Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract · 2020-06-18 · Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract...

Region 2 RAC2

Remedial Action Contract

Revised Draft Rl/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan Addendum No. 3,

Revised Remedial Investigation

Contract No.: EP-W-09-002 WA#: 040-RIC0-023J

Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Washington Township, New Jersey

November 12, 2014

CDMth Sm1

Revised Draft RI/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan Addendum No. 3, Revised Remedial Investigation

Revision Number: 0 November 12, 2014

Page i of ii


Table of Contents QAPP Worksheet #1 Title and Approval Page .............................................................................................. 1 QAPP Worksheet #2 QAPP Identifying Information ..................................................................................... 2 QAPP Worksheet #9 Soil Investigation Resampling Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet ................. 7 QAPP Worksheet #10 Problem Definition .................................................................................................... 8 QAPP Worksheet #11 Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements ...................... 9 QAPP Worksheet #14 Summary of Project Tasks ....................................................................................... 11 QAPP Worksheet #15 Reference Limits and Evaluation Tables .................................................................. 14 QAPP Worksheet #16 Project Schedule/Timeline Table ............................................................................ 37 QAPP Worksheet #17h Sampling Design and Rationale Revised Remedial Investigation .......................... 38 QAPP Worksheet #18 Sampling Locations and Methods/SOP Requirements Table .................................. 42 QAPP Worksheet #20 Field Quality Control Sample Summary Table ......................................................... 43

List of Tables Table 1 Summary of Sampling and Analysis Program Table 2 Soil Boring Summary

List of Figures Figure 1 Project Schedule Figure 2 Proposed Soil Boring Locations *Required TSOPs will be included in the field copy of the QAPP Addendum.*



Page ii of ii


INTRODUCTION CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM Smith) received Work Assignment 040‐RICO‐023J under the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2 Remedial Action Contract (RAC2) number EP‐W‐09‐002 to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) at the Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination (PVGWC) site, Operable Unit 3 (OU3) (the site). The OU3 RI field investigation was completed in April 2012. Supplemental sampling events were conducted in March 2013 to refine the extent of the contamination within the onsite properties. Because of concerns regarding the reliability of select analytical results for previously collected RI soil, groundwater, sediment and surface water samples, environmental samples are proposed to be re‐collected from previously sampled locations in support of the RI/FS and the associated risk assessments. Sampling locations include the Albea Americas, Inc. (Albea) property (formerly the American National Can property) and all the adjacent properties, including Warren Lumber Yard (WLY), Vikon Tile Corporation (VTC), Area of Concern 1 (AC 1) and the railroad right‐of‐way. This document is Addendum No.3 to the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for the Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) dated June 7, 2011, and documents the resampling soil investigation as outlined in the Work Plan Letter dated October 8, 2014 (CDM Smith 2014) and approved by EPA. The following tasks will be performed during the revised remedial investigation: Collection of soil samples from 4 deep soil borings beneath the Albea building in the area of the

former molding room and advanced to the water table (~125 feet [below ground surface] (bgs) using rota‐sonic drilling methods. Two soil samples will be collected from the initial 10 feet (0 to 2 and 5 to 7 feet) and then every 10 feet to depth based on field observations. Groundwater screening samples (GSS) will be collected from the deep water table, if field observations indicate contamination at or above the water table.

Collection of soil samples from 17 exterior deep soil borings on the Albea and adjacent properties (13 onsite, 1 background and 3 contingency) advanced to the water table or bedrock surface (~100‐125 feet bgs) using rota‐sonic drilling methods. Soil samples will be collected as described in the previous bullet, GSS will also be collected from the deep water table, if field observations indicate contamination at or above the water table.

Collection of soil samples from 24 (21 onsite and 3 contingency) exterior shallow soil borings within the drainage pathway on the Albea and adjacent properties, advanced to approximately 40 feet bgs using geo‐probe drilling methods. Soil samples will be collected as described in the first bullet. GSS will be collected from the perched groundwater.

This QAPP Addendum only addresses the field work listed above, and includes only those worksheets, tables, figures, and appendices that have been revised or added for the facility supplemental soil investigation. Information not included herein can be found in the June 2011 Final QAPP. The following is a list of the revised and added elements included in this QAPP Addendum No. 3: Worksheets #1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17h, 18, and 20 Table 1 Table 2 Figure 1 Figure 2

Prepared by:

Date:

Revised Draft Rl/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan Addendum No. 3, Revised Remedial Investigation


Page 1of43

QAPP Worksheet #1 Title and Approval Page

REVISED DRAFT Rl/FS QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) ADDENDUM NO. 3 for the

Revised Remedial Investigation Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3

Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/FS) Washington, New Jersey

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2

CDM Federal Programs Corporation (CDM Smith) 14 Wall Street, Suite 1702 New York, NY 10005 (212) 785-9123

November 12, 2014

CDM Smith Site Manager (SM):

Signature: ___ ~-~-~----------Edward Leonard, CHMM

CDM Smith Project Quality Assurance (QA) Manager:

Signature :_C_~+--+-~---1---r----. J~Mullins

CDM Smith Remedial Action Contract (RAC) 2 Program Manag { ,

EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM):

Signature: ______________ _ Michelle Granger

/ · EPA Region II Hazardous yvaste Support Section:

Signature : _______________ _ .. William Sy

CfnTith Pohatcong Va lley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3



Page 2 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #2 QAPP Identifying Information

Site Name/Project: Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund

Site, OU3 RI/FS Site Location: Washington, New Jersey Operable Unit: OU3 Contractor Name: CDM Smith Contractor Number: EP‐W‐09‐002 Contract Title: RAC Region 2 Work Assignment Number: 040‐RICO‐023J Document Control Number: 3323‐040‐02310 Guidance Used to Prepare QAPP: Requirements for QAPPs for Environmental Data Operation

QA/R5; Guidance for QAPPs, QA/G5; and Uniform Federal Policy for QAPPs Manual.

Regulatory program: Superfund Approval entity: EPA Region 2 Is QAPP generic or project‐specific: Project Specific: Revised Draft RI/FS QAPP Addendum No. 3 Dates of Scoping Sessions: A scoping conference call was held with EPA via teleconference

on September 17, 2014 regarding the revised remedial Investigation.

Dates and titles of QAPP documents written for previous site work: Final QAPP, Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3, June 7, 2011; Revised Final QAPP Addendum No. 1, Vapor Intrusion, Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3, March 22, 2013. Final QAPP Addendum No. 2, Facility Supplemental Soil Investigation, Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3, February 12, 2014. Organizational Partners (Stakeholders) and Connection with Lead Organization: United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) Date Users: CDM Smith, EPA Region 2 Required QAPP elements and required information that are not applicable to the project, explanation for their exclusion: Worksheets 3 through 8, 12, 13, 19, and 21 through 37 are included in the Final QAPP (CDM Smith 2011)



Page 3 of 43



Required QAPP Element(s) and Corresponding QAPP Section(s)

Required Information

QAPP Worksheet #/ Crosswalk to Required

Documents 2.1 Title and Approval Page ‐ Title and Approval Page 1 2.2 Document Format and Table of

Contents 2.2.1 Document Control

Format 2.2.2 Document Control

Numbering System 2.2.3 Table of Contents 2.2.4 QAPP Identifying

Information

‐ Table of Contents ‐ QAPP Identifying

Information

2

2.3 Distribution List and Project

Personnel Sign‐Off Sheet 2.3.1 Distribution List 2.3.2 Project Personnel Sign‐

Off Sheet

‐ Distribution List ‐ Project Personnel Sign Off

Sheet

Final QAPP (CDM Smith 2011)

2.4 Project Organization

2.4.1 Project Organizational Chart

2.4.2 Communication Pathways

2.4.3 Personnel Responsibilities and Qualifications

2.4.4 Special Training Requirements and Certification

‐ Project Organizational Chart

‐ Communication Pathways ‐ Personnel Responsibilities

and Qualifications Table ‐ Special Personnel Training

Requirements Table


2.5 Project Planning/Problem

Definition 2.5.1 Project Planning

(Scoping) 2.5.2 Problem Definition, Site

History, and Background

‐ Project Planning Session Documentation (including Data Needs tables)

‐ Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet

‐ Problem Definition, Site History, and Background

‐ Site Maps (historical and present)

Introduction 9

10

Figure 1

2.6 Project Quality Objectives and

Measurement Performance Criteria 2.6.1 Development of Project

Quality Objectives Using the Systematic Planning Process

2.6.2 Measurement Performance Criteria

‐ Site‐Specific PQOs - Measurement Performance Criteria Table

11




Page 4 of 43






Documents

– Sources of Secondary

Data and Information ‐ Secondary Data Criteria

and Limitations Table

Final QAPP (CDM Smith

2011)

