Reporting Format for Regional Chairs and NGDOs (Latin ...s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/€¦3...
Transcript of Reporting Format for Regional Chairs and NGDOs (Latin ...s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/€¦3...
Reporting Format for Regional Chairs and NGDOs (Latin America 08/2008 to 12/2008)
1) Indicate the regularity of VISION 2020 programmes in that country.
a) Sustained VISION 2020 activities (twice a year or more) b) Intermittent activities (at least once a year) c) No activity in the recent past (2 years) d) No information available
Note: During the IAPB meeting in Geneva in July 2007, the Caribbean Council for the Blind (CCB) agreed to furnish IAPB with the relevant information for the region, hence in this report, our office has not included information from the Caribbean basin.
S.
Periodicity Launched
Country
VISION
No
No. Regular
Intermittent
activity 2020
1 Argentina a Y
2 Bolivia a Y
3 Brazil a Y
4 Canada a Y
5 Chile a Y
6 Colombia a Y
7 Costa Rica a Y
8 Cuba a Y 9 Dominican
Republic a Y
10 Ecuador a Y
11 El Salvador a Y
12 Guatemala b Y
13 Honduras a Y
14 Mexico a Y
15 Nicaragua a Y
16 Panama b N
17 Paraguay a Y
18 Peru a Y
19 United States a N
20 Uruguay a b Y
21 Venezuela a Y
2) List partners for each of these countries (blank means no data available to the LA office)
Partners
S. N o. Others
IAPB
(Corporate,
Country
Government member
NGDOs Individuals,
Agency (yes/no)
Institutes
etc.) 1 Argentina LIONS, ORBIS, FOAL, Y
CMB Y 2 Bolivia ULLS DEL MON, Y Y
FOAL, CMB, MIRADA SOLIDARIA, LIONS, Light for the World
3 Brazil CBM, FOAL, Y Y Y LIGHTHOUSE, SEE INTERNATIONAL LIONS 4 Canada N Y Y
5 Chile LIONS, FOAL, CMB Y Y
6 Colombia SEE Y Y Y INTERNATIONAL, LIONS, CMB 7 Costa Rica LIONS, CMB, ORBIS, Y Y
FOAL
8 Cuba LIONS, ORBIS, CBM Y Y
9 Dominican CMB, LIGHTHOUSE, Y Y Republic SEE INTERNATIONAL, CMB, LIONS
10 Ecuador CMB, FOAL, MIRADA Y Y SOLIDARIA, LIONS
11 El CBM Y Salvador
12 Guatemala LIONS, FOAL, N Y LIGHTHOUSE, CBM,
ORBIS
13 Honduras CBM, FOAL, SEE N Y INTERNATIONAL 14 Mexico CMB, HELEN Y Y Y KELLER, FOAL,
LIGHTHOUSE, CCB- SSI 15 Nicaragua CMB, FOAL, SEE Y Y INTERNATIONAL
16 Panama SEE N N INTERNATIONAL,
FOAL 17 Paraguay CBM, ORBIS, LIONS, Y Y Y
FOAL
18 Peru SEE Y Y Y INTERNATIONAL,
CMB, FOAL, ORBIS, LIONS
19 United Y Y Y States
20 Uruguay LIONS, CBM Y Y
21 Venezuela CBM, FOAL, LIONS Y Y
3) What VISION 2020 priorities are active in your region? (Check
all that apply) Cataract Trachoma Onchocerciasis Childhood Blindness Refractive Error & Low Vision Diabetic Retinopathy and Glaucoma Other (Specify Regional priorities)
X
X
X
X
4) Areas of focus to promote VISION 2020 priorities in your region: (check all that apply and rank in order of priority)
� Priority
Disease Control 2 Human Resource Development 1 Infrastructure Development 3 Research 4
5) Please list regular programmes taken up in your region.
Describe the nature of activities under such programmes.
S.
Country Nature of Activity Period
No.
1 Argentina Cataract surgery and ROP programmes in 2008 various provinces. Great advances in LV
activities. Hosted the GA8 and III Iberoamerican VISION 2020 Congress as well as the I Argentine Public Health Ophthalmology meeting in August. The SIBEN Congress on ROP was held in Mar del Plata en September. Very successful ROP programs particularly in the South. The Castelli community in the northern province of El Chaco has finished a RACSS and aims to be declared Cataract Blindness Free
2 Bolivia Cataract surgery programmes. Established PBL Committee in June 2008
3 Brazil Great advances in ROP screening and training, 2008 including wider adoption of national guidelines. Many cataract surgical programmes and Diabetic Retinopathy screening and treatments. In Sao Paulo, many refractive errors programs active. Twenty training centres have begun a pilot programme to include CEH in their curricula, Formed CEH and VISION 2020 committee in the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), Refractive Errors screening in school age children, primarily in Sao Paulo. Twenty facilitators trained in in Brazil.
Two CEH courses have taken place in 2008. Follow up of ROP course in November
4 Canada Strong support to developing countries. 2008 5 Chile Great support from the Government for 2008
Cataract, ROP, Diabetic Retinopathy and
X
X
X
X
Refractive errors. CEH concepts have been officially adopted by the National Society of Ophthalmology as part of the training curricula.. All priority V2020 disease and other are guaranteed by government funding.
6 Colombia
Many active Cataract and ROP programmes. Held CEH Planning course in March with MOH authorities as well as an ROP course in February. CEH Course for government institutions took place in the third trimester 2008
7 Costa Rica Cataract, ROP and Refractive Errors. Hosted the Central American ROP Congress 2008
8 Cuba Strong cataract surgical programmes, advances 2008
in Diabetic Retinopathy, LV and ROP. Helps training Human resources for various Caribbean nations
9 Dominican Large cataract surgical programmes, ROP 2008 Republic council has begun activities, Low Vision clinics, Government will start paying for cataract
surgeries as of June 2007. Will commence RAAB study in September. ROP Course held in July. Priority Country report completed. RAAB study conducted in the third quarter
10 Ecuador Long standing with wide coverage ROP 2008 programmes, Many surgical campaigns sponsored by the prevention of blindness society. $US 200,000 allocated to cataract surgeries in 2008 by MoH. CBM Low Vision Advisors meeting. 02/08 11 El Salvador Cataract surgical programmes and outreach as 2008
well as spectacle dispensing. Formed VISION 2020 Committee in June
12 Guatemala Many cataract surgical programmes and 2008 refractive errors services, V2020 Committee has reunited and good conversations with the
government established but not much activity developed. Priority country report completed.
13 Honduras Cataract surgical campaigns and programmes, 2008 currently developing the National PBL Plan.
14 Mexico National cataract surgery training centre established helping further develop cataract surgery programmes and campaigns in 14 2008 states of the country
15 Nicaragua A meeting to reignite the VISION 2020 Committee will be held in late July 2008
plan during WSD 2006 celebrations.
16 Panama Have participated with Four articles for the 2008
V2020 LA quarterly bulletin. Initial conversations to form the VISION 2020 Committee started.
17 Paraguay Many surgical campaigns and regular 2008 programmes, CEH curricula in one residency training programme, ROP screening and treatment programmes.
Will hold First South American Ophthalmology residents meeting in October
Held a Fundraising Course in March in conjunction with CBM and the local partner, Fundacion Vision
III CEH Management Program in November
VISION 2020 PBL Plan officially relaunched and financed by the Government in December. Held the First ever Ophthalmology Residents Meeting of South America (EROCS) with PBL concepts taught by Serge Resnikoff, Colin Cook, Miriam Cano, Fernando Barria, Francisco Contreras, Rainald Duerksen and van Lansingh
18 Peru Many surgical campaigns and regular 2008 programmes established. Improvement in ROP screening in Lima, and some major cities, and developed national
Guidelines. A well established outreach program for refractive errors in children and adults is functioning
Priority Country report completed
19 United States Strong support to developing countries. 2008
20 Uruguay CEH classes being held in the residency training program. 2008
A National referral hospital established late last year
21 Venezuela Many ongoing cataract surgical programmes, 2008 including those operating overseas. Two very good ROP programmes.
Note: GA8 and WSD activities have been reported in a separate form earlier this
year.
6) Please provide a summary of the work in the priority areas in your
region, with regard to HRD & Training, Disease Control, and Infrastructure development and appropriate technology.
HRD and Training status
Three CEH courses took place during the second semester of the year, including the one for residencies in Brazil. *Please see annexes*
Active participation of various technical subcommittee members as well as of Dr. Rainald Duerksen and Van Lansingh in the WOC held in Hong Kong in June 2008. Currently Van Lansingh is working with Miriam Cano, Daksha Patel and Rainald Duerksen to develop the CEH curricula and reading list as well as basis Power presentations to be made available via the ICO website. Additionally Van Lansingh has been appointed to the ICO Refractive Errors task force and as a member of the editorial board of the Official Journal of the Argentine Council of Ophthalmology (CAO). Van Lansingh conducted a project visit on behalf of SSI to Belize and represented Mrs. Pat Ferguson in the annual CCB meeting.
During the reporting period, the following article or guidelines were also published: The priority country reports for Peru, Guatemala and the Dominican Republic have been completed and are available on request in Spanish by writing to [email protected] The Latin-American Guidelines for VISION 2020 Advocacy have been completed and are also available in Spanish or English by writing to [email protected] The August and December VISION 2020 LA quarterly bulletins are available online in three languages by clicking http://www.v2020la.org/bulletin/esp/docs/boletin_13/index.html The July and December edition of the CEHJ in Spanish are available by clicking www.revistasaludocular.org Limburg, H, Barria-VB, F, Gomez, P, Silva, JCS, Foster, A. Review of recent surveys on blindness and visual impairment in Latin America. First seen on line Br. J. Ophthalmol 2008 Three papers have been accepted in peer reviewed journals, as soon as the details are available they will be provided. Disease Control Appropriate Technologies Others
7) Please summarize activities taken up towards resource mobilization in your region.
ALCON has generously agreed to support the Paraguay CEH Management course and will also support the CEHJ in Spanish starting in 2008 *Also supported by the FHF, ORBIS and CBM
ALLERGAN generously sponsored the printing and distribution of the ROP Latin American Guidelines. OEU Continues to generously support the VISION 2020 LA Regional office.
8) List the Vision Rehabilitation and blindness programmes
active in your region under VISION 2020; please also list programme launches.
Note: Those listed here are the ones sponsored by CBM which were provided as a courtesy by both regional offices as well as some from ORBIS, but do not reflect those sponsored by other International NGOs or local agencies, a comprehensive list has been requested to all the NGOs.
Partner Country Location Belize Council for the Visually Impaired BCVI Belize Belize-City ASEMBIS - Asoc. de Servicios Médicos Para El Bien Social Costa Rica San Jose Patronato Nac. De Ciegos, Inc. Centro De Rehab. para Ciegos Dominican Republic Santo Domingo Centro Cristiano de Servicios Médicos, Hospital Dr.E.Santana Dominican Republic Santo Domingo Comité Evangélico Salvadereno de Ayuda y Desarrollo - CESAD El Salvador San Salvador Programa Nacional de Salud Visual (FUDEM) El Salvador San Salvador
PBL Program AGAPE El Salvador Sonsonate PBL Program El Peten Guatemala San Benito
Ciudad de Blindness Prevention in Western Guatemala Guatemala Guatemala
Grace Childrens Hospital Haiti Port-au-Prince Petit Goave Eye Clinic Haiti Petit Goave
Hopital Universite d'Etat d'Haiti (HUEH) Haiti Port-au-Prince Gebeau - Eye Health Services Jeremie Haiti Jeremie
Club de Leones'La Fraternidad' Clinica de Oftalmologia Honduras San Pedro Sula Centro Cristiano De Servicios Médicos Honduras El Progreso
Clinica Oftalmologica Vida Abundante Honduras Tegucigalpa Hospital 'LA CARLOTA' Clinica de Oftalmología Mexico Montemorelos
Asociación Centro de Rehabilitación para Ciegos - ACREC Mexico Cuernavaca Salud Ocular Ciudad Juarez Mexico Ciudad Juarez
Vision 2000 Mexico Manzanillo
Eye Care Service Oaxaca Mexico Tlacolula Luz y Vida Chilapa Mexico Chilapa Prevention of Blindness Project Tabasco Mexico Cunduacan Clinica Hospital del Pueblo Anna Seethaler, San Martín A.C. Mexico Mexicapan PBL Baja California Mexico Ensenada Clínica de Ojos - Jinotega Nicaragua Jinotega
Country City Director Ophthalmologist
Argentina Tartagal Claudia Lungu Dr. Juan Carlos Gutierrez
Dr. Carlos Argentina Córdoba Carranza Dr. Carlos Carranza Dr. Jorge Argentina Castelli Kleisinger Dr. Jorge Kleisinger Argentina La Plata Dra. Marta Galán Dra. Marta Galán
Argentina Córdoba Dr. Julio Urrets Dr. Julio Urrets Bs. Aires, La María Eugenia Argentina Rioja Nano
Bolivia Santa Cruz Milton Salvatierra Dr. José Justiniano Bolivia El Alto Yascara Murguia Dr. Rogelio Patti Bolivia Santa Cruz Thomas Dietze Dr. Orlando Torricos Dra. Carmen Bolivia Cochabamba Camargo Dr. Edgar Barrionuevo Dr. Gustavo Bolivia Tarija Aguirre P. Dr. Gustavo Aguirre U.
