs. The units in this sub-nucleus have smaller
amplitudes than in Vim or Vc and respond to contralateral voluntary movements. The
voluntary cells can fire in advance of the movement. The cells in Vop also have a
medial to lateral somatotopy. In general the cells respond to contralateral movement
but in some cases to ipsilateral movement as well. Tremor cdls can also been found in
Vop. They, like Vim tremor cells, can Cre at the same frequency as the peripheral r tremor. Because they can fire in advance of their retated voluntary movement, it has
been hypothes~ed that they may be the pacemakers for tremor and other voluntary
movements. Electrical stimulation does not usually evoke sensations of movements in
the neurons' receptive field. Lesions and chronic stimulation have been applied in this
area for the treatment of dyskinesias (reviewed by Tasker and Kiss, 1995).
1.4.5 The Anterior Thalamic Nuclei
Although the anterior thalamic nuclei (ATN) share many properties with other relay
and associative thalamic nuclei they have characteristics that give them a different
---2= - -
functional significance. First, rather than being linked with neo-cortical areas, ATN are
reciprocally connected with structures such as presubicular, retrosplenial, or cingulate
cortices (reviewed by Pare et al., 1987). Second, their major afferent input cornes from
the mammillary bodies and not from motor or sensory related structures of the brain
stem and spinal cord. Thirdly, the anterior thalamic nuclei seem to be a group devoid of
inputs from the reticular thalamus. Although the cells are capable of bursting if
hyperpolarized enough, they do not exhibit spindle oscillations where populations of
neurons burst in synchrony. This is because the reticular nucleus is the generator of
spindle rhythmicity (Pare et al., 1987). Recently, this region of the thalamus has
becorne clinically important for the treatment of epilepsy. More specifically, the ventralis
anterior nucleus has been a target for chronic stimulation to prevent the propagation of
seizures. Historically, lesions were also perfomed in this region to treat psychiatrie
diseases (Tasker and Kiss. 1995).
1 S.0 Parkinson's Disease (PD)
The basal ganglia consists of the striatum, globus pallidus(GP), sub-thalamic -
/
nucleus (STN), and the substantia nigra (SN). The striatum consists of the caudate
nucleus and putamen. They shara many oganizaüonal and connecüve simüarities. lt is
thought that the putamen is the motor area and the caudate is associated with more
cognitive tasks. The striatum has three primary inputs including, dopaminergic from SN
pars compacta (SNc), glutamatergic via corticostriatal projections, and a projection from
the intralaminar thalamic nuclei. The striatal output neurons project to two major areas;
the extemal segment of the globus pallidus (GPe)(the indirect pathway) and the intemal
segment of globus pallidus (Gpi)lSN pars reüculata (SNr) cornplex (the direct pathway).
--- -
Both of these outputs are GABAergic. Ilopamine projections from SNc have an
inhibitory effect on the striatal GPe projecting neurons and an excitatory effect on the
SNrIGPi projecting neurons. GPe then projeds to STN (via GABA) which projects to
SNr and GPi (via glutamate) (Alexander and Cnitcher, 1990).
More than 500,000 Americans suffer from PD, and about 50,000 new cases are
reported annually, according to the National Institutes of Health. The numben may be
larger than what is reported, because diagnosis - especially early on - can be diffÏcult.
The syrnptoms of PD indude slowing of movements (akinesia and bradykinesia), limb
rigidity, and trernor. It is the most common of the basal ganglia diseases (Crossman,
1999). The largest patient population for DBS are Parkinson's patients. PD is caused
by degeneration of the SNc region of the basal ganglia. This results in decreased
release of dopamine from SNc ont0 the striatum. The SNc targets are twofold including
D l and 02 dopamine recepton on striatal neurons, the net result of which is
disinhibition of the GPüSNr output. This is believed to result in excessive inhibition of
thalamic targets (VoaNop) resulting in the slowing down of movements. Most patients - ' can be effedively treated with drugs for a number of years. However, in many cases
-- the effectiveness of the drug diminishes and abnorrnal involuntary movements (refened
to as dyskinesias) start to develop. For these cases neurosurgical interventions in the
basal ganglia and thalamus have been bund effective in alleviating some of the
symptoms.
1 .SA Essential Tremor (ET)
Essential tremor (ET) is a prevalent movement disorder that affects between 0.3-
1.7% of the aged population (Rautakorpi et al. 1984). ET is characterized by an action
- tremor (4-1 2Hz) which is not present at rest. €MG recordings of the limb generating the
tremor show simultaneous bursts in antagonistic muscles. PD, on the other hand,
shows altemate bursts between agonist and antagonistic muscles (Marsden 1984).
Trernor cells are also found in the VopNim region of ET patients where lesions or DBS
can anest or significantly reduce trernor (Goldman et al., 1992; Hirai et al., 1983).
The pathophysiology and possible neuronal pathways involved in ET remain
poorly understood. It is thought that tremor associated with ET is the result of a central
oscillator. The location of the oscillator has not been confimed although the inferior
olivary wmplex is a possible candidate (Hallet and Dubinsky. 1993). The net result is
an increase in firing of the deep cerebellar neurons via disinhibition (the exact circuit is
reviewed in Buford et al., 1996). There is evidence of excitatory connections from deep
cerebellar nuclei to Vim in monkeys (Hirai and Jones. 1989). Thus, increased inferior
olive activity could result in increased excitation of Vim. This is in contrast to the effects
that PD pathophysiolgy has on Vim (inhibition via GPüSNr) although both diseases can
be troated with lesions or DBS in the sarne area.
'1.5.2 Tremor and DBS
The ventral lateral thalamic nuclei are populated with cells that fire in synchrony
with tremor. Recent studies in our lab indicate that the Vim is a site where tremor cells
are concentrated and where stimulation results in optimal tremor relief. The Vim
nucleus is currently the most widely chosen sugical target for treating tremor
associated with movement disorden such as ET. Vim thalamotomy is highly effective
with over 90% of patients having satisfactory results (Koller et al., 2000). However, side
effects such as motor, sensory, cerebellar, speech, and cognitive complications can
occur. These complications are worsened when the thalamotomies are bilateral.
Because of this, dinicians have sought alternative procedures that would minimize the
unwanted side effects. DBS is now the treatment of choice for tremors associated with
PD, ET, and demyelinating (i.e. multiple sclerosis) and traumatic central nervous system
lesions.
The close temporal relationship between tremor cells and peripheral tremor
suggests that these cells could act as tremorogenic pacemakers. The trauma
associated with electrode entry into a region of tremor cells can in some cases be
enough to stop the tremor for up to several days in the coniralateral side of the body.
Furthemore, microstimulation in these same areas can evoke transient tremor arrest.
However, the mechanism(s) by which this is accomplished is still not well understood
(Reviewed by Lozano. 1998).
1.5.3 Chronic Pain and DBS
De8p brain stimulation is the treatment of last resort for patients with intractable
chronic incapacitating pain that is unresponsive to conventional therapy. Thalamic DBS
has been used to treat many nociceptive and neuropathic pain states. Neuropathic pain
results frorn damage to the pain pathway of the newous system. This type of pain c m
be responsive to sensory thalamic (Vc) stimulation and the frequencies used are
typically lower than those used to treat tremor in Vim. Nociceptive pain (sharp or
aching), such as chronic lower back pain or cancer pain, is thought to be more
responsive to pedventricular grey matter (PVG) stimulation. Some patients experience
both types of pain. making the treatment protocol more difficult (Gildenberg and Tasker,
1998).
1.6.0 Current Ideas on Mechanisms of DBS
The therapeutic effect of DBS in motor thalamus is clinically well documented for
the treatment of trernor associated with PD and ET (Lozano, 1998). The mechanism(s)
undeilying its effects however are still not well understood. In general, the beneficial
effect of thalamic (Vim) DBS mimics a lesion of the same structure. Similarly, DBS and
lesions in the internat segment of globus pallidus and STN, for treating PD, have both
yielded very similar dinical benefits. The model for PD predicts that, as a result of SNc
dopamine depletion, the STN and GPi/SNr complex are hyperactive. This implies that
any therapy directed at GPüSNr or STN should reduce the hyperactivity (Obeso et al..
2000). This has lad to the belief that DBS was somehow inhibiting surounding gray
matter structures to mediate its therapeutic effects.
There are a number of theoretical possibilities that must be considered. First, it
has been suggested that high frequency stimulation could result in neuronal
depolarization block of sodium channels due to the maintenance of a depolarized state
in the neural tissue sunounding the stimulating electrodes. More specifically, this would - have the effect of preventing sodium channels from retuming to a de-inactivated state.
which is dependant on the membrane potential retuming to a hyperpolarized state. The
kinetics of the sodium channel activation and inactivation gates have been previously
reviewed (Silverthom, 1999). During depolarization the activation gate opens and
allows sodium ions to flow thmugh. After a short period of time. the sodium channel
inactivation gate blocks hirther ion entry. Membrane hyperpolarization is needed for the
two gates to reset to their original positions. If the activation gate doesn't reset. the
ability of the sodium channel to be opened via voltage activation is prevented, and
action potential generation is blocked. Second, the neural network wuld be disrupted
(also termed 'neuronal jamrningn) by the additional nerve impulses generated by the
stimulation. Finally, stimulation might produce a net inhibition in the network by the
activation of inhibitory neurons or by other mechanisms (Benazzouz and Hallet, 2000).
The cuvent ideas on the mechanism of thalamic DBS corne from obsewing the
clinical effects of lesions and obseiving the effects of dnig micro-injection and electrical
stimulation. Recent studies, involving the micro-injection of the local anasthetic
lidocaine (sodium channel blocker) into areas with tremor cells in Vim, have shown
tremor reduction. which further strengthens the inhibition hypothesis. In most cases,
lidocaine mimicked the effects of lesions and high frequency electrical stimulation
(Dostrovsky et al., 1993). A study involving microinjections of the GA8A agonist
muscimd into the Vim of ET patients also showed tremor arrest (Pahapill et al., 1999).
