Research Report Copyright UCTgsblibrary.uct.ac.za/ResearchReports/2014/Khojane.pdf · I have not...
Transcript of Research Report Copyright UCTgsblibrary.uct.ac.za/ResearchReports/2014/Khojane.pdf · I have not...
Copyright UCT
Applications of the Stokvel Model for Social Service Enterprises in Urban
Townships
Research Report
presented to
The Graduate School of Business
University of Cape Town
In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the
Masters of Business Administration Degree
by
Nokwethu Khojane December 2014
Supervised by
Dr. Warren Nilsson
Copyright UCT
ii
Abstract
Informal, survivalist businesses operating in South African urban townships struggle
to subsist amidst a number of challenges, including poor access to finance. These
challenges are compounded for businesses servicing the poor. This research examines
the existing mechanisms for financial inclusion and capacity building available to
early childhood development centre (ECD) enterprises as an example of such
businesses. Qualitative research was conducted with ECD owners and operators, and
three others working in the field of study. We find that these businesses are a hybrid
model, termed Social Service Enterprises (SSEs), due to their focus on social good
over profits. However, in order to ensure that this focus is met, enterprises require
access to financial resources. We find further that though existing methods available
have their drawbacks in providing SSE owners with access to affordable credit, all
were familiar with stokvels, an informal savings mechanism that has been used in
South Africa for more than a hundred years. The study investigates whether the
stokvel model of pooling resources can be transferred from the individual to the
business level. We find that this model is suited to businesses that have a social
orientation, though strict criteria need to be in place for the optimal functioning of the
group.
Keywords: Stokvel, ECD, Social Service Enterprise, financial mechanisms
Copyright UCT
iii
Plagiarism Declaration
I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another’s work and pretend that
it is one’s own.
I have used a recognised convention for citation and referencing. Each significant
contribution and quotation from the works of other people has been attributed, cited
and referenced.
I certify that this submission is all my own work.
I have not allowed and will not allow anyone to copy this Research Report with the
intention of passing it off as his or her own work.
_______________________________
Nokwethu Khojane
TMBNOK002
8 December 2014
Copyright UCT
iv
Table of Contents
Abstract .................................................................................................................................. ii
Plagiarism Declaration ................................................................................................... iii
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iv
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... vi
List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... vii
List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vii
List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vii
Section 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Purpose of the study ........................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Significance of the study ................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Context of the study ......................................................................................................... 9
1.3.1 The environment ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.3.2 Traditional financing and collaboration models ..................................................... 12
1.3 Research problem ..........................................................................................................13 1.4 Delimitations of the study ...........................................................................................14 1.5 Assumptions .....................................................................................................................15
Section 2: Literature Review .................................................................................... 16 2.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................16
2.1.1 Informal enterprise ............................................................................................................. 16 2.1.2 ECD Centres ............................................................................................................................ 18
2.2 Financing and collaboration models .......................................................................19 2.2.1 Microfinance .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Cooperatives .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.3 Stokvels .................................................................................................................................... 23
2.3 Benefits of cooperation ................................................................................................25 2.4 Conclusion .........................................................................................................................26
Section 3: Research Methodology ........................................................................... 29 3.1 Research approach and strategy ...............................................................................29 3.2 Research design ..............................................................................................................30 3.3 Population and sample ................................................................................................31
Population .............................................................................................................................................. 31 Sample ..................................................................................................................................................... 31
3.4 The research instrument ............................................................................................32 3.5 Data collection ................................................................................................................33 3.6 Data analysis ...................................................................................................................33 3.7 Limitations .......................................................................................................................34 3.8 Validity and reliability .................................................................................................34 3.9 Informed consent and research ethics...................................................................35
Section 4: Findings ....................................................................................................... 36 4.1 The nature of crèches as organisations ..................................................................37
4.1.1 Owners/principals set the tone for the crèche ........................................................ 37 4.1.2 Strong social capital ............................................................................................................ 38 4.1.3 Crèches not viewed as commercial enterprises ...................................................... 40
Copyright UCT
v
4.1.4 Crèches as a source of pride for owners .................................................................... 41 4.1.5 Low levels of education and training ........................................................................... 42 4.1.6 Lack of infrastructure......................................................................................................... 43 4.1.7 Onerous legislative requirements ................................................................................. 43
4.2 Findings relating to HOW a stokvel might work .................................................44 4.2.1 Groups must have autonomy .......................................................................................... 45 4.2.2 Group members must agree on the purpose of the stokvel ............................... 45 4.2.3 Financial benefit for members ....................................................................................... 46 4.2.4 Stringent oversight .............................................................................................................. 46 4.2.5 Must be about more than just money .......................................................................... 47 4.2.6 High levels of trust amongst members ....................................................................... 48 4.2.7 Must be easy to administer .............................................................................................. 49
Section 5: Discussion ................................................................................................... 51
Section 6: Conclusions ................................................................................................ 62
Section 7: References .................................................................................................. 64
Section 8: Appendices ................................................................................................. 70 Appendix 1 Schedule of interviews and observations .............................................70 Appendix 2 Semi-structured interview questions .....................................................71 Appendix 3 Focus group discussion questions ...........................................................72
Copyright UCT
vi
Acknowledgements
It’s hard to believe that I have arrived at the end of my MBA journey. It has been a
year of immense challenges, debilitating lows and exhilarating highs.
I can’t see how I could have hoped to make it through without the unwavering support
of my life partner, Thabo, and our children Luyanda and Khahliso. They have given
me the space to follow my passion, even though it has meant missed dinners,
bedtimes and even birthday presents that arrived well past their intended dates.
I would not have been able to be away from my family had it not been for Kate and
Nopi, who kept the home and school fires burning. Thanks to their diligence, I was
able to focus on my studies knowing that my kids were in capable and caring hands.
I will forever be amazed by and grateful for my sister Ayanda’s selflessness when she
came down to Cape Town during her maternity leave to hold things together in my
home when the wheels really fell off.
I am indebted to Diana and Lauren, my MBA sisters, who laughed along with me (or
helped me to find the humour) when I thought I was losing my mind. They listened to
every complaint, shared every triumph, read every draft and acted as permanent
sounding boards. I am forever grateful that our paths crossed.
This report would not have been possible had Thobeka and Zanele not opened their
hearts, businesses and networks to me. I’m thankful to them for allowing me to stand
alongside them and learn from the heroic work that they are doing.
Lastly, to my supervisor Warren, whose gentle guidance and genuine openness to the
world shifted my perspective so many times and made this journey more enriching
and rewarding than I’d ever hoped – thank you.
It really does take a village.
Copyright UCT
vii
List of Abbreviations
DSD Department of Social Development
ECD Early Childhood Development
LSM Living Standards Measure
MDG Millennium Development Goal
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
ROSCA Rotating Savings and Credit Association
SA South Africa
SSE Social Service Enterprise
UN United Nations
List of Tables
Table 1: Employment rates by sector in informal businesses ...................................... 17
Table 2: Summary of critical success and failure factors of financing models ........... 27
Table 3: List of study organisations ............................................................................. 32
Table 4: Details of study participants .......................................................................... 36
Table 5: Summary of the characteristics of the crèche organisation ........................... 44
Table 6: Comparing the characteristics of a crèche to those of financing models ...... 59
List of Figures
Figure 1: Map of study area ......................................................................................................... 15
Figure 2: The transference of knowledge and energy in crèches ...................................... 38
Figure 3: Critical components of a crèche stokvel ................................................................ 50
Copyright UCT
8
Section 1: Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the study
The study investigates how the stokvel model might be applied to Social Service
Enterprises (SSEs), a term coined by the researcher to refer to a type of informal,
survivalist business operating in low-income areas in South Africa. These businesses
are differentiated from similar entities in that they provide social services to the
communities they serve. The study examines existing ways that SSEs access finance
and provide social services, and looks at how the stokvel model can be leveraged to
pool resources and build capacity amongst several such organisations in urban
townships.
1.2 Significance of the study
Individuals in low-income communities have, for generations, used group savings and
credit extension schemes to pool resources, mitigate risks and provide social safety
nets. In South Africa, these group savings schemes are commonly referred to as
‘stokvels’. According to the latest research by African Response Research (see Slade,
2014), there are 421,000 stokvel groups with an estimated 8.6 million members in
South Africa.
Informal, survivalist businesses that operate in townships often struggle to eke out
incomes in difficult environments, which are characterised by poor access to finance,
poor infrastructure, little institutional support and lack of skills. These exigencies are
significantly compounded for enterprises that view themselves as providing a service
to their communities. This is particularly evident in the Early Childhood Development
(ECD) industry, where crèche owners face the additional struggle of having
‘customers’ who often are too poor to pay for the services that they receive, even
though they access them.
Yet, operating within the same adverse environment and faced with the same
challenges, stokvels have flourished, providing support and access to finance for their
members. This study aims to investigate whether extending the stokvel model of
Copyright UCT
9
pooling resources, both financial and social, from individuals to informal, survivalist
businesses might help negate the difficulties these SSEs experience, and indeed,
whether the model is transferrable at all.
The outcomes of this research may be of particular interest to owners of informal,
survivalist businesses wanting to stabilise and/or grow their operations; to
government agencies tasked with formulating effective policies and regulatory
frameworks to strengthen the capacity of informal businesses, particularly those in the
ECD field, and to organisations that supply or wish to supply goods and services to
informal businesses.
1.3 Context of the study
1.3.1 The environment
Stokvels
Stokvels are a group savings and credit extension vehicle used by individuals in low-
income communities to access financing and credit which formal institutions do not
provide them with (Mashigo & Schoeman, 2012). This form of group savings scheme
is prevalent in predominately poor and emerging economies around the world where
they are commonly referred to as ROSCAs – rotating savings and credit associations
(Verhoef, 2001a).
Stokvels have proven to be an effective savings and credit mechanism for individuals
in low-income communities who have low participation rates in the formal financial
sector.
According to research carried out by Old Mutual in 2014, stokvels have a current
market value of approximately R45.1 billion (Old Mutual, 2014). Members of a
stokvel are typically individuals from black communities who fall within the Living
Standards Measure (LSM) 5 to 8 grouping and who primarily utilise the funds for
burials, savings and groceries (Slade, 2014). In recent years, there has been a steadily
growing number of investment stokvels, where members pool their resources to invest
in start-up businesses, unit trusts and the stock market (Verhoef, 2001b). Investment
stokvels are more prevalent within affluent groups of individuals who fall within
LSM 8-10.
Copyright UCT
10
Despite stokvels charging high interest rates, subjecting their members to onerous
rules of conduct and imposing heavy fines for non-compliance, they have
exceptionally high adherence rates as well as negligible rates of defaults on payments
(Naong, 2009).
There is an abundance of literature that looks at the reasons for the effectiveness of
stokvels as a savings mechanism for poor individuals. Many owners and operators of
informal, survivalist businesses are themselves likely to be part of a stokvel and
familiar with the way they work.
Informal, survivalist business
Informal, survivalist businesses form a significant part of the South African economy,
generating up to 20% of GDP (Ligthelm, 2005) and providing employment to 45% of
workers (Muller & Posel, 2004). This is particularly significant given the country’s
high rate of unemployment.
These businesses operate in fragmented environments, characterised by limited access
to financing, little to no institutional support, and a dearth of skills. They are
unregulated and generate varying levels of income that in many instances barely
cover the survival needs of the owners and their families. Examples of such informal
businesses include crèches, informal traders, spaza shops, traditional healers,
hairdressing salons and street vendors.
Due to the hostility of the environment and the lack of coordination and support, these
businesses often have high operational costs and low margins, making survival
difficult. The pooling of resources, sharing of knowledge and widening of networks
has the potential to assist these businesses in achieving scale, which is currently not
possible in the extant isolationist environment.
Social service enterprise
Not all informal, survivalist businesses that operate in urban townships are purely
commercial enterprises. Certain businesses within this ambit, such as crèches,
traditional healers and churches, also provide crucial social services to their
communities. Though these organisations are typically privately-owned and charge
fees for their services, they also have an element of ‘helping’ the community, which
Copyright UCT
11
extends far beyond that which their customers pay. Their duality, both in terms of the
private income that they generate and the social net that they provide, makes them key
contributors to the financial and social wellbeing of the communities in which they
operate.
For the purposes of this study, these informal, survivalist businesses with a social
outlook will be referred to as Social Service Enterprises (SSEs). In order to examine
how SSEs might use the stokvel model to build capacity, this study will focus on
ECD Centres, commonly referred to as crèches. Crèches seem to typify SSEs, in that
they clearly provide services for which they charge, namely childcare and education.
At the same time, many crèches report the stated goal of ensuring the wellbeing of
children within their communities, which often includes those children whose parents
or guardians are unable to afford the fees charged. In this way, crèches function to
perform a societal role.
The ECD crèche environment
Crèches that operate in low-income communities are faced with seemingly
insurmountable issues. They operate in communities faced with high unemployment,
poverty and crumbling or non-existent infrastructure. Children tend to come from
single parent households that are dependent on government grants; therefore the
crèches are not able to charge high fees for their services (September, 2009).
Parents in these communities generally work very long hours, with crèche owners
reporting children being dropped off from 5am, and often being picked up as late as
7pm. Many parents and guardians do not seem to appreciate the value nor see the
need for educating very young children; they are therefore uninvolved in the early-
stage education of their children (UNICEF, 2005).