Dr. Pinheiro, Dr. Ronald &
Nely Carvalho, Dra. Brazil Santarem Janette Ryan Saldanha, Dr Ribeiro Dr. Gloria Brazil Mananhão Vasconcelos Dr. Gloria Vasconcelos Brazil Recife Dr. Liana Ventura Manfred GoebelMaria Conceição da Brazil Cuiaba Encarnação
Chile Concepción Norfa Frez Dr. Raúl González
Dr. Juan José
Colombia Bucaramanga Rey; Isabel Ardila
Cali , Colombia Buenaventura Doris de Botero Dr. Mauricio de Colombia Popayán Rosa Ballén Colombia Pasto Lic. Viviana Díaz Martha Elena Colombia Medellín Betancur Dra. Claudia Durán
Ecuador Portoviejo Yolanda de Avila Ecuador Guayaquil Dr. Eddie Icaza Dr. Eddie Icaza Dr. Felipe Ecuador Yaruquí Chiriboga Dr. Felipe Chiriboga
Ecuador La Libertad Dr. Julio Centeno Dr. Cloro Villamar
Ecuador Loja Dr. Carlos Aguirre Dr. Carlos Aguirre
Dra. Ma del Carmen Dra. Ma del Almeida Dr. Alfonso Ecuador Quito Carmen Almeida Almeida
Ecuador Guayaquil Dr. Eduardo Viteri Dr. Eduardo Viteri
Ecuador Cuenca Raúl Bonifaz Dr. René Cabrera
Ecuador Milagro Dr. Robin Ríos Dr. Robin Ríos Dr. Rainald Paraguay Asunción Duerksen Dr. Rainald Duerksen
Paraguay Asunción Dra. Miriam Cano
Dr. Frilo Silva, Dra. Silvia
Peru Cusco Dr. Frilo Silva Mendoza Dr. Giovanni Peru Arequipa Salas Dr. Giovanni Salas
Dr. Johannes Peru Abancay Kohler Dr. Johannes Kohler
Peru Trujillo Dr. Artemio Burga Dr. Artemio Burga
Peru Piura Dr. Luis Pongo Dr. Luis Pongo
Peru Lima Dra. Luz Gordillo Dra. Luz Gordillo Dra. Maruja Peru Iquitos Limachi Dra. Maruja Limachi Dr. Donald Mejía, Dr. Peru Chachapoyas Dr. José Cajo Francisco Ramos
Peru Lima Dr. Miguel Asmat Dr. Miguel Asmat
Peru Chiclayo Dr. Carlos Labrín Dr. Carlos Labrín Dra. Cecilia Peru Ica Castillo Dra. Cecilia Castillo Peru Trujillo Merly González Merly González Saravia Saravia Dr. Francisco Dr. Francisco Belisario; Venezuela Caracas Belisario Dra. Magally Hernández
Country City Program E-mail [email protected] [email protected] Argentina Tartagal Cataract [email protected] Argentina Córdoba Cataract [email protected] Argentina Castelli Cataract [email protected] Argentina La Plata ROP [email protected]
Argentina Córdoba ROP [email protected] Bs. Aires, La
Argentina Rioja Cataract & ROP [email protected]
[email protected]; Bolivia Santa Cruz Cataract [email protected] Bolivia El Alto Cataract [email protected] Bolivia Santa Cruz Cataract [email protected] [email protected] Bolivia Cochabamba Cataract [email protected]
Bolivia Tarija Cataract [email protected]
Brazil Santarem Cataract [email protected] Brazil Mananhão Cataract [email protected] ROP & Low
Brazil Recife Vision [email protected]
[email protected]; Brazil Cuiaba Cataract [email protected]
Cataract & Low
Chile Concepción vision [email protected]
[email protected] Colombia Bucaramanga Cataract [email protected] Cali , Colombia Buenaventura Cataract [email protected]
Colombia Popayán Cataract [email protected]
Colombia Pasto Cataract [email protected] [email protected] Colombia Medellín Low Vision [email protected]
[email protected] Ecuador Portoviejo Cataract [email protected] Ecuador Guayaquil Cataract [email protected] Ecuador Yaruquí Cataract [email protected] Ecuador La Libertad Cataract [email protected] Ecuador Loja Cataract [email protected]
Ecuador Quito Cataract/ ROP [email protected] Ecuador Guayaquil Cataract [email protected] [email protected] Ecuador Cuenca Cataract [email protected] Cataract, Low Ecuador Milagro Vision [email protected]
rd@conexión.com.py Paraguay Asunción Cataract, ROP [email protected] Cataract, Low [email protected] Paraguay Asunción Vision [email protected] Cataract, Low [email protected] ; Peru Cusco Vision [email protected] Peru Arequipa Cataract [email protected]
[email protected] ; Peru Abancay Cataract [email protected] Peru Trujillo Cataract [email protected] [email protected] ; Peru Piura Cataract [email protected] ROP, Congenital Peru Lima Cataract [email protected] Peru Iquitos Cataract [email protected]
Peru Chachapoyas Cataract [email protected]
Peru Lima Cataract [email protected] [email protected] ; Peru Chiclayo Cataract [email protected] Peru Ica Cataract [email protected] Peru Trujillo [email protected]
[email protected] ; Venezuela Caracas Cataract, ROP [email protected]
9) What are the various advocacy measures implemented in your
region to spread awareness on VISION 2020’s priority areas. Indicate concrete future plans, if any.
Special Number of the CEHJ in Spanish: http://www.revistasaludocular.org/ Regular edition of the December 2008 CEHJ in Spanish:
S. Date
Country Programme /Proposed
No.
date of
Launch
1 Argentina Ongoing meetings with the MOH and National Society of Ophthalmology, so that CEH concepts are included in annual residents meeting, bi-monthly official publication of the National Council of Ophthalmology features a paper related to CEH and one programme.
Low Vision Curriculum for 07/08 Ophthalmologists Forum.
Latin American ROP Workshop. 09/08
III Iberoamerican VISION 2020 08/08 Congress.
I Argentinean Public Health 08/08 Ophthalmology Meeting.
IAPB GA8. 08/08
LARWG annual meeting. 08/08
II Latin American National VISION 2020 08/08 Committees meeting.
2 Bolivia CEH course 05/08
SICS Course 10/08
3 Brazil CEH courses for residency training Second programmes (2) semester 08
National ROP Workshop 11/08
4 Canada
5 Chile
6 Colombia National ROP Workshop 02/08
Committee conveened once again to 04/08 further develop NPBL Plan
CEH Course 04/08
RAAB Study in Barranquilla 08/08
7 Costa Rica Regular monthly meetings of the 08 VISION 2020 committee to promote coordination between agencies and the government in order to establish a
National PBL Plan.
CEH Course 10/08
National ROP Workshop Second semester
LV Training course for optometrists Second semester
8 Cuba
9 Dominican Will conduct a RAAB early 2008 04/08 Republic National ROP Workshop Second semester
10 Ecuador Will conduct RAAB study later in the Second year semester 08
SICS Course Second semester
11 El Salvador Establish National PBL Committee 06/08
12 Guatemala Relaunching on V2020 Committee 10/08 during WSD
Follow up visit as a Priority Country 02/08 along with participation the IEF and Visualiza Sponsored Course
Low Vision Workshop for Central 05/08 America
WHO Regional LV Training Course 11/08
Field Workers primary Eye Care Course Second semester
13 Honduras Presentation of PBL plan during WSD 10/08
CEH Course 10/08
14 Mexico CEH Course took place in Oaxaca and 10/08 RAAB results made available. 08
Ongoing ROP in various districts
15 Nicaragua Workshop with PAHO to update NPBL 08 Plan
Appropriate Technology CEH course Second semester
16 Panama Establish National PBL Committee 08
17 Peru
Follow up RAAB study in the Piura and Second Tumbes Region semester
2009
18 Paraguay Regular ongoing meetings with the 08 Government authorities to launch a campaign of 1000 extra cataract surgeries performed by CONAVIP members.
Cost of blindness and low vision study to start 06/08
CEH Management course 11/08
Quality assurance and Second Procurement/repair of equipment semester workshops
19 United States
20 Uruguay Workshop meetings of the LARWG 03/08 during the Regional PAAO meeting
21 Venezuela
Attachments:
Minutes of the Meeting of the VISION 2020 LA LARWG, held on August 24, 2008 in the Buenos Aires Room of the
Hotel Panamericano, Buenos Aires, Argentina Participants:
1. Dr. Fernando Barría, Co-president of the Advocacy Technical Subcommittee for VISION 2020 Latin America.
2. Dr. Carlos Arieta, President of the VISION 2020 LA Cataract Subcommittee, Brazil.
3. Dr. Fernando Barría, Co-president of the Advocacy Technical Subcommittee for VISION 2020 Latin America.
4. Dr. Juan Batlle, IAPB LA Co-chair, Dominican Republic 5. Dr. Francisco Belisario, Instituto Popular para los Ojos, Venezuela 6. Dr. Miriam Cano, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Central Hospital
of the Instituto de Prevision Social (IPS); President, National VISION 2020 Committee in Paraguay
7. Dr. Felipe Chiriboga, Fundacion Oftalmologica del Valle, Ecuador 8. Dr. Francisco Contreras, President of the Prevention of Blindness Committee
of the APO, Peru. 9. Dr. Rainald Duerksen, Chair of IAPB LA and Fundación Visión, Paraguay 10. Dr. Abraham Delgado, President of the VISION 2020 Committee of Nicaragua 11. Ms. Kristen Eckert, Lions Club International Foundation Director for Latin
America. 12. Dr. Pedro Gomez, Director of the Instituto de la Vision 13. Stefan Hancvencl, Programme Officer, Light for the World, Austria 14. Dr. Magally Hernández de Belisario – Instituto Popular para los Ojos (national
public eye institute), Venezuela 15. Prof. Newton Kara José, Co-president, IAPB LA and President, Refractive
Error Subcommittee, VISION 2020 LA, Brazil 16. Dr. Jorge Kleisinger, President of the “Vision Solidaria” program, Argentina 17. Dr. Van Lansingh, Regional Coordinator, VISION 2020 LA, Argentina 18. Dr. Martin Larrea, member, Blindness Prevention Committee of the
Uruguayan Society of Ophthalmology. 19. Marion Martens, VISION 2020 Latin America office 20. Dr. Francisco Martinez Castro, President of the Technical Subcommittee on
Diabetic Retinopathy and the Quarterly Bulletin, VISION 2020 Latin America 21. Dr. Joaquín Martínez, President of the ophthalmology association of Costa
Rica and member of Costa Rica’s V2020 Committee.. 22. Dr. Joan McLeod, ORBIS International, USA 23. Dr. Luz Marina Melo, Executive Director, ASOPREC, Colombia 24. Dr. Enrique Montjoy, President of the Technical Subcommittee on Refractive
Error of VISION 2020 Latin America 25. Dr. Jose Maria Mugica, Medical Director of the Hugo D. Nano Foundation,
Argentina. 26. Dr. Celia Nakanami, UNIFESP, Brazil, representing Dr. Silvia Veitzman,
President of the VISION 2020 LA Low Vision Technical Subcommittee. 27. Dr. Hugo Nano, Director of the Hugo D. Nano Foundation and Co-chair of the
IAPB-LA. 28. Ms. Maria E. Nano, President of the Monitoring Subcommittee for VISION
2020 LA, Argentina 29. Philippe Narval, Program Officer, Light for the World, Austria 30. Dr. Martin Ruppenthal, CBM LARO, Ecuador 31. Dr. Juan Carlos Silva, Regional Eye-Health Consultant to PAHO, Colombia 32. Dr. Andrea Zin, President of the Childhood Blindness Subcommittee of
VISION 2020 LA, Brazil 33. Dr. Jorge Velazco, VISION 2020 Committee of Peru
34. Architect Juan Francisco Yee of the Visualiza Clinic and VISION 2020 Committee of Guatemala.
35. Dr. Mariano Yee, of the Visualiza Clinic and V2020 Committee of Guatemala, and Co-chair of the Social Entrepreneur Technical Subcommittee of VISION 2020 LA
Guests:
36. Dr. Betty Campos, National Institute of Ophthalmology (INO), Peru 37. Dr. Amelia Cerrate, INO, Peru 38. Dr. Victor Dulanto, INO, Peru 39. Ms. Carolina García, BA, Dominican Republic 40. Dr. Patricio Meza, former president of the Chilean Society of Ophthalmology 41. Nelson Rivera, OD, Regional Coordinator of the International Centre for
Eyecare Education (ICEE) for Latin America, USA 42. Dr. Rodriguez, Colombia 43. Dr. Antonio Vera, Colombia 44. Ms. Natalia Zarate, Argentina
Excused:
1. Dr. Doris Alvarado, VISION 2020 of Honduras 2. Dr. Everardo Barojas, Co-chair of IAPB LA, Mexico 3. Dr. Harry Brown, SEE International, USA. 4. Dr. Ray Brown, President of Vision Paraguay, England. 5. Dr. Homero Demicheli, Vision 2020 Committee of Uruguay 6. Dr. Marco de la Fuente, Director of the Department of Ophthalmology of the
Manuel Gea Gonzalez Hospital and Co-president of the Technical Subcommittee on Childhood Blindness for VISION 2020 Latin America.
7. Dr. Virgilio Galvis, Co-chair of IAPB LA, Colombia 8. Dr. Jesus Jimenez, President of the Technical Subcommittee on Glaucoma of
VISION 2020 LA, Colombia. 9. Dr. Lourdes Medina, Co-president of the Technical Subcommittee on Low
Vision of VISION 2020 Latin America. 10. Dr. Marcelino Rio, VISION 2020 Committee of Cuba 11. Dr. Juan Carlos Rueda, President of the Technical Subcommittee on
Glaucoma of VISION 2020 LA, Colombia. 12. Dr. Karen Seidman, Lighthouse International, USA 13. Dr. Silvia Veitzman, President of the Technical Subcommittee on Low Vision
for VISION 2020 LA, Brazil.
Opening: Dr. Rainald Duerksen welcomed all participants and guests at 8:20 AM. Order of the Day:
1) Approval of the Minutes of the 11th Meeting of the VISION 2020 LA LARWG held in Punta del Este, Uruguay on March 6, 2008. The minutes were accepted by those present as a faithful reproduction of the conduct of the meeting. The motion was proposed by Dr. Juan Batlle, and seconded by Dr. Fernando Barría.