The effects of DBS in the Vim are well documented. Stimulation at high
frequency, typically greater than 1 OOHz. results in tremor attenuation or tremor arrest
while the stimulator is ON. After termination of stimulation. there may be rebound
*-worsening of th8 tremor. Interestingly, slow rates of stimulation may drive the tremor.
Recent, as yet unpublished results from our lab, indicate that 50% of neurons in sensory
mtor thalamus are excited when microstimulating at low frequency (3Hz-50Hz). close
to the cell body (c250um). This study used the same glued, dual microelectrode setup
that was used in this thesis (See Methods section for more details). Short duration and
latency excitation was seen after each stimulation pulse during the stimulus trains. Due
to the presence of the stimulus artifact, at higher frequency stimulus trains (i.e. 1OOHz).
it was difficult to observe the neural activity.
- -
~ledrical stimulation causes depolarkation that generates action potentials that
propagate from the site of stimulation along the axon. The initiation of the action
potential can begin in the axon or cell body (via depolarization that is transmitted to the
axon hillock). Thus, answering the question of what neuronal element is activated
during grey matter stimulation becomes essential. The identification of which elements
might be activated can be revealed through temporal properties detemiined from the
retationship between the duration, and the threshold intensity, of a current pulse
inducing a given response (strengthduration relationship or chronaxie) (Nowak, 1998).
The studies showing large myelinated axons being the most excitable neuronal element
in cortical grey mater were first reviewed in detail by Ranck (1 975). Since then,
strength-duration measurements in the visual cortex of rats revealed that axons and not
cell bodies are the elements activated first by low threshold electiical stimulation
(Nowak, 1998). Some reœnt chronaxie data from Vim has yielded results that support
the hypothesis that DBS preferentially activates large myelinated axons and not the cell
bodies (Holsheimer et al., 2000). This study compared the strength-duration time
.-instant (chronaxie) of large myelinated axons. small myelinated axons. cell bodies.
and dendrites. The data were wllected from PD and ET patients treated by DBS in Vim
or GPi. The threshokls for tremor arrest were used to obtain the chronaxies. The study
conduded that the primary targets of stimulation in both nuclei are most probably large
myelinated axons.
Studies similar to the topic of this thesis have been done on other nuclei of the
basal ganglia. A recent study. done in the rat STN suggests that high frequency
stimulation produces a transient inactivation of voltage-gated currents (Beurrier et al.,
2001). The study involved patch-clamp preparations of rat brain slices. The study
showed long inhibitory periods (typically 5-6 mins) following prolonged (1 min stimulus
trains) high frequency (1 66-500Hz) macrostimulation and microstimulation. The group
observed that high frequency stimulation blocked tonic and bursting STN neurons with a
mechanism that does not require calciumdependent transmitter release. They
concluded the silencing effed was not mediated by activation of local networks or by
stimulation of afferents to the STN. It was still observed in the presence of blockers of
glutamatergic and GABAergic ionotropic synaptic transmission, and in the presence of
cobalt, at a concentration that totally blocked synaptic transmission. This in vitro study
shows a potential mechanism for DBS in the rat STN. However, the patch clamp
technique destroys many of the afferent inputs, making generalizations to human DBS
difficult.
Stimulation through one electrode while recording from the other has yielded some
interesüng results in other basal ganglia structures suggesting synaptic release
mechanisms. Studies in GPi showed microstimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal
-firing in hurnan patients undergoing neunisurgeiy. This was shown in nearly al1 the
cells tested at currents typically under 10 UA at frequencies as low as 5HZ (Fig. 1.1 0).
These findings suggest that microstimulation in GPi excites the GABA terminais frorn
striatal and pallidal neurons, resulting in inhibition via GABA release (Dostrovsky et al..
2000). In the monkey, a group reporteci that stimulation in GPi at therapeutic intensities
resulted in decreased firing rate but not block of activity (Boraud et al., 1996). The
dorsal thalamus (including Voa, Vop, Vim and Vc) also has a high proportion of
GABAegic afferents. The teticular thalamus projects strongly to dorsal thalamus via
GABAergic fibers. Furthemore, interneurons project to thalamocortical cells via
GABAergic fibers. The thalamus works to tum itself off through its intnnsic circuitry with
the reticular nucleus. The triadic circuitry in the thalamus, however, seems to be more
complex than in other basal ganglia structures, involving excitatory cortical and sub-
cortical inputs inputs as well (Fig.l.7).
Together these data suggest that the mechanism of DBS may be much more
cornplicated than previously thought. Studies consistently show that the rnost excitable
neuronal elements are large myelinated axons. However, cunent density decreases
with distance frorn the stimulating etectrodes tip. Thus, the neuronal elements being
excited Vary with tip distance, further complicating any interpretations.
As of yet, the effect of high frequency micro-sümulation on thalamic neurons has
not been tested. The results of this would be important since thalamic DBS is such a
widely employed neumsurgical tool for the treatment of chronic pain and tremor
associated with movement disorders. This data may aid in elucidating possible
mechanisms of thalamic DBS, and DBS in general. This thesis discusses the effects of
microstimulation on thalamic neuron firing, and its possible role in therapeutic DBS. A
recenUy developed dual electmde apparatus is used to observe the effects of high
frequency microstimulation on nearby neurons in human patients. This apparatus
allowed for stimulation through one electrode white recording from the other and is the
first in vivo study of high frequency microstimulation effects in human or animal thalamic
neurons.
-- -
Fiaure 1.1 : The figure depicts various sub-nuclei of the dorsal thalamus typically
encountered during functional stereotactic neurosurgery procedures for treatment of
movement disorders and chronic pain. The abbreviations for the nuclei are as follows:
Vc = ventrocaudal nuclei, Vim = ventralis intemedius, Vop = ventrooralis posterior, Voa
= ventrooralis anterior. Table 1 describes the afferent and efferent connections of each
nucleus in more detail.
\
1
Figure 1.1
Nuclei of the Dorsal Thalamus -
a nterior
v Iateral inferiodventral
Figure adapted from Tasker and Kiss, 1995.
- Fiaure 1.2: The cell was held at three different initial holding membrane potentials as
indicated. Each of the thtee recording traces shows a response to a 0.3nA curent
pulse. Note that when the cell is held at -55mV (A) it responds to the depolarizing
cuvent pulse with a sustained firing of unitary action potentials. 6 indicates a
membrane potential at which the LTS channels are not de-inactivated and where the
cuvent pulse does not produce an action potential. When the cell is held at -70mV (C),
the LTS channels are in the deinactivated state and are activated by the depolarizing
cuvent pulse. The LTS is accompanied by a burst of action potentials.
.- .-
Figure 1.2 ---- A..?- - - -
Tonic and burst firing modes for a relay cell from the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus recorded intracellularly in an in vitro slice
-7OmV I 0.3 nA - . f
FQum adapted h m S. Shennan and R. Guillery's Explofi'g The ~ ~ I a m u s , 2207.
- Fieure 1.3: The figure depicts the voltage dependence of the LTS and the number of
adion potentials generated by the LTS in two cells (A and 0). Note that a
depolarization pulse from more hyperpolarized membrane potentials results in a larger
LTS with more action potentials.
Figure 1.3 Voltage Dependence of LTS 30
Figure fmm Zhen el al., 2000.
Initial Membrane Holding Potential (mV)
-= -
Fiaure 1.4: The figure illustrates various voltagedependent conductances that are
thought to contribute to cyclical burst firing in thalamic relay cells. Hyperpolarization
causes both IT de-inactivation and IH activation. In activation causes lT activation and a
subsequent burst of sodium dependent action potentials. This activates various
potassium conductances that then hyperpdarize the membrane and cause a repetition
of the cycle.
' c'
1 : l~ de-inactivateci . 4: Na+/K+ siikes activated ' - 2: lh adivated 5: various 1- activated
Figureadapted from McCormick.. 33: activated 6: lh de-activated and Pape, 1900. ' -.., 7: IT inactivated -
Fiaure 1.5: The figure illustrates the difference in lA and IT deactivation and activation.
Notice that both curves have a similar shape however the voltage dependence of IA is
shifted to the depolarized direction. On the left are shown the inactivation curves
(circfes). The points for this curve were obtained by holding the membrane at various
holding potentials (plotted on abscissa) for i second and then stepping up to 42mV.
Note that the more hyperpdarized the starüng level the greater the cuvent evoked
although both currents move in opposite directions. The activation curves (squares)
shown on the right were obtained by initially holding at -1 02mV, which would completely
deinactivate the channels and stepping up to various membrane voltages plotted on
the abscissa. The greater the voltage step, the greater the evoked conductance. This
is thought to occur because larger depolarizations activate more Ir and IA channels.
Whether a postsynaptic potential activates one or both currents depends on the initial
membrane voltage and the temporal properties of the voltage channels. Notice from the
figure that there is a limited membrane potential near -70mV where lT is inactivated but
Ir is still slightly de-inactivated. During this period the cell may not fire at all. (A) Curve
"for a relay cell. (B) Curve for an intemeuron where there is more overlap between the
inactivation curves.
- - -
Fi-aure 1.6: The figure depicts the basic connections between the thalamus. reticular
nucleus, and cortex. The connections depicted are of first order thafamic nudei
depicted in a coronal section. The nuclei labeled A and B are connected with
corresponding A and B reticular sectors and conespondhg cortical regions. Note that
wrticothalarnic neurons can synapse ont0 thalamocortical neurons directly or indirectly
via RE neurons and interneurons.
Figure Connections between Thalamus and Cortex
TRN = Thalamic Reticular Nucleus
Figure adaited from Sherman and GuilIIe~y~ 2001.
