REPORT ON THE...The survey was flown at a mean clearance of 300 m feet with the altimeter producing...
Transcript of REPORT ON THE...The survey was flown at a mean clearance of 300 m feet with the altimeter producing...
S2B10SE0083 2.11238 BURCHELL LAKE010
il iii ll
REPORT ON THE
COMBINED AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
ON THE PROPERTY OF
MR. W. MCCHRISTIK
MOSS TONWHSIP AND BURCHELL LAKE
LAKE AREA, ONTARIO
BY
H. FERDERBER GEOPHYSICS LTD.
May, 1988Val d'Or, Quebec
Lisa Ahern, B.Se, Geologist
l
l
i
i i i
REPORT ON THE COMBINED AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
ON THE PROPERTY OF MR. W. MCCHRISTIE
MOSS TOWNSHIP AND BURCHELL LAKE AREA, ONTARIO
I INTRODUCTION -
Between January 27th and 33th, 1988 a combined airborne
geophysical survey was completed on the property of Mr. Kayne
McChristie in Moss Township and Burchell Lake Area, Ontario.
Magnetic and VLF-e]ectromagnetic data was collected by the
airborne Division of H. Ferderber Geophysics Ltd. The survey was
flown from a base at Thunder Bay, Ontario. A total of 149.9
miles of data was collected.
The magnetic survey provides information which helps define
the underlying geological structures and identifies any potential
economic concentrations which may contain variations in accessory
magnetic minerals. The VLF-electromagnetic survey outlines
conductive zones which may represent shear zones and/or metallic
sulphide deposits containing gold mineralization.
l i ii i
d. ^M
i i ili
lli
ii
'•m
2~
PROPRRTY DESCRIPTION, ^OgATION AND^ ACCESS
The McChristie Property is composed of two blocks of claims
covering approximately 1232 hectares in Moss Township and the
Burchell Lake Area, Thunder Bay Mining Division, Ontario. Sixty-
two claims are located in the northeastern part of Moss Township
and the northwestern part of the Burchell Lake Area, directly
north of Highway 802. The second block of fifteen mining claims
is located in the northeastern part of Moss Township, and
directly south of Highway 802. The claims are registered with
the Office of the Mining Recorder at Thunder Bay, Ontario, and
are listed in Appendix 1.
The property is situated three miles west and south of the
town of Burchell Lake, and approximately sixty-four miles west of
the city of Thunder Bay. Highway 802 separates the two claim
blocks of the McChristie Property in a northeasterly direction.
The smaller group of claims lie over a small nameless lake, and
both claim blocks contain small rivers and creeks which join Moss
Lake and Rainbow Lake in the south to Burchell Lake in the
northeast. The property is forested and topographic relief
appears to be moderate.
Supplies, services and manpower are readily available in the
Thunder Bay - Fort Francis area.
l
l
-3-
GEOLOGY
The Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Compilation
m Series, Atikokan-Lakehead Sheet, Map 2065, outlines the geology
underlying the property. A unit of undifferentiated
I metavolcanics with some metasediments strike northeastward,l BP
'. through the southern and eastern parts of the northern claim
j l block and may underlie the extreme northwestern corner thetm southern group. Acid metavolcanics (rhyolite and trachyte) arel
thought to be situated under the eastern third of the south
l group. Two bodies of acid igneous and metamorphic rocks underlie
the western two thirds of the southern claim block and intrude
the metavolcanics in the northeastern corner of the north group.
I The undifferentiated metavolcanics, underlying the north block,
are in contact with metasedimentary rocks (arkose, greywacke,
slate, mica schists and gneisses). A major fault, subparallel to
the Knife Lake Fault, cuts both claim groups in a north-
northeasterly direction.
One past producer, the Kerry Mine, is located in the
central part of Moss Township, approximately two miles south of
the McChristie Property. Pre-Kenoran mafic to intermediate
metavolcanics are cut by a northeast-trending feldspar dyke and
l
l l
li i i i im
-4-
an auriferous quartz vein, both traced over 3,000 feet. Gold
assays were erratic, the highest was 4.66 ounces from a 9 inch
wide vein section. Recovery of gold averaged 0.21 oz/ton of ore
milled. Between 1932 and 1942, 29,948 ounces of gold, and
172,375 ounces of silver were recovered.
