Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

27
Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation December 8, 2012 North American Neuromodulation Society 16 th Annual Scientific Meeting Wynn Hotel, Las Vegas Nevada Joshua P. Prager, M.D., M.S.

description

Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation. December 8, 2012 North American Neuromodulation Society 16 th Annual Scientific Meeting Wynn Hotel, Las Vegas Nevada Joshua P. Prager, M.D., M.S. Highlights of the Inpatient Hospital Final Rule. Update for FY 2013 is 2.8% - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Page 1: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

December 8, 2012North American Neuromodulation Society16th Annual Scientific MeetingWynn Hotel, Las Vegas NevadaJoshua P. Prager, M.D., M.S.

Page 2: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Inpatient Hospital Final Rule

Update for FY 2013 is 2.8% Market-basket update of 2.6% for hospitals that report

quality information Reduction of -0.7% for multifactor productivity

adjustment Reduction of -0.1 required by the Affordable Care Act Net adjustment of +1.0% for documentation and coding

With additional neutrality and other contributing factors, payment impact analysis shows aggregate payments increasing by 2.3% in FY 13.

CMS projects that Medicare operating payments will increase about $2.45 billion in FY 2013.

Page 3: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

‒ Rates do not include the impact of a -2% reduction to Medicare provider payments (2013-2021) from the automatic “sequester” provisions enacted in the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011, slated to take effect after January 1, 2013 and applied across the board to all Medicare payments. Barring congressional action to delay or replace this provision, cuts will take effect.

Outlier Threshold FY13 is $21,821. from $22,385 (FY12)

Charge CompressionCMS finalized its proposal not to use data from the new implantable device cost center to calculate weights in FY2013

Page 4: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

• Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program– This program will begin in FY 2013 with payment reductions to

certain hospitals that have excess readmissions for three selected conditions:  heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia. 

• Discussion of Add-On Payments for New Services & Technologies– CMS received 6 applications for New Tech Add-On Payment;

2 applicants later withdrew. CMS finalized three new technology add-on payments in the final rule and denied one.

• Impact to SCS, TDD and ITB– DRGs that typically come into play for SCS, TDD (Pain & ITB)

to see an increase in FY 13 with one exception-(DRG 040).

Page 5: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Inpatient Hospital Final Rule SCS & TDD (Pain)

Page 6: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final Rule

• 2013 Update– The 2013 payment conversion factor for OPPS is finalized at

$71.313, which reflects a 1.8% increase. – CMS projects that Medicare operating payments will increase about

$4.6 billion in CY 2013.

Call to Action-Pump refills– CMS elected not to reclassify the CPT 62369-70 to a more

appropriate APC that would more accurately reflect the complexity and time associated with a pump refill. These codes will continue to map to APC 0691, however, this APC has a 14.5% increase in reimbursement.

Pharmacy – Separately payable drugs are moving from current ASP +4% to

ASP+6%. The added 6% includes combined acquisition and pharmacy overhead.

Page 7: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final Rule, cont’

– $80 per day cost/packaging threshold for CY 2013. Current threshold is $70. Lioresal (J0475 & J0476) and Prialt (J2278) meet the cost threshold and are separately payable in the hospital outpatient site of service.

• Charge Compression– As discussed in the proposed rule, CMS finalized the use of

the new “implantable devices charged to patient” cost center to set payments under the OPPS. This was established in 2009 to reflect that hospitals typically mark-up higher-cost devices less than they mark-up lower cost devices. This results in approximately 6% of the payment increase for neurostimulator devices and implantable infusion pumps.

Page 8: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final Rule

Spinal Cord Stimulation

•Reimbursement for neurostimulator insertion to increase 8.1% to $16,395.

•Reimbursement for paddle lead insertion to increase 9.3% to $6,792.

•Reimbursement for percutaneous lead insertion to decrease slightly by 1.4% to $4,400.