- - -
Flauie 1.7: The drawing indicates the synaptic relationship typical of the majority of
thalamic nuclei. It is generally believed similar inputs are found in al1 dorsal thalamic
relay cell dendrites, although the majority of the studies have been conducted in the
lateral geniculate nucleus (LON). Notice that the subartical driving input (Tl) activates
the relay cell (R) dendrite (D) directly and via the GABAergic interneuron's (1) pre-
synaptic dendntic appendages (T2). Axons of the interneurons also teminate (F) on the
presynaptic dendrites. The sub-cortical modulatory inputs via the brain stem also make
similar dendritic contacts although they are not depicted in the figure (Sherman and
Guillery. 2001). The triadic circuit is ernbedded in a glomerulus, composed of astrocytic
processes, (G) into which a dendritic appendage (O) fmm a relay cell intnides. Outside
this, cortico-thalamic teminals (C) end on relay cell dendrites and on pre-synaptic
teminals of interneurons. H o w ~ v ~ ~ , the majority of cortico-thalarnic teminals are more
distally situated. Rt, indicates the reticular thalamic cell input (GABAergic) which also
occurs proximally on the cell body. The recticular thalamic input is a major source of
inhibition to thalamic relay cells. It should be noted that inhibitory synapses from pre- - ' synaptic intemeuron dendrites ont0 relay cells, outnumber excitatory, sub-cortical
synapses by a factor of 4 (Jones, 1985).
a- - *
Fiaure 1.8: The figure illustrates the various afferent inputs converging ont0 a relay ceIl
in the lateral geniculate nucleus. The same arrangement is thought to exist in al1 dorsal
thalamic nuclei.
to . from
Thalarnic Relay CeCl Afferent Inputs
ACh acetylcholine .
Glu glutamate Int. interneuron NO nitric oxide NA noradrenaline PBR parabrachial region TRN thalamic reticular nucleus
Figwe adapted h m Sherman end Guilleiy, Exploring me Thalamus.
1.9: The figure depicts the afferent inputs ont0 a typical thalamic intemeuron (A)
and a reticular cell (B). The conventions are the same as in Figure 1 .a. The
intemeuron has two functionally distinct innervation zones. One incfudes the cell body
and proximal dendrites when the firing of the axon is controlled (via Fi teminals;
proximal and cell body afferents). The other are the more distal F2 terminal regions
where pre-synaptic contact to relay cells are made. There are a lot of questions as to
what type of innervation the reticular cells receive. Thus, besides the established areas
of cortical, brainstem (mainly parabrachial) and w-lateral input via thalamic relay cells,
not much is known. The abbreviations are as in figure 1.8 plus: BF, basal forebrain;
NOfl nucleus of the optic tract.
Figure 1.9
Thalamic lnterneuron and Reticular Cell Afferent Inputs
Questlon marks indicate afferent connections that are not well established.
Figure adapted from Sherman and GuiIIery, 200 1.
-A&- c
Fiaura 1.1 0: The figure depicts results from recent experiments involving dual electrode
recordings and stimulations from the intemal segment of globus pallidus (GPi). Note
how micro-stimulation produces inhibition following each stimulus pulse (A). Part B
depicts a 1OOmsec interval of the same cell during a 300Hz stimulus train. Note that the
cell did fire occasionally during this period but not during the first 1.3 seconds of
stimulation. Thus, increased stimulus frequency caused more pronounced inhibition.
This suggests that microstimulation may activate the GABAergic aflerents from the
striaturn and GPe resulüng in the release of GABA onto GPi cells. Since the motor
thalamus also receives a substantial amount of GABAergic afferents from the thalarnic
reticular neurons, intemeurons. and Gpi, DBS effects here may also be mediated
through the release of GABA.
(Table 1: Summary of thalamic subm Hassler Nomenclature Types of celis Mrents L ~ o (iateropoiaris) medium sire 7
iclei being studied
-6
area 4.6 and possiMy 3a
Table adapted fmm Taker and Kiss, 1995.
. . - *
Chapter 2
Methods
2.1 Patient Population
Studies were perfonned on 13 patients undergoing functional stereotactic
neurosurgery. In nine of the patients the target was within the thalamus. In the
remaining four patients the STN was the target. In these cases soma of the electrode
tracks passed through the thalamus. Most of the patients were operated on for
alleviating chronic pain or movement disorciers. Table 2.1 shows patient groupings and
surgical target areas. The functional stereotaxic neurosurgeries were perfomed either
to make a lesion or implant a DBS eledrode. Depending on the surgical target various
groupings of cells were encountered. In the STN cases, thalamic cells were generally
cdlected from more medial (1 0.5-1 2mm h m the midline) and anterior (Thalamic
reticular nucleus, Voa, Vop) portions of the thalamus relative to the Vim and Vc cases
(generally 14.5-1 5mm from midline). Figure 2.1 shows the various thalamic subnuclei in
a sagittal section 14.5mm from the midline. The procedure for chronic nociceptive pain r
treatment targeted the periventricular grey matter (PVG). Electrode tracks dunng this
procedure recorded from th8 medialis dorsalis (MD) regkn which is medial to Virn and
Vc (-5mm from the midline) (See Introduction figure 1 A). The procedure for epilepsy
treatment targeted the anterior nucleus (AN) which is located medial (-6mm from
midline) and anterior to Vc and Virn (See Introduction figure 1.1). Cells in this area are
distinct h m the rest of the thalamic nuclei studied. because they do not receive input
frorn the thalamic reticular nucleus (see Introduction section 1.4.5). Some of the data (7
patients) analyzed for this study were obtaind previously. The procedures were
perfomed in accordance with the Human Experimentation Cornmittee of the University
of Toronto and the Toronto Western Hospital, and patients gave free and informed
consent. The chief neutosurgeon (Dr. Andres Lozano) and the neurosurgery residents
and fellows were responsible for conducting the MRI scans, setting up the stereotactic
frame, inserting the guide tube. and implanting the DBS electrode. Dr. Jonathan
Dostrovsky, Dr. Karen Davis, and Dr. Bill Hutchison were responsible for the
rnicroelectrode recordings and stimulations.
The PD patients generally stopped their regular medication for at least 12 hours
pnor to surgery. This caused the symptoms to be more pronounced which allowed for
more precise localization of effective surgical targets. All patients rernained awake
during the procedure. This was important because their participation was required in
determining receptive fields (RFs) and projected fields (PFs). two components essential
in mapping out the various regions of the brain. Furthemore, sleep can change the
intrinsic physiological properties of brain regions. particularly in the thalamus where
sleep can cause cells to switch into a bumt-finng mode and cause tremor arrest. - ' 2.2 Stereotaxlc Technique
The methods used for stereotadic neurowrgeiy have been previously ieuiewed
(Lenz et al., 1988; Gildenberg and Tasker, 1998; Hutchison et al.. 1998). The
stereotaxic technique allows for the precise location of intemal landmarks in ternis of X,
Y. and Z coordinates to be detemined. An MRl-compatible. arc-centered Leksell
stereotactic frame (see figure 2.2) was fitted on the patient's head. The coordinates for
the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC) were detennined relative
to the stereotaxic frame using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. A cornputer
program was used to produce sagittal brain sections based on standard sagittal
sections from the Schaltenbrand and Wahren Atlas (Schaltenbrand and Wahren, 1977).
These were stretched or shnink to fit with the patient's ACIPC distance. In the
operating Riom, the patient was placed in a semi-sitting position. The frontal scalp was
washed, shaved, and painted with betadine solution. Under local anesthesia, a 3 cm
linear parasagittal incision was made 2cm from the midline (Lozano, 1998). A burr hole
that was in approximately the same parasagittal plane as the microelectrode trajectory
and target was then made (also under local anesthesia) by the neurosurgeon. A thin
walled guide tube was then positioned 10-1 5mm above the target. The guide tube was
necessary to protect the fine microelectrode tip before introduction into the brain tissue
and ensure minimal deviatkn of the electrode (Lenz et al., 1988). The microelectrodes
were then advanced through the brain tissue using a hydraulic microdrive.
2.3 Microelectrode Stimulation and Recordings
Physiological corroboration of the selected anatomical target was performed using
single-unit recording and stimulation using high-impedance microelectrodes. Details of r
the microelectrode setup and assembly have been previously descnbed (Lenz et al.,
$988; Hutchison et al., 1998; Oodmvsky et al., 2000) and will only briefly be addressd.
Single andlor multi units were recorded using Paryîene-coated tungsten
microelectmdes with an exposed tip length of 15dOpm. The electrode tips were plated
with gold and platinum to d u c e the irnpedance to a few hundred WI. The electrodes
were then givsn a bubble test, where the eledrode was immerseâ in saline solution
while a low OC voltage (3-5 V) was given. If the electrode is properly insulated this will
result in bubble formation only at the tip. The signals were filtered and amplified using
- the Guideline System GS3000 (Axon lnstruments, Foster city, CA). The two channels
of neuronal data were recorded on analog videotape (VR-100 digital recorder,
Instnitech Corp., Port Washington, NY). Singleunit recordings were necessary in order
to determine receptive field data that was vital in localizing the deep brain stnictures.
Two different rnicroelectrode configurations were used in the study. In some
cases Iwo microelectrodes were fixed together with glue (tips approximately 250uM
apart) and driven as one unit. Either electrode could be used to stimulate or record
from. This arrangement allowed for recording from one microelectrode while stimulating
from the other (stimulation was, biphasic. monopolar, with a .15msec pulse width). In
th8 other configuration. two independently controlled rnicroelectrodes were attached to
separate microdrives. This setup allowed movement of one electrode with respect to
the other. In this setup the rnicroeledrodes were further apart (about 650um-1 mm).
Using the above setups, the effects of microstimulation on neuronal activity could be
examined in 3 ways:
' A. Stimulation could be carried out diredly from the recording electrode and the
effects on neuronal activity following the stimulus train could be recorded. The
amplifier could not record for the 150-200msec period following the stimulus
train. In this case the electrode tip was in close proximity to the cell.
