REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …
Transcript of REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …
o
4 REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB
for MOTION
Marshsil J-pi
INTRODUCTION41P03NW8016 2 .737 MARSHAY 010
Matron Exploration Limited holds under opvum claims nurtured 322999 to 323001 inclusive and 323332 to 323331* inclusive situated in tits northwest corner of Marshay Twp., Sudbury Mining District, Ontario* Aa additional six, adjacent and contiguous unpatented mining claim* numbered 317376 to 33.7381 inclusive are owned by Matron.
Aooess to the property Is available by C.N.R. which Iles at the east boundary of the property at a point UB idles north of Sudbury, Out* The property can also be readied by a good lumber road leading south fro* Shiningtree, Ontario, for a distance of \6 ndles.
Hap references of this area include O.D.M. Map P 300, Westree Sheet, which shows this area as undifferentiated silicic Intrusive rooks of Algoman age, and Aeromagnetic Map ll&l O, which features a N 1^*W magnetic trend traversing the property which probably represents a diabase dike* A search of the assessment files at Sudbury produced meagre information*
SURVEY METHODS
A systematic grid of lines was out from an east-west base line centrally located on the property* North-south picket lines were cut at IjQO* Intervals with sons additional lines at 200* Intervals In the central part of the property* total mileage of the system was 10.67 miles* Claim 323001 was excluded from the surveys*
The grid system was used to conduct a magnetometer survey using a Sharpe HP - l fluxgate instrument* A VU? - KM survey was conducted using a Ronka KM 16 instrument and Cutler, Maine as the transmitting source. An Induced Polarisation survey was conducted by Seigel Associates Ltd. under contract and the results of this survey appear in another report. The property was geologically napped by the writer of this report. AU of this work was carried out during Sspteitoer and October, 1971*
THEORY OF THE EM SURVEY METHOD
aajment is sinply a sensatlve receiver unit which detects radio
7 Ions operating for ooraaunioations with submarines
these stations In the world end the selection of the one touse depends upon its orientation* The direction to the station that is most closely aligned to the general trend of the country rocks Is usually the factor considered. The stations have vertical antenna and as a result trsiusdt a concentric field around them. Any conductive body lying In this field will create a secondary field*
The receiver unit contains a crystal of the saws frequency as the transmitting source and a means of measuring the vertical field components. It has two Inputs with two receiving coils built into the instrument. One coil has a normally vertical axis and the other is horizontal.
t The signal from one of the coils (vertical axis) is first ndniffdsed lay tilting the coil* The tilt-angle is calibrated in percentages and degrees* The remaining signal in this coil is finally balanced out by a measured percentage of a signal from the other coil, after being shifted by 900* The axis of this coil is at right angles to the axis of the first coil* This coil is kept normally parallel to the primary field*
Thus, if the secondary signals are small ooBpared to the primary horizontal field, the mechanical tilt-angle is an accurate measurement of the Yertical real-ooraponenl and the compensation i r/2 - signal from the horizontal coil is a measurement of the quadrature vertical signal*
RESULTS OF THE SUHVETS
The property is approximately 85/5 covered by overburden* The rocks observed consist mainly of granodiorite intruded by east-nest and north-south trending diabase dikes* Hear the north boundary of the property and centrally located are two narrow altered basic rocks termed as diorite* They trend east-vest and dip -k5o south and are sheard along strike and contain minor pyrite* A grab sample of this material assayed tr* Au, O.Ob Ag, 0.0# Ou, 0*01? ft. (Une O, 1100* H).
In the central part of the property old pits were located union contained illite quarts stringers and veins which -were barren of metallic mintxals. At this location the garnodiorite was homogeneously peppered with chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite up to 1/8" size. A grab sample of this material assayed 1.3&C Cu, 0*02* Ml* This is situated in a low swarapy area* (line 8 W, 1000' S)* (
On Jim O, 1800* S, rusty sheared basic rooks contain minor pyrite and is likely a contact zone of a diabase dike*
The results of the magnetic survey confirmed the presence of diabase dikes and outlined other possible dikes* No magnetic indications wtre obsefved over the pits containing pyrrhotite, and no other special features were observed*
The results of the VLF * EM survey showed only one minor valid conductor located on the north end of lines O, IjB, 88, and near the pyriUetd diorite band* The disturbance along the creek in the central part of property is due to overburdenaffects* i
j SUMMAfff AMD CONCLUSIONS !