•Programming services will see reimbursement reductions

Page 9: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final RuleSpinal Cord Stimulation

CPT CPT Description 2012 Final

Relative Weight

2012 Final APC

Payment

2013 Final

Relative Weight

2013 Final APC

Payment

% Change

63650 Implant neuroelectrodes 63.7054 4,460.40$ 61.6966 4,399.77$ -1.4%

63655 Implant neuroelectrodes 88.7278 6,212.37$ 95.2427 6,792.04$ 9.3%

63661 Remove spine eltrd perq aray 20.9261 1,465.16$ 21.1894 1,511.08$ 3.1%

63662 Remove spine eltrd plate 20.9261 1,465.16$ 21.1894 1,511.08$ 3.1%

63663 Revise spine eltrd perq aray 63.7054 4,460.40$ 61.6966 4,399.77$ -1.4%

63664 Revise spine eltrd plate 63.7054 4,460.40$ 61.6966 4,399.77$ -1.4%63685 Insrt/redo spine n generator 216.5685 15,163.26$ 229.8982 16,394.73$ 8.1%

63688 Revise/remove neuroreceiver 30.9298 2,165.58$ 36.4346 2,598.26$ 20.0%

95970 Analyze neurostim no prog 1.2013 84.11$ 1.1195 79.83$ -5.1%

95972 Analyze neurostim complex 1.6007 112.07$ 1.5631 111.47$ -0.5%

95973 Analyze neurostim complex 1.2013 84.11$ 1.1195 79.83$ -5.1%

Page 10: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final Rule

Targeted Drug Delivery•Reimbursement for bolus/single day trials to increase 8.2% to $566.

•Reimbursement for continuous infusion/multiple day trials to decrease 5.1% to $857.

•Permanent catheter insertion to increase 11.5% to $3,251.

•Pump Insertion to increase 4.5% to $14,111.

•Pump refills to increase 14.5% to $192.

Page 11: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Outpatient Hospital Final RuleTargeted Drug Delivery

CPT CPT Description 2012 Final

Relative Weight

2012 Final APC

Payment

2013 Final

Relative Weight

2013 Final APC

Payment

% Change

62311 Inject spine lumbar/sacral 7.4678 522.87$ 7.9333 565.75$ 8.2%

62319 Inject spine w/cath lmb/scrl 12.8874 902.32$ 12.0130 856.68$ -5.1%

62350 Implant spinal canal cath 41.6627 2,917.06$ 45.5890 3,251.09$ 11.5%

62351 Implant spinal canal cath 50.8484 3,560.20$ 52.7056 3,758.59$ 5.6%

62355 Remove spinal canal catheter 12.8874 902.32$ 12.0130 856.68$ -5.1%

62361 Implant spine infusion pump 192.8554 13,502.96$ 197.8775 14,111.24$ 4.5%

62362 Implant spine infusion pump 192.8554 13,502.96$ 197.8775 14,111.24$ 4.5%

62365 Remove spine infusion device 36.0096 2,521.25$ 34.7984 2,481.58$ -1.6%

62367 Analyze spine infus pump 2.3904 167.37$ 2.6879 191.68$ 14.5%

62368 Analyze sp inf pump w/reprog 2.3904 167.37$ 2.6879 191.68$ 14.5%

75809 Nonvascular shunt x-ray 1.0781 75.48$ 0.9933 70.84$ -6.1%

76000 Fluoroscope examination 1.2588 88.14$ 1.6023 114.26$ 29.6%

95990 Spin/brain pump refil & main 1.8088 126.64$ 2.0507 146.24$ 15.5%

95991 Spin/brain pump refil & main 1.8088 126.64$ 2.0507 146.24$ 15.5%

Page 12: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the ASC Final Rule

• 2013 Update– ASC payment rates will increase by 0.6 percent—the

projected rate of inflation of 1.4 percent minus a 0.8 percent productivity adjustment required by law.

– CMS projects that Medicare operating payments will increase about $310 million in CY 2013.

Pharmacy – Separately payable drugs are moving from current ASP +4%

to ASP+6%. The added 6% includes combined acquisition and pharmacy overhead.

Page 13: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

– $80 per day cost/packaging threshold for CY 2013. Current threshold is $70. Lioresal (J0475 & J0476) and Prialt (J2278) meet the cost threshold and are separately payable in the hospital outpatient site of service.

• Charge Compression– As discussed in the proposed rule, CMS finalized the use of

the new “implantable devices charged to patient” cost center to set payments under the OPPS. This was established in 2009 to reflect that hospitals typically mark-up higher-cost devices less than they mark-up lower cost devices. This results in approximately 6% of the payment increase for neurostimulator devices and implantable infusion pumps.

Page 14: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the ASC Final Rule

Spinal Cord Stimulation

•Reimbursement for neurostimulator insertion to increase of 8.1% to $15,431.

•Reimbursement for paddle lead insertion to increase 11% to $5,861.

•Reimbursement for percutaneous lead insertion to decrease slightly by 2.1% to $3,551.

