THE HARD QUESTIONS! ANSWERED. COMMENTS - QUESTIONS - TESTIMONIES.
REMINDER: The audience is in listen-only mode Please e-mail questions via the Q&A panel box Select...
-
Upload
melvyn-harris -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of REMINDER: The audience is in listen-only mode Please e-mail questions via the Q&A panel box Select...
REMINDER:
The audience is in listen-only mode
Please e-mail questions via the Q&A panel box
Select questions will be answered during the last 10 minutes of the program
Please answer poll questions
Webex customer support at: 866-229-3239
Current state of U.S. M&A deal activity: Where are we now?
Observation of a “market practice” based on the
treatment/inclusion of key deal terms
Highlights of Schulte Roth & Zabel 2011 Private Equity Buyer/Public Target M&A Deal
Study
Highlights of Schulte Roth & Zabel 2011 Private Equity Buyer/Public Target M&A Deal
Study• For transactions with single-tier reverse termination fees
("RTFs") — the range was 5.28% to 9.43% of target equity value (mean: 6.74%; median 6.36%).
• For transactions with two-tier RTFs:
o The range for the first tier was 2.23% to 15.16% of equity value (mean: 5.73%; median 3.23%).
o The range for the higher tier was 4.46% to 37.89% (mean: 12.40%; median 7.27%).
Highlights of Schulte Roth & Zabel 2011 Private Equity Buyer/Public Target M&A Deal Study
“While ‘go-shop’ provision are not ‘market practice,’ they are widely used and not exceptions to the rule”
“While there recently have been innovations in deal terms in strategic acquisitions of U.S. public companies, these innovations have not spread to transactions involving private equity
buyers”
Highlights of Schulte Roth & Zabel 2011 Private Equity Buyer/Public Target M&A Deal Study
Macroeconomic andsocioeconomic
issues that are on the radar of dealmakers
Dealmaking Evolution Post-2008 Credit Crisis
Length of time for deals to be signed Duration of owning portfolio companies Future prospects in financing Biggest changes in deal terms