Reliability Guidelines
-
Upload
jhoana-mujica -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Reliability Guidelines
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
1/162
SEMATECHTechnology Transfer 92031014A-GEN
Guidelines for Equipment Reliability
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
2/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
3/162
Guidelines for Equipment ReliabilityTechnology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
SEMATECHMay 5, 1992
Abstract: This guideline was developed by a task force comprised of reliability experts and users ofreliability methodologies from the SEMI/SEMATECH member companies. The document was
written to address the needs of semiconductor equipment manufacturers and their customers. It
includes a description of the principles of a cost-effective reliability program, instructions on how
to get started, and details on what needs to be done. A large portion of the document is dedicated
to analysis and testing methodologies. These include: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(FMEA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Component Failure Analysis (CFA), Human Reliability
Analysis (HRA); and Reliability Testing, Component Testing, Accelerated Testing (Sudden Death,
Step-Stress Testing), Burn-in Testing, Life Testing, Environmental Stress Screening, Qualification
Testing, and Acceptance Testing.
Keywords: Life Cycle Phases, Reliability Testing, RAMP, Failure, FRACAS, Failure Modes and EffectsAnalysis, Quality Function Deployment (QFD), Design of Experiment, Cost of Ownership, Infant
Mortality, Reliability Qualification Testing (RQT), Taguchi, Users Groups, Reliability Block
Diagram Modeling (RBD), Environmental Stress Screening (ESS), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
Authors: Dhudsia, Vallabh
Approvals: Vallabh Dhudsia, Project Manager & AuthorKeith Erickson, Director
Dan McGowan, Technical Information Transfer Team Leader
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
4/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
5/162
iii
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Table of Contents
1 SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. 1
2 THE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT LIFE CYCLE........... 2
2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 The Equipment Life Cycle .................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Life Cycle Phases................................................................................................................ 3
2.4 Life Cycle Cost.................................................................................................................... 9
2.5 The Reliability Improvement Process............................................................................... 13
2.6 Applying the Reliability Improvement Process................................................................. 21
2.7 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 23
2.8 References ......................................................................................................................... 24
3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS....................... 25
3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 25
3.2 Managements Role........................................................................................................... 25
3.3 Applying the Reliability Improvement ProcessThe Reliability Improvement Process..... 263.4 Specific Applications of the Reliability Improvement Process......................................... 44
3.4.1 Starting with Equipment in the Design Phasewith Equipment in the Design
Phase .................................................................................................................... 44
3.4.2 Starting with Equipment in the Prototype Phase ................................................... 46
3.4.3 Starting with Equipment in the Pilot Production Phasewith Equipment in the
Pilot Production Phase ......................................................................................... 47
3.4.4 Starting with Equipment in the Production and Operation Phasewith
Equipment in the Production and Operation Phase ............................................. 49
3.4.5 Starting with Equipment in Phase Out Phase with Equipment in Phase Out
Phase .................................................................................................................... 50
3.5 Functional ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities...................................................................... 51
3.6 Where to Begin.................................................................................................................. 52
3.7 Reliability Plans ................................................................................................................ 55
3.8 Application of Resources and Communicating Value ...................................................... 56
3.9 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 57
3.10 References ....................................................................................................................... 58
4 ACTIVITIES AND TOOLS IN THE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS............... 59
4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 59
4.2 Reliability ActivitiesActivities.......................................................................................... 59
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
6/162
iv
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
List of Figures
Figure 2-1. Percent of Total Life Cycle Costs vs Locked-in Costs................................................ 9
Figure 2-2. Impact of a reliability program on life cycle cost...................................................... 11
Figure 2-3. Optimizing Life Cycle Costs..................................................................................... 12
Figure 2-4. Decrease in Life Cycle Costs in New Generations of Equipment............................. 13
Figure 2-5. The Reliability Improvement Process........................................................................ 14
Figure 2-6. Application of Reliability Improvement Process....................................................... 22
Figure 3-1. Multiple Equipment and Their Life Cycle Phase Status............................................ 53
Figure 4-1. A Block Model Developed in RAMP for the SETEC Generic Wafer Handler
System...................................................................................................................... 125
Figure 4-2. An Estimate of the Cumulative Distribution Function for MTBF .......................... 127
Figure 4-3. A Pareto Diagram for Component Contribution to System Failure........................ 128
Figure 4-4. A Revised Block Diagram for the SETEC Generic Wafer Handler System,
showing the Addition of the Redundant Wafer Sensor............................................ 128
Figure 4-5. An Estimate of the Cumulative Distribution Function for MTBF after
Modifying the Generic Wafer Handler System........................................................ 129
Figure 4-6. A Pareto Diagram for Component Contribution to System Failureafter
Modifying the Generic Wafer System...................................................................... 130
Further analysis reveals that C2 fails if parts 1 and 2 (P1 and P2) fail. C4 fails if parts 3
or 4 (P3 or P4) fail. The block diagram model now looks like:.............................. 135
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
7/162
v
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
List of Tables
Table 3-1. Reliability Improvement Process Applied at Six Different Starting Points................. 27
Table 3-2. Reliability Improvement Process Activities ............................................................... 31
Table 3-3. Reliability Improvement Process Activities2-3. Reliability ImprovementProcess Activities for the Design Phase..................................................................... 34
Table 3-4. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the Prototype Phase......................... 37
Table 3-5. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the Pilot Production Phase .............. 40
Table 3-6. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the Production and Operation
Phase .......................................................................................................................... 42
Table 3-7. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the PhaseOut Phase2-7.
Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the PhaseOut Phase ...................... 44
Table 3-8. Design Phase Reliability Improvement Process Activities......................................... 45
Table 3-9. Prototype Phase Reliability Improvement Process Activities..................................... 47
Table 3-10. Pilot Production Phase Reliability Improvement Process Activities When
Initiated In Pilot Production Phase............................................................................. 48
Table 3-11. Production and Operation Phase Reliability Improvement Process Activities
When Initiated in Production and Operation Phase................................................... 50
Table 3-12. Phase Out Phase Reliability Improvement Process Activities When Initiated
in Phase-Out Phase..................................................................................................... 51
Table 3-13. Current Product Line Status...................................................................................... 54
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
8/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
9/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
10/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
11/162
v
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
The SEMATECH Perspective
Statement from Bill Spencer, CEO of SEMATECH:
Todays competitive environment demands an increasing level of reliability in semiconductor
manufacturing equipment. The industry has made great strides in the last four years in improvingreliability. In fact, VLSI Research reports that in its annual customer survey, reliability has fallen
to sixth place on the list of biggest problems, after being number one for 10 years. VLSI is quick
to give SEMATECH credit for much of the improvement. And while the existence of
SEMATECH was a key element, the supplier industry should receive added praise for stepping
up and solving a major problem.
But, as with so much of this business today, reliability is a race without an end. And the formula
to improved reliability is to build it into every stage of development. This Reliability Guideline
will assist in development of a program to ensure consideration of reliability factors at every
stage of product development from inception through qualification.
The Guideline was developed by a task force comprised of reliability experts and users of
reliability methodologies from the SEMI/SEMATECH member companies. As a result, it offers
best-of-breed concepts and is written to meet the needs of semiconductor equipment
manufacturers and their customers. Im sure it will prove an excellent tool.