2.8 Project Overview and Schedule

2.8.1 Project Overview 2.8.2 Project Schedule

‐ Summary of Project Tasks ‐ Reference Limits and

Evaluation Table ‐ Project Schedule/

Timeline Table

14 and Schedule 15

16

3.1 Sampling Tasks

3.1.1 Sampling Process Design and Rationale

3.1.2 Sampling Procedures and Requirements 3.1.2.1 Sampling

Collection Procedures

3.1.2.2 Sample Containers, Volume, and Preservation

3.1.2.3 Equipment/ Sample Containers Cleaning and Decontamination Procedures

3.1.2.4 Field Equipment Calibration, Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Procedures

3.1.2.5 Supply Inspection and Acceptance Procedures

3.1.2.6 Field Documentation Procedures

‐ Sampling Design and Rationale

‐ Sample Location Map ‐ Sampling Locations and

Methods/ SOP Requirements Table

‐ Analytical Methods/SOP Requirements Table

‐ Field Quality Control Sample Summary Table

‐ Sampling SOPs ‐ Project Sampling SOP

References Table ‐ Field Equipment

Calibration, Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Table

17h

18, Figure 1, Table 1


20


3.2 Analytical Tasks

3.2.1 Analytical SOPs 3.2.2 Analytical Instrument

Calibration Procedures

‐ Analytical SOPs ‐ Analytical SOP References

Table ‐ Analytical Instrument

Calibration Table


2011)



Page 5 of 43






Documents

3.2.3 Analytical Instrument and

Equipment Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Procedures

3.2.4 Analytical Supply Inspection and Acceptance Procedures

‐ Analytical Instrument and Equipment Maintenance, Testing, and Inspection Table

3.3 Sample Collection Documentation, Handling, Tracking, and Custody Procedures 3.3.1 Sample Collection

Documentation 3.3.2 Sample Handling and

Tracking System 3.3.3 Sample Custody

‐ Sample Collection Documentation Handling, Tracking, and Custody SOPs

‐ Sample Container Identification

‐ Sample Handling Flow Diagram

‐ Example Chain‐of‐Custody Form and Seal

18


3.4 Quality Control Samples

3.4.1 Sampling Quality Control Samples

3.4.2 Analytical Quality Control Samples

‐ QC Samples Table ‐ Screening/Confirmatory

Analysis Decision Tree

20 Final QAPP (CDM Smith

2011)

3.5 Data Management Tasks

3.5.1 Project Documentation and Records

3.5.2 Data Package Deliverables

3.5.3 Data Reporting Formats 3.5.4 Data Handling and

Management 3.5.5 Data Tracking and

Control

‐ Project Documents and Records Table

‐ Analytical Services Table ‐ Data Management SOPs


4.1 Assessments and Response

Actions 4.1.1 Planned Assessments 4.1.2 Assessment Findings and

Corrective Action Responses

‐ Assessments and Response Actions

‐ Planned Project Assessments Table

‐ Audit Checklists ‐ Assessment Findings and

Corrective Action Responses Table


2011)



Page 6 of 43






Documents 4.2 QA Management Reports ‐ QA Management Reports

Table Final QAPP (CDM Smith

2011) 4.3 Final Project Report Worksheet 14 and

Schedule 5.1 Overview 5.2 Data Review Steps

5.2.1 Step I: Verification 5.2.2 Step II: Validation

5.2.2.1 Step IIa Validation Activities

5.2.2.2 Step IIb

Validation Activities

5.2.3 Step III: Usability

Assessment 5.2.3.1 Data Limitations

and Actions from Usability Assessment

5.2.3.2 Activities

‐ Verification (Step I) Process Table

‐ Validation (Steps IIa and IIb) Process Table

‐ Validation (Steps IIa and IIb) Summary Table

‐ Usability Assessment




5.3 Streamlining Data Review

5.3.1 Data Review Steps To Be Streamlined

5.3.2 Criteria for Streamlining Data Review

5.3.3 Amounts and Types of Data Appropriate for Streamlining

None

Streamlining of Data Validation will not be

performed



Page 7 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #9 Soil Investigation Resampling Project Scoping Session Participants Sheet

Site Manager: Edward Leonard Site Name: Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, OU3 Site Location: Washington, New Jersey

Date of Session: September 17, 2014

Scoping Session Purpose: Presented scope of work for resampling event at site

Name Affiliation Phone Number E‐mail Address Project Role

Edward Leonard CDM Smith (732) 590‐4695 [email protected] Site Manager (SM)

Joseph Button CDM Smith (212) 377‐4389 [email protected] Task Manager

Michelle Granger EPA (212) 637‐4975 [email protected] EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM)

Kim O’Connell EPA (212) 637‐4399 [email protected] EPA Section Chief

Comments/Decisions: CDM Smith and EPA reviewed and discussed the proposed resampling scope. Modifications to scope included:

As confirmed with the EPA project risk assessor, other organics analyses are not needed at depth for the human health and ecological risk assessments. However, analysis of other organics is required to complete a full CERCLA RI. Therefore, the approach used in the original RI sampling approach (30 – 40% of samples analyzed for other organics) will be included in the resampling scope. All previous organics analyses will be resampled during this program.

Human Health Risk Assessment, Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment and RI Reports – EPA confirmed that all questionable organics data must be replaced with the new data. EPA also stated that a statement will be required in the introduction as to why the data was replaced, and CDM Smith should edit the text, tables and figures as necessary, re‐evaluate conclusions and recommendations and reissue new reports. Both draft and final version will be prepared.

FS Report ‐ After validation of resampling data, all recently collected data (RI resampling, supplemental sampling and vapor intrusion (VI) data related to investigation, remediation and Operations & Maintenance data) will be re‐evaluated and a meeting to determine how to move forward on the FS will be convened.

Access Agreements –EPA requested CDM Smith provide a status of the access agreements, including a summary of actions needed for resampling access. EPA to contact Office of Regional Counsel to move access forward as soon as possible.

Action Items: Upon finalizing the work plan letter, CDM Smith will coordinate with the facility owner to discuss access. An additional logistics/coordination meeting will be held with the facility owner prior to mobilization.



Page 8 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #10 Problem Definition

Problem Summary Concerns regarding the reliability of all organic (VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and pesticides) analytical results for soil, groundwater, sediment and surface water previously received in conjunction with the RI/FS, environmental samples are proposed to be re‐collected from previously sampled soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment locations in support of the RI/FS and the associated risk assessments. Project Description The investigation will include soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment sampling in and around the Albea Americas, Inc. (Albea) property (formerly the American National Can property (ANC)) and all the adjacent properties, including Warren Lumber Yard (WLY), Vikon Tile Corporation (VTC), Area of Concern 1 (AC 1) and the railroad right‐of‐way. Project Decision Conditions Soil field screening data (from a photo ionizing detector) and quick turnaround time analytical results will be evaluated and reviewed with EPA throughout the program to determine if additional sampling is required to refine the extent of contamination of soils at the site. Three deep and three shallow contingency borings are built into the program to be used if additional sampling is needed.



Page 9 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #11

Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements But half the overall project objectives The revised RI will include soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment sampling below, adjacent to and in the drainage areas surrounding the Albea facility for the analyses presented below to replace unreliable date provided in the previous remedial investigation. Who will use the data? EPA and CDM Smith will use the data. What type of data are needed? The sampling program will include the following:

Soil o Shallow Soil Samples: Trace level TCL VOCs by SOM01.2 (with a 7‐day turnaround time [TAT] for the onsite samples).

TLC SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Facility Soil Samples: TCL VOCs by SOM01.2 (with 48‐hour TAT) TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Exterior Soil Borings: TCL VOCs SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Groundwater

o Shallow Soil Borings: Trace level TCL VOCs SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Facility Soil Borings: Trace level TCL VOCs SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Surface Water: TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Sediment: TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT) What will the data be used for? Data will be used to replace unreliable data reported in previous remedial investigation. How “good” do the data need to be in order to support the environmental decision? Definitive level data required to support project decisions and risk assessments. The project action limits and quantitation limits for soil VOCs are specified on Worksheet #15. All laboratory analyses will be performed in compliance with EPA’s Field and Analytical Services Teaming Advisory Committee policy. Preference will be given in the



Page 10 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #11

Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements following order: EPA’s Region 2 Division of Environmental Science and Assessment (DESA) laboratory, an EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) laboratory, or a CDM Smith subcontract laboratory. Data must meet the data quality objectives that have been specified for the site. Where, when, and how should the data be collected? The samples will be collected from locations shown on Figure 2. Worksheet #17h and Table 1 presents the sampling program design, rationale, sampling procedures and analytical parameters. Locational data will be documented by hand measurement from known interior features. Who will collect and generate the data? CDM Smith will collect the analytical samples that will be shipped to DESA, CLP, and/or CDM Smith’s subcontract laboratory for analysis.