B. In the fixed configuration, stimulation thmugh one electrode was perfomed while
simultaneously recording h m a nearby (-250um away) electrode.
--- -- -
C. Finally, using the independent configuration. stimulation effects h m further
away (~650urn) could be observeâ.
The rnicroelectrode signal was monitored by listening to an audio monitor and by
observing the associated spike train displayed on the touch sensitive monitor on the GS
3000. The screen displays firing rate and a spike triggered waveform from which single
unit action potentials could be visualizeâ. The signal was also fed into an audio channel
(recorded on videocassette) that was later used to digitize the recording using the
computer program Spi ke 2 (Lenz et al.. 1 988).
Along the course of each electrode track the cells encountered were tested for
sensory responses. Electrical stimuli (1 sec, 300Hz) were delivered to determine
affects on tremor and whether sensations could be elicited. For thalamic surgeries the
initial target was usually the somatosensory portion of the dorsal thalamus (Vc). Cells in
Vc were identified by tactile receptive fields, Le. responding to light touching.
Furthemore, the Vc region was identified by the presence of high amplitude recordings
r of extracellular action potentials. and cells in this region tended to have a higher
spontaneous activity than in the adjacent Voa, Vop. and Vim nuclei. The Vim region,
which is anterior to Vc, was localized by the presence of cells with responsiveness to
passive joint movements. In tremor patients, Vim also contained tremor cells that Zred
in synchrony with the peripheral tremr. The Vop (anterior to Vim) and Voa (anterior to
Vop) regions were identified by the presence of cells that responded to voluntary
movements. Trernor cells could also be found in the Vop region (Fig. 2.3) (see
Introduction section 1.4, for review of the properties of thalamic sub-nuclei). The
&cePtive field (RF) and projected field (PF) data were usad to make reconstructions of
the electrode tracks (Fig. 2.3). The electrode track reconstnictions were compared to a
cornputer generated map of the stereotaxically detemiined anatomy (corresponding to
the location of the electrode) and were used for final localization of the cells. Thus, the
PF and RF data along with the Schaltenbrand and Wahren Atlas reconstructions were
used to identify the various thalamic nuclei.
2.4 Cell Populations and Offline Analysis
The recordings from both electrodes were stored on magnetic tape. Off-line
analyses of the digitized recordings were perfonned with a CEDI401 Spike 2 data
acquisition system. For most of the patients. individual units were discriminated using
waveform template rnatching (Spike 2 For Windows, 1998). The size and shape of the
action potential were used as criteria for the discrimination. In the remaining patients,
units were discriminated with a window discriminator.
2.4.1 Bursting Cell Analysis
- Bursting cells were detenined either visually or based on a wmputer script that
identified and quantified bursts based on their interspike intenrals. This automated
analysis identified a burst according to the following critena:
4. The maximum initial interval to identify the stait of a burst was 6msec.
2. The maximal interspike interval for a given burst was 1 Smsec. lnterspike intervals
larger than 15 msec are generally not associated with bursts.
3. The minimum burst duration was 2 mec.
4. The minimum number of spkes per burst was 2.
--
The script then computed and
activity of each cell. This was used
displayed descriptive statistics for the bursting
for graphical characterization of LTS bursts. Low
threshold calcium spike bursts were charaderized by graphing components of their
interspike intervals (see figure 2.4), or visually, by recognizing the characteristic LTS
pattern (see figure 2.5). The size of each inter-spike interval (ISI) gets larger with each
su bsequent ISI within a given burst. For example, if there was a burst with 4 spikes, the
ISI between the first two spikes would be smaller than the ISI between the second and
third spikes (decreasing ISI length as the ordinal number increases). This is shown by
plotting the ISI vs ordinal number as shown in figure 2.4. A second criterion that was
used involved comparing the Rrst ISI between various bursts. As the number of ISIS in
a burst increases (Le. larger bursts), the first ISI gets smaller. Thus, larger bursts have
smaller first lSl intervals. This is depicted in the regression plots in figure 2.4. Both of
these observations are consistent with LTS generated bursts (Lu, SM. et al., 1992;
Tsoukatos, J. et al.. 1997; Radharkrishnan et al.. 1999; Ramcharan, E.J. et al., 2000).
This burst analysis was carried out for both pre stimulus (Fig 2.4A) and post stimulus
T(Fig. 2.4 8) bunts. The majority of the LTS bursting cells were identified visually after
observing consistency betwan graphical and visual interpretations. Figure 2.5 shows
the pattern of a LTS burst. Almost al1 of the bursting cells rewrded showed a LTS
bursting pattern. Only one bursting cell was identified as a non-LTS bursting cell.
Long duration inhibition was arbitrarily defined as inhibition lasting at least 1
second. This period was defined by the absence of action potentials. In cells with
bursts before the start of inhibition, the inhibitory period was defined as starüng from the
end of the last acüon potential. In cells with irregular firing patterns, post stimulus
--- -- -
inhibitory periods were difficult to separate from random periods of silence. In these
œlls. periods of spontaneous pauses in firing were in the same order of magnitude as
the inhibitory periods, making it difficult to define inhibitory periods. Thus, cells that did
not have regular Rring patterns were not included in the results. In cells that were
included, the short spontaneous silent periods were very srnall compared to the periods
of inhibition typically observed in this study (see figure 3.2).
-Y A = -
&ure 2.1 : The anterior and posterior commissure points were determined through a
high resolution MRI scan. The figure depicts a map of the human thalamus in the
parasagittal plane 14.5mm lateral to the rnidline. Vol = area with cells that respond to
voluntary movements. Ki = area with cells that respond to kinesthetic movements.
Figure 2.1 - - L A -
Sagittal Section of Thalamus
- . L A -
Fraure 2.2: The figure illustrates the siereotactic frame assernbly. The microeledrode
carrier is attached after the frame is fitted on the skull. The arc centered frame pemiits
any target site to be reached from the same hole in the skull by changing the angles
and X, Y. and Z coordinates of the arc.
-- L-
Figure 2.3: The figure depicts receptive field (RF) and projected field (PF) data from
cells encountered through a single electrode trajectory during stereotactic surgery for
chronic pain. Cells that respond to kinesthetic inputs are generally thought to exist in
Vim. The Vop region has cells that respond to voluntary movements. The ventral
caudal region (Vc) is the tactile relay. Electrode reconstructions such as this were used
to help detennine the location of the cells.
Figure 2.3 Electrode T m k Reconstruction s21 14-" 1
wam, wh bwofse
ce4 leg buttocüs wann 20 40
AQAnlrikr Comnrbun -Connilrui. mC=rnCaimirunlPdn(
lndkaws lOCllf/on wh.n œll w.r raIuktid
-- Fiaure 2.4: The figure depicts the graphical characterization of LTS bursts. The size of
eabh inter-spike interval (ISI) gets larger with each subsequent ISI within a given burst
(increasing ISI as the ordinal number increases). This is shown in the ISI vs Ordinal
number plots. Furthemore, as the number of ISIS between bursts increases, the first
ISI gets smaller. This is depicted in the regression plots. Both of these observations
are consistent with LTS generated bursts. This was camed out for both pre stimulus (A)
and post stimulus (B) bursts.
Figure 2.4
Graphical Characterization of LTS Bursts. Length of ISI vs Ordinal Number
Length of Fint ISI vs Number of ISlss in the Burst
- - -
~ i ~ u r e 2.5: The figure depicts the pattern of an LTS generated burst from an in vivo
recording. It is quite easy to Mentify an LTS burst visually because of this characteristic
pattern.
Figure 2.5 --- -2- --= -
Extracellular methods used for visual and graphical characteriration of a low- threshold calcium burst
The duration of the first ISI decreases as a function- of total ISl's in a given burst
Furthermore, B the duration of a particular ISI within a burst increases as function of m n w a m w
a 2 C U ; N ~ J I m )
ordinal number r A mtniza(icr) 4an4Q(11u~ + s r n m c a ,
L
Table 2.1: Patient and Target Information I
Patient #
359 375 402 404 363 2242
Condition
Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Parkinsons Parkinson's
2243 Parkinson's Bil DBS, STN 3
DBSILesion, Target
DBS, Vc DBS, PVG DBS, Vc DBS, Vc DBS, Vim
Bil DBS, STN
2249 2250 364
1
373 367 374
Total Cells Tested
4 5 5 5 5 3
Parkinson's Parkinson's
Epilepsy Cerebellar Tremor Essential Tremor Essential Tremor
Bil DBS, STN Bil DBS, STN
Anterior Group DBS, Vim DBS, Vim
Lesion, Vim Totals
6 10 3 1 23 1
74
~hapter 3
Results
The effects of high frequency (100-333Hz) electrical stimulation, delivered from a
recording electrode or a nearby electrode, were examined in 74 neurons. Of these, 19
were from chronic pain patients, 27 from Parkinson's patients. 24 from Essential Tremor
patients, three from an epilepsy patient and 1 from a cerebellar tremor patient. Table 1
lists the number of cells tested in each patient. Cells were recorded from various
thalamic subnuclei including: Vc, Vim. Voa and Vop. Table 3.2 shows how many cells
were tested in each nucleus in each of the 3 major patient groups.
High frequency stimulation (100-333Hz) frequently resulted in long duration
inhibition (>l sec) that was usually preceded by a short period of bursting. An exemple
illustrating this effect is shown in Fig. 3.1. A total of 38 out of 74 cells showed this long
duration inhibition following the high frequency stimulation. Tables 3.1 and 3.2 list the
incidence of inhibition according to patient type and nucleus. In almost al1 the cells that
showed this effect the inhibitory par id was at least Mo seconds in duration. In some -
cases the inhibition lasted as long as 25 seconds. Only two of the 74 cells showed
inhibition of less than one second (see Fig. 3.2).
There were 3 different conditions under which the stimulations took place. First,
stimulations were carried out directly from the recording electrode in which case the cell
was in very close proximity to the stimulating electroâe (e.g. Figs. 3.1, 3.3). When this
type of experiment was carried out, stimulation cunents above 10 UA were rarely used.