Most crèches in urban townships are run out of backyard dwellings, shacks and
unsafe buildings. Very few have adequate sanitation or access to electricity. Although
the Department of Social Development pays subsidies for children who attend
registered crèches, few centres are able to meet the onerous requirements for
registration. There is a well-known shortage of crèches, with the result that registered
facilities cater for significantly more children than what they are officially permitted
to enrol. This results in facilities that are significantly overcrowded. Due to the sheer
Copyright UCT
12
number of children being serviced, most crèches face severe shortages of toys, books,
mattresses, learning materials and space.
There is also a shortage of trained teachers. As a result, crèches operate more as
babysitting facilities, rather than places of learning and development (September,
2009). Crèches however tend to employ more staff on average than any other
informal businesses (Skinner, 2006) and they provide services to many households.
Finding appropriate financing and organising mechanisms that will allow for these
facilities to function at a better level will have a wide-reaching and positive impact.
1.3.2 Traditional financing and collaboration models
Cooperatives
In order to mitigate the failures of the market system in supporting informal,
survivalist businesses, the South African government has enacted various policies to
encourage and support the creation of cooperatives. Cooperatives differ from
‘traditional’ businesses in that they are run for the benefit of their members, in a
collective, inclusive and democratic manner (Urban-Econ Development Economists,
2009). They are intended to increase the coordination between informal, survivalist
organisations in order to give them better access to markets by increasing their
bargaining power, leveraging economies of scale and the sharing of business risk.
By supporting the entrepreneurial efforts of cooperatives, the government hopes to
meet its objectives of decreasing unemployment, poverty alleviation and the reduction
of inequality in the poorest of communities. According to the Department of Trade
and Industry, there were 43,062 registered cooperatives in 2009 (Department of Trade
and Industry, 2012).
The performance of cooperatives has, however, failed to deliver on expectations, with
many organisations struggling to establish viable businesses. They have been ill-
prepared to deal with hostile competition from incumbent businesses. Many have
incurred losses due to poor product pricing and have faced cash-flow challenges
which have made it difficult to service debt and to meet other financial obligations
(Department of Trade and Industry, 2012). A study carried out by Urban-Econ
Development Economists (2009) found that there is limited collaboration and trust
Copyright UCT
13
amongst cooperatives, which means that lessons and experiences are not shared and
networks are not fully leveraged; this further reduces the chances of success.
Microfinance
The need to provide affordable financial services to the poor has been highlighted as
being key to reaching the Millennium Developmental Goals (United Nations, 2014).
To this end, the provision of small loans, known as microfinance, to low-income
individuals and small and/or informal businesses has grown exponentially, driven in
part by the success of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh (Neverson, 2013). In South
Africa, financial inclusion has been prioritised as a national policy objective (Bank
Seta, 2013), in the hopes of driving policy that supports the development of financial
products aimed at the poor and unbanked.
However, in recent years, the efficacy and sustainability of microfinance in improving
the plight of small and/or informal businesses and poor households has been called
into question. According to Baumann (2004), microfinance institutions have not fared
well in delivering affordable credit to small and/or informal businesses or to the poor.
The sector lacks experience and expertise in effective policy creation, as well as
industry knowledge (Coetzee, 2005). Often the size of loans granted did not
adequately take into account the holistic ability of the borrower to repay, resulting in
over-indebtedness and high default rates (Hietalahti & Linden, 2006).
The collapse of African Bank and the shutting down of numerous micro-lending
institutions and bank subsidiaries, points to a model that has not only failed in
achieving its aims; but one that has exacerbated the condition of the poor.
1.3 Research problem
There have been numerous attempts at finding effective mechanisms for financing
and organising informal, survivalist businesses that will enable these entities to grow
into stable ventures. Cooperatives and microfinance are two such mechanisms. Both
draw on mainstream economic theory, but when practically applied, both have proven
inadequate to provide solutions that result in sustained development and growth in the
informal sector. This is in direct contrast to stokvels, which have been used
Copyright UCT
14
effectively by poor communities to access financing and support from their local
networks.
This study will therefore explore ways in which the success factors of the stokvel
model can be replicated in informal, survivalist businesses of a particular type,
namely crèches in urban townships. It will look at how social capital might be
galvanised by applying the lessons learned from organising and running stokvels, and
whether the pooling of resources, as a function of the stokvel, can create scale.
1.4 Delimitations of the study
This exploratory study will be based on five crèches in the urban township of
Khayelitsha.
Established in 1983, Khayelitsha is a relatively new township that is located
approximately 25km from the City of Cape Town, on the Cape Flats. It has a
population of between 391,750 and 406,779 inhabitants. As is typical of townships in
South Africa, Khayelitsha has a high unemployment rate, poor infrastructure
provisions and experiences high levels of crime.
Township SSEs and crèches, in particular, operate in environments that contain all of
the adverse elements that plague informal, survivalist businesses as detailed above.
The industry is highly fragmented; there are high levels of competition, while there is
a shortage of skilled ECD practitioners. This makes it a suitable area in which to
explore the possibilities of implementing a stokvel model in informal social service
businesses.
Copyright UCT
15
Figure 1: Map of study area. Adapted from City of Cape Town (2013)
1.5 Assumptions
In carrying out this study, the researcher assumes that all intended participants will
have the necessary knowledge and skills to enable them to make meaningful
contributions to the research. It is further assumed that the information given during
observations, interviews and focus groups shall be reflective of the participant’s true
opinions, insights and perspectives.
Copyright UCT
16
Section 2: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction
The focus of this review is to explore literature regarding the key success factors and
the drawbacks of mechanisms and models used to grant access to finance, extend
credit and resource aggregation for informal businesses and poor communities. It
looks at informal savings groups (stokvels), cooperatives and microfinance initiatives.
The review begins by first defining the informal enterprise in which these
mechanisms and models operate and explores an understanding of the ECD
environment.
2.1.1 Informal enterprise
Ligthelm (2005) defined the informal sector as unrecorded commercial activity that
contributed to a country’s GDP. Godfrey (2013) stated further that economic
activities conducted within this sector were unregulated and unregistered.
The informal sector was found to provide employment to more than half of the adult
population in Africa (Irving, 2005). In South Africa, specifically, the informal sector
was estimated to provide employment to between 22% and 30% of the working
population (Valodia, 2013; Yu, 2012). Indeed, the informal sector has been deemed
by many to form an integral part of low-income economies. Godfrey (2013) asserted
that the informal sector not only met the needs of the poor, but that it imbued workers
with a sense of purpose and “social meaning”.
Businesses in the informal sector remain spread across a few industries, mainly retail
and personal services. Employment absorption figures vary across the different
sectors. The table below outlines sectors where business owners employ personnel in
addition to themselves.
Copyright UCT
17
Table 1: Employment rates by sector in informal businesses
Employment Rates by Sector: Informal business in townships
Sector Percentage
Hairdressers
Craft
Traditional medicine
Apparel
Spaza shops
Shebeens
Construction
Crèches
Metal work
26.8
27.5
38.8
42.7
74.2
75.6
79.5
82.1
88.4
Adapted from Skinner (2006)
As important as the informal sector might be, it has been determined that most people
who participated in it were not doing so to exploit identified market opportunities.
Rather, they had entered it out of necessity and in order to escape poverty (Godfrey,
2013; Ligthelm, 2006; Rogerson, 1996) due to lack of formal employment
opportunities. Skinner (2006) found that there was a high correlation between being
poor and being part of the informal economy.
Most businesses operating in the informal sector were discovered to be survivalist in
nature in that they generated incomes that barely supported their owners (Mbonyane
& Ladzani, 2011). Even so, these businesses performed a critical role in meeting the
needs of the poor by supplying goods and services through flexible business models
and lower transactional costs (Godfrey, 2013).
Informal, survivalist businesses faced many challenges that threatened their viability
and prohibited their development. They lacked access to financial resources
(Preisendörfer, Bitz, & Bezuidenhout, 2012; Yu, 2012) that could be invested into
working capital or growth opportunities. Although Ligthelm (2005) argued that this
was not unique to SA, as entrepreneurs in other countries too faced difficulties when
trying to raise financing for their businesses.
Copyright UCT
18
Often the owners were deficient in the skills necessary to effectively manage their
businesses (Mbonyane & Ladzani, 2011; Skinner, 2006) and because the businesses
were usually started out of necessity rather than market opportunity, making a success
of the venture became a difficult proposition.
Informal, survivalist businesses were often situated in rural areas and urban townships
where they were faced with poor infrastructure, lack of services, crime and high
transport costs (Ligthelm, 2005; Skinner, 2006), all of which placed severe constraints
on business activities.
Moreover, these businesses operated within a highly competitive environment. The
competitive nature of the environment led to isolationist and fragmented business
practices (Skinner, 2006). Ironically, the underutilisation of networks increased the
cost of accessing information and by extension, the cost of doing business.
The challenges faced by informal, survivalist businesses were compounded by the
fact that they received little to no support from government agencies. Most
programmes were targeted towards formalised and registered Small Medium and
Micro Enterprises (SMMEs). The needs of survivalist businesses were vastly different
(Ligthelm, 2008) and they were therefore not able to make use of the programmes
offered by government agencies.
In order to tackle poverty and inequality, the South African government set the target
to create 11 million jobs by the year 2030 (Valodia, 2013). Reaching this goal will
require interventions focused on tackling the above-mentioned challenges faced by
the informal sector, especially in light of the numbers currently employed within the
sector and its potential for providing further employment opportunities.
2.1.2 ECD Centres
According to literature, the foundations for all future learning are laid in the first few
years of life; with parental involvement, good nutrition and early stimulation being
key to facilitating the acquisition of skills (Anderson et al., 2003; Dodici, Draper, &
Peterson, 2003; Foster, Lambert, Abbott-Shim, McCarty, & Franze, 2005). However,
in South Africa, opportunities for quality care and education were highly unequal
(Spaull, 2013). These key inputs were found to be either lacking or absent in children
Copyright UCT
19
who came from low socioeconomic backgrounds, which resulted in gaps that lead to
poor educational outcomes later in life. Deficits in learning were apparent from an
early age and worsened over time (Burger, 2010; Eldering & Leseman, 1993).
In an international study, Stipek and Ryan (1997), as cited in Burger (2010), found
that children from poor socioeconomic backgrounds experienced significant cognitive
developmental lags during the school going age, when compared to their peers from
an advantaged background. In South Africa, about 40% of children (aged 0 to 5 years)
from poor communities were estimated as attending formal and informal Early
Childhood Development Centres and crèches. These facilities were often
overcrowded, had untrained teachers, provided poor nutrition, little stimulation and
could not adequately cater for the developmental needs of young children (UNICEF,
2005).
From these findings, it was apparent that interventions targeted at these organisations,
in particular, those which tap into existing community structures to provide the
resources needed to improve ECD centres and crèches, could alleviate some of the
difficulties discussed and might positively impact ECD outcomes.
2.2 Financing and collaboration models
2.2.1 Microfinance
At the beginning of the 21st century, world leaders under the aegis of the United
Nations (UN), agreed to “uphold the principles of human dignity, equality and equity,
and free the world from extreme poverty (United Nations, 2014, p. 3). In terms of this
agreement, known as the Millennium Declaration, signatories, including South Africa,
agreed on eight goals, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) with set
timelines, and aimed at addressing the most urgent development challenges of the
time. One of these goals, the achievement of financial inclusion for the poor, became
a priority for global leaders. In order to reach this goal, and to directly or indirectly
impact the remaining MDGs, it was understood that poor people would need to be
provided with access to affordable financial products (United Nations, 2014).
Copyright UCT
20
In a recent review, the Bank Seta in South Africa maintained that offering the poor
better access to affordable financial services would have an impact on driving down
poverty, and reducing inequality (Bank Seta, 2013). Mosley (2001) as cited in
Lahimer, Dash and Zaiter (2013) agreed with the assertion that microfinance
initiatives could reduce poverty, while Hietalahti and Linden (2006) found that
microfinance could assist in ameliorating the circumstances of families living in
abject poverty.
With the success of Grameen bank in Bangladesh, financial institutions realised that it
was possible to service the poor by granting microloans and remain profitable
(Neverson, 2013). This phenomenon was not limited to financial institutions; global
multinationals across industries have begun to look into opportunities at the “bottom
of the pyramid”; Prahalad and Hammond (2002) argued that there existed massive,
untapped potential in servicing the poor, despite the hostility of the environment in
which poor people live.
Baumann (2004) posited that the primary goal for microcredit institutions should be
to extend credit to the marginalised and that the secondary goal would be to do so in a
sustainable manner. However, institutions that have entered the microfinance sector
have done so purely from a profit maximisation strategy; this approach has achieved
poor results “in providing access to small-scale credit for business” (Baumann, 2004,
p. 117).
Recent studies have, however, shown results consistent with the assertion made by
Baumann (2004) that microcredit has had adverse effects on poor communities.
Increased competition amongst lenders has resulted in narrowing margins in the
sector (Volschenk & Biekpe, 2003). Reckless lending practices have caused high
levels of indebtedness and high default rates (Centre for Inclusive Banking in Africa,
2011), leaving the poor worse off (Volschenk & Biekpe, 2003).
In South Africa, the microfinance sector remains in early development, relative to
other industries. Therefore, it is has been struggling with high cost structures, the lack
of skilled and experienced personnel as well as a lack of institutional support
(Baumann, 2004). The spectacular collapse of the biggest micro-lender, African
Copyright UCT
21
Bank, in 2014, illustrated the extent to which the microfinance sector has not yet
established itself as a viable mechanism for the financial inclusion of the poor.
