Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

47
1 CAS Emerging Issues Seminar April 15, 2002 Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes Dan Thomas, PricewaterhouseCoopers Claire Louis, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Transcript of Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

Page 1: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

1

CAS Emerging Issues Seminar

April 15, 2002

Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes

Dan Thomas, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Claire Louis, PricewaterhouseCoopers

Page 2: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

2

Outline

• Individual company reserve estimate methodology

• Ongoing issues

Page 3: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

3

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

• Potential actuarial methods

• Methods used

• Underwriting methodology with assumptions

• Specific line of business considerations

Page 4: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

4

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Potential Actuarial Methods

• CAT development factors

– Actual development history

– Problems applying to 9/11 losses

• Market share allocation

Page 5: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

5

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Methods Used

• Insurers and reinsurers initially used exposure-based loss

estimation method

• Loss estimation generally directed by underwriting with

the assistance of claims and actuarial

• Companies did not anticipate a 9/11-type loss event

• Company exposure identification and management process

reflected this: Most companies did not have such a process

in place prior to 9/11.

Page 6: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

6

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Intelligence gathering

• Intelligence vetting

• Exposure investigation

• Exposure estimation

• Loss reporting and analysis

• Loss reserving

Page 7: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

7

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Intelligence gathering – identifying the exposure

– Market sources

– Underwriting records

– Knowledge of ceding company book of business, underwriting practices and underlying insured operations

– Predictive models

– Sufficiently iterative

Page 8: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

8

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Intelligence vetting – assessing the exposure information

– Source reliability

– System data integrity

– Human error

– Ceding company advices

Page 9: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

9

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Exposure identification

– Primary exposure areas

– Product lines

– Contract types

– Detailed contract or policy analysis

– Contract wordings

Page 10: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

10

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Exposure estimation

– Industry loss estimates

– Market share

– Large measure of uncertainty regarding extent of exposure

– Reassess as new market information is received

Page 11: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

11

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Loss reporting and analysis

– Expert retention

– Industry steering committees

– Coordinating counsel

– Contract terms and conditions

– Discrepancies in insurer policy and reinsurance contract terms and conditions

• Occurrence

• Terrorism risk exclusion (some non-U.S. reinsurers)

Page 12: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

12

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Underwriting Methodology with Assumptions

• Loss reserving

– General philosophy

– Provisions for uncertainty: portfolio versus transaction-based – IBNER (ACRs) v. bulk v. IBNR

– LAE

– Volatility of ceding company or insured loss estimates

– Intra-company consistency in reserving approach

Page 13: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

13

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Property coverages

– Business interruption

– Extra expense

Page 14: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

14

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption

– Background

– Threshold requirements

• Loss arising from a covered peril

– Causation

– Lost profits

• Interruption of insured’s business operations

– “Necessary suspension of operations”: Sufficient level of interruption

– Physical damage may not be required for coverage to attach

Page 15: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

15

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption

– Coverage issues

• Replacement structure different from original

structure

• Cost of rebuilding

• Period of restoration or recovery

– Time to restore versus time to improve

– Post-restoration period losses

– Projected profits during period of restoration

Page 16: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

16

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption

Pre-9/11 Post-9/11

Airlines Poor; losses expected for

3Q and for entire 2001;

drop in business travel;

GDP decline and traffic

highly correlated; severe

economic hardship

Grim; 40-50% decline in

revenue for remainder of

the year and 15-20% drop

for first half of 2002.

Lodging Poor; 7-9% decline

through August 2001;

expect continued

volatility

Grim; 20-40% short-term

decline due to travel

restrictions, fear to travel,

worsening of the general

U.S. economy; rising fuel

costs

Page 17: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

17

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption - Civil or military authority coverage

– Impairment of access to insured premises

– Physical loss or damage to property other than the

insured premises

– Caused by or results from covered peril

– Some policies eliminate physical damage requirement

– Some policies exclude civil or military authority

coverage

– Sub-limits

Page 18: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

18

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption - Civil or military authority coverage

– Claims presented by airlines, airports, airport

concessions, entertainment-related organizations,

hotels, travel and tour companies, and transportation

authorities (NY/NJ Port Authority)

