OFFICIAL RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER

ADRIAN FONTES20180889526,12/04/2018 10:56

Electronic Recording 32927-8-l-l-,N

RESOLUTION NO. 11323

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA, DECLARING THE OFFICIAL CANVASS OF VOTES CAST IN THE CITY OF SCOTTSDALE GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 6, 2018; AND DECLARING THE ELECTION OF THREE COUNCILMEMBERS.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 9, Section 1, of the Scottsdale City Charter, the City of Scottsdale held a General/Special Election on November 6, 2018, for the purpose of electing three Councilmembers and submitting one question and one proposition to the voters; and

WHEREAS, on May 1, 2018, the Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 11124, and, subsequently, on July 3, 2018, adopted Resolution No. 11203, calling a Special Election for November 6, 2018, and submitting to the qualified electors of the City of Scottsdale the question of authorizing an increase in the rate of transaction privilege and use taxes in the city by 0.10 percent (0.10%) for a period often (10) years to provide funds for transportation improvement projects; and

WHEREAS, the proposed transaction privilege and use taxes increase was submitted to the voters at the November 6, 2018 General/Special Election as Question 1; and

WHEREAS, on July 26, 2018, an amendment to the Scottsdale City Charter proposed by initiative petition to prohibit the alteration of the natural state of preserve lands and limit the use of preserve funds for any purpose other than those specifically outlined in the proposed amendment unless authorized by Scottsdale registered voters at a general or special election was certified for inclusion on the November 6, 2018 General/Special Election as Proposition 420; and

WHEREAS, A.R.S. § 16-642 requires that the City Council canvass the returns of the election no later than twenty (20) days following the election; and

WHEREAS, the City Council, having canvassed the returns of the November 6, 2018 General/Special Election, finds the returns to be as stated in this resolution;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale as follows:

1. The results of the election having been determined, the official canvass of the City of Scottsdale General/Special Election held on November 6, 2018 is as follows:

a) A summary of the number of votes cast in each precinct for each candidate for the office of councilmember and for Question 1 and Proposition 420 is shown on Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Resolution No. 11323 November 26, 2018 Page 2 of 2

b) A precinct group detail of the number of rejected ballots by precinct is shown on Exhibit B, which is attached and incorporated by this reference.

2. The following three named candidates, having received the first, second, and third highest number of votes cast in the November 6, 2018 General Election for the office of councilmember, were elected to four-year terms:

Kathy Littlefield Solange Whitehead Linda Milhaven

3. Question 1, authorizing an increase in the rate of transaction privilege and use taxes in the City by 0.10 percent (0.10%) for a period of ten (10) years to provide funds for transportation improvement projects, having received a number of votes that was more than a majority of the votes cast, was approved by the qualified voters at the November 6, 2018 Special Election.

4. Proposition 420, proposed by initiative petition to amend the City Charter to prohibit the alteration of the natural state of preserve lands and limit the use of preserve funds for any purpose other than those specifically outlined in the proposed amendment unless authorized by Scottsdale registered voters at a general or special election, having received a number of votes that was more than a majority of the votes cast, was approved by the qualified voters at the November 6, 2018 Special Election.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Scottsdale this 26*^^ day ofNovember 2018.

CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, an Arizona municipafcorporation

W. J. “Jim\ Laj?[§l, Mayor

ATTEST

—Carolyn J^ger, Qty

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

4/a.Bri^e Washburn, City AttorneyBy: Janis Bladine, Sr. Assistant City Attorney

RESOLUCION NUM. 11323

UNA RESOLUCION DEL CONCEJO DE LA CIUDAD DE SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA, DECLARANDO EL ESCRUTINIO OFICIAL DE VOTOS EMITIDOS EN LA CIUDAD DE SCOTTSDALE EN LA ELECCI6N GENERAL/ESPECIAL QUE SE LLEVO A CABO EL 6 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018; Y DECLARANDO LA ELECCION DE TRES MIEMBROS DEL CONCEJO.

