Reguli Publicare ISI
38
Cap. 7 - Unde, ce si cum publicam? Lector: Victor VELTER-sef birou “Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie” UEFISCSU-CNCSIS BRASOV 13 noiembrie 2008
description
reguli
Transcript of Reguli Publicare ISI
Cap. 7 - Unde, ce si cum publicam?
Lector: Victor VELTER-sef birou “Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie”
UEFISCSU-CNCSIS
BRASOV
13 noiembrie 2008
Publicarea in reviste stiintifice de
specialitate
Unde publicam?
• pe plan intern (clasificare CNCSIS):
reviste categoria A
reviste categoria B+ reviste categoria Breviste categoria C reviste categoria D
www.cncsis.ro
Distributia revistelor (825) pe
categorii (2007)
11
102
227264
81
140
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
A B*(B si B+) C D NECLASATE
l
CATEGORIILE "CNCSIS" 2008-2010
I) Reviste recunoscute CNCSIS
• Categoria "A"-reviste cotate ISI
• Categoria "B+"-reviste indexate BDI (baze de date internaţionale)
• Categoria "B"-reviste cu punctaj de recunoaştere
II) Reviste fără punctaj de recunoaştere
• Categoria "C"-reviste cu potenţial de recunoaştere
• Categoria "D"-reviste în evidenţa CNCSIS
Unde publicam?
• pe plan extern:
-reviste cotate ISI
-reviste indexate BDI (Master Journal
List, Scopus, Engineering Village, Embase,
CH,…)
Baze de date cu rezumate
1. SCOPUS-16.000 reviste de la peste 4000 edituri
2. EV 2 (Compendex, Inspec, GeoBase)-reviste de inginerie si
stiinte exacte (bine reprezentate: geofizica, geologia)
3. EMBASE (include MEDLINE)-cateva mii de reviste medicale
4. CH –Chadwyck (PCI, LION, MLA)-stiinte umaniste, literatura,
lingvistica,...
“ISI”
• Institute of Scientific Information-Philadelphia
• Thomson Reuters: http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/
www.isinet.com
• ISI Web of Knowledge (Web of Science , ISI Proceedings, Journal Citation Reports, Derwent Innovations Index)
Dispute “ISI”
• revista cotata ISI vs. revista indexata ISI
• Web of Science vs. Master Journal List
MASTER JOURNAL LIST
• Arts & Humanities Citation Index® (Web of Science) (1228 reviste)
• BasicBIOSIS (379)
• Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index™ (479)
• Biological Abstracts (4251)
• BIOSIS PREVIEWS (4565)
• Biological Abstracts/RRM (316)
• Biotechnology Citation Index™ (283)
• Chemistry Citation Index™ (497)
• Current Contents® / Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences (1158)
• Current Contents® / Arts & Humanities (1146)
• Current Contents® / Clinical Medicine (1352)
• Current Contents® / Engineering, Computing & Technology (1224)
• Current Contents® / Life Sciences (1394)
• Current Contents® / Physical, Chemical & Earth Sciences (1248)
• Current Contents® / Social & Behavioral Sciences (1845)
• Current Contents Collections / Business Collection (235)
• Current Contents Collections / Electronics & Telecommunications Collection (195)
• Focus On / Sports Science & Medicine (91)
• Focus On / Veterinary Science & Medicine (170)
• Materials Science Citation Index® (565)
• Neuroscience Citation Index™ (347)
• Science Citation Index® (3734)
• Science Citation Index Expanded™ (Web of Science) (7.454)
• Social Sciences Citation Index® (Web of Science) (2239)
• Zoological Record (4606)
ISI in Romania
• Reviste romanesti cotate ISI (categoria A)
• Articole publicate in reviste cotate ISI cu
autori romani
CE PUBLICAM?
� Conference (proceeding) papers
� Full articles/Original articles
� Review papers/perspectives
� Meeting abstracts
Conference Paper
• Excellent for disseminating early or in-progress
research findings
• Typically 5-10 pages, 3 figures, 15 references
• Draft and submit the paper to conference
organisers
• Good way to start a scientific research career
Full Article
• Standard for disseminating completed research
findings
• Typically 8-10 pages, 5 figures, 25 references
• Draft and submit the paper to appropriate journal
• Good way to build a scientific research career
Review Paper
• Critical overview of a specific research topic
• Typically 10+ pages, 5+ figures, 80 references
• Typically solicited by journal editors
• Good way to consolidate a scientific research
career
Citation impact varies
by publication type
0
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Avera
ge c
ites p
er
item
(arb
. scale
)
Article Review Conference Paper Source:
Choose the target journal
� Choose one journal
� Your references can provide candidate journals
� Read recent publications in your field
� Find out specific journal details: • Is the journal peer-reviewed?
• Who is this journal’s audience?
• How long will it take to see your article in print?
• Is this a prestigious journal? (impact factor)
Journal X - 2007 Impact Factor (2008)
Cites in 2007 to articles published in Previous Two Years
2005 = 1166
2006 = 767
Total = 1933
Papers Published - Takes Previous two years, 2005 and 2006
2005 = 434
2006= 369
Total = 803
Calculation
Cites in 2007 to 2005 & 2006 Articles 1933
= = 2.407
Articles in 2005 & 2006 803
JCR Impact Factor CalculationJCR Impact Factor Calculation
Guide for Authors
1. Types of papers
2. Editorial team and contact info
3. Graphic considerations
4. Language accepted
5. Paper length
6. Details on keywords, color illustrations, proofs, etc.
–Apply the Guide for Authors to your manuscript, even to the first draft (text layout, paper citation, nomenclature, figures and table, etc ). It will save your time, and the editor’s.