2.2.2 Cooperatives
Pryor (1983) and Zamagni and Zamagni (2012) defined cooperatives as voluntary
groups of individuals or organisations that come together in joint enterprise in order to
enter new markets, lower the costs of doing business and strengthen their bargaining
power. Shiferaw, Obare and Muricho (2008) noted that cooperatives had become an
accepted mechanism for organising economic activity in an effort to overcome the
market-system failures of high costs and coordination problems that hampered the
delivery of services to marginalised poor communities.
It was found that organisations that joined a cooperative were able to retain their
autonomy, although decisions taken on behalf of the cooperative were made
collectively (Wanyama, Develtere, & Pollet, 2009). The International Cooperative
Alliance, as cited in Beesley and Ballard (2013) defined cooperatives as “autonomous
associations of persons united voluntarily to meet the common economic, social and
cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically controlled
enterprise”.
Wanyama et al. (2009) added to the discourse by highlighting that South African
cooperatives have a “social movement” aspect to them. These organisations were
focused on creating social capital and empowering members from previously
disadvantaged groups. This aspect of cooperatives is particularly prevalent in
cooperatives that were created by government in order to achieve social goals (Pryor,
1983).
In South Africa, various government policies and regulatory frameworks aimed at
supporting cooperatives were introduced with the intent to facilitate job creation,
increase employment and alleviate poverty (Department of Trade and Industry, 2012).
According to the Department of Trade and Industry (2012), there were 43,062
registered cooperatives in South Africa, the majority of which were owned by
previously disadvantaged women in rural communities. The agricultural sector
Copyright UCT
22
accounted for 25% of registered cooperatives, growth of which was driven largely by
government’s focus on rural development (Department of Trade and Industry, 2012).
Yet, despite the sound theoretical basis for cooperatives being a suitable vehicle to
drive commercial enterprises that have social impact, their success in South Africa
has been minimal.
A number of reasons have been cited for the poor performance of cooperatives.
Wanyama et al. (2009) argued that overregulation by government agencies had stifled
the growth and development of cooperatives. Okem and Lawrence (2013) attributed
the lacklustre performance of cooperatives to the fact that most cooperatives in South
Africa were run by previously disadvantaged individuals, who often lacked the
technical skills required to manage organisations, and thus they were hindered in their
attempts to establish robust businesses. In particular, cooperatives operating in rural
areas struggled to access the services they required to run their organisations
successfully (Okem & Lawrence, 2013).
The collaborative decision-making processes that formed the basis of cooperatives
were also found to impede progress and slow down organisational response times
(Beesley & Ballard, 2013). As a result, many cooperatives found it difficult to adjust
to changing market conditions timeously and effectively.
Furthermore, cooperatives tended to operate in industries where competition from
incumbents was high. High competition, coupled with poor networks, made it
difficult for such enterprises to survive (Okem & Lawrence, 2013; Wanyama et al.,
2009).
Wanyama et al. (2009) stated that successful cooperatives have “strong leaders, are
well organised and have a market-driven focus.” In contrast, cooperatives based in
South Africa were found largely to lack these attributes as evinced by the findings of
researchers investigating the success and failure factors for South African
cooperatives above.
Copyright UCT
23
2.2.3 Stokvels
Naong (2009) and (Mashigo and Schoeman (2012) defined stokvels as informal
savings and credit extension groups, predominantly utilised in black communities in
South Africa. The term “stokvel” was derived from the phrase “stock fair”, used to
describe rotational cattle auctions held by early English settlers in the 19th century
(Naong, 2009; Verhoef, 2001a).
Ardener (1964, p. 201) as cited in Naong (2009), defined stokvels as “an association
formed upon a core of participants who agree to make regular contributions to a fund
which is given, in whole or in part, to each contributor in rotation”.
Biggart (2001) and Buijs (1998) found that informal savings groups, commonly
known as rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs), were common in mid-
to low-income economies, such as those found in Africa, Asia and India, where
financial institutions were weak and poor rural communities were excluded from any
active participation.
According to Verhoef (2001b), South Africa was an exception in this regard.
Although South Africa had one of the best developed banking and financial industries
in the world, black communities exhibited a preference for using stokvels to save and
access credit. Research estimates suggested that almost one in every two black adults
belonged to one or more stokvel groups (Irving, 2005; Verhoef, 2001b).
Arko-Achemfour (2012) found that stokvel members generally used the proceeds to
purchase groceries in bulk, pay for durable household goods, cover school fees and
repay debt. The largest portion of stokvel proceeds, however, were spent on funeral
and burial expenses; research carried out by African Response Research estimated
that 65% of stokvels were burial societies (Slade, 2014).
In 2013, the size of the stokvel market was estimated at approximately R45.1 billion
(Old Mutual, 2014). Due to its size, the stokvel industry has attracted significant
attention from formal finance and insurance institutions over the years. Numerous
low-cost savings and insurance products have been targeted at members of stokvels
with little success (Naong, 2009). Vermaak (2000), Gugerty (2007) and Irving (2005)
Copyright UCT
24
argued that the reason for this failure was that stokvel members placed other values
on membership, the benefits of which extended far beyond financial gains.
Stokvels appeared to fulfil a social purpose that was not satisfied by members
transacting with formal institutions. Verhoef (2001a) asserted that the social benefits
of stokvels were as important as the economic ones. Stokvels were predicated on the
principles of “Ubuntu”, the African cultural notion of reciprocity, caring for one
another and treating each other with respect (Mukorombindo & Coetzee, 2013; Shale,
2013; Vermaak, 2000).
Mukorombindo and Coetzee (2013) posited that stokvels were necessary for survival
in poor communities in that they provided a social network that could be relied upon
for emotional, physical and financial support. Irving (2005) stated that when women
were imprisoned for various offenses under South Africa’s apartheid laws, members
of her stokvel group would look after her children until her release. More recently,
stokvels have proven valuable in reducing risk and enabling the poor to cope with
unforeseen circumstances and emergencies (Mashigo & Schoeman, 2012;
Mukorombindo & Coetzee, 2013).
Successful stokvel groups had high levels of trust and loyalty amongst members who
shared close personal relationships and often lived in close proximity of each other
(Shale, 2013; Thorp, Stewart, & Heyer, 2005; Verhoef, 2001a). Karlan (2007)
emphasised that the social connections that existed within the group was key to the
success of the group. The close personal relationships and feelings of loyalty made it
possible for members to hold each other accountable to the group, which led to very
low default rates (Irving, 2005; Mashigo & Schoeman, 2012). Members were
reluctant to risk their reputations, and by extension risk their support network, within
the community. They would rather default on bank loans or other debt supplied by
formal institutions (Buijs, 1998).
The finance and administration functions of stokvels were carried out in a transparent
manner. Reports were read out in meetings, cash was counted or reconciled in the
presence of members and decisions were taken through consensus (Arko-Achemfour,
2012; Shale, 2013). This transparency of operations was seen to have been
responsible for the high levels of trust amongst members.
Copyright UCT
25
The transaction costs of belonging to a stokvel were low when compared to those of
financial institutions. Stokvels had few administrative requirements; meetings were
held in close proximity to the homes of members; and payments were made equitably
and efficiently (Buijs, 1998; Casson & Giusta, 2004; Mashigo & Schoeman, 2012).
However, Thorp et al. (2005) criticised informal savings groups for excluding the
truly poor from benefitting from the social networks, as membership depended on the
ability to make financial contributions. This view was echoed by Mukorombindo and
Coetzee (2013) who argued that the benefits of social capital were particularly critical
to the vulnerable poor, who were excluded from stokvels.
When assessed from a purely commercial perspective, the interest earned on stokvel
savings was considerably lower than what could have been achieved with traditional
investment products. Proceeds from stokvels were used primarily for consumption.
Arko-Achemfour (2012) argued that these proceeds could have a potentially deeper
impact on poverty alleviation if they were spent on income generating,
entrepreneurial activities.
2.3 Benefits of cooperation
The benefits of collaboration and cooperation have been well-documented.
Pelaez, Yu and Lang (2013) defined group collaboration and cooperation in business
activity as commerce with social capital. Prahalad and Hammond (2002) argued that
while serving the poor individually might not be a viable business proposition, there
was certainly a business case for serving them in aggregated groups, and that these
aggregated groups had the potential to generate superior profits.
Pelaez et al (2013) forwarded the idea that improved coordination and cooperation
amongst businesses had the capacity to improve outcomes for all individual
stakeholders. Networks, too, had the potential to reduce the cost of doing business,
and to forge paths to new markets. Okem and Lawrence (2013) stressed that building
and entrenching such networks would allow members to achieve economies of scale.
Copyright UCT
26
Through membership of a group, businesses or individuals might gain access to the
skills they lacked; furthermore, belonging to a group reduced the cost of accessing
information to members, while deepening the varieties of information they were able
to access (Hardy & Magrath, 1987). Joshi and Smith (2002) as cited in Okem and
Lawrence (2013), agreed that networks and groups were able to cut down on the costs
of production by sharing knowledge, pooling risks and acting in a coordinated
manner. This coordinated action had the ability to lead to improvements in quality
standards and service levels.
Hardy and Magrath (1987) found that group purchasing could protect businesses that
operated in markets sensitive to changes in price. Group purchasing also placed
members in strengthened positions when negotiating pricing and contract terms with
suppliers (Hardy & Magrath, 1987).
2.4 Conclusion
Literature on mechanisms aimed at achieving financial inclusion for the poor revealed
that significant work remained to be done in order to accomplish this goal.
On one hand, the stokvel model appeared successful in providing poor people with
access to funds and extending credit to them. Stokvels had high participation and
adherence rates, while at the same time groups provided members with a supportive
and reliable social network. Membership of a stokvel reduced the risks associated
with unforeseen circumstances that would otherwise result in devastation for a
household. However, stokvels generated low rates of interest, and proceeds from
stokvels were primarily used to fund consumption. An opportunity therefore exists to
improve on this model by encouraging the funding of income generating and
investment activity.
Cooperatives, on the other hand, have had mixed results both in their ability to
strengthen social networks and their ability to develop viable business practices.
While the concept of businesses working together had powerful potential,
cooperatives had not yet found a way to streamline their internal practices or to fully
leverage networks and relationships. Though well-intentioned, high regulation by
Copyright UCT
27
various government agencies resulted in stifling development and growth for
cooperatives.
The microfinance industry succeeded in highlighting the need to offer poor people
access to affordable finance. However, this new industry has grappled with low
margins, reckless practices and a lack of skills and experience. All of these factors
have resulted in the poor bearing the brunt of the negative consequences of over-
indebtedness.
The table below summarises the critical factors that influence the financing and
collaboration models discussed in the literature review.
Table 2: Summary of critical success and failure factors of financing models
Model Advantages Disadvantages
Microfinance Provides access to finance for the
poor
High transaction costs
Reckless lending practices
Increased indebtedness
High default rates
Instruments difficult to understand
Little or no social capital
Cooperatives Lowers costs of doing business for
informal businesses
Strengthens buying power
Organisations retain autonomy
Social goals
Heavily regulated, therefore onerous
legislative requirements
Contracts difficult to understand
Lack the skills required to run them
Lack leadership required to make
them work
Weak networks
Cumbersome decision-making
processes
Poorly organised
Stokvel Provides access to finance
Low transaction costs
Strengthens individual buying power
Provides a social net (reduces risk)
Strong social capital
Negligible default rates
High levels of trust and loyalty
Transparent administration
Democratic decision-making
Low interest earned
Used primarily for consumption
Excludes the very poor
Copyright UCT
28
By providing employment opportunities for a significant portion of the population and
supplying services to the poor, informal enterprises perform a critical function in the
economy. SSEs contribute even further by providing a social net for the very poor,
who are excluded from all other forms of enterprise. However, SSEs are plagued by a
lack of critical skills, lack of financial resources and isolation. Owners and operators
of such enterprises are in clear need of a business model that can help them achieve
cohesion and allow them to aggregate their social and financial resources to create
viable, sustainable businesses.
ECD centres or crèches in urban townships are often inadequate to the needs of the
communities they serve, both in terms of quality and number. Yet, very few ECD
owners and operators of ECD businesses have access to the resources required to
enhance operations.
In view of these concerns and challenges and in consideration of the importance of
the services they provide to the neediest and most vulnerable segment of South
Africa’s population as exemplars of social service enterprises, this study determined
to investigate the viability of SSEs operational in the ECD field in urban townships,
utilising the stokvel model to build capacity and access financial and other resources.
Copyright UCT
29
Section 3: Research Methodology
3.1 Research approach and strategy
The purpose of this study was to explore the transferability of the stokvel model to the
informal business setting.
The study followed a qualitative, inductive approach. A qualitative approach was
deemed appropriate for the study as the objective was to generate a working theory,
rather than to test one that exists (Bryman & Bell, 2011). A qualitative approached
was taken because it allowed the researcher the latitude to be able to engage more
specifically with the participant’s perspectives, their understanding of events and their
lived context (Locke, 2001).
Due to the exploratory nature of the study, the investigations involved the drawing of
inferences from the patterns gleaned from the data collected from observations and
interviews; which made it suitable for an inductive approach (Eriksson & Kovalainen,
2008).