CONSIDERANDO QUE, de conformidad con el Articulo 9, Seccion 1, de la Constitucion de la Ciudad de Scottsdale, la Ciudad de Scottsdale llevo a cabo una Eleccion General/Especial el 6 de noviembre de 2018 con el proposito de elegir tres Concejales y presenter una pregunta y una proposicion a los votantes; y

CONSIDERANDO QUE, el 1 de mayo de 2018, el Alcalde y el Concejo Municipal adoptaron la Resolucion Num. 11124, y, posteriormente, el 3 de julio de 2018, adoptaron la Resolucion Num. 11203, convocando a una Eleccion Especial para el 6 de noviembre de 2018, y presentando a los electores con derecho a voto de la Ciudad de Scottsdale la pregunta de autorizacion de un aumento en la tasa de privilegio de transaccion e impuestos de uso en la ciudad de un 0.10 por ciento (0.10%) por un perlodo de diez (10) anos para proveer fondos para proyectos de mejoramiento de transporte; y

CONSIDERANDO QUE, el propuesto aumento al privilegio de transaccion e impuestos de uso se presento a los votantes en la Eleccion General/Especial del 6 de noviembre 6 de 2018 como Pregunta 1; y

CONSIDERANDO QUE, el 26 de julio de 2018, una enmienda a la Constitucion de la Ciudad de Scottsdale propuesta por peticion de iniciativa para prohibir la alteracion del estado natural de las tierras de preservacion y limitar el uso de fondos de conservacion para cualquier proposito aparte de los detallados especificamente en la enmienda propuesta a menos que sea autorizado por los electores inscritos de Scottsdale en una eleccion general o especial fue certificada para inclusion en la eleccion general/especial del 6 de noviembre de 2018 como Proposicion 420; y

CONSIDERANDO QUE, A.R.S. § 16-642 requiere que el Concejo Municipal verifique los resultados de la eleccion a mas tardar veinte (20) dias despues de la eleccion; y

CONSIDERANDO QUE, el Concejo de la Ciudad, despues de haber examinado los resultados de la Eleccion General/Especial del 6 de noviembre de 2018, encuentra los resultados de acuerdo con lo que se indica en esta resolucion;

AHORA POR LO TANTO, SEA RESUELTO por el Concejo de la Ciudad de Scottsdale lo siguiente:

1. Habiendo sido determinados los resultados de la eleccion, el escrutinio oficial de la Eleccion General/Especial de la Ciudad de Scottsdale celebrada el 6 de noviembre de 2018 es el siguiente:

Resolucion Num. 1132326 de noviembre de 2018Pagina 2 de 2

a) Un resumen del numero de votes emitidos en cada recinto para cada candidate para el puesto de concejal y para la Pregunta 1 y la Proposicion 420 se muestra en el Anexo A, que se adjunta e incorpora a esta referencia.

b) Un detalle de grupo de recinto del numero de papeletas rechazadas por recinto se muestra en el Anexo B, que se adjunta e incorpora a esta referencia.

2. Los siguientes tres candidates nombrados, habiendo recibido el primer, segundo y tercer mayor numero de votes emitidos en la Eleccion General del 6 de noviembre de 2018 para el puesto de concejal, fueron elegidos a terminos de cuatro afios:

Kathy Littlefield Solange Whitehead Linda Milhaven

3. La Pregunta 1, autorizando un aumento en la tasa de privilegio de transaccion e impuestos de uso en la Ciudad de un 0.10 por ciento (0.10%) por un periodo de diez (10) ahos para proporcionar fondos para proyectos de mejoramiento de transporte, habiendo recibido un numero de votes superior a una mayoria de los votes emitidos, fue aprobado por los votantes con derecho a vote en la Eleccion Especial del 6 de noviembre de 2018.

