Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed...

8
Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467> Column Author Ken Lynam Agilent Technologies, Inc. Application Note BioPharma Abstract This application note highlights the benefits of using a specifically designed and tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.8 μm column for USP residual solvent testing. Resolution of critical pairs, achieving acceptable signal-to-noise ratios, and pyridine peak shape are key chromatographic criteria for successful USP <467> residual solvent analysis. Example chromatograms for Class 1, 2A, and 2B standards on the new DB-Select 624UI <467> column are shown versus the results observed on less specifically designed and tested columns from other manufactures. Introduction Residual solvent testing of process intermediates, excipients, and formulated drug products provides an important safeguard to assure the safety of pharmaceutical products worldwide. Changes to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) General Chapter <467> Residual Solvents are closely aligned with International Committee on Harmonization (ICH) Q3C Guidelines for Residual Solvents [1,2]. Both groups have taken a toxicity/dosage-based approach to assess the level of risk that the presence of these solvents or organic volatile impurities (OVIs) present to the public. The analysis is typically conducted by static headspace with FID detection using a thick film G43-based stationary phase [3].

Transcript of Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed...

Page 1: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

Residual Solvent Analysis with aSpecifically Designed and TestedAgilent J&W DB-Select 624UI forUSP <467> Column

Author

Ken Lynam

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Application Note

BioPharma

Abstract

This application note highlights the benefits of using a specifically designed and

tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.8 µm

column for USP residual solvent testing. Resolution of critical pairs, achieving

acceptable signal-to-noise ratios, and pyridine peak shape are key chromatographic

criteria for successful USP <467> residual solvent analysis. Example

chromatograms for Class 1, 2A, and 2B standards on the new DB-Select 624UI

<467> column are shown versus the results observed on less specifically designed

and tested columns from other manufactures.

Introduction

Residual solvent testing of process intermediates, excipients, and formulated drugproducts provides an important safeguard to assure the safety of pharmaceuticalproducts worldwide. Changes to United States Pharmacopeia (USP) General Chapter<467> Residual Solvents are closely aligned with International Committee onHarmonization (ICH) Q3C Guidelines for Residual Solvents [1,2]. Both groups havetaken a toxicity/dosage-based approach to assess the level of risk that the presenceof these solvents or organic volatile impurities (OVIs) present to the public. Theanalysis is typically conducted by static headspace with FID detection using a thickfilm G43-based stationary phase [3].

Page 2: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

2

Class 1 solvents are considered particularly hazardous and areto be avoided in pharmaceutical manufacturing. This class ofsolvents consists of known or suspected human carcinogensand environmental hazards. Target limits are in the low singledigit mg/L range with the exception of 1,1,1-trichloroethane,which is considered an environmental hazard. There areseveral chromatographic challenges to be aware of whendemonstrating Class 1 suitability at specified limits. A signal-to-noise minimum of 3:1 is specified for each solventin this class. This can be challenging for carbon tetrachlorideat this level by FID detection. Another focal point to monitor isthe critical pair resolution between benzene and 1,2-dichloroethane.

Class 2 solvents are considered less toxic, but their use is tobe limited. Target limits for this class range from 50 to 3880 mg/L. In the 2A group of solvents, a resolution limit ofnot less than 1.0 is set for the resolution between acetonitrileand dichloromethane. 1,4-Dioxane detector response andresolution from methyl cyclohexane and pyridine peaks arekey chromatographic aspects to track for successful analysisof the 2B group of solvents.

Class 3 solvents are considered less toxic and pose less riskto human health than either Class 1 or Class 2 solvents. Anexposure limit of 50 mg per day or 5,000 mg/L is consideredacceptable when justified for these materials. Some of thesematerials co-elute with other solvents on a G43 phase andmay require follow up analysis by procedure B using a G16-based stationary phase. Example chromatograms and apeak retention table are available on our website for this classof solvents.

In these experiments, an Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI forUSP <467> column was used. The specific design andrigorous inertness testing of this new column help analystsconsistently deliver results that meet or exceed therequirements of USP <467> residual solvent analysis. TheDB-Select 624UI <467> is equivalent to the gaschromatography phase G43, as designated by the USP.

Materials and MethodsAn Agilent Model 7890/5975C GC/MS System equipped witha Multi-Mode Inlet (MMI), an FID detector, an Agilent 7697Aheadspace sampler, and MSD Chem Station E.02.02 softwarewas used for this series of experiments.

