Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009
description
Transcript of Requirements Way Ahead 24 August 2009
Requirements
Way Ahead24 August 2009
Joint Training RequirementJoint Training Requirement
Characteristics:– Identified by a COCOM, Evaluated by a Service Component,
Supported by a Service Headquarters, then Validated by the submitting COCOM
– Directed by Higher-level guidance:• Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 1322.18 – Military Training• Guidance for Development of the Force (GDF)• Guidance for the Employment of the Force (GEF)• CJCS High Interest Training Issues (HITIs)• COCOM Theater Campaign & Training Plans• Joint Training Plan High Interest Training Requirements (HITRs)
– Requirements shall be framed in terms of Joint Mission Essential Tasks (JMETs) and should address documented readiness issues in the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS)
– May address training from tactical to strategic
RR
COCOMCOCOM
ServiceServiceHQHQ
ServiceServiceCompComp
Definition: The intersection of a COCOM’s, Service Component’s, and a Service Headquarters’s training needs linked directly to authoritative higher-level guidance
• Requirement: Conduct integrated theater missile detection and defensive operations
• Submitters:• COCOM – USNORTHCOM (and others)• Service Component – ARSTRAT (and others)• Service HQ – USN (and others)
• Linkage to Higher Level Guidance:• GDF – Prevent Hostile States and Non-State Actors from Acquiring or Using WMD• CJCS HITI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction• USNORTHCOM HITR – NORAD Aerospace Control and Warning Operations• DRRS Readiness Shortfall – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations
• Applicable Mission Essential Task:• NORTHCOM
• SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities• ST 6.1.7 – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations
• ARSTRAT• SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities
• Navy• TA 3.2.7 – Conduct Air and Missile Defense Operations• OP 6.1 – Provide Operational Air, Space, and Missile Defense
• Level of War: Strategic, Operational, and Tactical
Example
Cut in T2$ prevents USN from
adequately training
TA 3.2.7
ImpactNORTHCOM
unable to execute ST 6.1.7
Front End Analysis
begins outside of JNTC
Business CaseBusiness Case
Front End Analysis
Supported COCOM
Supporting – JWFC Training Development
Community of Interest
COCOMs
Services
Agencies
Requirement
JNTC Process
Prioritization based on e.g. # stakeholders # tasks affected transition plan ROI
Solution Identification
Resourcing
Solution Development
Validation
Fully integrated?
Does it met requirement?
Training Development JNTC
Transition to Training Program
Feedback
R
COCOM
SHQSC
Accreditation and CertificationWay Ahead
24 August 2009
Improved Accreditation/Certification ProcessImproved Accreditation/Certification Process
• Accreditation now prescriptive in nature– Programs and tasks selected by the JWFC based on COCOM and COCOM
Component training needs– Accreditation schedule will largely focus on re-looks of accredited programs
• Adds new tasks that align with the most current training requirements/guidance
• TD decisions and activities based on rigorous front-end analysis of validated training requirements. – Accomplished outside of the JNTC requirements process
• Accreditation/Certification issues remain responsibility of programs– A/C issues not JWFC problems to solve
• Mitigation backlog resolved– Issues analyzed and returned with few exceptions
Accreditation ProcessAccreditation Process
Commander, JWFC approves prioritized
list of UJTs
JWFC selects programs & tasksfor Accreditation based
on prioritized UJTs
Shortfall Assessment to Program
RR
COCOMCOCOM
ServiceServiceHQHQ
ServiceServiceCompComp
RR
COCOMCOCOM
ServiceServiceHQHQ
ServiceServiceCompCompProgram Decides
Which A/C Issues to Pursue as Requirements
CJCS: HITIsCOCOMs: HITRs
(Front-end Analysis)
RR
COCOMCOCOM
ServiceServiceHQHQ
ServiceServiceCompComp
RR
COCOMCOCOM
ServiceServiceHQHQ
ServiceServiceCompComp
Execute Accreditation
Based on Elements of Joint Context
Example Tasks and Programs for Accreditation
Air/Missile Defense• ST 6.1.7 Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations
- NORTHCOM• OP 6.5.4 Secure Air, Land, and Sea Lines of Communications (LOCs) in JOA
- BF, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR
IO/Cyber• OP 5.6.1 Integrate Operational Information Operations
- BF, MAGTF TC, FST, JTFEX, JRTC, NTC, JMRC
Joint Fires• OP 3.2.7 Synchronize Operational Firepower
- FST, JTFEX, AWF, BF, VF, GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR, MAGTF TC
CIED• TA 6.9/OP 6.2.2.1 Conduct Counter Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Operations
- BF, GF-E, GF-W, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, MSTP, JMRC
IW• OP 1.2.8 Conduct Joint Urban Operations
- GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, BCTP, USAREUR, JKCE
24
Emerald Warrior
15Solution Identified
(Not Resourced)
11
Open
5
Not in Mitigation
Not in Mitigation
Solution Identified
(Not Resourced)OthersOpen
Solution Implemented(Resourced)
767 *Total A/C issues
334Complete(Archived)
Issues Way AheadIssues Way Ahead
379 – Returned To Program* 54 - Retained
55 – Reviewed High Potential Issues
Benefits of Accreditation/CertificationBenefits of Accreditation/Certification
• Validates Joint Training based on elements of Joint Context– Supports COCOM/COCOM Component war fighting requirements
• PBR’s to address A/C shortfalls will still score higher
• Accreditation earns program a ticket to participate in JTCP
• Positive impact on BRAC process for Installations with resident JNTC Accredited Training Programs and Certified sites
• Certification ensures adherence to Joint technical standards– Improves interoperability
Accreditation/Certification Way AheadAccreditation/Certification Way Ahead
• Conduct front-end analysis to focus Accreditation on COCOM & COCOM Component Requirements
• Selection of Training Programs and Tasks to be accredited based on this front-end analysis
• A/C outcome is a shortfall assessment provided to the program that is eligible to enter into TD requirements process once the shortfall becomes a valid requirement
• Legacy issues returned to programs
Back Up Slides
Challenge OverviewChallenge Overview
• Accreditation process had flaws that needed to be reworked