William J. Spencer
President and Chief Executive Officer
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
12/162
vi
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Preface
These guidelines have been written for use by semiconductor equipment suppliers and customers.
They are intended as a road map that these groups can refer to for assistance in improving the
reliability of their semiconductor manufacturing equipment as part of a long-term strategy aimedat regaining an increased worldwide market share.
Although there is an abundance of reliability information available in text books, military
handbooks and standards, and guidebooks directed at specific products, there is no concise,
single source document available for the semiconductor equipment industry. The purpose of
these guidelines is to fill this gap. To assist in this effort, a task force consisting of
representatives from the semiconductor industry was assembled to provide guidance in the
structure and content of these guidelines. The guidelines do not provide comprehensive
instruction on the details of reliability engineering; rather they provide a description of the
principles of a cost-effective reliability program, instructions on how to get started, and details on
what needs to be done. Descriptions of necessary program activities and reliability concepts are
provided along with references for those who desire additional information.
The focus of the guidelines is on hardware reliability realizing that software reliability is an
important aspect of reliability for a large segment of semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
However, other guidelines exist that address the issue of software reliability. Thus, the software
reliability topic is discussed only briefly.
The guidelines:
Are intended to be of value to managers, reliability engineers, and designers
Are not a "detailed how-to" document, but rather a "roadmap of how to"
Are centered around a continuous improvement process referred to as the
Reliability Improvement Process
Cover the entire equipment life cycle as it applies to the semiconductor equipmentindustry
Even though emphasis is placed on designing in reliability, the guidelines show how to
incorporate reliability into every phase of the equipment life cycle.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
13/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
14/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
15/162
1
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
1 SUMMARY
These guidelines focus on a continuous improvement process referred to as theReliability
Improvement Process, and theEquipment Life Cycle. These two concepts are introduced and
discussed in Section 1.0 of the guidelines. Knowledge of the equipment life cycle is importantbecause it provides a basis for understanding how and where reliability engineering enters into
the process of designing, producing, and operating the equipment. In this document, the life
cycle has been broken into six distinct phases, each representing a unique portion of the life
cycle. These six life cycle phases are:
1. Concept and Feasibility Phase
2. Design Phase
3. Prototype (alpha-site) Phase
4. Pilot Production (beta-site) Phase
5. Production and Operation Phase
6. Phase-out Phase
These phases provide the framework for tracking reliability improvement throughout the
equipment life cycle phases and guidance on when and where to apply resources. Life cycle costs
concepts are introduced to help understand the impact on expenditures and cost of ownership
when reliability is initiated at different phases of the life cycle.
The Reliability Improvement Process provides a means for systematically improving reliability
throughout the equipment life cycle. It is an iterative process of setting goals, evaluating,
comparing, and improving directed toward continuous reliability improvement. It consists of
five basic steps.
1. Establish reliability goals and requirements for equipment2. Apply reliability engineering or improvement activities, as needed
3. Conduct an evaluation of the equipment or equipment design
4. Compare the results of the evaluation to the goals and requirements and make a
decision for the next step
5. Identify problems and root causes
The process then returns to Step 2, and repeats Steps 2 through 5 until goals and requirements are
met.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
16/162
2
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
The role of management in implementing the Reliability Improvement Process is introduced in
Section 2.0. Management has responsibilities in establishing and implementing the Reliability
Improvement Process. These responsibilities include establishing the right environment and
choosing individuals to champion the effort. Section 2.0 provides details on preparing for and
implementing the Reliability Improvement Process, including a discussion on the various
activities associated with each step of the Reliability Improvement Process and each phase of thelife cycle. The Reliability Improvement Process can be used for a piece of equipment regardless
of its placement in the life cycle. The discussion in Section 2.0 includes information on how to
select equipment for initiating reliability improvement, the importance of data, and the choice of
activities when resources are limited.
Activities and tools used in applying the Reliability Improvement Process are discussed in more
detail in Section 3.0. Three types of activities are listed: engineering, datarelated, and testing.
Many of the activities require tools for implementation. These tools come from various
disciplines such as probability and statistics and reliability engineering. References that have
detailed information on the tool or activity are provided at the end of each activity in Section 3.0.
2 THE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT LIFE
CYCLE
2.1 Introduction
The reliability improvement process and the equipment life cycle form the basis for these
guidelines and are introduced in this section. The reliability improvement process is an iterative
process that provides:
An effective and systematic way to include reliability in equipment design
A structure for making reliability improvements throughout the equipment lifecycle
The reliability improvement process provides a means for making revolutionary advancements
when it is applied to equipment early in the design stage, or during major design upgrades, or for
making evolutionary improvements to existing equipment.
Knowledge of the equipment life cycle is important because it provides:
The framework for applying the reliability improvement process
A basis for understanding the best practice for improving equipment reliabilityand the cost of the improvement
Life cycle costs are introduced in this section to provide a perspective on the impact of initiating
the reliability improvement process early in the equipment life cycle. A thorough knowledge of
life cycle costs and life cycle phase relationships helps to achieve better equipment at lower total
costs.
2.2 The Equipment Life Cycle
The equipment life cycle begins when the idea for the equipment is conceived and ends when the
equipment is no longer useful. The life cycle consists ofphases that describe the state of design,
process of development, and production of the equipment. A working knowledge of these phases
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
17/162
3
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
enables proper planning and execution of the activities and functions necessary for designing,
manufacturing, and operating reliable equipment in a cost effective manner.
2.3 Life Cycle Phases
In this document, the life cycle has been divided into the six phases listed below. As indicated,
these six phases can be grouped under three macro phases. The three macro phases aresometimes used in place of the six phases for illustrative purposes; this in no way impacts the
concepts and methodology presented.
1. Concept and Feasibility Concept and Feasibility
2. Design
3. Prototype (alpha (X)-site) Design and Development Macrophases
4. Pilot Production (Beta (B)-site
5. Production and Operations
6. Phase-out Phase Production and Operation
A discussion of each of the six life cycle phases follows.
1. Concept and Feasibility. The life cycle begins with this phase; the need for new
equipment is identified and alternative approaches to fulfilling that need are explored.
The need for new equipment may be based on existing equipment that can no longer
perform its intended function or on customer requirements for which the necessary
equipment does not exist.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
During this phase, marketing and sales personnel, customer service representatives,
design and reliability engineers, and manufacturing engineers work together with the
customer to:
Determine the need for new equipment
Establish reliability goals
Evaluate the feasibility of meeting these goals
Estimate resource requirements
Examine alternative design concepts
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
18/162
4
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Select those concepts to be studied in more detail during the design phase
Estimate cost trade offs
The concept and feasibility phase, and the design phase that follows, are the optimal
times for using design-for-reliability practices.
2. Design. The alternative design concepts selected during the concept and feasibility phaseare explored in more detail by the design engineers during this phase of the life cycle. A
design disclosure package is prepared and evaluated by all concerned parties. Reliability
and manufacturing engineers, as well as quality assurance and field service personnel are
generally called on by the design engineers for input concerning parts selection,
components, serviceability, and manufacturing processes. Also, reliability goals set for
the equipment during the concept and feasibility phase are translated into requirements
very early in the design phase. Requirements are useful in making preliminary reliability
allocations to subsystems and components to understand cost impacts.