Chromatographic conditions for GC/Headspace analysis

Column: Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m × 0.32 mm,1.8 µm (p/n 123-0334UI)

Carrier: Helium, 2.2 mL/min constant flow at 40 °COven: 40 °C (20 min), then 10 °C/min to 240 °C (5 min)Inlet: MMI, 140 °C, 1 µL split 5:1Sample vol: 1.0 mL loopInlet liner: 1 mm straight single taper Ultra Inert liner (p/n 5190-4047)FID: 250 °C, H2 30 mL/min, air 400 mL/min,

N2 constant col + makeup = 30 mL/min

Flow path supplies Vials: 20 mL Flat bottom crimp cap headspace vials

(100 pk, p/n 5182-0837)Vial caps: Headspace crimp cap /high performance septa

(100 pk, 5190-3987)Crimper: 20 mm electronic crimper (p/n 5190-3189)Transfer line: 0.53 mm deactivated fused silica (5 m, p/n 160-2535-5)Fitting: 1/6 to 1/32 inch reducing fitting (p/n 0100-2594)Septum: Non-stick, Bleed and Temperature Optimized

(50 pk, p/n 5183-4757)Inlet liner: 1 mm straight single taper Ultra Inert liner (p/n 5190-4047)Gold seal: Gold plated inlet seal with washer (10/pk, p/n 5190-2209)Ferrules: 0.5 mm id short 85/15 Vespel/graphite (10 pk, p/n 5062-3514)Magnifier: 20x Magnifier loop (p/n 430-1020)

StandardsClass 1: USP 467 Class 1 (p/n 5190-0490)Class 2A: USP 467 Class 2A (p/n 5190-0492)Class 2B: USP 467 Class 2B (p/n 5190-0513)

Page 3: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

3

Figure 1. USP 467 standard preparation procedure A for water-soluble articles.

Standard preparationUSP Class 1, Class 2A, and Class 2B standards were preparedas outlined in Figure 1, in accordance with USP GeneralChapter <467> methodology. Dimethyl sulfoxide (99.5%) waspurchased from Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO 63101 USA. De-ionized water was from an in-laboratory water purificationsystem.

Add 9 mL DMSO to 100 mL vol. flask.

Transfer 1 mL of this solution to 100 mL vol. flask,QS with deionized water and mix well.

Add 1 mL USP467 Class 1 neat solution(p/n 5190-0490)and swirl gently.

QS with deionized water and mix well.

Prepare Class 1 Standard Solution as follows:

Add 1 mL of Class 1 Standard Stock Solutionand 5 mL deionized water to 20 mL headspace vial,

cap, and mix.

Class 1 Class 2A Class 2B(Low)

Prepare Class 2A Standard Solution as follows: Prepare Class 2B Standard Solution as follows:

Transfer 1 mL of this solution to 100 mL vol. flask,QS with deionized water and mix well.

This is the Class 1 Standard Stock Solution.

Add 1 mL USP467 Class 2A neat solution(p/n 5190-0492)

to a 100 mL vol. flask.

QS with deionized water and mix well.This is the Class 2A Standard Stock Solution.

QS with deionized water and mix well.This is the Class 2B Standard Stock Solution.

Add 1 mL of Class 2A Standard Stock Solutionand 5 mL deionized water to 20 mL headspace vial,

cap, and mix.

Add 1 mL USP467 Class 2B (low) neat solution(p/n 5190-0513)

to a 100 mL vol. flask.

Add 1 mL of Class 2B Standard Stock Solutionand 1 mL deionized water to 20 mL headspace vial,

cap, and mix.

Page 4: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

4

Figure 3. Benzene/1,2-dichloroethane critical pair separation and carbon tetrachloride signal-to-noise comparison between Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI forUSP <467> column and G43 phase columns from other manufactures. Note the column from vendor Y failed to meet signal-to-noise criteria for carbontetrachloride.

Results and Discussion

Column performance for Class 1 standardsMeeting the signal-to-noise requirement of not less than 3:1for carbon tetrachloride can be challenging at specific limits ofdetection by FID. Another key chromatographic element tomonitor closely is the separation between benzene and 1,2-dichloroethane. Figure 2 shows a headspace injection of aClass 1 standard on a DB-Select 624UI <467> capillarycolumn. Here, the carbon tetrachloride signal-to-noise value

was 6.85, and the resolution (Rs) between benzene and 1,2-dichoroethane was 1.82.

In Figure 3, expanded views of critical sections of Class 1standard injections are shown to illustrate that G43 columnsfrom other manufacturers are not all created equal. Each ofthese columns was tested on the same instrument under thesame conditions with the same dimension columns. Onevendor’s column did not meet the signal-to-noise acceptancecriteria for carbon tetrachloride.

Figure 2. FID trace of Class1 solvent standard at USP< 467> specified limits on an Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m x 0.32 mm, 1.8 µm column(p/n 123-0334UI).

2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00

20000

30000

38000

1. 1,1-Dichloroethene2. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane3. Carbon tetrachloride4. Benzene5. 1,2-Dichloroethane

1

2

3

4

5

Carbon tetrachloride

S/N=6.85

Rs = 1.82

S/N=6.85

BaselineResolved R = 1.82

Carbon tetrachloride

DB-Select 624UI <467>

S/N=3.78

Carbon tetrachloride

Vendor X G43

R = 1.59

S/N=2.65Below 3.0

Carbon tetrachloride

Vendor Y G43

R= 1.38

Page 5: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

5

Column performance for Class 2A standardsResolution of the acetonitrile/dichloromethane critical pair isspecified to be no less than 1.0. Figure 4 shows a resolutionof 2.13 for this critical pair on the DB-Select 624UI <467>column. Another key chromatographic element to track in theClass 2A standard is the response of 1,4 dioxane at 380 mg/Land its resolution from methyl cyclohexane, which has ahigher permissible limit of 3,880 mg/L.