This study took on a “social constructionist” (Bryman & Bell, 2011, p. 23)
ontological approach because the participants formed an integral part in shaping the
process by bringing in their own views and attaching their own meaning to the
research questions. The interactions amongst the participants and observations made
at their places of business all formed part of the research data.
Bryman and Bell (2011) highlighted a few limitations of qualitative research, namely,
that it is subjective, as researchers tend to find it difficult to maintain distance from
their “subjects”. They further state that it is “difficult to replicate” (p. 408) and that
the findings cannot be generalized.
To minimize the effects of the limitation of subjectivity, the researcher recorded all
interviews and reviewed them later, once removed from the participant’s
environment. This process created some distance and increased the researcher’s
ability to remain objective.
Copyright UCT
30
3.2 Research design
Regarding the design of a study, De Vaus states that “research design refers to the
structure of an enquiry” (2001, p. 16). The research design for this study is one that
allowed the participants to feel comfortable to state their views openly and within in a
non-threatening environment. It was of utmost importance that participants were able
to state their views and perceptions in an open and truthful manner.
Bryman and Bell (2011) state that “a research method is simply a technique for
collecting data” (p. 41). The research methods that were applied in the study included:
(1) semi-structured interviews, (2) participant observations, and (3) a focus groups
discussion.
The advantage of semi-structured interviews is that they are likely to produce rich
data and insights that may have been missed by both the researcher and participant
(Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2008). They offer flexibility which allows for clarification
and probing (Bryman & Bell, 2011); this makes them appropriate for an exploratory
study.
(Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2008) define participant observation as “the most
demanding” (p. 86) research method. It requires that the researcher act both as
participant and distant observer. In order to participate fully, and to successfully
decode observations and the data collected, it is paramount that the researcher
possesses an in-depth understanding of the crèche environment.
The participants’ ability to work together formed the core focus of this study. The
focus group discussion was thus important in that it allowed the researcher to observe
the dynamics between the participants and their shared understanding of the research
area. Interactions amongst focus group participants are described as the “heart of
modern focus group research” by Eriksson and Kovalainen (2008, p. 173).
Copyright UCT
31
3.3 Population and sample
Population
The population for the study includes all informal, survivalist businesses that operate
in the township of Khayelitsha in Cape Town. The exact number of those businesses
is unknown as they are not registered by any formal body.
Sample
Due to the nature of the study, which required that participants who were all in the
same line of work and who would have to imagine scenarios where they could
collaborate, a combination of non-probability snowball and purposive sampling
methods were used. The first participant was asked to recommend a known crèche
owner who would be willing to be part of the study. The first crèche owner who
agreed to take part then identified two others. Although non-probability sampling
methods limit the ability to generalise the findings, they do allow for more in-depth
investigations to be conducted (Bryman & Bell, 2011).
Additional criteria for inclusion for the crèche owners were as follows:
the crèche must have been in existence for three years or longer
the crèche must have a minimum of 20 children
each crèche must be within a 5km radius of the other participants
Participants that were included in the study appear in the table below.
Copyright UCT
32
Table 3: List of study organisations
No. of
Participants
Participant Expertise Expected knowledge area
1 Entrepreneur, with businesses across
townships in Western & Eastern Cape
Insights into the township business climate
1 NGO working in the ECD industry Insights into the general ECD landscape
1 NGO working running Group Savings
in rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal
and the Eastern Cape
Insights into the mechanisms that drive
successful savings groups
3 Crèche owners in Khayelitsha Insights into the challenges faced by crèche
organisations
Their perspective on stokvels and
collaboration
3.4 The research instrument
A questionnaire was used for the semi-structured interviews (see appendix 2). A
semi-structured interview protocol was used as it allowed flexibility to the researcher,
which would enable the exploration of any new themes that emerged (Bryman & Bell,
2011).
The questions for the semi-structured interviews were intended to gauge if the
participants had found value in being part of a stokvel and to ascertain if they thought
that value could be transferrable to their business environment.
The focus group questions (see appendix 3) were open-ended and kept broad in order
to facilitate discussion amongst participants (Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2008). The
objective of the focus group discussion was to gain an understanding into how the
individual crèche owners would structure an organisational group savings scheme.
Copyright UCT
33
3.5 Data collection
Data was collected through interviews, focus groups and observations. Face to face
interviews were conducted with all but one participant, whose interview was
conducted telephonically. Interviews were recorded with permission from each
participant and were conducted at a time and venue that was convenient for the
participants. Interviews were conducted in both English and isiXhosa. Observations
were carried out at all five of the participating crèches, where the researcher made
detailed notes about the environment and interactions between subjects.
3.6 Data analysis
The grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data. Bryman and Bell define
this method as deriving theory from data (2011, p. 576). This approach seems suited
to this explorative research at it allows for themes to emerge guided by “logic” and
“creativity” (Locke, 2001). However, criticisms of grounded theory research have
included questioning the claim that it leads to the actual formation of theory (Bryman
& Bell, 2011). For the purposes of this research, gaining an understanding of how the
participants engage with the propositions of the study was far more valuable than
acquiring a transferrable theoretical framework.
Process of analysis
Once the data had been collected, the recordings were transcribed. Interviews that had
been conducted in isiXhosa were translated and transcribed in English. It was then
coded, which resulted in the generation of concepts and general themes (Bryman &
Bell, 2011). The coding and concept generating cycle was repeated several times
(Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2008). The coding process involved all three coding types;
“open, axial and selective” (Eriksson & Kovalainen, 2008, p. 160). During the open
coding process, the researcher constructed broad categories from the data, which
constituted general summations of findings. Once broad categories were identified,
they were constantly compared and relationships between the categories were
established during the axial coding process. Once the categories had been saturated,
the relationship between them were explored in depth (Bryman & Bell, 2011) and as
Copyright UCT
34
stated by Bryman & Bell (2011), “hypotheses about connections between categories
emerged” (p. 580).
3.7 Limitations
The researcher views the limitations of this study as including the following:
Researcher bias: the researcher brought her own biases, preferences and mental
models to the research project. These biases become particularly impactful during the
data analysis phase of the study.
Responder bias: findings in this study were limited by the specifics experiences and
perceptions of the responders.
Language barrier: the crèche owner respondents communicated predominately in
isiXhosa, which was then translated into English by the researcher. Certain nuances
may have been lost during the translations process.
Small sample size: a sample size of five crèches is not statistically significant and
therefore further inferences cannot be made from the findings.
Tightly-defined geographical area: the study was carried out in Khayelitsha with
participants who have established relationships and live in close proximity to one
another. Therefore the findings may not be valid outside of those exact parameters.
3.8 Validity and reliability
Validity of the study was maximised by the researcher interviewing and interacting
with the same group of people across different scenarios. There were opportunities to
ask the same questions from different perspectives and contexts. This ensured that the
researcher was able to ascertain if the observations and responses given, all related to
the actual research question and could be attributable to nothing else (Bryman & Bell,
2011). This served to maximise the internal validity of the study.
To maximise the internal reliability of the study, the interviews and focus group were
recorded and the researcher will make the recording (or parts thereof) available to her
Copyright UCT
35
supervisor, to further validate the observations of the researcher (Bryman & Bell,
2011).
3.9 Informed consent and research ethics
The researcher at all times conducted herself with integrity and respect, for both the
process and the participants in the study.
The purpose of the study was to be clearly and simply explained to all participants,
after which their consent was requested. Participants were made to understand that
they had the right to withdraw their consent at any time during the process and that
participation is voluntary. They were also told of their right to refrain from answering
any question they may have found uncomfortable.
All of the participants did not require anonymity and agreed to be identified.
The findings of the final report will be made available to participants should they be
interested in the outcomes.
Copyright UCT
36
Section 4: Findings
This exploratory study revealed findings that can be grouped into two distinct sets of
themes. The first group of themes defined ways in which the crèche might be
described as a hybrid organisation. These findings illuminated the characteristics that
distinguish social services organisations, such as crèches, from other forms of
organisations, such as NGOs or purely commercial informal enterprises.
The second group of themes outlined elements or parameters that would have to exist
in order to create an environment conducive for crèches working together within the
framework of a stokvel.
The sample of the study consisted of eight participants: five crèche owners,
representatives from two NGOs and one entrepreneur with businesses in townships
across the Western and Eastern Cape.
Table 4: Details of study participants
Name Organisation No. of years in
operation
Participant 1 TM Crèche (105 children) 4 years
Participant 2 ZV Crèche (108 children) 5 years
Participant 3 JP Crèche (50 children) 5 years
Participant 4 NZ Crèche (28 children) 6 years
Participant 5 PT Crèche (60 children) 3 years
Participant 6 AK SaveAct, NGO 7 years
Participant 7 SL Ilifa Labantwana, NGO 8 years
Participant 8 LR Entrepreneur 10 years
Copyright UCT
37
4.1 The nature of crèches as organisations
4.1.1 Owners/principals set the tone for the crèche
The owners/principals of the crèches set the tone, mood and culture of the facility.
The energy and drive of the owners who were part of the study, was reflected in their
staff as well as the children in the crèche. The owner of one of the participating
crèches had been recently widowed; he took over the running of the crèche from his
late wife. His sense of mourning and loss was palpable and was felt in the general
mood of the crèche. The researcher observed very sombre teachers and lethargic
children with low energy levels, which seemed to mirror that of the owner. In
contrast, the personality of a loud and cheerful crèche owner was reflected in all
aspects of the crèche, from the brightly coloured exterior, to the garrulous, engaged
teachers and energetic children.
There seemed to be correlation between the level of ECD training of the owner and
that of the teachers. Owners who had training appeared to encourage the training of
their staff. Conversely, owners who had little training did not seem to actively seek
out training for their staff. The owner with the highest level of ECD training amongst
the cohort of owners had the most trained staff; training within her facility ranged
from First Aid courses for all staff members to nutrition courses for the cook. In
contrast, an owner who had no ECD training stated that none of their staff had any
further education beyond various high school levels.
Registered crèches are required to have a board of directors in order to comply with
DSD statutes. From discussions with the owners during observations, it emerged that,
although board members were listed on registration papers, they played no part in the
running or administration of the crèche. The owners took all decisions, with no input
from the ‘board’. When asked about this apparent discrepancy, one crèche owner
asserted that the “whole thing is nonsensical and a waste of time,” as she believed
that few people in the township would know how to run the crèche better than she did.
Copyright UCT
38
Figure 2: The transference of knowledge and energy in crèches
4.1.2 Strong social capital
From the study, it was apparent that the crèche owners seemed to have strong
established relationships amongst themselves. They were organised in sector ECD
Forums and used these platforms to check in with each other and to discuss industry
related issues. Both registered and unregistered crèches belonged to the same
network. The participants reported that most crèche owners were very transparent
with each other within this forum. As a result, those within the network were all
aware of the challenges faced by each centre.
All of the five crèche owners within the sample indicated that they were part of an
ECD forum and that they often interacted with other crèche owners within their
community. During the first observation, one crèche owner shared with the researcher
a long list of other owners whom she claimed to know very well and with whom she
often worked with in some way. Another said that the forum was a good place to get
advice on matters related to running her crèche. Several participants added that they
had become friends with other crèche owners and that they socialised with them
outside of the forum.
Copyright UCT
39
All participants reported feeling supported by other crèche owners in their forums.
One told the researcher during an observation, that he was often given excess
groceries by another, well-funded crèche. He stated further that there were several
crèche owners within his network from whom he sought advice. Another study
participant too spoke about how she received help and support from fellow crèche
owners: “I have a great relationship with other owners. They are the ones that help
me […] they visit me at my crèche.”
During an interview, a participant said that she appreciated the mentoring from more
experienced owners – but that the group welcomed input from everyone, including
those new to ECD. Another respondent, who stressed the importance of collaboration,
shared this view, and stated to the researcher, “… not working together is what causes
people to not progress.”
In response to a question relating to theft, a participant told the researcher that
“thieves do not steal books and chairs because there is no market for them because
other crèche centres would never buy them knowing that they were stolen from
another centre.”
Responses such as these served as an excellent illustration of the level of support and
trust that seemed to exist amongst crèche owners. The participants reported that
although they worked under difficult circumstances, none of them felt alone or
isolated within their communities.
The strength of the social capital was most evident in how every participant stated
that they felt an obligation to help crèches that were worse off than what they were.
One participant, the owner of an unregistered, poorly resourced crèche, confirmed this
by stating the following during her interview: “I often go to the other crèches’ owners
and they try to help me with different things”
In discussing the possibility of crèches working together in a stokvel, one
participant’s conditions was that every group should have a poorly resourced crèche
that they support.
Copyright UCT
40
4.1.3 Crèches not viewed as commercial enterprises
Given that all the crèches were privately owned and charged fees for their services,
the researcher had expected that the owners would consider them business enterprises
and themselves, entrepreneurs. However, this assumption proved incorrect, as profit
generation was not the key driver for these owners.
The study participants appeared not to view their crèches as commercial enterprises,
but rather as ‘social service enterprises’. This was evident in the ways in which they
speak about themselves, their community and the children in their care. One crèche
owner remarked, “… we’re not making profit; we’re just taking care of the children.”
In a different interview, another crèche owner shared a similar sentiment by saying:
“We do this for love. It makes no money.”
The crèche owners and operators viewed themselves as custodians of children. Two
crèche owners stated that they had each started a crèche because they could no longer
“look after the madam’s children” while children in their own communities were
being neglected and subjected to violence.