– Ingress-egress

Page 19: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

19

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Business Interruption - other coverages

– Contingent business interruption

Page 20: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

20

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Extra Expense

– Necessary expenses that exceed normal operating costs

to continue or minimize suspension of business

operations

• Incurred during period of restoration

• Physical loss or damage required

• Sub-limits

Page 21: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

21

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Extra Expense - Categories

– Expenses incurred when insured shifts operation to

other pre-existing locations

– Cost of renting temporary office space

– Terror prevention expenses; new WTC

– Advertising expenses: Cost of changing Web site, sales

literature, and marketing

– Clean-up costs

Page 22: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

22

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Workers’ Compensation

– Background / definitions

– Post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)

• Delayed response to stressor event: At least one

month

– Occupational disease

Page 23: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

23

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Worker’s Compensation - PTSD

– Five days post-event: 44% of Americans reported substantial stress (Rand Institute)

– Early October 2001: 25% of Americans reported being worried or having difficulty sleeping (Pew Research Center)

– Some project a 20% rate of PTSD in work force within 1,000 feet of WTC at time of attack

– Risks of PTSD rise with age and history of trauma, decline with higher educational level and higher quality social and economic supports

Page 24: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

24

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Worker’s Compensation - PTSD

– Statutes or case law for many states excludes

compensation for purely mental injury (mental-mental)

– In most states, less than 1% of total claims are purely

mental (Worker’s Compensation Research Institute)

– Many states require accompanying physical injury

(physical-mental)

– New York does not require physical injury

Page 25: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

25

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Worker’s Compensation - PTSD

– Other PTSD compensation standards:

• Unusual and extraordinary stress

• Sudden, unexpected, extraordinary event

• Proximity to event

• Work conditions caused the injury

– Employers offering psychological counseling

– Few PTSD claims reported to insurers to date

• Reporting lag not unexpected given nature of PTSD (delayed response to stressor event)

Page 26: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

26

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Worker’s compensation – occupational disease

– Background / definitions

• NYS Worker’s Compensation Law

– 29 specific illnesses if contracted by persons

working with certain toxic substances, including

silicosis and other dust diseases, asbestosis,

anthrax, lead, mercury and radium poisoning

Page 27: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

27

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Worker’s compensation – occupational disease

– Exposure to asbestos and other airborne pollutants from

WTC recovery and clean-up

– Health complaints reported by 4,000 emergency

response personnel working on WTC clean-up

– Respiratory ailments, neurological problems, cancer

– One-year statute of limitations begins when employee

is disabled and begins to lose wages

– Potentially long latency period and reporting lag

Page 28: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

28

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Liability – potential coverages impacted

– General liability

• Airlines or airports for negligent security

• Building owners for negligent security and fire

protection systems

– Professional liability – architects and engineers

• Negligent building design

Page 29: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

29

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Liability

– Industry losses difficult to estimate

– Limitation of Silverstein and airline liability for

damages under federal Air Safety and System

Stabilization Act

– Probability of subrogation

– Victims’ Compensation Fund

– Single venue for all lawsuits

Page 30: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

30

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Disability

– Employers required to provide under NYS law

– Provides income protection for non-employment-

related injuries or sicknesses

– Does not pay for cost of medical care

– Manhattan workers, visitors, general public

– Mental and nerve-related claims, including PTSD

– Lung ailments, cancers

– Latency period

Page 31: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

31

Individual Company Reserve Estimate Methodology

Specific Line of Business Considerations

• Health

– Non-work-related injuries

– Manhattan residents: Many children

– Manhattan visitors

– “WTC cough”, chronic sinus infections, acute lung

trauma

Page 32: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

32

Ongoing Issues

• Summary of paid / incurred to date

• Company reserve revisions

• Potential WTC reserving issues

• Future terrorism-related reserving issues

• 9/11 Insurance and non-insurance dispute update

• Reserving “checklist”

