Release 12 Demo
-
Upload
supratik-dey -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
0
Transcript of Release 12 Demo
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
1/27
Demo Release 12 Functionalities
--
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
2/27
Definition:-
Business Group
Legal Entity
Operating Unit
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
3/27
Architecture Organization Model Release 12
Business GroupThis is an Organization thatrepresents the consolidatedenterprise, a major division,
or an operation company andhas no accounting impact.The Business Group partitionsHuman Resources informationand the Purchasing Approval
Hierarchy.
Oracle Modules:
HRMS
Payroll
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
4/27
Legal Entity Oracle Modules:
GL
FA
A legal entity represents a legal company
for which you prepare fiscal or tax reports.
You assign tax identifiers and other legal entity
information to these types of organizations.
Future enhancements will include greater
functionality at this organization level.
Architecture Organization Model Release 12
Organization Definition:
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
5/27
Operating Unit
Oracle Modules:
PO
Payables
Payments
AR
Cash Management
Architecture Organization Model Release 12
Organization Definition:
The Operating Unit is an organization that uses
Oracle, Cash Management, Order Management
and Shipping Execution, Oracle Payables,
Oracle Purchasing and Oracle Receivables.
The operating unit may be a sales office, a
division or a department. The Operating Unit has
to be assigned to a Legal Entity and a Set of
Books.
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
6/27
What is TCA and its Background
A Trading Community is The participants in a community and their
relationship to one another
Competitor
Employee
Partner
Customer /Organization
Supplier
Competitor of Partner of
Employee of Supplier of
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
7/27
What is TCA and its Background TCA = Trading Community Architecture Provides a single, universal definition of trading
partners across applications and job function
TCA is an Data Model it is not a Module
TCA Data Model
HZ Schema
TCA Enabling InfrastructureCommon Party UI, DQM, D&B Integration, APIs
Sales /
ServiceMarketing
Financials
AP, AR
Financials
GL, FA, POHR
Oracle E-Business Suite Application Families*
3rd PartySystems
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
8/27
What is TCA and its Background
TCA (Trading Community Architecture) Party Definition
TCA Central Data Model
Supplier Representation
New Bank Model
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
9/27
TradingCommunityArchitecture
TradingCommunityArchitecture
Payables
PayablesPurchasi
ngPurchasi
ng
GlobalTax
RecievaRecievablesbles
Governments,Geographies,Authorities, etc
PartyInformatio
n
CashManageme
ntBanks and
Branches
Suppliers
OracleOracle
ERPERP CRMCRM 3rd Party3rd Party
TradingCommunityArchitecture
TradingCommunityArchitecture
TCA in R12: Leveraging centralized datamodel
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
10/27
TCA in R12: Supplier
Representation Suppliers are organizations in TCA Supplier organization, address, contact, phone, email
etc. are all in TCA
Employees are already in TCA, Payables use the same
employee records in TCA New supplier maintenance are done using UI in TCA
components (DQM)
Terms of doing business with the supplier are
in Purchasing / Payables
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
11/27
TCA in R12
New Bank Account Model
Central place to define internal bankaccounts Keep track of all bank accounts in one place
Explicitly grant account access to multipleoperating units/functions and users
Multi-Org Access In the new model, bank accounts are owned by
Legal Entities with the option to grant accountuse to Operating Unit (Payables, Receivables),Legal Entity (Treasury), Business Group (Payroll)
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
12/27
TCA in R12: Bank Account Model
OU A
OU B
OU CBankSingle
Payment
Instruction
Invoices
Payments
SubSub
LedgerLedger
AccountiAccounti
ngng
SubSub
LedgerLedger
AccountiAccounti
ngng
New Payments Module
New Bank Module
New Bank & Credit Card Features
Pay invoices from different OUs with 1 instruction
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
13/27
MOAC: Multi-Org Access Control
Role based access to Operating Units
Define Security Profile
MOAC Usage
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
14/27
Area of Impact Single Organizations Multiple Organizations
Impact on Business Processes
Day-to-day business processese.g., Invoice creation, Payment
processing etc
Potentially executed once for all threebusiness functions combined
Executed multiple times once for eachorganization
Running Reports in Sub-ledger Potentially executed once for all three
business functions combined
Depending on security and access typically
executed multiple times once for eachorganization. Consolidated reports can be
run for those with multiple organizationalaccess
Month-end operations Done once per month in each module To be done multiple times once per
organization per month in each module.
However R12 allows users to close multipleorganizations at once in order to streamline
efficiency.
Visibility of master data e.g.
Vendors (Suppliers), Customers
etc.
Visible for all business functions within
the same organization
Only master data is shared between the
organizations. The other data needs to be
assigned to each organization e.g.: onlyVendor header level data is shared while
vendor-site level data needs to be assignedseparately in each organization. This is
handled through a centralized access
screen
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
15/27
Impact on Project (Implementation Effort)
Application configuration Configuration is required for oneorganization (less effort).
However, the complexity of configurationmay increase (more effort).
Configuration is required for each organization(more effort).