This phase of the life cycle can be separated into two parts: preliminary design andfinal
design.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
During the preliminary design process, design and reliability engineers:
Modify goals to meet customer requirements
Evaluate a number of design alternatives
Make preliminary reliability allocations to subsystems and components
Prepare a design disclosure package of requirements and specifications
Estimate cost considerations
More than one design alternative may be selected for the final design phase if serious
questions remain about the best choice.
During the final design process, customer and supplier representatives, design andreliability engineers, project managers, field service personnel, manufacturing engineers,
and quality assurance personnel:
Update reliability allocations to subsystems and components
Carry out design reviews
Implement design-for-reliability practices
Update the design disclosure package to reflect these reviews
Select specific designs for prototype construction
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
19/162
5
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Estimate cost trade offs and considerations
Several iterations of design review and redesign are usually required before a design is
ready for prototype construction. Design reviews are important in measuring the progress
against design requirements and gaining management approval to proceed with the
prototype phase of the life cycle. These reviews are carried out in parallel with the design
process and are often categorized as follows:
Requirements Review - review the equipments design requirements
Preliminary Design Review - evaluate the preliminary design againstrequirements
Critical Design Review - provide design to the customer(s) for review
3. Prototype. Specific designs selected during the design phase are built and tested during
this phase to determine if all design requirements will be met. The prototype phase pro-
vides the first opportunity to validate the entire design, and is therefore commonly called
alpha-site evaluation. Selected customers are included in alpha-site evaluations and are
asked to provide feedback on all aspects of the equipment.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
Multiple design alternatives may require prototyping and testing if serious questions existabout the best overall choice. It is common for reliability engineers to have responsibility
for performing these tests. However, manufacturing personnel will have responsibility
for determining that parts and components conform to specifications within financial
guidelines.
During the prototype phase, design, reliability, test, and manufacturing engineers, as well
as quality assurance personnel:
Build and test one or more prototypes of a design
Present the test results for a pilot production design review
Redesign as needed to fix weaknesses or make other desirable changes Conduct additional design reviews as appropriate
The design reviews should include another critical design review to give the customer an
opportunity to review the latest design being considered.
Concurrent with redesigns and design reviews, reliability engineers, quality assurance
personnel, and manufacturing engineers will develop quality assurance plans, design
inspection and testing programs, set up production facilities, and develop production
plans in preparation for the pilot production phase.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
20/162
6
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
4. Pilot Production. This phase of the life cycle serves as a bridge between the prototype
phase and the production and operation phase. This is the first opportunity for the
equipment to be evaluated in an extended customer environment, and is therefore
commonly called beta-site evaluation. In fact, it may be the first time that the equipment
is exposed to a customers processes.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
The purpose of the pilot production phase is to help identify and correct problems with
the equipment before full-scale production begins. Design and reliability engineers
should evaluate the actual level of equipment reliability and determine what needs to be
accomplished to meet requirements in a cost effective manner.
During the pilot production phase, project management, reliability engineers, manufactur-
ing and test personnel, and customer service representatives:
Qualify the equipment manufacturing process
Establish field trials and customer applications of equipment
Monitor the equipments performance
Identify root causes of failures
Implement a "corrective action" program for reliability problems
Determine cost of ownership
Prior to the production and operation phase of the life cycle, reliability and design
engineers should evaluate equipment reliability and make the appropriate recommen-
dations. If the actual equipment reliability level is less than desired, specific reliability
improvement activities that were identified in the corrective action program should be
implemented. This is the last opportunity to make design changes and other
improvements before full-scale production.
Design reviews conducted at this point are often broken down into:
Qualification Review - verify that the final design meets requirements Production Readiness Review - to determine the readiness of full
production
Reliability Budget Review - verify the reliability goal allocations
If any design changes were made at this point, another critical design review may be
appropriate.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
21/162
7
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
5. Production and Operation. This phase of the life cycle represents the time when units
are produced and sold. All major reliability problems should have been identified and
corrected prior to the production and operation phase. A formal program must be in place
for collecting and analyzing field service data and performance data for the customers
unit as well as for the cost impact.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
During the production and operation phase, field service personnel, management, quality
assurance personnel, and reliability engineers:
Implement a field tracking and customer feedback and satisfactionprogram
Provide training and technical assistance to customers
Document and employ installation testing and operation procedures
Identify and report operation and maintenance problems
Record failure data in a formal database
Manage continuous improvement efforts
Determine cost of ownership impacts
Recorded failure data should account for uncertainty due to variations in site, product
vintage, and customer procedures.
After proper review, decisions are made for resource allocation for continuous improve-
ment in the reliability process. The supplier and customer should function as partners in
these efforts and may participate in user groups.
Once equipment is in the field, it is important to continually monitor reliability, analyze
failures and identify root causes, implement corrective actions, and improve known
causes of failures both for the current and the next generation of equipment.
6. Phase Out. The equipment product line is approaching the end of its useful life during
this final phase of the life cycle. The end of useful life naturally occurs earlier for the
supplier than it does for the customer. The end of useful equipment life for the customer
can occur due to obsolescence, wear, or a change in business plans. To remain
competitive, the supplier must make plans for the next generation of equipment before
phasing out current generation production.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
22/162
8
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
The information gained during the six phases of the life cycle should be retained so that it
can be used to improve future generations of similar or new equipment.
This completes the life cycle for the current generation of equipment. Each new
generation of equipment would experience basically the same life cycle.
Supplier Cost Implications. The early life cycle phases typically represent the smallest portion
of those total life cycle costs borne by the supplier, yet generally represent the region where the
greatest impact on equipment reliability can be made. As a design moves toward completion,
design details become increasingly fixed. Thus, the cost in time and dollars to correct reliability
problems increases. Figure 1-1 shows that typically, toward the end of the design/development
macro phase of the life cycle, only 15% of the life cycle costs are consumed, but approximately
95% of the total life cycle costs have been determined (i.e., locked in).[2] Thus, changes made to
improve reliability after the design/development macro phase have little impact on overall life
cycle costs, but can be very expensive in terms of costly design changes, retrofits, service calls,
warranty claims, and customer goodwill. This is not meant to imply that equipment already in
the production/operation macro phase should be ignored in terms of improving reliability.
Reliability improvement activities should continue throughout the life cycle.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
23/162
9
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Concept/Feasibility Design/Development Production/Operation
Production
3%
12%
85%
(35%)
% Locked-In Costs
%Locked-In
Costs
20
40
60
80
100
0
%TotalCosts
0
20
40
60
80
10095%
Operation (50%)
Source: Arsenault and Roberts, Reliability and Maintainability of Electronic Systems
Figure 2-1. Percent of Total Life Cycle Costs vs Locked-in Costs
Although reliability improvements made earlier in the life cycle can increase initial supplier
costs, they generally result in lower support costs for the supplier and lower operational costs for
the customer. Also, early improvement could reduce the suppliers costs of production, warranty,
and service.
2.4 Life Cycle Cost
Two criteria used by semiconductor manufacturers to select equipment for a manufacturing step
or process are:
1. Technical
2. Economical[1]
The question asked for the technical criterion is, "Can a particular piece of equipment or
equipment line do the manufacturing step or process required?" The question asked for the
economical criterion is, "Does the result of the manufacturing process justify or support the cost
and on-going expense of a particular piece of equipment or equipment line?" It is increasingly
common for several pieces of equipment to be able to meet the technical criterion. Thus, theeconomical criterion is becoming increasingly important. Customers consider not only the initial
purchase price, but the costs associated with equipment operations over its entire life (i.e., life
cycle costs).