Another crèche owner stated that she had been unemployed and had already been
looking after a few of her neighbours’ children; when the numbers grew, she made the
decision to make it official and open a crèche.
Children spend a significant amount of time at the crèche centres. These centres
seemed less like educational service providers and more akin to surrogate homes. The
owners fulfilled the roles of surrogate parents. One respondent stated during his
interview that “most parents are working and there are no aunties or gogos
[grandmothers to look after the children]; they are in the Eastern Cape. So there has
to be someone that’s taking care.”
The crèche owners and operators all described a sense that they existed to keep
children off the streets, safe and fed while their parents and guardians were at work or
school. One defined the purpose of her crèche as being there to look after the
children’s wellbeing. “We’re here to keep children off the street […] even the poor
ones,” she said.
Copyright UCT
41
Overcrowded facilities might be considered a manifestation of this idea. All of the
crèche owners surveyed seemed to feel obligated to take children in, even if the
crèche was full. For as one explained, they’d said that they would be helping the
community and could therefore not turn away a child in need.
The crèche centres provided a social net for very poor families. When asked how they
dealt with non-payment of fees, all the crèche owners told the researcher that they
offered the parents extended payment terms or that sometimes they accepted that they
would never receive back-payment of outstanding fees. One crèche owner lamented:
“Parents don’t pay school fees. They pay when they can, but we must be patient.”
However, none of the study participants expelled children due to non-payment. One
commented that even if fees were not paid, they would “never throw the child into the
street”. Another added that if she knew that the family was very poor, she would send
leftover food to the home with the child.
All crèche owners reported that the financial situation of their crèches was somewhat
alleviated by certain working parents handing over the entire childcare grant that they
received from the government to the crèche. In effect, this often meant that they paid
more in fees than was stipulated. The researcher surmised from this that crèches
cross-subsidise children from very poor families by means of the additional fees paid
by working parents.
All of the owners reported that they attempted to keep fees as low as possible in order
to ensure that they were affordable to the majority of their parent body.
4.1.4 Crèches as a source of pride for owners
All the participants evinced a great sense of pride in the work that they do, as though
it were a vocation. One commented that her status had been elevated as a result of
owning a crèche, both in her home town and within her current community.
All the crèches observed by the researcher were immaculately clean and tidy even
though they might have been housed in a basic shack that had no running water or
electricity. They all had brightly painted exteriors and neatly swept sand in the tiny
front areas; all of which stood in stark contrast to their immediate environment and
the homes surrounding them.
Copyright UCT
42
The owners recognised that many crèches in the community failed to meet the
standards and norms set out by the Department of Social Development. They seemed
to consider it their collective duty to work towards ensuring that all crèches reached a
point of meeting minimum standards. To this end, the better resourced, better
functioning crèches actively helped those that were struggling. One crèche owner
spoke of receiving assistance from a few crèches in his community; another said that
she received regular assistance from neighbouring crèches, while another respondent
reported that she often checked in on crèches that she was concerned about.
All the crèche owners and operators in the study seemed to possess the ability to
stretch what little resources they had, very far. Given the lack of management
training, low rates of computer literacy and the dearth of resources, the researcher
assumed that such crèches would not remain operational for very long. However, the
owners and operators in the study demonstrated remarkable tenacity and
resourcefulness in their ability to be highly efficient in the allocation of the meagre
resources they had at their disposal.
4.1.5 Low levels of education and training
All of the participants had low levels of tertiary education. The crèche owners were
all at varying levels of ECD training. ECD training comprises five modules, each of
which takes 18 months to complete. This training is provided free of charge by the
government. None of the crèche owners in the study had completed all five. One
owner possessed no ECD training at all. She did, however, indicate an intention to
enrol in a course. “There is a training place in Claremont, but I am still waiting,” she
said, but did not clarify her reasons for delaying the start of her training.
The teachers too had very little training. Two of the owners in the sample had
enrolled their teachers in the ECD training programme. Both reported that the most
any of their teachers had completed was one or two modules. The teachers at one of
the crèches have no ECD training at all, and there was no plan to enrol them at the
time of the study.
During the focus group, all of the participants indicated that lack of training was an
impediment to their ability to run their crèches effectively. They all indicated a
Copyright UCT
43
yearning for computer training, in particular. There was a feeling that being able to
use computers would lighten their current workload.
4.1.6 Lack of infrastructure
Three of the crèches observed were in an informal settlement, in shacks. Two had no
water or electricity, while the other had an illegal electricity connection but no water.
During the focus group discussion, the crèche owners spoke about their concern that
their “structures” were not entirely safe for children. As one described it, “… the
structure that is there is not comfortable for children […] so it’s not a safe structure.”
Notwithstanding the comfort of their facilities, all owners and operators indicated that
providing safer buildings would be a priority should they be able to raise the capital.
None of the crèches in the study had onsite access to computers, printers or fax
machines. All of the required administration and educational worksheets were done
manually. In order to email, fax or print, the owner had to travel by taxi to the nearest
shopping hub in order to find an internet café, which was both expensive and time-
consuming.
4.1.7 Onerous legislative requirements
All of the crèche owners recognised the importance of being registered with the
various government departments. However, they each bemoaned the difficulty of the
process.
When asked about the most difficult aspect of running a crèche, they each indicated
that dealing with DSD procedures and trying to stay compliant was the biggest
challenge that they faced. Each crèche owner felt burdened by the various, onerous
legislative requirements for registration. As the owner of an unregistered crèche, one
respondent told the researcher of her desire to become registered but that she was
unable to meet the minimum requirements. “… all the things that social development
wants, we don’t have,” she stated.
In order to be compliant, crèches need to register with various departments that have
differing requirements. One respondent stated that even within the same department,
different people communicated different requirements; she explained, “… the things
Copyright UCT
44
they want, they don’t tell us. We are not clear […] You get to this office, they say they
want this and this; then you get to another office, they say, no, that one was wrong…”
One of the respondents, a worker from Ilifa Labantwana an NGO that conceptualises,
implements and manages national ECD programmes that are based on best practice,
also raised this issue. She explained that in her organisation’s work, they found that
ECD practitioners were inundated with onerous requirements from many different
departments.
In order to operate a crèche, the owner needs approval from the Department of Social
Development, the City of Cape Town Zoning, the Department of Education and the
Department of Health. No central place was apparent where crèche owners could go
to access accurate information about the registration requirements and the process
involved.
Table 5: Summary of the characteristics of the crèche organisation
Characteristics of the crèche organisation
Owners/principals set the tone
Strong social capital
Crèches not viewed as commercial enterprises
Crèches a great source of pride for owners
Low levels of education
Lack of infrastructure
Onerous legislative requirements
4.2 Findings relating to HOW a stokvel might work
During the individual semi-structured interviews, all of the participants indicated that
they would be willing to form a stokvel in order to access funds for their crèche. A
focus group was then convened to discuss what a crèche stokvel might look like. The
findings from the individual semi-structured interviews, together with the discussion
points from the focus group, indicated that although the participants would welcome a
stokvel, they would consider it only if it were defined within tight parameters. These
parameters are discussed below.
Copyright UCT
45
4.2.1 Groups must have autonomy
All the participants agreed that it was important that they were able to select the
individuals with whom they would form a stokvel group, One respondent stressed this
during her interview by saying, “I would invite people I know and live with already
[…] you know the crèche owners that you would choose […] there are some people I
cannot mix with.” Another echoed this sentiment by adding: “the people who join
must be screened.”
In an interview with the participant from SaveAct, an NGO that runs group saving
schemes in rural SA, this ‘self-section’ criterion was highlighted as being key to the
successful savings groups that were part of his organisation.
Once formed, the group must be free to set their own rules, without interference from
external people or groups. It was also stated that all decisions must be made
collectively, as one participant asserted, “If you are going to commit to something,
then you need to consider what the rest of the people in the group have to say”.
The researcher found it interesting that the crèche owners were describing the
importance of the stokvel group being self-managed, which is the same idea that
underpins the SaveAct model, which is based on self selection, total transparency and
self management by the group.
4.2.2 Group members must agree on the purpose of the stokvel
During both the individual interviews and focus group discussion, it came through
very strongly that the guiding principle for the crèche stokvel should be passion for
ECD. All the participants agreed that they would want to work with people ‘who
share the same values’ only. When pressed by the researcher to elaborate on what
those values were, the participants mentioned criteria such as a “passion for children”
or “passion for what they do” and “people whose intentions are true or pure”.
It was unanimously agreed that the purpose of the stokvel should be to uplift crèches
in the community. Therefore, all money raised should go into the running or
infrastructure of the crèche. One owner said that it would be important that all
proceeds were invested back into the crèche because she wanted “to see them
[crèches] grow. They need their standards raised,” she explained. The rest of the
Copyright UCT
46
group echoed this sentiment. It was agreed that part of the mandate of the stokvel
would be to ensure that progress was made towards reaching standards and norms set
out by the different departments and that the ultimate goal would be to get all crèches
within a stokvel registered.
4.2.3 Financial benefit for members
The primary reason for the crèche stokvel to exist would be to allow the individual
crèche owners to gain access to large sums of money that they would not be able to
raise on their own. All participants acknowledged that stokvels were a great
mechanism for ‘forced’ savings that would allow members to achieve things they
could not achieve on their own. When asked to elaborate on the benefits of ‘forced’
saving, one respondent exclaimed, “… because you can’t have R10 000, you can’t
[…] but then you get together with other women; they help you save.”
The participants further stipulated that monthly contributions needed to be capped at a
level affordable to all group members. One pointed out that unaffordable
contributions could create problems in the group, while another indicated that
affordability would be a significant determinant for her joining a stokvel. She
lamented: “I’m struggling [financially] at the moment, so that would hamper me.”
In order to make the returns more attractive, the participants agreed that the stokvel
should lend out some of its proceeds and charge interest on the loans. However,
members should not be allowed to borrow more than what they’d contributed.
Participants referred to this as “security”.
4.2.4 Stringent oversight
All participants were of the view that the group would need to exert stringent rules
and ways of working that would ensure that there was oversight and accountability.
This would entail all members attending compulsory stokvel meetings with
“penalties” being imposed on absent members. One spoke of the importance of
attending each meeting and stated, “If you can’t make a meeting you must phone and
let the people know.” Another’s view was more strongly articulated when she added,
“and it’s strict – you must come to the meeting. If you didn’t come to the meeting you
must give us maybe R50 or R20 or something. You have to come to the meeting.”
Copyright UCT
47
The group must monitor members closely to ensure that money is spent as agreed. In
her interview, one respondent stated that it would be important to visit other member
crèches in order to “keep my eye on them […] have you done the things you were
talking about?” The other participants agreed that site visits would be key in ensuring
adherence to the stipulations of the stokvel ‘constitution’.
It was stated further that the group should evaluate the performance of members
against specific outcomes. One respondent sketched the following example: “If you
said that you are going to buy this cabinet, if we give you our money – you have to.”
The participants indicated that such stringent oversight was necessary in order to hold
members accountable to the group. As one opined: “When it comes to the stokvel,
there is no story, you have to give the ladies their money, raining or not.” Another
respondent expressed the same view during her interview, stating: “There can be no
excuse when it comes to the time for contributions.”
Any deviation or noncompliance should result in penalties and eventually expulsion
from the group.
4.2.5 Must be about more than just money
Nearly every study participant brought up the notion that a stokvel must provide more
than “just money.” One respondent suggested that the only way to unlock value in
groups was to provide “mentorship, support and advice”. Another, an NGO worker,
added that they had found that successful groups included “additional training in
other aspects of their lives…” as part of their stokvels.
The crèche owners stressed that the stokvel should provide a platform to “share
things” and “discuss things and learn from each other”. They seemed to view the
stokvel as an opportunity to build something that was not just about the money. One
creches owner described it as having a group of people who help each other or ‘have
each other’s backs’. Her explanation, “uyakwazi ukufihla umqolo womunye” directly
translates as, “you are able to hide another’s exposed back”. Another crèche owner
expressed her expectation of a stokvel as a place where “you get to know people
better. You become like a family.”
Copyright UCT
48
It seemed important to each respondent that the stokvel be a vehicle used to improve
the state of education and care in ECD; with a focus on assisting non-registered
facilities. Respondents often referred to “meeting standards” or “helping them
[crèches] reach standards.”
When asked to elaborate on the type of support they thought the stokvel should offer,
the crèche owners listed helping each other navigate the challenges faced by the ECD
sector, sharing of best practice, computer training and assistance with navigating the
DSD registration process.
4.2.6 High levels of trust amongst members
High levels of trust amongst members was highlighted as being critical to the success
of a crèche stokvel. This came through in all interactions that the researcher had with
the participants. A common refrain uttered by crèche owners was, “You need people
that you know.” In responding to a question regarding the selection criteria, one
crèche owner said, “I would choose people that I have a good relationship with.”
This view was shared by another owner who indicated that in choosing the group, “for
a start, it has to be people you know.”
Most respondents agreed that transparency was crucial to building trust. All but one
of the crèche owners agreed that all information pertaining to the stokvel and the
respective crèches should be available to members. One respondent stressed that in
order to make the stokvel work “there’s nothing to hide […] we have to give all the
information … you give the books”. Another agreed that complete transparency was
necessary. “I would tell them everything. Because in a stokvel, you trust one
another,” she said.