Figure 5 compares the resolution of the acetonitrile/dichloromethane critical pair observed on the DB-Select624UI <467> column with the G43 column offerings from 2other vendors. Each of these columns was tested on thesame instrument under the same conditions with the samedimension columns.

1. Methanol2. Acetonitrile3. Dichloromethane4. trans-1,2-Dichloroethane5. cis-1,2-Dichloroethane6. Tetrahydrofuran7. Cylcohexane8. Methylcyclohexane9. 1,4-Dioxane10. Toluene11. Chlorobenzene12. Ethylbenzene13. m/p-Xylene14. 0-Xylene

1

2-4

6

7

11

5

9

8

1210 13

14

2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00

100000

1000000

2000000

2900000Rs = 2.13

8

9

16.00 18.00

Rs = 4.232

3

5.55.04.5

Figure 4. FID trace of Class 2A solvent standard at USP 467 specified limits on an Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.8 µm column(p/n 123-0334UI).

Page 6: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

6

Column performance for Class 2B standards Pyridine peak shape or degree of tailing is an importantperformance parameter to monitor in the Class 2 B standardsolution. In Figure 6, the USP tailing value for pyridine was 1.3on the DB-Select 624UI <467> column.

Rs = 2.13 Rs = 2.02 Rs = 1.20

DB-Select 624UI <467> Vendor X G43 Vendor Y G43

2

3

3.50 4.00 4.50

2

3

3.50 4.00 4.50

2

3

5.55.04.5

Figure 5. Acetonitrile/dichloromethane critical pair separation comparison between the Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467> column and G43 columnsfrom other manufactures.

1. Hexane2. Nitromethane3. Chloroform4. 1,2-Dimethoxyethane5. Trichloroethylene6. Pyridine7. 2-Hexanone8. Tetralin

6

8

1

2

5

34

7

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 Time

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

220000

240000

260000

280000

300000

320000

340000

Res

pons

e

Pyridine

USP Tailing = 1.3

16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00

Figure 6. FID trace of Class 2B solvent standard at USP <467> specified limits on an Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467>, 30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.8 µm column (p/n 123-0334UI).

Page 7: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

7

Figure 7 compares the USP tailing results for pyridine seen onthe Agilent column with the results obtained on 2 G43columns from other vendors. Each of these columns wastested on the same instrument under the same conditionswith the same dimension columns. Note that no pyridine wasdetected at the 200 mg/L level on Vendor P’s column.

Conclusions

The Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467> columndemonstrates excellent chromatographic performance for theClass 1, Class 2A, and Class 2B at USP <467> specified limits.Critical pairs were resolved, and signal-to-noise valuesgreater than 6 were observed for carbon tetrachloride at thespecified limit. The USP tailing factor for basic pyridine was1.3, significantly better than the other G43 phases testedunder the same conditions.

Indications are that this column delivers superior performancein comparison to less specifically designed and tested G43phases. Inertness testing makes the difference, and onceagain, innovations from Agilent Technologies help analystsmeet their continuing needs for good separations.

References

1. United States Pharmacopeia. USP 34-NF29, GeneralChapter USP <467> Residual Solvents. USP,Pharmacopeia Convention Inc., Rockville MD, USA(12/2011).

2. International Conference on Harmonization. Impurities:Guideline for Residual Solvents, Q3C(R5). ICH ofTechnical Requirements for Registration ofPharmaceuticals for Human Use, Current Step 4 Version(2/2011).

3. Roger L. Firor. Analysis of USP <467> Residual Solventswith Improved Repeatability Using the Agilent 7697AHeadspace Sampler. Agilent Technologies, Inc.,Publication number 5990-7625EN (2011).

For More Information

These data represent typical results. For more information onour products and services, visit our Web site atwww.agilent.com/chem/624UI.

DB-Select 624UI <467> Vendor X G43 Vendor Y G43

Pyridine

USP Tailing = 1.3

16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 20.00

Pyridine

18.00 20.00 22.00

USP Tailing = 2.5

Pyridine

20.00 21.50 23.00 24.50

USP Tailing = ND

Figure 7. Pyridine peak shape comparison at 200 mg/L between the Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for USP <467> column and G43 columns from othermanufactures.

Page 8: Residual Solvent Analysis with a Specifically Designed …cn.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-0616EN.pdf · Specifically Designed and Tested Agilent J&W DB-Select 624UI for

www.agilent.com/chem

Agilent shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequentialdamages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material.

Information, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to changewithout notice.

© Agilent Technologies, Inc., 2012Printed in the USAJune 7, 20125991-0616EN