i
Material from the pits located in the central part of the property was significantly interesting for copper possibilities* The nature of the mineralisation is such that Induced Polarisation methods should detect it* Ho particular features were j outlined using magnatonster and VII1 ** EM methods* ;
Respectfully submitted,
New liskeard, Qnt. NOV. U,1071. J.o*tfillart B.A,Sc7|P.Bng,
~t^--
.CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that i
1. l an a graduate in Mining Geology from the University of Toronto in 1951* and Z hold the degree of Bachelor of Applied Science and I have been practising ay profession continuously for the past twenty years*
2* I aa a member in good standing of fhe Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario* and I reside and hold office at 12? Lakeshore Road, New Liskeard, Ontario*
3. tfy report is based on personal supervision of the field work during the nonths of Septesfoar and October, 1971, and personal examination of the geology of the property and of the results of the investigations*
Signed i
New liskeard, Pnt. Nor* Iijl971,
DEC 2 s
41P03NW0016 2 .737 MARSHAY 020
rREPORT ON
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY MARSHAY TWP. ONTARIO
ON BEHALF OF METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED
L .J
by
James M. Haynes, B. Se. ,D.I. C. , Geophysicist
Jan Klein, M.Se., P. Eng. , Geophysicist
TORONTO, Ontario October, 1971
SUMMARY
The induced polarization survey carried out in the Marshay Twp.
grid has revealed one anomalous zone of up to at least 1600 feet in length
but open to both sides. This zone (marked C) might reflect l^o sulphides
by volume .
It is recommended that detailed geological mapping and sampling
be executed prior to drilling of this zone.
REPORT ON INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY Marshay Twp. Ontario
on Behalf of METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED
INTRODUCTIONtt
Between September 21st and October 3rd, 1971. an induced polarization
survey was conducted on a property in Marshay Twp. , northern Ontario,
under the direction of Mr. J.M. Haynes, B.Se. D.I. C., of Seigel Associates
Limited on behalf of Metrori Exploration Limited.
The property, comprised of claims 317376, 317377, 317378, 317379,
317380, 317381, 323000, 323001, 323322, 323333, 323334, 323999 is located
approximately 68 miles north of Sudbury adjacent to the C.N.R. main line
and 2 miles west of Shoofly Lake. Access was by vehicle from New Liskeard
and by a logging road to the old Lapalmes Spur. A location map is included
on Plate l . The survey was completed over a precut grid consisting of 20
north-south traverse lines. The sections surveyed on each line are indicated
on Plate 1. A total of approximately 8.0 line miles of profiles were obtained.
The three electrode array configuration was used throughout the survey,
employing a 200' electrode spacing, and traverse lines were run north and
south from the base line. On all lines the current electrode followed the
potential electrodes although on sections north of the base line, the current
electrode was to the south of the potential electrodes and on sections south of
the base line the current electrode was placed north of the potential electrodes
j The western half of the grid was completed first with the "infinite" current
5M--
4M--
MARSHAY
M. 855
FIGURE
LOCATION MAP
METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED
MARSHAY TOWNSHIP , ONTARIO
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
SCALE : r a 1/2 MILE
4IP3 71-9507
electrode placed at 10E on the base line. Since transmitter current was low
(but sufficient, averaging about 0.3 amperes), the "infinite" was moved to 2E
when line 10W was completed. On the eastern half of the grid the "infinite"
was placed at 10W until line 12E was completed and was then shifted to line
2W. At all times the "infinite 1 ! was greater than 5a away from the traverse
lines being surveyed ("a" being the separation distance between line electrodes,
a ^ 2 00').
The purpose of this survey was to detect and map the distribution of
subsurface metallic mineralization, in particular cupriferous sulphides, which
may exist in the vicinity of the lines traversed.
The survey was performed with a Scjntrea^Mark VII time dgmain
(pulse type) induced polarization unit. This equipment consists of a Newmont
type remotely triggered receiver and a 2. 5 k W transmitter operating with a
current-on time of two seconds and current-off time of two seconds. The
system measures the apparent resistivity of the ground in ohm-meters and
two parameters of the overvoltage pulse shape. The chargeability, M,
measured in milliseconds, is the normalized integral of the transient voltage
between 0.45 seconds and 1.1 seconds after current cut-off. The 0.45
second delay time allows most electromagnetic induction transients, switch
ing transients and interline coupling effects to disappear before measurements
i* are made. The area over the transient curve, taking as a reference the
transient voltage at 0.45 seconds after current cut-off, is also measured.
This measurement is made during the. period 0. 45 seconds to 1.75 seconds
after current cut-off and is expressed as the quantity, L. Like M, L is
measured directly in milliseconds at the receiver. A number of consecutive
integrations of both L and M are measured and the average values used so as
to reduce telluric noise effects and other interference.