How will the data be reported? Validated analytical data will be downloaded from EPA’S website or forwarded to CDM Smith from a subcontract laboratory for evaluation and use in the Supplemental Investigation Report and FS. Analytical data generated by a laboratory under subcontract to CDM Smith will be received in electronic and hard copy and validated by CDM Smith personnel. Following completion of all laboratory analysis and receipt of all electronic and hard‐copy data, the Supplemental Investigation Report will be generated by CDM Smith and submitted to EPA with tabulated data. CDM Smith will use global information system (GIS) to facilitate spatial analysis of data to generate figures for reports and presentations. How will the data be archived?

Data from a subcontract laboratory will be received in EPA Region 2 electronic format and validated Final DESA or CLP validated data will be submitted to CDM Smith in electronic format and hard copy Electronic data will be input into the project's EQuIS database EPA will archive CLP laboratory raw data Hard copies of analytical data received by CDM Smith will be archived in the project files for 10 years after contract expiration



Page 11 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #14 Summary of Project Tasks

Sampling Tasks: Sampling tasks are summarized on Table 1 and 2 below: Analysis Tasks: See Table 1 Quality Control Tasks: Field blanks and field duplicates will be collected as described on Worksheet #20. MS/MSDs will be collected if samples are assigned to the DESA laboratory. Secondary Data: Secondary data listed in Worksheet #13 in the Final QAPP (June 2011) and results from the 2013 Supplemental Soil Sampling event and the 2013 vapor intrusion sampling event were reviewed and used to plan sample locations. These results were added to the project database. These data were validated and found to be useful for its intended use. Only valid data were included in the data evaluation. Data Management Tasks: Analytical data will be imported into the Environmental Quality Information Systems (EQuIS) database after validation. Field measurements will also be added to the database.

All final laboratory data will be submitted to CDM Smith in electronic format consistent with CLP deliverables. The Analytical Service Coordinator (ASC) will review all analytical data.

Hard copies of analytical data received by CDM Smith will be archived in project file. Electronic data will be uploaded into the CDM Smith Database system. Electronic data will be consistent with EPA Region 2 requirements for electronic data deliverable (EDDs). Electronic analytical data will be archived on CDs and copies of CDs will be forwarded to the EPA.

CDM Smith’s Field Team Leader is responsible for tracking all samples from the point of collection to shipment for laboratory analysis. The data coordinator is responsible for tracking samples from shipment for laboratory analysis to the subsequent data validation and data management efforts. The sample handling and custody requirements, including field log books and generation of sample paperwork, sample labels, and custody seals discussed in Worksheets #26 and #27 of Final QAPP (June 2011), will be followed according to TSOP 1‐2. The analytical services coordinator (ASC) or data coordinator will receive non‐routine analytical services (non‐RAS) data from the laboratory(s) and will track it through the data validation process. For non RAS data, the ASC will submit the electronic “Analytical Services Tracking System Data Requirement” form (Appendix C of Final QAPP [June 2011]) to the Regional Sample Control Center by the first day of each month for the previous month’s sampling.



Page 12 of 43



CDM Smith will be responsible for tracking and maintaining custody of the laboratory data packages through the data validation process. Data validation will be in accordance with the procedures described in Worksheets #35 and #36 of the RAC2 Region 2 Generic QAPP (December 2013). Once the data is validated, it will be input into CDM Smith’s database.

A project electronic spreadsheet using Scribe software will be developed for sample tracking purposes prior to field activities. The tracking system will be initiated in the field during sample collection and will be updated during the sample analysis and data validation phases. The data will be entered by project staff and then checked by the data coordinator for accuracy and to document changes to sample locations or samples which are not collected due to field conditions. This tracking system will ensure that no data is lost during the data management process. The following information is recorded in the tracking system:

Area of Concern (sample location area) Sample Matrix SDG Number CLP Case No. CLP No. Analytical Parameter Collection Date Shipment Date

Sample Number Date Received from Lab Date Submitted for Data Validation Name of Data Validator Date of Data Validation Completion Database Entry Date Database QC Date Comments (i.e., duplicate samples).

Analytical data collected during the field effort will be entered into EQuIS. This data management system will also include location data. The database management system will provide data storage, retrieval, and analytical capabilities. The system will be used to support report preparation by providing data users the data they need to complete their work using spreadsheets, word processing, statistical, and graphics software. To facilitate the use of the database, CDM Smith will provide subcontract laboratories with the specifications for the EPA Region 2 analytical data EDD. Once it is uploaded into the database, validated analytical data will be used in the data evaluation phase. A 100 percent quality control check will be performed to ensure accuracy on all hand‐entered data (i.e., data qualifiers added by CDM Smith validators on subcontract laboratory data, sample field notations). Data tables that present the results of the sampling program will be prepared and compared to applicable screening criteria. Graphics and GIS software will be used to present sample results and illustrate contaminants detected.



Page 13 of 43



As a quality control check, reports, tables, and graphical figures will be compared to source material from the database to check for errors and omissions. CDM Smith will provide EPA with final analytical data as part of the Region 2 EDD requirement. The EQuIS data base system will be the primary data management system software. This software is managed on CDM Smith’s computer network in compliance with software licensing requirements. Access to the project database is limited to authorized personnel only via their computer. CDM Smith will take reasonable care to protect the data and will perform periodic backups to prevent wholesale loss of project data. Control of the computer hardware and software will be as per CDM Smith’s quality procedure 4.1. After CLP data is validated, the package is returned to the EPA regional project manager. The original CLP data packages with all associated forms are retained by EPA for archival. Non‐CLP data packages received from a laboratory subcontractor will be validated by CDM Smith’s ASC or designee. These packages are stored in electronic format on CDM Smith’s computer network where they are accessible to the project manger and other team members. Copies of the non‐CLP data packages, in electronic format, will be submitted to EPA (as directed) during project close‐out. Documentation and Records: Information regarding samples will be recorded in site field logs. Any changes that are made to the field logs shall be initialed and dated. Documents will be maintained in the project files and/or the RAC 2 document control system. Chain‐of‐Custody (COC) forms and FedEx air bills will also be completed for the sampling event. The results of this field investigation will be presented in the Revised Remedial Investigation Report (RRIR).

Revised Draft RI/FS Quality Assurance Project Plan Addendum No. 3,


Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 14 of 43

Federal

EPA National Primary

Drinking Water

Standards (1)

NJDEP

Groundwater

Quality Standards

Class IIA Water

(2)

NJDEP

Drinking

Water

Standards

(3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Trace

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low

MDLs QLs

1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 71‐55‐6 200 30 30 30 10 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 79‐34‐5 NL 1 1 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane 76‐13‐1 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 79‐00‐5 5 3 3 3 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1‐Dichloroethane 75‐34‐3 NL 50 50 50 17 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1‐Dicholoroethene 75‐35‐4 7 1 2 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 87‐61‐6 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 120‐82‐1 70 9 9 9 3 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 96‐12‐8 0.2 0.02 0.2 0.02 0.50 N/A 0.05 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromoethane 106‐93‐4 0.1 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.50 N/A 0.05 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 95‐50‐1 600 600 600 600 200 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloroethane 107‐06‐2 5 2 2 2 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloropropane 78‐87‐5 5 1 5 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 541‐73‐1 NL 600 600 600 200 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 106‐46‐7 75 75 75 75 25 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,4‐Dioxane 123‐91‐1 NL 10 NL 10 10 N/A NL NL 100 Trace N/A N/A

2‐Butanone 78‐93‐3 NL 300 NL 300 100 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

2‐Hexanone 591‐78‐6 NL 300 NL 300 100 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 108‐10‐1 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

Acetone 67‐64‐1 NL 6000 NL 6000 2000 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