One respondent, an NGO worker, emphasised the importance of every member
knowing exactly what the status of the stokvel was at every moment. One crèche
owner disagreed with the prevalent view that full disclosure and transparency was
necessary for the success of the stokvel. She felt that a more cautious approach was
required because one could never be absolutely certain of the trustworthiness of
individuals; she stated: “I cannot talk about money to the group. It’s not possible that
everyone is trustworthy, even in a stokvel. You can have your person that you speak
to. Not all of them.”
Copyright UCT
49
These divergent views could be present a possible area of conflict, as in response to
the earlier statement in the focus group, another owner indicated that she would not
form a group with any individuals who withheld information. “There are those people
who don’t want to talk about their crèches. I would not have them in my group,” she
said.
The crèche owners also indicated that they would only choose members with a proven
track record. In naming the criteria for new members, “they must have started
something”, was on each crèche owner’s list.
The crèche owners were asked about the ideal group size for a stokvel. They all
seemed to think that it would be preferable to keep the group small, as it would
become more difficult to maintain trust and oversight of a bigger group. There
seemed to be consensus that a group of five crèches would be ideal. One of the NGO
workers was of a similar view, saying that in an urban setting where social ties were
not as strong as in the rural areas, he would suggest keeping the group small with
between 6 to 12 crèches.
4.2.7 Must be easy to administer
The crèche stokvel must be something that is easy to administer and run. Crèche
owners are currently inundated with paperwork, administration and other duties that
are involved in the running of their facilities. In order for a stokvel system to be easily
adopted, it must not significantly add to the burden they already carry. This is not so
much a finding as a recommendation by the researcher based on her experiences and
observations in the crèche environment.
Conclusion
The findings have highlighted various characteristics of the crèche organisation. All
of the crèches in the study exhibited high levels of social capital. Their social
connectedness seems to be valued above the commercial viability of the enterprises.
Although the crèche organisations are plagued with issues such as low levels of
education among owners and teachers, poor infrastructure and lacking access to
services, they are willing to collaborate in order to improve their circumstances.
Copyright UCT
50
All of the study participants thought that collaboration through a stokvel model would
suit these organisations well. There was consensus that any collaboration through a
stokvel mechanism would have to be defined within tight boundaries. All though
there were some nuanced differences between the participants regarding the exact
parameters of the ‘crèche stokvel’, there were a few components that were
unanimously agreed on. These parameters included the following: (1) autonomy of
the group, (2) members must share a common purpose, (3) stokvel must provide
financial returns, (4) the group must have stringent oversight over members, (5) the
group must provide other forms of support and (5) there must be high levels of trust
between members.
Figure 3: Critical components of a crèche stokvel
Copyright UCT
51
Section 5: Discussion
This section presents the qualitative characteristics of SSEs; including ways in which
crèches are similar to informal, survivalist businesses; it defines the SSE; discusses
suitable financing mechanisms for SSEs; and attempts to correlate the needs and
characteristics of crèches with three types of financing models, namely, microfinance,
cooperatives and informal savings groups as typified by stokvels. It presents the key
elements of an SSE stokvel model and draws pertinent conclusions based on the data
mined from study participants.
Qualitative characteristics of SSEs
Crèches seem to typify the average informal, survivalist enterprise in many of the
ways described by literature. Godfrey (2013) and Ligthelm (2006) have found that
informal, survivalist businesses are generally created out of the owner’s need to
escape poverty and not because of a clearly defined market opportunity. All of the
crèche owners in this study reported that they had started their enterprise due to a lack
of job opportunities. Each of the crèche owners clarified that they had chosen the
crèche business specifically in response to the urgent need they witnessed amongst
the children living in their communities. The researcher was particularly interested to
note this finding: that although poverty alleviation ignited the idea of creating an
enterprise, it was the delivery of the social benefit that drove the operation of each
crèche owner or operator surveyed. This reversal or inversion of business focus has
not previously been covered by literature. In this respect, the crèche shares the
characteristics of an NGO. It is owing to this duality in form and function that the
researcher coined the term Social Services Enterprise to describe such organisations.
Godfrey (2013) found that informal businesses were very often unregistered and were
therefore unregulated. The findings of this study report the same pattern, in that three
out of the five crèches were not registered with any official body and therefore there
was no oversight or regulation over their activities. The two registered crèches were
faced with onerous regulatory requirements and stipulations with which they made
great effort to comply. However, neither had the capacity to fully carry out each
regulatory requirement as stipulated. Government bodies tasked with overseeing the
Copyright UCT
52
activities of the ECD environment seemed to pay but cursory oversight and appeared
to lack the rigor to be effective.
All of the facilities that were part of the study were survivalist and struggled to
generate adequate income to support the owners and their families. This was
consistent with the conclusions drawn by Mbonyane and Ladzani (2012) who stated
that informal businesses “fail with regard to financial management” (p. 557.)
Despite the failure to generate satisfactory levels of income for their owners, crèches
provide significant levels of employment. Skinner (2006) listed businesses that
provide employment for personnel other than the owners and highlighted that 82% of
crèches have additional staff, compared with 26% of hairdressing salons, for example.
The three crèches that formed part of this study were a good illustration of this. The
smallest crèche had three members of staff and the largest had nine members of staff,
all in addition to the respective owners. This finding supports the assertion made by
Ligthelm (2005) that although informal enterprises might not be registered, their
commercial activities made a significant contribution to the country’s GDP.
All of the crèche owners in the sample expressed a desire to grow their businesses.
However, outside of attracting increased numbers of paying customers, which would
in turn exacerbate the extensive overcrowding, the respondents each reported that
they had no other avenues to attract the financial resources needed to drive expansion.
As highlighted by Preisendorfer, Bitx and Bezuidenhout (2012), this conundrum was
not unique to crèche owners, but was general to most informal, survivalist businesses.
Skinner (2006) and Mbonyane and Ladzani (2001) argued that owners of informal,
survivalist businesses lacked the required technical and managerial skills to
effectively run their enterprises. Crèches are no different in this regard. All of the
owners professed to very low levels of education and no formal post-school
qualifications, outside of the ECD modules that they were engaged in. Staff members’
levels of education and training were significantly lower than that of the owners. The
crèche owners who participated in this study expressed an awareness of their
shortcomings and intimated that they would be interested in furthering their education
levels since they had an idea of how additional education and training would enhance
Copyright UCT
53
the functioning of their crèches. Yet, none had any knowledge about free and relevant
training courses and where to access them.
Poor infrastructure, lack of basic services and inconsistent service delivery places
significant constraints on informal businesses. Ligthelm (2005) and Skinner (2006)
maintained that issues such as crumbling roads, limited access to water and electricity
affected survivalist business in ways that were detrimental to their sustainability. The
lack of services and poor infrastructure means that owners of informal businesses
have to travel, at great cost, outside of their area of work to access services such as the
internet, printing and faxing facilities. These considerations severely hamper the
services they provide and drastically increase the costs of running their businesses.
All of these issues were observed as impacting the enterprises that formed part of the
study. All of the facilities were located far from business centres; owners and staff
often had to travel substantial distances to access the internet, to make photocopies of
documents and to procure supplies needed for their crèches. The study participants
bemoaned the costs of travel; particularly, the time travelling took away from
business-related issues.
Skinner (2006) asserted that a lack of strong networks amongst informal businesses
resulted in fragmentation and isolation that increased the cost of accessing
information and as a result, the cost of doing business. This assertion holds true in the
case of crèches, but not completely. These enterprises appeared to exhibit strong
industry networks. None of the study participants reported any feeling of isolation,
rather the converse was true, as a sense of connectedness and camaraderie seemed to
exist amongst crèche owners.
However, these networks appeared to be used for the purpose of emotional and social
support and were underutilised commercially. This underutilisation proved to increase
the cost of accessing reliable information. For example, many crèches have had to
deal with the strenuous and gruelling process of registration with DSD. Yet there
existed no formal or anecdotal “help guides” for ease of reference, though countless
crèches within the broader South African context, within the community under study
and two participants in the group, had already undergone the registration process. As
a result, misinformation, confusion and anxiety surrounded the registration process.
Copyright UCT
54
Respondents reported feeling bewildered and out of their depths when attempting to
decipher the requirements for registration.
This study confirmed the many ways in which crèches might be considered to be
informal, survivalist businesses as defined by the literature. These similarities are
summarised below.
Ways in which crèches are similar to informal, survivalist businesses:
Created to escape poverty
Largely unregistered and unregulated
Do not generate enough income to fully support owners and their families
Provide employment and a contribution to GDP
Lack access to financial resources
Owners lack business skills and training
Poor infrastructure and lack of service places severe constraints on activities
Underutilisation of networks for commercial purposes
Defining the Social Service Enterprise
However, crèches differ in certain critical ways to traditional, informal, survivalist
enterprises. These differences and nuances were determined from the study findings
and had not been identified nor addressed in the literature relating to informal,
survivalist businesses.
Although informal, survivalist businesses are started out of necessity, to escape
poverty; at their core they are driven and sustained by a profit motive. The same
criteria appeared to be inapplicable to the crèche environment. The owners might
have started the business out of necessity, but they viewed their enterprises, not as
profit-generating organisations, but as social service delivery organisations that were
able to support their households as well. This sentiment was repeatedly echoed by
each of the owners with statements such as: “We collect them [poor children] at least
Copyright UCT
55
here they can get that lunch and the snacks.” Or, “As long as the children’s needs are
met … then you keep on going.”
Comments such as these highlighted key differentials between crèches and purely
survivalist businesses. They provided clues to a hybrid organisation, one that is
neither an NGO nor a purely commercial enterprise but a Social Service Enterprise.
Owners of such enterprises work towards not only the betterment of their individual
organisations, but are active in improving conditions for the industry as a whole. The
crèche owners who participated in the study were either actively involved in helping
other facilities, because as they claimed, “They need their standards raised.” Or they
were actively receiving assistance from a nearby crèche. The researcher learned that
any excess resources accrued by SSE organisations were distributed to organisations
in a worse off position. The owners of the SSE felt unentitled to amass any excess
resources for themselves, particularly if another organisation was in need.
As with typical businesses, SSEs charge fees for their services, although, only to
those who can afford to pay. Those who are too poor to pay for their services are not
cast out; rather they are brought in and supported. The SSE seems to be a mechanism
for distributing incomes and effectively reducing inequality. Those who have the
means, subsidise those who do not.
Within the context of the urban township environment, characterised by high
unemployment, crime and poverty, SSEs view themselves as custodians of social
good and utilise any resources and social capital that the owners and operators of
crèches have at their disposal to advance societal aims. In the case of crèches, the
societal aim is the wellbeing, development and education of children. This notion of
working towards the good of society was articulated by one of the crèche owners
when she remarked: “We had to take in more children, because we said we were
helping the community.”
Due to this perception of their being custodians for the advancement of social good,
many crèche owners in densely populated, low-income areas, as typified by the urban
township of Khayelitsha in this study, find it very hard to turn children away. This
might serve to explain the issues with overcrowding that many crèche owners in this
study faced.
Copyright UCT
56
Suitable financing models for SSEs
Although SSEs may seem to be typical informal, survivalist enterprises, their social
connectedness and social orientation means that they have needs that are vastly
different to that of commercial enterprises. Nor do SSEs fit the standard definition of
an NGO as SSEs are privately-owned and have customers who pay to receive a
service. Therefore the needs of an SSE are vastly different to that of a pure NGO.
Traditional mechanisms for accessing resources, both in terms of networks, and
access to finance, have not been successfully utilised by SSEs. The researcher
speculates that traditional models and instruments for assisting informal, survivalist
businesses have been inappropriate for SSEs because they have assumed that the
needs of the SSE are the same as those of the purely commercial or non-governmental
enterprises (i.e. grow market share, attain economies of scale, profit maximisation or
effective donor engagement for funding etc.). Banking institutions for example, grant
loans to qualifying enterprises based on their performance measured by profit
generation or anticipated return on investment. As evidenced by the research
respondents, SSEs measure their performance by their ability to serve the children
within their communities. Traditional financing instruments have not taken into
account the deeply embedded social service aspects and the social connectedness of
these organisations.
Microfinance
On one hand, Microfinance institutions, in particular the successful Grameen bank in
Bangladesh, have been effective in turning the global spotlight on the importance of
achieving financial inclusion for the poor (United Nations, 2014). However, these
institutions come with attendant risks to poor people because of their high transaction
costs and reckless lending rates, making them an unsuitable vehicle to provide
informal businesses access to credit. These practises by microfinance institutions have
resulted in increasing indebtedness, which as illustrated by Volschenk and Biekpe
(2003), has left many households and informal businesses worse off.
Microfinance institutions have done poorly for informal businesses, but they have
been completely ill-equipped and inept at servicing SSEs. The owners and operators
Copyright UCT
57
of SSEs often do not have the necessary documentation to enable them to apply for
credit or loans.
Most microfinance institutions are situated far from the urban township environment
in which many SSE owners live and operate. Travelling to the institution is often
onerous and once there, many SSE owners lack the necessary education levels to
enable them to understand the complex contractual stipulations of agreements.
Furthermore, microfinance institutions are viewed as corporate entities, which cannot
be attributed or connected to any one individual. This is at odds with the need for
social connectedness that SSEs seem to share. This lack of a personal relationship or
connection to the corporate entity means that owners and individuals feel no duty
towards the microfinance institution and are thus less inclined to honour payment
terms.
