REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney...

20
REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International Municipal Lawyers Association 2008 Annual Conference

Transcript of REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney...

Page 1: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

REGULATINGDANGEROUS DOGS

TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN?

John D. Joye, Esq.Senior Assistant City Attorney

City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s OfficeInternational Municipal Lawyers Association

2008 Annual Conference

Page 2: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Headlines• Pit Bulls maul, kill boy in father’s Pit Bulls maul, kill boy in father’s

back yardback yard Charlotte Observer

• Father’s Pit Bulls maul Charlotte Boy Father’s Pit Bulls maul Charlotte Boy to death to death Los Angeles Times

• NC Boy killed by Father’s Pit Bulls NC Boy killed by Father’s Pit Bulls AP

• 4 Pitbulls kill Boy, 8 4 Pitbulls kill Boy, 8 Sunday Mirror, London, England

• Boy, 8, killed by dad’s dogs Boy, 8, killed by dad’s dogs Sunday Mercury, Birmingham, England

Page 3: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.
Page 4: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.
Page 5: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Can cities regulate dogs?

YESYESDogs = Property

No Fundamental Right

• Sentell v. New Orleans 1897

• Nicchia v. New York 1920

• Altman v. High Point 2003

• New York City Friends of Ferrets v. City of New York1995

Page 6: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

How will you regulate?

To Ban?

Breed Specific Legislation

“BSL”

Not to Ban?

Dog SpecificLegislation

“Non – BSL”

Page 7: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Breed Specific Ban

Does your state allow it?

• Ohio does it.

• 11 states forbid it.

• California• Colorado• Florida• Maine• Minnesota• New Jersey• New York• Oklahoma• Pennsylvania• Texas• Virginia

Page 8: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

HSUS Statement on Dangerous Dogs and Breed-Specific Legislation

The Humane Society of the United States offers the following position regarding breed-specific policies.The HSUS opposes legislation aimed at eradicating or strictly regulating dogs based solely on their breed for a number of reasons. Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is a common first approach that many communities take. Thankfully, once research is conducted most community leaders correctly realize that BSL won't solve the problems they face with dangerous dogs.There are over 4.5 million dog bites each year. This is an estimate as there is no central reporting agency for dog bites, thus breed and other information is not captured. Out of the millions of bites, about 10-20 are fatal each year. While certainly tragic, it represents a very small number statistically and should not be considered as a basis for sweeping legislative action….

Full statement available at www.hsus.org/pets/issues_affecting_our_pets/dangerous_dogs.html

Page 9: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

BSL: Issues & Pitfalls

Equal Protection– Over-breadth– Under-inclusive

Takings– Fair & just

compensation

Due Process– Substantive– Procedural

• Vagueness

No Fundamental

Right

Rational Relation Test

Page 10: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

EQUAL PROTECTION“[I]f the classification has some

reasonable basis, it does not offend the Constitution simply because the classification is not made with mathematical nicety or because the practice results in some inequality.”Dandridge v. Williams, (1970)

“The legislature may select one phase of one field and apply a remedy there, neglecting others.”Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc., (1955)

Page 11: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

TAKINGS

“Even were it assumed that dogs are property in the fullest sense of the word, they would still be subject to the police power of the state, and might be destroyed or otherwise dealt with…”Sentell v. New Orleans & C. R. Co., (1897)

• Limited Geographic Area

Page 13: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

DUE PROCESS

VAGUENESS

• Name

• Physical Characteristics

• Hybrids

PROCEDURAL

• Notice & Hearing

• Meaningful – prior to destruction

• Neutral fact-finder

Page 14: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Hard Questions / Hard Issues

• Which breeds to ban

• How do you define

• Ban vs. restrain

• Partial Ban + restrain

• Appeals / process

• Moving target

• Promote the breed

• Enforcement resources

• Humane Concerns

Page 15: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Fatalities v. Bites

ANNUAL DOG BITES

• 4.7 Million

• 800,000 victims seek medical attention– Half are children

• 386,000 require ER treatment

• Kids 5-9 highest rate of injury

D.B.R . FATALITY

• Apprx. 18 per year

• 2007 had apprx. 33

• Dog-Bite-Related Fatalities -- United States, 1995-1996

• Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998

• www.cdc.gov

Page 16: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Dog Specific

“Totality of Circumstances”

Dangerous  means any animal whose behavior, temperament, size, or any combination thereof, when considered under the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the surrounding area, constitutes a reasonable risk of injuring a human or animal or damaging personal or real property.Charlotte City Code §3-3

www.municode .com

Page 17: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Controls to Consider

Mechanisms

• Reporting

• Seizure

• Process

• Aggression training

• Multiple dogs

Toolbox

• Restraints

• Insurance

• Fertility

• Destruction

Page 18: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Animal Care & ControlResources

•Staffing

•Budget

•Dogs per year

•Volunteers

•Adoption

•Rendering

Page 19: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Resources

Page 20: REGULATING DANGEROUS DOGS TO BAN OR NOT TO BAN? John D. Joye, Esq. Senior Assistant City Attorney City of Charlotte – City Attorney’s Office International.

Q & A