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
24/162
10
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Life cycle costs include both equipment supplier costs, which are passed on to the customer in
the purchase price of the equipment, and all costs incurred by the customer over the equipment
life. Supplier costs plus the suppliers gross profit margin are referred to asacquisition costs, and
include:
Research and development
Marketing and sales
Testing and manufacturing
Supplier shipping and installation
Supplier training and support
Supplier service and spare parts
Warranty costs
Continuous improvement
Costs incurred by the customer are referred to as operational costs, and include:
Customer installation and training Operating costs
Customer service costs and spares inventory
Customer performed maintenance
Customer space costs
Scheduled maintenance
Equipment improvements and upgrades
Down time and scrap costs
Disposal costs
Life cycle costs implications to both the supplier and the customer are discussed in the following
paragraphs.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
25/162
11
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Customer Cost Implications. Improvements in reliability made by the supplier early in the
equipment life cycle may result in higher development costs being passed on to the customer in
the equipment acquisition costs. However, this can be more than offset as the customer benefits
by having lower operational costs with increased reliability and up time that results in greater
productivity.
Figure 1-2 illustrates how a reliability program impacts acquisition and operational costs. As thisfigure indicates, acquisition costs may increase due to efforts to improve reliability.
TotalLife
CycleCosts
No FormalReliabilityProgram
With Formal
Operational
CostsOperational
Costs
Acquisition
Costs
Acquisition
Costs
ReliabilityProgram
Total
Life
Cycle
Costs
Figure 2-2. Impact of a reliability program on life cycle cost
However, operational costs, and even more important, total life cycle costs decrease. It is
important for the customer to make equipment purchase decisions based on total life cycle costs
and not just on initial purchase price.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
26/162
12
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Optimizing Life Cycle Costs. Increasing acquisition costs to improve equipment reliability and
lower operational and total life cycle costs is clearly a recommended practice. However, there is
a point at which increasing acquisition costs to obtain higher levels of reliability is no longer
beneficial. Figure 1-3 shows an optimal point beyond which total life cycle costs begin
increasing with further improvements in reliability.
LifeCycleCosts
Reliability
Optimized CostPoint
Acquisition
Costs
Operational
Costs
Life CycleCosts
Figure 2-3. Optimizing Life Cycle Costs
When this occurs, a more reliable technology is required for further improvement.
Reliability insights from a technology used in one generation of equipment should be
documented so they can be used to improve the next generation. Improvements in technology
transfer between equipment generations will generally produce a decrease in the life cycle costs
in each succeeding generation of equipment as shown in Figure 2-4.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
27/162
13
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Generation 1
Generation 2
Generation 3
Generation 4
Life
CycleCosts
Reliability
Figure 2-4. Decrease in Life Cycle Costs in New Generations of Equipment
2.5 The Reliability Improvement Process
The reliability improvement process is an iterative process that is applied at each phase of the
equipment life cycle. It consists of five basic steps:
1. Establish reliability goals and requirements for equipment
2. Apply reliability engineering or improvement activities, as needed
3. Conduct an evaluation of the equipment or equipment design
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
28/162
14
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
4. Compare the results of the evaluation to the goals and requirements and make a
decision to move either to the next step or the next phase
5. Identify problems and root causes
The process then returns to Step 2, and Steps 2 through 5 are repeated until goals and
requirements are met.
The reliability improvement process steps are shown in the flowchart in Figure 1-5.
Establish Goals/Requirements
Step 2.
Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision on
Next Phase
YesAreGoals/Requirements Met?
Figure 2-5. The Reliability Improvement Process
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
29/162
15
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
1. Establish Reliability Goals and Requirements. The first step in the reliability improve-
ment process is to establish reliability goals and requirements. A distinction is made be-
tween goals and requirements. Goals are more internally driven and may or may not be
met. Requirements, on the other hand, are more specific and are customer driven.
Requirements are usually included as deliverables in contractual agreements. Goals arethe starting point, but are modified to satisfy customer requirements early in the equip-
ment life cycle.
Establish Goals/Requirements
Step 2.
Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision on
Next Phase
YesAreGoals/Requirements Met?
All goals have certain common characteristics. The following criteria can be used to
assist in establishing goals[3]:
Attainability: Goals should be set at levels reasonably attainable within
the available time span. Large goals over long periods should be avoidedto maintain interest and commitment. Subgoals over shorter times are
more attainable and more cost effective.
Supportability: Support and resources must be available at the time theyare needed to achieve goals. Advance planning is needed to determine the
resources and the extent to which they can or will be provided.
Acceptability: Goals must be acceptable to those who will be activelyinvolved in pursuing these goals. Acceptance is influenced by relevance,
perceived importance, reasonableness, and desirability of outcome.
Measurability: Goals provide standards against which performance may
be assessed and, therefore, should be selected for suitability and defined ina way that enables measurement. To make them measurable, goals must
be defined qualitatively, quantitatively, and in terms of performance
parameters, values, and time scales.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
30/162
16
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
2. Reliability Engineering and Improvements. Once goals and requirements have been
established, design-for-reliability practices, or reliability improvement activities are
applied to enhance the reliability of equipment that is in any phase of the life cycle, or for
equipment already in existence.
Establish Goals/Requirements
Step 2.
Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision on
Next PhaseGoals/Requirements Met?
Are
There are some basic practices that can be applied to improve reliability. These include:
Simplicity. Simplification of equipment configuration is one of the basicprinciples of designing-for-reliability. Added parts or features increase the
number of failure modes. A common practice in simplification is referred
to as component integration (the use of a single component to perform
multiple functions).
Redundancy. Another reliability improvement practice is to include morethan one way to accomplish a function by having certain components or
subassemblies in parallel, rather than in series. Beyond a certain point,redundancy may be the only cost-effective way to design reliable
equipment.
Proven Components and Methods. To the extent possible, designersshould use components and methods that have been shown to work in
similar applications. Using proven components can minimize analyses
and testing to verify reliability, thus reducing time and costs of
demonstrating reliability of the equipment.
Derating. Derating is the practice of using components or materials atenvironmental conditions or loads that are less severe than their limiting
condition. Under these conditions, the component or material is expectedto be more reliable.
Eliminating Known Causes of Failure (Fault Avoidance). This can beaccomplished through screening and burn-in procedures to eliminate weak
components before equipment is actually shipped to the customer.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
31/162
17
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Failure Detection Techniques. Reliability of equipment can be improvedby incorporating failure detection methods or self-healing devices such as
periodic maintenance schedules, monitoring procedures, automatic sensing
and switching devices.
Ergonomics or Human Factors Engineering. The activities of humans can
be very important to equipment reliability. The equipment design mustconsider human factors aspects such as the person-machine interface,
human reliability, and maintainability.