At this pmximrty higher current intensities can kill the neuron being tested. This type of
stimulation was examined on a total of 44 cells and resulted in long duration inhibition in
- -
21 (48%) of the cells. The effects of stimulation deliverd from a nearby elecîroûe
(-250um) that was glued to the recording electrode were examined in 28 cells. This
type of stimulation resulted in long duration inhibition in 18 (64%) cases. Under these
conditions, stimulation currents of up to 1OOuA were tested. An example from one of
these cases is shown in Fig. 3.4. Finally. stimulations were perfomed using two
independently controlled microelectrodes (>650um) at cunents up to IOOuA. None of
the 8 cells that were tested in this way showed long duration inhibition or any other
effect.
The long duration inhibition was usually preceded by a short period of bursting
(pre-inhibition bursting) activity. Pre-inhibition bursting was seen in 33 of 38 (87%)
neurons that showed long duration inhibition. In cells that were bursting before the
stimulus was applied. the post stimulus bursts were generally larger than the bursts
prior to the stimulation. Larger post stimulus bursts were seen in 16 of 18 (89%)
bursting neurons that showed long duration inhibition. An example of pre-inhibition
bursting is shown in figure 3.5. Even though the pre-inhibition bursting period was not
'Ôbserved in a small number of cells. their occurrence could not be ruled out in these
cases because they occurred only with stimulation through the recording electrode. In
these cases the amplifier remained tumed off for a period of about 200 ms following the
end of the train. Thus, if bursting had occurred within 200 ms of the tenination of the
train, it would not have been detected.
Long duration inhibition was obsewed in most neurons that had a bursting firing
pattern (29 of 36 bursting cells tested, 81 %) but much less ftequently in cells that were
not bursting (24%). Table 3.3 shows the breakdown of effects according to nucleus and
==- --
whether the cells were bursting or no€. AJmosf amofthe burstihg celfs exhibiteci LTS
bursts.
The effeds of current intensity, train length. and frequency of stimulation on the
length of the inhibitoiy period were systematically tested in 15 cells. The effect of
varying cunent intensity was tested on a total of 6 cells. In al1 6 of these cells there was
increased duration of inhibition with increased stimulus current. Figure 3.6 shows an
example of the effects of increasing the intensity of the stimulus current. In two of the
cells, the number of pre-inhibition bursts decreased with increasing current. However,
the number of spikes per burst increased with increasing stimulus current. This is
illustrated in figure 3.7. The other cells didn't show any difference.
Six cells were tested for the effects of varying train length in the range 0.1 sec to
4sec. Al 6 cells showed longer duration inhibition with increased train length.
However, in some cases (4 of the cells) the amount of pre-inhibition bursting decreased
as a function of train length although the duration of inhbition increased. An example
showing the effects of increasing train duration is shown in Figure 3.8.
Three cells were tested for the effed of stimulus fiequency on inhibition. In al1 3
cases increasing the frequency in the range from 10 to 333Hz resulted in increased
duration of inhibition. Figure 3.9 shows an example of the effect of increasing train
frequency on the inhibition. In one of the cells, increasing frequency caused a decrease
in the number of bursts. This is illustrateâ in figure 3.9. The other cells did not show
any difference.
---- - Fliaure 33: The effect of high frequency sttmulatton detivered from the same etedrade
that was recording the cell. The duration of this type of inhibition was typically longer
than 2 seconds.
Figure 3.1 'l
Effect of high frequency stimulation from recording electrode on a bursting cell in the thalamus.
I
1 2 seconds 1 sec, 1 OOHz, 5uA. 0.1 Smsec pulse width Stimulus train bursting d l , MD, 37 SOI
- &-..A FiauFe 3.2: HQfi fiequency sfimutation producecf short duratton inhibition (clsec) in onfy
2 out of 74 cells tested. An example of this type of inhibition is depicted in the figure.
Figure 3.2
333 HZ, 0.1 5msec pulse width, ~ U A , 1 sec Stimulation Causing Inhibition
400 msec inhibitory period
1 second
ceIl35906 VoaNop
- - hure 3.3: Example of effects of stimulation on cell Rtng when stimulating directly from
the recording electrode at close proximity.
Cells 224201 a and 224201 b (smaller) are depicted before, and following several 200 Hz
5uA stimulation trains. 60th of the cells are LTS bursting cells. The bursts are depicted
at a smaller time interval in figure 3.5. Following stimulation there is an increase in the
sire of each burst after which there is a long inhibitory period of up to 8 sec. Note that
the srnaller unit takes tess time to recover.
Effects of several 500msec, 200Hz,5uA, 0.1 Smsec pulse width stimulus trains on two bursting cells.
smaller cell l
~ a r ~ e r cell
5 seconds - VoaNop ceIl224201
A - -
mure 3.k The figure depicfs the eRéc€of high fiequency stimulation fiom a nearby
stimulating electrode on a thalamic bursting cell. Notice the long duration inhibition of
the smaller unit following the stimulus train. The stimulating electrode was
approximately 250um away from the recording electrode.
Figure 3.4
Effects of stimulation from a nearby stimulating electrode
100Hz, IOuA, 0.15 msec pulse width
- 2 seconds
\ / DT, Celi 36734
-= -- - FiKm 3 S me iiiusfration shows aie efect ofstiimuhtion on bursting. The majority of
cells (33 of 38; 87%) that showed long duration inhibition showed bursting activity
preceding the onset of the inhibitory period. For cells that were bursting before the
stimulus train, the post stimulus bursts were larger than pre stimulus bursts. This was
observed in 16 of 18 (89%) cells. In this example the average burst size before
stimulation was 2.25 spikes per burst. Following stimulation, the average burst size was
4 spikes per burst.
--.. .
Figure 3.5 - ---.------.. - -
The Effects of Stimulation on Burst Size
Pre-Stimulus Burst Post-Stimulus Burst The average size of The average size of bursts for this cell was bursts following a 100Hz 2.25 spikes per burst 5uA stimulation was
4 spikes per burst Bursting CeII VoaNop (0.15 msec pulse width)
-- Fiqure 3.8: The figure depicts the effect of incteasing current on the inhibitory period of
a bursting cell. The stimulation trains were given at 50Hz and were 1 second in
duration. A similar effect was observed in 6 cells.
'/ Figure 3.6
The Effect of Current lntensity on Length of lnhibitory Period Following a 500msec 50 Hz Stimulus (0.15msec pulse width) Train
2 sec
Cell224201, V W o p
mz -- Figure 3.7: This figure shows the effect of currenf on bursf sue (events per burst) and
the total number of bursts in two neurons in Vim following IOOHz stimulus trains.
lncreasing current caused larger bursts but a lower number of total bursts. Note how
the effect is not as pronounced in the smaller unit.
Figure 3.7 -A---- 2
The Effect of Current On Pre Inhibition Bursting
1 OOHz, O. 1 Smsec pulse width, 500msec stimulus trains
4 seconds Bursting cell, Vim
Average eventslburst 3.9 5.5
Average eventdburst 3.5 3.8
Larger Cell Average for 10 UA Average for 20uA Smaller Ce11
L
Average for 10 UA Averaae for 20uA
# of Bursts 5.5 3
# of Bursts 4.5 4
- A
Fiaure 3.8: The effect of train length on the inhibitory period is depicted for a bursting
cell. Stimulation with longer train lengths resulted in longer inhibitory periods in 6 cells
that were tested. In 4 of these cells, increasing train length duration caused a decrease
in pre inhibition bursting activity.
Figure 3.8
The effect of train length on inhibitory period following 200Hz,3uA stimulations (0.1 5msec pulse width)
500 msec train I 2 seconds 1000 msec train
n -- Fiaure 3.9: The figure illustrates the effects of increasing frequency on the inhibitory
period of two bursting cells (also depicted in figure 3.5). This response was seen in 3
cells that were tested. Note the effect of stimulus frequency on pre inhibition burst
activity of the larger cell. lncreasing the frequency of stimulation resulted in a smaller
number of bursts.
Figure 3.9 ---LA a---- 2 -
An example of the effects of increasing frequency on the inhibitory period of two bursting cells
second stimulus train 5uA stimulation period 0.1 Smsec pulse width
- 2 Seconds Bursüng Cell VoaNop
'F requency of Stimulation (Hz) 10
I
20 50 100
Average # of Bursts IAverage eventshurst 5.5 5
2.5 4
2 2
4 3
Table 3.' Summar Patient # --F
I Note that loi
t . . I
r of Data For High Frequency Stimulation rn
Cerebellar Tremor Essential Tremor Essential Tremor Totals
Percent % 75 80 20 O 80 67 O 50 40 I
O
Condition
Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Chronic Pain Parkinsons Parkinson's Parkinson's Parkinson's Parkinson's Epilepsy
1 _
23
g tem inhibNion was erbitraniy defined as inhibition a t e r than 1 sec
1 74
Total Cells Tested
4 5 5 5 5 3 3 6 10 3
O 17
Cells Showing lnhi bition
3 4 1 O 4 2 O 3 4 O
O 74
O 38
O 51
-- - -
I~able 3.2 Patient and Subnuclei Cell Grouping
ûther nudei included dorsal areas, above Vc, Virn, and VopNoa, along with a few cells frorn the anterior, medial, and reticular thalamus
Patient Group
PD ,Pain Other
Other patients included ET, EQilepsy and Cerebellar trernor.
Total
27 19 28
# inhibited
13 8 17
VG Total
O , 1 9
# inhibited O O 3
Vim Total
O 7 4
# inhibited O 3 2
VopNoa Total
24 6 1
Other I
# inhibited 13 1 1
Total 3 5 14
# inhibited O 4 11
Table 3.3: Effect of Stimulation on Butsting and Non-BurstingCells Location of c e b vc Vim Vop/Voa OLher Total
Bursting Cells Total #
1 4 16 15 36
NonBursting Cells Total #
9 7 15 7 38
# Inhibied
O 4 13 12 29
% lnhibited
O 100 81 80 81
# Inhibited
3 1 2 3 9
% Inhibition
33 14 13 43 24
Discussion
This study has shown that high frequency stimulation (HFS) results in long
duration inhibition of thalamic neurons (51 %) following the stimulus train (Table 3.1).