The ratio L/M may be considered a sensitive indication of the transient
curve shape. It has been well established that the L/M ratios measured in
areas of no metallic mineralization are constant within better than 20^o.
Significant departures from this range usually imply an abnormal condition,
either an anomalous metallic polarization response, or significant electro
magnetic or interline coupling.
For further references on the Induced Polarization technique and case
histories, refer to the attached copies of articles by Dr. H.O. Seigel
entitled: "Some Comparative Geophysical Case Histories of Base Metal
Discoveries" and "The Induced Polarization Method".
GEOLOGY
The geology of the project area is not known in detail at the time of
writing this report. Regionally, however, the area i s underlain by early
Precambrian undifferentiated felsic intrusives as illustrated by the Sudbury-
Cobalt, Geological Compilation Series Sheet #2188. Unfortunately even this
regional geology sheet is very limited in the Marshay Twp. area, although
one geological lineation is postulated striking Nl 5OW through the project area.
This lineation is further borne out by the aero magnetic sheet, as a 300 gamm
anomaly is present on the property in an area otherwise quite magnetically
flat. This anomaly may be due to a diabase dike, as indications of this have
been noted within the survey grid while the survey was being executed.
The regional aero magnetics seem to reflect felsic intrusives in the west, in
which the magnetic anomaly is an outstanding feature, and a complex of
sediments, metamorphics and mafics in the east. The contact of these two
areas strikes approximately N30 W. Within the project area, several shallow
pits have been dug in the past; although one located on line 8W about station
10S is of particular interest. One sample taken from this pit shows cupri
ferous sulphides containing chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite in a quartz-monzonite
host rock,
PRESENTATION OF DATA
Plate l shows the results of the three electrode array profiles on a
scale of l" = 200' and contours on a scale of l" = 400'. The contour interval
is one millisecond. Apparent resistivity, chargeability and the L/M ratio
are shown for each line. The chargeability results are plotted on a vertical
scale of l " ^ 5 milliseconds and resistivity values are plotted on a logarithmic
scale for which 1. 33" = a factor of 10. The datum level is 1000 ohm-meters
except for lines indicated otherwise. The L/M ratio is plotted on a vertical
scale of l" s l unit.v
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
By virtue of the fact that the property was surveyed from the base line
and due to the positioning of the current electrode on lines running both north
and south of the base line, station O was read twice. In some cases a dif
ference between these two readings can be noted, but no appreciable change
of curve shape results. (This discrepency for station O has no bearing on
the results of the entire north south sections as a whole. )
From the chargeability contour plan the property may be divided
roughly into at least three zones. Zone C in the south comprises a high on
lines 20W to 0+00, south of sta.tion 14S. Zone B comprises two blocks, the
western one approximately bordered by lines 24W and 10W and stations 0+00
and 14S, the eastern block by lines 4W and l 2E and again stations 0+00 and
14S. The remainder of the grid can be identified as Zone A.
The resistivity of the project area on the whole is high, averaging
approximately 10,000 ohmmeters ranging between extremes of 300 to
100,000 ohmmeters. On all profile lines the chargeability curves follow the
resistivity curves (high chargeability, high resistivity). This is an excellent
indication that the three electrode array separation of ZOO 1 was successful in
giving responses indicative of basement rock material. The depth of pene
tration for this survey is therefore believed to be quite adequate.
Zone B is a complex zone, and is fairly indicative of background charge
ability levels, 4-6 milliseconds. An area running in the vicinity of lines 6W
and 8W is well below these levels but probably reflects deeper overburden and
marshy conditions. This depression divides Zone B in an east and west
portion. A small anomaly about 2 milliseconds above background is present
in the area of L8E station 4S. No steep chargeability gradients are present
in this zone. The resistivity profiles show no significant increases in bedrock
conductivity and are generally above 10,000 ohmmeters. Lines 6W and 8W are
the two exceptions with resistivity values much lower, averaging about 5000
f b
4 ohmmeters, A pit on line 8W near station 1 45 c ontaining mineralized rock
specimens is in a region of low resistivity and chargeability. Tests com
pleted on a mineralized sample taken from this pit indicated extremely high
chargeability readings and extreme conductivity. Although these tests are
not representative of results that would be expected from the same in situ#
deposits, they were high enough to show that any sulphides if in quantity
would certainly have given verifiable anomalous results.