4. La Proposicion 420, propuesta por peticion de iniciativa para enmendar la Constitucion de la Ciudad para prohibir la alteracion del estado natural de las tierras de preservacion y limitar el uso de los fondos de conservacion para cualquier proposito aparte de los detallados especificamente en la enmienda propuesta a menos que sea autorizado por los electores inscritos de Scottsdale en una eleccion general o especial, habiendo recibido un numero de votos superior a una mayoria de los votos emitidos, fue aprobado por los votantes con derecho a voto en la Eleccion Especial del 6 de noviembre de 2018.

APROBADO Y ADOPTADO por el Concejo de la Ciudad de Scottsdale este dia 26 deNoviembre de 2018.

CIUDAD DE SCOTTSDALE,una corporacion municipal de Arizona

/s/ W. J. “Jim” Lane, Alcalde

CERTIFICA:

/s/ Carolyn dagger, Secretaria de la Ciudad

APROBADO EN CUANTO A FORMA;Bruce Washburn, Abogado de la Ciudad/s/ por: Janis Bladine, Sr. Asistente del Abogado de la Ciudad

November 26,2018RESOLUTION NO. 11323/RESOLUCION NO. 11323

EXHIBIT “A’VDOCUMENTO DE PRUEBA “A”OFFICIAL CANVASS/EXAMEN OFICIAL DE VOTAS CITY OF SCOTTSDALE/CIUDAD DE SCOTTSDALE

NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION/6 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 ELECCION GENERAUESPECIAL

Council

CRAWFORD, BILL LITTLEFIELD, KATHY MILHAVEN, LINDA SMITH, DAVID N. WHITEHEAD, SOLANGE

Council

CRAWFORD, BILL LITTLEFIELD, KATHY MILHAVEN, LINDA SMITH, DAVID N. WHITEHEAD, SOLANGE

Council

1 0041 I

ooso

0108 1 0120 1 0140 1 0167 1 0170 | 0171 | 0179 | 0200 | 0271 | 0272 | 0319 | 0320| 0361 1

580 884 712 805 469 808 1595 173 878 764 620 914 581 909 411 466817 1387 925 1139 679 1069 2488 286 1090 996 896 1802 853 1537 671 583575 908 825 991 524 802 1299 231 1061 743 690 991 628 1039 439 485428 824 685 816 442 595 1099 148 874 702 487 842 516 980 322 367684 1180 828 941 476 966 2324 244 989 872 821 1464 652 1236 593 525

1 0375 1 0399 1 0410 1 0411 1 0413 1 0425 | 0429 | 0442 | 0469 | 0486 | 0489 | 0492 | 0504 | 0505 | 05061 0507 1

557 766 1362 194 717 908 842 989 622 360 661 1338 692 811 1654 626780 967 1861 307 918 1522 1196 1365 1033 495 1109 1885 980 1094 2872 950514 722 1560 242 737 1050 873 1109 813 429 648 1403 703 866 1678 776481 572 1364 174 539 780 729 1003 570 369 756 1204 631 721 1768 659574 829 1685 289 839 1353 958 1348 878 399 878 1585 903 860 2231 788

1 0519 1 0531 1 0534 1 0537 1 0562 | 0570 { 0571 | 0577 | 0580 | 0584 | 0594 | 0600 | 0633 | 0647 | 06571 0660 1

CRAWFORD, BILL 874 650 295 547 661 298 447 662 1045 635 871 1049 484 583 329 423LITTLEFIELD, KATHY 1130 970 442 875 847 466 795 1026 1341 1110 1106 1604 672 730 423 624MILHAVEN, LINDA 950 806 345 691 669 387 660 767 1104 844 961 1290 511 671 377 423SMITH, DAVID N. 713 607 257 601 511 285 445 640 830 613 839 1013 462 556 276 403WHITEHEAD, SOLANGE 1040 894 394 737 678 469 645 938 1137 1003 1083 1575 602 639 364 643