Typically, the inhibitory periods were longer than 2 seconds and in many cases above 5
seconds. These effeds were predominantly seen following high frequency (>100Hz)
stimulation at close proximity (less than or equal to 250 pm) to the cell. Furthemiore,
the long duration inhibition was seen primarily in bursting cells (81 % in bursting cells
wmpared to 24% in non-bursting cells). These findings are summarized in tables 3.2,
3.3, and 3.4. The length of long duration inhibition was found to be dependent on
current intensity, train length, and frequency of stimulation. This is the first study of its
kind done in animal or human thalamus.
4.1 Results From Similar Studies (GPi, SNr, and STN)
Recently, similar studies to the topic of this thesis have been done in our /--
laboratory in other deep brain structures of the basal ganglia. In these studies, high and
low frequency stimulation was carried out in GPi. STN, and SNr and the effects were
different than those described in this thesis for thalamus. Two main types of
observations were made. First. the effeds of single pulse stimuli during low frequency
trains on neuronal firing patterns were observed. Second, effects of high frequency
stimulus trains on neuron finng were observeci following the termination of the stimulus
train. Low frequency shidies in GPi showed inhibition of neumn firing following each
stimulus pulse. The inhibitory effects were seen using the fixed (-250pm apatt) and
independent (-650pm apart) microelectruâe assemblies. The duration of inhibition
obsenred in GPi experiments was ver- short (typically <50msec, Fig 1 .IO). That study
suggested that the inhibition was mediated by GABA release from incoming afferents of
striatal andior extemal pallidal (GPe) origin (Dostrovsky et al., 2000). The effects of low
frequency stimulation in SNr were similar to those in GPi. High frequency
microstimulation in GPi and SNr typically caused short duration inhibition (Le. a few
hundred msec) following termination of the stimulus train. This is much shorter than
that obsewed in thalamic cells. The effects of microstimulation in GPi and SNr are
consistent with the theoretical mode1 for the pathophysiology of PD.
Theoretically, inhibition of STN would cause less excitation of the SNrlOPi
cornplex and improve parkinsonian symptoms. The therapeutic effects observed from
STN DBS are consistent with this. However, low frequency microstimulation in STN did
not consistently produce any effects. This may be due to differences in the ratio of
excitatory to inhibitory terminais compared with GPi and SNr. High frequency
stimulation (50-200Hz) in the STN resulted in inhibition (58% of cells tested) following r the stimulus train. This inhibition ranged from 50 to over Sûûmsec, which was
considerably shorter than the inhibitory periods observed in this thesis for thalamic
stimulation. For some of the STN cells the pattern of inhibition consists of inhibition
followed by rebound excitation and subsequently followed by more inhibition. This is
consistent with animal studies and suggests that inhibition in STN is mediated by
hyperpolarization. Since sodium action potentials are observed during the inhibitory
periods, the inhibitory periods are most likely not a result of depolarization block.
Together, these findings show that high frequency microstimulation in GPi. SNr. and
STN results in inhibition of cell finng. However, the type of inhibition observed in these
structures is cleariy diffwent from the effects observed following high frequency
stimulation in the thalamus.
4.2 Low Frequency Stimulation Effects in the Thalamus
Interestingly, recent evidence from our lab indicates that low frequency stimulation
produces short latency and short duration excitation (~50msec) of some (-50%)
thalamic cells following each stimulus pulse. Furthemore, in a number of these cells
there is a short period of inhibition (typically c100msec) directly following the initial
excitation. The excitation could be the result of glutamate release following excitation of
glutamatergic afferents. However, the stimulation should also have activated
GABAergic afferents. Presumably. at low frequency, the net excitatory effect was larger
than the inhibitory.
4.3.1 Pre Inhibition Bursting
The predominant effect following high frequency stimulation was long duration
inhibition that was pteceded by a short period of bursting activity. A number of points r
regading the pattern of bursting prior to long duration inhibition should be considered.
Them was cormistently (in 89% of cells test& showing long duration inhibition) an
increase in LTS burst size prior to the onset of inhibition compared to burst size before
stimulation (see figure 3.5). Since the LTS behaves in an Tll or none' manner, the only
way to account for larger bursts is via greater lT de-inactivation which is mediated
throug h hyperpolarization. This finding suggests that the membrane becornes
hyperpolarized by the stimulation. This effect could be mediated either through
stimulation causing the release of GABA from afferent tenninals or initial excitation of
the recorded cell. causing activation of postsynaptic conductances (K+ channels or other
ion channels) leading to hyperpolarization (Sherman and Guillery. 2001). Since direct
stimulation effects on the cell body or dendrites seem unlikely given that large
myelinated fiben have been shown to be the most excitable neuronal element
(discussed further below), excitation of the cell body may be mediated through
antidromic activation. Depolarization of the cell body via antidromic activation could
activate the slow potassium channels required for the falling phase of the action
potential (Silverthom, 1998). Activation of these channels would hyperpolarize the cell
after the end of the stimulus train. However. the time course of hyperpolarization
mediated by these potassium channels rnay be too short for LTS de-inactiwation. On
the other hand, high frequency stimulus trains could activate the GABAergic fiber
terminals. More specifically, electrical stimulation could excite the afferent terminals of
the RE and intemeurons. The depolarization would cause GABA release into the
synaptic cleft and subsequent hyperpolarization in the thalamocortical relay cells. This
could explain the large rebound LTS bunts described in the results. LTS de-
%activation requires hyperpdarimtion of at least 50-100msec in duration. Metabotropic
receptors generally have higher activation thresholds than ionotropic receptors and are
capable of producing lPSPs long enough (100-1000msec) to de-inactivate IT. This
could account for why high frequency stimulus trains are needed to generate the long
duration inhibition (this is in contrast to the previously described low frequency
stimulation effects in thalamus which are hypothesized to result in the net activation of
ionotropic glutamatergic synapses). If the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory metabotropic
recepton favors the inhibitory ones, there would be a net inhibitory effect. Closer
p d r n i t y of the stimulation electrode may be able to better activate metabotropic
receptors by activating a larger number of afferent tenninals. This would cause more
transmitter release and increased membrane hyperpolarization through spatial
summation and may explain why stimulation effects in the thalamus were only obseived
at close distances. It should be noted that the metabotropic GABA8 receptors and the
LTS generating calcium channels are located in similar dendritic areas. Thus, the
metabotropic GABAe receptors on relay cells would be in an ideal position to de-
inactivate the LTS channels, via sustained hyperpolarization. At the high frequencies
that are generally required to elicit this response, temporal summation of the ionotropic
GABh receptor could also contribute to de-inactivation of Ir indirectly. However,
GABAr, receptors activate a chloride channel that generates a transient JPSP (10 ms
latency) which tends to hyperpolarize the membrane to no more than -70 to -75 mV
(the equiiibrium potential for the chloride ion). Although, this would prevent the
generation of further EPSP's due to efferent input, it would be unlikely to strongly de-
inactivate lT by itseL GABAe receptors, which work through activation of K* leak
rcurrents, drive the membrane to around -IO0 mV for 100-1000msec. This is ideal for Il
de-inactivation and In activation. This would subsequently generate a strong rebound
LTS such as those seen following high frequency stimulus trains (See Fig. 3.5). RE
cells, as a population, are capable of acüvating both GABA receptor types but
intemeurons are probably only capable of activating the GAB& receptor although a
more thorough investigation is needed (Reviewed by Sherman and Guillery, 2001).
The anterior thalamic nuclei do not receive afferents from the thalamic reticular
nudeus. Interestingly, the cells tested in this area did not show long duration inhibition
or increased burst activity. This rnay be because sustained hyperpolarizations could not
be generated due to the lack of ineravation of the GABb receptor via the thalamic
reticular nucleus.
Stimulus frequency. intensity, and duration of train length al1 had an effect on burst
activity and resulted in shorter periods of bursting prior to the inhibitory period. This
suggests that other membrane conductance(s) may be acüvated at higher stimulation
thresholds that shorten the pre inhibitory period bursting.
4.3.2 Long Duration Inhibition
The long duration inhibitory effects of high frequency stimulation could result from
a number of different mechanisms. The fact that a period of LTS bursts occun after the
stimulation, and before the onset of inhibition, indicates that the inhibition is not
occurring through depolarization block of sodium channels. The results clearly show
robust action potential lring in a large portion of the cells prior to the onset of inhibition.
Another fact that has to be considered are the lengths of the inhibitory periods (typically
>2 seconds and up to 25 seconds in some cases). It is unlikely that local inhibitory - circuits via the reticular thalamus would produce inhibitory periods of this length.
Another observation that needs to be considered is that the stimulation effects were
only seen at stimulation sites that were in close proximity to the cell when compared
with stimulation studies of other basal ganglia structures (STN, SNr, and GPi). This
suggests that the neuronal elements that are being excited are in close proximity to the
cell. More specifically, in order for the stimulation effects to be observed, it may be
necessary to excite a larger proportion of afferents converging onto a cell. Another
reason for close proximity may be due to the excitation of the cell body via antidromic
activation (see below). Thalamic cells generally have the same electrophysiological
properties. Interestingly, long duration inhibition was typically observed in bursting tells
where it was dependent on stimulation frequency, current intensity, and stimulus train
length. Cells in the relay mode tend to be at more depolarized levels. Thus, the current
and frequency needed to cause hyperpolarization in these cells may be higher.