Conduct Evaluation. The next step in the reliability improvement process is to conduct
an evaluation of the equipment or equipment design to assess its reliability level. A
powerful tool for conducting this evaluation is reliability modeling. For equipment in the
early phases of the life cycle, reliability modeling can be used to predict the equipments
performance to provide information for design changes or for evaluating design alterna-
tives. For equipment that is already in production or is operational in the field, reliability
modeling, combined with testing and failure data analysis, can be used to identify critical
components and help guide resource allocation and reliability improvement decisions.
Establish Goals/Requirements
Step 2.
Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision on
Next Phase
Are
Goals/Requirements Met?
There are a number of reliability prediction models. These include:
Block diagram models. A block diagram is used to logically represent theequipment being modeled by breaking it down into subsystems and
components. Equipment reliability is modeled using failure data on the
subsystems and components.
State transition (Markov) models. Equipment reliability is modeled byidentifying the various operating conditions (states) that the equipment,
subsystem, or component can experience, and the probability of transition
from one state to another.
Other techniques for evaluating equipment reliability and identifying design weaknesses
include:
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
32/162
18
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Fault tree analysis (FTA). A "top down" approach beginning with anundesirable event (usually equipment failure) at the top or system level
and identifying the events at subsequent lower levels that can cause the
undesirable top event.
Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). A technique for
systematically identifying, analyzing, and documenting the possible failuremodes within a design and the effects of such failures on equipment
performance.
Testing is another tool for evaluating equipment reliability. Typically, three different
categories of testing are applied:
1. Component tests - useful in flushing out basic weaknesses in critical
components
2. Systems tests - intended to explore effects of component interactions
3. Reliability demonstration tests - used to demonstrate equipment capability
The above concepts are discussed in more depth in Section 2.0 and 3.0.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
33/162
19
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
4. Are Goals and Requirements Met? Results of the evaluation process are compared to
reliability goals and requirements. If goals and requirements are not met, the problems
and root causes should be identified as described in Step 5, and reliability improvement
activities should be initiated. If goals and requirements are met or exceeded, then approv-
al can be given to move to the next phase of the life cycle, or goals and requirements canbe updated and additional analyses carried out. For example, if the equipment is in the
concept and feasibility or design phase of the life cycle, sensitivity analyses can be
conducted to evaluate design and cost trade-offs such as:
Design complexity versus reliability
Maintainability versus reliability
Increased costs versus reliability
Esbablish Goals/Requirements
Step 2.
Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No Go
Decision on
Next Phase
Step 4.
Are
Goals/Requirements Met?
If goals are, or can be exceeded by a significant margin, then the supplier should
capitalize on the situation by turning it into a competitive leadership position.
Upon completing design trade-off studies, approval can be given to move to the next
phase of the equipment life cycle where the reliability improvement process is again
initiated.
5. Identify Problems and Root Causes. If reliability goals and requirements are not met,
the reasons need to be identified and corrective actions should be taken. Test data on
prototypes or actual equipment in the field can be used to supplement information on
equipment reliability generated from predictive modeling. Testing can also help to
identify causes of failure and any potential reliability problems.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
34/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
35/162
21
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
2.6 Applying the Reliability Improvement Process
Optimal benefits from use of the reliability improvement process are clearly realized when the
process is applied to equipment in the concept and feasibility phase of the life cycle and then
continuously applied thereafter. Benefits can also be realized when the improvement process isapplied to equipment that is in some advanced phase of its life cycle. It is important to address
equipment reliability throughout the life cycle. For example, reliability improvements may be
necessary:
Following the Prototype Phase, because of design deficiencies or parts problemsuncovered during prototype testing
Beginning the Pilot Production Phase, due to reliability related issues resultingfrom manufacturing a new equipment line
During the Production and Operation Phase, because feedback from fieldpersonnel and customers indicate reliability problems due to unanticipated failure
mechanisms.
Activities
Activities associated with applying the reliability improvement process to the equipment life
cycle remains basically the same from one phase of the life cycle to the next. Others, however,
vary because of the change in focus from phase to phase. For example, focus in the concept and
feasibility macro phase is primarily on "planning and allocating;" focus in the design and
development macro phase is primarily on "predicting and verifying;" and focus in the production
and operation macro phase is primarily on "evaluating and improving."
The activities also vary depending on whether the improvement process has been continuously
applied to equipment as it moved through its life cycle from concept and feasibility to phase out,or whether it is being applied for the first time to equipment that is in some advanced phase. For
example, consider equipment in the prototype phase: If the reliability improvement process has
been applied continuously to the equipment in the concept and feasibility phase and in the design
phase, then the reliability goals and requirements already exist. Thus, the reliability goals and
requirements activity consists, primarily, of updating the goals and requirements; the primary
focus would be on prototype testing and corrective action activities. However, if the reliability
improvement process was applied to equipment for the first time during the prototype phase, then
developing reliability goals and requirements should be a major focus because these goals and
requirements do not exist. These concepts are discussed in more detail in Section 2.0.
Figure 1.6 provides a high-level view of the main activities associated with applying the
reliability improvement process to each of the three macro phases of the life cycle. This is
provided primarily to illustrate the flow from one macro phase to the next. A more detailed
discussion of applying the reliability improvement process to all six phases of the life cycle, and
a list of the associated activities, is presented in Section 2.0. Some of the activities will vary as
the reliability improvement process is tailored to a particular need or equipment line. However,
the reliability improvement process remains unchanged.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
36/162
22
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Step 2.Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision onNext Phase
Establish Goals/Requirements
Are
Goals/Requirements Met?
Concept/Feasibility
-Set Reliability Goals
-Create Reliability Program Plan
-Develop Conceptual Designs
-Develop Preliminary Model
-Evaluate Conceptual Designs
-Next Phase Go/No Go Approval
-Identify Problems and Root
Causes
-Develop Corrective Actions
Step 2.Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision onNext Phase
Establish Goals/Requirements
Are
Goals/Requirements Met?
Concept/Feasibility
-Translate Goals into Requirements
-Apply Design-For-Reliability Practices
-Carry out Design Reviews
-Upgrade Reliability Model
-Predict Equipment Performance
-Next Phase Go/No Go Approval
-Identify Problems and Root Causes
-Develop Corrective Actions
Step 2.Reliability Engineering/Improvements
Step 3.
Conduct Evaluation
Step 4.
Step 5.
Identify Problems & Root Causes
No
Go/No GoDecision onNext Phase
Establish Goals/Requirements
Are
Goals/Requirements Met?
Concept/Feasibility
-Revise Goals/Requirements
-Implement Field Tracking System
-Begin Customer Feedback Program
-Start Corrective Action Program
-Upgrade Reliability Model
-Identify Problems and Root Causes
-Develop Corrective Actions
-Begin Phase Out Activities
Figure 2-6. Application of Reliability Improvement Process
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
37/162
23
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
2.7 Summary
Knowledge of the equipment life cycle is important because it provides a basis for understanding
how and where reliability engineering enters into the process of designing, producing, andoperating the equipment. The equipment life cycle is broken into distinct phases, each
representing a unique portion of the equipment life. These phases provide the framework for
tracking reliability throughout the life cycle of the equipment and guidance on when and where to
apply resources. Awareness of life cycle costs help equipment owners understand the impact on
expenditures and cost of ownership when reliability is initiated at different life cycle phases.
The reliability improvement process provides a means for systematically improving reliability
throughout the equipment life cycle. Optimal benefits are realized when reliability is designed
into a piece of equipment. However, it is important to improve reliability throughout the life of
the equipment to meet reliability goals and objectives.