Page 33: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

33

Ongoing Issues

Summary of paid / incurred to date

• Types of payments

• Gross / net gap

Company reserve revisions

• Number of revisions

• Reasons for revisions

Page 34: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

34

Ongoing Issues

• Potential WTC reserving issues

– Property

• Business Interruption

– Worker’s compensation / disability / health

• PTSD

• Respiratory and neurological ailments; cancers

– Liability

• General, products

Page 35: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

35

Ongoing Issues

• Future terrorism-related reserving issues

– U.S. and global risks

– Chemical, biological, radiological attacks

• Could affect large numbers of people

• Potentially affected coverages

– Property / business interruption

– Worker’s compensation

– General liability, professional liability, products

liability

» Could give rise to mass tort and class actions

Page 36: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

36

Ongoing Issues

• Insurance response to terrorism exposures

– Shut-down from a bio-hoax

• Business interruption

– Anthrax clean-up

• Property

– Pollution or contamination exclusion

– Bio-attack in workplace

• Workers’ compensation

Page 37: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

37

Ongoing Issues

• Insurance response to terrorism exposures – Cont’d.

– Anthrax testing; cost of precautionary antibiotics

related to suspected anthrax exposure

• Worker’s compensation

– Protection of employees and customers against

potential terrorist attacks

• To date, lawsuits filed against U.S. Postal Service,

physician, and hospital

• General liability

– Pollution exclusion

Page 38: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

38

Ongoing Issues

• 9/11 Insurance Dispute Update

– Silverstein

• Total of 19 insurers, Swiss Re and others

• Policies did not reference Willis policy: Source of dispute on number of occurrences

• 3rd September 2002 trial date

– Silverstein: ACE, XL

• Referenced Willis policy: one occurrence, not two

• Defines occurrence as “all losses or damages that are attributable directly or indirectly to one cause or to one series of similar causes”

• Settled based on one occurrence

Page 39: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

39

Ongoing Issues

• 9/11 Insurance Dispute Update – Cont’d.

– Westfield

• Lawsuit with Zurich dismissed

• Dispute will be decided through arbitration

• Zurich policy supplements Silverstein cover

– Port Authority

• No lawsuit; ongoing negotiations with insurers

• Primary issue is number of occurrences

Page 40: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

40

Ongoing Issues

• 9/11 Insurance Dispute Update – Cont’d.

– Reinsurers are challenging ceding company property &

business interruption claim payments, resulting in

delays in reinsurer payments

– Increase in reinsurer/ceding company disputes

• “Follow the fortunes” does not always mean “follow

the settlement”

Page 41: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

41

Ongoing Issues

• Non-Insurance Dispute-Related Issues

– 90-day deadline to give notice of claim; some notices

received after 90 days may be accepted

– One year deadline to file suit

– 1,300 people have given notice may sue NYC for $7.8

billion for fear of cancer and ailments related to WTC

cleanup and recovery

– Under NYS law, fire fighters not entitled to worker’s

compensation

Page 42: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

42

Ongoing Issues

• Non-Insurance Dispute-Related Issues – Cont’d.

– Property owners near WTC have also given notice they

may file suit against NYC

– As of 1/2002 (following expiration of 90-day deadline),

the Port Authority had received 87 notices of claim

– Suit filed on behalf of relatives of six airline passengers

who died on 9/11: American Airlines, United Airlines,

security firms at Logan, Newark, and Portland, ME,

airports

Page 43: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

43

Ongoing Issues

• Reserving “checklist”

– Liability estimation

– Solvency considerations

– Ongoing business considerations

Page 44: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

44

Ongoing Issues

Checklist – Liability Estimation

• Statement of Opinion considerations

– Reinsurance Collectibility

– Applicability of financial reinsurance

– Impact on RBC or IRIS tests

– Type of opinion

– Changes in reserving methods and assumptions

– List of major risk factors

– Potential for material adverse deviation

– Materiality

Page 45: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

45

Ongoing Issues

Checklist – Liability Estimation

• Other considerations

– Booked reserve issues

– Personnel and methods used

– Uncollectible reinsurance

– Loss versus LAE

– Procedural changes in company

Page 46: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

46

Ongoing Issues

Checklist -- Solvency Considerations

• Cash flow

• Asset management

• Present to the outside world

• Reserve range uncertainty

Page 47: Reserving for Unusual Catastrophes 4 2002

47

Ongoing Issues

Checklist -- Ongoing Business Considerations

• Reinsurance scenarios

• Policy and underwriting changes

• Changes in direction of company