The only other gold occurrence within Moss Township is
located 6-8 miles southwest of the McChristie Property. The
Lobanor Prospect is located east of Moss Lake and 400 feet north
of Snodgrass Lake. Pre-Kenoran felsic to intermediate
metavolcanics enclose mafic intrusives and three east-striking
mineralized zones. The South Zone is 1,100 feet long and
averaged from 0.06 oz An/ton over 13.9 feet to 0.16 Oz Au/ton
over 17.5 feet. The Middle Zone gave erratic gold values. The
North Zone returned two values 0.27 oz Au/ton over 1.0 feet, and
0.24 feet oz Au/ton over 2.5 feet.
Directly east of the large claim block are two copper
occurrences, on the western shores of Burchell Lake.
D "*
SlJRVEYMETiODS
The survey was completed using a 1 972 Cessna 172,
fixed-wing aircraft, call letters CF-EWK, owned and operated by
H. Ferderber Geophysics Ltd. The pilot and navigator/operator
were Y. Saucier and D. Thai, respectively, of Val d'Or.
Geophysical sensors were mounted in modified wing tips.
The geophysical, navigation and data acquisition systems are
described below.
Magnetometer
The magnetometer used was GEM Systems GSM-11, high
sensitivity airborne proton (Overhauser) magnetometer. The
instrument continuously measures the Earth's magnetic field at a
0.01 gamma sensitivity for l reading per second or 0.05 gamma to
10 readings per second at a 0.1 gamma absolute accuracy. The
analog output is on 3 channels, from l to 10,000 gammas full
scale.
l
VLF-EM System
l ~lIB A Herz Totem 2A VLF-EM System was used to measure the
m changes in the total field and in the vertical quadrature field
on two frequencies simultaneously, with an accuracy of J-%. The
l primary transmitting station of Seattle, Washington, (NLK),
frequency 24.8 KHz was employed in survey.
Radar Altimeter
B The ground clearance was measured with a King 10/10 A
radar altimeter. The survey was flown at a mean clearance of 300
m feet with the altimeter producing an accuracy of 5*^ (15 feet) atir
a this altitude.
Tracking Camera and Video Centre
A RCA TC-200 colour video camera and Galaxy 200 video
centre was used to record the flight path on standard VHS type
video tapes. Manual fiducial s were indicated on the picture
-7-
l frames for reference with digital printout. Flight path recovery
was aided using a Panasonic Colour Video Monitor-81300 and Video
l Cassette Recorder AG-2500.
l Dart a Acgu^isitaon ^System
lA Picodas Group Inc. PDAS 1100 data acquisition system
: | featuring seven analog inputs with two frequency inputs and
m external interfacing was used. A Termiflex Corp. ST/32 Keyboard
control unit and Sharp Corp. LCD display unit are connected to
l the data acquisition system. At present this system stores the
altimeter VLF-1 inphase, VLF-1 quadrature, VLF-2 inphase, VLF-2
l quadrature, magnetic field (coarse), magnetic field (fine), and
m the fourth difference (noise), and fiducials on 3.5 inch floppy
disk drive. The data is then printed out in digital and profile
l form.
The survey was conducted on northwest-southeast lines
l were flown at spacings of 328 feet at a speed of approximately 90
miles per hour. Navigation was visual using airphoto mosaics, at
a scale of one inch to 1320 feet, manual fiducials and the flight
path recovery system as references.
i
il
p,
i i i ii i
-8-
DATA PRESENTATION
Flight lines, fiducial points and geophysical responses
were reproduced from the airphoto mosaics at a scale of one inch
to 1320 feet (1:15,840). The outline of the claim blocks and
claim map are shown on each map sheet.
The aeromagnetic data was corrected for diurnal
variations by using a base line as reference. The data was then
reduced to a base level of 60,000 gammas, contoured at 25, 100,
and 1000 gamma intervals and presented on Maps MG-1.
A base value was determined for the VLF-EM data and the
change in the total field strength as a percentage of the base
value was calculated. The values were plotted on Maps EM-1 and
EM-2. The positive values were contoured at intervals of 2%.