The reliability improvement process is an iterative process of setting goals, then evaluating(predicting), comparing, and improving those goals. Central to the reliability improvement
process is data collection and analysis; design improvements; and operations and maintenance
procedure improvements.
About Section 3.0
The next section provides details on preparing for and implementing the reliability improvement
process. It includes a discussion of the various activities associated with each step of the
improvement process and each phase of the life cycle. In preparation for this discussion, the
following questions may assist in assessing current reliability practices and focus.
1. Is the importance of reliability conveyed throughout the company?
2. Is the approach to reliability improvement reactive or proactive?
3. Is the equipment development process life cycle oriented?
4. Have specific goals and requirements been established for equipment
reliability and its growth?
5. Does the organization have technical and executive managers who
champion the reliability cause?
6. Is demonstrated achievement of reliability goals a part of the criteria for
deciding when equipment is ready for release to market?
7. Does the organization collect data that can readily be used in measuring and
providing guidance for equipment reliability performance?
8. Do indicators of reliability performance exist for all equipment?
9. Are these indicators routinely monitored to ensure achievement of
improvement goals?
10. Is a closedloop failure reporting and corrective action system in place?
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
38/162
24
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
2.8 References
1. SI Staff, "Selecting a Product: The Task at Hand," Semiconductor International,
March 1991, pages 7-8.
2. J. E. Arsenault and J. A. Roberts,Reliability and Maintainability of Electronic
Systems, Potomac, MD:Computer Science Press, 1980.3. W. Grant Ireson and Clyde F. Coombs, Jr.,Handbook of Reliability Engineering
and Management, Editors in Chief, McGraw-Hill, 1988.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
39/162
25
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
3 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
3.1 Introduction
To ensure that maximum benefits are achieved when implementing the reliability improvement
process, it is important to have an understanding of:
Managements role in the implementation process
The activities associated with applying the process
Functional responsibilities in the implementation process
Where to start the process
How to use limited resources and communicate the value of the process
Each of these topics is discussed in this section. Primary focus is given to applying the
reliability improvement process. Activities associated with applying the reliability improvementprocess to equipment in the concept and feasibility phase and continuing throughout its life cycle
are discussed first. Later, the discussion focuses on activities associated with applying the
reliability improvement process to equipment in an advanced phase (other than concept and
feasibility) of the life cycle.
3.2 Managements Role
Management plays a vital role in implementing the reliability improvement process. It has the
responsibility for establishing the right environment, and in choosing individuals to champion the
effort. The champions provide leadership and are accountable for the success of the reliability
improvement process.Managements Responsibility
One of managements primary responsibilities is to convey the importance of reliability
throughout the company. Institutionalizing the reliability improvement process may require a
cultural change and even an organizational change. Therefore, management leadership and
commitment to this change is essential to ensure success. Success also depends on managements
understanding of the activities involved in the reliability improvement process and on their
support of these activities.
Reliability Champions
Selection of reliability champions is critical to the success of the reliability improvement process.
Two reliability champions are recommended for moderate-to-large sized companies: an
executive champion and a technical champion. In a small company, these two roles may be
combined for one person.
Executive Champion. The role of the executive champion is to:
Provide executive leadership in reliability improvement matters
Promote reliability improvement throughout the company
Provide assurance that the reliability improvement process is supported
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
40/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
41/162
27
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Table 3-1. Reliability Improvement Process Applied at Six Different Starting Points
Starting Points/Life Cycle Phase in Which
The Process Applied For The First Time
Reference Sections
Concept and Feasibility Section 3.3.1
Design Section 3.4.1
Prototype Section 3.4.2
Pilot Production Section 3.4.3
Production/Operation Section 3.4.4
Phase Out Section 3.4.5
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
42/162
28
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Starting with Equipment in the Concept and Feasibility Phase
The following paragraphs discuss the activities that are performed when the reliability
improvement process is first applied to equipment in the concept and feasibility phase and then
continuously applied in subsequent phases. The discussion for each life cycle phase concludes
with a list of objectives that will have been met as a result of applying the reliability
improvement process, and a table summarizing the activities associated with applying the processto that phase of the life cycle.
Concept and Feasibility
Step 1. Establish Goals and Requirements. In the concept and feasibility phase, the focus of
Step 1 is on establishing goals to meet customer requirements. Later these goals may be revised,
and are eventually modified to reflect changes in customer requirements, or in response to
observations regarding equipment performance level.
Concept/Feasibility
Design
Prototype (a-site)
Pilot Production (b-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
Goals can be established based on:
Customer Voice
. When establishing reliability goals, it is important to considerwho the customers are and what aspects of reliability they regard as most
important. The supplier must fully understand customers needs, and be able to
translate these needs into equipment-specific information for setting goals.
Competitive Benchmarking. Competitive benchmarking is a process used bysuppliers to measure and compare their products, services, and operations against
competitors and world class performers.
Reverse Engineering. The systematic dismantling of equipment with a highreliability ranking is referred to as reverse engineering. The information obtained
provides information about the actual reliability of similar equipment and the
technology used to achieve that reliability.
Warranty Requirements. To remain competitive, the reliability goals mustsupportthe established warranty requirements.
Equipment Maintenance. It is essential to discuss maintenance aspects of theequipment with field personnel when establishing reliability goals. Improperly
addressing maintenance issues can lead to a design with very high user-perceived
reliability, but prohibitive maintenance costs.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
43/162
29
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Once goals have been established, a reliability program plan is created that documents how these
goals will be achieved. It defines:
Activities to be performed
Resources required to fulfill the activities
Schedule for these activities Procedures by which the activities will be performed
Organizations and interfaces required to perform the activities
The program plan provides management and the customer with a means of measuring progress
and assuring that requirements will be accomplished.
Step 2. Reliability Engineering and Improvements. In the concept and feasibility phase, Step
2 of the reliability improvement process focuses first on developing alternative design concepts.
All possible alternatives should be identified and evaluated to ensure that those selected for the
design phase are capable of fulfilling goals and requirements. Functional block diagrams are
used to develop the basic concepts for the equipment and to evaluate their feasibility. The
functional block diagram is updated as the concept changes.
The next step is to develop a preliminary model of the equipmentusing the functional block
diagrams. The initial model is created at a gross level; that is, the equipment is broken into a few
(approximately 10 to 20) major subsystems. This model is used to make initial predictions of the
equipment reliability (Step 3).
A reliability allocation is conducted to allocate the equipment reliability goal into the individual
major subsystems. This is done to make equipment reliability requirements more manageable and
to establish individual reliability requirements for each major subsystem. Since no detailed
information on the equipment is yet available, the allocation process is approximate; it is used to
guide the designer when developing various concepts.
In this phase, the equipment has not been built, so other sources of data are required.Historical
data can be used for those subsystems that are similar to previous generations of equipment. For
those subsystems for which no historical data is available, expert judgementcan be used. Expert
judgement takes the opinion of individuals that are considered to be knowledgeable about a
subsystem or component and uses this knowledge to create initial reliability values.
Another reliability engineering activity available for identifying conceptual design weaknesses is
afailure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). This is a technique for systematically identifying,
analyzing and documenting the possible failure modes within a design and the effects of such
failures on equipment performance.
