REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it...

64
TH E C I TY OF S AN D IEGO REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION DATE ISSUED: ATTENTION: SUBJECT: OWNER! APPLICANT: SUMMARY May 15,2014 REPORT NO. PC-14-035 Planning Commission, Agenda of May 22, 2014 VERIZON WIRELESS - SATURN BLVD PROJECT NO. 348557, PROCESS 4 SPP Corp; Davis Jack W LLC; Krasnoff Albert W LLC Verizon Wireless Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) located at 595 Saturn Blvd in the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan area? Staff Recommendation(s): I. APPROVE Planned Development Permit (PDP) No. 1281819; and 2. APPROVE Coastal Development Permit (COP) No. 12818 18. Communitv Planning Group Recommendation: On March 12, 2014, the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Planning Group (OMNCPG) voted 6-3 to support the proposed WCF. According to the applicant, the only concern was in reference to the Radio Frequency/Emissions (Attachment 10). Environmental Review: This project is not pending an appeal of the environmental determination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made on April 7, 2014, and the opportunity to appeal that determination ended April21, 2014. This project was determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 19 Section 15303 (New Construction) (Attachment 7). Fiscal Impact Statement: None with this action. All cost associated with the processing of this project are paid from a deposit account maintained by the applicant. Code Enforcement Impact: None with this action.

Transcript of REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it...

Page 1: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

TH E C ITY OF S AN D IEGO

REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION

DATE ISSUED:

ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

OWNER! APPLICANT:

SUMMARY

May 15,2014 REPORT NO. PC-14-035

Planning Commission, Agenda of May 22, 2014

VERIZON WIRELESS - SA TURN BLVD PROJECT NO. 348557, PROCESS 4

SPP Corp; Davis Jack W LLC; Krasnoff Albert W LLC Verizon Wireless

Issue(s): Should the Planning Commission approve a Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) located at 595 Saturn Blvd in the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan area?

Staff Recommendation(s):

I. APPROVE Planned Development Permit (PDP) No. 12818 19; and

2. APPROVE Coastal Development Permit (COP) No. 12818 18.

Communitv Planning Group Recommendation: On March 12, 2014, the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Planning Group (OMNCPG) voted 6-3 to support the proposed WCF. According to the applicant, the only concern was in reference to the Radio Frequency/Emissions (Attachment 10).

Environmental Review: This project is not pending an appeal of the environmental determination. The environmental exemption determination for this project was made on April 7, 2014, and the opportunity to appeal that determination ended April21, 2014. This project was determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 19 Section 15303 (New Construction) (Attachment 7).

Fiscal Impact Statement: None with this action. All cost associated with the processing of this project are paid from a deposit account maintained by the appl icant.

Code Enforcement Impact: None with this action.

Page 2: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Housing Impact Statement: none with this action.

BACKGROUND

This project is an application for a PDP and CDP, consolidated Process 4, Planning Commission decision for a \Vireless Communication Facility (WCF). The project is proposed in a commercial plaza at 595 Saturn Blvd (Attachments 1,2, and 3). The project is located in the CC~2-3 zone within the Otay Mesa Nestor community planning area. WCFs arc permitted in commerciai zones as a Limited Usc however, the project consists oftvvo equiPment enclosures combined to exceed 250-square feet. Pursuant to Land Development Code \41.0420(g)(3), the project requires a Planned Development Pennit for the equipment enclosure deviation to exceed the 250-square feet requirement. LDC Sections 141.0420(g)(3) to process WCFs with the Neighborhood Development Permit (NDP) has yet to be certified by the Coastal Commission and therefore, cannot be applied to projects located within the Coastal Overlay Zone. The project is al~q_located_ within the Coastal Overlay Zone within the appealable area·an_d reqllltes a Coastal Development" Permit.

Project Description:

This WCF proposes to install sixteen (16) antennas and sixteen (16) Remote Radio Units (RRUs) completely concealed behind the rooftop parapet using Fiberglass Reinforced Panel (FRP) materials, painted and textured to match the building surface. 'lbc equipment associated with this project will be concealed inside a 253-square foot concrete block enclosure with stucco finish on a poured-in-place concrete pad. The enclosure includes a tile roof and will be painted to match the existing commercial building. An emergency generator will also be installed as part of this project inside a separate 144-squme foot equipment em:losure with a trellis roo1: and also painted to match the existing commercial building.

The WCF Regulations and Council Policy 600-43 encourage wireless providers to locate WCFs away from residential uses and other sensitive uses by providing lower permit process levels in commercial and industrial zones. As this particular project is located in a commercial zone, normally this would require a ministerial Process 1 review. However, applications for a PDP and a CDP are required because the project is located within a Coastal Overlay Zone (appealable area) and the proposed equipment enclosures exceed 250-square feet. Based on Verizon's justification letter, this site was one of three candidates that was a non-residential use within the search ring. This site was selected because it provided Verizon the opportunity to completely stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. Additionally, both the equipment enclosure and the generator enclosure are proposed in an area that contains existing landscaping for screening. The combination of the antenna design and the equipment enclosures location complies with the General Plan and the Wireless Communication Regulations.

WCFs are required to "use all reasonable means to conceal or minimize the visual impacts of the WCF through integration ... Integration with existing structures or among existing uses shall be accomplished through the use of architecture, landscape and siting solutions." In this case, the

- 2-

Page 3: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

antennas rnd t.1.e RRUs are completely hidden behind the rooftop parapet resulting in a fully integrated s-ite. The proposed equipment and generator are concealed inside two separate enclosures painted to match the existing commercial buildi:ag. Additionally, these equipmeEt locations are set back away from public views and screened with existing lmdscapbg. Communitv P]an Analysis:

\Vh:Ie the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan does not specifi.caiiy address WCFs, the City's Genercl Pla.'1 addresses WCF's in UD-A.15 as fo1lo\vs:

Minimize th.e visual impact of wireless facilities.

a) Conceal -wireless facilities in existing structures vvhen possible, otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques to hide or blend them into the surrounding area.

b) Design facilities to be aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context.

c) Conceal mecha..rllcal equipment and devices associated with wireless facilities in tmdergrou."1d vaults or unobtrusive structures.

This project complies with the Genera! Plan recommendations by 1) concealing the equipment associated ·Mth the antennas in two separate enclosures designed with features from the existing commercial b• .. lilding; and 2) locating the antennas and the RRUs behind the rooftop parapet usir.g FRP materials, painted and textured to match the existing building.

The Otay Mf.::sa Nestor Community Planning group voted 6-3 to support the proposed design O!l

:t>t~Iarch 12,2014. According to the applicant, three members of the planning group voted against the proposed project due to concerns of Radio frequency (RF) emissions. However, the Telecommunication Act of 1996 prohibits locatities to "regulate the placement, constmction, and modification of personal VV:reless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio flequency emissions to the extent that such facilit:es comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Verizon Wireless submitted an RF Report, which concluded that the project complies v,.ith the Federal Communication Commission's RF Standards,

Conclusion:

This project complies vvith the applicable regulations of the Land Development Code and the City's General Plan with the exception to LDC Section 141.0420(g)(3). The proposed deviation for two equipment enclosures combined to exceed 250-square feet can be supported by staff since each enclosure addresses the regulations requirement .for integration. Additionally, the proposed equipnent deviation would aHeviate concerns of a power outage by providing a backup power source during emergencies. For these reasons stafi supports the proposed project.

ALTERNATIVE

1. Approve Planned Development Permit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818, with modifications.

- 3 -

Page 4: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

2. Deny Planned Development Permit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit. 128:818, if the Planning Commis§ions makes written tindings based on substantial evidence that the approval is not authorized by state or loca~ zoning law.

Respectfully subn:.ittcd,

\ --. Mike Westlake Assistant Deputy Director Development Services Depa..'i:ment

Attachments:

1. Aerial Photograph 2. Community Plan Land Use Map 3. Project Location Map 4. Project Data Sheet 5. Drlli-'1 Permit Resolution with Findings 6. Dra.I--9: Permit -with Conditions 7. EnviJ---:onrnenta[ Exemption 8. Photosimulations 9. Project Plans

mon Tse , :o.i._ect Manager )

Devclb'flm~_:~~FJepartment

10. Community Planning Group agenda/ Applicat1.t's response 11. Project Chronology 12. Ownership Disclosure Statement 13. Site Justification 14. Site Photos 15. Draft Findings 16. Notice of Plann-ing Commission

- 4-

Page 5: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

* Aerial Photo Verizon Wireless Saturn Blvd - Project No. 348557 595 Saturn Blvd, San Diego, CA 92154

North

w ~ > (")

~

Page 6: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 7: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

*

OtayMesa­Nestor

Existing Conditions Land Use

Legend D Sl'!llo~-~ .. c::J L~_,-

Qwp GloJ.wloro - ---l g c-u.~ I L.....J - .\---­~-..-c-. o~~-.... --

OIWT,_

....-

..... ();left SIA'>CO

~

Community Land Use Map (OtayMesaNestor) North w Verizon Wireless Saturn Blvd - Project No. 348557 595 Saturn Blvd, San Diego, CA 92154

~ :> ()

~ ...., N

Page 8: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 9: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Rovrt:!.1ry t.,vt"

lfC't ~

"' I f.'·Tlily$:

!11 O:athv St

1.)0

r.1rv~ St

'r;,

C\i)!~SS Sl

r--.·s St

§ r , ~

~

0 ~ Cl>

!:2

6 , .. , ·-l,!!..•

151

·~ Walking Path

Boundaly Ave

• · II&R Bloc;k

• lwHOI'W o.pol

I Mol

.. Y'/llmln

Coniftr Ave Conifef Ave

Sink of AmtriQ

(ij • II ' ... c.roW. (i, !i

,-. l ~l

if' -l

$ouU\Iend • f'iazl

Dr v .. t~. m t L~1 c.J~o •

1814 @

' ".U

Yooe 11:

'"'

w~. s Fr.oo Banll

Cott)l'a l1 T ICC Shop

(~

•lvr "'do (' ,1 . • ,

-" , ,. ,~v,,..o

• p, • s

..

D<Jnha fwe

'ii Q

f;.~l.';;r!:..:;b IJIQt

""·"'~~du,Jw -~~ •...

-Project Location Map Verizon Wireless Saturn Blvd- Project No. 348557 595 Saturn Blvd, San Diego, CA 92154

~;t)nt't1 ,1.._-.,'t•

Lol• AV!' 220C

I~M-'

£

e ~

( '

~

t

!'2

l001t II Papa John a M PttJa

@ DISCOUnt l lr~ t:lfl!l Stort H """""

San 0K9C). CA Annando·a ~ M(!xw:.n food

~ 1.

~ I >. Pec:tfic Point , ~ ~

n

North I ~ z ....; \....)

Page 10: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 11: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT4 . PROJECT DATA SHEET

PROJECT NAME: Verizon Wireless Saturn Blvd

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VVirdess Com!llu::lication Facility (WCF) consisting of sixtee:1 (16) ar.tennas and sixtee:c. (16) Rerr_ote Radio Units (RRUs) concealed behind the rooftop parapet. The project also includes a 253~square equipment enclosure and a 144-square foot generator enclosure.

COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Otay Mesa Nest or

DISCRETIONARY Plrumed Development Permit and a Coastal Development Permit

ACTIONS:

COMMUNITY PLAN LAND Commercial

USE DESIGNATION:

(CC-2-3) ZONING INFORMATION:

CURREKT HEIGHT LL\HT: 30-feet I'ROl'OSED HE.JGHT LIMIT: No change

CVRRE:_';IT _(1R0I\T S!'::THACK: 1 0-feet PROPOSED FRONT SETBACI(: No change

ClJl:UtiCNT SiDE SETBACK: 1 C--fcct PROPOSED SIDE SETBACK: ~o change i

CllRREKT REAR SETBACK: 10-feet P.ROPOSED REAR SETBACK: )!J ~hnnge '

i I ---·-·- -

ADJACENTl LAl'lD USE DESIGNATION EXISTING LANO USE I I

PROPERTIES: I &ZONE I

' NORTH: Commercial/CC-2-3 Commercial

SOUTH: Commercial/CC~2-3 Commercial/Palm A venue

EAST: Commercial/CC-2-3 Commercial/Interstate Highway 5

WEST: Commercial/CC-2-3 Commercial

DEVIATIONS OR VARIANCES Deviation to exceed the 250-sguare foot equipment limitation pursuant to

REQUESTED: Land Development Code Section 141.0420(g)(3). LDC Sections 141.0420(g)(3) to process WCFs Vvith an Neighborhood Development Pennit (NDP) has yet to be certified by the Coastal Commission and therefore, cannot be applied to projects located within the Coastal Overlay Zone.