Benzene 71‐43‐2 5 1 1 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromochloromethane 74‐97‐5 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromodichloromethane 75‐27‐4 80 1 80 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromoform 75‐25‐2 80 4 80 4 1.33 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromomethane 74‐83‐9 NL 10 NL 10 3.33 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Carbon Disulfide 75‐15‐0 NL 700 NL 700 233 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Carbon tetrachloride 56‐23‐5 5 1 2 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chlorobenzene 108‐90‐7 100 50 50 50 17 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloroethane 75‐00‐3 NL 5 NL 5 1.67 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloroform 67‐66‐3 80 70 80 70 23 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloromethane 74‐87‐3 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

cis‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐59‐2 70 70 70 70 23 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

cis‐1,3‐Dichloropropene + 10061‐01‐5 NL 1 NL 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Cyclohexane 110‐82‐7 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Dibromochloromethane 124‐48‐1 80 1 80 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75‐71‐8 NL 1000 NL 1000 333 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Ethylbenzene 100‐41‐4 700 700 700 700 233 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Isopropylbenzene 98‐82‐8 NL 700 NL 700 233 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

m, p‐Xylene * 1330‐20‐7 10,000 1000 1000 1000 333 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methyl acetate 79‐20‐9 NL 7000 NL 7000 2333 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methyl tert‐butyl ether 1634‐04‐4 NL 70 70 70 23 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methylcyclohexane 108‐87‐2 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methylene chloride 75‐09‐2 5 3 3 3 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

o‐Xylene ** 1330‐20‐7 10,000 1000 1000 1000 333 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

MDLsProject Selected

Option

Achievable Laboratory

Limits***New Jersey

Project Action Limit (PAL)

QAPP Worksheet #15g

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Groundwater VOCs

CAS NumberVolatile Organic Compounds

(All units: μg/L)

Project Quantitation Limit Goal (PQLG)****

CRQL

Analytical Method

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 15 of 43

Federal

EPA National Primary

Drinking Water

Standards (1)

NJDEP

Groundwater

Quality Standards

Class IIA Water

(2)

NJDEP

Drinking

Water

Standards

(3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Trace

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low

MDLs QLsMDLs

Project Selected Option


Limits***New Jersey


QAPP Worksheet #15g



(All units: μg/L)

Project Quantitation Limit Goal (PQLG)****

CRQL

Analytical Method

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)

Styrene 100‐42‐5 100 100 100 100 33 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Tetrachloroethene 127‐18‐4 5 1 1 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Toluene 108‐88‐3 1,000 600 1000 600 200 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐60‐5 100 100 100 100 33 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

trans‐1,3‐Dichloropropene + 10061‐02‐6 NL 1 NL 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Trichloroethene 79‐01‐6 5 1 1 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Trichlorofluoromethane 75‐69‐4 NL 2000 NL 2000 667 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Vinyl Chloride 75‐01‐4 2 1 2 1 0.50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 16 of 43

1. EPA National Primary Drinking Water Standards (web page http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/index.html),

EPA 816‐F‐03‐016, June 2003. last updated November 28, 2006.

2. New Jersey Ground Water Quality Standards Class IIA (NJAC 7:9C), July 7, 2008, downloaded November 13, 2008

3. New Jersey Drinking Water Standards, February 2005 (http://www.state.nj.us/dep/watersupply/standard.htm), downloaded November 13, 2008

+ 1,3‐dichloropropene criteria was used for cis‐ and trans‐1,3‐dichloropropene criteria.

* m‐xylene and p‐xylene reported as one compound under S0M01.2. Xylene (total) was used for m,p‐xylene criteria.

** Xylene (total) was used for o‐xylene criteria.

***The laboratory is TBD. CDM Smith will implement the EPA Region 2 FASTAC policy for obtaining analytical services.

See Appendix C for DESA information regarding this worksheet.

EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency NJDEP = New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

CAS = Chemical abstract service SIM = selective ion monitoring

CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit TOGS = Technical and Operational Guidance Series

MA = modified analyses c = based on carcinogenic target risk criteria

MDL = method detection limit n = based on noncancer hazard index criteria

N/A = Not Applicable

NL = Not Listed or chemical name listed but no value available

PAL= Project Action Limit

μg/L = micrograms per liter


Notes for QAPP Worksheet #15g

**** Highlighted analytes have PQLGs that may not be acheivable using standard laboratory analyses. CDM Smith will utilize nominal CRQLs as available rather than using modified analyses for these analytes as the nominal CRQLs will not impact the projects data quality objectives.




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 17 of 43

Federal

EPA National

Recommended

Water Quality

Criteria (1)

NJDEP Surface

Water Quality

Criteria for Fresh

Water (Chronic) (2)

NJDEP Surface

Water Quality

Criteria for Fresh

Water (Human

Health) (2)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

Water by SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

Water

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low

Water

MDLs QLs

1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 71‐55‐6 NL NL 120 11 4 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 79‐34‐5 4 NL 4.7 4.7 2 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane 76‐13‐1 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 79‐00‐5 16 NL 13 13 4 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1‐Dichloroethane 75‐34‐3 NL NL NL 47 16 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,1‐Dicholoroethene 75‐35‐4 7100 NL 4.7 4.7 2 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 87‐61‐6 NL NL NL 8 3 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 120‐82‐1 70 NL 21 21 7 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 96‐12‐8 NL NL NL NL NL N/A 0.05 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromoethane 106‐93‐4 NL NL NL NL NL N/A 0.05 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 95‐50‐1 1300 NL 2000 0.7 0.7 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloroethane 107‐06‐2 37 NL 0.29 0.29 0.29 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloropropane 78‐87‐5 15 NL 0.5 0.5 0.5 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 541‐73‐1 960 NL 2200 150 50 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 106‐46‐7 190 NL 550 26 9 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

1,4‐Dioxane 123‐91‐1 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL NL 100 Trace N/A N/A

2‐Butanone 78‐93‐3 NL NL NL 14000 4667 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

2‐Hexanone 591‐78‐6 NL NL NL 99 33 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 108‐10‐1 NL NL NL 170 57 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

Acetone 67‐64‐1 NL NL NL 1500 500 N/A NL 5 10 Trace N/A N/A

Benzene 71‐43‐2 51 NL 0.15 0.15 0.15 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromochloromethane 74‐97‐5 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromodichloromethane 75‐27‐4 17 NL 0.55 0.55 0.55 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromoform 75‐25‐2 140 NL 4.3 4.3 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Bromomethane 74‐83‐9 1500 NL 47 47 16 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Carbon Disulfide 75‐15‐0 NL NL NL 0.92 0.9 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Analytical Method

New Jersey

Project Action

Limit (PAL)

QAPP Worksheet #15hReference Limits and Evaluation Table - Surface Water VOCs

Project Quantitation Limit Goal (PQLG)***



(All units: μg/L)MDLs



Limits **CRQL




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 18 of 43

Federal

EPA National

Recommended

Water Quality

Criteria (1)

NJDEP Surface

Water Quality

Criteria for Fresh

Water (Chronic) (2)

NJDEP Surface

Water Quality

Criteria for Fresh

Water (Human

Health) (2)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

Water by SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Trace

Water

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low

Water

MDLs QLs

Analytical Method

New Jersey

Project Action

Limit (PAL)

QAPP Worksheet #15hReference Limits and Evaluation Table - Surface Water VOCs




(All units: μg/L)MDLs



Limits **CRQL

Carbon tetrachloride 56‐23‐5 1.6 NL 0.33 0.33 0.33 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chlorobenzene 108‐90‐7 1600 NL 210 1.3 1.3 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloroethane 75‐00‐3 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloroform 67‐66‐3 470 NL 68 1.8 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Chloromethane 74‐87‐3 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

cis‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐59‐2 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Cyclohexane 110‐82‐7 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Dibromochloromethane 124‐48‐1 13 NL 0.4 0.4 0.4 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75‐71‐8 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Ethylbenzene 100‐41‐4 2100 NL 530 90 30 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Isopropylbenzene 98‐82‐8 NL NL NL 2.6 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methyl acetate 79‐20‐9 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methyl tert‐butyl ether 1634‐04‐4 NL NL 70 70 23 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methylcyclohexane 108‐87‐2 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Methylene chloride 75‐09‐2 590 NL 2.5 2.5 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Styrene 100‐42‐5 NL NL NL 72 24 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Tetrachloroethene 127‐18‐4 3.3 NL 0.34 0.34 0.34 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Toluene 108‐88‐3 15000 NL 1300 2 1 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐60‐5 10000 NL 590 590 197 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Trichloroethene 79‐01‐6 30 NL 1 1 1.0 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Trichlorofluoromethane 75‐69‐4 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Vinyl Chloride 75‐01‐4 2.4 NL 0.082 0.082 0.082 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A

Xylene (total)* 1330‐20‐7 NL NL NL 13 4 N/A NL 0.5 5 Trace N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 19 of 43

Federal CRQL

EPA National

Recommend

ed Water

Quality

Criteria (1)

NJDEP

Surface

Water

Quality

Criteria for

Fresh Water

(Chronic) (2)

NJDEP

Surface

Water

Quality

Criteria for

Fresh Water

(Human

Health) (2)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Water

MDLs QLs

Aroclor‐1016 12674‐11‐2 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1221 11104‐28‐2 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1232 11141‐16‐5 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1242 53469‐21‐9 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1248 12672‐29‐6 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1254 11097‐69‐1 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1260 11096‐82‐5 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1262 37324‐23‐5 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1268 11100‐14‐4 0.000064 0.014 0.000064 0.000064 0.000064 N/A 1 N/A N/A

