resdesigns

download resdesigns

of 22

Transcript of resdesigns

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    1/22

    Types of Research Designs

    Exploratory Research (huh?)

    Designed to generate basic knowledge, clarify relevant issuesuncover variables associated with a problem, uncover informationneeds, and/or define alternatives for addressing researchobjectives.

    A very flexible, open-ended process.

    Descriptive Research (who, what, where, how)

    Designed to provide further insight into the research problem bydescribing the variables of interest.

    Can be used for profiling, defining, segmentation, estimating,predicting, and examining associative relationships.

    Causal Research (If-then)

    Designed to provide information on potential cause-and-effectrelationships.

    Most practical in marketing to talk about associations or impact ofone variable on another.

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    2/22

    Types and Characteristics of Exploratory Studies

    Literature Search

    Conceptual literature

    Trade literature

    Published statistics

    Library homepage (www.uah.edu/library)

    Analysis of Selected Cases

    Intensive study of related cases or past activities

    May be internal or external

    Can help provide clues as to how other units orcompanies have dealt with similar issues

    http://www.uah.edu/libraryhttp://www.uah.edu/library
  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    3/22

    Types and Characteristics of Exploratory Studies

    Experience Surveys (a.k.a., depth interviews)

    Knowledgeable people with varying points of view

    Unstructured and informal interviews

    Respondent free to choose issues to be discussed

    Focus Groups

    8 to 10 people at one time

    Relatively homogeneous groups

    Multiple, heterogeneous groups

    Group dynamics

    Moderator is key

    Relies on general topical guide with plenty of time forinteraction

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    4/22

    The Growing Role of Focus Groups

    Goal of focus group research: learn and understandwhat people have to say and why.

    Find out how participants feel about a product,concept, idea, organization, etc.;

    How it fit into their lives;

    Their emotional involvement with it

    May be conducted alone or as part of a broaderproject

    May be use to define issues or to confirm findingsfrom survey research.

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    5/22

    Requirements for Focus Groups

    Good group of information-rich participants How many people? How many groups? Characteristics of participants

    Discussion guide and outline Ground rules Agenda Guiding questions

    Qualified Moderator Controls flow Stimulates discussion

    Analysis and Report

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    6/22

    Good Moderator Characteristics

    Must be able to break down barriers; get subjects to open up within

    first 10 minutes

    Must be a quick learner

    Good listener

    Absorb content

    Gauge personalities Adapt quickly

    Must be in control, but not dominating (guide rather than lead)

    Must appear to be neither an expert nor naive

    Must be flexible to allow for free flow of discussion Dont concentrate too rigidly on the moderator guide

    Keep the big picture in perspective

    Know what is important

    When to move on

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    7/22

    Facilitating Group Dynamics Use a introductions to set the tone

    Use only first names in introductions Avoid job titles and positions, unless necessary State your purpose and establish position as an objective,

    unbiased party Encourage everyone to participate; no right or wrong

    answers Use an ice breaker to get everyone comfortable State ground rules, procedural details Ask for permission to tape if possible

    Ensure confidentiality/anonymity Report to contain summary of group, not individuals

    Use write-down method to allow for both introverts andextroverts to have input, and to lock people into their ownopinions (avoids too much group think)

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    8/22

    Handling Problems in the Focus Group

    Confusing Concept or Discussion Topic

    Break the concept into components that are easier to understand Use the confusion as a discussion point (ask for their

    interpretation, then attempt to resolve)

    Dead Subject (no discussion initiative)

    Play one person off the other.

    Use projective techniquesWhat color do you most closely associate with . ? Why?

    What animal does ______ remind you of? Why?

    What type of people might use? Why?

    Lively Subject (everyone talking, often at once)

    Assert leadership role and take charge Promise more discussion time later

    Suggest that everyone wants to hear all opinions, which is easierdone one at a time

    Use write-down techniques to quiet the group down

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    9/22

    Handling Problems in the Focus Group (contd)

    The Talkative Member Leverage his/her energy to you benefit

    Ask the rest of the group to respond to (agree/disagree with) what

    the talkative member said

    Call on someone else specifically when asking questions

    Say, Dont let Ed do all the talking, Id like to hear fromsomeone else.

    Silent Members

    Call on them by name (John, how do you feel about)

    Reinforce the value of their responses Do this several times in a row and they will open up voluntarily

    Probe their short answers for more detailed ones

    Tell me more about

    That is interesting, why do you feel that way/

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    10/22

    The Moderator/Discussion Guide

    Purpose is threefold:

    Outline flow of discussion

    Defines issues

    Sets ground rules

    Provides time constraints

    Provides information for participants

    Serves as a guide for the final report

    May be very basic or extremely detailed depending on formality of the

    research. Very exploratory research will require a simple guide

    More extensive analyses need more structure

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    11/22

    Contents of The Discussion Guide

    Introductory Statements (typically 10-15 minutes)

    Moderator introduction

    Respondent introductions

    Objectives/Statement of Purpose

    Ground rules

    Key Discussion Questions (45-50 minutes) Practice using multiple types of questions to elicit more detailed responses

    Think about the purpose of your questions:

    Collect information?

