Sample Reports...Sample LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS ä Median Profile ABC Company Strategic...
2
Sample LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISä Median Profile Strategic Directions - Group Report ABC Company Executive Team # of Respondents: 13 Rater Agreement: LOW HIGH HI-MID MID-RANGE LOW-MI D LOW MID-RANGE HIGH LOW- MID HI- MID 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Creating a Vision l Traditional 50 % M l Innovative 80 % M l Technical 30 % M l Self 40 % M l Strategic 99 % H 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Developing Followers l Persuasive 90 % H l Outgoing 10 % H l Excitement 75 % M l Restraint 55 % M 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Implementing the Vision l Structuring 15 % H l Tactical 55 % M l Communication 85 % H l Delegation 80 % M 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Following Through l Control 25 % M l Feedback 55 % H 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Achieving Results l Management Focus 80 % M l Dominant 55 % M l Production 75 % M 10 60 20 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+ Team Playing l Cooperation 40 % M l Consensual 90 % H l Authority 5% H l Empathy 50 % M Copyright © 1994, 1998 Management Research Group® Portland, Maine USA General Europe n=45621 (Jan2012) 51500062
Transcript of Sample Reports...Sample LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS ä Median Profile ABC Company Strategic...
Sample
LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISä
Median ProfileStrategic Directions - Group ReportABC Company
Executive Team
# of Respondents: 13
Rater Agreement:LOW HIGHHI-MIDMID-RANGELOW-MI
D
LOW MID-RANGE HIGHLOW-
MID
HI-
MID
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Creating a Vision
l Traditional 50 % M
l Innovative 80 % M
l Technical 30 % M
l Self 40 % M
lStrategic 99 % H
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Developing Followers
lPersuasive 90 % H
lOutgoing 10 % H
lExcitement 75 % M
lRestraint 55 % M
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Implementing the Vision
lStructuring 15 % H
lTactical 55 % M
lCommunication 85 % H
lDelegation 80 % M
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Following Through
lControl 25 % M
lFeedback 55 % H
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Achieving Results
lManagement Focus 80 % M
lDominant 55 % M
lProduction 75 % M
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Team Playing
lCooperation 40 % M
lConsensual 90 % H
lAuthority 5 % H
lEmpathy 50 % M
Copyright © 1994, 1998 Management Research Group®
Portland, Maine USA
General Europe n=45621 (Jan2012)
51500062
Sample
LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISä
Median/FrequencyStrategic Directions - Group Report
ABC Company Executive Team
# of Respondents: 13
Rater Agreement:LOW HIGHHI-MIDMID-RANGELOW-MI
D
LOW MID-RANGE HIGHLOW-
MID
HI-
MID
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Creating a Vision
Traditional 50 % Ml 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1
Innovative 80 % Ml 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 2
Technical 30 % Ml 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
Self 40 % Ml 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 2
Strategic 99 % Hl 1 1 3 8
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Developing Followers
Persuasive 90 % Hl 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 2
Outgoing 10 % Hl 6 2 1 2 1 1
Excitement 75 % Ml 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2
Restraint 55 % Ml 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Implementing the Vision
Structuring 15 % Hl 4 2 3 2 1 1
Tactical 55 % Ml 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1
Communication 85 % Hl 1 1 1 2 3 2 3
Delegation 80 % Ml 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Following Through
Control 25 % Ml 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Feedback 55 % Hl 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Achieving Results
Management Focus 80 % Ml 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1
Dominant 55 % Ml 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
Production 75 % Ml 1 1 1 1 4 4 1
10 6020 30 40 50 70 80 90 96+
Team Playing
Cooperation 40 % Ml 1 2 2 2 3 1 2
Consensual 90 % Hl 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 2
Authority 5 % Hl 8 1 3 1
Empathy 50 % Ml 1 1 3 4 1 1 2
Copyright © 1994, 1998 Management Research Group®
Portland, Maine USA
General Europe n=45621 (Jan2012)