What steps do I need to
take before I write my paper?1. Determine if you are ready to publish your work by analyzing the
significance of your achievements
2. Decide on the best type of manuscript: conference paper, full article,
review paper
3. Choose the target journal that is appropriate and has the right level
audience and prestige for your level of work
4. Check the Guide for Authors for your target journal and get details for
the manuscript preparation.
Why Is Language Important?
• Save your editor and reviewers the trouble
of guessing what you mean
Complaint from an editor:
“[This] paper fell well below my threshold. I refuse to
spend time trying to understand what the author is
trying to say. Besides, I really want to send a message
that they can't submit garbage to us and expect us to
fix it. My rule of thumb is that if there are more than 6
grammatical errors in the abstract, then I don't waste
my time carefully reading the rest.”
Scientific Language- Overview
• Write with clarity, objectivity, accuracy, and
brevity
• Key to successful scientific writing is to be alert
for common errors:
– Sentence construction
– Incorrect tenses
– Inaccurate grammar
– Not using English
Scientific Language – Sentences
• Write direct and short sentences
• One idea or piece of information per sentence is sufficient
• Avoid multiple statements in one sentence
Scientific Language - Tenses• Present tense for known facts and hypotheses:
“The average life of a honey bee is 6 weeks”
• Past tense for experiments you have conducted:
“All the honey bees were maintained in an environment with a consistent temperature of 23 degrees centigrade…”
• Past tense when you describe the results of an experiment:
“The average life span of bees in our contained environment was 8 weeks…”
Scientific Language - Grammar
• Use active voice to shorten sentences
– Passive voice: “It has been found that there had been…”
– Active voice: “We found that…”
– Passive voice: “carbon dioxide was consumed by the plant…”
– Active voice: “…the plant consumed carbon dioxide..”
• Avoid abbreviations: “it’s”, “weren’t”, “hasn’t”
– Never use them in scientific writing
– Only use abbreviations for units of measure
Scientific Language - Grammar• Minimize use of adverbs: “However”, “In addition”,
“Moreover”,“Furthermore”.
• Eliminate redundant phrases
Never say ‘and references therein’ - as in [1] and [25]. Any intelligent
reader knows to look at the references in a paper in order to get even more
information.” - Editor
Delete ‘In present report’. It is impossible for it to be in a different report!
You start the conclusions "In this report, we have prepared....." This is
nonsense. The samples were prepared in the laboratory!” -Editor
• Double-check unfamiliar words or phrases
Summary – How can I ensure I am using proper
scientific language?
• Proper scientific language is important so that editors and reviewers can easily understand your messages
• Refer to the journal’s Guide for Authors for specifications
• Check that your paper has short sentences, correct tenses, correct grammar, and is all in English
• Have a native English speaker/skilled writer check your manuscript
If the language prevents editors and reviewers from understanding the
scientific content of your work, at best publication will be delayed, at
worst never published.
General Structure of a Full Article
• Title
• Abstract
• Keywords
• Main text (IMRAD)
– Introduction
– Methods
– Results
– And
– Discussions
• Conclusion
• Acknowledgement
• References
• Supporting Materials
Make them easy for indexing and searching!
(informative, attractive, effective)
Journal space is precious. Make your article as brief
as possible.
Revision before submission
• One of the MOST important things before submission. You should make every attempt to make the manuscript as good as possible before submission.
• After you complete the first draft, take several days of rest. Refresh your brain with different things. And come back with critical eyes.
• Ask your colleague and supervisors review your manuscript first.
Your chance to speak to the editor directly
• Submitted along with your manuscript
• Mention what would make your manuscript special to the
journal
• Note special requirements (suggest reviewers, conflicts of
interest)
Cover Letter
Final approval
from all
authors
Explanation of
importance of
research
Suggested
reviewers
You are submitting your manuscript to a
scientific journal, not THROWING it out .
Please cherish your own achievements!
Revision after review
• Accompany the resubmission a letter of response to the reviewers’ comments. Address the comments for each reviewer and the Editor point by point.
• Cut and paste each comment, answer it directly below. Do not miss any point
• Identify where on the manuscript changes have been made (page and line number)
• You are encouraged to provide a convincing, solid and polite answer if you think a reviewer is wrong.
Remember: editors and reviewers hate to see the same
mistake twice!
Going to another journal
• If you want to submit the rejected manuscript to a
different journal, begin as if you are going to write a
new article.
– Please re-evaluate your work according to the comments
from the reviewers.
– Read the Guide for Authors
• Do not resubmit the rejected manuscript directly to
another journal without any significant revision! It
won’t save any of your time and energy.
Which procedure do you prefer?
1. Send out a sloppily prepared manuscript � get rejected after 4-6 months � send out again only a few days later � get rejected again � … � sink into despair
2. Take 3-4 months to prepare the manuscript � get the first decision after 4 months � revise carefully within time limitation �…� accepted
References
• http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/
• http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/index.html
• Petey Young. Writing and Presenting in English: The Rosetta Stone of Science. Elsevier 2006
• EDANZ Editing training materials. 2006
• http://www.cncsis.ro/evaluare_rev_ed.php
• www.isinet.com
INTREBARI?