There is a slowly inactivating forrn of the IA channel (see Introduction) called IAs
which could hyperpolarize the membrane for periods long enough to stop action
potential generation for the lengths observed in this study (McCormick, 1991). As
discussed in the introduction, the family of IA currents have similar kinetics to lT (de-
inactivated by hyperpolarization and activated by subsequent depolarizations) although
both currents move in opposite directions and have opposite effects (IT is an inward
cunent mediated by Ca ''entry into the cell and lA is an outward current mediated by K'
exiting from the cell). The long duration inhibitory periods following the burst excitation
could be caused by activation of these voltage dependent K+ channels. They could
generate a moderately hyperpolarized membrane potential where IT is not strongly de- - ' inacüvated but hyperpolarized enough to prevent sodium action potentials via small
EPSPs or In. At such a membrane potential In may not be activated. Thus, long
duration inhibition could be a result of the slow inactivation time course of IA channels
that would hold the membrane at a potential where Ir is inactivated and sodium spikes
can not be generated. Studies in thalamic interneurons have shown that IA can
ovemde the LTS response completely (Pape et al., 1993). In fact, the I A ~ (subtype of IA
current) current has been mathematically modeled to cause inhibitory periods of up to
10 seconds in thalamic relay cells (Rush and Rinzel, 1994). Using this model, high
L
fiequency stimulus trains would cause a prolonged (repetitive) GABA release. This
would generate a prolonged hyperpolarization leading to de-inactivation of both IT and
1 . Depending on the relative proportion of lT and IA, IA could mask lT and stop bursting
activity. Theoretically, further hyperpolarization would saturate IA de-inactivation but
increase IT de-inactivation, and bursting activity would return (Rush and Rinzel, 1994).
Figure 4.1 illustrates this possible mechanism. First. as indicated during time period 1,
high frequency microstimulation would cause GABA release. Next, during time period
2, hyperpolarization would cause de-inactivation of lT and IA. Time period 3 indicates a
hyperpolarization level where IT masks (Ir is large enough to generate an LTS in the
presence of IA activation) any effects of IA aithough both are de-inactivated. Time period
4 indicates a membrane potential where there is not enough hyperpdarization for the IT
cunent to overcome the In current (both cunents would be deinadvatad).
Alternatively, the inhibition in time period 4 could be a result of a membrane potential
too depolarized for IT de-inactivation but hyperpolarized enough for lA de-inactivation.
An altemative mechanism for long du ration inhibition, for which some evidence
Thas recently been obtained from the STN, involves stimulation mediated blocking of
voltage gated ion channels (Beurrier et al., 2001). The study, done in the STN of rats
showed that long duration high fmquency macro and microstimulation (1 00-500Hz)
produced prolonged inhibition of neuronal Aring (up to 5mins) that was independent of
synaptic transmission. The study suggests that blockage of voltage gated ion channels
mediates the inhibitory effect of high freguency stimulation. The STN study showed
blockage of IT during the inhibitory period. However, the results of this thesis show LTS
bursting activity before the onset of inhibition suggesting that the inhibitory periods in
both studies are mediated through different mechanisms.
4.4 Possible Roie of Long Duration Inhibition in Therapeutic the
Effects of DBS
The findings of this thesis provide strong evidence that high frequency stimulation
can tead to hyperpolarization and long duration inhibition of neuron firing. There are a
number of studies that suggest that inhibition could be the mechanism underlying the
clinical effects of DBS. Microstirnulating at high frequencies in areas with tremor cells
(Vim and Vop) can cause tremor arrest. Furthermore, high frequency (100-1 8OHz) DBS
in simiiar regions (Virn) also causes tremor arrest, as is clinically used for treatment of
Parkinsonian and Essential tremor (reviewed by Lozano, 1998). In addition,
thalamotomies (thalamic lesions) in Vim are also used as clinical treatments for tremor.
Studies of injecting inhibitory dnigs into Vim show tremor reduction and tremor arrest.
More specifically, injection of muscimol (GABA agonist) (Pahapill, 1 999) and lidocaine
(sodium channel blocker) into Vim; have been shown to produce tremor arrest. In most /-
cases lidocaine mimicked the effects of thalamic lesions and microstimulation in similar
amas (Dostrovsky et al., 1993). Chronaxie siudies in Vim indicate that large myeiinated
fibers are the primary candidates for mediating trerpor arrest (Holsheimer et al., 2000).
Furthermore. chronaxie studies invoMng single pulse DBS stimulation (that could briefly
excite or inhibit ongoing €MG) of Vim during ongoing muscle contractions supports the
notion of preferential activation of myelinatad axons (Ashby and Rothwell, 2000). These
studies suggest that the long duration inhibitory effects may be mediated by excitation
of large myelinated fiber teminals that cause GABA release. This type of inhibition may
mediate the therapeutic effects of DBS in Vim either by stopping tremorgenic thalamic
cells or by disrupting the tremor circuitiy.
In spite of this, there are differences in DBS stimulation parameters that need to be
taken into consideration. First, the diameter of the stimulating electrode needs to be
considered. The DBS electrode has a much larger diameter tip than a microeledmde.
Thus, although more cunent (delivered over a much larger area) is delivered through
the DBS electrode, a rnicroelectrode delivers a higher cuvent density (over a very small
area). A DBS electrode would stimulate a much larger area of the thalamus, which
could result in different effects on cell firing. Using a macrostimulating electrode, which
has an electrode tip doser to the size of a DBS electrode, may partly resolve this issue.
Furthemore, DBS electrodes stimulate continuously and tremor stops quickfy once the
stimulus train starts. In addition, once the DBS electrode is turned off tremor retums
quickly. However, due to the stimulus artifact problern, it is not known what happens to
cell firing during long, high frequency stimulus trains. According to the results of a few
cells which were tested for increasing stimulus train lengths. increasing train length - ' produced longer inhibitory periods. According to the previously described model (Fig.
4.1). prolonged stimulation would result in continued release of GABA resulting in
sustained membrane hyperpolarization. Although both IT and IA would be de-
inactivated, they would not get activateâ due to the sustained hyperpolarization. At the
end of the stimulus train In could generate a depdarization that would activate the
conductances.
4.5 Technical Problems Associated With Y icrostimulation and
Recording Studies
The techniques used in these types of microstimulation and recording studies have
potential problems and limitations. When conducting studies in human patients there is
only a short time that can be devoted to examine the effects of stimulation. Because of
this, frequency and current thresholds could not be obtained for a large portion of the
cells. Another limitation results when stimulating from the same electrode that is being
used to record from (studied on 44 cells). This does not allow for obseiving effects
during the stimulus train and, thsre is a 150-2OOmsec period after the delivery of the
stimulus train when no recordings can be made. This prevents determining short
latency effects when using just the recording electrode. Using the dual electrode set up
(studied on a total of 28 cells), this problem can be partly solved. In this setup, neurons
can be recorded during the stimulus train and immediately following it. However,
another problem, involving the stimulus artifact is present. Typically, stimulus artifacts r
last 1 msec. At high frequencies, such as 1 OOHz the stimulus artifact obscures the
recording for -10% of the train. This increases for larger currents and higher
frequencies making it difficult to decipher the neuron's firing pattern during the stimulus
train. This limits the results to observing effects after the stimulus train. Another
problem involves analyzing populations of cells that have slow or irregular firing
patterns. It is difficult to define periods of inhibition in these cells because inhibition is
hard to distinguish fmm spontaneous pauses in the cell's firing. These cells were not
included in the study although they may constitute a signifiant portion of thalamic
neurons that may or may not have different response properties to high frequency
microstimulation.
4.6.1 Future Direction (Human Studies)
There are a number of Mure experiments that can be done in humans to confin
the interpretation of the results for this study. Drug injection studies, using GABA
agonists, could be performed to see if similar inhibitory periods can be generated by
micro injecting GABA locally. This would help confimi or refute the possibility of the
effects being mediated by GABA. Furthemore, GA& or GABAe receptor antagonists
could be used during high frequency stimulation to see if they block the inhibitory effect.
Also, stimulation of tremor cells could be done to see if they are inhibited in the same
manner as the cells tested in this study. A study using long stimulation trains (around 1
min) should be carried out to detenine the effects of prolonged stimulus trains as is the
case for therapeutic DES. Chronaxie studies should also be done to detemine what
neuronal elements are eliciting the long duration inhibitory effects. Macrostirnulation,
which is similar to DBS stimulation, should be done to observe the effects of wider r current spread. Finally, a newly developed microdialysis technique. can be used to
skidy the effect of DBS on neurotransmitter levels.
4.6.2 Future Direction (Animal Studies) .
A study using long stimulus trains should be done to determine if synapse
independent (using blockers of synaptic transmission such as cobalt), long (over 1 min)
inhibitory periods similar to the STN study (Beurrier et al., 2001 ; described above) can
be generated. Chronaxie studies in monkeys, which can be perforrned in more detail
than in humans, wouW confinn or refute that large rnyelinated fibers are the excitable
--- - elements eliciting long duration inhibition. Furthermore, the intracellular effects of high
frequency stimulation c m be obseived using intracellular recordhg methods.
Figure 4.1
Model For Stimulus Generated lnhibitory Period
r -
1. High frequency microstimulation causing GABA release.
-
3. Large rebound LTS bursts generated via I, de-inactivation (at this hyperpolarited membrane potential the IT current swamps any effects mediated by IA) (See Fig. 3.5).
2. Hyperpolarization via GABA causing 1, deinacüvation and 1, de-inactivation
4. Membrane potential where there is not enough hyperpdarkation for the IT wrrent to overcome the lA airrent (bgth currents would be dainacüvated) thus no bursting is observed. Alternatively. the inhib'ion coutd be the result of a membrane potential too depolarUed for I, de-inatiivation but hyperpolarized enough for IA
1 de-inactivation. 1
2 seconds 1
bursting ceIl37501
References:
Adams PR. Voltagedependant conductances of vertebrate neurons. Trends Neurosci. 1982 5, 1 16-1 19.
Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of paraltel processing . Trends Neurosci. 1 990 Jul; 1 3(7):266-7 1. Review.
Ashby P, Rothwell JC. Neurophysiologie aspects of deep brain stimulation. Neurology. 2OOO;55(12 Suppl6):S17-20. Review.
Benauout A, Hallett M. Mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation. Neurology. 2OOO;55(12 Suppl 6):S13-6. Review.
Beurrier C, Bioulac B. Audin J, Hammond C. High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;85 (4):13516.
Buford JA, hase M. Anderson ME. Contrasting locations of pallidal-receiving neurons and microexcitable zones in primate thalamus. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Mar,75(3):110516.
Crabtree JW. lntrathalamic sensory connections mediated by the thalamic reticular nucleus. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999 Nov 15;56[7-8):683-700. Review.
' Crossman AR. Functional anatomy of movement disorders. J Anat. 2000 May;196 ( Pt 4):5l 9-25. Review.
Destexhe A, Neubig M. Ulrich O, Huguenard J. Dendritic low-threshold calcium currents in thalamk relay cells. J Neurosci. 1998 May 1 531 8(l O):3574-88.
Dostrovsky JO, Levy R, Wu JP, Hutchison WD, Tasker RR, Lozano AM. Microstimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal firing in human globus pallidus. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Ju1;84(1):57M.
Dostrovsky JO, Sher GD. Davis KD, Panent AG, Hutchison WD, Tasker RR. Microinjection of lidocaine into hurnan thalamus: a useful tool in stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg . 1 993;60(4): 1 68-74.
- .-- Fitzpatrick D, Diamond IT, Raczkowski D. Cholinergic and monoaminergic inneivation of the cat's thalamus: cornparison of the lateral geniculate nucleus with other principal sensory nuclei. J Comp Neurol. 1989 Oct 22;288(4):647-75.
Gildenberg PL, Tasker RR. Textbook of Stemotactic and Functional Neumsurgery. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Guiterrez C, Cox CL, Sherman, SM. Submitted for Publication. 1999.
Goldman MS, Ahlskog JE, Kelly PJ. The syrnptornatic and functional outcome of stereotactic thalamotomy for medically intractable essential tremor. J Neurosurg. 1992 Jun;76(6):924-8
Hallett M, Dubinsky RM. Glucose metabolism in the brain of patients with essential tremor. J Neurol Sci. 1993 Jan;114(1):458.
Hirai Tt Jones EG. A new parcellation of the human thalamus on the basis of histochemical staining. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1 989 Jan-Mar; l4(l): 1 -34.
Holsheimer J, Demeulemeester H, Nuttin B, de Sutter P. Identification of the target neuronal elements in eleclrical deep brain stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Cec; 1 2(12):4573-7.
Holsheimer J, Oijkstra EA. Demeulemeester H, Nuttin B. Chronaxie calculated from current-duration and voltageduration data. J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Apr 1 ;97(1):4550.
/-
Huguenard JR, Prince DA. A novel T-type current underlies proknged calcium dependent bursting firing in GABAergic neurons of rat thalamic retiuclar nucleus. J Neurosci. 1992 12,3804-381 7.
Hutchison WDl Allan RJ, Opitz H, Levy R, Dostrovsky JO, Lang AE, Lozano AM. Neurophysiological identification of the subthalamic nucleus in surgery for Parkinson's disease. Ann Neu ml. 1 998 Oct;44(4):622-(1.
Jahnsen H, Llinas R. lonic basis for the electro-responsiveness and oscillatory properties of guineagig thalamic neurones in vitro. J Physiol. 1984 Apr;349:227-47.
Jahnsen Hl Llinas R. Etectrophysiological properties of guinea-pig thalarnic neurones: an in vitro study. J Physiol. 1984 Apr;349:205-26
Jankovic J. Complications and limitations of drug thempy for Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 2000;55(12 Suppl6):S2-6. Review.
Jeanmonod D, Magnin M. Morel A. Low-threshold calcium spike bursts in the human thalamus. Common physiopathology for sensory, motor and limbic positive symptoms. Brain. 1996 Apr, 1 1 9 ( Pt 2):363-75.
Jones EG, The Thalamus. New York: Plenum, 1985.
Koller WC, Pahwa PR, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB. Deep brain stimulation of the Vim nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of tremor. Neurology. 2000;55(12 Suppl6):S29-33. Review.
Lenz FA, Dostrovsky JO, Kwan HC, Tasker RR, Yamashiro K, Murphy JT. Methods for microstimulation and recording of single neumns and evoked potentials in the human central nervous system. J Neurosurg. 1988 Apr;68(4):630-4,
Llinas R, Jahnsen H. Electrophysiology of mammalian thalamic neurones in vitro. Nature. 1 982 Jun 3;297(5865):406-8. No abstract available.
Llinas R, Yarorn Y. Electroph ysiolog y of mammalian inferior olivaty neurones in vitro. Different types of voltagedependent ionic conductances. J Physiol. 1981 Jun3i 5549-67.
Llinas R, Yarom Y. -Properties and distribution of ionic conductances generating electroresponsiveness of mammalian inferior olivary neurones in vitro. J Physiol. 1981 Jun;315:569-84.
Lozano AM. -
Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Control of Trernor. Neumurgical Opemtive Atlas. Vol. 7. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. 1998.
Lu SM, Guido W, Sherman SM. Effects of membrane voltage on receptive field properties of lateral geniculate neurons in the cat: contributions of the low-threshold Ca2+ conductance. J Neurophysiol. 1992 Dec;68(6):2 1 85-98.
Martüla RJ, Rautakorpi 1, Rinne UK. The relation of essential tremor to Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Ju1;47(7):734-5.
McComick DA. Fundional Properties of a Slowly lnadivating Potassium Current in Guinea Pig Donal Lateral Geniculate Relay Neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct; 66(4):1176-1189.
McCormick DA, von Krosigk M. Corticothalamic activation modulates thalamic firing thmugh glutamate "metabotropic" recepton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1 ;89(7):2774-8.
Nowak tGv Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell, bodies and axon initial segments. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb; 1 18(4):489500.
Nowak LG, Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. 1. Evidence from chronaxie measurements. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(4):477-88.
Nuttin 8, Cosyns P, Demeulemeester H, Gybels J, Meyenon B. Electrical stimulation in anterior limbs of intemal capsules in patients with obsessive- compulsive disotder. Lancet. 1 999 Oct 30;354(9189): 1 526.
Obeso JA, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Rodriguez M. Lanciego JL, Artieda J, Gonzalo N, Olanow CW. Pathophysiology of the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(lO Suppl):S8-19. Review.
Olanow CW, Brin MF, Obeso JA. The role of deep brain stimulation as a surgical treatment for Parkinson's disease. Neumlogy. 2OOO;55(12 Suppl6):S60-6. Review.
-Pahapill PA, Levy R, Dostrovsky JO, Davis KD, Rezai AR, Tasker RR, Lozano AM. ' Tremor anest with thalamic microinjections of muscimol in patients with essential tremor. Ann Neurol. 1 999 Aug;46(2):249-52.
Pare 0, Steriade M. Deschenes Mv Oakson G. Physiological characteristics of anterior thalamic nuclei, a group devoid of inputs from reticular thalamic nucleus. J Neurophysiol. 1987 Jun;57(6): 1 669-85.
Radhakrishnan V, Tsoukatos J, Davis KD, Tasker RR, Lozano AM, Dostrovsky JO. A cornparison of the burst activity of lateral thalamic neurons in chronic pain and non- pain patients. Pain. 1999 Apr;80(3):567-75.
Ramcharan EJ, Cox CL, Zhan XJ, Sherman SM, Gnadt JW. Cellular mechanisms underlying activity patterns in the monkey thalamus during visual behavior. J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4): 1982-7.
Ramcharan EJ, Gnadt JW, Sherman SM. Burst and tonic firing in thalamic cells of unanesthetized, behaving monkeys. Vis Neurosci. 2000 Jan-Feb; 1 7(1):55-62.
Ranck JB Jr. Which elements are excited in electncal stimulation of mammalian central nenrous system: a review. Brain Res. 1975 Nov 21 ;98(3):417-40. Review.
Rush ME, Rinzel Je Analysis of bursting in a thalamic neuron model. Biol Cybem. 1 994;71(4):281-9l.
Schaltenbrand O, Wahren W. Atlas for stemotexy of the human brain. Stuttgart: George Thierne, 1977.
Sherman SM. Tonic and burst firing: dual modes of thalamocortical relay. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Feb;N(Z): 1 22-6. Review.
Sherman SM, Guilleiy RW. Explotfng The Thalamus. New York: Academic Press, 2001.
Silverthorn DU. Human Physiology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.
Steriade M, Llinas RR. The functional states of the thalamus and the associated neuronal interplay. Physiol Rev. 1988 Ju1;68(3):649-742. Review.
Steriade M, Jones EG, Llinas RR. r
Thalamie Oscillations and Signaling. Toronto: JO hn Wiley and Sons, 1 990.
Storm JF. Potassium cunents in hippocampe1 pyramidal cells. Prog Brain Res. lWO;83: 161 -87. Review
Tasker RR, Kiss ZH. The role of the thalamus in functional neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1995 Jan;6(1):73-104. Review.
Tehovnik EJ. Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses. J Neurosci Methods. 1 996 Mar;65(1): 1-1 7. Review.
Tsoukatos J. Kiss M, Davis KD, Tasker RR. Dostmvsky JO. Patterns of neuronal firing in the human lateral thalamus during sleep and wakefulness. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Feb;113(2):273-82
Wang XJ, Rinzel J, Rogawski MA. A model of the T-type calcium cunent and the low-threshold spike in thalamic neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Sep;66(3):839-50.
Zhan XJ, Cox CL, Sherman SM. Dendiitic depolarkation efficiently attenuates low-threshold calcium spikes in thalamic relay cells. J Neurosci. 2000 May 1 5;2O(l O):3909-14.