• Issues and activities were not based on a valid, relevant front end analysis
• A/C issues automatically became JWFC problems to solve
• Huge backlog prevented agility in execution
BenefitsBenefits
• Repairs structural flaws in process while retaining favorable aspects and visibility on joint training issues
• Focuses our efforts and improves linkages to Warfighter joint training priorities
• Improves fiscal accountability and effectiveness • Allows immediate reengagement with customers
and stakeholders to minimizes loss of trust
AssumptionsAssumptions
• Every “Requirement” JWFC Takes On To Solve Must Always:– Come through the COCOM-Service Component-Service vetting– Have documented basis in high level guidance and nested tasks– Be framed in terms of JMETs
• Core Capabilities Are Continuously Maintained:– Configuration management process– Developed IAW roadmaps and architectures
• Process Must Be Agile To Meet All Challenges– Some flexibility and judgment must be applied to each situation– Process procedures used are variable and situation dependent– The same parties have an interest throughout the process although the lead and
the main effort change periodically – An Integrated Product Team approach is indicated (Community of Interest)
Excellence IdentifiedExcellence Identified
The and for Joint Training The and for Joint Training
CY10 New Program Accreditation CY10 New Program Accreditation
Example: Program Not Yet Accredited
HITIs and HITRs• Irregular Warfare• Joint Intelligence• Joint Fires• Dynamic Targeting• TTP to Defeat IEDs• Strategic Communications• Information Operations• Cyberspace Operations• Personnel Recovery• Combat ID• Airspace Management• Combating WMD• Theater Air & Missile Defense• Unified Actions• Stability Operations• Maritime Interception Operations• Other
Services / USSOCOM Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task
• Venue: MARSOC Raven Training Program (29-Palms)
• Training Audience: MARSOC units
Corresponding UJTL Tasks
Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements Division and approved by CDR JWFC
•(U) OP 4.7.7 Conduct Foreign Internal Defense (FID) https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2837
CY10 New Task Accreditation CY10 New Task Accreditation
Example: Program Already Accredited (New Task)
HITIs and HITRs• Irregular Warfare• Joint Intelligence• Joint Fires• Dynamic Targeting• TTP to Defeat IEDs• Strategic Communications• Information Operations• Cyberspace Operations• Personnel Recovery• Combat ID• Airspace Management• Combating WMD• Theater Air & Missile Defense• Unified Actions• Stability Operations• Maritime Interception Operations• Other
Services Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task
• Venue: Blue Flag (Hurlburt Field, FL)
• Training Audience: Numbered Air Forces• Combined Air Operations Center• Combined Force Air Component Command• Air Support Element (ASE)
Corresponding UJTL Task
Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements and approved by CDR JWFC
• (U) OP 3.1 Conduct Joint Force Targetinghttps://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2761
Definition: Accreditation
“A determination that a Combatant Command, Service, or component training program or organization has the capability to conduct training on joint tasks thereby providing the training audience a realistic joint environment, that includes the appropriate elements of joint context for the joint tasks, or portions of joint tasks, being trained.”
JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005
Elements of Joint ContextElements of Joint Context
Those forces, control organizations, systems, and supporting infrastructure that make up the joint training environment expected to be encountered in real-world operations for specific universal joint tasks.
THREAT
FEEDBACK
EVENT CONTROL
FORCES
JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP
TRAINER SUPPORT
SYSTEMS
SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT
C2 ORG
THREAT
FEEDBACK
EVENT CONTROL
FORCES
JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP
TRAINER SUPPORT
SYSTEMS
SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT
C2 ORG
Definition: CertificationDefinition: Certification
“A determination that training sites and systems are compliant with specified Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) architectures, configurations, and standards required to create a supportable, realistic joint training environment.”
* In accordance with JNTC Certification CONOPs, 7 Mar 05
Certification Focus AreasCertification Focus Areas
Accreditation and Certification are linked in that certification will make certain that the systems, networks, architectures, etc., needed to produce the required elements of joint context are available, supportable and meet the established joint standards.
OPFOR / SITFOR
ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT
C2 / IM / KML / V / C
INTEGRATION
AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION
PROGRAM MGMT
CONFIG MGMT
INTEGRATED LOG SUPT
Interagency
Partners
Interagency
Partners
Multinational
& Coalition
Partners
Multinational
& Coalition
Partners
Accreditation Certification
THREAT
FEEDBACK
EVENT CONTROL
FORCES
JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP
TRAINER SUPPORT
SYSTEMS
SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT
C2 ORG
OPFOR / SITFOR
ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT
C2 / IM / KML / V / C
INTEGRATION
AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION
PROGRAM MGMT
CONFIG MGMT
INTEGRATED LOG SUPT
THREAT
FEEDBACK
EVENT CONTROL
FORCES
JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP
TRAINER SUPPORT
SYSTEMS
SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT
C2 ORG
OPFOR / SITFOR
ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT
C2 / IM / KML / V / C
INTEGRATION
AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION
PROGRAM MGMT
CONFIG MGMT
INTEGRATED LOG SUPT
Foundation of the Joint Training Environment
What is “Joint Context?”
“The joint environment necessary to accurately and realistically train individuals, units, and organizations on a specific joint task or a portion thereof. It is achieved when all required joint systems, personnel, and equipment to execute the task in real-world operations are present or accurately replicated, realistically exercised, and evaluated.”
JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005