2) Letters Requesting Membership in VISION 2020 Latin America The letters, from the International Eye Foundation (IEF), in the United States, Visualiza, of Guatemala, the Fundación para el Desarrollo de la Mujer (foundation for the development of women, or FUDEM), in El Salvador, and the Casey Eye Institute of the United States. Those present who were familiar with the work of those institutions explained the merits of their requests, and all present voted unanimously to accept them as members. We are happy to welcome them. 3) Presentation of technical subcommittee action plans and activities
reports for 2008. The presentations of the cataract, diabetic retinopathy, monitoring, low vision, childhood blindness, advocacy, and social enterprise subcommittees were presented, with the sections that should be integrated into the regional business plan being noted. 4) Membership in VISION 2020 LA Dr. Juan Batlle presented a proposal to consider other groups or persons that are not physicians, NGOs, or related businesses as “associate members”. The proposal also foresee the possibility of individual memberships and that applications be tabulated at one meeting for the purpose of being discussed and voted on in a later meeting. That will give the member of the LARWG time to consult with the VISION 2020 committee and other members from the country in question to verify the merits of the application. In the 2009 meeting Dr. Battle will explain the criteria of inclusion or exclusion for continued membership and the related bylaws and costs. This is very important because the document will also describe the functions to be carried out by the presidents of the technical subcommittees, as well as how to decide on members of the steering committee from among the LARWG members, designate new posts, etc. It is therefore requested that all persons currently occupying executive posts notify Dr. Lansingh as soon as possible to inform him whether they wish to continue in those posts. 5) Excel tool for calculating the prevalence of blindness and required Cataract Surgery Rate The program was developed by Dr. Fernando Y. Peña of Fundación Visión and has been judged a simple and very useful tool by the various subcommittees. A technical problem occurred during the presentation, and so Dr. Van Lansingh will forward a copy to all participants with the minutes of the meeting. 6) VISION 2020 Ambassadors In the 2007 Cancun meeting, a draft of the selection criteria proposed by WHO was presented. Appropriate candidates to assist the task of the advocacy effort and improve the visibility of VISION 2020 in our region will be sought ought by the committee of each country and their technical subcommittees. Dr. Luz Marina Melo advised us that unfortunately it has not yet been possible to obtain a commitment from Mr. Carlos Vives, a well known Colombian singer and songwriter. Dr. Duerksen has ensured the participation of Mr. Jorge Castro, a well known Paraguayan Tenor, while Ms. Maria Eugenia Nano has
confirmed the participation of her sister, Adriana, a Tango singer twice nominated for a Grammy Award. It is requested that everyone redouble their efforts to obtain more commitments from cultural figures with an international reputation. 7) Presentation of the Draft Guide for Cataract. Dr. Luz Marina Melo presented the draft of a Guide to Cataract, which follows a format similar to that of the guide to ROP for Latin America, and which will be presented at a later meeting. The final document will be circulated by Dr. Carlos Arieta in December. 8) Presentation of the schedule of activities and courses for the remainder of 2008. The schedule was presented by Dr. Van Lansingh, with no amendment being offered by any participant. 9) Selection of new regional and international officers of the IAPB. Mr. Christian Garms is the new Chair of the IAPB; Professor Hugh R. Taylor the new Vice-Chair; Mr. Larry Hansen serves as the new Executive Director, and Mr. Peter Ackland is the new Director of Programmes. Dr. Rainald Duerksen continues as Regional Chair for Latin America. We wish them all the warmest welcome and congratulations, and are pleased to express our sincere desire to work with them to achieve the goals and objectives of VISION 2020. 10) Formation of the new Technical Subcommittee on Social Enterprise Dr. Mariano Yee of the NGO Visualiza in Guatemala is the leader of this new undertaking. He will be charge, in cooperation with the IEF and new members of the LARWG with broad experience in the field, of finding ways to obtain better financing, promotion, and identification of NGOs in the field that promote the concepts of sustainability and solidarity. 11) Summary of Epidemiological Data on Eye Disease Dr. Lansingh explained that the intention is to publish a summary of the data reported during the last five years, even when these are not from peer-reviewed journals, in order to have a baseline for country-by-country analysis with which to monitor any possible progress or to define areas for future research. The summary is being created by 3d-year residents from the Hugo D. Nano Ophthalmology Foundation under the supervision of Ms. Nano and Dr. Lansingh. Some have already forwarded a list of publications. Those who have not are asked to do so before 30 October 2008. 12) World Sight Day 2008 Ms. Abi Smith, IAPB Communications Manager gave a very interesting presentation that is available in English and Spanish. Interested parties should send a request in writing to Dr. Van Lansingh. In her presentation she explained the purpose and objectives of World Sight Day as well as explaining the suggestions and the theme for this year, "Eyes on the Future", which will be held on Thursday 9 October. For further information, please see: http://www.v2020.org/page.asp?section=0001000100070011
Dr. Juan Carlos Silva of PAHO will also carry out the needed advocacy to make sure that from now on, the day will be officially observed in the calendar of this important partner of ours. 13) PowerPoint presentation on the importance of obesity An interesting presentation highlighting the relationship between the metabolic syndrome and its consequences for our eyes. It was prepared by Dr. Francisco Martinez Castro, and is available in Spanish upon written request made to Dr. Van Lansingh. 14) Special IAPB Pre-Assembly Edition of the Spanish-language Edition of the Community Eye Health Journal and Quarterly Bulletin of VISION 2020 Latin America We believe that it will be of great interest to many to read of the happy experiences of doing advocacy in the region, the magnitude of refractive error, what NGOs are doing, and news of useful resources, among other things. Just click here: http://www.revistasaludocular.org/ and here http://www.v2020la.org/bulletin/esp/docs/boletin_13/index.html 15) Presentation by the Lions Club The presentation was made by Ms. Kristen Eckert, Lions Program Coordinator for Latin America. All present expressed their pleasure at the renewed interest and activism of the Lions Clubs in blindness prevention activities in the region. An example of this is their cooperation with Fundación Visión in establishing a community eye-health center for training medical professionals in the region. 16) Report on Priority Countries As has been previously reported, the priority countries in the region are Guatemala, Peru, and the Dominican Republic. A very comprehensive report on the three countries has been prepared, and was presented by Dr. Miriam Cano. It is available in both Spanish and English. If you would like a copy of the summary or the complete report, please request it in writing from Dr. Van Lansingh. 17) Presentation of Reports on the Achievements and Plans of the National Vision 2020 Committees of Latin America. Each country represented gave a presentation on these topics that was very interesting and which resulted in allowing the exchange of experiences and suggestions among all those present. If you would like a copy of the PowerPoint presentation for a particular country, please request it in writing from Dr. Van Lansingh.
18) Upcoming meeting of the LARWG
Dr. Lansingh will be in touch to advise LARWG members of the schedule. The meeting is normally held in conjunction with one of the larger medical conferences, but as there is no World Ophthalmology Congress scheduled for next year, and the PAAO Conference will be held near the end of October 2009, jointly with that of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, in San Francisco. Suggestions are welcome!
With no other business to be concluded, the session was ended at 8:30 PM.
Report
Second Latin American Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) Workshop and
Joint meeting with the V Congress of Sociedad Iberoamericana de
Neonatología (SIBEN)
Mar del Plata, Argentina
September 15-17, 2008
Facilitators: Clare Gilbert, FRCOphth, MD., MSc. International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Graham E Quinn, MD, MSCE, Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Professor of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Andrea Zin, MD, MSc. Neonatology Department, Instituto Fernandes Figueira, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Marco de la Fuente, MD MSc. Chief of Ophthalmology Division, Hospital Manuel Gea Gonzalez, México City, México Licenciada Ana Quiroga, Escuela de Enfermería Universidad Austral, Ministerio de Salud de la Nación, Argentina Augusto Sola, President of Siben Sponsors: Christoffel Blindenmission PAHO The second, region-wide Latin American Workshop on Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) was held
immediately before the regional neonatology meeting (the V Congress of the Sociedad
Iberoamericana de Neonatología (Siben)). A one day seminar on ROP was also held during Siben for
those attending the Congress. The meetings took place in Mar del Plata, Argentina from September
15-17, 2008 with support from CBM (Christoffel Blindnenmission), Panamerican Health Organization
(PAHO) and Iridex.
The purpose of the 2 day workshop was to provide up to date information on ROP as a cause of
blindness in Latin America and on current ROP programmes in order to improve existing programmes
and plan new ones.
The workshop was attended by 41 participants from 13 countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile,
Colombia, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, Venezuela and
Uruguay), included neonatologists, nurses and ophthalmologists. Facilitators were Dr Augusto Sola,
President of Sociedad Iberoamericana de Neonatologia, Dr Graham Quinn, paediatric ophthalmologist
from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, USA, Prof Clare Gilbert, from
the International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Nurse Ana
Quiroga, Ministry of Health (Argentina), Dr Marco de La Fuente (Mexico) and Andrea Zin (Brazil), both
CBM medical advisors and IAPB chairs for childhood blindness (Appendix 1 for time table).
The purpose of the one day seminar during the Siben Congress was to increase awareness of ROP
among neonatologists and nurses in the region, and to emphasize the critical role they can play in
preventing the condition and in reducing blindness (Appendix 2 for time table). At least 700 of the
1,200 delegates attended the seminar.
Background
Retinopathy of prematurity is, to a large extent, a preventable cause of blindness. There are two main
approaches to control: good neonatal care to reduce risk factors (e.g. better monitoring of
supplemental oxygen; reduction in sepsis and stress; better nutrition) and programmes whereby
ophthalmologists visit neonatal units to examine babies at risk, and apply laser treatment to those
eyes that develop “type 1” or worse ROP. A multidisciplinary approach is, therefore, needed involving
neonatologists and neonatal nurses, ophthalmologists and parents. Support from Ministries of Health
is essential, as well as support to implement ROP programs by non-government organizations.
Advocacy will be required.
Each year there are approximately 10,500,000 live births in Latin America. Approximately
100,000 are born premature and weigh less than 1,500g (1%) at birth, and 60% (60,000) of these
babies have access to neonatal care. The overall survival rate in babies weighing 1,500g is around
60% which means there are estimated to be 42,000 premature babies each year who are at high risk
of ROP, all of whom require screening for ROP. According to data from the region, babies with higher
birth weights (up to 2000gs at birth) are also at risk of ROP and so the number of babies in the
region who need to be examined each year is likely to be at least 60,000. The proportion of babies
examined for ROP who develop the severe stages of the disease where treatment is indicated varies
from neonatal unit to neonatal unit, but it is estimated that at least 4,000 and maybe as many as
6,000 babies will benefit from treatment each year in Latin America.
The first region-wide Latin American ROP Workshop was held in Peru in 2005. This was the
first time neonatologists, nurses and ophthalmologists from 18 countries of the region had the
opportunity to meet since the very first workshop which was held in Quito in 1997. In 2005
participants concluded that:
• ROP was an important cause of blindness in children in the region.
• In some countries the proportion of blindness due to ROP was increasing, although not all
countries have data on the causes of blindness in children.
• There are many challenges to increasing coverage of ROP programmes. Lack of financial
reimbursement for time spent by ophthalmologists on the programme is a major factor.
• Meticulous neonatal care is essential for decreasing the risk of severe ROP.
• Each country identified key activities to be undertaken over the next 3 months, and over the
next 12 months (report of First Latin American ROP Workshop).
The recommendations that emerged from the participants were:
• To collect data on childhood blindness causes using the WHO methodology
• To perform a situational analysis of the number of neonatal units, preterm babies at risk of
developing severe ROP and availability of human and financial resources and infrastructure.
• To develop regional guidelines for ROP management
• To improve awareness with parents, governments, health care personnel
• To develop a monitoring and evaluation tool
The poster presentations and discussions at the second regional workshop enabled the progress
different countries had made to be documented.
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES:
September 15
The workshop was opened by Dr Sola, President of Siben, who welcomed participants. Dr Zin
presented the purposes of the meeting and the activities of the IAPB Childhood Blindness Committee
followed by Prof Gilbert who gave a presentation on ROP as a cause of blindness globally and in Latin
America. Dr Sola discussed possible interventions to prevent ROP from the perspectives of
neonatologists and nurses. Dr Sola stressed the importance of collecting information as it is necessary
“to prove in order to improve” i.e. information and data are essential for evidence, advocacy and
monitoring. A recent study has shown that there is still a huge gap between what is known with
respect to aspects of neonatal care which would prevent ROP (and reduce other adverse neonatal
outcomes) and what is currently being done – efforts need to focus on implementing what we already
know prevents ROP. After Dr Sola’s presentation, Dr de la Fuente presented a report of the workshop
held in Lima.
Information on the current situation of countries ROP screening programmes was provided during 2
poster sessions: the first one was on September 15 (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Dominican Republic, and El Salvador) and the second (Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru,
Venezuela and Uruguay)non the following day.
The afternoon was dedicated to group work. Participants were divided into groups to discuss the
challenges and solutions to implementing ROP programmes:
Group work session 1; Topics for discussion:
1. What are the limitations of current programmes for case detection?
2. How could these be overcome?
3. What concrete steps can be taken to improve the quality of current case detection and treatment
programmes?
Participants highlighted the following:
Human resources: Lack of trained nurses, neonatologists and other support staff who are often poorly
distributed. Training curriculae need to be included at all levels for medical and nursing training and
for training support staff.
Relationships between neonatologists and ophthalmologists are not always good and need to be
improved by increasing awareness of each others’ challenges and constraints. ROP needs to be seen
as a joint problem with joint solutions.
Equipment: There is not always enough equipment for delivering and monitoring oxygen, as well as
for examining the preterm babies at risk (indirect ophthalmoscopes, lens, lid speculum) and
inadequate equipment for treating ROP.
Political will and financial support: Lack funds for equipment, adequate staff and to cover costs of
screening and treatment limit implementation of programmes. In several countries of the region there
is no national policy or any law regulating that preterm babies at risk should be examined, and
treated when severe ROP is diagnosed.
In order for programmes to become sustainable it is important that there is advocacy with policy
makers and service providers so that more resources are made available for preventive measures and
to cover the costs of running ROP programmes. This will mean that control of ROP needs to be made
a higher priority which can be done by highlighting the fact that better neonatal care will contribute
towards achieving Millenium Development Goals. Ministries of Health are also expected to develop
and implement national prevention of blindness plans. It is important that all countries in the region
include prevention of ROP blindness in their national prevention of blindness plans.
Lack of data and poor organization: Reliable information is not always routinely collected to help plan,
implement and monitor ROP programmes.