Cooperatives
Cooperatives on the other hand, have been utilised successfully by a number of
farming communities in South Africa to overcome market system failures. Although
their successes have been limited, where cooperatives have worked, they have helped
informal enterprises lower the costs of doing business. Participating enterprises have
been able to leverage their bargaining and purchasing powers. The success of
cooperatives has been in their ability to harness the social capital that is within the
communities. Wanyama et al. (2009) defined cooperatives in SA as being more akin
to “social movements” (p. 367).
However, even with their strong social orientation, cooperatives are not well-suited to
SSEs. Cooperatives are heavily regulated (Wanyama et al., 2009), and come with
onerous legislative requirements that make them difficult to manage. Given that SSEs
already face burdensome regulations and that they are largely owned by individuals
who lack training and technical skills, it is fathomable that organising around a
cooperative framework is neither desirable nor effective.
Stokvels
Copyright UCT
58
The notion of informal savings groups has been around for hundreds of years as a
mechanism for achieving financial inclusion for people in low-income economies. In
South Africa, stokvels are a very common savings and credit extension vehicle with
an estimated 50% of black adults belonging to one or more stokvel groups (Irving,
2005, Verhoef, 2001b).
All of the crèche owners in this study had been part of a stokvel group in the last 12
months. Each of them understood the concept very well and attributed many of their
material financial successes to the stokvel. One of the owners reportedly bought his
first car using proceeds from a stokvel; another told the researchers that she used the
stokvel pay-out to complete the building of her home. This supports the findings from
literature that state that stokvels are a significant industry, currently estimated to be
worth R45.1 billion (Old Mutual, 2014). In a similar way, SSEs do not only provide
income for their owners, they also provide employment, in numbers greater than most
informal businesses.
The participants described stokvels as being more than just about finances; they
iterated that the stokvel group provided emotional and physical support to members.
Irving (2005) linked the foundations for this support amongst members to the
turbulent times of apartheid when neighbours banded together to look after each
other’s families should one of them be imprisoned.
Karlan (2007) argued that stokvels were underpinned by the deep, social connections
that exist within the groups. This characterisation of stokvels mirrors how SSEs view
themselves. The crèche owners see their enterprises as being more than a vehicle for
generating an income, but as a delivery mechanism for social good. As with the
stokvel, crèche owners provide a social net for the most vulnerable members of their
communities.
Literature tells us that successful stokvel groups have high levels of trust and loyalty
amongst members (Shale, 2003; Verhof, 2001a), and that members tend to live within
close proximity to one another. In much the same way, SSEs as embodied by crèches,
exhibit high levels of trust amongst the owners and operators. Those in this study
often referred to visiting one another and helping each other with any problems they
faced. Their responses iterated both the bonds that they shared, and that they operated
Copyright UCT
59
in relative proximity to one another. Living in close proximity of group members,
greatly reduces transactional costs of stokvels (Buijs, 1998); likewise, crèche owners
living and working in close proximity of one another can reduce the cost of acquiring
information.
Stokvels are not regulated. Each group administers its affairs simply and in a
transparent manner (Shale, 2013). Every member, irrespective of education level,
understands the administration of the group; all reports are read out in meetings and
monetary contributions are counted in the presence of each member (Mashigo &
Schoeman, 2012). Although, not quite to the same extent, all the crèche owners
involved in this study ran their enterprises in the same, completely transparent
manner. One owner commented, “There is nothing to hide […] we are used to giving
out our information.” The sharing of information within a trusted group appears to be
another shared characteristic between SSEs and stokvels.
Stokvels seem to share many of the characteristics that define social services
enterprises. They both operate in high trust environments that are underpinned by
transparency and rich social capital. Both models are driven by the need to provide a
social net to the marginalised within their communities. Moreover, they both provide
financial benefits – the stokvel to its members, and the social service enterprise to its
owners and employees.
Table 6: Comparing the characteristics of a crèche to those of financing models
Crèche
Characteristics
Microfinance Cooperatives Stokvel
Transparency ✗ ✗ ✔
High trust ✗ ✗ ✔
Social capital ✗ ✔ ✔
Provides social net ✗ ✗ ✔
Financial benefits ✔ ✔ ✔
Copyright UCT
60
Given these correlations, the researcher postulates that the stokvel model will best suit
the needs of an SSE. Co-opting the model will provide individual SSEs with easier
access to much needed financial resources, while at the same time drawing on the rich
social capital that exists within these enterprises. The stokvel mechanism has at its
core a social focus, rather than a financial one. This is congruent with how SSEs
perceive themselves.
Stokvels are known for their high adherence rates (Irving, 2005) and low default rates.
Members do not act outside of the rules set by the group. Any payments due to the
group are paid promptly. The strong social ties are what ensure strict compliance by
members. The cost of being expelled from the group is too high for any one
individual to risk breaching the constitution.
Given that SSEs have exhibited that they have strong social ties, that they have trust
capital, and that they seem to share a common purpose, it stands to reason that
organising through a stokvel offers such enterprises the best chance of accessing
resources while maintaining their focus on the social good.
Elements of a SSE stokvel
During individual interviews and within a focus group discussion, the participants of
this study were asked to describe possible ways in which an SSE stokvel could be
structured.
Their responses outlined a structure that has all of the same characteristics of a
‘normal’ stokvel as defined by their previous experiences in stokvel groups and as
defined by literature. Most of the characteristics and parameters described by the
participants, such as autonomy, shared purpose, trust, etc. (refer to figure 3), were not
about the financial benefits that can be derived from pooling resources, but around the
social-relational aspect of the model. This was in line with the findings of Shale
(2013) and Vermaak (2000) who asserted that successful stokvels were founded
primarily on the principles of “Ubuntu”, which are about respect, reciprocity and
caring for one another. The participants stressed that the SSE stokvel would have to
be “more than just about the money”.
Copyright UCT
61
Arko-Achemfour (2012) proposed that the power of stokvels might be better
harnessed if the proceeds were used for income-generating activities rather than for
consumption. The study participants shared this view. All stated that in order to
achieve sustainable results from a SSE stokvel, the member enterprises would have to
include in their stokvel constitution, a requirement that all proceeds would be spent on
strengthening their enterprises, and not on private consumption. This was stated as
having a ‘shared purpose’ for the stokvel.
The participants stressed the importance of regular meetings and stringent oversight
by the members of the SSE stokvel group. The researcher inferred from these
strictures as stated by the study participants, that it might be by these means that
groups hold members to account, and by so doing, increase the likelihood of
adherence to the conditions listed in the SSE stokvel constitution. Irving (2005) as
well as Mashigo and Schoeman (2012) recognised that close personal relationships
amongst members facilitated increased loyalty and made it possible for groups to hold
one another accountable; the frequent meetings suggested by the participants would
enable this to take place.
Conclusion
This study has highlighted the dual characteristics of SSEs that make them similar to
both informal, survivalist businesses and NGOs. Traditional mechanisms of granting
financial inclusion, such as microfinance and cooperatives were discussed and found
to be inadequate in delivering on the needs of SSEs. The stokvel framework,
however, was shown to share many of the same features as SSEs and therefore how it
may be the best model to give SSEs access to financing while advancing their social
purpose. The owners and operators of SSEs not only demonstrated that they had a
deep understanding of the advantages of stokvels, but that they also appreciated how
this model might benefit their enterprises if deployed in a disciplined manner. If
employed, the stokvel model would not be something foreign or out of place within
the context of SSEs.
Copyright UCT
62
Section 6: Conclusions
For generations, stokvels and other forms of informal savings groups have been used
by low-income communities to pool resources and mitigate risks. The success rates of
these savings groups have been astounding, with the South African stokvel industry
currently estimated to be worth R45.1 billion (Old Mutual, 2014). Successful groups
span the gamut of income brackets and geographical locations. Groups have
flourished in impoverished rural areas, where communities are faced with adverse
socioeconomic and infrastructural environments. While in similar or better resourced
environmental contexts, informal businesses fail to thrive. Several models in addition
to stokvels have been attempted to achieve financial inclusion for the poor and for
informal businesses. However, these mechanisms, such as microfinance and
cooperatives have not been very effective at bringing about sustained stability and
growth.
This study sought to explore whether the familiar stokvel model might be better suited
to informal, survivalist businesses than any other mechanism as a means for such
businesses to access necessary financial resources, pool resources and spread risk.
The findings of this study quickly revealed significant, nuanced differences amongst
informal, survivalist businesses. The ECD environment, in which the study took
place, showed that crèche owners did not view their businesses as purely commercial
enterprises that provide an important service to their customers, but rather as private
enterprises that deliver social services to their communities. The sense of community
and the shared custodianship of social good were found to be more important than
profit generation for the participants. This led the researcher to conclude that crèches
and other types of informal businesses such as traditional healers and churches, which
in essence served the needs of the community, should not be treated like other
enterprises whose main motivation is profit maximisation. Their hybrid nature makes
them Social Services Enterprises.
Given the hybrid nature of SSEs, it became clearer why mechanisms of accessing
financial resources such as microfinance or cooperatives might not be suitable.
Microfinance institutions lacked the social connectedness that owners of SSEs
Copyright UCT
63
believed was the core of their organisations. Cooperatives tended to be complex
structures, with onerous legislative requirements that often required skills that owners
of SSEs did not possess.
Conversely, the stokvel model was shown to share numerous similar aspects to SSEs:
they both satisfy social needs; both are built on the embedded social capital of
communities; the groups have high trust amongst members and transaction costs
associated with membership are low. Organising SSEs through stokvels can therefore
be the most appropriate mechanism to provide these organisations with access to
much needed financing. Owners of SSEs are likely to be or have been part of a
stokvel in their individual capacity, and can therefore easily identify with its
structures. It is for this reason that SSE stokvels must be run along similar structures
to normal stokvels; but in order to ensure that the objective of building capacity is
met, the requirement that proceeds are to be used to build capacity within the member
enterprises and not for private consumption, should be stipulated.
This model will build on the strong social capital and entrenched networks that
already exist in regard to SSEs. Adoption of the model will be organic since many
owners of SSEs are familiar with the stokvel model and the model is one that is fully
integrated with the nature of SSEs. It is therefore the model most appropriate to
facilitate the organisation, collaborative efforts and capacity building within SSE
organisations.
While it must be noted that the stokvels will not provide the highest financial returns
when compared with mainstream financial instruments, they will, however still fulfil
the key requirements of SSEs who place social good at the core of what they do and
who measure their success based on their impact in their communities.
Future research
Stokvels function on the basis of high levels of trust and social capital. The potential
of the SSE stokvel model is predicated on the high social capital that exists within the
crèche environment. Future research should focus on exploring the possibilities of
adapting the stokvel model to other industries where social networks are not as strong
or entrenched, such as the taxi industry.
Copyright UCT
64
Section 7: References
African Response Research. (2012). Stokvels - A hidden economy: Unpacking the
potential of South African traditional saving scheme. African Response
Research. (Unpublished paper). Johannesburg, SA. Retrieved from
http://www.africanresponse.co.za/PressReleases/Documents/2012StokvelHidden
Economy.pdf
Anderson, L. M., Shinn, C., Fullilove, M. T., Scrimshaw, S. C., Fielding, J. E.,
Normand, J., & Carande-Kulis, V. G. (2003). The effectiveness of early
childhood development programs. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
24(3), 32–46. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00655-4
Arko-Achemfour, A. (2012). Financing SMMEs in rural South Africa: An exploratory
study of the Stokvels in the Naledi local municipality, North West Province. In
N. Esther & T. Mazwai (Eds.), Working Papers: The third annual international
conference Growing Industries in Townships (pp. 121–35). Johannesburg:
Centre for Small Business Development of the University of Johannesburg.
Bank Seta. (2013). The microfinance review 2013 “From microfinance to financial
inclusion”: A review of the South African microfinance sector. Trends,
successes, challenges and policy issues. Pretoria, SA: University of Pretoria.
Retrieved from http://www.bankseta.org.za/downloads/BANKSETA
Microfinance Review Report 2013.................pdf
Baumann, T. (2004). Pro-poor microcredit in South Africa: cost-efficiency and
productivity of South African pro-poor microfinance institutions. Development
Southern Africa, 21(5), 785–798. doi:10.1080/0376835042000325705
Beesley, A., & Ballard, R. (2013). Cookie cutter cooperatives in the KwaZulu-Natal
school nutrition programme. Development Southern Africa, 30(2), 250–261.
doi:10.1080/0376835X.2013.801195
Biggart, N. (2001). Banking on each other: The situational logic of rotating savings
and credit associations. Advances in Qualitative Organization Research, 3, 129–
153. Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/245580479_Banking_on_Each_Other_
The_Situational_Logic_of_Rotating_Savings_and_Credit_Associations/file/72e7
e529faacaf0feb.pdf
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods (3rd ed.). New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Buijs, G. (1998). Savings and loan clubs: Risky ventures or good business practice? A
study of the importance of rotating savings and credit associations for poor
women. Development Southern Africa, 15(1), 55–65.
doi:10.1080/03768359808439995
Copyright UCT
65
Burger, K. (2010). How does early childhood care and education affect cognitive
development? An international review of the effects of early interventions for
children from different social backgrounds. Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 25(2), 140–165. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.11.001
Casson, M., & Giusta, M. Della. (2004). The costly business of trust. Development
Policy Review, 22(3), 321–342.