The conductor axes were determined and labelled l, 2, 3, etc. No
priority was attached to the labelling system.
ii iirr u
iiii
l
I'
l
-9-
SURVEY RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
Magnetic Survey
A prominent moderate to high anomalous zone covers both the
north and south claim blocks, exhibiting values ranging from 500
to more than 1000 gammas above background. This zone forms a
band of highs and lows striking northeasterly through both claim
blocks. The southwestern half of the band contains three
northeasterly striking highs, whereas the northeastern half of
the band contains a number of small discontinuous northeasterly
highs.
North Claim Block
Within the northeastern claims of the north block, there are
a series of discontinuous moderate anomalies in the range of 600
gammas above background which probably correspond to presumed
metasediment beds interlayered within the metavolcanics.
Along the northern boundary, an anomalously low magnetic
area, with values less than 400 gammas is situated over the
presumed beds of metasediments.
li;
l
lM
l
l
l
l
l
l
-10-
In the centre part and along the southern boundary of the
north block, the magnetic values increase noticeably to form a
prominent magnetic high located between the two claim blocks.
The shoulder of this high has a steep gradient and mag values
range from 600 - 800 gammas above background. This zone roughly
coincides with the presumed contact of the metasediments to the
north, and the band of metavolcanics, striking in a northeasterly
direction between the two claim blocks.
Located between the north and south claim blocks in the
west, is a strong magnetic high with values up to and in excess
of 1200 gammas above background. This high probably corresponds
to the northeasterly striking metavolcanic band located between
the claim blocks. The southern shoulder of this high magnetic
anomaly is very steep and coincides with the presumed
northeasterly striking fault.
South Claim Block
Along the northwestern boundary of the south claim block is
a moderate north-northeasterly striking trough anomaly which it
thought to overlie to a granitic unit. Values range from 700 to
800 gammas above background.
l
l
l
-11-
Within the northern section of the south claim block is a
very strong magnetic anomaly, with values up to and in excess of
l 1000 gammas . above background. This high corresponds to the
presumed location of the contact between the acid raetavolcanics
l to the south and the granitic unit to the north.
M Similarly in the southwestern section of the south claim
block, another strong magnetic anomaly with values up to and in
l excess of 800 gammas above background is located along the
presumed contact between the acid metavolcanics, to the south,
and the granite unit, to the north.
j Along the eastern boundary of the south claim block, the
1 shoulder of the central magnetic high has magnetic values ranging
l between 500 and 700 gammas above background. The location of,'si
-^ this magnetic gradient lies near the acid metavolcanic unit
situated to the south. The rhyolitic unit which extends in a
\m northeasterly direction north from Moss Lake may contain
-j accessory magnetic minerals which results in the moderate
fi magnetic signature.
i
l'l VLF-Electromagnetic Surveyi
I The airborne VLF-electromagnetic survey was successful in
outlining fourteen conductors. Conductors 1-8 in the north block
iii
-12-
and conductors 9-14 in the south claim block. All conductors
within the property strike approximately in a northwesterly
direction.
North Claim Block
M Conductor l is a short northwesterly trending conductor
located in the northeastern part of the north block. Its
mm position roughly overlies the location of the presumed
F.
northeasterly striking fault, and may represent a shear
m associated within the geological contact.
Conductors 2 and 3 are two short northwesterly conductors
which lie along the presumed contact between the northeasterly
l striking metasediments to the north and the metavolcanlcs to thelr. south.
lB Conductor 4 comprises two short northwest striking
conductors. Its position overlies the shores of a small lake,
- and it is probably the result of lake-shore effect.
1'
Conductor 5 is a very prominent, northwesterly striking;(!;, ! :
conductor located along the western boundary of the north claim
*B block. It lies within the presumed northeasterly striking
I metavolcanics band with minor metasediraents, and may be the
result of a shear.
il ll l
l
l l
ii
-13-
Conductor 6 is a northwesterly striking conductor located in
the southwestern portion of the north claim block. It is roughly
located along the presumed geological contact between the
raetasediments to the north and the metavolcanics to the south,
and may represent a shear zone.