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)


New Jersey

Analytical Method Achievable Laboratory

Limits**

MDLs

QAPP Worksheet #15i

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Surface Water Aroclors

Aroclors (All units: μg/L) CAS Number

Project Action Limit




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 20 of 43

Federal CRQL

EPA National

Recommend

ed Water

Quality

Criteria (1)

NJDEP

Surface

Water

Quality

Criteria for

Fresh Water

(Chronic) (2)

NJDEP Surface

Water Quality

Criteria for

Fresh Water

(Human

Health) (2)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Water

MDLs QLs

4,4'‐DDD 72‐54‐8 0.00031 0.001 0.00031 0.00031 0.00031 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDE 72‐55‐9 0.00022 0.001 0.00022 0.00022 0.00022 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDT 50‐29‐3 0.00022 0.001 0.00022 0.00022 0.00022 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Aldrin 309‐00‐2 0.00005 3 0.000049 0.000049 0.000049 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

alpha‐BHC 319‐84‐6 0.0049 NL 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

alpha‐Chlordane 5103‐71‐9 0.00081 0.0043 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

beta‐BHC 319‐85‐7 0.017 NL 0.0091 0.0091 0.0091 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

delta‐BHC 319‐86‐8 NL NL NL 141 47 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

Dieldrin 60‐57‐1 0.000054 0.056 0.000052 0.000052 0.000052 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Endosulfan I 959‐98‐8 89 0.056 62 0.056 0.056 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

Endosulfan II 33213‐65‐9 89 0.056 62 0.056 0.056 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Endosulfan sulfate 1031‐07‐8 89 NL 62 62 20 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Endrin 72‐20‐8 0.06 0.036 0.059 0.036 0.036 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Endrin aldehyde 7421‐93‐4 0.3 NL 0.059 0.059 0.059 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

Endrin ketone 53494‐70‐5 NL NL NL NL NL N/A 0.1 N/A N/A

gamma‐BHC (Lindane) 58‐89‐9 1.8 0.95 0.98 0.95 0.316666667 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

gamma‐Chlordane 5103‐74‐2 0.00081 0.0043 NL 0.00081 0.00081 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

Heptachlor 76‐44‐8 0.000079 0.0038 0.000079 0.000079 0.000079 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

Heptachlor epoxide 1024‐57‐3 0.0038 0.0038 0.000039 0.000039 0.000039 N/A 0.05 N/A N/A

Methoxychlor 72‐43‐5 NL 0.03 40 0.03 0.03 N/A 0.5 N/A N/A

Toxaphene 8001‐35‐2 0.0002 0.0002 0.00028 0.0002 0.0002 N/A 5 N/A N/A


QAPP Worksheet #15j

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Surface Water Pesticides

Pesticides (All units: μg/L) CAS Number


New Jersey

MDLs

Analytical Method Achievable Laboratory

Limits**

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 21 of 43

Source:1 EPA 2009. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Criteria based on Freshwater CCC (chronic) values.

http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/wqctable/. Note several values for metals will be adjusted based on site specific water hardness.2 NJDEP Surface Water Quality Standards. (web page http://www.nj.gov/dep/rules/rules/njac7_9b.pdf). April 2011.

* m‐xylene and p‐xylene reported as one compound under S0M01.2. The RSL is based on m‐xylene.

**The laboratory is TBD. CDM Smith will implement the EPA Region 2 FASTAC policy for obtaining analytical services.

Notes:

µg/L ‐ microgram per liter

mg/L ‐ milligram per liter

EPA ‐ Environmental Protection Agency

NJDEP ‐ New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

NL ‐ not listed

NRWQC ‐ National Recommended Water Quality Criteria

RI ‐ remedial investigation

Notes for QAPP Worksheet #15h‐jReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Surface Water

***Highlighted analytes have PQLGs that may not be achievable using standard laboratory analyses. CDM Smith will utilize nominal CRQLs as available rather than using modified analyses for these analytes as the nominal CRQLs will not impact the projects data quality objectives.




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 22 of 43

CRQL

EPA

EcoSSLs

(1)

Soil PRGs

(3)

NJDEP Non‐

Residential Direct

Contact Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default Impact

to Groundwater Soil

Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low Soil

MDLs QLs

1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 71‐55‐6 NL 640,000 NL 4,200,000 200 29,800 200 67 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 79‐34‐5 NL 560 NL 3,000 5 127 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane 76‐13‐1 NL 910,000 NL NL NL NL 910,000 303,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 79‐00‐5 NL 160 NL 6,000 10 28,600 10 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1‐Dichloroethane 75‐34‐3 NL 3,300 NL 24,000 200 20,100 200 67 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1‐Dicholoroethene 75‐35‐4 NL 24,000 NL 150,000 5 8,280 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 87‐61‐6 NL 4,900 20,000 NL NL 20,000 4,900 1,633 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 120‐82‐1 NL 6,200 20,000 820,000 400 20,000 400 133 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 96‐12‐8 NL 5 NL 200 5 35 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromoethane 106‐93‐4 NL 34 NL 40 5 1,230 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 95‐50‐1 NL 190,000 NL 59,000,000 11,000 2,960 2,960 987 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloroethane 107‐06‐2 NL 430 NL 3,000 5 21,200 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloropropane 78‐87‐5 NL 940 NL 5,000 5 32,700 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 541‐73‐1 NL NL NL 59,000,000 12,000 37,700 12,000 4,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 106‐46‐7 NL 2,400 20,000 13,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,4‐Dioxane 123‐91‐1 NL 4,900 NL NL NL NL 4,900 1,633 N/A 100 N/A N/A

2‐Butanone 78‐93‐3 NL 2,800,000 NL 44,000,000 600 89,600 600 200 N/A 10 N/A N/A

2‐Hexanone 591‐78‐6 NL 21,000 NL NL NL 12,600 12,600 4,200 N/A 10 N/A N/A

4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 108‐10‐1 NL 2,200,000 NL NL NL 443,000 443,000 147,667 N/A 10 N/A N/A

Acetone 67‐64‐1 NL 6,100,000 NL NA 12,000 2,500 2,500 833 N/A 10 N/A N/A

Benzene 71‐43‐2 NL 1,100 NL 5,000 5 255 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromochloromethane 74‐97‐5 NL 16,000 NL NL NL NL 16,000 5,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromodichloromethane 75‐27‐4 NL 270 NL 3,000 5 540 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromoform 75‐25‐2 NL 62,000 NL 280,000 20 15,900 20 7 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromomethane 74‐83‐9 NL 730 NL 59,000 30 235 30 10 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Carbon Disulfide 75‐15‐0 NL 82,000 NL 110,000,000 4,000 94 94 31 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Carbon tetrachloride 56‐23‐5 NL 610 NL 2,000 5 2,980 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chlorobenzene 108‐90‐7 NL 29,000 40,000 7,400,000 400 40,000 400 133 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloroethane 75‐00‐3 NL 1,500,000 NL 1,100,000 NA NL 220,000 73,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloroform 67‐66‐3 NL 290 NL 2,000 200 1,190 200 67 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloromethane 74‐87‐3 NL 12,000 NL 12,000 NA 10,400 4,000 1,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

cis‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐59‐2 NL 16,000 NL 560,000 200 NL 200 67 N/A 5 N/A N/A

cis‐1,3‐Dichloropropene + 10061‐01‐5 NL 1,700 NL 7,000 5 398 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Cyclohexane 110‐82‐7 NL 120,000 NL NL NL NL 120,000 40,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Dibromochloromethane 124‐48‐1 NL 680 NL 8,000 5 2,050 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75‐71‐8 NL 9,400 NL 230,000,000 25,000 39,500 25,000 8,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Ethylbenzene 100‐41‐4 NL 5,400 NL 110,000,000 8,000 5,160 5,160 1,720 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Isopropylbenzene 98‐82‐8 NL 260,000 NL NL NL NL 260,000 86,667 N/A 5 N/A N/A

EPA Regional

Screening Level

(2)

Volatile Organic Compounds

(All units: μg/kg)


Achievable

Laboratory

Limits**

Project Action

Limit (PAL)

Ecological Action

Limit


New Jersey

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil VOCsQAPP Worksheet #15k

CAS Number

Analytical Method

MDLs

Federal

Final Quality Assurance Project Plan Addendum No. 2



Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 23 of 43

CRQL

EPA

EcoSSLs

(1)

Soil PRGs

(3)