Zone A is characterised by low chargeability values (below background
level). No steep gradients are present on the contour plan, and the zone is
relatively flat. Resistivity values from the profiles are fairly stable, with
no significant drops in value on any traverse line to warrant interest with
regards to subsurface sulphides. A gradual decrease in chargeability and
resistivity values can be observed in an easterly direction towards Poukiz
Lake. Coupled with this are contour depressions on lines 8W and 4E and i/
areas adjacent to the lake. This may possibly reflect a deepening of over
burden sediments towards the lake and in the region of creeks which flow
through the marshy ground situated in this zone. The L/M ratios are fairly
normal but for slight changes at 6N on lines 8W, (HOO,4E and 8E, also at 8N
on line 12E. This situation is indicative of a short time constant in the
transient decay curve and may be c ased by positive E.M. effects or small
particle size. The latter reason is more probably the cause, due to the fine
marsh deposits.
Zone C is an east-west striking linear high. This zone is at least 1000
feet long, but open to both sides. This zone displays above background charge-
T r
abilities as high as 7 milliseconds. Sharp gradients are illustrated by the
contour plan. Again resistivity values increase where chargeability increases.
Resistivities in the zone are generally well above 10,000 ohmmeters. If
mineralization of a massive nature were present in quantity, the situation
should be reflected most likely, by a resistivity depression. The anomalous
chargeability values possibly reflect a change in rock type from area B, but
does not exclude the possibility of sulphide mineralization (up to l "?o by volume),
A single station anomaly at L4W station ION should bft mentioned without
further evaluation. 7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The survey area can be divided into two main areas. The first area
north ol station 14S comprises Zones A and B. Both are suggested to be
underlain by -the same rock type with a chargeability level of 4-6 milliseconds
and apparent resistivities between 20,000 and 50,000 ohmmeters. Minor
anomalies (L4W station ION; L8E station 2S) can be caused by small uneco
nomic amounts of sulphides. Zone B represents areas with a thin cover of
overburden while Zone A more or less coincides with the topographically
lower parts of.the area. It is, in other words, underlain by increasing
amounts of overburden and swamp cover, reducing the bedrock response.
The areas near old prospecting pits did not give anomalous responses, sug
gesting that the amount of sulphides must be of a very localised nature.
The chargeabilities in Zone C are generally well above the background
values of Zones A and B, reflecting an anomaly striking approximately east-
west across lines 16W to 4W about station 18S, It is recommended that
detailed geologic work be done over this zone which might contain up to l^o
sulphides by volume, and possibly trenching with samples being taken for
assey. No drill sites can be recommended at this time on the geophysical
data alone. Future recommendations are dependent on the results of them
sampling and geologic programs.
Respectfully submitted,
James M. Haynes, B.Se. , D.I. C. , Geophysicist.
Jan KleiA, T^.Sc. , P. Eng. , GeophysAcisl
41P03NW8816 2 .727 MARSHAY
GEOPHYSICAL —TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
300
KtCEIVED
OFFICE USE ONLY |
TOPE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT l FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT 1 1 PROJECTS
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. J SECTION
Type of Snrvpy }hduced Polarization'* ,. ' Marshay Twp.. Sudbury lining Divtsion t
Tnwnship nr Are* ' ^
Claim hoMer(s) ^QtrOP Exploration Limited te^f2302 - liOl fey St. Xronto, Qnt. .
Anthnrnf ttepnrt J.M.H4ynefi fi J. Klein (SeintwMr). ,, '222 Snidercroft Rd* Concord, Qnt*AHHress ' * ?
rnyerjng n^ff? "f s^r-yey 3ftpt. 21 — oct. 3 j 1971*(linccutting to office)
Total Miles of Line nit ,, ...., 10*6?
SPECIAL PROVISION? r^vs ! jSlCREDITS REQUESTED ^r^,^ pcrdaim
—F.WtrnmagnprirENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first Magnetometer ———————survey — RfHinmpTr"'' ™. , ———ENTER 20 days for each -Other I*P* ^ ,,,,additional survey using n^lngi^Isame grid. " . Gp^""npmira'. ,, ,,,,,,,, _ ,..,. ..— .....^ '
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
MagrtPt"mptpr ..Fl^tr"r"apnpt'f ,,,.. Rariiomfttrjr(enter days per claim)
PATF,: Dec.1^,1971* STHNFATIIRF.? \̂( ^4^^^^y' Author of Report " "*"*^
PROJECTS SECTIONRes C,pn\. SujotfMAflU Oiialifif-atinns \M^
Prfvi^MS Survpys f̂ ffj "
nhprkf-H hy Hatp
r.F.nT.nr,TrAT. HRANr.H
ApproyfH hy datp ——————— m
r.pnr nmr A T RR A wrn ,
Approved hv Aat~
" \ ; ~ - ' ' ' i. '
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
••••-''"r *MXlbiprtfix) ; -. -(ittiBiber) '
,. -V,,,. : r^^:^^^^;.,:/- . , ; .-^^•SpK^SMviw1 '^^--'-^'*'^f'|||'^'^"'^"'^i'^*'"'""/. " "••" : ' '.:-v ^iS'L-.^-r^';':^*'^^ .-. '-. - !