Awareness: Parents and the community do not know about ROP. Education and awareness raising
among parents and the community is also very important and has not been prioritized in many
programmes.
A second group work session was dedicated to the update of the Latin American Guidelines. Nurses,
neonatologists and ophthalmologists all contributed.
September 16
Dr Luz Gordillo opened the second day of the workshop talking about the need for follow-up of pre-
term babies. Premature babies are at increased risk of significant refractive errors, particularly
myopia, strabismus and amblyopia compared with full term babies. They may also have visual
impairment from ROP as well as from lesions of the higher visual pathways (optic nerve, visual
cortex, and higher association areas).
The second poster session on information of ROP programmes was held for: Guatemala, Mexico,
Nicaragua, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela.
Participants were divided into groups to discuss common challenges where countries could coordinate
efforts. The areas discussed included: training in examination and treatment; management
information systems (minimum dataset); planning, monitoring and evaluating programmes;
information for parents and providers; advocacy and information for policy makers and prevention of
ROP through education and awareness among nurses and neonatologists and how experiences in
other countries be used to address these challenges
Country achievements:
A. Countries that have started programmes since 2005:
Dominican Republic and Guatemala have started to implement screening and treatment
programmes. Neonatal units are poorly equipped and training of health care personnel is needed.
In Dominican Republic there are 8 neonatal units in the governmental sector and 15 private units. Six
of the government units sector have screening and treatment programmes, whereas none of the
private have access to this service. Neonatal care needs improvement regarding equipment and
human resources. Only 40% of NICUs have blenders, CPAP or mechanical ventilation. Thirteen
percent of examined preterm babies develop severe ROP (BW< 2500g; GA < 37 wks).
B. Countries which have an increased emphasis on prevention:
Argentina: coverage of screening and treatment programme is similar to 2005 with over 2/3 of
neonatal units having a programme (113/158). The ROP Collaborative Working Group, established in
2003 and supported by the Ministry of Health, provides regular training and monitoring of the
programme. Information is available, but still there is lack of human resources and equipment. Since
2006, other treatment centres have been established in Argentina. The Ministry of Health
implemented a strategy to decrease the number of babies developing severe ROP, consisting of
training of personnel, provision of equipment, implementation or enforcement of norms (oxygen
supply & ophthalmologic examinations). They expanded this initiative to 30 NICUs in the country and
so far the number of treatments for ROP has decreased substantially.
Peru: In 2006, Ministry of Health of Peru signed a Resolutión Ministerial (No 422-2005/MINSA), June
8, 2006, which approved Guidelines for Clinical Practice. The National Guidelines for ROP were
approved by the Ministry of Health. Many programmes are being expanded outside Lima. ORBIS
international are supporting a programme of prevention which entails one week training of all staff
working in 15 NICUs in Lima, and better equipment for administering and monitoring oxygen. Rates
of ROP needing treatment and the number of children presenting to Dra Luz blind from ROP will be
used to monitor the impact of the training.
El Salvador: The Ministry of Health has approved national guidelines for Management of preterm
babies with birth weight < 2,000g (”Guía Técnica para el seguimiento del recién nacido prematuro
menor de 2000 gr. al nacer”), which includes ROP screening and treatment. All 6 governmental units
of the country have access to this service. However, the ROP programme needs to be expanded to
the private units. At least at Hospital Nacional de Maternidad, one of the national referral centres for
high risk pregnancies, the rates of severe ROP are decreasing as a result in improvement in neonatal
care.
C. Countries which have improved in other ways:
Chile: Chile has a very comprehensive national programme that assures all preterm babies born in
the country to have access to eye exam and treatment of ROP (garantias explicitas de salud). There
are now 6 centres for laser therapy and 1 centre has been developed to treat babies with Stage 4 or
5 ROP. Ministry of Health supports all aspects of the programme.
Brazil and Mexico: Both countries have many similarities and the coordination of a national
programme in both countries is a challenge.
o Ophthalmologists have a good level of training, but availability of professionals
adequately trained in governmental units is a challenge.
o Distribution of equipment to diagnose and treat is also not adequate. As a
consequence, screening and treatment coverage is insufficient in the 2 biggest
countries of the region, approximately 50%.
o Neonatal care needs improvement as NICUs are not all fully equipped to provide
oxygen delivery safely, as well other aspects of neonatal care needs improvement.
Opportunities for education is scarce for neonatal nurses.
o The Ministry of Health in Mexico is analysing the official Mexican guideline (NOM
- Norma oficial mexicana) 34 SSA2-2000, probably by the end of 2008
there will be an official and obligatory law that assures that all preterm
babies have access to exam and treatment.
o Ministry of Health of Brazil is reimbursing examination and treatment for
ROP at governmental level.
o Both countries established screening and treatment guidelines in 2007.
D. Countries that have expanded their programmes:
Several countries expanded their screening and treatment coverage, e.g. Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador,
Colombia, Peru, Mexico and Venezuela. Ministries of Health have been involved in many ways,
collaborating with National Societies, ophthalmologists, neonatologists and nurses.
E. Countries where ROP prevention is very critical
Nicaragua: It is estimated that at least 500 babies would need screening for ROP every year and
that approximately 50 would benefit from treatment. Only 5 of the 17 NICUs in the country have an
ROP programme. There is no training in neonatology in the country, with a serious shortage of
neonatologists and nurses. Also training of ophthalmologists is very difficult. There is no laser in the
country but cryo is available. Fifteen percent of examined babies develop plus disease (screening
criteria BW < 1 800 g; GA < 35 wks).
F. Countries not represented at the workshop, but that sent reports:
Ecuador: The ROP screening program was extended from 4 neonatal units at the beginning of the
program in 2003 to 16 neonatal units by December 2007. An increasing number of children screened
and treated were the result of implementing this project (see below). This data was obtained during
the national workshops on ROP usually done at the beginning of each year.
2004 2005 2006 2007 # Examined Patients 534 1088 1551 1741 # Patients with ROP 134 205 225 336 # treated Patients 25 44 65 73
Ecuador has now a National Plan for Blindness Prevention for ROP that was approved by the Ministry
of Health. The same standardized form is used in all neonatal units. A standardized protocol for
oxygen administration in these babies is used in all neonatal units. Health Education Material for
preventing Blindness for ROP is available for parents and doctors. Thanks to the amount of
information (brochures, posters placed in neonatal units, TV interviews, articles written in
newspapers, etc,) mothers and doctors are more aware of the importance of screening premature
babies.
Paraguay: There are nine govermental NICUs, of which 6 have implemented ROP screening and
treatment programmes, but none of the 9 private NICUs have a programme in place. Forteen percent
of examined babies develop severe disease (screening criteria BW ≤ 1,750g; GA ≤ 34 wks). All the
activities are supported by Fundación Visión and so far government has very little involvement.
September 17
The 3rd day of the workshop was held in Costa Galana Hotel, venue of the V Siben Congress. It was
an excellent opportunity for advocacy to 700 neonatologists and nurses from Latin America who
attended the ROP session called ROP in Latin America: Where are we and where are we
going?
Conclusions:
1. ROP remains as in important cause of avoidable childhood blindness in Latin America. However
there is still lack of information about current causes of childhood blindness in the great majority
of countries.
2. Retinopathy of prematurity prevention requires a comprehensive approach: good antenatal care,
improvement of neonatal care (primary prevention), diagnosis and treatment of ROP (secondary
prevention) and visual (re)habilitation (tertiary prevention). All countries in Latin America need to
address all 3 levels in order to decrease childhood blindness due to ROP.
a. Human resources:
i. There is still a need to train ophthalmologists to screen and manly to treat.
ii. Lack of knowledge: need to improve level of training of neonatologists,
nurses
b. Equipment needs
i. Primary prevention: blenders, oxymeters
ii. Secondary prevention: lack of indirect ophthalmoscopes and lasers
iii. Tertiary prevention: low vision aids. There are very few low vision
programmes, specially those dedicated to the children
3. Most countries are following similar policies and practices for screening and treatment. The Latin
American Examination and Treatment Guidelines were revised with emphasis on the utilisation of
broader screening criteria. Guidelines were also developed for the use of oxygen and treatment
management by neonatologists and nurses.
4. With support from ministries of health and international and local non-government organizations
ROP programmes are expanding in many countries in Latin America. National ROP Committees
have been formed and management information systems developed. Latin American Neonatal
and Ophthalmological guidelines were written in 2006 and updated in October 2007, January
and September 2008.
5. Detection of cases is improving in many countries; however, access to treatment services is
complicated in several countries.
6. There is a high number of “unusual cases” (babies with BW > 1500g and severe ROP) and
missing opportunities implying that much could be done to reduce the incidence of ROP.
7. Neonatal care in Latin America is still critical in several countries with gaps in technical and
human resources. There are few opportunities for education and training of nurses and
neonatologists. Rates of ROP should be used as an indicator of levels of neonatal care.
8. Programme management
a. Data are not being collected in a standardised manner.
b. Detailed written protocols need to be developed, approved by the National
Committee, and used throughout the national programme
Recommendations
1. ROP as a cause of blindness:
More data are needed on ROP as a cause of blindness.
Action
1.1 There is a need to collect these data where they are currently not available, and, if possible, to
repeat data collection every 10 years, to monitor trends over time
1.2 Ideally the World Health Organization’s Prevention of Blindness methodology and classification
should be used, so that data are comparable between countries and over time. Available from
Clare Gilbert, ICEH
1.3 These data need to be published and presented at meetings, to increase awareness of the
problem of ROP blindness and so as “to prove, to improve”
2. Situation analysis:
Countries improved the knowledge of the extent of their screening programmes. Also there is a better
understanding of the needs
Action
2.1 That a situation analysis continue to be undertaken in countries to provide information on the
number of units in the country, and the provider; the number of preterm babies at risk, and the
extent to which the screening programme is meeting this need. This information is essential for
planning.
3. Increasing coverage:
There are many challenges to increasing coverage of ROP programmes. Lack of financial
reimbursement for time spent by ophthalmologists on the programme is still a major factor
Action
3.1 Countries in the region with well established programmes can assist those countries where
programmes have only just started, particularly in terms of training in screening and treatment
as well as different aspects of neonatal care. This could be done through a well developed plan
of ongoing support and partnership.
3.2 To develop sustainable programmes, government support is required. This will need advocacy
and lobbying, highlighting that improvement of neonatal care will help to meet the Millennium
Developmental Goals
3.3 That countries publish their experiences and findings, so that programmes can learn from each
other.
4. Follow up of premature babies:
Late sequelae (ophthalmological and systemic) are much more common in premature than in full
term babies. Long term follow up of premature babies regardless of ROP status, is therefore
required, to identify and manage problems, some of which are sight threatening.
Action
4.1 Appropriate, realistic guidelines need to be developed, to make sure babies most at risk are
followed up
4.2 Health education and awareness of the need for follow up should be included in information for
parents
4.3 Planning and advocating for peadiatric and ophthalmological services for long term follow up
should be part of ROP programmes
5. Awareness:
Many countries have produced health education materials for parents, the general public, and for
health care providers (neonatologists and eyecare providers). However, more still needs to be done to
increase the profile of ROP in many countries.
Action
5.1 Countries need to make sure that raising awareness is explicitly included in their programmes.
This can be achieved through publications, the mass media etc.
5.2 Given the common language throughout the region, educational materials should be made widely
available, possibly through the IAPB website.
5.3 Different aspects of ROP and ROP control programmes need to be included in the curriculae of
nurses, ophthalmologists, paediatricians and neonatologists.
5.4 Continuing education for ophthalmologists, neonatologists and nurses should also include ROP
6. Monitoring and evaluation of programmes:
Each country needs to decide the minimum essential information needed to monitor and evaluate
their programme, from the perspectives of coverage, and quality.
Action
6.1 That a standard reporting form, database, and statistical package be used throughout the region,
if possible: CLAP/PAHO Dr Jose Luis Rossello
7. Regional neonatology group:
Meticulous neonatal care is essential for preventing ROP
Action
7.1 That the regional group of neonatologists and nurses keep addressing issues of relevance to the
prevention of ROP.
8. Communication:
Sharing of information of relevance to all aspects of ROP and its control is important in preventing the
disease and improving programmes. At the recent regional meeting in Panama it was agreed that a
CD of all relevant information be produced and made widely available.
Action
8.1 A website (www.prorop.com) is being developed by the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in
Spanish, Portuguese and English, under the support of the PAAO. It will provide information for
health care personnel, parents and will give the chance to share ideas and discuss problems and
their possible solution. It will be available in 30 days.