Council I 0666 I 0698 | 0722 | 0726 | 07471

CRAWFORD, BILL 1271 685 1398 103 562LITTLEFIELD, KATHY 1910 905 2496 108 697MILHAVEN, LINDA 1228 706 1283 88 528

SMITH, DAVID N. 1142 497 1043 92 432

WHITEHEAD, SOLANGE 1498 871 2493 105 649

Percent PercentCouncil Votes Votes Cast Ballots Cast

CRAWFORD, BILL 38,540 17.37% 32.31% TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS 167,181

LITTLEFIELD, KATHY 56,829 25.62% 47.64% TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 119,298

MILHAVEN, LINDA 41,643 18.77% 34.91% VOTER TURNOUT 71.36%

SMITH, DAVID N. 34,704 15.64% 29.09% TOTAL REJECTED BALLOTS* 308

WHITEHEAD, SOLANAGE 49,649 22.38% 41.62% OVER VOTES 504

Total Council Candidate Votes 221,365 UNDER VOTES 135,552Unqualified Write-ins* 473 0.21% 0.40%Total Votes incl. Unqualified Write-ins 221,838 '20 Bad Signatures, 118 Returned Late, 170 No Signati

'There were no qualified write-in candidates for this election

RESOLUTION NO. 11323 EXHIBIT "A'VRESOLUCION NO. 11323 DOCUMENTO DE PRUEBA “A” PAGE 2 OF 3/PAGINA 2 DE 3

PREqNpj; -PRECINCT V' Ballots Turnout Question 1NUMBER : NAME - * Voters Cast Yes . , No'.-i. ^ %

