Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education...

22
Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

description

Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services. Shelby County, AL February 23-24, 2009. William McInerney, Ph.D. Laurie Dinnebeil, Ph.D. University of Toledo Judith Herb College of Education. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education...

Page 1: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research Evidence to Support the

Consultation Model in Itinerant Early

Childhood Special Education Services

Page 2: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Shelby County, ALFebruary 23-24, 2009

William McInerney, Ph.D. Laurie Dinnebeil, Ph.D. University of ToledoJudith Herb College of Education

Page 3: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Distributed Instruction vs. Massed Instruction…… The Spacing Effect

What It Is and Why It Should Matter to Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Professionals

Page 4: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research and Development Support

Margie Spino, M.A.Doctoral Student - U. Toledo

Page 5: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Consultation vs. One-to-One and Small Group Instruction in Itinerant ECSE Services This is the primary consideration in current

IECSE practice. Which is the more efficient approach to teaching?

• The adoption of a consultation model as the primary mode of intervention in IECSE services must be based on efficiency of instruction vs. traditional patterns of practice

Page 6: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Rationale for Consultation / Coaching in IECSE Services If periodic or episodic intervention (usually 60-90 minutes

per week in traditional IECSE service delivery) is as efficient as distributed or spaced instruction (or practice), then there is no need to adopt a consultation model as the primary mode of intervention, however……

• If distributed, or spaced instruction or practice, is a more efficient model of learning, then adoption of a consultation approach to IECSE intervention is warranted

Page 7: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Rationale for Consultation / Coaching in IECSE Services

If consultation is to be considered as a preferred alternative to 60-90 minute, one-to-one or teacher-directed small group instruction, then the research base related to efficiency of child learning must be examined

Page 8: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

What is the Spacing Effect? The tendency for spaced (distributed)

teaching to yield much better learning than massed teaching sessions

Examples of Spaced Practice or Teaching In 1 day: Study 2 hours, break, study 2 hours,

break Across days: Study on Mon, Tues, Wed

Example of Massed Practice “Cramming”

Page 9: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

What is Interstudy Interval (ISI)?

The interval separating different study or practice episodes of the same materials

In most studies are at least 2 study or practice episodes separated by an ISI

Example: Study 2 hr, ½ hr break, Study 2 hr Means ISI = ½ hour

Page 10: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research with Adults - 1Donovan & Radosevich, 1999 Reviewed 63 studies involving acquisition of a skill or

information with adults

Results:

Distributed practice was significantly superior to massed practice

Page 11: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research with Adults - 2

Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted & Rohrer, 2006 Reviewed 317 studies of verbal memory

tasks with children and adults Results:

Spaced learning of items consistently showed benefits over massed learning

Longer Interstudy Intervals (ISI) benefited learning

Most studies showed children do better with spaced practice

Page 12: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research with Children - 1Rea and Modigliani,1985 3rd graders (8.5 years) taught spelling words

and math facts Students ranked as Level 1 (top half of class) or

Level 2 (bottom half of class) Results:

Better on spelling and math tests with spaced practice rather than massed practice

Spaced practice was better for BOTH Level 1 and 2 students (ability level didn’t matter)

Page 13: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research with Children - 2

Seabrook, Brown & Solity, 2005 Participants ranged from 5-yr olds to undergrads

Experiment 1 Task: Ss saw a list of words (3- and 4-letter concrete

nouns) and then were given a recall test. Schedule: Words were presented for study with

massed practice or spaced/distributed practice. Results: All age groups benefited from increasing

spaced practice

Page 14: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Seabrook, Brown & Solity, 2005 Experiment 2

Task: recognize words previously seen on a list under conditions that more closely resembled a classroom

Schedule: massed condition = one word was presented 4 times in

a row. clustered (an intermediate condition) = one word was

presented 2x in a row, followed by 8 intervening items, then an additional 2 consecutive presentations of word.

distributed condition = 1 word was presented 4 times, with 4 intervening items between each presentation.

Page 15: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Seabrook, Brown & Solity, 2005 Experiment 2 Results

distributed condition produced significantly better results on the test than either the clustered or massed conditions

the clustered condition resulted in performance that was not any better than in the massed condition

these results held for both the children and the adults; there were no significant differences in performance between children and adults

Page 16: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Seabrook, Brown & Solity, 2005 Experiment 3

Task: 34 children (mean age 5 years.6 mos.) taught phonics over 2 weeks

Schedule: Clustered or Massed = one, 6-minute session per day

within a regular classroom setting. Distributed = three, 2-minute sessions per day within a

regular classroom setting Results: Children in distributed condition had test

scores 6 times greater than children in clustered condition

Page 17: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Research with Children - 3Childers and Tomasello, 2002 How many times (and how many days) does

a 2-yr old need to hear a word to learn it? In 2 experiments, 2 yr olds were taught novel

nouns and verbs over course of one month in sessions lasting 5 - 10 min Noun = “This is a wuggy.” Verb = “It’s dacking. See? It dacks.”

Page 18: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Childers and Tomasello, 2002Experiment 1 Results:

• Best learning occurred when practice was distributed over 4 days regardless of number of intervening days

• Children learned words better if they heard word 1x/day for 4 days rather than 8x/day for I day

Page 19: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Childers and Tomasello, 2002 Experiment 2

only nouns 4 exposures to a new word in 1 day varied the number of days children heard the new

words 1 to 4 days

Varied number of intervening days (ISI) between when children last heard the new word 1, 2, 5 or 10 intervening days

Page 20: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Childers and Tomasello, 2002 Experiment 2 Results

The more days children heard the words, the better able they were to learn the words Best = 4 days, 3 days Worst = 1 day, 2 days

The number of intervening days (ISI) did not matter and was not helpful. Children did poorly with 1, 2, 5 and 10 intervening

days.

Page 21: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Major Findings Spacing (distributing) practices benefited

children and adults whether tasks were physical or conceptual.

Spacing practice within the day (e.g., three 2-min sessions/day) or across days (e.g., 1x/day for 4 days) benefited children’s learning.

Page 22: Research Evidence to Support the Consultation Model in Itinerant Early Childhood Special Education Services

Implications for Education Practice

Current laws state that educational practice needs to be research-based (NCLB; IDEIA, 2004)

How should we schedule instruction for young children? Massed vs Spaced ? Research supports

Spaced How should we schedule the Itinerant SPED

teacher’s time? Direct Instruction or Consultation / Coaching?

Research suggests Consultation/Coaching