Other:
http://www.rop21.com.ar
http://www.boostnz.info/ROP/
Output
• Updated situational analysis
• Improved neonatal care guidelines on how ROP needing treatment might be prevented
• Revised guidelines on all aspects of ROP programs, including neonatal and ophthalmologic
components
• Plans to improve the quality of current ROP programs:
• Courses to NICU health care personnel, practical guidelines for ROP programmes
• Annual budgets for the above plans
• A list of indicators to monitor and evaluate progress
• Number of courses to health care personnel/country/year
• Number of trained health care personnel
Plans for 2009
ROP Workshop Bolivia
ROP Workshop for Centroamerica
APPENDIX 1 TIMETABLE ROP Workshop: Mar del Plata, Argentina September 15-16, 2008 (Monday, Tuesday) Hotel Iruña Purpose: Update information on ROP as a cause of blindness in Latin America and on current ROP programs in order to improve existing programs and plan new programs and initiatives for prevention Objectives: Experience and expertise of the participants will be used to: Identify the need for ROP examination and treatment of at risk babies, by country:
• information on the epidemiology of ROP (i.e. magnitude of the blindness due to ROP in children; incidence of ROP in preterm and low birth weight babies; characteristics of infants with severe ROP i.e. birth weight and gestational age)
• revise estimates of the number of preterm babies who need to be examined and number of those needing treatment
Describe services for premature babies:
• determine number of NICUs with and without ROP programs, and estimate the coverage (i.e. % of babies at risk who are included in ROP programs)
• current levels of care for preterm and low birth weight babies in the different health care sectors
• identify current policies and practices: e.g. transport arrangements for outborn babies; labor ward resuscitation practices – 100% O2 or air or blended; nurses’ role in neonatal care
• identify key areas where neonatal care practices may be improved to prevent ROP
Review current ROP programs – clinical aspects: • identify current ROP examination and treatment practices for preterm and low birth weight
babies (e.g. criteria for examination; timing of examinations; indications for treatment) • review the Regional ROP examination protocol in use • identify strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats • make recommendations concerning developing or strengthening programs for ROP
examination and treatment of preterm and low birth weight babies at risk
Review current ROP programs – managerial / other aspects: • existence and activities of National ROP Committees • analyse the organization and management of existing ROP programs e.g. responsibilities and
interests of different stakeholders (e.g. pediatrician, neonatologist, nurse, ophthalmologist, parents)
• elaborate how the interaction and cooperation between different involved stakeholders can be optimized (regarding both ROP examination and treatment)
• analyse the underlying governmental regulatory framework including governmental support
Output: 1. Updated situational analysis 2. Improved neonatal care guidelines on how ROP needing treatment might be prevented 3. Revised guidelines on all aspects of ROP programs, including neonatal and ophthalmologic
components 4. Plans to improve the quality of current ROP programs 5. Plans to increase coverage of ROP programs to units which do not currently have programs 6. Annual budgets for the above plans 7. A list of indicators to monitor and evaluate progress Important information for participants – This workshop provides a unique opportunity for those involved in caring for babies at risk of ROP, and those involved in examinations and treatment of ROP, to share experiences, and to address issues that are common across the region. For this reason, ample time has been allocated during the workshop for group work. Participants from each country should present the country information in poster format. It is suggested that
• nurses and neonatologists produce a poster with information on neonatal care • ophthalmologists produce a separate poster with information ROP examination and
treatment. Posters (2 per country) should focus on: Nurses/Neonatologists
• Situation in each country regarding neonatal care: o Number of units in the country:
� Number with ROP programs � Number without ROP programs
Suggested format: Government NICUs Private NICUs University NICUs Total With ROP program Without ROP program Total:
o Total of live births, by birth weight and gestational age groups � Birth weight groups: <1000g, 1001-<1500g, 1500-<2000g, 2000-<2500g,
2500g or more � Gestational age groups: <30 wks, 30-<34 wks, 34-<37 wks, 37 wks or more
Suggested format: Admitted (N) Mortality rate (%) Survive (N) <1000g 1001-1499g 1500-1999g 2000-2499g 2500g+ Total: Admitted (N) Mortality rate (%) Survive (N) <30 weeks 30-<34 weeks 34-<37 weeks
37+ weeks Total:
o Labor ward resuscitation practices – 100% O2 or air or blended o Number of neonatologists and nurses per bed in units o Number of nurses/shift/incubator in high and intermediate risk o Different ways to give oxygen to the newborn and how do you monitor the oxygen o Inservice NiCU training for nurses and neonatologists available? If yes, which kind? o Neonatology training available in the country? National Society of Neonatology?
Opthalmologists • Situation in region regarding ROP examinations and treatment:
• National committee in place? • Support from government o Coverage: total number of NICUs and number of NICUs of examination
programmes (i.e. the % of units that have examinations programs) o examination criteria
� method of examination � frequency of examination
o rates of treatment � BW and GA of babies needing treatment � available methods of treatment � treatment undertaken in OR, NICU or transported to other facility � Anaesthesiologist available for treatment /sedation by neonatologists
o Training of ophthalmologists to examine and treat available? � How it is being undertaken? Training of residents?
o rates of follow up after discharge til risk of progression is low o follow up in Pediatric clinics o links to low vision services o collaboration between neonatologists and ophthalmologists
Common information (participants will decide who should present this) o Good experiences o challenges and constraints o Advocacy for parents, National Societies, government o Plans for the next 3 years o Educational material developed (to bring samples)
Day 1 Monday September 15th 2008 8:00-8:45 Posters put up
9:00 Welcome and Introduction Sola
9:15 Objectives of the Workshop Zin
9:25 Activities of IAPB Childhood Blindness Committee/Others ICH Zin 9:30 ROP as a cause of blindness Gilbert 9:40 Interventions to prevent ROP Sola
9:50 Report of Lima Oct 2005 Workshop Fuente
10:00-12N View posters from: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador
12:48 Lunch
2:00
Group work session 1 with feedback 4. What are the limitations of current programmes for case detection? 5. How could these be overcome? 6. What concrete steps can be taken to improve the quality of current case detection
and treatment programmes? 3:30 Break
3:50
Group work session 2a with feedback - ophthalmologists: Can a standard protocol / best practice guidelines be developed for the region on: 1. Information given to parents by ophthalmologists 2. Screening criteria 3. Timing, method, frequency and place of examinations, and ensuring
follow up 4. Indications and consent for treatment 5. Method of treatment, and follow up after treatment 6. Training in examination and treatment 7. Follow up of premature babies 8. Referral to low vision / rehabilitation programmes for children with
visual impairment from ROP 9. Data to be collected for monitoring and evaluating programmes Group work session 2b with feedback - neonatologists: Can a standard protocol / best practice guidelines be developed for the region on: 1. Minimal acceptable standards for oxygen monitoring 2. Information given to parents by neonatologists with respect to ROP 3. Identifying and recording babies needing examination (who and how) 4. Care during examination in intensive care 5. Ensuring discharged and treated babies attend for follow up 6. Care during laser/cryo treatment 7. Follow up of premature babies by pediatricians 8. Data to be collected for monitoring and evaluating programmes
4:45 Group feedback Day 2 Tuesday September 16th 2008 (continued):
8:00-8:45 Posters put up
9:00 Need for follow up of premature babies Gordillo
9:15 – 11:30 View posters from: Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela
11:30 Break
11:50 Group work session 4: What are common challenges in which can countries coordinate efforts? 1. Training in examination and treatment 2. Management information systems (minimum dataset) 3. Planning, monitoring and evaluating programmes 4. Information for parents and providers 5. Advocacy and information for policy makers 6. Prevention of ROP through education and awareness among nurses and neonatologists
What challenges are unique to countries? 1. How can experiences in other countries be used to address these challenges?
13:00 Feedback
14:00 Lunch
Afternoon
Conclusions and recommendations
Committee to work on preparing conclusions for presentation at SIBEN meeting SIBEN Meeting ROP in Latin America: Where are we and where are we going? Facilitators: Gilbert, Zin, Sola, Quinn, de la Fuente, Quiroga Wednesday September 17, 2008 Hotel Costa Galana (9:00 AM TO 5:00 PM) 9:00 Welcome and Introduction Bauer, Sola 9:10 Meeting Objectives A Zin 9:15 ROP as a cause of blindness: An international perspective C Gilbert 9:45 ROP as a cause of blindness in LA. Summary of the II LA ROP Workshop Zin 10:15 New mechanisms on ROP genesis Chemtob 10:35 ROP pathophysiology Stiris 11:00 Break 11:20 Classification of ROP de la Fuente 11:40 Detection of serious retinopathy: current and alternative methods Quinn 12:00 Current treatment options Quinn 12:20 ROP from a neonatologist’s perspective: Primary prevention Sola 12:40 Nurses’ role in the prevention of ROP Quiroga 13:00 Break 13:30 Lunch and Abstracts presentation
Group 1: abstracts 3 and 4- Moderators Sola and Zin Group 2: Abstracts 1, 2, and 5 – Moderators Quinn and Gilbert
14:30 Break
15:00 Round table: Zin, Gilbert, Quinn, de
what has worked in various countries and what hasn’t worked? Suggestions from the floor on new approaches to implementing programs?
la Fuente, Benitez, Quiroga
15:30 Action plan for prevention. Conclusions and recommendations
II Latin American ROP Workshop Mar del Plata Argentina September 15-17 2008
List of participants
Ophthalmologists Country email
South America
Julio Manzitti Argentina [email protected]
Marta Galan Argentina [email protected]
Gustavo Aguirre Urquizu Bolivia [email protected]
Alexia Romanelli Bolivia [email protected]
Joao Borges Fortes Brazil [email protected]
Juan Pablo Lopez Chile [email protected] [email protected]
Claudia Zuluaga Colombia [email protected]
Luz Gordillo Peru [email protected]
Leonora Martinotti Uruguay [email protected]
Edwin Martinez Venezuela [email protected]
Maria Alejandra Rodriguez Venezuela [email protected]
Central America and Caribbean
Juan L. Ubiera Dominican Republic [email protected]
Finella dell Arciprete de Rottmann El Salvador [email protected]
Maria Eugenia Sanchez de Oliva Guatemala [email protected]
Luis Porfirio Orozco Gomez Mexico [email protected]
Rommel A. Izaguirre Nicaragua [email protected]
Neonatologists
South America
Alicia Benitez Argentina [email protected]
Celia Lomutro Argentina [email protected]
Ernesto Alda Argentina [email protected]
Luis Ahumada Argentina [email protected]
Teresa Sepulveda Argentina [email protected]
María Inés Martinini Argentina [email protected]
Lidia Galina Argentina [email protected]
Juan Manuel Jijena Duran Bolivia [email protected]
Shirley Yolanda Cuenca Rocabado Bolivia [email protected]
Clara Galviz Colombia [email protected]
Ana Maria Villanueva Peru [email protected]
Aura Mayela Illas de Gonzalez Venezuela [email protected]
Ingrid Rangel Venezuela [email protected]
Neonatologists
Central America and Caribbean
Carlos Roberto Martinez Lopez El Salvador [email protected]
Marco Rivera Meza Nicaragua [email protected]
Tania Corpeno Olivas Nicaragua [email protected]
Nurses
South America
Norma Erpen Argentina [email protected]
Maria Claudia Rearte Argentina [email protected]
Aida Luz Ramirez Segovia Ramirez Bolivia [email protected]
Cristina Tolaba Jurado Bolivia [email protected]
Lourdes Tatiana Torres Bolivia [email protected] Cecilia Reyes Acuña Chile [email protected]
Margareth Dutra Brazil [email protected]
Irama Lopez Venezuela [email protected]
Central America and Caribbean
Jovita Placencia, Mexico Mexico [email protected]
Facilitators
Augusto Sola USA [email protected]
Ana Quiroga Argentina [email protected]
Clare Gilbert UK [email protected]
Graham Quinn USA [email protected]
Marco A. de la Fuente Torres Mexico [email protected]
Andrea Zin Brazil [email protected]
COMMUNITY EYE HEALTH COURSE VISION 2020-THE RIGHT TO SIGHT
Tegucigalpa, Honduras October 08-10, 2008
Course Organized by CBM-CARO I Background information
Honduras is the second poorest country in Central America with a population of 7.6 million. According to the World Fact book it is estimated that 50.7% of the population is living below the poverty line. Honduras is divided in 18 departments: Atlantida, Choluteca, Colon, Comayagua, Copan, Cortes, El Paraiso, Francisco Morazan, Gracias a Dios, Intibuca, Islas de la Bahia, La Paz, Lempira, Ocotepeque, Olancho, Santa Barbara, Valle and Yoro. The main eye health services are provided in the capital Tegucigalpa and the northwestern part of the country. There are about 60 ophthalmologists in the whole country. CBM support for this country in diverse mandate areas is required. Prevention of blindness is certainly one of the key areas to work on. In January 2008, RO staff announced the intention of CBM to organize a Community Eye Health Course in Honduras; dates for the course were agreed according to facilitator’s availability and in agreement with PBL partners and the president of the National Committee of prevention of Blindness. This was the first CEH course carried out in Honduras. It was directed to ophthalmologists, eye nurses, ophthalmic assistants and project managers. Participants came mainly from the capital, Tegucigalpa, and from the second most important city, San Pedro Sula. Both places are where most professionals are concentrated. In Honduras, there is a National Committee for V2020 named “Asociación Nacional de Visión 2020 Honduras” (ASONAVIH). In May 2007 a draft of the National Plan for prevention of blindness was presented to CBM (see document attached) this document was developed mainly with the contribution of Dr. Alvarado and Mr. Bahr. The draft of the plan has also being revised by Dr. Van Lansingh. This plan is not completed at the present time but stakeholders are still working on it. Due to the many replacements of Ministry of health poor progress has been achieved to involve public health authorities. The president of the V2020 committee, Dr. Doris Alvarado, is presently working at the most important reference hospital in Honduras “Hospital General San Felipe” located in the capital city. Moreover, Dr. Alvarado is president of the National Ophthalmology Society. II – Aims and Objectives:
1. Develop strategies to work efficiently within the framework of community eye health programmes.
2. Present the current situation of blindness in Latin America and Caribbean 3. Contribute with activities for prevention of blindness 4. Promotion of a National Plan for Honduras 5. Establish local alliances
II - Faculty members:
1. Dr. Pedro Gomez, Director of Instituto de la Visión, NL, México. CBM Medical Adviser
2. Dr. Felipe Chiriboga, Medical Director of the Fundación Oftalmológica del Valle, Ecuador. CBM Medical adviser
3. Dr. Colin Cook, Opthalmologist, Groote Schuur Hospital VISION 2020 project, Cape Town, South Africa.
II- Programme and list of participants (See attachment) IV- Course
The course took place at Real Clarion Hotel located in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. It was a four days course. During the organization of the course participants were strongly encouraged to attend. Invitation letters to the ministries of health and education were emailed prior to the course. Key stakeholders such as the director of the university resident programme, personnel from the public health and ophthalmologists were invited. However, there was a poor reaction from the local people which highly threat the successful of the course.
Sadly, only 24 persons attended the course out of which 9 were ophthalmologists, the other participants were project managers, the only resident, optometrists, doctors and students willing to start the ophthalmology residence programme. Considering the number of ophthalmologist in the country (60), it indicates that 15% of the ophthalmologist in Honduras attended the CEH course. CBM organized a welcome cocktail during the first evening of the course. Unfortunately, during this day people went on strike against the new Minister of Health, Dr. Carlos Aguilar, and consequently he did not attend. The representative of the education sector confirmed her participation but she never showed up. Facilitators delivered their presentations according to the programme planned. During the days of the course, participants showed their interest on the themes presented by the speakers. Nevertheless, due to the heterogeneous group it was very difficult to coordinate group activities and to present better outcomes. During the fourth and last day, the audience considerably decreased.