0041 BARNES 1989 1528 76.82% 822 58.71% 578 41.29%0060 BRONCO 3451 2713 78.61% 1276 51.33% 1210 48.67%0070 CACTUS GLEN 2788 2116 75.90% 1045 54.51% 872 45.49%0108 CIELO 3395 2490 73.34% 1215 53.15% 1071 46.85%0120 COCOPAH 2044 1422 69.57% 679 53.13% 599 46.87%0140 CORONADO 3557 2268 63.76% 1171 56.82% 890 43.18%0167 DC RANCH 6737 4881 72.45% 2347 53.21% 2064 46.79%0170 DEERVIEW 1091 687 62.97% 294 47.96% 319 52.04%0171 DEL JOYA 3233 2574 79.62% 1388 59.19% 957 40.81%0179 DESERT HIGHLANDS 2847 2191 76.96% 1078 53.45% 939 46.55%0200 DREYFUS 2649 1956 73.84% 915 50.97% 880 49.03%0271 GRANITE MOUNTAIN 3799 3151 82.94% 1683 57.42% 1248 42.58%0272 GRAYHAWK 2300 1783 77.52% 829 51.30% 787 48.70%0319 HUALAPAI 4253 3039 71.46% 1474 53.58% 1277 46.42%0320 HUBBELL 1952 1276 65.37% 665 57.13% 499 42.87%0361 LAUREL 1777 1277 71.86% 585 50.43% 575 49.57%0375 LOMA VERDES 2017 1566 77.64% 703 48.92% 734 51.08%0399 MARICOPA 3114 2036 65.38% 1021 54.95% 837 45.05%0410 MCCORMICK RANCH 5771 4254 73.71% 2180 56.45% 1682 43.55%0411 MCDONALD 964 668 69.29% 329 54.47% 275 45.53%0413 SUPAI 3593 2043 56.86% 937 50.43% 921 49.57%0425 MIRADA 5278 3293 62.39% 1540 51.96% 1424 48.04%0429 MOHAVE 3681 2502 67.97% 1256 55.11% 1023 44.89%0442 MUSTANG 4234 3168 74.82% 1715 58.75% 1204 41.25%0469 PAIUTE 4016 2216 55.18% 1082 54.21% 914 45.79%0486 PARK MEADOWS 1412 1094 77.48% 527 52.49% 477 47.51%0489 PEAK VIEW 2504 2046 81.71% 952 50.58% 930 49.42%0492 PECOS 4991 3651 73.15% 1935 58.58% 1368 41.42%0504 PIMA 2918 2034 69.71% 1030 55.44% 828 44.56%0505 PINE VALLEY 3143 2378 75.66% 1119 51.57% 1051 48.43%0506 PINNACLE PEAK 6563 5327 81.17% 2558 52.18% 2344 47.82%0507 PINNACLE WEST 2561 2147 83.83% 1006 52.70% 903 47.30%0519 PUEBLO 5004 2686 53.68% 1402 57.74% 1026 42.26%0531 REDWING 3273 2203 67.31% 1155 57.61% 850 42.39%0534 RHODES 1750 979 55.94% 432 48.38% 461 51.62%0537 RIO MONTANA 2566 1891 73.69% 996 56.30% 773 43.70%0562 SALT RIVER 2884 1764 61.17% 821 51.60% 770 48.40%0570 SAN SIMON 1390 1024 73.67% 555 58.48% 394 41.52%0571 SAN VICTOR 2475 1654 66.83% 755 51.71% 705 48.29%0577 SANTO 2893 2189 75.67% 1039 52.69% 933 47.31%0580 SCOTTSDALE 4823 3152 65.35% 1630 58.01% 1180 41.99%0584 SENTRY 3513 2376 67.63% 1180 54.60% 981 45.40%0594 SIERRA HILLS 3290 2596 78.91% 1280 53.80% 1099 46.20%0600 SILVER SPUR 4796 3511 73.21% 1718 53.27% 1507 46.73%0633 STONEGATE 1984 1503 75.76% 720 52.52% 651 47.48%0647 SUNDOWN 2361 1789 75.77% 918 56.98% 693 43.02%0657 MCKELLIPS PARK 1684 924 54.87% 415 49.52% 423 50.48%0660 SUTTON 1931 1383 71.62% 682 53.49% 593 46.51%0666 TERRAVITA 4337 3532 81.44% 1746 54.12% 1480 45.88%0698 VIRGINIA 2945 1885 64.01% 978 56.93% 740 43.07%0722 WESTWORLD 6142 4763 77.55% 2518 57.69% 1847 42.31%0726 WHITTON 384 268 69.79% 154 63.64% 88 36.36%0747 YUMA 2134 1451 67.99% 763 57.76% 558 42.24%