COMMUNITY PLANNING GROUP On March 12, 2014, the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Planning Group

RECOMMENDATION: voted 6-3 to support the proposed WCF. (Attachment 11).

Page 12: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 13: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

PLANNING COM.'VIISSION RESOLUTION NO.

ATTACH-MENT 5

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1281819 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1281818

VERIZON WIRELESS SATURN BLVD PROJECT NO. 348557

WHEREAS, SPP CORP; [)AVIS JACK W LLC; KRASNOFF ALBERT W LLC, Owner and VERIZON WIRELESS, Permittee, filed an application with the City of San Diego for a new Wireless Communication Facility that consist of sixteen (16) antennas and sixteen (16) Remote Radio Units (RRUs) concealed behind the rooftop parapet of a commercial building using Fiberglass Reinforced Panel (FRP) materials, painted and textured to match the building surface. The equipment associated with this project is located inside a 253-square foot concrete block enclosure with tile roof and painted to match the existing building. An emergency generator v-.111 also be installed inside a separate 144-square foot equipment enclosure with a trellis roof and painted to match the existing building (as described in and by reference to the approved Exhibits nA" and corresponding conditions of approval for the associated Plmmed Development Permit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818);

WHEREAS, the project site is located at 595 Saturn Blvd in the CC-2-3 zone of the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan;

WHEREAS, the project site is legally described as Lot 10 of Palm Avenue shopping center, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 10357, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March 9, 1982;

WHEREAs-,-ori May 22, 2014, the Plalliiing COlliffiiSsTOilOfllie-Cit)IOTS!li:iUi-Cgo COllSIOerea Pfanned Development Pem1it No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818 pursuant to the Land Development Code of the City of San Diego;

WHEREAS, on April 7, 2014, the City of San Diego, as Lead Agency, through the Development Services Department, made and issued an Environmental Determination that the project is exempt from the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) under CEQA Guideline Section 15303 (Ne\V Construction) and there was no appeal of the Environmental Determination filed within the time period provided by San Diego Municipal Code Section 112.0520;

BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Diego as follows:

That the Planning Commission adopts the following \witten Findings, dated May 22, 2014.

FINDINGS:

Planned Development Permit- Section 126.0604

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plan;

The proposed Verizon project is located within the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Planning area which does not specifically address WCFs. Hovvever, the City of San Diego's General Plan

Pagel of4

Page 14: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMEKT 5

requires all WCFs to minimize· visual impacts by concealing the wireless facilities in existing structures or by using screening techniques to hide or blend them into the surrounding area. The plan also requires these facilities to be designed to be aesthetically pleasing and respectful of the neighborhood context Furthermore, the plan states that equipment associated 1vith wireless facilities be concealed from public view.

The antennas and the RRUs are completely concealed behind the rooftop parapet using replacement Fiberglass Reinforced Panel (FRP) materials. The replacement FRP material ""ill be painted and textured to match the existing parapet and would allow the antennas to operate without any interference. More importantly, the design would allow for a completely stealth solution. The equipment associated with this project is located inside a 253-square foot equipment enclosure designed to replicate the painting palette and the rooftop tile from the commercial plaza. A separate enclosure with a trellis roofl¥1.11 also be installed to conceal an emergency

---back=up-generator:-'Fhis ·strueture-wi-1-l-alsiJ··be paintecl--tD-mateh-the-exist-ing eommere-ial-bui-ldi-ng. As designed, the proposed WCf complies with the requirements of the City's General Plan. The proposed \VCf does not adversely affect the applicable land usc plan.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare;

The project consists of sixteen (16) antennas, sixteen (16) RRUs and a microwave dish concealed behind the rooftop parapet wall with replacement FRP materials. The equipment associated ffith this project is located inside a 253-square foot enclosure with tile roof, painted to match the commercial building. A separate 144-square foot enclosure vvith a trellis roof will also be installed to conceal an emergency back-up generator.

1be-project was-determined tooe-exeritfii from tlie -california Environmental Quality Act {CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction). The Conditions of approval for the project will require compliance IVith several operational constraints and development controls intended to assure the continued public health, safety and welfare. All proposed improvement plans associated with the project will be reviewed prior to issuance of construction permits and inspected during construction to assure t.1.e project will meet or exceed all relevant and applicable building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and fire codes.

Additionally, the Telecommunication Act of 1996 preempts local governments from regulating the ''placement, construction and modification of wireless communication facilities on the basis of the envirofl..mental effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emission to the extent that such facilities comply with the Federal Communication Commission's (fCC) standards for such emissions," Verizon Wireless submitted an RF Report, which concluded that the project complies with the FCCs RF Standards. Therefore, the project would not result in any significant health or safety risks to the surrounding area within matters of the City's jmisdiction. ln conclusion, the proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, a11d welfare.

3. The proposed development '"'ill comply with the regulations of the Land Development Code including any proposed deviations pursuant to Section 126.0602(b)(l) that are appropriate for this location and will result in a mOre desirable project than would be achieved if designed in strict conformance with the development regulations of the applicable zone, and any allowable deviations that are othenvise authorized pursuant to the Land Development Code.

Page 2 of4

Page 15: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 5

VlCFs are pcnnitted in a commercial zone as a Limit Use pursuant to LDC Section 141.0420(c); however, the combination of the two equipment enclosure exceeding 250-square feet would require a deviation pursuant to LDC Section 141.0420(g)(3). LDC Sections 141.0420(g)(3) to process \VCFs with an Neighborhood Development Pennit (NDP) has yet to be certified by the Coastal Commission and therefore, cannot be applied to projects located within the Coastal Overlay Zone. Instead, a Planned Development Permit (PDP) would be required for the equipment deviation to exceed 250-square feet. The project is located within the Coastal Overlay Zone within an appealable area and so a Coastal Development Permit \\'ill be processed, as a consolidated Process 4 decision.

The project as a whole complies with LDC Section 141.0420(g)(l) and 141.0420(g)(2) which requires all \VCFs to utilize the smallest, least visually intrusive antennas, components and other necessary equipment and to use all reasonable means to conceal or minimize the visual impacts of the wireless communication facilities through integration. Integration vv:ith existing structures or among other existing uses shall be accomplished through the use of architecture, landscape and siting solutions. Consistent \Vith the regulations, the antennas, RRUs, and the microwave dish \Vill

all be completely concealed behind the rooftop parapet.

The proposed WCF includes a deviation to exceed the 250-square feet equipment limitation pursuant to LDC 141.0420(g)(3). ). LDC Sections 141.0420(g)(3) to process WCFs with an Neighborhood Development Permit (NDP) has yet to be certified by the Coastal Commission and therefore, cannot be applied to projects located within the Coastal Overlay Zone. The proposed deviation for two equipment enclosures combined to exceed 250-square feet can be supported by staff since each enclosure design and location addresses the reqnirement for integration. The 253-square fOot equipment-enclosure has been -cte·signetl·to in:cludetile-rnof·antl-\Vill'bt:q:m·inted ro· · match the existing commercial building. lt is located behind existing mature landscaping and away from any major public views. In fact, this facility may only be visible from commuters on southbound Interstate Highway-S and would appear as part of the commercial plaza design.

The proposed emergency generator is ·located inside a separate 144-square foot equipment enclosure with a rooftop trellis. To ensure proper ventilation, this model generator requires an open roof which will be enclosed for security purposes with a chain link fence above, not visible from the ground level. Similar to the equipment enclosure location, this generator facility is also screened behind existing mature landscaping. The purpose and intent of the emergency generator is to provide back-up power in the event of a power outage. In the past, the carrier's would allocate maintenance crews to connect portable generators in the event of an outage but it is always a preference of the carrier to maintain an actual generator on site. For this site, Verizon was able to \Vork in a design that integrates and conceals the generator to comply with the WCF design regulations.

Coastal Development Permit- Section 126.0708

1. The proposed coastal development will not encroach upon any existing physical acccssway that is legally used by the public or any proposed public accessway identified in a Local Coastal Program land usc plan; and the proposed coastal development will enhance and protect public views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas as specified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan.

Page3 of4

Page 16: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 5

All development would occur on private property and the subject property is not located within or near any designated public views conidor. The proposed antennas associated with this WCF Vvill be completely stealth behind the replacement FRP rooftop parapet. The equipment enclosures are located on the southeast elevation between the commercial building and existing landscaping. The proposed WCF as designed vvill not impact any views to or along the ocean or other scenic coastal area specified in the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan.

2. The proposed coastal development will not adversely affect environmentally sensitive lands.

The proposed project is located on an existing developed commercial property designated for commercial usc within the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Planning area. The project site is not located on or adjacent to any environmentally sensitive lands and thus will not cause any impacts.

3. The proposed coastal development is in conformity with the certified Local Coastal Program land use plan and complies with aU regulations of the certified Implementation Program.

The proposed WCF conforms to the Otay Mesa Nestor Cmmnullity Plan and the Certified Local Coastal Program which designates the site for cominercial use and is consistent with the design guidelines, and development standards in effect for this site per the Coastal Overlay Zone (Appealable Area) zone.

4. For every Coastal Development Permit issued for any coastal development between the nearest public road and the sea or the shoreline of any body ohvater located within the CoastaTOVerlayZoiic llie- coastal deViiOpment1Sin cOiiformity 'Yifllffle j}iililiC. access ali_d_ public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.

The proposed WCF is not vvithin the area between the first public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water within the Coastal Overlay Zone. The proposed WCF will not impact public access or the public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore adopted by the Plamling Commission, P!mmcd Development Pe1mit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818. is hereby GRANTED by the Plmming Commission to the referenced Owner/Permittee, in the form, exhibits, tenns and conditions as set forth in Planned Development Permit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

Simon Tse Development Project Manager Development Services

Adopted on: May 22,2014

Internal Order No. 24004418

Page 4 of 4

Page 17: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

RECORDING REQUESTED BY CliY OF SAN DIEGO

DEV~LOPMENT SeRVICES PERMIT INTAKE, MAIL STATION 501

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

PRO~ECT MANAGEMENT PERMIT CLERK

MAlL STATION 501

ATTACE.MENT 6

SPACE ABOVE THIS L!NE FOR RECORDER'S USE INTERNAL ORDER NUMBER: 24004418

PLA1'1NED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1281819 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 1281818

VERIZON WIRELESS SATURN BLVD PROJECT NO. 348557 PLANNING COMMISSION

This Planaed Development Pelmit No. 1281819 and Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818 is granted by the Planning Com1nission of the City of San Diego to SPP Corp; Davis Jack W LLC; Krasnotl Albert W LLC, Owner, a.'l.d Verizon "\Vireless, Permittee, pursua.11t to Sa:~ Diego Mmicipal Code [SDMC] sections 126.0601, 126.0701, 131.0501 :md 141.0420. The site is located at 595 Saturn Bl"vd in the CC-2a3 zone oft.'Ie Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan. The project site is legally described as Lot 10 of Palm Avenue shopping center, in the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof no. 10357, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego Cmmty, March 9, 1982.

Subject to the tenns and conditions set forth in this Permit, permission is granted to Owner m1d Permittee ~o install a new Wireless Communication Facility (VICF) described and identified by size, dimension, quantity, type, and location on the approved exhibits [Exhibit ''A''] dated May 22,2014, on file in the Development Services Department.

The project shall include:

a. A WCF that consist of sixteen (16) antennas, sixteen Remote Radio Uhits (RRUs) and a 48-inch diameter microwave dish concealed behind the rooftop parapet using Fiberglass Reinforced Panel (FRP) materials, painted and textured to match the existing commercial building; and

b. The equipment associated vvith this project is located inside a 253-square foot concrete block enclosure on a concrete pad with a tile roo±: painted to match t!:te existing commercial building; and

Page 1 of7

Page 18: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 6

c. An emergency generato: inside a 144~square foot enclosure v.-ith a rooftop treJJis, painted to r:wtch the ex.isting commercial buildi.qg; and

d. Public and private accessory improvements determined by the Development Services Department to be consistent wi:h the land use rn:d development standards for this site in accordance vvith the adopted community plan, t_1_e California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] and the CEQA Guidelines, the City Engineer's requirements, zoning regulations, conditions of this Pennit, and any other applicable regulations of the SDMC.

STANDARD REQUIREMENTS:

~ 1. This permit must be utilized -vvithinth-irty-six (36) months after the date on which all. rights of appeal have expired. If this permit is not utilized in accorda.~ce with Chapter 12, Article 6, Division 1 of the SDMC within the 36 month period, this permit shall be void unless an Extension of Time has been granted. Any such Extension of Time must meet all SDMC requirements and applicable guidelines in effect at the time the extension is considered by the appropriate decision maker. This permit must be utilized by June 6, 2017.

2. Ibis Coastal Developmen! Pe1mit shall become effective on -:he eleventl: working day fiJllowing receipt by the California Coas1cl Commission of the Notice of Final Action, or foilmving all appeals.