Page 15: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the ASC Final Rule:Spinal Cord Stimulation

Spinal Cord Stimulation

CPT Description 2012 ASC 2013 ASC % Change 2012-201363650 Perc Lead Implant $3,628 $3,551 -2.1%63655 Lami Lead Implant $5,280 $5,861 11.0%63685 IPG Placement or Replacement $14,275 $15,431 8.1%63661 Removal of Perc Lead $846 $848 0.2%63662 Removal of Lami Lead $846 $848 0.2%63663 Revision or Replacement Perc Lead $3,628 $3,551 -2.1%63664 Revision or Replacement of Lami Lead $3,628 $3,551 -2.1%63688 Removal of IPG $1,251 $1,458 16.5%

Page 16: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Targeted Drug Delivery•Reimbursement for bolus/single day trials to increase 5% to $317.

•Reimbursement for continuous infusion/multiple day trials to decrease 7.7% to $481.

•Permanent catheter insertion to increase 8.2% to $1,824.

•Pump Insertion to increase 4.2% to $12,969.

Page 17: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the ASC Final Rule:Targeted Drug Delivery

CPT Description 2012 ASC 2013 ASC % Change 2012-201362311 Inject Spine (L/S) $302 $317 5.0%61319 Inject Spine with Catheter (L/S) $521 $481 -7.7%62350 Catheter Implant $1,685 $1,824 8.2%62362 Pump Implant, Programmable $12,441 $12,969 4.2%62355 Catheter Removal $521 $481 -7.7%62365 Removal of Pump $1,456 $1,392 -4.4%62367 Analysis of Pump $23 $18 -21.7%62368 Analysis and Programming of Pump $97 $77 -20.6%62370 Refill and Programming by Physician $97 $75 -22.7%

Page 18: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Medicare Physician Final Rule

• Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)– As in past years, CMS again indicates that the fee schedule conversion

factor will decline; for 2013 the decrease is set at 26.5%. (The conversion factor is used as the multiplier for the total relative value units (RVUs) to determine the payment for a procedure.)

– This decrease is required by the SGR formula, called for in Medicare statute, to calculate payment.

– Current expenditures are a component for the formula and since the SGR does not account for more Medicare beneficiaries, longer life spans, new technology, etc. negative updates are the result.

– Over the last ten years, CMS, Congress and the President have taken administrative and legislative steps eliminating conversion factor decreases. It is anticipated that additional legislative action will be taken in late 2012 or early 2013

Page 19: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Highlights of the Medicare Physician Final Rule

• Spinal Cord Stimulation Office Trials

– In the 2013 proposed rule, CMS reviewed SCS trialing performed in an office setting, also referred to as a non-facility setting. CMS stated that CPT code 63650 is frequently furnished in the office setting, but because there are no relative value units (RVUs) for the non-facility setting, it is not priced accordingly.

– CMS has proposed to establish values for 63650 in an office setting by combining the costs of trial leads as a non-facility direct practice expense (PE) input into the payment, and requested input from the AMA RVU update committee (RUC) and others to value the code appropriately.

– CMS states they will pay for trial leads in the office for 2013. It is unknown whether they will pay via 63650 and L8680, as is the current practice. The payment mechanism is not yet established.

Page 20: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

• Pharmacy

– Medicare has clarified that drugs used by a physician to refill an implantable pump to be within the “incident to” benefit category and not the DME benefit category. Therefore, the physician must buy and bill for the drug and a non-physician supplier that has shipped the drug to the physician’s office may not bill independently.

– Separately payable drugs continue to be reimbursed at ASP +6% The added 6% includes combined acquisition and pharmacy overhead.

Page 21: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Spinal Cord Stimulation – National Coverage Determination – Update

Tuesday 11/27/2012: CMS intent to review SCS National Coverage

Determination AHIP (America's Health Insurance Plans) proposed that

CMS review Implantable Pain Stimulators and the associated evidence to ensure that this is used as a last resort for non-malignant pain. (The current NCD mentions “late or last resort”.)

Page 22: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

CMS Potential NCD’s

On November 27, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) posted an updated list of 32 potential topics for future national coverage determinations (NCDs).

Implantable neurostimulators for chronic pain were listed amongst the many technologies on the list.

It is important to note that this technology already has a National Coverage Determination.

Page 23: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Epidural and Transforaminal Injections No NCD, only local coverage decisions in

place Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty

No NCD, only local coverage decisions in place

The last time CMS reviewed potential NCD topics was in 2008. Of the 20 topics listed, CMS acted on 7.

Page 24: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation
Page 25: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation
Page 26: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation
Page 27: Reimbursement issues: Neuromodulation

Questions??

[email protected]