V- Achievements
- Facilitators strongly encourage the National Committee members to work toward the development of a suitable National Plan
- Participants started to create alliances between different eye clinics and other stakeholders.
- A representative of the “Healthy Schools Programme” (Programa Escuela Saludables) expressed her will and commitment to coordinate activities with the different eye clinics and the staff of the public hospital San Felipe.
- Awareness of the current situation of blindness in Latin America, Caribbean and their own local situation.
VI- Problems
• Ophthalmologists are not willing to invest their time in Community eye health courses.
• National Plan has being developed theoretically, however the key people has not being involved. Local authorities do not seem to be interested in participate to the National Plan activities. Their estimated figures are not according to the real need.
• On the other hand, an important factor to be considered is the Cuban presence in Honduras (Misión Milagro) and recent political agreements between Venezuela and Honduras.
VII - Future plans per organizations, clinics (Group exercise)
- National Committee on PBL to work on the plan according to their real situation, figures and needs.
San Felipe Hospital
• To improve patients flow • Sensitize ophthalmologists in the community eye health • To plan surgical campaigns • To utilize the operating room during the evening shift.
Refractive error:
• To impulse and create a refractive error programme in coordination with the healthy schools programme personnel (Programa de escuela saludable) concentrating on children of 6th grade.
Centro Oftalmológico Vida Abundante (COVA)
• To open a clinic in the rural area and provide transport to the patients of the surroundings.
• To utilize in the cataract eye surgeries the topic anaesthesia. Refractive error:
• To create alliances with Hospital San Felipe and healthy schools programme to have a suitable refractive error programme. Look also for donation of glasses for the children detected.
Centro Cristiano de servicios Humanitarios de honduras (CCSHH)
• To try to find good community leaders in order to better organize the brigades
• To organize brigades frequently • To implement a “counsellor service” at the clinic
Refractive error:
• Increase funding for glasses Lion’s Club la Fraternidad.
• Establish alliances with community leaders for the community eye health • Training social promoters • Include teachers in a refractive errors programme.
VIII – Recommendations
• To provide stronger support to the National Committee V2020 from IAPB, in order to involve key people and local authorities.
• To establish alliances and team work for the PBL activities. • To promote at university level the ophthalmology residence programme in
order to have more local resources available. Training at different levels is also needed. Advisers strongly recommended promoting the ophthalmology resident programme (to admit more doctors) or to open a new residence programme in SPS, due to the real need of having specialized human resources in the country.
• For the following CEH events, have to better selection of participants, looking for stronger commitment in terms of time and plans.
Fecha: 8/8/2001 Evento:
CEH Course Honduras
Fecha evento: 08-11 October, 2008
Lugar: Tegucigalpa, Honduras
PARTICIPANTES:
Nombre Apellidos Organización
1 Sra Judith de Zelaya COVA
2 Dra. Eyda Calero SUPRECO
3 Lic. James Bahr Club de Leones la Fraternidad
4 Dr. Celeo Ramírez Hospital General San Felipe
5 Dr. Ricardo Javier Toro Pineda Servicio de Oftalmología Hospital General San
Felipe
6 Dr. Sandro Angelo Murcia Hospital General San Felipe
7 Dr. Marco Aurelio Robles Villela
8 Dr. Eduardo Flores Centro Oftalmológico Vida Abundante
9 Dra. Mayra Ochoa Centro Oftalmológico Vida Abundante
10 Dr. Diego Mejia
11 Dr. María del Carmen Sevilla Hernandez
Depto de Atencion Integral a la Persona con Discapacidad / Secretaria de Salud de Honduras
12 Ing. Luis Alonso Prudoth Club de Leones la Fraternidad
13 Dr. Franco Emérito Pacheco Barahona Club de Leones la Fraternidad
14 Marlen Dinora Brevé Sanchéz
Asistente Técnico del Programa Escuelas Saludables, PES asignada al dpto. de Francisco
Morazán
15 Dra. María Teresa López López Secretaria de Salud y PREPACE
16 Dr. Kevin Miller Centro Cristiano de Servicios Humanitarios de
Honduras (CCSHH)
17 Camilo Alberto Bueso Centro Cristiano de Servicios Humanitarios de
Honduras (CCSHH)
18 Carlos Jalil Cabrera Alvarado Centro Cristiano de Servicios Humanitarios de
Honduras (CCSHH)
19 Dra. Doris Alvarado Hospital General San Felipe
20 Dra. Gabriela Guisselle López Chieza Hospital General San Felipe
21 Dra. Luisa Amanda Rojas Club de leones Comayaguela y Hospital San felipe
22 Dra. Belinda Rivera Gómez Hospital General San Felipe
23 Dr. Luis Alberto Lagos COVA, Hospital San Felipe
24 Dra. Elisa Regalado del Corral Oftalmocentro
FACILITADORES/ PONENTES
Nombre Apellidos
1 Dr. Pedro Gómez
2 Dr. Colin Cook
3 Dr. Felipe Chiriboga
Jueves 09 de Octubre del 2008 Thursday, October 9th., 2008
Hora / Time Tema Topics
09:00 09:10 10 minutos Resumen del día anterior Summary of previous day
09:10 09:40 30 minutos
Presentación de los grupos de trabajo del día
anterior sobre proyecto de catarata Groups presentations (cataract Project)
Presentación de proyectos Presentation of Projects supported by CBM
09:40 09:50 10 minutos P.2191 Centro Oftalmológico Vida Abundante P.2191 Centro Oftalmológico Vida Abundante
09:50 10:00 10 minutos P.979 Hospital de Ojos La Fraternidad P.979 Hospital de Ojos La Fraternidad
10:00 10:10 10 minutos
P.1968 Centre Cristiano de Servicios
Humanitarios de Honduras
P.1968 Centre Cristiano de Servicios
Humanitarios de Honduras
10:10 10:30 20 minutos Comentarios Comments
10:30 11:00 30 minutos ¿Cómo podemos aumentar el núm. de cirugías? How can we increase the number of surgeries?
11:00 11:30 30 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
11:30 12:15 45 minutos
Salud Ocular Comunitaria: Recurso Humano
para manejar un proyecto con alto volumen
CEH: Human resources to manage a high
volume project
Miércoles, 08 de Octubre del 2008 Wednesday, October 8th., 2008
Hora / Time Duration Tema Topics
09:00 09:10 10 minutos Bienvenida Welcome
09:10 09:20 10 minutos Objetivos y Metodología del curso objectives and methodology of the
09:20 09:40 20 minutos Presentación de los participantes Presentation of participants
09:40 10:30 50 minutos
Ceguera en el mundo y en Latinoamérica:
concepto, magnitud y causas
Global Blindness and Blindness in Latin
American: definitions, magnitude and causes
10:30 11:00 30 minutos
¿Qué esta haciendo la Sociedad Hondureña de
Oftalmología en prevención de Ceguera?
Activities of the Sociedad Hondureña de
Oftalmología
11:00 11:30 30 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
11:30 12:00 30 minutos
¿Qué está haciendo el MSP en Prevención de
Ceguera?, políticas y programas. Eye Health Policies and programmes
12:30 13:30 60 minutos Catarata: TCC y control de calidad Cataract: CSR rate and quality control
13:30 15:00 90 minutos Almuerzo-Comida Lunch
15:00 15:30 30 minutos Flujo de pacientes Patients flow
15:30 16:00 30 minutos Costos de cirugía de catarata Costs of Cataract Surgery
16:00 16:30 30 minutos
Asociación Nacional Visión 2020. Actividades y
planes ASONAVIH (vision 2020) Activities and plans
16:30 16:50 20 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
16:50 17:20 30 minutos Monitoreo de resultados en cirugías de catarata Monitoring of cataract surgeries
17:20 18:00 40 Minutos Trabajo en Grupo sobre Cataratas Group exercise (cataract)
12:15 13:30 75 minutos
Foro: Tecnología Apropiada: cirugía de catarata
(Faco Vs Sics) Appropriate technology (based on outcomes)
13:30 15:00 90 minutos Almuerzo Lunch
15:00 15:30 30 minutos Barreras en la detección de pacientes con catarata Barriers in detection of patients with cataract
15:30 16:00 30 minutos CBM: Visión 2010 CBM Vision 2010
16:00 16:30 30 minutos Errores Refractivos-Salud Escolar Refractive Errors- School eye health
16:30 16:50 20 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
16:50 17:00 10 minutos Comentarios Comments
17:00 18:00 60 minutos
Trabajo en grupo para un programa de salud
visual escolar
Group exercise (Eye health programme in
schools)
Viernes 10 de Octubre del 2008 Friday, October 10th., 2008
Hora / Time Tema Topics
09:00 10:00 1 hora
Ceguera Infantil : Definición, magnitud y causas
Xeroftalmía, catarata, ROP, enfermedades
genéticas y anormalidades congénitas)
Childhood Blindness: definition, magnitude and
causes
10:00 10:30 30 minutos ROP en Honduras ROP in Honduras
10:30 11:00 30 minutos
Cómo se planean los servicios para combatir la
ceguera infantil en el plan V2020
Planning services for V2020 (childhood
blindness)
11:00 11:30 30 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
11:30 12:00 30 minutos Baja Visión Low Vision
12:00 12:40 40 minutos Retinopatía Diabética: definición y magnitud Diabetic Retinopathy: definition and magnitude
12:40 13:10 30 minutos Casos de detección Screening for diabetic retinopathy
13:10 13:30 20 minutos Manejo gerencial Management
13:30 15:00 90 minutos Comida Lunch
15:00 15:35 35 minutos Grupo de trabajo en Retinopatía diabética Grooup excercise: Diabetic Retinopathy
15:35 15:50 15 minutos
Cambios en la calidad de vida de los pacientes
operados Changes in quality of life: patients
15:50 16:20 30 minutos
Perfil del trabajador comunitario. Trabajo en el
campo
Job description of Community workers. Work in
the field
16:20 16:40 20 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
16:40 17:10 30 minutos Glaucoma: definición y magnitud Glaucoma: definition and magnitude
17:10 17:25 15 minutos Detección temprana de Glaucoma Early detection (glaucoma)
17:25 18:00 35 minutos
Presentación de otros proyectos no apoyados
por CBM Projects presentations others that CBM projects
Sábado 11 de Octubre del 2008 Saturday, October 11th., 2008
Hora / Time Tema Topics
08:00 8:30
30 minutos
Programas de residencia de oftalmología en
Honduras. Curriculum Residence programmes
8:30 9:00 30 minutos Plan Nacional de Prevención de Ceguera: metas National Plan in Prevention of Blindness:
concretas y compromisos. (Trabajo en Grupos) concrete goals and commitments (group
exercises)
09:00 10:00 60 minutos
Presentación de resultados de grupos sobre metas y
compromisos Presentation of group exercises
10:00 10:30 30 minutos
Administración eficiente en programas médicos
sociales Efficient management in social programme
10:30 11:00 30 minutos Refrigerio Coffee Break
11:00 11:30 30 minutos Resumen, conclusiones Summary and Conclusions
11:30 12:00 30 minutos Cómo solicitar apoyo a CBM How to request support from CBM
12:00 12:30 30 minutos Entrega de diplomas y clausura Certificates and closing sessions
Course of Community Eye Health to students of the Residency Program accredited by the
Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO) for the South – Southeast Regions
Centro de Estudos Moacyr Álvaro, Federal University of São Paulo
São Paulo, Brazil October 20-24, 2008
The course took place in Luis Carlos Reys building, Centro de Estudos Moacyr Álvaro, in São Paulo, São Paulo State - Brazil from October 20-24. The course was organized by Andrea Zin, Celia Nakanami, and the CBO, it was sponsored by CBM, Sightsavers International and ORBIS through the IAPB, City Junior, Latinofarma, Genentech, Óticas Giardini. . Background
In October 2005, 28 participants from 11 residency programs, representing the whole country, attended a meeting in Brasilia to discuss including Community Eye Health in the Brazilian ophthalmology residency program. At the end of that workshop it was suggested that a five day course in Community Eye Health for ophthalmology residents should be developed, and that Celia Nakanami should be trained at the Diploma Course in Community Eye Health at LSHTM in 2006. In November 2006 the second workshop took place in Sao Paulo, where the Brazilian ophthalmologists who were present in that meeting decided who was going to prepare the lectures, and the division of the time table for the course. The meeting also decided to send Roberta Ventura (from Altino Ventura Foundation), to the Diploma Course in Community Eye Health at LSHTM in 2007. Roberta Ventura would be responsible for organizing courses in the North-East region, based in Recife, and Celia Nakanami would take responsibility for courses in the South-East, based in Sao Paulo. In December 2007 another seminar was held in Campinas – Sao Paulo – where the ophthalmologists presented the lectures. Dr Rainald Duerksen was present at this meeting. The dates for the courses were planned - May in Recife and October in Sao Paulo. In May 2008, the first Course of Community Eye Health to students of the Residency Programs accredited by the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO) for the North – Northeast Regions was held in Recife. There were represented 70% of residency programs of the region (twenty two residents from 7 residency programs). The experience of residents developing a Project/Program was really good. The working group activity was the most valuable part of the course. Aim and Objectives The student should have knowledge of: the VISION 2020 initiative, steps and tools to be used for an action plan and strategies to develop an eye care project/program based in the VISION 2020 program. Topics covered
• Basic epidemiology and basic statistics • Research methodology/ RACSS/RAAB • Assessing the disease in the community/Resources/Disease Control Strategies/ Monitoring
(cataract, refractive errors, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, childhood blindness, trachoma, low vision)
• Leadership/ Management of programmes • Planning V2020 programs
Facilitators Dr Miriam Cano, Asunción, Paraguay Dr. Celia Nakanami, UNIFESP Dr. Marinho Scarpi, UNIFESP Dr. Paulo Henrique Morales, UNIFESP Dr. Norma Medina, São Paulo State Health Secretariat
Dr Silvia Kitadai, UNISA Dr João Marcello Furtado, USP-Ribeirão Preto Dr Carlos Arieta, UNICAMP Dr Andrea Zin, IFF/FIOCRUZ
Invited Speakers Dr Pedro Carricondo, USP
Dr Gelse Beatriz Monteiro, UNICAMP Dr Rosa Graziano, USP
Participants Thirty four residents from 25 residency programs from the South-Southeast regions attended the course. Seventy percent of residency programs accredited by the CBO were represented (Appendix 1). Eighty percent were second year residents.