TOTALS 167181 119298 71.33% 59213 54.50% 49432 45.50%

Question 1 VotesPercent

Votes Cast

Percent

Ballots CastTOTAL REGISTERED VOTERSTOTAL BALLOTS CAST

167,181119,298

Yes 59,213 64.50% 49.63%VOTER TURNOUTTOTAL REJECTED BALLOTS*

71.36%308

No 49.432 45.50% 41.44% OVER VOTES 91

Total Votes 108,645 UNDER VOTES

*20 Bad Signatures, 118 Returned Late, 170 No Signatures

10,562

RESOLUTION NO. 11323 EXHIBIT "A’VRESOLUCION NO. 11323 DOCUMENTO DE PRUEBA “A” PAGE 3 OF 3/PAGINA 3 DE 3

PRECINCTNUMBER

V precinctNAME , 5 Voters

BallotsCast

i Turnout Prop 420Yes % No %

0041 BARNES 1989 1528 76.82% 943 66.83% 468 33.17%0060 BRONCO 3451 2713 78.61% 1848 72.99% 684 27.01%0070 CACTUS GLEN 2788 2116 75.90% 1345 68.76% 611 31.24%0108 CIELO 3395 2490 73.34% 1622 69.14% 724 30.86%0120 COCOPAH 2044 1422 69.57% 814 62.95% 479 37.05%0140 CORONADO 3557 2268 63.76% 1373 67.04% 675 32.96%0167 DC RANCH 6737 4881 72.45% 3898 83.94% 746 16.06%0170 DEERVIEW 1091 687 62.97% 417 68.03% 196 31.97%0171 DEL JOYA 3233 2574 79.62% 1562 65.66% 817 34.34%0179 DESERT HIGHLANDS 2847 2191 76.96% 1535 73.90% 542 26.10%0200 DREYFUS 2649 1956 73.84% 1340 72.51% 508 27.49%0271 GRANITE MOUNTAIN 3799 3151 82.94% 2160 73.15% 793 26.85%0272 GRAYHAWK 2300 1783 77.52% 1179 72.02% 458 27.98%0319 HUALAPAI 4253 3039 71.46% 1983 72.32% 759 27.68%0320 HUBBELL 1952 1276 65.37% 826 70.66% 343 29.34%0361 LAUREL 1777 1277 71.86% 816 68.34% 378 31.66%0375 LOMA VERDES 2017 1566 77.64% 982 67.68% 469 32.32%0399 MARICOPA 3114 2036 65.38% 1272 67.37% 616 32.63%0410 MCCORMICK RANCH 5771 4254 73.71% 2773 70.49% 1161 29.51%0411 MCDONALD 964 668 69.29% 448 72.03% 174 27.97%0413 SUPAI 3593 2043 56.86% 1275 68.81% 578 31.19%0425 MIRADA 5278 3293 62.39% 2329 76.06% 733 23.94%0429 MOHAVE 3681 2502 67.97% 1591 67.96% 750 32.04%0442 MUSTANG 4234 3168 74.82% 2063 69.27% 915 30.73%0469 PAIUTE 4016 2216 55.18% 1442 71.32% 580 28.68%0486 PARK MEADOWS 1412 1094 77.48% 682 66.73% 340 33.27%0489 PEAK VIEW 2504 2046 81.71% 1395 73.19% 511 26.81%0492 PECOS 4991 3651 73.15% 2299 67.90% 1087 32.10%0504 PIMA 2918 2034 69.71% 1279 68.62% 585 31.38%0505 PINE VALLEY 3143 2378 75.66% 1552 70.10% 662 29.90%0506 PINNACLE PEAK 6563 5327 81.17% 3801 75.37% 1242 24.63%0507 PINNACLE WEST 2561 2147 83.83% 1384 71.41% 554 28.59%0519 PUEBLO 5004 2686 53.68% 1746 71.09% 710 28.91%0531 REDWING 3273 2203 67.31% 1378 68.18% 643 31.82%0534 RHODES 1750 979 55.94% 609 66.92% 301 33.08%0537 RIO MONTANA 2566 1891 73.69% 1221 68.48% 562 31.52%0562 SALT RIVER 2884 1764 61.17% 1005 63.69% 573 36.31%0570 SAN SIMON 1390 1024 73.67% 705 72.09% 273 27.91%0571 SAN VICTOR 2475 1654 66.83% 1033 68.09% 484 31.91%0577 SANTO 2893 2189 75.67% 1425 70.13% 607 29.87%0580 SCOTTSDALE 4823 3152 65.35% 1881 66.84% 933 33.16%0584 SENTRY 3513 2376 67.63% 1662 74.40% 572 25.60%0594 SIERRA HILLS 3290 2596 78.91% 1717 70.83% 707 29.17%0600 SILVER SPUR 4796 3511 73.21% 2442 73.69% 872 26.31%0633 STONEGATE 1984 1503 75.76% 960 68.57% 440 31.43%0647 SUNDOWN 2361 1789 75.77% 1010 62.85% 597 37.15%0657 MCKELLIPS PARK 1684 924 54.87% 532 63.48% 306 36.52%0660 SUTTON 1931 1383 71.62% 970 73.43% 351 26.57%0666 TERRAVITA 4337 3532 81.44% 2345 71.23% 947 28.77%0698 VIRGINIA 2945 1885 64.01% 1166 67.59% 559 32.41%0722 WESTWORLD 6142 4763 77.55% 3913 84.77% 703 15.23%0726 WHITTON 384 268 69.79% 159 65.70% 83 34.30%0747 YUMA 2134 1451 67.99% 839 63.32% 486 36.68%