3. This Planned Developm.e.:nt Permit (PDP) and Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and corresponding use of this site shall expire on May 22, 2024. Upon expiration of this Permit, the facilities and improvements described herein shall be removed from this site and the property shall be restored to its original condition preceding approval of this Pennit.

4. No later than ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of this pennit, t_1_e Ow11er/Permittee may submit a new application to the City Manager for consideration 'With review and a decision by the appropriate decision maker at that time. Failure to submit prior to the deadline will be cause for enforcement for noncompliance, which may incluc!e penalties and fines.

5. Under no circumstances, does approval of this permit authorize the Owner/Permittee to utilize this site for wireless communication purposes beyond the permit expiration date. Usc of this permit beyond the expiration date of this permit is prohibited.

6. The: Owner/Permittee shall notify the City within 30 days of the sale or transfer of this site to any other provider or if the site is no longer operational requiring the removal and the restoration of this site to its original condition.

7. No permit for the construction, occupancy, or operation of any facility or improvement described herein shall be granted, nor shall any activity authorized by this Permit be conducted on the premises until:

Page 2 of7

Page 19: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHME)IT 6

a. The Owner/Permittee signs and returns the Pennit to the Development Services Department; and

b. The Pennit is recorded in the Office of the San Diego Cou:1ty Recorder.

8. \Vhile this Permit is in effect, the subject property shaH be used only for the pur;JOses and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Permit tmless otherwise authorized by the appropriate City decision maker.

9. This Pennit is a covenant running -with the subject propetiy and all of the requirements and conditions of this Permit and related documents shall be binding upon the Owner/Permittee and any successor(s) in interest.

10. The continaed use of this Permit shall be subject to the regulations of this and any other applicable governmental agency.

11. Issua:1ce of this Permit by the City of Scm Diego does not authorize t.~Je Owner/Permittee for this Permit to violate any Federal, State or City laws, ordinances, regulations or policies including, but not limited to, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 [ESA] and any amendments thereto (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.).

12. The Owner/Perm:ttec shall secure all necessary building permits. The Owner/Permittee is informed that to secure these permits, s1:bstantial building modificatior.s and site improvements may be ~equired to com.pl.y with appl.tcable bmlding, tire, mechanical, and plun:bing codes, md State and Federal clisabiiir; access lavvs.

13. Construction plans shall be in substantial conformity to Exhibit "A." Changes, modifications, or alterations to the construction plans are prohibited unless appropriate application(s) or amendment(s) to this Permit have been granted.

14. AJ! of the conditions con1ained in this Permit have been considered and were determined­necessary to make the findings required for approval of this Permit. The Permit holder is required to comply with each and every condition in order to maintain the entitlements that are granted by this Pennit.

If any condhion of this Permit, on a legal challenge by the Owner/Permittee of this Permit, is found or held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, unenforceable, or nmeasonable, this Permit shall be void. However, in such an event, the Owner/Permittee shall have the right, by paying applicable processing fees, to bring a request for a new permit without the "invalid" conditions(s) back to the discretionary body which approved the Permit for a determination by that body as to whether all of the findings necessary for the issuance of the proposed permit can still be made in the absence of the "invalid" condition(s). Such hearing shall be a hearing de novo, and the discretionary body shall have the absolute right to approve, disapprove, or modify the proposed permit and the condition(s) contained therein.

Page 3 of7

Page 20: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACl-L'vlliNT 6

15. The Ovvner/Permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any and all claims, actions, proceedings, danmges, judgments, or costs, including attorney's fees, against the City or its agents, officers, or employees, relating to the issuance of this permit including, but :1ot lL"llited to, any action to attack, set aside, void, challenge, or annul this development approval and any environmental document or decision. The City will promptly notify Ovv11er/Permirtee of any claim, action, or proceeding and, if the City should fail to cooperate fully in the defense, the Owner/Permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmiess the City or its agents, officers, and employees. The City may elect to conduct its own defense, participate in its own defense, or obtain independent legal counsel. in defense of any claim related to this indemnification. In the event of such election, Owner/Permittee shall pay all of the costs related thereto, including \Vithout limitation reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In the event of a disagreement between the City and Ov\lller/Permittee regarding litigation issues, the City shall have the authority to contol the litigation and make litigation related decisions, including, but not limited to, sett!ement or otl:er disposition oft_"!Je matter. However, t::Ie Owner/Permittee shall not be required to pay or pcrfom1 any settlement ur:less such settlement is approved by Owner/Permittee.

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS:

16. The project proposes to cxpwt 19 cubic yards o.f material from the project site. All excavated material listed to be exported, shall be expor~ed tc a legal disposal site in accorda.'1ce with the Standard Specifications for Public 'Works Construction (the "Green Book"), 2003 edition and Regional Supplem~m Amendments adopted by Regional Standards Committee.

17. Prior to d1e issuance of any construction permit, tl1e Permitte0 shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement for the ongoing permanent BMP maintenance, satisfactory to the City Engineer.

18. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit, the Permittee shall incorporate any construction Best Management Practices necessary to comply with Chapter 14, Article 2, Division 1 (GradL'1g Regulations) of the San Diego Municipal Code, into the construction plans or specifications.

19. Prior to the issuance of any construction permit the Permittee shaH submit a Water Pollution Control Plan ('iVPCP). The \VPCP shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines in Appendix E of the City's Storm Water Standards.

PLANNING/DESIGN REQUIREMENTS:

20. The approved antenna dimensions are listed below and illustrated on the Exhibit "A" dated May 22, 2014. Replacement of the antennas may occur in the future, subject to the 0\\-ner/Pennittee notifying the Development Services Department prior to the replacement of the anten.'1as and subject to the provision of providing an updated Radio Frequency (RF) report demonstrating compliance with the Federal Commtmication Commission's regulations in accordance with SDMC Section 141.0420(b)(l)(A) to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

Page 4 of7

Page 21: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

a. 78,. by 15: by gs· b. 48-irch diameter micro\vave dish

21. The WCF shall conform to ihe stamped approved plans and approved photosi."'Tiulstions prior to final Telecom Planning 1nspection approvaL

22. Colored Photosimulations for tile WCF shall be printed (not stapled) on the construction plans. This helps ensure that the constmction team building the project constructs the project in compliance with approved the Exhibit "A."

23. The Owner/Permittee shall place appropriate signage_ on the WCF as requixed by CAL­OSHA/FCC to the satisfaction_ of the Development Services Department. The Owner/Permittee shall be responsiblc for complying vvit.'I all State and Federal regulations, as applicable.

24. Antennas shall not exceed ~he height of any existing or replacement FRP parapet screen.

25. Use of or replacemem of eny parap~t screen with FRP material for purposes of concealing ante1121as shall not result in any noticea.ble l-ines or edges in the transition to the original building. All fRP shall be painted and ~extured to mate;-., the origtn~l building surfaces.

26. The proposed cable tray shall be painted and textured to ma~cl;_ the existing cmnmercial building.

27. Al1 equipment, including 1rC11ls10rmer:o;, emergew,;y gt:m:ralors um1 air condilioner:s belonging to the Permittee shall be designed &'ld operated consistent with the City noise ordinance. Ventilation openings shall be baffled and directed away from residential areas. Vibration resonance of operating equipment in the equipment enclosures shall be eliminated.

28. All facilities and related equipment shall be maintained in good working order and free from trash, debris, graffiti and designed to discourage vandalism. Any damaged eguipmen~ shall be repaired or replaced within thirty (30) calendar days of notification by the City of Sa.'l Diego.

29. The Owner/Permittee shall notify the City within 30 days of the sale or transfer of this site to any other pro-vider or if the site is no longer operational requiring the removal and the restoration of this site to its original condition.

30. A topographical survey conforrnL'lg to the provisions of the SDMC may be required if it is determined, during construction, that there may be a conflict between the bu-ilding(s) under construction a.'ld a condition of this Permit or a :.-eglliation of the underlying zone. The cost of any such survey shall be borne by the Owner/Permittee.

31. The Permittee shall place appropriate signage on the \VCF as required by CAL~OSHA to the satisfaction of the Development Services Department.

32. All private outdoor lighting shall be shaded and adjusted to fall on the same premises where such 1ig,.1ts are located and in accordance with the applicable regulations ir: the SDMC.

Page 5 of7

Page 22: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 6

INFORMATION ONLY:

• Please note that a Telecom Planning Inspectio11. Issue will be placed on the project prier to Final Clearan_ce fron: the City's Building Inspector to ensure compliance with the approved plans and associated conditions. Prior to calling for vour Final Inspection from your building i..r1spection official, please contact the Project Manager listed below at (619) 687-5984 to schedule an inspection of the completed facility. Please schedule this administrative inspection at least 1ive vvorking days ahead of the requested Finallnspection date.

" The issuance ofthis discretionary use permit alone does not allow the immediate commencement or continued operation of the proposed use on site. The operation allowed by this discr-etionary use permit may Only begin d" teC:Oimi1e-nte a.-fter all coiiditiOiiS-1isted on this perm~t are fuEy completed and aH required ministerial permits have been issued and received linal inspection.

• Any party on whom fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions have been imposed as conditions of approval of this Permit, may protest the imposition vvi:hin ninet'f days of the approval of this development permit by filing a written protest with the City Clerk pursuant to California Govermnent Code-sectior: 66020.

" This development may be subject ~o impact fees ~t the time of construction permit 1ssuance.

APPROVED by the Planning Commission ofthe City of San Diego on May 22,2014 and [Approved Resolution Number].

Page 6 of7

Page 23: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATT ACiMENT 6

Plmmed Development Permit No. 1281819 Coastal Development Permit No. 1281818

May 22,2014

AUTHENTICATED BY THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Simon Tse Development Project Manager

NOTE: Notary acknowledgment must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

The undei"signed 0\Yner/P<!!rmittee, by execution hereo±: agrees to each and every conditior" of this Permit a1'1d promises to perform. each and every obligation of Owner/Permittee hereunder.

NOTE: Notary acknowledgments must be attached per Civil Code section 1189 et seq.

SPP Corp; Davis Jack W LLC; Krasnoff Albert W LLC Owner(s)

By Mic~h_ae_lc-Jc-.cclvcc!c-cP~h-e-e --------

President

Verizon Wireless Permittee

Byc-=c------------------­NAME TITLE

Page 7 of7

Page 24: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 25: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMEI'iT 7

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (Check one or both) TO: X RECORDEPlCOUl\'TY CLERK

P.O. Sox l750, MS A-33 FRO).-f: CITY OF 5,\"-1 DIEGO

1600 PACIFIC H\W, R00\!260 SA..\JDIEGO,CA 92101-2422

____ ,OFfiCE OF PLA."'i"!['IG AND RESEARCH

1400 TENTH STREET, ROOM 121 SACRfluVIENTO, CA 95814

PROJECT NO.: 348557 PROJECT TITLE: VERIZON SATURN

PROJECT LOCATION-SPECIFIC: 595 Saturn Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92154

PROJECT LOCATION-CITY/COUNTY: San Diego/San Diego

DEVELOPMENT SER\1CES DEPARTMENT

1222 HRST AVENUE, MS 501 SJ',.c"\f DIEGO, CA 92101

DESCRlPTIO:'i OF NATURE .A.ND PURPOSE Of THE PROJECT: The project is PLA.NNED DEVELOPME~T PERMIT (PDP) AND A COASTAL

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (CDP) for a new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) consisting of 16 panel anrem1as, 16 Remote Radio Units, and 1 microwave dish to be concealed behind the rooftop parapet of an existing commercial building uslng ne\v, RF' transparent screens that would be detailed, painted, and textured to match the existing buildmg design. Associated equipment will be located inside a 253-square foot equipment enclosure. A proposed 30 K\V emergency generator will be located inside a separate 144-square foot equipment enclosure.

NA_\1E OF PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVING PROJECT: City of San Diego

NA:V!E OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYI>IG OUT PROJECT: Kmigan Diehl (Agent)

Plancom Inc.

EXEMPT STATUS: (CHECKOh""E)

( ) Mf\!ISTERIAL(SEC. 21080(0)(1); "i5268);

302 State ?lace Escondido, CA 92027 760-587-3003

( ) DECLARED EMERGENCY (SEC. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); ( ) EMERGENCY PROJECT (SEC. 21080(b)( 4); 15269 (b)(c)) (X) CATEGORIC.A..L EXEYIPTIO}<-: 15303 (NEW COl\STRUCnON ORCO""'VERSTO""' OF S'VIALL STRUCTURES)

( ) STATUTORYEXEI\-IPTlONS:

REASO::\S WHY PROJECT IS EXEMPT: The City of San Diego conducted a..r1 environmental review which determined that this proJect, the installation of a WCF coMisting of 16 panel antetmas, 16 Remote Radio Units, 1 microw-ave dish to be concealed behind the rooftop parapet of an existing commercial building and 1:\vo separate enclosures, orre for associated equipment and one for a 30 K\V emergency generator meets the criteria set forth in CEQA Section 15303, which allows for the construction and location oflimited numbers of nevv small facilities or structures, respectively. Additionally, none of the exceptions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.