•:''\-; ; ^lAr: v---:. 3l73St...:,'. ; i i
^ L: i 322999 ;/;,.-.-: 1•-, - - - - - . - . - - ' f
V:^f.:': '\ : ;vt32W).-;^-'- |:--:-.y?i^,;^fe-;\- . . -1
"-1 .' si^-y^. sjj^ :". .-- r "."i. " '- - jJt Jjj5 33 """' . j . ". " i i*t•"t-~ •~- '-"^' - :" -V-'"". ™-*^ *^r ," " . ' S
1 ' ; -- i-iU'-"r i . ^' ;: - : . ; " -- ;. - : ' ,; " ; . i
,...- . .- -. . . - - i
' . , , - -t;: . .. ,, . ^ ,- - ,,-;.";- . . . ; -
'l 4 :
v; -S^ :;r-:5J : /-'. -.'... .-•..,- -- -.-'
TOT AI i:iCI',AlMf?' -- •"-" - - ^f 11" " :' r ; "
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATAi \ ' "' ' - - -'
GROUND SURVEYS
Number of Stations__________——————;————Nnmh*r of 1'" ;r: :^Station interval________100'T . . , St 200' Line spacingProfile scale or Contour intervals____________B ?'*T! I*ftpoa*l
(ipecify for each typp of lurvey) MAGNETIC
Instrument.Accuracy -Scale constant— Diurnal correction method. Base station location———
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument.Coil configuration. Coil separation^^Accuracy—^——..—Method: D Fixed transmitter C] Shoot back Q Inline : * C3 ParallellineFrequency^^———^^^^—f———^^^^.
(specify V.L.F. lUtlon)Parameters measured. GRAVITY
Instrument.Scale constant.
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy—-—————^————————^———. INDUCED POLARIZATION -f RESISTIVITY
Instrument___________Scintrex Mark Vll
Time domain————————————————x———————— Frequency domain.Frequency___________________________ Range—m————~m Power—————————————————————g,g foy———————————————— -2LElectrode array.
spacing. Type of electrode,
^fi1'-:".--;-
GEOPHYSICAL -'TECHNICAL DATA
: ,.'-*? -
stiips.2:-:iV';;:iS;t- h-itisr
TO JJE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT SE
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN tNTERPl
.,, ...,,.... ...-J, . . ,,,,,,^,.J ^J-^.-,itJi,.,.:I - T.,.,^^^y^gPJgg .,,
?|J35i^K6HflJ|
Type of Si.rvoy VU - EM| fS ̂ KEshi ̂ '"li^'f^l^^t^^^^Sl^^l^^ ̂ "* i";fi. : .-.: :-:,-i-.r-.::i ,.,.*'^^^^^-- .:^^^^^&^^^^:M:*..! -• f!^-, -t; -:--v . k r"- , i
Township or ArPa Marshay T|Hp. f Sudbury .iClaim h^lH <.r/c^ - Matron Exploration Mmitad- **OVJL wu. ***fcpj.vj. qrVj.yA^ *4x**ju. v^y^i ^,:JjT ;.lJA::ra!rif.T' j js''t
2302 - IjOj. Bay St., Toronto, 9e^^^^^^
J.Q.WLlLara feAuthor of ReportAddress____Stay 596 MHtf LISKEAJtD.
Covering Dates of Survey-
Total Miles of Line cut—
Sept.(linecutting to office)
10.67
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer--*—Radiometric———Other—————-
DAYSper claim
30 ii
Geological.Geochemical.
S* -r^.7; k:-7'
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision crediti do not apply to airborne lurveyi) S3.
Magnetometer. .Electroinagnetic. . Radiometric(enter day* per claim)
SIGNATURE:
PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol.,.—-.....— Qualifications.Previous Surveys
Checked by. .date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved by- .date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved by. .date.
.''"