The process of setting up an FMEA is initiated in this step, but it is used later in Step 5 to helpidentify problems and root causes.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
44/162
30
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Step 3. Conduct Evaluation. The subsystem failure data and the reliability prediction model
are used to evaluate the reliability of the conceptual design. A reality check assures that the
predicted reliability value makes sense. Evaluate the following:
Predicted versus the anticipated reliability value
Historical and expert opinion data used to calculate equipment reliability
Reliability prediction model
Conceptual design review(s) of the concepts that will be carried to the design phase are
conducted at this point. These design reviews are also useful in evaluating the current level of
the predicted reliability of the concepts being considered.
Step 4. Are Goals and Requirements Met? A comparison is made between established goals
and the predicted reliability values. If the goals are not met, continue to Step 5 where problems
and root causes are identified. If the goals are met or exceeded, approval is eventually given to
move to the design phase of the life cycle, where goals may be modified to meet customer
requirements.
Step 5. Identify Problems and Root Causes. If goals are not met, problems and root causesshould be identified. Sensitivity analyses can be conducted to direct attention to those
subsystems that have the greatest impact on the equipment reliability.
If an FMEA was developed in Step 2, use it to examine the potential failure modes identified and
to establish possible root causes.
The reliability improvement process now returns to Step 2 (reliability improvement and growth
activities are initiated). These might include:
Adding high-level redundancy
Using proven high reliability components and parts
Forming partnerships with sub-tier suppliers Derating
Once the conceptual design improvements have been selected and incorporated, both the
functional block diagram and the reliability prediction model are re-evaluated. The model and the
data used in the model are changed to reflect the conceptual design improvements. If an FMEA
was initiated, it is also updated to reflect design changes.
Steps 2 through 5 are repeated until goals are met and approval is given to move to the design
phase of the life cycle.
At the end of concept and feasibility phase, the following objectives have been met:
Reliability goals have been established and allocated to major subsystems A reliability program plan has been initiated
Conceptual designs that form the basis of the equipment design are determined
Feasibility that selected conceptual designs will meet goals is demonstrated
Table 3-2 summarizes the activities associated with applying the reliability improvement process
to the concept and feasibility phase. There are three designators used for the activities:
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
45/162
31
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
E(engineering), D(data), T(testing). These designators followed by a number provides the
location of the activity in Section 3.0.
Table 3-2. Reliability Improvement Process Activities
Reliability
Improvement
Process Step
Activities
1. Establish Goals and
Requirements
- Establish reliability goals (E1)
- Create reliability program plan (E2)
2. Reliability
Engineering and
Improvements
- Develop functional block diagrams (E3)
- Create preliminary reliability model (E4)
- Allocate reliability goals (E5)
- Collect historical failure data (D1)- Develop preliminary FMEA (E14)
- Develop preliminary Life Cycle Cost (AT19)
3. Conduct Evaluation - Preliminary prediction of equipment reliability (E6)
- Conceptual design review(s) (E7)
4. Are Goals and
Requirements Met?
- Compare goals to predicted reliability values
- If goals are not met, continue to Step 5
- If goals are met move to design phase of life cycle
5. Identify Problems
and Root Causes
- Perform sensitivity analyses using reliability model (E8)
Design
Step 1. Establish Goals and RequirementsGoals and Requirements. The reliability goals
established in the concept and feasibility phase of the life cycle are modified and become
reliability requirements in the design phase. Requirements need to be well-defined so that they
are understandable by design engineers and manufacturers. Requirements should be broad in
nature and be both qualitative (e.g., definition of responsibilities and program requirements) and
quantitative (e.g., mean time between failures and uptime).
Concept/Feasibility Design
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
46/162
32
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
System level requirements are allocated to major subsystems and components.
Once reliability requirements have been established, the reliability program plan is updated to
reflect these requirements.
Step 2. Reliability Engineering and ImprovementsEngineering and Improvements.Design-for-reliability practices are applied at this step in the improvement process. Application
of design-for-reliability practices creates a proactive environment for the design team. Some of
the more basic practices include:
Simplicity. Simplification of equipment configuration is one of the basicprinciples of designing-for-reliability. Added parts or features increase the
number of failure modes. A common practice in simplification is referred to as
component integration, which is the use of a single component to perform
multiple functions.
Proven Components. To the extent possible, designers should use components
that have been shown to work in similar applications. Using proven componentscan minimize analyses and testing to demonstrate reliability of equipment.
Derating. Derating is the practice of using components or materials at environ-mental conditions or loads that are less severe than their limiting condition.
Under these conditions, the component or material is expected to be more reliable.
Redundancy. Another reliability improvement practice is to include more thanone method for accomplishing a function by having certain components or
subassemblies in parallel, rather than in series. Beyond a certain point,
redundancy may be the only cost-effective way to design reliable equipment.
Failure Detection. Reliability of equipment can be improved by incorporating
failure detection methods such as automatic sensing and switching devices. Ergonomics or Human Factors Engineering. The equipment design must
consider human factors aspects such as the person-machine interface, human
reliability, and maintainability.
The functional block diagram is updated as the design develops. The gross reliability model,
which consists of major subsystems, is expanded. Each subsystem is broken into more detail.
For example, a wafer handler subsystem could be categorized into software, electronics, arm, and
casing components. The reliability allocated to a subsystem is further allocated to the component
level. As was the case in the concept and feasibility phase, this allocation is based on limited
information available during the early phases of the life cycle; it is used as a guide when
developing the various designs. As the design progresses, the allocation becomes finalized.If an FMEA was not developed in the concept and feasibility phase of the life cycle, initiate it in
this phase.
As was the case in the concept and feasibility phase, equipment in the design phase has not yet
been built, so actual component failure data may not be available. Here again, historical data can
be used for those components that are similar to previous generations of equipment. Use
standard handbooks (such as MIL-HDBK-217[1] or NPRD-91 Handbook[2]), or expert opinion
to obtain data for those components where no historical data is available.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
47/162
33
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
If a critical component is used for the first time and the life data is not available, run a simulated
life test to generate the life data under the expected use conditions.
Step 3. Conduct Evaluation. Use the subsystem and component failure data, and the updated
reliability prediction model, to evaluate the reliability of the current equipment design. As wasthe case in the concept and feasibility phase, evaluate the following:
Data sources and their validity
Predicted versus the anticipated reliability value
Historical and expert opinion data used in determining equipment reliability
Reliability prediction model
Conduct design review(s) of the design(s) that will be carried to the prototype phase at this time.
These reviews are often broken down into:
Requirements Review - review the equipments design requirements
Preliminary Design Review - evaluate the preliminary design against requirements Critical Design Review - provide design to the customer(s) for review
Step 4. Are Goals and Requirements Met? Compare the reliability requirements and the
predicted reliability values. If requirements are not met, continue to Step 5 where problems and
root causes are identified. If requirements are met, approval is given to move to the prototype
phase of the life cycle.
Step 5. Identify Problems and Root Causes. If requirements are not met, sensitivity analyses
can be conducted to direct attention to those subsystems and components that have the greatest
impact on the equipment reliability. Evaluate the FMEA that was developed in Step 2 todetermine potential failure modes of the subsystems and components.
The process now returns to Step 2, where reliability improvement activities are initiated.