NJDEP Non‐

Residential Direct

Contact Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default Impact

to Groundwater Soil

Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2 Low Soil

MDLs QLs

EPA Regional

Screening Level

(2)


(All units: μg/kg)


Achievable

Laboratory

Limits**

Project Action

Limit (PAL)

Ecological Action

Limit


New Jersey

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil VOCsQAPP Worksheet #15k

CAS Number

Analytical Method

MDLs

Federal

Methyl acetate 79‐20‐9 NL 7,800,000 NL NA 14,000 NL 14,000 4,667 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methyl tert‐butyl ether 1634‐04‐4 NL 43,000 NL 320,000 200 NL 200 67 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methylcyclohexane 108‐87‐2 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methylene chloride 75‐09‐2 NL 11,000 NL 97,000 7 4,050 7 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Styrene 100‐42‐5 NL 820,000 300,000 260,000 2,000 300,000 2,000 667 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Tetrachloroethene 127‐18‐4 NL 550 NL 5,000 5 9,920 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Toluene 108‐88‐3 NL 720,000 200,000 91,000,000 4,000 200,000 4,000 1,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐60‐5 NL 15,000 NL 720,000 400 784 400 133 N/A 5 N/A N/A

trans‐1,3‐Dichloropropene + 10061‐02‐6 NL 1,700 NL 7,000 5 398 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Trichloroethene 79‐01‐6 NL 440 NL 20,000 7 12,400 7 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Trichlorofluoromethane 75‐69‐4 NL 79,000 NL 340,000,000 22,000 16,400 16,400 5,467 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Vinyl Chloride 75‐01‐4 NL 60 NL 2,000 5 646 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Xylenes (Total)* 1330‐20‐7 NL 63 10,000 170,000,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 3,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 24 of 43

NJDEP Non‐

Residential

Direct Contact

Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default

Impact to

Groundwater

Soil Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low Soil

MDLs QLs

1,1'‐Biphenyl 92‐52‐4 NL 5,100 NL 34,000,000 90,000 NL 90,000 30,000 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

1,2,4,5‐Tetrachlorobenzene 95‐94‐3 NL 1,800 NL NL NL 2,020 1,800 600 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,2'‐Oxybis (1‐chloropropane) 108‐60‐1 NL 4,600 NL 67,000 3,000 19,900 3,000 1,000 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,3,4,6‐Tetrachlorophenol 58‐90‐2 NL 180,000 NL 0 0 199 199 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,4,5‐Trichlorophenol 95‐95‐4 NL 610,000 9,000 68,000,000 44,000 9,000 9,000 3,000 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,4,6‐Trichlorophenol 88‐06‐2 NL 6,100 4,000 74,000 200 4,000 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,4‐Dichlorophenol 120‐83‐2 NL 18,000 NL 2,100,000 200 87,500 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,4‐Dimethylphenol 105‐67‐9 NL 120,000 NL 14,000,000 700 10 10 10 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,4‐Dinitrophenol 51‐28‐5 NL 12,000 20,000 1,400,000 300 20,000 300 300 N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

2,4‐Dinitrotoluene 121‐14‐2 NL 1,600 NL 3,000 200 1,280 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2,6‐Dinitrotoluene 606‐20‐2 NL 6,100 NL 3,000 200 33 33 33 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2‐Chloronapthalene 91‐58‐7 NL 630,000 NL NL NL 12 12 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2‐Chlorophenol 95‐57‐8 NL 39,000 NL 2,200,000 500 243 243 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2‐Methylnapthalene 91‐57‐6 NL 31,000 NL 2,400,000 5,000 3,240 3,240 1,080 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

2‐Methylphenol 95‐48‐7 NL 310,000 NL 3,400,000 NA NL 310,000 103,333 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

2‐Nitroaniline 88‐74‐4 NL 61,000 NL 23,000,000 NA 74,100 39,000 13,000 N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

2‐Nitrophenol 88‐75‐5 NL NL NL NL NL 1,600 1,600 NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

3,3'‐Dichlorobenzidine 91‐94‐1 NL 1,100 NL 4,000 200 646 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

3‐Nitroaniline 99‐09‐2 NL NL NL NL NL 3,160 3,160 NL N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

4,6‐Dinitro‐2‐methylphenol 534‐52‐1 NL 490 NL 68,000 300 144 144 144 N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

4‐Bromophenyl‐phenylether 101‐55‐3 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

4‐Chloro‐3‐methylphenol 59‐50‐7 NL 610,000 NL NL NL NL 610,000 NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

4‐Chloroaniline 106‐47‐8 NL 2,400 NL NL NL 1,100 1,100 367 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

4‐Chlorophenyl‐phenyl ether 7005‐72‐3 NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

4‐Methylphenol 106‐44‐5 NL 31,000 NL 340,000 NA 163,000 31,000 10,333 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

4‐Nitroaniline 100‐01‐6 NL 24,000 NL NL NL 21,900 21,900 7,300 N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

4‐Nitrophenol 100‐02‐7 NL NL 7,000 NL NL 7,000 7,000 2,333 N/A NL 330 N/A N/A

Acenaphthene 83‐32‐9 29,000 340,000 20,000 37,000,000 74,000 29,000 29,000 9,667 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Acenaphthylene 208‐96‐8 29,000 340,000 NL 300,000,000 NA 29,000 29,000 9,667 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Acetophenone 98‐86‐2 NL 780,000 NL 5,000 2,000 300,000 2,000 667 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Anthracene 120‐12‐7 29,000 1,700,000 NL 30,000,000 1,500,000 29,000 29,000 9,667 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Atrazine 1912‐24‐9 NL 2,100 NL 2,400,000 200 NL 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Benzaldehyde 100‐52‐7 NL 780,000 NL 68,000,000 NA NL 6,100,000 2,033,333 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Benzo (a) anthracene 56‐55‐3 1,100 150 NL 2,000 500 1,100 500 170 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Benzo (a) pyrene 50‐32‐8 1,100 15 NL 200 200 1,100 200 170 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Benzo (b) fluoroanthene 205‐99‐2 NL 150 NL 2,000 2,000 59,800 600 170 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191‐24‐2 1,100 170,000 NL 30,000,000 NA 1,100 1,100 367 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

QAPP Worksheet #15lReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil SVOCs

Semi‐Volatile Organic

Compounds

(All units: μg/kg)

CAS Number


Project Action Limit Achievable

Laboratory Limits**

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)EPA EcoSSLs (1) Soil PRGs (3)

Federal New Jersey

MDLs

Ecological

Action LimitEPA Regional

Screening

Level

(2)

Analytical Method

CRQL




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 25 of 43

NJDEP Non‐

Residential

Direct Contact

Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default

Impact to

Groundwater

Soil Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low SIM

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low Soil

MDLs QLs

QAPP Worksheet #15lReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil SVOCs

Semi‐Volatile Organic

Compounds

(All units: μg/kg)

CAS Number


Project Action Limit Achievable

Laboratory Limits**

Project

Action Limit

(PAL)EPA EcoSSLs (1) Soil PRGs (3)

Federal New Jersey

MDLs

Ecological


Screening

Level

(2)

Analytical Method

CRQL

Benzo (k) fluoroanthene 207‐08‐9 NL 1,500 NL 23,000 16,000 148,000 6,000 2,000 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Bis (2‐chloroethoxy) methane 111‐91‐1 NL 18,000 NL NL NL 302 302 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Bis (2‐ethylhexyl) phthalate 117‐81‐7 NL 35,000 NL 140,000 790,000 925 925 308 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

bis‐(2‐chloroethyl) ether 111‐44‐4 NL 210 NL 2,000 200 23,700 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Butylbenzylphthalate 85‐68‐7 NL 260,000 NL 14,000,000 150,000 239 239 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Caprolactam 105‐60‐2 NL 3,100,000 NL 340,000,000 8,000 NL 8,000 2,667 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Carbazole 86‐74‐8 NL NL NL 96,000 NA NL 24,000 8,000 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Chrysene 218‐01‐9 1,100 15,000 NL 230,000 52,000 1,100 1,100 367 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Dibenzo (a,h)‐anthracene 53‐70‐3 1,100 15 NL 200 500 1,100 200 170 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Dibenzofuran 132‐64‐9 NL 7,800 NL NL NL NL 7,800 NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Diethylphthalate 84‐66‐2 NL 4,900,000 100,000 550,000,000 57,000 100,000 57,000 19,000 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Dimethylphthalate 131‐11‐3 NL NL NL NL NL 734,000 734,000 NL N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Di‐n‐butylphthalate 84‐74‐2 NL 610,000 200,000 68,000,000 620,000 200,000 200,000 66,667 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Di‐n‐octylphthalate 117‐84‐0 NL NL NL 27,000,000 3,300,000 709,000 709,000 236,333 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Fluoranthene 206‐44‐0 1,100 230,000 NL 24,000,000 840,000 1,100 1,100 367 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Fluorene 86‐73‐7 29,000 230,000 NL 24,000,000 110,000 29,000 29,000 9,667 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Hexachlorobenzene 118‐74‐1 NL 300 NL 1,000 200 199 199 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Hexachlorobutadiene 87‐68‐3 NL 6,100 NL 25,000 600 40 40 40 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Hexachlorocyclo‐pentadiene 77‐47‐4 NL 37,000 10,000 110,000 210,000 10,000 10,000 3,333 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Hexachloroethane 67‐72‐1 NL 4,300 NL 140,000 200 596 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Indeno (1,2,3‐cd)‐pyrene 193‐39‐5 1,100 150 NL 2,000 5,000 1,100 600 200 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Isophorone 78‐59‐1 NL 510,000 NL 2,000,000 200 139,000 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Napthalene 91‐20‐3 29,000 3,600 NL 17,000 16,000 29,000 6,000 2,000 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Nitrobenzene 98‐95‐3 NL 4,800 NL 340,000 200 1,310 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