^^^•^Sfjy^jt^^n^j^^^^^tt^is^' Mi^f ":; ''^1^11^^5^^ife?^^ff f ̂ ^l^^tS^^1 " S^
' }k'"Lr!*i'^'3.fi:iaisqp*:S|S5:K?l*3SjsigSM - -*1 3^'- "*.*^-' ! rOKI 1111K H Kjntl' lit M limJwA^^ljiil 111 (J 111111111M111
^iW^roiii!*i^^ 4^^^^^^^^^'(^*^^ ?V.VVrO r - - 4'
.l!iW^lll^lg^f4M ' * "P-(
yi.jifL ^-^-•fc±^.|k-^-i;i^^^: |1^i'"-?^5l-^;i: 7^^ --v :r, :i.i.: -i'Jfv^" ,.? - --i ' ' !i'-^K^.- ^V^^'fl^f*"^^^^ :--^:'' ^---- ~ !
; 'BffM.; - . s . . - . . - -.. 5^. , ; . . ,: ;- -. i
t jip^Xi S-f^liiji'M^ii!!^^
'^-^^^yjjtii^^Sj^fij^^
i
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS
Number of Stations ______________ 'a 35* -—————— ———— Number of Readings ___ 5*351 (Y) l
Station interval ————— —— _______________________ ' ' ————————— . ———-
Line spacing _________ IjOO ' fr 200 * ___________________ '-Profile scale or Contour interval* DiP Idfe- V^O" ^d quadrature lg-
(ipecify for each type of iurvey) ; .
MAGNETIC , - , . . .
Instrument ________________________________ : ——-....—^^--————————Accuracy - Scale constant ———————————————— I ——— '. —————— !Diurnal correction method __________________________ . ———————-———Base station location ——--—-—----———--^^^^———^-^--—--—.^^^.^—^^^^^^.—^-------^---
ELECTROMAGNETIC, t Ronka E M 16 InstrumentCoil configurationCoil separation ---——.——.---——...—....---——-—.—-^Accuracy —..^.^..^..^.——-———^-^.—.—^-....^-—^.^.—.—
Method: (H9 Fixed transmitter EH Shoot back CD Inline d Parallel lineFrequency ________ ̂ ntler. ^ine ____ 17.6
(ipecify V.L.F. tUtion)
Parameters measured ——-—————-^—^-——-——————-————-GRAVITY
Instrument.Scale constant.
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy———————————————INDUCED POLARIZATION RESISTIVITY
Instrument—-—-—--————-———-————————Time domain——————————————————————————— Frequency domain. Frequency_______________________________ Range——^^.^^^^.Power~.^^—--------^--^^-——-—-————-—---——-——.^^—-———-—---.^-——Electrode array—— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode.
File.
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
DEC 2 8TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT
FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
I97J
Type of Survey. Magnetometer
OFFICE USE ONLY J
^, . , ', , , , Metron Exploration Limited # 2571 .laim hnlrlpr(Kj
AnthnrnfKppnrt J.O.WLnaTS Box596
AHHrpss NQIT Lickaard ^t*Oaring fWpc of Snrwy Sept. li - 28,1971.
(linecutting to office)
TWalMilocMf T.inPriit 10.67
SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED r.^,.;,., P" **
li if*/^! vrttTi ci om f*t i ^*
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first -Magnetometer ———— hQ ——
7
ENTER 20 days for each -Otheradditional survey using Ornlnpiralsame grid.
Ocnrhernical.. ,,,..,.,.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
MagPPtnrnpter ..filpotrnmaprnetir RaHinmetrir(enter days per claim) ^^
l/ Author of Report ^"^^~--
PROJECTS SECTIONRes Gpnl Onulifirations
Prpvinnc Surveys
rhprkpH hy rlatp
OF.OT.nnir:Ai.KUANnn
Apprnvpd hy dat(-
r.RnTnnirAT.RWAMrn
AnnrovpH hv d uff*
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
S jff O Jit) *in rt *\rjH jfjj&flssc 3-'-73/^(prefix) (number)
s 317378s 31737?S 317350
S 317381 .... ..
S S22599
^ J23332S 323333
S 32333k
TOTAT,n,AIMS -11
S
M*T
JM
tt
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVF.Y?
Number of Stations ___________ - _________________ Number of Readings Station interval _______________ IQQtLine spacing _____________________ k00 ' and 200'Profile scale or Contour intervals____________200 L~——
{specify for each type of survey)MAGNETIC
Instrument _______________Sharpe M F - l fluxgate
Accuracy - Scale constantDiurnal correction method____hourly
RT T9 E Base station location-————-J!——————
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument.Coil configuration. Coil separation —— Accuracy————Method: CU Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back C! Inline EH Parallel line
Frequency-^-—-^—^-^^——^-—^—-—-.—.—————^.————-—-—————-——.———.—.^^^^^^—^(specify V.L.F. station)
measured ————————————————————————————————
Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
ri^J lZATiQN RESISTIVITY
Instrument.