Conductor 7 is comprised of three short northwesterly
trending conductors located in the western part of the north
claim block. It overlies the northern shoulder of the magnetic
high, and it may be the result of a shear within the
metasediment/metavolcanic geological contact.
Conductor 8 is a northwesterly trending conductor located
within the presumed metavolcanic unit with some metasediments.
It overlies the south shoulder of a strong magnetic anomaly, and
its strength may be due to a shear zone.
South Claim Block
Conductor 9 is a short northwesterly striking conductor
l located in the northern part of the south claim block. It
overlies the shoulder of a strong magnetic anomaly, and lies
along the north shore of a small lake. Its location and strength
are probably the result of lake shore effect.
-14-
Conductors 10, 11 and 12 are three subparallel northwest to
north-westerly striking conductors all overlying a lake in the
south central part of the claim blockt All 3 conductors arei1
. probably caused by lake-shore effect.l Conductor 13 is a short northwesterly striking conductor
I located along the southern boundary of the south claim block. It
f overlies a very small pond and could be caused by changes in
topographic relief.,. if',-.
Conductor 14 is a strong northwesterly striking conductor
located along the southwestern boundary of the south claim block.it
~l It overlies a strong magnetic anomaly and also a small lake. It
iPl
i
ii
may be the result of a shear within the presumed north-
northeasterly trending fault or due to lake shore effect.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
The combined airborne magnetic and VLF-electromagnetic
M survey was successful in helping outline the underlying geology
" and in defining 14 conductive zones on or very near the
boundaries of the property of Mr. Wayne McChristie. The
-15-
m structural and lithologic complexity of the property as indicated
by the magnetic data suggests that the claims are located in a
l good geologic environment for gold and/or base metal
mineralization.
lm Further work is warranted on the property especially in the
•M areas of the possible bedrock conductors. An exploration programl
of ground geophysics and geological mapping should be completed.
A combined vertical gradient/total field magnetic survey and
horizontal loop electromagnetic should be performed, followed by
an induced polarization survey over selected conductors.j!
B Potentially interesting geological targets and geophysical
anomalies should then be tested by diamond drilling.
i
i i
ifii,imm
-16-
l
l
i i
Respectfully submitted,
H. FERDERBER GEOPHYSICS LTD,
•mii— Lisa L. Ahern, B.Se.
' Geologist.
l
l
l
l
il ll
APPENDIX l - CLAIM LISTSir.
B,
i
l
iiPiiii"II
1piiP
TB 965151
965152
965153
965154
965155
965156
965157
965158
965159
965160
965161
965162
965163
965164
965165
965166
965167
965168
965169
965170
965171
965172
965173
965174
965175
965176
TB 965177
965178
965179
965180
965182
965183
965184
965851
965852
965853
965854
965855
965856
965857
965858
974012
974013
974014
974015
974016
974017
974018
974019
974020
974021
974022
TB 974023
974024
974025
974026
974027
974051
974052
974053
974054
974055
974056
974057
974058
974059
974060
974061
974062
974063
1011974
1011975
1011976
1011977
1011978
1011979
1011980
Ministry of.Northern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Report of Work
Gr:och'.-T'.'ca' and Expend'''i
52BieSE8883 2.11238 BURCHELL LAKE900
Type o' S,.-vey!s) .11230 .:Prospocto''s Licence N e.
. ..l H ..u'vcs ve :.d-:v
....Da:* o f S.i'vty (from S !Oi a: Vili't o* lin,- C .
.Author (Of Gec-T e- c rm : ;- -';-jV!'
Credits R equested per Each-Claim ;i mg Cioirm T raversed (List in numerical sequence!Viininp C ifHT* j :-
Prefix ^ Number ' 'j '"FO- ti'5' fu'vey:
50 d ays. ( Tli.s r.c:o6i:s !:ne culling)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each! JfeSLJ.17
FEB 16
MINING LANDS SECTION
Mole S : -- -- rrcv ir-: T ; '. ;:o no: if;:'-,
t.orn? S u'V- vi
ocitu'fis ' excludes,
numh*r of oxning fSTj' co?5'BO by this
Tota' Day* C redits may no. Enter number o' o e y s. c
umn a t f ight. ci*. ays C 1 . Date R ecorded
Date
^v *\-QZCertilication Vetifying Repon of V\oft.
certify that l have 3 perio or witnessed same dunng and O
rt of Work ennexeSTfcreto, having performed tt
Ha r H Ci '
Mimsuy o! Repott of Work1 Northern Development
and Mines i Geoohys'ca'. Geo'oijic.fi
Ontario G t'OC'.iismicc!- ;i'io Evnsn
Type O"
'tflV typf-flii print.
space on ihis fo'rr.. at On y dflys credits ceiCiiior,- "Expenditures" section ma^ . ir. trie "Expend. Days C'."