Steps 2 through 5 are repeated until requirements are met. Approval can then be given
to move to the prototype phase of the life cycle.
At the end of the design phase, the following objectives have been met:
The core architecture of the equipment design has been finalized
Design(s) have been chosen for prototype
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
48/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
49/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
50/162
36
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
The actual failure modes that are uncovered during testing, should be recorded in the FRACAS,
and compared to the predicted failure modes established in the FMEA. Where difference occur,
the reasons should be identified.
Step 3. Conduct EvaluationEvaluation. Reliability of the various prototypes is evaluated
based on the test data.
Results of the prototype test are then presented for a design review prior to pilot production.
Step 4. Are Goals and Requirements Met?Goals and Requirements Met? Compare the
results of the testing of the prototype(s) to the requirements to see if they have been met. If the
requirements are not met, move to Step 5, where problems and root causes are identified. If
requirements are met, then a design review is performed, including a management go/no go
decision to continue to the pilot production phase of the life cycle.
Step 5. Identify Problems and Root CausesProblems and Root Causes. A sensitivity
analysis is conducted to direct attention to those subsystems and components that have the
greatest impact on the equipment reliability. Root causes of the failures recorded in the
FRACAS are identified and corrective actions implemented. A more detailed failure analysismight also be performed on those subsystems and components that are failing at a significantly
higher rate than previously anticipated.
The process now returns to Step 2, where improvement activities are initiated. If a FRACAS was
initiated, it might identify corrective actions that could be implemented to eliminate failures.
Other possibilities include:
Derating
Procedural changes
Process changes
Apreventive maintenance (PM) program can be developed for subsystems and components thatdegrade equipment performance. Partnerships established with suppliers are continually
nurtured and purchased subsystems and components are continually evaluated. Human
capabilities and limitations are considered and changes are made to the equipment to eliminate
failures due to human errors. The software reliability program is continued. For critical
subsystems and components, the optimal operating range is found and the impact of the optimal
range on other components is evaluated.
Steps 2 through 5 are repeated until requirements are met. Approval can then be given to move
to the pilot production phase of the life cycle.
At the end of the prototype phase, the following objectives have been met:
The prototype(s) has been tested and evaluated to determine its capability ofachieving the requirements. This includes redesigning and re-evaluating until a
go/no go decision is reached
The core subsystem and component designs are finalized.
Table 3-4 summarizes the activities associated with applying the reliability improvement process
to the prototype phase.
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
51/162
37
Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN SEMATECH
Table 3-4. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the Prototype Phase
Reliability Improve-
ment Process Step Activities
1. Establish Goals
and Requirements
- Update reliability requirements (E1)
- Update reliability program plan (E2)
2. Reliability
Engineering and
Improvements
- Update functional block diagram (E3)
- Expand reliability model, as needed (E4)
- Re-allocate subsystem and component reliability requirements (E5)
- Establish test plan (T1)
- Conduct Prototype test (T2)
- Establish FRACAS (E17)
- Perform human reliability analysis (D2)
- Develop preventive maintenance program (E10)
- Continue to evaluate the reliability of purchased components (E11)
- Perform ergonomics studies (E12)
- Conduct software reliability studies (E13)
- Update Life Cycle Cost (AT19)
3. Conduct
Evaluation
- Evaluate prototype reliability (T2)
- Conduct design review(s) (E7)
4. Are Goals and
Requirements Met?
- Compare reliability requirements to predicted values
- If requirements are not met, continue to Step 5
- If requirements are met move to pilot production phase of life cycle
5. Identify Problems
and Root Causes
- Perform sensitivity analyses (E8)
- Evaluate FRACAS to identify problems and root causes (E17)- Evaluate FMEA to identify potential failure modes (E14)
- Perform failure analyses on critical components (E16)
Pilot ProductionProduction
Step 1. Establish Goals and RequirementsGoals and Requirements. During the pilot
production phase, upgrades are made to goals and requirements, as appropriate, and the reliability
program plan is updated to reflect these, as well as other, changes. Modeling and failure data
analyses are used to assess current and potential levels of equipment performance.
Concept/FeasibilityDesign
Prototype (-site)
Pilot Production (-site)
Production/Operation
Phase Out
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
52/162
38
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Step 2. Reliability Engineering and ImprovementsEngineering and Improvements.
Functional block diagrams and the reliability model are once again updated to reflect any changes
that occurred during the prototype phase. If a FRACAS was not implemented during the
prototype phase, then it should be done at this time.
The test program is evaluated and updated as needed. Any aspects of the test program that are
not clearly defined during the prototype phase should be established here. Additional tests that
should be implemented at this time are:
Burn-in tests
Reliability qualification tests (RQT)
Burn-in tests are useful in identifying weak components or subsystems prior to field use.
An RQT is useful in initial customer applications of the equipment to evaluate equipment
performance in actual operating environments. The RQT is also useful in verifying compliance
with contractual objectives; whereby, equipment is tested according to a predetermined plan
under specified environmental conditions and pass/fail criteria prior to a full-scale productiondecision[3]. Testing equipment in an environment that represents usage throughout its service
life allows for establishing reasonable correlations between test results and actual field
experience.
The manufacturing processes should be qualified at this time to avoid the manufacturing
problems identified during the pilot production. Qualifying manufacturing processes before
full-scale production reduces manufacturing costs and prevents equipment performance
degradation[4]. Qualifying manufacturing processes includes:
Performing a process capability study
Establishing process control
Monitoring the defect level Reducing the defect level
Periodically assessing and controlling the processes[5]
Both new and existing manufacturing processes should be requalified periodically to ensure
requirements are maintained. Personnel involved in the manufacturing process should be
properly trained before introduction of the equipment.
Step 3. Conduct EvaluationEvaluation. The pilot production phase of the life cycle is
generally the first time equipment is evaluated in a customer environment. Thus, reliability
modeling and prototype testing, engineers should work closely with customer service and field
service personnel to evaluate initial customer applications of the equipment to evaluate its
performance in actual operating environments. A reliability qualification test (RQT) isperformed to verify compliance with contractual objectives.
Problems and failures occurring during testing should be carefully analyzed, and
recommendations for corrective action should be issued as part of the FRACAS. Failure modes
identified in the FMEA are compared to reported failures during testing. Differences that occur
should be analyzed.
Definitions of failures should be issued, and pass-fail criteria should be established. Failures
generally fall into four categories[5]:
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
53/162
-
7/31/2019 Reliability Guidelines
54/162
40
SEMATECH Technology Transfer # 92031014A-GEN
Table 3-5. Reliability Improvement Process Activities for the Pilot Production Phase
Reliability
Improvement
Process StepActivities
1. Establish Goals
and Requirements
- Update reliability requirements, as needed (E1)
- Update reliability program plan (E2)
2. Reliability
Engineering and
Improvements
- Update functional block diagram, if needed (E3)
- Update reliability model, if needed (E4)
- Re-allocate reliability requirements, as needed (E5)
- Upgrade testing program, as needed (T1)
- Implement FRACAS, if not already done (E17)
- Perform human reliability analyses (D2)
- Perform software reliability studies (E13)
- Perform ergonomic studies (E12)
- Update preventive maintenance program, as needed (E10)- Continue to evaluate reliability of purchased components (E11)
- Update Life Cycle Cost (AT19