However, it offers more flexibility to meetrequirements of each business function.
Need for custom extensions The FAO HQ and Field share similar
business processes but their focus differs.As a result, there is a higher likelihood of
custom extensions to support thesedifferences. (more effort) This isparticularly true with respect to the FAO
HQ requirements.
Custom extensions are less likely (less effort)
Reporting Report development could be complex
particularly if the reporting requirements
between the three areas differsignificantly. There will also be an issue
to segregate the FAO HQ and Field reportdata.
Reporting will be less of a challenge with
separation by organization and will not have
the complexity of a single organization.
Area of Impact Single Organizations Multiple Organizations
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
16/27
Testing With all of the FAOs business processessharing the same organization, the potentialfor intrusive customizations (changes toOracle code) may be required. Future
Oracle patches could increase IT effort(testing and planning). Since all of the FAOHQ business processes would be containedin one organization, only one organizationwould require testing, which could involve ashorter testing cycle.However, if the future business processesvary significantly, even though, one
organization is used, future testing
complexity is increased.
Testing effort will be higher as the testing needswill have to ensure each Field & FAO HQ are inplace.
Configuration Migration Final configuration will need to be migratedonly once per organization per applicationsenvironment setup
Configuration needs to migrated for eachorganization environment (more effort).However, configuring separate organizations isless of an effort with R12.
Training The training process and learning curve will
be similar regardless of the number oforganizations. The difference will be user
access as some users may have access tomultiple legal entities. This data restrictionmight be more of an issue with only oneorganization.
The training process and learning curve will be
similar regardless of the number oforganizations. The difference will be user
access as some users may have access tomultiple legal entities. Data restriction andsecurity is not an issue with multipleorganizations. Data segregation is a standardfeature.
Area of Impact Single Organizations Multiple Organizations
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
17/27
Area of Impact Single Organizations Multiple Organizations
IT Efforts With all of the FAO HQ & Field businessprocesses sharing the same
organization, the potential for intrusive
customizations (changes to Oracle
code) may be required. Future Oraclepatches could increase IT effort (testingand planning). This would primarily be
due to ensuring mock data segregationand to meet reporting requirements.
With custom code, there is always a
risk of invaliding areas of support fromOracle.
With Multiple organizations, intrusivecustomizations will likely not be required.
Therefore, impact to the FAOs patching
strategy and upgrades could be reduced.
Oracle Support With one organization, as mentionedabove, there is a potential for the
requirement for intrusivecustomizations (changes to Oraclecode). This could impact the
effectiveness of Oracle Support asintrusive customizations, by nature, are
not supported by Oracle.
With Multiple organizations, intrusivecustomizations will likely not be required.
In this scenario, there should be littleimpact to the effectiveness of OracleSupport.
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
18/27
Perform multiple tasks across operatingunits without changing responsibilities
MOAC: Multi-Org Access ControlRole based access to Operating Units
ResponsibilityResponsibility ResponsibilityResponsibility ResponsibilityResponsibility
HQ
Legal Entity Functional TasksRequisition,Purchase Orders
Receiving & DropShip
Supplier Invoices
PaymentsCustomer Data
Management
Accounting Setup
Functional TasksRequisition,
Purchase Orders
Receiving & DropShip
Supplier Invoices
PaymentsCustomer Data
Management
Accounting Setup
SingleResponsibility
Mozambique
OperatingUnit
FAO HQ
OperatingUnit
Congo
OperatingUnit
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
19/27
MOAC - UsageTypical Screen in daily use
Invoice Entry
Quick Invoices
PO EntryReceiving
Supplier Sites
Customer Sites
OU Specific Set Ups
OU Specific Reports
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
20/27
&Q U E S T I O SA N S W E R S
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
21/27
FAO Architecture
Components of TCATCA and its implications w.r.t
FAO
MOAC Definitions &
Implications
MOAC Demos
Oracle Architecture / TCA /
MOAC
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
22/27
Buyers Workbench
Personalization of Buyers
Workbench
PO Types
Line Types
PO Requisitions
Standard POs, ContractAgreements,
Global POs
Service Orders, Goods
Purchasing Part 1
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
23/27
PO on the Field
Receiving Pay on Receipt
6 Different Scenarios
iProcurement
Purchasing - Part 2
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
24/27
Quick Invoices
Invoice Import Centralized Shared Services
Invoice Workbench
Payables
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
25/27
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
26/27
Organizations
(Organization)
AR(Customer)
John, XYZ Inc fao.org
Party:ABC Co.
Party:John, XYZ
Inc.
Old Model
TCA Model
AP/PO(Supplier)
John, XYZ Inc
Customerof
Supplierof *
-
8/7/2019 Release 12 Demo
27/27
TCA Data Model: Visualization
PARTY
SITE
PARTY
SITE
PARTY
SITE
Bill to
Ship to
Division Of
Bill to
Ship to
Bill to
Ship to
Account Account Account
Bill to, Ship to Bill to, Ship to Bill to, Ship to
Acct
Site
Acct
Site
Acct
Site