Time domain___________________________ Frequency domain.
Frequency_______________________________ Range^^^—.^^^Power.—^^—.^^^^^—^^^^^-^^—^-—-————————.——————-————
Electrode array-— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode .
OFFICE USE ONLY
File.
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
RECEIVED
DEC 2 B 1 971PROJECTS SECTION
Type of Survey. Geology
PivisioiTownship or ^ rp!iM-..rchay Tup,. Sudbury Claim holder(s)____Metron E:xp3.oration Idmited____T2j?7
?302 - U01 Bay St.Toronto, Ont.
J.G.WillarSAuthor of Report ̂ ^————^—Address———o^-. rjo^,—Wan, T rf cVacy-H—fin*—
A-'VA.^J 7 W *1C?W AJJL OiVC7CU. CI^ VJ.1U0
Covering Dates of Survey-
Miles of Line cut —
month of October 1971.(linccutting to office)
10.6?
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
DAYSGeophysical
—Magnetometer.
—ixciciioi—Other.
20
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer_____Electromagnetic _____Radiometric ————(enter days per claim)
PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol. Qualifications.Previous Surveys
by.
. HRANr.M
Approved by. .date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved hv
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
.....S................3J.7.37.7..........,8........,......3I7.37.a....8................317.375..
.J5................317.381.
.St........S
........3229.92..323000
323332323333
323331*
TOTAL CLAIMS. /f
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEY!)
Number of Stations_____________c^r*————————————Number of Readings___f*35Station interval_____________________________ ———————————————Line spacing____________________________LOOS and 200' -————————
Profile scale or Contour intervals_______________________________________(specify for each type of survey)
MAGNETIC
Instrument .^^—^^-—-———^-^^——^^-—.———————————Accuracy - Scale constant — Diurnal correction method. Base station location-———.
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument——-———Coil configuration. Coil separation ——Accuracy——————.
Method: CH Fixed transmitter O Shoot back d Inline CD Parallel line Frequency___________________________________________________________
(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measured———————————————————————————————————————————————————— GRAVITY
Instrument.Scale constant.
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy————-—-————————— INDUCED POLARIZATION RESISTIVITY
Instrument———^——.—————-———————.
Time domain_____________________________ Frequency domain.
Frequency_____________________________ Range——————Power-—^-——-^—.^—.^—-^—.^——^—————-——-—-—————————————Electrode array——
Electrode spacing. Type of electrode,
LJ
Ul
1kJ
o i
w ^
iCO
f
-J
l
.j 7 f X
/.4/r
f v^
NV
Ja
ckpi
ne
\
' 0
0
0
J
Ul
W w -i \
i '
ii
-t-i
;
j t i i-*-
i4 i 4. f i i -f-
i
CL
2 !5s
JU OJ i: CO "-
Be
ula
h
Tw
p.
v..
...
. 5
M
\
A M
0\
( 1
x^1
j po
iL^y..
i
40*e/
,/i
— - —
-T--- T
r-trr-
-ii
' i
' y 1
\ i
! ; 3
1737
7 , 3
1737
6 3
22
99
9 i^
SO
Op, 3
2300
1 ;
^1
13173781333334
32
33
33
[ 3233^2
; i
oi —
— ]—
..-.—
-4—
-^ K
;,l III
()
Z '
"M
' i3
l7379
!3l7
38
0
1317
381 } —
— J ^
i-
i _ -i
—,.
i JU
-9 1
"i
Vf-\
"M
AR
SH
AY
TW
P.
(f^ H
IND
EX
M
AP
\
SC
ALE
--
1 IN
CH
^ 4
0
CH
AIN
S
Jack
pine
, po
plar
, bi
rch
San
d an
d
/i
O
Spr
uce,
bi
rch,
bo
pla
r
Pin
e, i
sp
ruce
,
bilr
ch.
po
pla
r
and
grav
el
LE
GE
ND
' A
X
/J'
7
Stri
ke
and
dip
of
shea
ring
Birch
, p
op
lar
Geo
logi
cal
cont
act
assu
med
GE
OLO
GY
SU
RV
EY
2 3
O O
l
ME
TRO
N
EXPL
OR
ATIO
N
LIM
ITE
DM
AR
SH
AY
T
WR
, O
NT
.