N‐Nitroso‐di‐n propylamine 621‐64‐7 NL 69 NL 300 200 NL 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

N‐Nitrosodiphenylamine 86‐30‐6 NL 99,000 NL 390,000 200 545 200 170 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Pentachlorophenol 87‐86‐5 2,100 890 3,000 10,000 300 2,100 300 300 N/A 6.7 330 N/A N/A

Phenanthrene 85‐01‐8 29,000 1,700,000 NL 300,000,000 NA 29,000 29,000 9,667 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A

Phenol 108‐95‐2 NL 1,800,000 30,000 210,000,000 5,000 30,000 5,000 1,667 N/A NL 170 N/A N/A

Pyrene 129‐00‐0 1,100 170,000 NL 18,000,000 550,000 1,100 1,100 367 N/A 3.3 170 N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 26 of 43

CRQL

NJDEP Non‐

Residential

Direct Contact

Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default

Impact to

Groundwater

Soil

Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Soil

MDLs QLs

Aroclor‐1016 12674‐11‐2 NL 390.00 n 371 e 1,000 200 371 200 67 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1221 11104‐28‐2 NL 140.00 c 371 e 1,000 200 371 200 67 N/A 33 N/A N/A








QAPP Worksheet #15mReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil Aroclors (PCBs)


Limits**New Jersey

MDLs

Aroclors

(All units: μg/kg)CAS Number

Project Action

Limit (PAL)

Project Quantitation Limit Goal (PQLG)***EPA EcoSSLs (1) Soil PRGs (3)

Federal

Analytical Method

Ecological


Screening Level

(2)





Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 27 of 43

CRQL

EPA EcoSSLs (1)

EPA Regional

Screening Level

(2)

Soil PRGs (3)

NJDEP Non‐

Residential

Direct Contact

Soil

Remediation

Standard (4)

NJDEP Default

Impact to

Groundwater

Soil

Remediation

Standard (5)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Soil

MDLs QLs

4,4'‐DDD 72‐54‐8 21 2,000 NL 13,000 3,000 21 21 7 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDE 72‐55‐9 21 1,400 NL 9,000 12,000 21 21 7 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDT 50‐29‐3 21 1,700 NL 8,000 7,000 21 21 7 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Aldrin 309‐00‐2 NL 29 NL 200 100 3 3 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

alpha‐BHC 319‐84‐6 NL 77 NL 500 2 99 2 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

alpha‐Chlordane 5103‐71‐9 NL 1,600 NL 1,000 30 224 30 10 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

beta‐BHC 319‐85‐7 NL 270 NL 2,000 2 4 2 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

delta‐BHC 319‐86‐8 NL 270 NL NL NL 9,940 270 90 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Dieldrin 60‐57‐1 5 30 NL 200 3 5 3 3 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endosulfan I 959‐98‐8 NL 37,000 NL 6,800,000 2,000 119 119 40 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Endosulfan II 33213‐65‐9 NL 37,000 NL 6,800,000 2,000 119 119 40 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endosulfan sulfate 1031‐07‐8 NL 37,000 NL 6,800,000 1,000 36 36 12 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin 72‐20‐8 NL 1,800 NL 340,000 600 10 10 5 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin aldehyde 7421‐93‐4 NL 1,800 NL NL NL 11 11 4 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin ketone 53494‐70‐5 NL 1,800 NL NL NL NL 1,800 600 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

gamma‐BHC (Lindane) 58‐89‐9 NL 520 NL 2,000 2 5 2 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

gamma‐Chlordane 5103‐74‐2 NL 1,600 NL 1,000 30 224 30 10 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Heptachlor 76‐44‐8 NL 110 NL 700 300 6 6 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Heptachlor epoxide 1024‐57‐3 NL 53 NL 300 9 152 9 3 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Methoxychlor 72‐43‐5 NL 31,000 NL 5,700,000 100,000 20 20 7 N/A 17 N/A N/A

Toxaphene 8001‐35‐2 NL 440 NL 3,000 200 119 119 40 N/A 170 N/A N/A

Project Action

Limit (PAL)


Analytical Method

Ecological

Action Limit


Federal

QAPP Worksheet #15n

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil Pesticides


Limits**New Jersey

MDLs

Pesticides

(All units: μg/kg)CAS Number




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 28 of 43

1. EPA Ecological Soil Screening Levels (EcoSSLs). http://www.epa.gov/ecotox/ecossl/

2. EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSL) for residential soil based on carcinogenic target risk of 10‐6 and noncancer hazard index of 0.1,

http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb‐concentration_table/index.htm). November 2013.

3. Efroymson, R.A., G.W. Suter II, B.E. Sample, and D.S. Jones. 1997. Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for Ecological Endpoints.

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management Contract No. DE‐AC05‐84OR21401.

4. NJDEP Non‐Residential Direct Contact Health Based Criteria and Soil Remediation Standards (Last Revised 6/2008);

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/guidance/rs/, downloaded January 31, 2014

5. NJDEP Guidance Document, Development of Site‐Specific Impact to Groundwater Soil Remediation Standards Using the Soil‐Water Partition Equation;

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/guidance/rs/igw_intro.htm, downloaded January 31, 2014



See Appendix C for DESA information regarding this worksheet.

CAS = Chemical abstract service

CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit

EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency

MDL = method detection limit

N/A = Not Applicable

NJDEP = New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

NL = Not Listed or chemical name listed but no value available

PAL= Project Action Limit

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Soil

Notes from QAPP Worksheet #15k‐n





Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 29 of 43

New Jersey CRQL

EPA

Freshwater

Sediment

Screening

Benchmark (1)

NJDEP

Guidance for

Sediment

Quality (3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low Soil

MDLs QLs

1,1,1‐Trichloroethane 71‐55‐6 30.2 640,000 ns 213 213 71 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2,2‐Tetrachloroethane 79‐34‐5 1360 560 c 850 560 187 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloro‐1,2,2‐trifluoroethane 76‐13‐1 NL 910,000 ns NL 910,000 303,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1,2‐Trichloroethane 79‐00‐5 1240 160 n 518 160 53 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1‐Dichloroethane 75‐34‐3 NL 3,300 c NL 3,300 1,100 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,1‐Dicholoroethene 75‐35‐4 31 24,000 n 19.4 19 6 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2,3‐Trichlorobenzene 87‐61‐6 858 4,900 n NL 858 286 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2,4‐Trichlorobenzene 120‐82‐1 2100 6,200 n 5062 5,062 1,687 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromo‐3‐chloropropane 96‐12‐8 NL 5 c NL 5 5 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dibromoethane 106‐93‐4 NL 34 c NL 34 11 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichlorobenzene 95‐50‐1 16.5 190,000 n 294 294 98 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloroethane 107‐06‐2 NL 430 c 260 260 87 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,2‐Dichloropropane 78‐87‐5 NL 940 c 333 333 111 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,3‐Dichlorobenzene 541‐73‐1 4430 NL o 1315 1,315 438 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,4‐Dichlorobenzene 106‐46‐7 599 2,400 c 318 318 106 N/A 5 N/A N/A

1,4‐Dioxane 123‐91‐1 NL 4,900 c NL 4,900 1,633 N/A 100 N/A N/A

2‐Butanone 78‐93‐3 NL 2,800,000 n NL 2,800,000 933,333 N/A 10 N/A N/A

2‐Hexanone 591‐78‐6 NL 21,000 n NL 21,000 7,000 N/A 10 N/A N/A

4‐Methyl‐2‐pentanone 108‐10‐1 NL 2,200,000 ns NL 2,200,000 733,333 N/A 10 N/A N/A