Programme Prof Paulo Augusto de Arruda Melo, CBO coordinator of the teaching committee and Professor of Federal University of Sao Paulo, gave a warm welcome. The lectures were given as planned in the attached timetable (Appendix 2). Dr Miriam Cano introduced IAPB and V2020 program The “Definition of visual impairment (blindness and low vision)” lecture, using the classification adopted by ICD-10-WHO was included to reinforce basic concepts. After the morning lectures, students were divided into four groups and they were required to perform exercises according to the topic covered during the morning. Leadership and marketing/advocacy concepts were given by Dr Scarpi and Graziano. In the last day they were required to develop a V2020 project/program for a population of 1,000,000 inhabitants which should be presented in the last day. The program should include detailed analysis of the needs, an assessment of existing resources, a simple budget and detailed objectives. The facilitators helped all groups as tutors. The working group activity continued every afternoon for the remainder of the course. All the groups presented their project/program in PowerPoint presentations on the last day, and were questioned in detail about their proposals by both the faculty and other course participants Conclusions
1. A total of 56 residents (48% of the total number of 2nd year residents) attended the 2 courses (Recife and São Paulo) organised in 2008.
2. Standardization of lectures is still a challenge. Lectures improved since the course in Recife. Clinical aspects decreased but still there is a need to increase the emphasis on CEH aspects. Facilitators need to revise presentations to standardize content. Dr Zin will revise them with Dr Medina in December 2008 and will send to facilitators for further comments.
3. Participants were very motivated by group work activities, although in the beginning they felt the exercises were not challenging. Majority of residents were familiar with epidemiology concepts and differences between presenting VA and best-corrected VA.
4. Leadership and marketing concepts were also very well accepted. 5. Project/programs were very comprehensive, with well developed situational analysis.
However very clear during presentations the need to reinforce concepts of aim, objectives and activities. Good development of indicators for monitoring, evaluation strategies developed, some with chronogram and detailed budget
6. Participants feedback: concepts given by the course are useful not only for CEH, but also can be applicable in all areas.
Recommendations
1. To keep the 2 courses for 2009, and possibly plan a 3rd one 2. To develop standardized exercises with CEH basic concepts to assure necessary concepts to
be available 3. To discuss with CBO course funding possibilities to assure sustainability 4. To organize a session during the next Brazilian congress a CEH CBO committee session with
the purpose of discussing projects/programmes being developed 5. To organize CEH allumini during next CBO congresses
Appendix 1 – List of participants
Name Residency programme/State Email
São Paulo
Fabio Marques do Nascimento USP-Ribeirão Preto [email protected]
Flavio Koji Narazaki USP-Ribeirão Preto [email protected]
Marliene Oliveira Leme FMJ- Jundiai [email protected]
Silvia Taddei Herculano FMJ Jundiai [email protected]
Cintia Tullio Fernades FMJ Jundiai [email protected]
Debora de Oliveira Lomba FAMEMA-Marilia [email protected]
Lusa Reis Silva Unisa - Sao Paulo [email protected]
Rafael de Melo Franco Unisa - Sao Paulo [email protected]
Ismael Augusto Ostetto Inst. Penido Burnier - Campinas [email protected]
Mariana Sbrana Alves de Souza UNICAMP [email protected]
Fernando Perches Santa Casa - SP [email protected]
Adriana Valim Portes Santa Casa - SP [email protected]
Flavia Pelinsari Lana HSPE- SP [email protected]
Mayana Freitas Lopes HOS - Soracaba [email protected]
Elisa Biesdorf Thiesen HOS - Soracaba [email protected]
Luis Gustavo Biteli UNIFESP - SP [email protected]
Aline Silveira Moriyama UNIFESP - SP [email protected]
Frederico Fernandes Loss Unesp - Botucatu [email protected]
Pablo Felipe Rodrigues UMC CEO Pacheco [email protected]
Lucas Maradei UMC CEO Pacheco [email protected]
Minas Gerais
Luis Felipe da Silva Alves Carneiro Santa Casa - BH [email protected]
Bruno Oliveira Borges HC-UFMG [email protected]
Danilo da Costa Sousa UFTM Uberaba MG [email protected]
Rio de Janeiro
Roberta Piccin Ferreira Inst. Benjamin Constant - RJ [email protected]
Renato Patuzzo Inst. Benjamin Constant - RJ [email protected]
Gustavo Bonfadini UFRJ [email protected]
Rafael Correa de Almeida Oculistas Associados -CEPOA - RJ [email protected]
Beatriz Machado Fontes UERJ [email protected]
Parana
Luisa Moreira Hopker UFPR - Curitiba [email protected]
Luciana Augusta Raposo UEL - Londrina [email protected]
Santa Catarina
Rosa Maria Tasmo Costa Hospital Regional de Sao Jose/SC [email protected]
Rio Grande do Sul
Douglas Haeser Weiss Banco de Olhos Porto Alegre [email protected]
Almir Sabrosa Santa casa - Porto Alegre [email protected]
Ticiana Granzotto Inst. Ivo Correa Meyer - PA [email protected] Appendix 2 - Timetable DAY 1 8:00- 8:10 Welcome Prof Paulo Augusto Arruda Melo 8:10 – 8:45 Vision 2020 Miriam Cano 8:45 – 10:00 Epidemiology-Basic Concepts Marinho Scarpi 10:15- 10:30 Break 10:30-11:30 Epidemiology of Blindness Miriam Cano 11:30 – 12:30 Statistics Marinho Scarpi 12:30 – 14:00 Lunch 13:30 – 16:00 Research Methodology Andrea Zin 16:00- 16:15 Break 16:15- 18:00 Research Methodology (RAAB,
RACSS) Miriam Cano
Acessing Diseases in the Community Strategy for Control of Diseases Monitoring DAY 2 – Cataract/Refractive Errors 8:00- 10:30 Cataract Arieta/Miriam Cano/Arnaud
Araujo Filho 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45- 12:15 Refractive Errors Pedro Carricondo/Denise
Fornazari 12:15- 13:45 Lunch
DAY 3-Glaucoma/Diabetic Retinopathy 08:00 – 9:30 Diabetic Retinopathy Paulo Henrique Morales 9:30-9:45 Break 9:45:11:15 Glaucoma Miriam Cano/Carlos Arieta 11:15-11:30 Break 11:30 – 12:30 Resources available: SUS NGOs
Resource mobilization Paulo Henrique Morales Silvia Kitadai Miriam Cano
12:30 – 14:00 Lunch 14:00 – 15:00 Leadership
Human Resources 1 Marinho Scarpi
15:00-16:00 Group Work * 16:00 – 16:15 Break 16:15- 18:00 Group Work presentation ** DAY 4 Childhood Blindness/Trachoma/Low Vision 8:00- 8:45 Childhood Blindness Silvia Kitadai/Denise Fornazari 8:45 – 9:30 Trachoma Norma Medina 9:30- 10:15 Low Vision Keila Miriam/Celia Nakanami 10:15-10:30 Break 10:30-12:00 Leadership
Human Resources 2 Marinho Scarpi
12:00-13:30 Lunch 14:00-15:00 Group Work * 15:00-15:15 Break 15:15 – 17:15 Group Work presentation ** DAY 5 Plan your project!!!!
14:00 – 15:30 Group Work * 15:30-15:50 Break 15:50 – 17:30 Group Work presentation **
08:00 – 09:45 How to plan ( HERE- THERE) Miriam Cano 09:45- 10:00 Break 10:00-12:30 Group work 12:30 – 14:00 Lunch 14:00 – 15:30 Group work 15:30- 17:00 Group work presentations 17:00 Closing and certificates
REPORT ON THE THIRD COURSE IN COMMUNITY EYE HEALTH
MANAGEMENT
Asuncion, Paraguay, Oct 30th – Nov 7
th 2008
An event organized by Fundación Visión and the International Agency for the Prevention of
Blindness (IAPB) Latin America.
1. Introduction: This is the third course of this type offered in our region, and it received generous financing from the regional CBM offices, the International Centre for Eye Health
(ICEH), IAPB Latin America, and Alcon Laboratories. Locally, SER Group International,
Ciba Vision-Comfar, DGR Internacional, and La Santaniana Bus Company supported the
course with several items and transportation. The organization was planned and executed
by Nydia Silva, BA, Cristina Caballero, BA and Dr. Fernando Pena, with the support of
Dr. Van Lansingh from VISION 2020 Latin America. The course was taught by a
recognized group of experienced faculty. The teaching methods consisted of lectures,
group work, structured assignments, and self-learning. At the end of the course,
participants had the opportunity to witness successful fieldwork in a community that
regularly holds eye surgical campaigns.
2. Background: The international course in CEH management is widely known among
various institutions in Latin America and has been a core element for the appropriate
development of projects in the prevention of blindness, according to the reports from some
of the participants to previous courses.
3. Setting and Program: This year, 21 participants joined the course from diverse Latin
American countries such as Mexico, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Puerto Rico, Peru, Colombia,
Bolivia, Chile, Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay.
One of the major innovations of this course was the establishment of three module sections
according to the composition of project cycles in management: Module 1, project design
and marketing; Module 2, finances and accounting; and Module 3, human resources and
ethics. This design allowed the participants to obtain broad spectrum understanding that a
health care provider and manager needs in order to develop a sustainable project. The
course was targeted at administrators of community eye health projects, who are expected
to play an important role in the future, for the purpose of providing them with the tools to
achieve sustainability and the means with which to perform planning of services within the
framework of the recommendations for development of a national eye health plan.
Module 1: PLANNING AND MARKETING
Aim: Learn how to begin a project.
Participants were able to generate ideas on how to create a project, and received practical
tools for the planning and carrying out of eye health initiatives based on their actual reality
and resources. This enabled participants to make decisions and design strategic planning.
Lectures and workshops for this Module: Epidemiology, global blindness: cost and
ocular assistance, community eye health, Vision 2020 global and Latin America,
advocacy, benchmarking, strategic planning on community eye health project, marketing,
and networking to pursue a sustainable blindness prevention program, and surgical
campaigns
Module 2: ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE
Aim: learn how to finance and administrate a project.
Participants were provided with practical tools to measure financial feasibility of the
project, generate the necessary administrative processes in order to implement the project,
and tools for monitoring and evaluation.
Lectures and workshops for this Module: Sustainability of the project, basic finances,
cost and available tools, project cycle management, quality management and control,
fundraising, the Aravind experience, and how to purchase and maintain equipment.
Module 3: HUMAN RESOURCES
Aim: Learn how to manage human resources.
Participants were provided with effective tools to achieve better human resources
management, including selection, recruitment, organization, and evaluation, as well as
tools for better rapport with colleagues and employers, and personal growth.
Lectures and workshops for this Module: Ethics in health management, leadership and
teamwork, time management, motivation, successful communication, human resources
management, and performance evaluation.
4. The course was intended for: Physicians, ophthalmologists, nurses, administrative
personnel, and managers of eye-health programs.
5. Objectives: To train participants, so that upon completing the course they are able to:
a. Prepare a project according to the guidelines of a VISION 2020 district plan and
participate with the committees of their respective countries in the formulation of a
national eye health plan in order to fulfill the objectives set forth in the May 2003
resolution of the World Health Assembly, and to use the resolution of May 2006 for
advocacy activities within their respective governments in relation to the assignment of
resources to this priority area.
b. Utilize administrative, accounting, and marketing techniques to improve programs or
generate new ones, evaluate progress, and apply corrective measures.
c. Offer presentations on priority pathologies supported by the didactic materials provided,
organize advocacy meetings, and attempt to introduce CEH to training programs.
d. Maintain a network of contacts in various countries for mutual assistance and support for
preparation of activities to be carried out.
Program, Participants, Faculty and Organizing Committee: (See Annexes 1 and 2)
Results Related to Objectives
(1) All participants were given the information needed to prepare a project according to the
VISION 2020 district plan and participate with the committees of their respective countries in
the formulation of a National Eye Health Plan in accord with the objectives set forth in May
2003 resolution of the World Health Organization (WHO). They were also shown the
methods by which they can perform advocacy with their governments and other government
entities and comply with the WHO resolution of May 2006.
Various exercises were carried out after the lectures to critically analyze the existing situation
in each of the major causes of blindness and the projects needed to create or improve the eye
health care in the region, with special emphasis in community work. The sessions were
dynamic, and we consider that the participants will be able to influence their respective
communities and local governments for the development or improvement of existing projects.
(2) The participants were also provided with the administrative, accounting, and marketing
techniques needed to improve programs, evaluate progress, and apply corrective measures.
These sessions generated a great deal of interest, and with the assistance of the speakers and
organizers, as well as some participants with knowledge in the field, many ideas were
generated related to sustainability, increased coverage, and quality of service.
(3) With the support of the didactic materials provided, they will be able to offer
presentations on priority diseases, organize advocacy meetings, and introduce CEH into
training programs.
All the participants received electronic and printed copies of the educational materials in both
English and Spanish, as well as various references available on the Internet, to be used in
their respective institutions and other forums within their countries.
(4) They were also given information about all the participants and organizations involved so
that they could create a network of contacts in the various countries that could provide them
with pertinent advice, and support and assistance in developing selected projects.
Other Results:
(1) Fundación Visión reinforced the alliance with the Universidad del Pacífico, also of Paraguay, to permit the issuance of certificates of participation worth academic credit,
something made possible by the fact that the university is listed with the WHO world
directory of medical schools and the Foundation for the Advancement of International
Medical Education and Research (FAIMER).
(2) The teachings shared by some speakers about their experience with other successful
projects in prevention of blindness and with excellent management were of great
importance to demonstrate what can be accomplished in the eye-care field with the
proper management of human, equipment, and economic resources.