Centre for Inclusive Banking in Africa. (2011). The state of microenterprise finance
in South Africa 2011. Pretoria, SA: University of Pretoria. Retrieved from
http://www.thedti.gov.za/sme_development/sumit/The State of Micro-enterprise
Finance in South Africa Ms Barba.pdf
City of Cape Town. (2013).2011 Census Suburb: Khayelitsha [map].1:44,000.
Retrived from
http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/stats/2011CensusSuburbs/2011_Census_CT_Su
burb_Khayelitsha_Profile.pdf
Coetzee, G. (2005). Centre for micro-finance: Providing finance for the poor.
Management Today Yearbook, 62.
Department of Trade and Industry. (2012). Integrated strategy on the development
and promotion of co-operatives. Pretoria, SA: Government Printer. Retrieved
from
http://www.dti.gov.za/economic_empowerment/docs/coops/legis_policy/coop-
strategy.pdf
De Vaus, D.A. (2001). Research Design in Social Research. London: Sage
Publications.
Dodici, B. J., Draper, D. C., & Peterson, C. A. (2003). Early parent child interactions
and early literacy development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
23(3), 124–136. doi:10.1177/02711214030230030301
Eldering, L., & Leseman, P. (Eds.). (1993). Early intervention and culture:
Preparation for literacy. The interface between theory and practice. Netherlands
National Commission for UNESCO: UNESCO Publishing.
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Foster, M. a., Lambert, R., Abbott-Shim, M., McCarty, F., & Franze, S. (2005). A
model of home learning environment and social risk factors in relation to
children’s emergent literacy and social outcomes. Early Childhood Research
Quarterly, 20(1), 13–36. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2005.01.006
Godfrey, P. C. (2013). Toward a theory of the informal economy. The Academy of
Management Annals, 5(1), 231–277. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.585818
Copyright UCT
66
Gugerty, M. (2007). You can’t save alone: Commitment in rotating savings and credit
associations in Kenya. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55, 251–
282. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/508716
Hardy, K., & Magrath, A. (1987). Buying groups: Clout for small business. Harvard
Business Review, 65(5), 16–24.
Hietalahti, J., & Linden, M. (2006). Socio-economic impacts of microfinance and
repayment performance: A case study of the Small Enterprise Foundation, South
Africa. Progress in Development Studies, 6(3), 201–210.
doi:10.1191/1464993406ps138oa
Irving, M. (2005). Informal savings groups in South Africa: Investing in social
capital. (No. 112) CSSR Working Paper, University of Cape Town. Retrieved
from http://www.cssr.uct.ac.za/index.html
Karlan, D. S. (2007). Social connections and group banking. The Economic Journal,
117(517), F52–F84. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02015.x
Lahimer, N., Dash, S., & Zaiter, M. (2013). Does micro finance promote
entrepreneurship and innovation? A macro analysis. African Journal of Science,
Technology, Innovation and Development, 5(1), 19–29.
Ligthelm, A. (2005). Informal retailing through home-based micro-enterprises: The
role of spaza shops. Development Southern Africa, 22(2), 199–214.
doi:10.1080/03768350500163030
Ligthelm, A. (2006). Size estimate of the informal sector in South Africa. Southern
African Business Review, 10(2), 32–52. Retrieved from
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/sabr_v10_n2_a3
Ligthelm, A. (2008). A targeted approach to informal business development: The
entrepreneurial route. Development Southern Africa, 25(4), 367–382.
doi:10.1080/03768350802316138
Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Mashigo, P., & Schoeman, C. (2012). Stokvels as an instrument and channel to extend
credit to poor households in South Africa. Journal of Economics and Financial
Sciences, 5(1), 49–61.
Mbonyane, B., & Ladzani, W. (2011). Factors that hinder the growth of small
businesses in South African townships. European Business Review, 23(6), 550–
560. doi:10.1108/09555341111175390
Mukorombindo, Y., & Coetzee, J. (2013). A better life through networks and support?
Vulnerable people living in a new human settlement in Grahamstown. Africanus,
43(1), 49–64. Retrieved from
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/canus_v43_n1_a5
Copyright UCT
67
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations, Spring, 145–162.
Retrieved from
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Muller, C., & Posel, D. (2004). Concerns with measuring informal sector
employment: An analysis of national household surveys in South Africa. The
Econometrics Journal, 28(1), 1993–2001.
Naong, M. N. (2009). Stokvels: A possible panacea for fostering a savings culture?
Journal for New Generation Sciences, 7(2), 248–266.
Neverson, K. S. (2013). Book Review: Microfinance: Perils and prospects by Jude L.
Fernado (ed.). African Review of Economics and Finance, 4(2), 305–310.
Okem, A., & Lawrence, R. (2014). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of
network formation for cooperatives in South Africa. KCA Journal of Business
Management, 5(1), 16–33. Retrieved from
http://www.ajol.info/index.php/kjbm/article/view/103096
Old Mutual. (2014). Savings and investment monitor July 2014. Cape Town, SA: Old
Mutual. Retrieved from
http://www.oldmutual.co.za/documents/Savingsmonitor/2014/SIM_Presentation
_2014.pdf
Pelaez, A., Yu, M. Y., & Lang, K. R. (2013). Social buying: The effects of group size
and communication on buyer performance. International Journal of Electronic
Commerce, 18(2), 127–157. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415180205
Prahalad, C., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard
Business Review, 80(9), 48–59. Retrieved from
http://www.ima.kth.se/utb/MJ2693/pdf/serving.pdf
Preisendörfer, P., Bitz, A., & Bezuidenhout, F. J. (2012). Business start-ups and their
prospects of success in South African townships. South African Review of
Sociology, 43(3), 3–23. doi:10.1080/21528586.2012.727542
Pryor, B. F. L. (1983). The economics of production cooperatives: A reader’s guide.
Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 54(2), 133–172.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.1983.tb01866.x
Rogerson, C. M. (1996). Urban poverty and the informal economy in South Africa’s
economic heartland. Environment and Urbanization, 8(1), 167–179.
doi:10.1177/095624789600800115
September, R. (2009). An audit of early childhood development facilities in the
Western Cape. (Report) Department of Social Development Western Cape
Provincial Government.
Shale, M. (2013). Of culture and religion: Insurance regulation and the informal
economy in a South African city. In T. Borzel & R. Hamann (Eds.), Business
Copyright UCT
68
and Climate Change Governance (pp. 173–192). Cape Town, SA: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Shiferaw, B., Obare, G., & Muricho, G. (2008). Rural market imperfections and the
role of institutions in collective action to improve markets for the poor. Natural
Resources Forum, 32(1), 25–38. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2008.00167.x
Skinner, C. (2006). Falling though the policy gaps? Evidence from the informal
economy in Durban, South Africa. Urban Forum, 17(2), 125–148.
doi:10.1007/s12132-006-0002-y
Slade, K. (2014, May 14). Latest stats on Stokvels released (News release). African
Response. Johannesburg. Retrieved from
http://www.africanresponse.co.za/PressReleases/2014LatestStatsStokvelsRelease
d.aspx
Spaull, N. (2013). South Africa’s education crisis: The quality of education in South
Africa 1994–2011 (Vol. 27). Report commissioned by Centre for Development
& Enterprise, October. Retrieved from http://www.section27.org.za/wp-
content/uploads/2013/10/Spaull-2013-CDE-report-South-Africas-Education-
Crisis.pdf
Thorp, R., Stewart, F., & Heyer, A. (2005). When and how far is group formation a
route out of chronic poverty? World Development, 33(6), 907–920.
doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.016
UNICEF. (2005). National integrated plan for early childhood development 2005-
2010. Pretoria, SA: Unicef. Retrieved from
http://www.unicef.org/southafrica/SAF_resources_nip.pdf
United Nations. (2014). The Millennium Development Goals report. New York, NY:
UN. Retrieved from
http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/MDG/english/UNDP MDG
Report 2014 EN Final.pdf
Urban-Econ Development Economists. (2009). Kwazulu-Natal cooperatives
development strategy (Draft for discussion). Durban, SA: Department of
Economic Development and Tourism. Retrieved from
http://www.kznded.gov.za/Portals/0/KZN Coop Report Revised and updated 27-
11-2009 _2_ _2_.pdf
Valodia, I. (2013). Bringing the informal economy into the National Development
Plan. Social Dynamics, 39(1), 115–118. doi:10.1080/02533952.2013.777559
Verhoef, G. (2001a). Informal financial service institutions for survival: African
women and stokvels in urban South Africa, 1930–1998. Enterprise and Society,
1983, 40–42.
Copyright UCT
69
Verhoef, G. (2001b). Savings and survival in a modern African economy: Informal
savings organisations and poor people in South Africa. Historia, 8, November,
519–42.
Vermaak, N. (2000). Indicators for indigenous financial efforts: Theory, evidence and
prospects. Africanus, 30(2), 38–49. Retrieved from
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication_article/canus_v30_n2_a4
Volschenk, J., & Biekpe, N. (2003). A comparative study of different segments in the
South African lending industry. South African Journal of Business Management,
34(1), 13–20. Retrieved from
http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/access/electronic_journals/busman/busman_v
34_n1_a2.pdf
Wanyama, F., Develtere, P., & Pollet, I. (2009). Reinventing the wheel? African
cooperatives in a liberalized economic environment. Annals of Public and
Cooperative Economics, 80(3), 361–392. Retrieved from
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00390.x/full
Woodward, D., Rolfe, R., Ligthelm, A., & Guimarães, P. (2011). The viability of
informal microenterprise in South Africa. Journal of Developmental
Entrepreneurship, 16(01), 65–86. doi:10.1142/S1084946711001719
Yu, D. (2012). Defining and measuring informal employment in South Africa.
Development Southern Africa, 29(1), 157–175.
doi:10.1080/0376835X.2012.645649
Zamagni, S. (2010). What is a cooperative? German Cooperative and Raiffeisen
Confederation, DGRV suppl, 2. doi:10.4337/9781849805667.00007
Copyright UCT
70
Section 8: Appendices
Appendix 1 Schedule of interviews and observations
Date Type of Interaction Name Organisation Address
10-09-2014 Semi-structured interview LR Entrepreneur (township) Khayelitsha
18-09-2014 Semi-structured interview SL ECD NGO Claremont
19-09-2014 Semi-structured interview AK Group Savings NGO Pietermaritzburg, KZN
22-09-2014 Participant Observation T Crèche Khayelitsha
30-09-2014 Participant Observation ZV Crèche Khayelitsha
09-10-2014 Participant Observation JP Crèche Khayelitsha
24-10-2014 Semi-structured interview TM Crèche
24-10-2014 Semi-structured interview ZV Crèche
24-10-2014 Semi-structured interview JP Crèche
24-10-2014 Focus Group JP, TM and ZV Conducted in Khayelitsha
17-11-2014 Semi-structured interview NZ Crèche Khayelitsha
17-11-2014 Semi-structured interview PT Crèche Khayelitsha
19-11-2014 Participant Observation NZ Crèche
21-11-2014 Participant Observation PT Crèche
Copyright UCT
71
Appendix 2 Semi-structured interview questions
Questions: OWNER SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
1. Are you part of a stokvel?
2. How long have you been part of the stokvel?
3. Tell me about what the stokvel has helped you achieve?
4. Please describe to me how your stokvel works?
5. What is the best part about being part of a stokvel? Please give examples.
6. Tell me about some of the challenges you face in your business?
7. Can you think of what/who could help you deal with these challenges?
8. Do you know any other crèche owners in your community?
a. Are you in touch with them?
b. Please describe your relationship with them?
9. Who do you seek business advice from?
10. Do you think that some of the things that work in your stokvel could work for your
business? Please give examples.
11. Would you be willing to be part of a business stokvel?
12. What would stop you or make you uncomfortable about joining a business stokvel?
13. If you could start a business stokvel, tell me how would design it?
a. Describe what it would be like?
b. Which crèche owners would you ask to join?
14. A stokvel requires a lot of commitment, trust and transparency from members in
order to make it work – would you be willing to share the following with other crèche
owners?
a. Best practice/advice
b. Financial information
c. Commit to monthly or quarterly meetings
15. From your experience as a crèche owner and as a member of a stokvel, do you think
it is possible for crèche owners to create stokvel for their businesses?
16. What would need to be in place or happen for something like this to work?
17. What would need to happen for something like this to fail?
18. Any questions that you feel I have missed? Or other insights you wish to share with
me?
Copyright UCT
72
Appendix 3 Focus group discussion questions
Guiding Questions: FOCUS GROUP
1. If you got a large sum of money (R20 000) that you had to use in the crèche, what
would you do with it?
2. We have spoken about Stokvels for crèches – what do you think of this idea, and
why?
3. Do you think the crèche owners in this area forum would be able to work together in
a crèche stokvel? Why?
4. What would you need to see or have happen before you joined a crèche stokvel?
5. If you were in charge of starting a crèche stokvel, tell me the 5 criteria (or rules) you
would have for someone who wanted to join you? How would you choose your
members?
6. If you were I charge of putting together the constitution of this stokvel, what rules or
guidelines would you include in it.
7. What kinds of things do you think would be important to spend the crèche stokvel
money on?
8. Stokvels generally hold monthly meetings. Crèche stokvels would have the same, but
during the meetings there would be a “formal sharing / learning session”. What types
of things do you think would be important to know more about or learn about or have
training on, during these sharing/learning sessions?
9. If you were giving advice to people staring a stokvel for their business, what would
you tell them?
10. Is there anything else that you would like to discuss relating to crèche stokvels?