Registry Support of Immunization Program Activities Lance Rodewald, M.D. Director Immunization...
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Registry Support of Immunization Program Activities Lance Rodewald, M.D. Director Immunization...
Registry Support of Registry Support of Immunization ProgramImmunization Program
ActivitiesActivitiesLance Rodewald, M.D.
Director
Immunization Services Division, NIP/CDC
Bill Brand, M.P.H.
Vice-President, American Immunization Registry Association
Immunization Grantee Requirements
• Population Assessment• Consumer Information• Program Management• Provider Quality
Assurance
• Registries • Service Delivery• Surveillance• Vaccine Management
Implement required and locally-identified
activities in eight core areas:
NIP/CDC Support
• Immunization Program Operations Manual (IPOM) – Grant guidance on required and recommended
activities – “Best practices” for an effective and
comprehensive immunization program
• Program Consultants in core program areas• Section 317 and VFC funding • Wide range of guidance documents,
trainings, print materials, etc.
Registries Within Immunization Programs
• Unique challenges for fully integrating registries with the rest of an immunization program:– Often separate funding sources– May be organizationally housed in a Medicaid
Program or Information Technology unit.– Historically often seen as an experimental and
unproven arm of an immunization program.
• Immunization registries are growing in both provider participation levels and in functionality.
• 44% of children now participate.• Focus to date has been on technical
standards and how a registry supports its external users.
• Little is available to guide a registry in supporting other core components of an immunization program. New standards are needed.
Current Situation
Potential benefits of new standards
• Greater integration and synergy across immunization program staff/teams.
• More efficient use of Section 317 and other funds.
• More fully functional registry applications.• More integrated, seamless registry support
of private providers and local health departments.
Registry Support for an Immunization Program –
The PROW Project
Purpose of the PROW Project
• To identify ways registries can effectively and integrally support the other core program components of an immunization program.
• To encourage and support adoption of those activities by all registries/ immunization programs.
Development of PROW Standards
• NIP contracted with the American Immunization Registry Association (AIRA)
• AIRA administered a survey of Immunization Program Managers and Registry Managers; conducted focus group with Program Managers.
• Convened national work group to draft standards.
• Now a collaborative project of AIRA and the Association of Immunization Managers (AIM).
Products of PROW
• Standards of Excellence in each of six program areas:– Vaccine Management– Provider Quality Assurance– Population Assessment– Consumer Information– Service Delivery– Surveillance
• Worksheet for self-assessment and planning.
Registries
Provider QA Vaccine Management
Assessment
Surveillance
Consumer Information
Service Delivery
Registry Support of Core Program Components
PROW Standards of Excellence
• Comparable to Best Practices• Standards as a ceiling to shoot for versus a
floor or set of minimum requirements• Concrete and tangible• Organized by Core Program Components• Cross-referenced to recommended activities
in the Immunization Program Operations Manual (NIP/CDC)
PROW Standards of Excellence
• Organized into three levels, from relatively easy to implement to challenging/resource intensive
• Useful for:– Identifying enhancements– Upgrading current applications – Developing requirements for a new
application or RFP
• Seen as an essential companion to minimum registry functions (NVAC), IPOM, and the new certification process.
Vaccine Management
PROW principle:
“Immunization registries provide users with information and functions that support proper storage and handling of vaccines, and internally can support management of the VFC program.”
Vaccine Management
• Level II:• Support a vaccine inventory feature capable
of adjusting doses due to wastage or transfer.
• Generate a doses administered or other report(s) to support vaccine accountability activities.
• Capture VFC eligibility status and generate annual reports.
Vaccine Management
• Level III:• Incorporate a feature that alerts users to lots
due to expire or already expired.• Incorporate a link to VACMAN for
automated ordering as supplies run low.• Incorporate a call-back feature for deferred
shots due to shortages.
Provider Quality Assurance
PROW principle:
“By enabling access to complete immunization records, registries support providers in delivering age-appropriate and timely immunizations, and in reducing under- and over-immunization.”
Provider Quality Assurance
• Level I:• Export to CASA or otherwise use registry
data as part of AFIX visits.• Use registry data to highlight general or
practice-specific practice issues that can be incorporated into provider trainings, newsletters, or a “tip-of-the-month” web link.
Note: Vital Records reported hospital Hep B1 to ALERT since Nov 1999
Source: Immunization ALERT (Oct 2000)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
02 05 08 11 14 17 20 23 28 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 01 04 07 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31
Nu
mb
er o
f C
hil
dre
n
Hep B given 0-56 days after birth
Hep B given 0-5 days after birth
Thimerosaland Hep B
T-free availablein Hospitals
T-free widelyavailable—VFC
Week1999 2000
Use of an Immunization Registry to Track Hepatitis B Immunization
Provider Quality Assurance
• Level II:• Highlight invalid doses when displaying a
history.• Use registry data to prioritize AFIX or VFC
site visits.• Use the registry to track series completion
for children born to surface antigen-positive moms.
Provider Quality Assurance
• Level III:• Be able to display the reason for an invalid
dose.• Include HBV and HBIG data fields in birth
records or other mechanisms, and regularly upload to the registry.
Inter-relatedness of new standards
• Such standards would complement and support existing standards and guidance:– Development of Community- and State-based
Immunization Registries (Approved by NVAC, January 1999)
– Minimum Functions for Immunization Registries (NIP/CDC, 2001)
– Core data set (NIP/CDC, 1995)– Voluntary registry certification (pending
approval)
What’s next for PROW?
• Disseminate Standards of Excellence • Peer learning/mentoring group • Best practices resource kit• Continual revising and growing of the
Standards based on their use and the growing maturity of registries.
• Potential role for NVAC
Proposed Resolution
The NVAC believes the growing maturity of immunization registries means they can play a greater and more integral role within an immunization program. In particular, NVAC believes registries can provide important support to other core program components, such as assessment, vaccine management, and provider quality assurance. Further, the NVAC believes the CDC should continue working with others to identify and disseminate best practices for registry support of an immunization program, such as those found in the Programmatic Registry Operations Workgroup Standards of Excellence.
For more information…
www.immregistries.orgoror
Bill BrandBill Brand
Minnesota Department of HealthMinnesota Department of Health
[email protected]@health.state.mn.us