LEAD AGENCY CO~TACT PERSON: AnnaL. McPherson AJCP TELEPHONE: (619) 446-527fi

TF FILED BY APPLICANt:

1. ATIACH CERTIFIED DOCUMENT OF EXEMPTION FNDWG.

2. HAS A l'.OT!CE OF EXEMPTION BEEN FILED BY THE PUBLIC AGE:-..:CY APPROVJJ\!GTHE PROJECT?

( ) YES ( ) No IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO HAS DETERl'vf!NED THE ABOVE ACTIVITY TO BE EXEMPT FRO:\! CEQA

UM£-. );(~~~ /sotror Plaw1w SJGt\ATURE/TITLE CHECK ONE:

APRIL4,20!4

DATE

(X) SIGNED BY LEADAGEl'<CY ( ) SIGNED BY t-\PPLJC.A.J.~1

DATE RECEI\/ED FOR fiLING WITH COU;.!TY CLERK OR OPR:

Revised() 1041 Omjh

Page 26: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 27: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

~L. .. :·-.~';:; ~-·--· ... ... . ....._~~ ........ -·-oa-,...___.

. ~

These slmuletlons are Intended for t.o be pilrt of or to replace the Information provided on the construGtlon drawings

2/21/ 2014

jo

Proposed able tray·------.

Proposed equipment shelter rlnlshed to match existing building---"""""

D

Saturn Blvd 595 Saturn Blvd San Diego, CA 92154

v-­~

Page 28: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

1/ 14/ 2014

Saturn Blvd 595 Saturn Blvd San Diego, CA 92154

~r-------- Proposed antennas mounted

~ WH1ZJZll

behind new RF transparent saeens

Page 29: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

. / J:;f]J Jr

These simulations lire Intended ror graphical purposes only and not to be part ot or to replace the lnformaUon provided on the

1/14/2014

Saturn Blvd 595 Saturn Blvd San Diego, CA 92154

PhotOsimu/ation of proposed'fe"lecommunlcatiiiris'Site

Page 30: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 31: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

VICINITY MAP

'"'~ •

THOMAS GUIDE PAGE: 1330 - A6

ADDRESS 505 SATURN SLVO.

SA>l DIEGO. c• "'""~

DIRECTIONS: (fi«J~ VZ'ii'S <lfflCES IK I"'IM[), mow IS51l0 SAND ~1\NYOII AVE~U·. IRVlNE1, CA 9261 S. DEPART SAND <:.Ufr'OO A>li: 101\'A!!D """""""- PK'II'I, T•t<E R..,P RIGHT fOR l-'-ll5 SOUTH TilWARD SA!< pj[GO, Km' STIWGI!T OHI'O I-~ S, Ki:EP WT ONTO 1-•0~ S, AT EIOT U, TAKE RA~P RH>Iff FOil <A-10

' SOUTH TOW""" U i. lONG JR FYI\', B<.lll RIGHT OHTll 1-S S, AT rni SA, TAI<C ... ., fflOO'T AND fOllOW SOO•S fOR CA-70, ARRIVE AT MS SAT\IR~ Sl\'0, S~ 01£00, tA 9215< ON THE !l!OHT.

j I i

I '--------·------'

SCALE THE ORAW!"G SCALES ~OWH IN TI!IS $1:1" REI'R£$00 'HE t0RREC1" SCAU: ~LY WHEN ll!ESE ORl\'I:NGS A!!E PRlHffi ltl A 2<" , !6" FOPJJAT. I< THIS DRAWINO S<T IS NOT ~~· < 06", lHIS SIC[ IS NOT TO SC"IL loll. OR.li'IIWGs ARO SCI<WAHC. PO NOT >CAL£ DMWINGS TQ o=RWLNE OR VEIUFY ANY OIMEN30N •• DliAWIMUS OF A"Y SOZE SHAll NEVER 9C '"""'-"0 FOR 'N>ll<tNO DTHEil THA" G>Hrn.<L RU'ER[NCO.

!

' -\ .... .

verlzC!rt wireless SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92154

CONSULTANT TEAM ARCHITECT: BOGTii .l SU .. ~OC AAOHIT,CTIIRE "'"­!20 CA!l""SAIJ VIIUGE DRIVE, SUITE 02 CAALSSAD, CA !20!la (7•c) .,,_.,,.. (7ac) ~•-mo (l'AA)

SURVEYOR: JR" CML tMGilll:i:ll$ 2~2 AVOliD.\ FIIIIRICI>NTE, SUITE 107 """' cLO.oom:, CA 02~12 (941!) 24!1-40SS

LEASING/PW\NNII'IG:

fL.ANCO~I. IHC. JOD\' Blfmlll~ &12 STAT£ f'IACf: I;SCOHDIOC, CA •:102.0

{a"al "'"""""'""

PROJECT DATA EXISTING OCCUPANCY:

P!lOPOSED OCCUPANCY:

EXISTING TYPS Of" CONSTRUCTION:

PROPOSED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: PROJECT AREAS: ffiOfOSED EOUIP. ROOM AAEAo """""'"'" GENf""TOR <NCLO.URE,

N (flR< Sf'i.N><I.OR<D)

PERMITS REQUIRED 8POP- PR<>CESS 4

PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICANT:

OWNER:

VEI!IZO!l WII<EL<:SS IS~OS SAt!O C»JYOO AVEHUE IR\IIHE, CA 92Sie

CONTACY; JOOY B1TTERU~ PHON£. (aSs) 34,__Sc~~

SPF' CO.P: DAVIS JACK 'II I.LC: """"HOff AIJlffir W LLC , • ., 1ITAT< lm"ET SAN Dl£00, CA ~210:

SITE COOTACT: ~~~[ WCPHt:E 3250 ST~ A"EI4"E flOC S>.!l DIEM, Col 0410! PHON£. (<:9) G!2-!1~2

I !'ROJECT DESCRIPTION: • INSTAUATIC'•; <.1' ~ 'IIIW..Ell!l TElZC<lM~UNIOATOONS

EQUI?IjEHT R•t><5 INSIDE A MEW CONCRETE MCK EOUIPME~'T I!IJi\.OUlG 0~ I. CONCRETE PAO

• lt!STAIU.TI<IH ~r FOUR (<) 'IE!IlZllM 'Mimi£$!; AIH""E>IIV. smnrns. oF roo• (O) ....,.,""" '"'-"" (TOTAl. or .OIIT<E" ~;'k~"r':l;.fi~flt:TEO QN ROOF ~HIN!I M ... RF

81NSTAUATION ~r F"OUR (4) ~; ~ RRU UNITS PER SECTIJ• (TOTAE. OF SIIIT~ (10) ••U"S) WOU,...O OM C""'-" r .. Y 01< ROOF""'

IOINSTM.I.IITIC>/1 <·f ONE (\) I'E!IIZOO llllllEIEl$ ··~·· WICROWAVE OISH ANTONH. (fOR TElCO SER"LCE fEW) W<IUNTEO ON "''" llrnLNO NEW !!(' TRA""PA""I<T SC/IEEM

., IHSTAU...ITIQM or O~E (!) 'iE!IzON WI~ RAYCAP SURGE PROTEC"ro!< P€11 AO<!EHNA SEcTOR ~0 "tWO (2) INSIDE PROFOS'O EOUII'IJOilf <>lCLOSURC (TOTAl Of Sl" (0) RA\'CAP SURGE I'I>OIECI~S)

O>ll<STil.l.l.<TION ·1F (0) r<m \til-~ E/011 o•s ANTENI«S

~ INSIAI..i.J.TI<>t< "' ~ !OI<W E•cwsto EWEIIGENC"I" G""-"""'TOR WITH A 210 GUJ..QII OIESEl. TAWK ON A CON~ECE PAO INSIO!: A CONC.R!:!l: ~ WIJJ.. ENC:.OSURE.

l!)lotsl"A!UTIQN '."<'A MC\!' EliC:miClL SEilV!CE fll<lM OH Ql5TING EUC ~!CAl. S\I'ITQlGEAR

"'lt<Sl"AU.ATION ~fA""" TEI.CO SE:RVIC[ COO~ECTION ._OM AN EXISTING TElOO BO.RD

l'flOJECT ADDRESS: ••• s•ru•• BlV"­"""DIEGO. Cl 9215-<

ASSESSORS !'ARCEL NUMBER: 021-101-za

EXISTING ZQinNG: cx:-H!

i NOl"E: TH<•c A"' NO '""<TIN<! TEl.ECO>;>WNIC.OTION FACIUTICS ON TI<IS P"OPERTY: """'"' ~NO AT-"T

SHEET SCHEDULE T-1 WU: !HEEl AND I""OJ[C"[ llMA

A-0 .l.llEII Fu.o<

A-·1 Sir< e...., /,-2 G;N£RAIOR o:llCUISURE PW

A-3 ENLJ.f!G&I !lUI\ PI.M i1< EMi.Aii<li:O Um.ITY ROO~ PIAl'

A-4 ROOF ;>u.N

A-5 AIIT<HNA ,.,_.,..

A-6 ~ln£"!10" El.£\IATIOI<S

C-1 IOPOG!li<.0Hic SUFIVEY

LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARca A-1: 1.01 10 OF PAUol A~UE SHOPPING W4TEF. IN THE CllY Of So.N 01!:00. OO!~lY OF SAN 01EGO. STAtE OF" CJ,JJf'OANIA. ACOOROI~G TO ~AP THEREOF NO. 103S7. FlED IN THE OFFlCE: OF THE COU'm' R~<:J!OtR 0" SAN OIEOO COUNT"L". 1,/ARCH 9. 19e<.

F'OR AOOIY~H•L l.EOAL D[SOII<PII<>I< IM'OO.~~TION Srt SHEn t-1

APPliCABLE CODES ld.L l'roRK SI\OLl COI.lPLY Willi Till! F"OI!.OWII<G APPilCABI.E ~DE:S•

CAUfORNtA SIA!Ii: aUILOIHG COPE. 1111.! :!-<, 2010 EOITIO~

CAUfORNLA fWNBING CliO[, 2010 mmoN c•UFORNI~ ~ECHAiliC•L COO£, 2010 rnrnoo CAUI'ORNIA W:C1"RIC~l COOE. 2010 O:Dmrm C.IIUFORNIA ""' CODE:. 0010 EDOTIOH CAUFORNIA OlOOGr COOO. ZOIC EOITIOM

IN ll<E EVENT Of CONFUCT. THO WaST RESll!ICm'£ COO£ SHAU. ~EVAil

ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER I!IFS f~OJECT IS 1.11 UNOCCUfiEO WIRElESS FCS TI!I.E:COW~UN,COTIONS rACIIlTY '-'<0. O.CCOIMII<' TO WRI"ITEM INTERI'RETATIOii FROM THE CO.UFORNI> OCPAill!JOIIT Or THE STm: ""OI<ITECT. IS EW,O!'T FRO~ OISMli.E1l ACCESS R'OUIRE"'NTS.

ATTACHMENT 9

~RCHIT<CTUOE ;; IN~onror,~TED

'" <"'"" ""'·' "'"~ "1T<"' CR>LSORO. C< "000 (7<0) <l<•0<7<

==,== PREPARED FOR

~ ver•mnwireless

P.O. BOX 19707 IRVmE. CA 92623-9707

(949) 286-7000

1=-=,== APPROVALS

""Ai<-c ... " ... "' ~· ,.

~· ~E/IN ~·

'" OE/OUT

om

~· ... !'ROJECT NAME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BOULEVARD SAN OIEGO, CA 92l54

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

==··== 10/15/13 I0/17/1~ ID/23/1J 0'/13/14 02/21/14

DRAWIMG DATES

gQ% ID (") H)O~ ZO (I<)

1- ZO R~I'ISIO~ I 1"1 Hlill< ZO F.E:'IISIO~ 0 rd 100l< ZO REI'ISIOM 3 I<)

==··== SHEET TITLE

TillE SHEET

• PROJECT DATA

==,==

==,==

T-1

Page 32: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

I ' I ' I i ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I

AREA PLAN

11<~ OWN£RSHIP OF MD I.A'ID OOI!S NOT I~CL.!JOO RIGHTS OF ACCOS'S Til INlERS'i"ATE: 0 liS SAID R!QiTS WERE SEVERED fRO~ niE LH<D

ATTACHMENT 9

AnCHITECTU~E :: IMCD~PO~ATOP

"' c'"'"" VIL<'"' om~ sum" <"""'· c, "'''" ("ol .,,_,.,.