TOTALS 167181 119298 71.36% 78946 71.26% 31847 28.74%

ProDOSitlon 490 VotesPercent

Votes Cast

Percent

Ballots CastTOTAL REGISTERED VOTERSTOTAL BALLOTS CAST

167,181119,298

Yes 78,946 71.26% 66.18%VOTER TURNOUTTOTAL REJECTED BALLOTS*

71.36%308

No 31,847 28.74% 26.70% OVER VOTES 98

Total Votes 110,793 UNDER VOTES

*20 Bad Signatures, 118 Returned Late, 170 No Signatures

8,407

RESOLUTION NO. 11323/RESOLUCION NO. 11323 EXHIBIT "B'VDOCUMENTO DE PRUEBA "B"

OFFICIAL CANVASS/EXAMEN OFICIAL DE VOTAS CITY OF SCOTTSDALE/CIUDAD DE SCOTTSDALE NOVEMBER 6, 2018 GENERAL/SPECIAL ELECTION

6 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 ELECCION GENERAL/ESPECIAL REJECTED BALLOTS/BOLETAS RECHAZADAS

Precinct BadSignature

ReturnedLate

NoSignature

Precinct BadSignature

ReturnedLate

NoSignature

0041/BARNES 1 1 2 0506/PINNACLE PEAK 1 3 70060/BRONCO 0 5 0 0507/PINNACLE WEST 1 5 40070/CACTUS GLEN 0 2 2 0519/PUEBLO 1 0 80108/CIELO 0 2 4 0531/REDWING 0 3 30120/COCOPAH 0 0 1 0534/RHODES 0 2 10140/CORONADO 0 1 5 0537/RIO MONTANA 1 3 30167/DC RANCH 0 4 9 0562/SALT RIVER 0 0 00170/DEERVIEW 0 1 1 0570/SAN SIMON 0 0 00171/DEL JOYA 0 2 11 0571/SAN VICTOR 0 1 40179 DESERT HIGHLANDS 0 3 6 0577/SANTO 0 2 40200 DREYFUS 0 2 3 0580/SCOTTSDALE 0 9 50271 GRANITE MOUNTAIN 1 5 1 0584/SENTRY 0 4 20272/GRAYHAWK 1 3 3 0594/SIERRA HILLS 1 3 40319/HUALAPAI 1 2 4 0600/SILVER SPUR 1 4 70320/HUBBELL 0 1 1 0633/STONEGATE 0 0 10361/LAUREL 0 1 2 0647/SUNDOWN 1 3 60375/LOMA VERDES 0 2 2 0413/SUPAI 0 0 20399/MARICOPA 1 2 1 0660/SUTTON 1 1 20410/MCCORMICK RANCH 0 5 11 0666/TERRAVITA 0 2 60411/MCDONALD 0 0 0 0698A/IRGINIA 0 4 30657/MCKELLIPS PARK 1 0 2 0722/WESTWORLD 1 8 40425/MIRADA 0 1 5 0726/WHITTON 0 0 10429/MOHAVE 0 0 4 0747/YUMA 0 0 10442/MUSTANG 2 1 40469/PAIUTE 1 3 00486/PARK MEADOWS 0 2 00489/PEAK VIEW 0 4 10492/PECOS 0 3 30504/PIMA 2 0 20505/PINE VALLEY 0 3 2

Totals 20 118 170

Total Rejected Ballots: 308

TOTAL REGISTERED VOTERS TOTAL BALLOTS CAST VOTER TURNOUT TOTAL REJECTED BALLOTS

167,181119,29871.36%

308