- Do not u5i' shaded area 1, tieifw
lO auf ocoee u* f 't. L.'CtTico No
Survey Company
Name'ai-j A rid'ess'o* Author (of Gco-jer
y
iwsicf Ufto* Survey *'O'r i :-; -- " o:;t' NVi.y, o' ''(
I/
Credits Requested per Each Claijv, lo Co' u r-,ns ai 'iySpecial F-.ov, ( .on, Gi^vTJ
ErMer 40 ciSv'S iThis includes line cutting!
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
p Claim? Tiaveised (List in numeiical sequence)__^___i
Man Day;
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
RECE1V
FE816
MINING LANDS SECTION
Note Slit* ? i '- ' ^ u"s
crcd t; c;C "b: ap
'.o A rt'O'no So'veys
Excienditures iexckides powet 5ir,pp PCO' Work Pc'*Orrne3
ot E *.penot*urft Days
Total E xpennitu-es
InstructionsTots' Days Cred-t* may lv1* aopor:io^e.' a 1 f.^e : ^
nurribor o* ciayi rredas ;.c' c ^ fi i-L in columns ai ' ight.
Airbo.-nj
"cXj,.
^cv O!dee Use- Only.'o-.*' r^vi 6..O{H- Rscoroed
L^i Q̂ jMCertification Verifying Repon of Work __ _ _ ^
l hereby certify thai l have a personal and :";im,vi- ki c .viv.igi- 01 the '^cti K;t 'c/'r. - n the or witnesst'd ssme durmo ancf or iifter its cc-r.jiii t -.T. ,:rc n .c jr i t xec r.-pmt 15 true.
hf'fiMo, havmg ptrtomipd i he
me and Postal Address o*
'362 (l ..__l
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Technical Data Statement
File-
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survcy(s) Airborne o and VT.P— F.I
Township or Area Moss and BurchelJ. Lakes -— Claim Holder(s) W. McChristie, D. Petrinka
Ferderber Geophysics Ltd.Survey Company^Author of Report L- AhernAddress of A,.tW 169 Perreault Ave
Covering Dates of Survey.. Jan
Val d'Or, Que .
.. 198(linccuttmg to office) Total Miles of T.ine^&ifc f 1 nwn 149 , 9 -————
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer.™—Radiometric———Other——————.
DAYS per claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurvcyi)
Wzgnetnmettr 4 Q FflTtr"r"agnctip 4 Q Radinn)ftrJC _____(enter dayi per claim)
74 SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix)[see
(number)
TOTAL CLAIMS 77
SELF POTENTIALInstrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method___________',—————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC Instrument.——.Values measured.Energy windows (levels)Height of instrument____:________________________Background Count. Size of detector_________________________________________Overburden ______________________________________^——-.