==,== PREPARED FOR

~ verlzonwireless

P.O. SOX 19707 IRVIHE, CA 92623-9707

(9.\9) 286-70ll0"

==··==

"' '"'

APPROVALS

DATE: .. -.---01\TE

-iii.,-,---

,.,---

PROJECT NAME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO, CA 92154

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

==··== 10/15/!3 10/17/1! 10/~>/1~ 01/1>/,. 02./21/14

DRAWING DATES

90% ~0 { .. ) \00~ ZD {lo) 100% ZO ~[VISION I 1"1 IOO~ ZO REVISION 2 nl 100~ Zll F£\'ISIOH :l I<)

==,== SHEET TITLE

AREA PLAN

==,== F'I!OJEClS\ I'ERIZO~ 13:,5$

==··==

A-0

Page 33: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

(;:~''" ··~''"

SITE PLAN "

N 01"0e"54" E

D!IST!NO tJJlLlY (EIE!l"RICA!.. -I< "TU.CQ P.O.C. OPnoo 1}

D

/

DElTA SECTOR AZI~UTH 10"

• [

N B8"5J"OG" W

0

N .,.,,·oo" ,.

MICfiUI'I"'-'E DISH ""~UTH T.s.o.

• EX1ST!NG tJJlLn' flOoOI.I (EI..EI:TlliCAl "' m.oo P.O.C. Of'TI<lN :1.)

52.24"

,, .... _ .. _"''""""'"""'--~ 595 S!TIJRN 80ULE\IM!l. S.'N OEGO. CA 9Z1>4 ~ - ....... -...">) __ ln __ ..,_"""" __ .... """""""'_"

...... w ... _..,_..,......,.~---"'-....-..o _ .... ._. .... .._..""""""""' ,_ ............ _ ...... __ .,. .. _ .... __ ·---~·---­··--·--..,, ... _ .. _ ...... ..,...,.. --....-----.......... ___ ... __ -----,., ___ _._ ...... _ .. __ -~-===----- ....... ____ ... _ ...,... .. __ _

-"--. "'""""'"'"""'-.......................................... _,.., __ ........ - .. ....... ""'""',...... ......... __ ,.,.., ...... _ ..... _

I!OlE: rOll All SITE OIO>Jr-<.0« PATTOON$ I< GDll.EGnON/DISCil'RGE l'OIN"lO. SEE a!EIT ·-1

DATA TABLE: PEllCENTJ<lE OF SITE PRE\10\lSlr ~~ --~ CUSIC Y/FIDS 01' CUT ___,[!~...._ CU8fC Y""DS OF Fll.C .........lll...

><JLI.J~E OF Flll. TO BE IIIJ'OOTEll ...1....IU:ll!. D<PORT<D ~

AAEA TO aE tli<AOEll? __L_ ~ Of" SITE --~-­

PROI'OSEO CUT SlOPE !lA.TIO: _____o__ FlU. a<JPE !lA.nO'--..ll.......

"""""UM HEJGIIT OF' CLIT SL<JPE _..........!l.. Ft:EI": AU. Sl.OI'E ----"--.. f'EEf

Etlt:lowm<: N<Jlcr;,

1. •o 80STlt.O PA!<<lNG SPAC£ Wlll. BE USED OR REMOVEII BY T><IS PR()JEOT.

2. THIS f'lmJEC;" PRc?OSEs P>:1 W01~ WITHIN THE PUSUC RIOH1"-0!'"--II'AY.

J. l'lliO• TO ISS~ OF N<Y CCt<ml\lGTlON PE!MT. THE PERMrrTU SH/>.11. ENTER IN!"O A M'JNn:NA!<CE AGREIJIIOO fOR !liE OI<GOI~G PEI'W.\HEtll &IP ~IJNrrw.NCE, SAnSfAC!Ofti TO lHE CI!Y ~G!NEER.

~- PRIOR TO 1$U»>~ OF ANY COfoZ[f!UGTlON PER"IT· THE PERMrrTU SHAll. INC<>i<l'Oillill: ANY CO!iSTRUOTION SEST I!AI{.ISO.IOO ""-'CTCCEs NECESS<!lY llJ CO"PLY WITH CHAF'lffi 1 4, A<llGl.E 2. DMOON 1 (~RI>IJING ~E~ULI\~ONS) Of lHE SA" OIEGC ~UMOIPA!. CODE. lmD lHE: CONSTRUC110N Pl.#IS OR SP!:CIFCA110NS

~. PRIOR ill ISSUANCO OF N<Y C<J'<STilOCliON PEllMIT lHE PERMIITEE SH'!.l.

~~,';;~ ~~~~~" ,g:.~~ ~':J:~~- ,;:EIIvg;~•E "~f' CITY'S ST1lR~ WATE!i STANDARDS

EASLIIIENTS SHOWN '\EFU:CT PilEUMIN"'l"r" RECORD" REsO>RCH o• REOORDEO PAACEJ.. ''AP>" -1: PRU.IMNIOO" TITLE REI'OI\1". EASEMENTS ME SU6JEOT TO RtviCY.' OF RNI\l mt.E REPom. 5Ef: SHEEr C-1 fDR AD)>lTONI\liNFCm<TION ON NON PLOTT""-£ EASE!.I<I'!TO

60\INIW?f Ncrm

TI!C PmPERTY OOU"o,oro" LINOS SKO'ol< ON THIS """-11\NG AAE FOR REFffi""oNCE ONLY. A SOUr<DARY .WR\'CY WAS NOT ~EWlRMEO

ATTACHMENT 9

,., """"' ""''"' ""~ <""""· « .. 00. '"'""

==,.== PREPARED FOR

~ venmnwireless

P.O. BOX 19707 IRVINE, CA 9Z623-9707

(949) 286~7000

==··==

"'

'"

APPROVALS

DATE

""

""

PROJECO t>!AME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO. CA 92154

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

== .. == 10/13/13 t~/17/ll 10/2.l/1l 01/13/U 02/21/1~

DRAWING DATES

OO:< ZO (") 100~ ZC (lo) 100~ ZD Rf:VISION 1 I"! 100~ ZD Rf:VISIOH Z •d 100% ZO Rf:VISIO~ 3 lo

== .. == SHEET TITLE

SITE PLAN

---"==

==,.==

A-1

Page 34: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

l 0

l

l

\

\ ~~

fl) / I I

,lJ! ~"'"

( I

0 I , I \ \ ~

GENERATOR ENCLOSURE PLAN

\ 0

GENERATOR ENCLOSURE PLAN NOTES:

<j) ~·~~O= ~w'!ft'"s:%~~~ ~ENW.TOR f'ClliROil-IN-I'!AOE CONCRETE PAll. '9ENEAAC" SOO:lO gENERAmft UNIT OR EOUIVIII.ENT SIZill UHrT wm; A SINGlE UNIT SOUNO Pf<F:SSURE I.£VEL Of ..,_ [)911 AT A REI'ERENCE 005rN«:E OF' 2~ I'EET.

<$ PRO!'OS<O COHCI'ru: BtilCI( WALl ENCLOIUR!C ~NISH />NO P.'JNT TO MATCH EXlS"ll!til TRASH ENCLOSURE.

PROO'OS£0 P-"" 4"-10' "'OE S1'lm. Gl\rel W/ FRMIE: "' ~

PROI'05EO OR\"WW.

PRO!'OSEO TREWS

INSf,OU 3' LAYER OF' J/<' CllUSH<IJ GRAI'EL 0'16' RBSi GR0\1/ffi S>RRIER WITHIN OOIRO EQUIPWOM CO~POONO

PROP<lSSl CHo\JiillNK UO

PR<MDE !>Nil INSTIU (1) WI>U ~O!JNTED CLASS "J>aC'" ARE EXni'!GUISHER INSlDE ~ NOI'A Jf< CA!ll~l:'r

PROPOSEO OONCI'OE1"< PAEl

EXI~C L..OI'IOSCAPE N'D.

El<l!lliNG GOOCIIDE SIOEI'IJU<

EXIS11N~ TREE (m>IC>J..)

f:I(ISTlNC CONCRETE BlOCK 1l<OSH ENCL.OSJRE WrT>I TI!EWS

EJCIS11NC TRISH EMCL.Olll.O!£ GJ\TEE

~I_SilN_G __ (,'I!AJNUNK _ FeNt:g__ [](IS"llNG BIJIL.OINO OVEFIHI>HO

EXIS~NG DI"'N INLEf

= OF' EXIST1NO CONCAE!E SIO£W&K

PROI'OS£0 C<:INCRPl' OONr>JNIJENT CUF<S

PROPOSED El£Cil<ICI"- o:!OJOUIT ll<ENCij fOO GE!<ER/ITOR, 1'-6' WlOE • ~·-o• DEEP

Oin8:!10N OF E>1SllNG OIWlWlE \o'(PICA\J

'

ATTACHMEI\"T 9

~~C~ETECTU"E :: INCD"D~~TED

'" t;oL,P" Vl1l,GE ""'" <Uit<" <'""'" o. "~o• ("C),,._,.,.

==,.== PREPARED FOR

~ verllJl!lwireless

P.O. SOX 19707 IRVINE,.CA .92623.,.970.7

{94S) 280~7000

==··== APPROVALS

DI.TE--

-.--· OAT£

~---------- DA'ir: __ _

,,.,,,-- .. --- D:iTE---

==:~

PROJECT NAI.lE

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO, CA 92154

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

=="~==

10/15/13 10/!7/" 10/23/1! OlftJ/14 02/~1/14

DRAWING DATES

00" zo { .. ) : ~ i: ~~g,SION 1 cd I 00~ ZO REVISION 21-1 tOO~ ZP ~'~;VISION :l 10)

~;

SHEET TITLE

GENIEAAlOR ENCLOSURE PLAN

.. P~OJ£CTS\ VERIZON\ 1:125'

==--

l A-2 J

Page 35: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

"' ,... z ~ II:

~ ~

oi>ll 1 i

~~" 8531 i F II' ,

~ -~

.~ i

~~0 R~g "•' -"' a"'~

;;; .. ~ " "

~

~~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ I~ • ~

.. t; • ~

! •

' I· I· I• I? I•

~ o. ~~ ~ ,, z 0 0 0 0

Z m['l '-' 0:: ~ci g -. """' w

1-_, !::;:~ B

o0 z

<( "'"' <l (I) "'""' "' ""

~

§111:1 . "' 1:' 'i~~~e

.. ~ ~:~~; .. ~ ~~~~~ g

..,,.,., .....

~~~~~

---------

~~ :1,~ "'"' <o;

iil~i!l ~ffi~ z" ,z

<

~ :: t;:;

~

II I II M

liP I

<(

, 1iu 11 11 --"------"------"--- ---·-·-----·-···-··-----

,-----------------------------~-~" ----------~- --~--~

' 8 w IE 8 ~ ' . . 15 ;:;- o 5 S r 1t

- " !l'l'i ~ill 5 ~ <'! ~ ti

, .I ~~~'~ 1 lj< <j '~' ' g s~ t "'5 "~-~ ~- 15"§ _, a 0 .!.l; 'i! !:>: ::, b~~!li; ,_fu ri>~ ~ , "-' 1' >•I p o, 'i'' II' ''!

m ! ~ ~ I i ~ !< ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i :~ i i ~ ~ ! ~ i ~ 8 ; I"' '"' '. ,.,,, ,, ! ,, '8 "' ,,, 4 ' "•.

~ ~ ~~ ?~ §: 5 : I!~ I:! ~ ~ ~ a~ ! i lr~_ i-" ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ . ~; ~ ~ ld;!! !; H 1 li ! n , ! I !i I ! !! IIi !i:1 ! I ~ I !I !! ! ~ ~~~~~nil Lil!l:n!!:~~~!·1 1i 11~~i! !!L1H!i1i! 111 1

110 ~I ~:;: gz '-' "l 1ll " !" ij => 1!1 !;: :. ~ • ll! o :d !lo >-'>~ "-/\ iiJ ~ 5 1\ " :;! -.1 q 1'1 '5 o <>(5 5 2i ~~ ~1,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~ ~ @ ~> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!i ~ ~ .. ~ ! ~~ ~~ §~ ~ ~ Is ~ g <5 ~ ~ ! "'! ti ~ i1 =< =<~ -

~ i§ ~~ ~~ ~~ g~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ § 8 i ~ ~ ~~ ~ w fil;;l Olw Olw So fa"' llil 6 6 !il 6 lil 6 Ill ~ B I !"' ii !1 6 fa A0 61! ~!il fil A fil ! ' ' I i ~ a 8 A "- 8 6 liHE 8 ~ "' U>Q ""' ~~ l'l~ l'l l'l "' "' "' "' "' "' ~ "' § w w l'l l'l 3t! i'li'J \!!~ \f~ §1 ~ :g §1 l!: l!: !;1: !;1: !;1: ~ !;1: l'l l'l l'lfi l'l lL ~l'i ~~ ~i!i' "-~ "-., 1; 1; a' ij; K % g g 1'; ~ g "-1:1 ~ ~ "- 1; 1;- :51!1 [.;o [.;o !/j "- 1; "- Iii Iii :i': "- Iii ~ ~ ~ 1; !/j 1; ~ g,w 1; ;a If~ il'~ 1!'!.:; fg [~ ~ if if ~ If If :::: a: 1l' :E :E if h' "- ,_ ~ il' gJ &'15 B~ l.l~ GJ [ ~ ~ Gl '8 ~ ~ 13 13 B B il' o If if JlJ if

lli 0 0 0 0 0 0000<$>{><}{>¢<}%?? <}<)>'"'~ ? % % <??4»?<3><???%000?¢¢¢¢ ¢

~r--- .O-,ij

""-~ ···~····················... 'l !J~---~~ i -· ' - ~

~ ->~t~------~·~·· __ .·., -'t--!1{---~!- 1 0

I '~·-~~-~~ ~ ' ~

......... ~ ""'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~

""~ '' "~,-,---:: .. ---, •' ' _-' I _. ~- .. . ·. - / .. , __ -----

'l~ifi~~~~~-~9~5'1} I ~ ~ ~ R [, " .. ' ·,rno" '.. 1J'~' 1' ~~---~------------.. , ~~~ n __ i,k~-~ ~ -------, -\--\:_~=----=-===-.==.--_ _._==-~==--, 'l· ,,,Vii:T)iice,c;==·'-'·''·-···-····-... , i

¢--)~II

I fr 11~\-~~~~---tf--LLJI __ J[_, [I''~ I