41
P0
3N
W0
01
6
2.7
27
M
AR
SH
AY
200
^ ̂
xG
. W
illors
B
.AS
c.,
PE
ng.
Oct
. 19
71
Beu
lah
Tw
p.-i^
M^.
X.A
, M
S~^
l i
Pa z
hi g
y
'T
3173
77
3173
76
3173
7BI3
2333
4
322999
'B23000'
....
j ̂71
3 E
3333
1 32
3
3I7
37
9J3
I73
80
31
7381
fl_
___J--- J-
MA
RS
HA
Y
TWP
.
3^2J
;
1:-f
t
L ^
^i J:
IND
EX
M
AP
SC
AL
E :
l IN
CH
z
40
CH
AIN
S
MA
GN
ET
IC
DA
TA
Conto
ur
inte
rval
200
gOT
imas
Norm
al
corr
ect
ion
- no
ne
nst
rum
ent
used
S
harp
e M
F-
l fU
xgate
Abo
ve
1000
gam
mas
—
re
d
Bel
ow
O
ga
mm
as
—
blue
GEO
MAG
NET
IC
SUR
VEY
MET
RO
N
EXPL
OR
ATIO
N
LIM
ITE
DM
AR
SH
AY
T
W R
, O
NT.
Sca
le :
l
200
J.
G.
Will
ars
B A
Sc.
, P
Eng
. O
ct.
1971
4IP03NW0016 2.727 MARSHAY
210
hJ
O N -t,.-
*a i' i^ i L
1
. 1- i'
l. J ] l 1 1. :
,--f'
1 .*
-i
\ t-i- r i ^ t -i
i* 1 1 1 ir-
1*
1 ^fc
' - -r
t; 7
•..'
t:
f-i
" t -f
-Zi
J,,
'V i,
4-
Be
ula
h
Tw
p.
s,M
d
l
:H
^ v f CO 5tM
l MA
RS
HA
Y
TW
P
IND
EX
M
AP
SC
ALE
^ l
INC
H -
40
C
HA
INS
-t-
323
O O
f
46
MIL
EPO
ST
T
EL
EC
TR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
D
ATA
Sta
tkxi
us
ed
Cut
ter,
M
aine
C 1
78
kH
z)
read
ings
ta
ken
faci
ng
nort
h
Dip
pr
ofile
1/50
Qua
drat
ure
prof
ile1
/50
" -
!0Xo
-
Dip
val
ues
reco
rded
to
Th
e le
ft.
Qua
drO
ture
va
lues
re
cord
ed
to
the
right
.
Neg
ativ
e va
lues
p
lotted
to
th
e le
ft.
Posi
tive
valu
es
plot
ted
to
the
right
.
Con
duct
or
axis
VL
F-E
MS
UR
VE
Y
ME
TRO
N
EXPL
OR
ATIO
N
LIM
ITE
DM
AR
SH
AY
TW
P.,
ON
T.
Sca
le :
2OC
41P
03N
W00
16
2.7
27
M
AR
SH
AY
220
G.
Will
ors
B
.A.S
c.,
pEng
. O
ct.
1971
10+OON
4-5
20+00 S
cviJ
f~ f r
Z A -
- 10+OON
0+00 BASE LINE
3-1
10+00 S
LEGEND
5 MILLISECOND CONTOUR INTERVAL
l MILLISECOND CONTOUR INTERVAL
CHARGEABILITY LOW
N
CJLd CJ
UJ00OJ
SCALE-l" = 400'
a:5H
UJ 5M--
UJxCO
4M --
I 317379 J 317380 !LL^. —_ .J
**
MARSHAY TWP.
M. 855
CLAIM AND LOCATION MAP
MARSHAY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO
SCALE- l" * 2640'
2M
N
^
CJ
41P03NW0016 2 .727 MARSHAY S30
. G
\
\ \
\
UJ CJ
10+00 S
20+00 S
LEGEND
3 ELECTRODE ARRAY
L/M r 2
10,000-1
^SSOOOHin iUJZ CO
1000 J-Olo
a - 200 FEET
UJ00 OJ
N
POTENTIAL DIPOLE TO THE S. ON SECTIONS S. OF B.L.TO THE N. ON SECTIONS N.OF B.L.
SCALE- l" = 200'
10+00 N
0+00 BASE LINE
PLATE l
METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED
MARSHAY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYSCINTREX MARK M 2.5KW UNIT
SCALE : l"- 200'
SURVEY BY SEIGEL ASSOCIATES LIMITED
SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1971
41 P3