(type, depth — Indude outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——-———————-————.—————Instrument -—.————-—-—..————.————.——. Accuracy-———.—\—--——-—.————..—..—..—Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of siirvey(s) Airborne Maqnfii-irInstrume'nt(s) G EM GSM-11 Herz Totftm 2 A
(ipecify for each type of lurvey)Accuracy..:____0.04 gamma ^nd
(specify for each type of survey)Aircraft n**H Cessna 172——-————--—^-——-^—SensoraltitnHp 300 feetNavigation and flight path recovery mpfrmH Maxr-i gq-M r.n ^as yjeual on airphoto mopaicn. Flight
path recovery was obt:a.inF!f3 wit-h a RTR rnlnnr ^r^ A em namera Panasonic Colour Aircra'ft altitude——300 fppt______________________Line Sparing 323 feet_____Miles flown over total ar^a 1 4 Q . Q_________________Over claims only 77.31
\APPENDIX l - CLAIM LIST
TB 965151
965152
965153
965154
965155
965156
965157
965158
965159
965160
965161
965162
965163
965164
965165
965166
965167
965168
965169
965170
965171
965172
965173
965174
965175
965176
TB 965177
965178
965179
965180
965182
965183
965184
965851
965852
965853
965854
965855
965856
965857
965858
974012
974013
974014
974015
974016
974017
974018
974019
974020
974021
974022
TB 974023
974024
974025
974026
974027
974051
974052
974053
974054
974055
974056
974057
974058
974059
974060
974061
974062
974063
1011974
1011975
1011976
1011977
1011978
1011979
1011980
90 0 30'
/Vr '
AMESREFER TO TWR PLAN S-642
##^g
WVt&Mlv altitf
^jKi^tLM?^^wO'M,0 ^tZ&J. J ^J.———
-*-K 65 Q
82890^8*962868:,^1^ **r*rfa* mm
- \ j*tfOC rt " -*-*i l .^^^.fi- - *T* i jJ
r^
MOSS TWPREFER TO TWP PLAN G - 676
sstfrftfy-V'vf ',,i^Wa?*^, j -'!
Nelson Lake Area (G-745)52B10SE00B3 2.11233 BURCHELL LAKE
REFERENCESfor stctur-of (slonds In Upp*r Sh*bondo**eft Lake refer to M.N.R. records,
Areas withdrawn from stoking rf ttw Minify Act:
File
(P,* SFC S-
^ ̂V ^ l
dUN lPM
LEGEND
HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No.
OTHER ROADS
TRAILS
SURVEYED LINES: -
. TOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC.
, LOTS. MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, C TO.
UNSUHVEYED LINES: v .LOT-LINES * -
PARCEL BOUNDARY
MINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY ' "*
UTILITY LINES
NON-PERENN1AL STREAM ,, "
FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS
SUBDIVISION O R COMPOSITE PLAN
RESERVATIONS . . '" '
ORIGINAL SHOREl INE *" ' .
MARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES - "*
TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PATENT, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS..'
" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.
; MINING RIGHTS ONLY .
LEASE, SURFACE 8. MINING RIGHTS....... ..-....
" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLf
" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY..
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .....
ORDER-IN-COUNCIL ^,....
RESERVATION ._....................^_.^....^..
CANCELLED __......,.___.—........... fc......—..SAND 8. GRAVEL w,....................m_.... ..
NOTE: M INING RIGHTS IN P ARCELS PATCNTtD PHK)A TO WAY 6. 1913. VESTED IN O RIGINAL PATENT** *T TMS PUBLIC LANDS ACT. K S.O 19MJ, CHAP. 3BO. M C. VI, BUOTCC 1.
SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS
FEETO 1OOO 7OOO *OOO 6000
O 700 METRES
10OO(l *M1
AREA
URCHELLLARE,O
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
THUNDER BAYMINING DIVISION
THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
THUNDER BAY
MinistryofNatural Man*o*m*nt Resources Branch
Ontario
Dlti OCTOBER 1982
485903G-70
•#- *s
"f
ra Q
n o m w
NO
HT
H
AS
TR
ON
OM
IC
TIL
LY
L
AK
E G
-56
2
^
BU
RC
HE
LL
L
AK
E
-
2 H
z '•at rj to
o 3Z
ic*
z? 05 s; M
HO
I
OD
> ^
30
O
O w
w
rn
LEGENDTOTAL FIELD CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 GAMMAs
FIDUCIAL POINT
LINE DIRECTION
BASE VALUE 59000 GAMMAS
MAGNETIC LOW1000 GAMMAS
100 GAMMAS
25 GAMMAS
3 UK'.: H t. i
AIRBORNE MAGNETIC SURVEY
LEGENDTOTAL FIELD CONTOUR INTERVALCONDUCTOR AXISFIDUCIAL POINTLINE DIRECTIONSTATION USED: SEATTLE,WASHINGTON,U.GAINL.KLESS THAN ZERO
AIRBORNE VLF-EM SURVEY