~~~; li l-t ••. < • .-.. • ·' s I • • • • .11-,1 ·"-,1 .~ ·" ~

H:»<3>1.1. .9 • .<>-.l .o-,a~

iii£' ,,, <:f ~ ~ a.. :::

1 8 a: fV ~ _. -5

-Cl w (5

" a: ! <(, 0 ...~,

Z' w!

'i'

! ~

' i

--~ I

I

I

I

1----1

1-~~:i ~~

I <> '·

u,Y tJ

r r

~~ .. '-...~

" ('(9 5 a.. i1l ~ Cl w (5 a:: ~!, Z' w!

Page 36: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

PROPOSEO \GIZtJI! W1!ELESS I>I'ITENI<lS ~OlJI(TUJ BE!iiNO "'--w RF TRANSI'OilS<r SCREENS ON ROOF' OF EXI;a<G BUII.Oii<G- RF TF<ANSPM1ENT IIATERrAI.. SHI>U ~E DETAIL£0, "IWUirn AI<O P>JmEIJ TO MATCH EXISTING BUlllli~G.

• l'l'OF'<lSEO VEIUON MltW::S5 I>NIEN"'" ~Ol.W!ID 8EHI~D NEI't RF TIWISP~ SCREENS ON ROOF OF ["'STING WilDING. Rf" TRANSPARENT MITt:RW. SHAIJ. BE OO>Jl£0, TEXIURE!l ANO PMtllm TO W:rGH E'tSTING BUIL.OINC:.

I I I I '-

PROPCSEO \eliXON MRa£S5 J>N!ENNAS ~OUNlED BEHIND MOO' ,... TRIIHSI'- S!OREENS ON ROOF OF O:ls;'ING 6UIL.Oir<G. RF TIW<SF'AilEHT" W.Tmii>J.. SHALL BE Ot:r>JL.EO, mmJREO MO P>JKTE!l 10 !.lATCH E><ISTING BUIL.OI"G.

AI'<Tl'NNAS B1-B4 AZIW<JTH 100'

ROOF PLAN

/

ll lj.

il li .~ '

' I ' I /

1-r~ / I f

l ( /

) ~

D

(

~ ~

~ICROIIAVE: OISH AZIMUTH T.B.D.

~~Cc:,o:A~ ~ 'fflEJ<~OO~· • BEHIND NEI't RF ~-00 SCREENS 00 RO-OF OF 80SIING BUlllJ .. G. RF 1RI\HSPAAOO ~A1!'RW. SHAIJ. BE OETAIL£0, TEXIUREI> ~D PAIN!Ell ID MATCH ~SllifG BUUJON

• PROI'OSED \liRIZON 'MI!EllSS N<!ENNAS W<llJNTED Bli.HINO NEI't RF JRM<SPI>IiENT ~EENS ON •OOF Of' EJ<ISIING BUILDING. RF TRANSF'AilEIIT t.!l>.lTIMl. SHALL BE OCI">JL.EO, TE>:ruREO J>M). P.AINTa>-TO .... TOol. OJ(ISJ1NG 81JILDINC •.

ATTACHMENT 9

~RGHIT<CTUM :1 lnCmPOR,T<D

"' "'"'""' "'"'"' '"'" ""'" c"''""· <• ••ooa ("OI ,,_.,,.

==,== PREPARED FOR

~ V8nzR!Iwireless

P.O. BOX \9707 .. -IR~IHE, CA. 92S23cc9707.

(949) 2B6-7000

==··== APPROVALS

··~~---·-·---

-,,--·---

'"' '•'•fm,,,------ ~--,_,; _____ _

PROJECT NAME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURM 80ULE\IARO SAN OtEGO, CA 92\54

SAM DIEGO COUNTY

==,==/ 10/15/1> 10/17/1> 10j2J/1:l 01(13/14 0>/21/1<

DRAWING OATES

90~ ZO (oo) 100~ ZO (1o) 100% zc REIII•ION 1 ~-~ 100% ZC HEI'ISIOW 2 f<l 100" Zo R!I'ISIO~ J 1o

=="== SHEET TITlE

R.OOF PLAN

==··==

=="==

A-4

Page 37: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

t-44'-0" '

I ~~\\o" fr- ' 'I • , _, --tn~~~t 't • - ,T--- .

'I-.

.i ~- '

~ ¢-/" ~

' G .I II ,---

r"

ANTENNA PLAN C

-II

ANTENNA PLAN B

,c<W ' 1:

··~· NIIENN.OS 01-04

AZI~UTH ur

• :_,._

~~ ' ' ' !j { i

1'1 '-1>

4> ~

ANTENNA PLAN D

ANTENNA PlAN NOTES: 0 PROP<lSEll TRCO AND EI.B::miC/oL R0Ut1NG INSip.5 NEW CAlli£

TAAY ON """ 5l.EEP0'<5 (O"'ITON 2)

s:> ~o;:g·w""'~lRANw:=-~ I.IOOOEO % ::~.io"8~,~.:·,~.~crr~.~ 0 El<ISilNG -AS W REMI!N {n'PICAI.J

<$> DliSilm; """"""' WAlJ._

<$> PflOPOSEll IJ£RIZOH ~ RRIJ ~OUK!Ul TO ()ISLE TRI\Y (TY"'c.o.l OF 4 POl SECTOR)

¢ PROP05Ell IU.YC<I' DC SURGE PF«l'TECl101< u...,- ~0\INITll TO C.OSL£ TRI\Y

<$> PROPOSC'!l fRA~ING FOR RF "TRONSf'/.ROO ~ (IYP.)

i> PROPOSEll C<lAX C<BL£ lAAY 01'! + , <- PVC Slffl'ffi'l

4,9> E~IS'IlNG BlrjLT -UP ROOF

<j) EXlST1NG ROOF TOP ~~ EQUfi'~~T TO Rtliii>IN

<j} ErJSilNG COA~ C<BLE TRI\Y

!

I/ / ~ICROWAVE DISH AZ11.M1i U,D,

• . ~

J\Jl -~l j -~ J !;o'

"? , ANJU<NAS Al-A+

iff 'j' A.ZIIMH 100'

I -~~;,-~ .

0 '

/b. - ,,_

I~ '-<!>

v'}

I I ''

ANTENNA PLAN A «:'"""'W•1"4"

....,- 101T

SOUTH 10{1'

NO/\fl< 10' IT

ATTACHME!\T 9

"'C~IT<CTUnE ;: INCD.,DRAT<O

"' "'"'" "'"'"' "'"~ '"'"" «""'~~'"'OS ("o) <'<·0<7<

==,== PREPARED FOH

~ ver1ZJ!nwireless

P.O. BOX 19707 IRVINE, CA 92623-9707

(949) 286-7000

=="== APPROVALS

·~ DA"ll;

'' DAOE

0> om

''' ,,.

IOC/IN DAiE

'" D~-

EE;/OUI "''' ·-----· --- ~:

PROJECT NAME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURrl B0Ul£VA,RD SAN ~IEGO, CA 92154

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

==,== 10/15/" 10/17/1' 10/a.l/ll 01/1~/1• 02./21/14

DRAWING DATES

90~ 70 (,) 100% ZO (lc) 100% zo r<£.,SIO~ 1 1"1 100~ ZO R£"SION 2 r<l 100% ZO RrnSION J lc)

==,=~ SHEET TITLE

ANTENNA PLANS

== .. ~== PROJECTS\VERIZOH\ 1 3259

==· "==

A-5

Page 38: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

WEST ELEVATION tcltE: t/10'•1'.(1'

EAST ELEVATION

49.0'$

19 0' F.S.

NORTH ELEVATION

PROI'OSEO ~ ~ AN~NAS NOUNlEil &>IINO NEW RF TRI>NSI'AREtlr SC!lES<S ON ROOF <I' EXISTING 8UfUliNG. Rf' T>W<OPAROO """TEI!IAI. SI<'U- BE DETAILED, TEKl\IP.EO AND ""'r<rnl Til W\TCH £l:IS1'1HG. BUICOING.

. ,, ''

SOUTH ELEVATION

B.EVATION NOTES: PROPOSEO CCOJ< GA!ll.E TRAY MO\lN!Ell 00 W/>U

PROPQSEO ~ ~ "'<!U<IIAS ~OUI!!El) SEHINO NEW RF TRNISf'A!lEiiT Sefi:EEN

F'ROPOSEO \IEReO!I WIR£I.ESS ~'-r)"J MICROWIIIE O.SH MOUNTUl eEHI"O NEW RF TRI>I49"ARENT SCRWI

F'ROPOSOD ...:RaO!I \llnEI.!SS ENCLOSEO EI.IERGE:NCY GE:NEAATOR W!TH A O<IIJ8LE WALL 5U981\SE rua T""K ON A POUI!EIJ-IN-PLJ..CE CONC~IOIE P.OO _(SHO'W!I CIIISHEO)

PROPOSEO WRIIOO \IIREILSS RC\otf<SE SER'IICE GENEII'TOO m:CEPl"ACW: fO' WERCE!<CV GENIJ'>\TOO COOO!'CllON WOJNIDl TO WALL

0 PROF'OSED 0911/GPS A1<1PN0.5 ~OONml TO SUillliNG fASCI~ (n'PI<OJi. OF ~)

PROPOSEO P"R 4'-10' WIOE STEEl. <><TES W/ FIWIE l< S!GNAGE

PROPOS$ 9'--il' HKlH COOCRETE 8l.OO< 50\lNO WALL IWTH SI\JCCO ANIS!I TO I.IA""CH E>aS'I'INS (SHOW>l SHI>DEO)

ElOSilNG N<!ENNIIS TO RE1o111N (TYPICAl)

EX!STIIlG SIGNI.GE

E)ao;llHG. ElUIUIONG \vALl

E>aS1'11lG COWIJN {lYPICAL)

E>ai>!lJ<G_~

rnsnNG Tl<ASH ENc:t.QSlOlE

D:lil'TmG SPRI«< EOOIPWENr BUilDING

I'OOPOSEil MEC!£.'1<~ UNil!l ON A CON<><m FAll (f\1'ICI<I._ OF 2)

PROPOSEO la.EClRCIM,. N<O m_co CO~IT" ROl!TING !JOUNlED ON WALL (OPTIOO 2)

ATTACHMENT 9

-Boom&-_ =bUAREZ-~RCHIHCTU~! :: I~COnPOn~TOD

'" ""'"' Vlll,G( "'"· <UIT< DO C'"'"~ e• "QOB ("0) 04 0<74

I==··== PREPARED FOR

~ venmnwireless

P.O. BOX 19707 liWINE,- CA 9Z623-9707

(949) 286-7000

==,== APPROVALS

~-~----

'_" __ _

• DATE:

'"' """

-.-,-------ops-------- 01-,---

~--

PROJECT NAME

SATURN BLVD

595 SATURN BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO, CA 92154

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

"== ORAWING DATES

oo~ zo (,.,) tOO% zo D•l \00~ ~p ,!;'II;IOH \ 1"1 100~ ZD R<'IISION ~ ro 100~ ZO REI'1SIO" 0 lo)

.. == SHEET TITLE

EXTERIOR. ElEVATIONS

== .. == PR(>JECJll\ V!:RIZOH\ 1025'

=="==

A-6

Page 39: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

' L-----

' ~-;r ~---e -' "

·-- -· PROJECT AREA DETAIL

""'"' - ,. - 20'

[!Ei!:c!.'!O~R~R!<SP~,O<~O!IN!OUT,Oc>>C,HHoOO'U'L£"''"~6~"· "" """"""-'" "'"' """'"'" ""'"'"'"""~' ""'"'"" 4100 "'"'''" """' '""" r.TL< """"· "''" "'"" ""'" '" """' """"'" "'· ""'' """'""'"'"'·"'""'"' '"") "'~-""' ""' =-o~"' l!El<5 11<1€ FWND "' SJJO """lllm<T '"' "" eEI'rn!:NOOD ON TH" """- ""'"""'""' """"Tll><5. o=JOOo=, milA>""""""'""' 1<1() "'mRS <mED "'''"'" """""' """"""''"'" "OO.T NFE« W: 5'-<3.00<0T """"""'"' <ONTeHS "USTB<RE'II<'""TO"~{""<JAOS.