(3) The event met with very little success financially, in particular due to the devaluation
of the dollar, which resulted in no income for the organization.
(4) Just as in the previous year, the opening of the course was very interesting, thanks to the participation of Dr. Serge Resnikoff of the WHO and Dr. Dipankar Datta of
Aravind in India, whose presentations were impeccable and dynamic.
Lessons Learned:
(1) This year, organization of the course was prepared and held by experienced personnel in Paraguay, who coordinated the logistic and academic aspects of the course. All the
contact function was left to the IAPB LA Office.
(2) It was observed that forming groups of persons who are Spanish-speaking is a useful
strategy to help avoid the expenses and problems arising from the need for
interpretation and translation. This was particularly important because all the
participants from Brazil understood and were able to communicate in Spanish.
(3) Once again there were difficulties with securing a visa for our guest from India.
Although we began the process early, there was a last moment impasse due to the fact
that the programmed speaker became ill the week prior to the event. However with a
phone call to the Paraguayan embassy in India, the situation was resolved.
(4) One speaker (Carlos Coscia) could not reach to Paraguay due to personal matters. His
conference was covered by local speakers.
(5) We realized that one day is enough time for the participants to spend on the surgical
campaign, especially because the aim of the course is oriented more to management
and administration of community eye health projects than to the basic conduct of
surgical brigades. We suggest that for the future events, presenting a video about the
organization of a surgical campaign in Paraguay should be considered.
(6) This time the course had a duration of 9 days, and we consider that it was appropriate
and should not be longer than 10 days for future courses.
(7) The curriculum and presenters should be confirmed by the end of April for the next
course so as to avoid logistical problems.
(8) The course should be promoted by various means from the beginning of 2009.
(9) The logistical aspects of lodging, tourism, and travel should remain the responsibility
of trusted travel agents, as was done this time.
Evaluation and Suggestions from Course Participants:
ASSESSMENT OF THE THIRD COURSE ON MANAGEMENT OF COMMUNITY
EYE HEALTH, OCT. 30 – NOV. 7, 2008
Results of the survey done with both multiple choice and open questions:
Of the 21 participants, 20 responded that the knowledge acquired in the course would be
useful to them, and all 21 said that the course provided all the tools needed to manage their
projects in the future.
The pathologies on which they most wished to work for prevention of blindness are cataract,
refractive error, ROP, and diabetic retinopathy. Only 4 participants mentioned glaucoma.
They liked and had a positive impression of all the conferences, but those most frequently
mentioned were those by Aravind (Dr. Datta), Colin Cook, motivation, ethics, advocacy,
fundraising, and time management.
In general, they said that none of the conferences failed to make a good impression, but
repeatedly said that those on equipment maintenance were the least impressive or least useful.
Five (5) participants said that the conferences in English were of little use, but the remaining
16 said they were very useful.
All were very satisfied by the services of the hotel and the travel agency except for one
person whose name had been gotten wrong, and one other who said that there had been little
variety in the food. Some mentioned that they would have liked more time for shopping.
All were satisfied with the logistical organization, the simultaneous interpretation, and the
organization of the conferences.
All said they would recommend the course to colleagues and friends.
The primary suggestions made for the future were:
1. To provide a guide text or reference work
2. To have more practical examples during the conference, with more workshop
activities.
3. To consider having the course in another country due to the difficulty most had in
traveling to Paraguay.
4. To do follow up of former students and show the results of other projects.
5. To keep up contacts among all involved.
All the participants were generally happy with the organization of the course, including the
academic content, lodging, facilities, the schedule, and the logistical set up for the various
events at the hotel and elsewhere.
I personally heard no complaint from any of the participants except for that of being tired by
the end of it, and all participants agreed that the course should not be made longer than this
year’s.
It must be remembered that this is not a workshop on community eye health itself, and so
participants do not expect much training on blindness prevention programs or eye diseases,
since most, not to say all, are in any case ophthalmologists and have participated in various
workshops on prevention of blindness and community eye health in their respective
countries.
It would therefore be useful in the future to make a clear distinction between those courses
more oriented toward prevention of blindness and carrying out specific programs for
individual eye diseases, and those with more management oriented content, such as those we
offered on this occasion.
Finally, the organization of the course in modules allowed both improved organization of the
conferences and workshops and better understanding and learning by the participants.
PROGRAMA ACADEMICO
MODULO DISERTANTE
8:00 - 9:00 Duerksen / Lansingh / Cibils / Peña
9:00 - 10:00 V. Lansingh
10:00 -10:30
10.30 -11:00 1 S. Resnikoff
11:00 - 12:00 1 S. Resnikoff
12:00 - 13:00
13:00 - 14:00 1 D. Datta
14:00 - 15:00 1 D. Datta
15:00 - 15:30
15:30 - 16:30 1 R. Brown
16:30 - 17:30 2 F. Yee
17:30 - 18:30 2 D. Datta
CAFÉ
Marketing
Marketing
ACTIVIDAD
Jueves 30 de Octubre
Vision 2020
Aspectos de la salud mundial
Inauguracion y presentacion de participantes
III CURSO INTERNACIONAL DE GERENCIAMIENTO
EN SALUD OCULAR COMUNITARIA
30 octubre al 7 de Noviembre
Asunción, Paraguay
CAFÉ
Ceguera, Costos y Asistencia Social
ALMUERZO
Calidad de servicios - (software de Guatemala)
Calidad en Salud Ocular Comunitaria
Alianzas estrategicas
8:00 - 9:00 1 F. Peña
9:00 - 10:00 1 Datta/Yee/Duerksen/Contreras
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 1 Datta/Yee/Duerksen/Contreras
11:30 - 12:30 1 Datta/Yee/Duerksen/Contreras
12:30 - 13:30
13:30 - 14:30 2 Colin Cook
14:30 - 15:30 2 Colin Cook
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 17:00 2 D. Datta
17:00 - 18:00 1 D. Datta / F. Yee
Benchmarking - mesa redonda
Gerenciamiento de proyectos en SOC
Analisis de costos en un proyecto de SOC
CAFÉ
Viernes 31 de Octubre
Benchmarking - mesa redonda
Atencion Primaria en Salud - Atencion Ocular Primaria
ALMUERZO
Sustentabilidad de un proyecto
Benchmarking - mesa redonda
Planeacion de servicios a nivel Distrital
CAFÉ
8:00 - 9:00 1 F. Peña
9:00 - 10:00 1 F. Barria
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 2 F. Yee
11:30 - 12:30 2 D. Ciccone / O. Benitez
12:30 - 13:30 2 D. Ciccone / O. Benitez
13:30 - 14:30
Sabado 01 de Noviembre
ALMUERZO
Finanzas para no financieros
Epidemiologia en Prevencion de la ceguera
Cabildeo en el desarrollo de proyectos de SOC
CAFÉ
Finanzas en un proyecto de Salud Ocular Comunitaria
Finanzas para no financieros
ANNEX 1: PROGRAM AND FACULTY
8:00 - 9:00 1 César González (CBM)
9:00 - 10:00 1 César González (CBM)
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 1 César González (CBM)
11:30 - 12:30 1 César González (CBM)
12:30 - 13:30
13:30 - 14:30 1 César González (CBM)
14:30 - 15:30 1 César González (CBM)
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 17:00 1 César González (CBM)
17:00 - 18:00 3 C. Coscia
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
Lunes 03 de Noviembre
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
CAFÉ
CAFÉ
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
ALMUERZO
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
Responsabilidad Social en oftalmologia
Ciclo de Gerenciamiento de un Proyecto
8:00 - 9:00 2 F. Frydman
9:00 - 10:00 2 F. Frydman
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 2 F. Frydman
11:30 - 12:30 2 F. Frydman
12:30 - 13:30
13:30 - 14:30 1 R. Duerksen
14:30 - 15:30 1 P. Cibils
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 17:00 1 M. Cano
17:00 - 18:00 1 M. Cano
Consecusion de fondos
CAFÉ
Programa de PBL en catarata y glaucoma
Programa de PBL en retinopatia diabetica
Consecusion de fondos
Consecusion de fondos
Consecusion de fondos
Martes 04 de Noviembre
ALMUERZO
CAFÉ
Programa de PBL en ROP
Salud Ocular Comunitaria y ONGs en la region
8:00 - 9:00 Dpto. Administrativo
9:00 - 10:00 Dpto. Administrativo
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 Dpto. Administrativo
11:30 - 12:30 Dpto. Administrativo
12:30 - 13:30
13:30 - 14:30 1 V. Lansingh, F. Pena, R. Duerksen
14:30 - 15:30 1 V. Lansingh, , M. Cano, F. Pena
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 17:00 2 H. Marais
17:00 - 18:00 2 D. Guggliotta
Visita a la Fundacion Vision
CAFÉ
Miercoles 05 de Noviembre
ALMUERZO
Visita a la Fundacion Vision - INGAVI
Taller SOC (datos de cada pais)
CAFÉ
Visita a la Fundacion Vision - INGAVI
Mantenimiento, compras y gestion de equipos
Visita a la Fundacion Vision
Taller SOC (datos de cada pais)
Costos, herramientas disponibles
8:00 - 9:00 3 F. Peña
9:00 - 10:00 3 J. Mendoza
10:00 - 10:30
10:30 - 11:30 3 N. Silva
11:30 - 12:30 3 N. Silva
12:30 - 13:30
13:30 - 14:30 3 D. Ciccone
14:30 - 15:30 3 D. Ciccone
15:30 - 16:00
16:00 - 17:00 3 M. Vergara
17:00 - 18:00 1 E. Nuñez
CAFÉ
Jueves 06 de Noviembre
Administracion del Tiempo
Administracion del Tiempo - Taller
ALMUERZO
Etica en salud
Organizacion de una camapaña Qx en Paraguay
Evaluacion de desempeño
Seleccion y contratacion de RH
CAFÉ
Motivacion y trabajo en equipo
Motivacion y trabajo en equipo - Taller
05:00 Clínica Belén - Coronel Oviedo
7:00- 8:00
08:30
9:00 - 10:00
10:00 - 11:00
11:00 - 11:30
11:30 - 13:00
13:00 - 14:00
14:00 - 16:00
Cirugia
ALMUERZO
CAFÉ
Viernes 07 de Noviembre
Salida a Coronel Oviedo - CAMPAÑA QUIRURGICA
Desayuno Km 84
Regreso
Llegada Coronel Oviedo Clínica Belén
Area de Consulta
Area Administrativa y Financiera
1 Módulo 1: Proyectos y Mercadeo
2 Módulo 2: Finanzas y Administración
3 Módulo 3: Recursos Humanos
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE
Cristina Caballero Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
Fernando Pena Fundacion Vision Colombia [email protected]
Nydia Silva Fundacion Vision Colombia [email protected]
Van C. Lansingh IAPB Vision 2020 Argentina [email protected]
PARTICIPANTS
Sergio Velez, Dr Clinica Oftalmologica de Sucre Colombia [email protected]
Gonzalo Jaramillo, Dr Proyecto independiente Colombia [email protected]
Germano Leitao de Andrade, Dr Concilio Brasilero de Oft Brasil [email protected]
Otavio Siqueira Bisneto, Dr Concilio Brasilero de Oft Brasil [email protected]
Gustavo Henrique Araujo Salomao, Dr Concilio Brasilero de Oft Brasil [email protected]
Maria Isabel Lynch Gaete Concilio Brasilero de Oft Brasil [email protected]
Fernando Gómez, Dr Pdte Soc Colombiana de Oft Colombia [email protected]
Gustavo Rodriguez, Adm. Adm y Asesor Medico Bolivia [email protected]
Amelia Salvatierra, Dra. Salubrista, oftalmologa Nicaragua [email protected]
Sirley Vidal, Dra Centro de Salud Ntra Sra Pompeya Beni, Bolivia [email protected]
Manuel Perez Martinot, Dr Instituto de Ojos Sacro Cuore Lima, Perú [email protected]
Mauricio Perez Martinot, Adm Instituto de Ojos Sacro Cuore Lima, Perú [email protected]
Nelson Rivera, Adm International Center of Eye Educ EUA [email protected]
Napoleón Candray, Dr Clinica Candray El Salvador [email protected]
Edwin Arias, Dr Clinica Candray El Salvador [email protected]
Erika Oyola, Dra. Residencia Oftalmologica Nano Argentina [email protected]
Luis Emanuel Rodrigo, Dr La Rioja Argentina [email protected]
Armando Munoz, Dr Leones Mexico Mexico [email protected]
Victoria Moya, Enfermera Instituto Regional de Oft de Trujillo Trujillo, Peru [email protected]
Jeisson Castro, Dr Residencia Oft. Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
Patricia Lopez, Dra Residencia Oft. Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
SPEAKERS
Cesar Gonzalez CBM Peru [email protected]
Fernando Pena Fundacion Vision Colombia [email protected]
Nydia Silva Fundacion Vision Colombia [email protected]
Van C. Lansingh IAPB Vision 2020 Argentina [email protected]
Fernando Barria Vision 2020 America Latina Chile [email protected]
Daniel Ciccone SER Group Internacional Paraguay [email protected]
Jazmin Mendoza Jazmin Mendoza Consultora Paraguay [email protected]
Colin Cook CBM / Univ de Capetown Sudafrica [email protected]
Serge Resnikoff OMS Ginebra Suiza [email protected]
Rainald Duerksen Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
Raymond Brown Vision Paraguay Reino Unido [email protected]
Francisco Yee Visualiza Guatemala Guatema [email protected]
Francisco Contreras APO Peru [email protected]
Dukantar Datta Aranvind India [email protected]
Pablo Cibils Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
Miriam Cano Sociedad Pya de Oftalmologia Paraguay [email protected]
Daniel Gugliotta DG Internacional Paraguay [email protected]
Hendrik Marais Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
Edgar Nunez Fundacion Vision Paraguay [email protected]
APPENDIX 2: CONTACT INFORMATION AND HOME
COUNTRY OF PARTICIPANTS, SPEAKERS, AND THE
ORGANIZING COMMITTEE