    Maintain flow?

    Lead respondent? Wrap-up

    Clarify, Verify, Summarize

    Ask All things considered type questions to get them to summarize

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    12/22

    Thoughts on Discussion Questions

    Begin with simple, easy to answer questions Place more specific, sensitive questions toward the mid-point in the

    discussion

    Dont want to force them to work too hard early or scare them

    Ensure that questions are short and deal with a single issue

    Utilize vocabulary that is consistent with the respondents

    Include questions that the respondents would reasonably have

    knowledge of and ability to answer

    Remember to keep the tone of the questions conversational, not

    accusational, confrontational, or critical of individuals

    Dont ask questions that would potentially single one person out for

    inspection

    Be cautious about giving examples (might lead too much)

    Use parallel or similar questions to test commitment to positions

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    13/22

    Activities to Engage Participants

    List generation

    Ranking or evaluating items

    May be abstract ideas or concrete objects

    Sentence completion

    Creating analogies

    Picture or word sort Create a collage of your feelings

    Drawing a picture or ideal image

    Role playing or enactment

    Personal experiences

    Hypotheticals

    Divide group for debate

    Monitor and follow-up on Nonverbals

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    14/22

    What is Included in Typical Reports

    Depends on type of report desired

    Most focus group reports are designed to answer thefollowing questions: What was the purpose of the study?

    What were the research objectives?

    What methodology was used, and why?

    What was the group composition?

    What were the key findings?

    As a result, what are the recommendations?

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    15/22

    Techniques for Summarizing Findings

    Identifying comments that are frequently mentioned Evaluating rankings or "votes" occurring over the course of the project Grouping similar responses by meaningful subgroups (for instance, mentions by

    region, age group, or company size) Resolving differences between groups Discussing messages with opposing ideas indicated perhaps by body language

    To ensure accurate evaluation of focus group reports, keep in mind several rules ofthumb:

    Avoid quantifying results; remember this is qualitative analysis. Look for patterns that show consistent themes It is important to provide quotations to support your evaluations. Identify which thoughts were generated through a free-flowing discussion and

    which were actually aided responses.

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    16/22

    On-line Focus Groups

    Advantages

    No geographic barriers

    Lower costs Fast turnaround time

    Do not have to see a moderator face-to-face

    Can reach hard-to-reach managers

    Two way interaction between moderator and the client ispossible

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    17/22

    On-line Focus Groups

    Disadvantages

    Group dynamics are construed

    Nonverbal inputs are minimal

    Client involvement with participants is practically non-existent

    Security - who is the person on-line?

    Attention to the topic - is the participant paying attention?

    Exposure to external stimuli - can not present productprototypes.

    Or can we?

    Role and skill of moderator are more difficult

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    18/22

    Depth Interviews

    One-on-one interviews that probe and elicit detailed answers to

    questions, often using nondirective techniques to uncoverhidden motivations.

    Advantages

    No group pressure

    Respondent is focus of attention and feels important

    Respondent is highly aware and active

    Long time period encourages revealing new information

    Can probe to reveal feelings and motivations

    Discussion is flexible and can explore tangential issues

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    19/22

    Depth Interviews

    Disadvantages

    Much more expensive than focus groups

    Do not get the same degree of client involvement; clients

    do not want to observe single interviews Are physically exhausting for the moderatorreduces

    the number of people that can be interviewed in a given

    time period.

    Moderators do not have other group members to helpobtain reactions and to stimulate discussion.

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    20/22

    Types and Characteristics of Descriptive Studies

    Cross-Sectional Study

    Easily the most common type of research project.

    Typically involves conducting a survey of a sample of population

    elements at one point in time.

    Useful because it provides a quick snapshot of whats going on

    with the variables of interest for our research problem. Longitudinal Study

    An investigation that involves taking repeated measures over time.

    Useful for conducting trend analysis, tracking changes in behavior

    over time (e.g., brand switching, levels of awareness, turnover)

    and monitoring long-term effects of marketing activities (e.g.,market share, pricing effects)

    True panel vs. omnibus panel

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    21/22

    Causal Research Designs

    Evidence to Support Causation

    Concomitant variation

    If X is supposed to cause Y, then the two variables must move together.

    If one variable changes, we should observe a resulting change in the

    other.

    Time order of occurrence

    If X is supposed to cause Y, then changes in X must precede changes in

    Y.

    Elimination of other possible causes

    If X causes Y, no other factor could have reasonably caused the change

    in Y at that moment.

    Must hold all other variables constant.

  • 8/3/2019 resdesigns

    22/22

    Causal Research Designs

    Experiments are the best way to satisfy elements of causation.

    May beField ExperimentorLaboratory Experiment

    Tradeoff between realism versus control

    Examples of experimentation in marketing

    Market test (test marketing)

    Advertising response (recall, affect, attitude toward ad elements)

    Promotional design (consumer response to promotional deals,

    incentives, tie-ins

    Store layout and design

    Product positioning

    Color tracking and package design