1><: Fm TlCIT """"'"" o< s.JD L<><D """' •or IN= """" 0" """"" w :~~~~';;..''/il,~.fi1:'l','i:~ m'::-~:~~.1\1: m>J AI->WI> TJ<5 "'-""" !"'.ClPEJm AAD IS O<P1::r.D HffiECN.

'"' ••or lH>r ''l<<ai5HF a' "-'JO W<IJ 00£5 NOT WllJJDE ~'""' Cl' ACCESS

@-- ~""..1,"/,"\'.;·:n"~"',~"'~J" =..:'I~J:'tW~'k"""'~"T I<'F[C1S r.~ """""" "'"""""' '"' " w.ottc ~

"'-- ~·~~~.;~&' o"'::4"iitl' ~;r'..iit~"' "~'11\'c""LM~r, Mlftij' >.::.' f'EC(>;j]ED "'lEI.<"" ,_ "" " ""-" ""- "'""" or ""'-~"'- =~ ""'

lrnf '"'""' lHE >JI>.IICT P""""TY '"' " DOPICiEil HEF£0<

@--- ~.~~~"": ~~J·~ ID'"J~.~~'f,'f'/,0"6,;;~' ~k"""":ii' ""-' >J'I-"EC'To"" '""""'''"'PEIID, ~"'-""""'IN t<'.lL"" M<O "NOT

"'""" """"" 0- :~~'"~~f'1l~'".~~"ot~~'""~' >HI; """ """'"' '"' •m=r I'R"""TY, ~ 6LMKET IN !<o\1\JRE I'W r. NO•

'"-"'''""-(f)- ;;:';.lm,"" w'"~';';i'/lf'&n~~iH'JWfg, 'i1:'1:.'a~or"'l~"' " Ol"''<ET~ "'~"'' -'"D" NOT PLOmil Hl>![<t<_

@- ~ ~'/Jl.\%.'l:'~\7;ftili.~"E.'i-~~:~~""~~ -

8Q!JNDABY NOJE·

}.SSESSOfi'S PARlfl NUMBER "'"' ,,._,~_., DAJU>l STAJEMENT:

'"' '""'"' ="""""" '"" sJ"'"" ~"' """"""" """""""' "'"" """' "'" '· = '""~' "'""<Il. "'' """'"' '"""'" ""'' """'" """"" .,.,. '"' S"<OOD """' <TATII>< ",:>11' " ~lOW<' <>< "'"""' Cl' ''-'""' ,.....,.

'·'. "'"'""" < ''-''"''""FOR n,; """"'IS O:Y ~ Sl>< 01<-.o ""'·"' FWG !OC.'1EI) ''TOE so.J1H<AST ""''"' OF THE I"TffiOO<OTTOI> 0" f"-'< A\9<1" '"' :Ole SU,'ET. EJ.Eio''""" "·"" ""'" "''' ''" L""'-

UlflRDitJAIFS· ,j, LATITUDC, 30'J5'00.5SB" K 't' LONC!TUOC, 117'05'"-'"" W DATED AS Cl'1 M"Y JO, 2006 OATU"' NADBJ

J.Eruill.:.. >.01' - '-"<OOD:llE>ING L<tT

"' -""""'""' '"""'- """"" ClF - """" lN', """' CT - Cl<lil!W

" - '""" '""" " -"-"""'""'-'"'" EV - Ell!\:Tf'O 1'/olJLT "' - fOOtlJ)

,. - """" ~'"'""" "" - "" "m> "' - "'""""- ""'""" " - '""' ''"'""' "' - ""' <F "'"' rE - m•'" '""-'"""" !P -T<I"<FP-E<

'·'· - ""-" '"""' (<~?) - "'"'"-

"' -""'"" '""'' ' - ''""

TcR. I I If---

PARENT PARCEL OVER\11EW

0 0 w 0

z ""' ([)

ATTACHMENT 9

-Boom &­=bUAR.._EZ~ ~~CHITEt:lVR~ ~; lnCO~'OIIATfD

IIIC-.o•o•auoooll•t .. m!OI CIIOLOIAO, CA HO<IO (700) ....... .

"==

P.o. eox 19707 I!MMt. CA 9262H707

{949) 26&-7000

==,==

-• • ~

.,.. M

0/~

~

~· ~· -~· ~· ~· f:

fi'KIJ[Cli' MAW~

!i0S SAWIIH EIOUD..EYAIID SAM 011000, CA. 921!>4

==··==

===·-~==

==,==

==,==

C-1

Page 40: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 41: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACH:VIENT 10

-----~·-------------

OTAY MESA-NESTOR COMMUNITY PLAJI.'NING GROUP MEETING MINUTES

Members Present: Dist. 1 John Swanson Dist. 2 Sam Mendoza Dist. 3 Ed Abrahim Dist. 5 Gabriel Uribe Dist. 6 Maria Mendoza Dist 7 Robert Broomfield Dist. 8 Edgar Gonzalez

Guests Present:

Ravi Saldanta, resident Marcella Robles, resident John Holder, guest Coralie Zumstein, resident

12 March, 2014

Dist. 9 J acki Farrington DisL 10 Bob Mikloski Dist. I I Albert Velasquez Dist. 12 Carlos Sanchez Dist. 13 Brian McGonagill Dist. 14 Wayne Dickey Dist. 15 Walt Zumstein Dist 16 Steve Schroeder

Ruth Garcia, guest Carole Beason guest

Members Absent: Dist. 4 Diane Porter

1. Call to Order/Jntroduction of Members: The meeting wa;.; called to order at 6:35p.m. by Chair Albert Velasquez, at the Oiay Mesa Nestor Branch Library. He welcomed aU Board members and members ·of the community to the meeting of the Otay .Mesa~ Nestor Community Planning Group (OMNCPG). .. ____ - ----~--- ------

2. Appl'oval of minutes- A Motion was made by Walt Zumstein to approve the minutes of the November 13,2013, Ol\1NCPG meeting. The motion passed unanimously.

3. Non-Agenda Public Comments: a. Walt Zumstein reported that he has observed bicycle riders being stopped by police. b. Gabrie1 Uribe commented on the numerous lunch trucks parked for long periods around the

South Bay area.

4. SDPD Community Relations: Otlicer Carlos Lacau-a, [email protected] (61.9) 424-0440. No report.

5. Council District 8 Report: Vivian Moreno, vmoreno@sandiegq,_g_q_y_ (619) 533-6394. a. The City of San Diego has about $28 million in surplus money.

l.The City Council intends to direct this money to: a. Additional Police and Lifeguard equipment. b. Construction of a temporary fire station in ColU1cil District 4. c. Improve the City website.

b. Councllmember Alvarez will have office ltours at the Otay Mesa Nestor Library 011 March 21st from 1 0 am to 12 pm.

c. There will be a Women's Resource Fair on March 15, 2014, at the Golden Hall in dov,rntown San Diego, from 8:30am to 2:30pm

Page 42: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ArTACHMENT 10

6. SubwCommittee Reports: Traffic Calming, Project Review, Public Facilities Financing Plan. No reports.

7. Action Item: The chair will entertain a motion to approve the following project: Verizon Wireless PTS#348557. Installation ofwirelr..ss ante1mas behind the parapet on the roof of an existing building located at 595 Saturn Blvd. In addition, other associated antenna equipment is proposed to be placed on grade behind a walled enclosure designed to match the existing buildings. Contact: Kerrigan Diehl, PlanCom, Inc., 760w587-3003 [email protected]

Voting result: item approved

8. Informational Item: City of San Diego Verizon Wireless No. 330113: In Berry Park, a City of San Diego City Park, Iocared in the 2100 block of Leon Avenue, Verizon is proposing the following: constmction of a 30' tall bell tower, housing 12 antennas and RRU's, in the northeast comer of the property. Also, the proposal includes the--construction of a 3 50 square foot st.ruchtre housing the radio and power eq1..tipment, with a 200 sq. ft. masomy wall enclosure housing a 30K generator on the south side, adjacent to an existing building. Contact: Doug Munson, Senior Planner 760~390~7727 [email protected]

fhis project was referred to the Project Review subcommittee for :flrther review.

9. Informational Item: City of San Diego Palm Plaza No. #327653. On the edge of the Montgomery High School football field, located ai 3250 Palm Ave San Diego, CA 92154, Verizon Wireless is proposing the foflowing: remove and replace (3) LTE panel antennas on an existing Hght pole telecomimmications facility. The purpose of this facility is to provide wireless communications coverage as weH as enhanced emergency 911 services. Contact: Brooke E. \Villimns, -619-260-0813 [email protected] ·· · -----

This project was refened to the Project Review subcommittee tOr further review.

8. Chair's Report: No report.

9. City Planner's Report: Michael Prinz, [email protected] (619) 533-5931: no report

10. Adjournment: 7:45 p.m.

Respectively submitted by John Swanson, Secretary

Page 43: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Date Action

11.21.2013 First Submittal

Verizon Wireless Saturn Blvd PROJECT CHRONOLOGY

PTS #348557 !NT #24004229

Description

Project Deemed Complete

12.13.2013 First Assessment Letter

01.15.2014 Second Submittal

02.20.2014 Second Assessment Letter

02.26.2014 Third Submittal

04.04.2014 All issues resolved

05.22.2014 Plamring Commissior. Hearing

Total Staff Time: lncl.uding City Holidays and

Furlough

Total Applicant Time: Including City Holidays and

Furlough

Total Pro,ject Running Time: From Deemed Complete to PC

Hearing

ATTACHMENT i1

City Review

22 days

36 days

37 days

48 days

143 days

182 days

Applicant R espouse

33 days

6 days

39 days

'

I

Page 44: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 45: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 12

Ownership Disclosure Statement

ApptOV(ll Type: Check appropriate bm: for type of approval (s) requested: I Neighborhood Use Pam1il I CoaslaJ Development Permit

IX Neighborhood Development Permit r Site Developmfill_t Penni! I Planned Development Permit r Conditional Use Per'Tlit !·Variance ITontative Map I Vesting Tentatve ,\llap I Map Waiver I Land Use Plan Amendment • IX Other WCF- Telecom

VZ: "Saturn Blvd"

595 Sawn Boulevard, San Diego, CA 92154 ~~~------~--~--------------------~--~-----

1 No

C1tyiStata1Z1p:

~Phone No: Fax No:

rgnature: Dafe:

Street AL1dmss:

CltyiStateiZrp:

I

!1st all persons

the permit, all additional pages if needed. A signature

all project parcels for which a Disposition and il The applicant is respons;ble for notifying 1l1e Project

."!'"'~'iooc i processed or considered. Cha:1ges in ownership are to be given to on the subject property. Failure to provide accwate and current ownership

Name ot lnoiVIouat \tYPe or prmc,,•, ~~~--------

I Owner !Tenant/Lessee J-R.edev;iOpm;;tiiAge-m:Y··--

Str!let ~\Caress:

Phone No: Fax No:

::;lgna!ure : a e:

owner r- Tenant/Lessee I Radevelopment Agency

Street Address:

GitytState/Zrp:

'P"ho~,~,-.N~,-~----------,,",.c"""~.------ P"hlne ND:-----------c,;c.,"NC.oo,-----

ignature :· Dale: Signature; Date:

Printed on recycled paper. Visrt our web stte at www sandiego.goy@evii!lopmiint-servicliii Upon request, this inlormation is available in allemative formats for persoco;:.ccwcithcc:di='""="citi='='·c_ ________ _

DS-318 (5-o5f -

Page 46: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 12

Prcje~t Title~~-~~-... ~--- ., .. -~---- .. - .. ---··---.. --~··r

1'"?roject NO~('FOrCity Use -0/i)YJ_ .. _, __ l

VZ: Saturn Bl'<d. -.... - .. -----------.. ·--~----·----- • " _____)

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or print): SPP Corp;_Davis Jack WLLC: K~!!.~off Alb10rt W LLC

' IX ow~er r Tenant/Lessee

, 2013

Corporate'Partnership Name (type or print}:

r 0\'1/Tler I Tenant'Lessee

Street Arldress:

Fax No:

Title (type or print)·

r Owner I Tenani!Lessee s:reet'"AddrBSS:· .. ··'------------------

Phon!~ No: Fax No:

Name 151 Corporate UlfiGiillPanner (fyopoeooCc Opcffimn,tY' --------

t'iorporate/Partnership Name (type or pnnt):

I Owner

Street Ad cress:

City/Stale/Zip:

Phone No:

j Tenant'lessee

Fax No;

~iQj Corporate Officer/Partner (typeCo0c"~=i~otcl,,--------

~==~,---~~~ ~-----Title (type or pcm!):

Signature; '"'"'"··-----0,;,;;;,_;. -----·

Corporate/Partnership Name (type or pnnt)~

J Owner j Tenant/Lessee

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

~One No: ··-----F<ixC1NOCo;c, ---

"'fltle (type or print):

S·gnature""?~----·

""CCrporate/Partnership r:lame (type or prlnt):

r owner r Tenani!Lessee.

·Street Address:

City IState/Zp,

'flhone No: Fax No:

Name o{ Corporate OlliceriPart'iier TIIt;;yprueCoOOc'<p;;o;;,t;t)~------

Title (type or print)~

Signature: Date: Sigriature ,,-------

~==============~===============~

Page 47: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SITE jUSTIFICATION Verizon "Saturn Blvd" 595 Saturn Boulevard San Diego, CA 92154

ATTACHMENT l3

The project proposes to install a WCF for Verizon Wireless located <!.t 595 Saturn Blvd. The project wi!I consists of the installation of (16) panel antennas, (16) Remote Radio Units and a MW dish fa~ade mounted to om existing building. Associ<~ ted equipment and emergency baci<-up generator to be located at grade in the rear of the commercial center adjacent to the l-5 southbound within CMU enclosures designed to match the existi1lg buiiding.

The property is zoned CC-1-13/CC-2-3.

SITE DESIGN

More specifically, the antennas will be configured with 4 sectors o£ 4 antennas and 4 RRUs at each sector. The antennas will be placed on the north, south, east and west buildir.g elevations. The associated equipment necessary to oper.;;tc the facility including an emergency back-up generator will be located at grade within a 12'x20' indoor equipment enclosure designed to match tlle ::enter. The emergency back-up generator .is located within its mvn separate 11'x12' CMU enclosure. 'Ille cmtennu. design uses a prefened City motmling guidelll-;_e whilE' the equipmenl is

located at the center's rear so that it is not visible from public vie\vs. Additionally, any views from I-5 are insulated by' the sites own landscape trees along with the trees located directly east of the site along the freeway :ight o.f way.

PREFERENCE 3 LOCATION:

The project is J Preference 1 location but a process 2 design given thot the proposed equipment with the inclusion of the generator exceeds the 250 sf equipment footprint requirement.

However we believe ihat the facility <JS designed is consistent with Jll relevant regulations <Jnd

~vill be wdl integrated and naturally screening from vantage points or surrounding properties.

CO-LOCATION OF WiRELESS FACILITIES

There are two existing wireless carriers at this site: AT&T and Sprint.

Page 48: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Saturn Blvd 595 Saturn Blvd San Diego, CA 92154

Legend

0 Search Ring * Selected Site

O Exlstlng alte• w ithin 1 mile rad ius:

No sites within 1 mile

Q Alternative Sites:

1. Wal Mart 575 Saturn Blvd Southland Plaza, San Diego, CA 92154

2. Home Depot 525 Saturn Blvd Southland Plaza, San Dieoo, CA 92154

Legend

C4W.., ...... 0- -.;My C_,.<Wtf"'"" l.~ao ...........

b>nlne l!J» .~

11/15/2013

~ verrmn

N.<nCJNALC~ \

\ \

Official Zoni11g Map \ \ \

\ '---

\ \ ---- -~ --CHlll... -----

City of San Diego Development Services Department

( __ _/

__ / ---

GRID SCALE 800

DATE· 11/221200l!

_,

Page 49: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Coverage Levels:

D Excellent

~ Good/Va~lnble • Poor

--A-'FFA:Gfll\4E~l~ jaturn Blvd 595 Saturn Blvd San Diego, CA 92154

~ vei'Z9J1wireless

Page 50: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 51: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) IJ/15/2013

PHOTO STUDY & KEY MAP

PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A NEW DIGITAL PCS

COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY

Verizon Wireless "Saturn Blvd"

595 Saturn Boulevard San Diego, CA 92154

Prepared for: City of San Diego

Development Services Department 1222 First Avenue

San Diego, CA 92101

Prepared by:

PlanCom, Inc. Contractor Representatives for

Verizon Wireless

302 State Place Escondido, CA 92029

Contact: Kerrigan Diehl, Planning Consultant (619) 223-1357

November 15, 2013

ATTACHMENT 14

Page 1

Page 52: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 11/15/2013

Aerial View of Subject Site

ATTACHMENT 14

Page 7

Page 53: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 1 J/15/2013

Looking North

Looking South

A TTACHtV1ENT 14

Page 2

Page 54: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 11/15/2013

Looking East

Looking West

ATTACHMENT 14

Page 3

Page 55: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 11/15/2013

North Elevation

East Elevation

ATTACHMENT 14

Page 4

Page 56: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 14

~ venzgnw;reless

Southwest Elevation

South Elevation (Gen located behind trash enclosure - not visible)

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 11 /15/2013

PageS

Page 57: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

~ 1lelll,gllwirefess

Photo Study (Saturn Blvd.) 11/1512013

ATTACHMENT 14

West Elevation

Equipment location

Page 6

Page 58: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 59: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 15

DRAFT FINDINGS

Verizon Wireless "Saturn Blvd"

FINDINGS:

NEIGHBORHOOD USE PERMIT & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

1.The p·ropcsed development wiU not .adversely a·ffeet the appUeabl·e land use plan;

The project has been designed not to impact the existing uses on site or surrounding land uses identified

in the community Plan. The antennas are recessed behind FRP screening along the rooftop parapet to

integrate with the existing building's roofline and to match Sprint's recent approval. The project is

proposed on a property and building with an established telecom use on site. The recessed antennas

al!ow the project to be more integrated with the existing architecture in order to achieve better visual

integration as recommended by the LDC and wireless guidelines. The proposed equipment has been

designed to meet established noise, footprint needs of the applicant and complement the site's overall

design aesthetic. The project as desfgned will not adversely affect the relevant community or !and use

plan.

2, The proposed development l\ill not be detrimental to the public health~ safety l and welfare; and

The Telecommunication Act of 1996 preempts local governments from regulating the

"placement, construction and modification of wireless communication facilities on the basis of

the environmental effects of Radio Frequency (RF) emissions to the extent that such facilities

comply with the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) standards for such emissions." The

proposed project would be consistent with the FCC's regulations for wireless facilities.

3.The proposed de'\·elopment WI comp]y with the appltcable regulaiions of the Land Development Code, indudlng an.y allowable deviations pursuant to the Land Deve[copment Code.

Th_e proposed wireless communication facility will comply with a!l of the relevant regulations of

the underlying zone and Land Development Code. LDC Section 141.0420(g){l) and

141.0420(g)(2) requires that WCFs utilize concealment when and where possible. The recessed

antennas behind the modified parapet directly meet this section of the LDC. The project does

not propose any deviations however a Neighborhood Development Permit is necessary in lieu of

a Limited Use Permit in order for the equipment footprint to exceed 250sf. Telecom is an

established use on site and the redesigned antennas allow the project to be more ir.tegrated

with the existing architecture to achieve better visual integration as recommended by the LDC

and wireless guidelines.

Page 60: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACHMENT 15

The proposed antenna installation is fully concealed and the associated equipment and generator

locations are located completely behind an existing commercial retail building. As such the proposed

site does not and will not impact the public access and recreation policies of the California Coastal Act.

Page 61: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

ATTACH:VIENT 15

DRAFT FINDINGS

Verizon Wireless "SATURN BLVD"

FINDINGS:

Coastal Development Permit M Section 126.0708

1. The proposed coastal development will not encroach upon any existing physical accessway that is legally used by the public ol' any proposed public accessway identified in a Local Coastal Program land use plan; and the proposed coastal development will enhance and pa·otect public views to and along the ocean and other scenic coastal areas as specified in the Local Coastal Program land use plan.

The proposed modifications will not encroach upon any existing physical access way that is legally used

by the public or any proposed access way identified in a Local Coastal Program land use plan. The entire

project is located private property and all equipment and ancillary equipment are entirely wlthin the

sfte's property lines. The antenna design will be behind modified portions of the rooftop parapet so that

antennas and cabling wili not be visible from public views. Additionally, the proposed equipment

enclosure is located directfy behind the existing building not withi:~ any view sheds. The proposed WCF

will provide wireless coverage in the area in a manner that is effect;vely integrated with the

surroundings. The WCF will not impact views to and along the ocean or other scenic coastal areas

especially in light of the cor.ceaied design.

2. The proposed coastal development will not adversely affect environmentally sensitive lands.

The project is located in a commercial strip center on a previously developed parcel. Therefore the

project will not adversely affect environmentally seFJsitive lands.

3. The propm;ed coastal dewlopment is in conformity with the certified Local Coastal Program land u·se plan and complies with all regulations of the certified Implementation Progl'am.

The proposed WCF is in conformity with the Local Coastal Program. The site is currently located on a

previously developed retail commercial building. Additionally, this WCF is located on a site with an

established telecommunications use and the concealed design results in a more integrated visual

aesthetic as the antennas will be screened from public views. The antennas as indicated are concealed

and the equipment location behind the existing building will not obstruct ocean views.

4. For every Coastal DeYelopment Permit issued foi- any coastal development between the nearest public road and the sea or the shoreline of any body of water located within the Coastal Overlay Zone the coastal development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act.

Page 62: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques
Page 63: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

THE CaTY OF SAN DIEGO

DATE OF NOTICE: May 7, 2014

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION

DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING: LOCATION OF HEARING:

PROJECT TYPE:

PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT:

COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: COUNCIL DISTRICT:

CITY PROJECT MANAGER: PHONE NUMBER/E-MAIL:

May 22,2014 9:00A.M. Council Chambers, 12th Floor, City Administration Building, 202 C Street, San Diego, California 92101

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT & COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ENVIRONMENTAL EXEMPTION/PROCESS 4 348557 VERJZON WIRELESS SA TURN Shelly Kilbourn

Otay Mesa Nestor 8

SIMON TSE, Development Project Manager (619) 687-5984, [email protected]

As a property owner, tenant or person who has requested notice, you should know that the Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to approve, conditionalJy approve, or deny an application to install a new Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) located at 595 Saturn Boulevard in the CC-1-3 zone of the Otay Mesa Nestor Community Plan area and Council District 8. This WCF consists of twelve antennas concealed behind the rooftop parapet, one 253 square foot equipment enclosure and one emergency generator located inside a 144 square foot enclosure. The project requires a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) and a Planned Development Permit (PDP) consolidated Process 4, Planning Commission decision.

The decision of the Planning Commission is finaJ unless the project is appealed to the City Council. In order to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission you must be present at the public hearing and file a speaker sl ip concerning the application or have expressed interest by writing to the Planning Commission before the close of the public hearing. Please do not e-mail appeals as they will not be

Page 64: REPORT To THE PLANNING CoMMISSION...stealth the proposed antetmas from the public view and that it was a Preference 1 location. ... otherwise use camouflage and screening techniques

accepted. See Information Bulletin 505 "Appeal Procedure", available at www.sandiego.gov/development-services or in person at the office of the City Clerk, 202 "C" Street, Second Floor. The appeal must be made within 10 working days of the Planning Commission decision. If you wish to challenge the City's action on the above proceedings in court, you may be limited to addressing only those issues you or someone else have raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written in correspondence to the City at or before the public hearing.

This project was determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act on April 7, 2014 and the opportunity to appeal that determination ended April21, 2014.

If you have any questions after reviewing this information, you can contact the City Project Manager listed above.

This information will be made available in alternative formats upon request. To request an agenda in alternative format or to request a sign language or oral interpreter for the meeting, call Support Services at (619) 321-3208 at least five working days prior to the meeting to insure availability. Assistive Listening Devices (ALD's) are also available for the meeting upon request.

Internal Order Number: 24004418

Revised 10-4-12 HMD-