Acetone 67‐64‐1 NL 6,100,000 n NL 6,100,000 2,033,333 N/A 10 N/A N/A

Benzene 71‐43‐2 NL 1,100 c 340 340 113 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromochloromethane 74‐97‐5 NL 16,000 n NL 16,000 5,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromodichloromethane 75‐27‐4 NL 270 c NL 270 90 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromoform 75‐25‐2 654 62,000 c 492 492 164 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Bromomethane 74‐83‐9 NL 730 n 1.37 1.37 1.37 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Carbon Disulfide 75‐15‐0 0.851 82,000 n NL 0.85 0.85 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Carbon tetrachloride 56‐23‐5 64.2 610 c 1450 610 203 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chlorobenzene 108‐90‐7 8.42 29,000 n 291 291 97 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloroethane 75‐00‐3 NL 1,500,000 n NL 1,500,000 500,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloroform 67‐66‐3 NL 290 c 121 121 40 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Chloromethane 74‐87‐3 NL 12,000 n NL 12,000 4,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

cis‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐59‐2 NL 16,000 n NL 16,000 5,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

cis‐1,3‐Dichloropropene +

10061‐01‐5 NL 1,700 c NL 1,700 567 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Cyclohexane 110‐82‐7 NL 120,000 ns NL 120,000 40,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

QAPP Worksheet #15oReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment VOCs


(All units: μg/kg)


Project Action

Limit (PAL)


Limits**

MDLs


CAS Number EPA Regional

Screening

Level

(2)

Federal

Analytical Method




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 30 of 43

New Jersey CRQL

EPA

Freshwater

Sediment

Screening

Benchmark (1)

NJDEP

Guidance for

Sediment

Quality (3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Low Soil

MDLs QLs

QAPP Worksheet #15oReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment VOCs


(All units: μg/kg)


Project Action

Limit (PAL)


Limits**

MDLs


CAS Number EPA Regional

Screening

Level

(2)

Federal

Analytical Method

Dibromochloromethane 124‐48‐1 NL 680 c NL 680 227 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Dichlorodifluoromethane 75‐71‐8 NL 9,400 n NL 9,400 3,133 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Ethylbenzene 100‐41‐4 1100 5,400 cs 1400 1,400 467 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Isopropylbenzene 98‐82‐8 86 260,000 ns NL 86 29 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methyl acetate 79‐20‐9 NL 7,800,000 n NL 7,800,000 2,600,000 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methyl tert‐butyl ether 1634‐04‐4 NL 43,000 c NL 43,000 14,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methylcyclohexane 108‐87‐2 NL NL 0 NL NL NL N/A 5 N/A N/A

Methylene chloride 75‐09‐2 NL 11,000 c 159 159 53 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Styrene 100‐42‐5 559 820,000 ns 254 254 85 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Tetrachloroethene 127‐18‐4 468 550 c 450 450 150 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Toluene 108‐88‐3 NL 720,000 ns 2500 2,500 833 N/A 5 N/A N/A

trans‐1,2‐Dichloroethene 156‐60‐5 1050 15,000 n 654 654 218 N/A 5 N/A N/A

trans‐1,3‐Dichloropropene +

10061‐02‐6 NL 1,700 c NL 1,700 567 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Trichloroethene 79‐01‐6 96.9 440 n 1600 440 147 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Trichlorofluoromethane 75‐69‐4 NL 79,000 n NL 79,000 26,333 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Vinyl Chloride 75‐01‐4 NL 60 c 202 60 20 N/A 5 N/A N/A

Xylenes (Total)* 1330‐20‐7 NL 63 n 120 63 21 N/A 5 N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 31 of 43

New Jersey

EPA Freshwater Sediment Screening

Benchmark (1)

NJDEP Guidance for

Sediment Quality (3)

Analytical Method - SOM01.2 Low SIM

Analytical Method - SOM01.2 Low Soil

MDLs QLs

1,1'-Biphenyl 92-52-4 1220 5,100 n NL 1,220 407 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95-94-3 1090 1,800 n 1252 1,252 417 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,2'-Oxybis (1-chloropropane) 108-60-1 NL 4,600 c NL 4,600 1,533 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58-90-2 284 180,000 n NL 284 284 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 NL 610,000 n NL 610,000 203,333 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 213 6,100 n 208 208 208 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 117 18,000 n 81.7 81.7 81.7 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 29 120,000 n 304 304 304 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 NL 12,000 n 6.21 6.21 6.21 N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 41.6 1,600 c 14.4 14.4 14.4 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 NL 6,100 n NL 6,100 2,033 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2-Chloronapthalene 91-58-7 NL 630,000 n 417 417 417 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 31.2 39,000 n 31.9 31.9 31.9 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2-Methylnapthalene 91-57-6 20.2 31,000 n 70 70 23 N/A 3.3 170 SIM N/A N/A

2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 NL 310,000 n NL 310,000 103,333 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

2-Nitroaniline 88-74-4 NL 61,000 n NL 61,000 20,333 N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 127 1,100 c 127 127 127 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

3-Nitroaniline 99-09-2 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 534-52-1 NL 490 n NL 490 490 N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 101-55-3 1230 NL NL 1,230 410 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 59-50-7 NL 610,000 n NL 610,000 203,333 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

4-Chloroaniline 106-47-8 NL 2,400 c NL 2,400 800 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether 7005-72-3 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

4-Methylphenol 106-44-5 670 31,000 n NL 670 223 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

4-Nitroaniline 100-01-6 NL 24,000 c NL 24,000 8,000 N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 NL NL 13.3 13.3 13.3 N/A NL 330 Low N/A N/A

MDLs

Federal CRQL

Analytical Method

QAPP Worksheet #15pReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment SVOCs

Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds

(All units: μg/kg)

CAS Number



(PAL)

Project Action Limit Achievable Laboratory Limits**

EPA Regional Screening Level

(2)

Project- Specific Option




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 32 of 43

New Jersey


Benchmark (1)

NJDEP Guidance for




MDLs QLsMDLs

Federal CRQL

Analytical Method



(All units: μg/kg)

CAS Number



(PAL)



(2)


Acenaphthene 83-32-9 6.7 340,000 n 16 16 5 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 5.9 340,000 44 44 15 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Acetophenone 98-86-2 NL 780,000 n NL 780,000 260,000 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Anthracene 120-12-7 57.2 1,700,000 n 220 220 220 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Atrazine 1912-24-9 6.62 2,100 c NL 6.62 6.62 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 NL 780,000 n NL 780,000 260,000 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Benzo (a) anthracene 56-55-3 108 150 c 320 150 50 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Benzo (a) pyrene 50-32-8 150 15 c 370 15 5 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Benzo (b) fluoroanthene 205-99-2 NL 150 c 10400 150 50 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191-24-2 170 170,000 170 170 57 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Benzo (k) fluoroanthene 207-08-9 240 1,500 c 240 240 80 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane 111-91-1 NL 18,000 n NL 18,000 6,000 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 117-81-7 180 35,000 c 182 182 182 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

bis-(2-chloroethyl) ether 111-44-4 NL 210 c 3520 210 210 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Butylbenzylphthalate 85-68-7 10900 260,000 c 1970 1,970 657 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Caprolactam 105-60-2 NL 3,100,000 n NL 3,100,000 1,033,333 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Carbazole 86-74-8 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Chrysene 218-01-9 166 15,000 c 340 340 340 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Dibenzo (a,h)-anthracene 53-70-3 33 15 c 60 15 5 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 415 7,800 n NL 415 415 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Diethylphthalate 84-66-2 603 4,900,000 n 295 295 295 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Dimethylphthalate 131-11-3 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Di-n-butylphthalate 84-74-2 6470 610,000 n 1114 1,114 371 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Di-n-octylphthalate 117-84-0 NL NL NL NL NL N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Fluoranthene 206-44-0 423 230,000 n 750 750 250 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Fluorene 86-73-7 77.4 230,000 n 190 190 190 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 20 300 c 20 20 20 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 33 of 43

New Jersey


Benchmark (1)

NJDEP Guidance for




MDLs QLsMDLs

Federal CRQL

Analytical Method



(All units: μg/kg)

CAS Number



(PAL)



(2)


Hexachlorobutadiene 87‐68‐3 NL 6,100 n 26.5 26.5 26.5 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Hexachlorocyclo‐pentadiene 77‐47‐4 NL 37,000 n 901 901 300 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Hexachloroethane 67‐72‐1 1027 4,300 n 584 584 195 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Indeno (1,2,3‐cd)‐pyrene 193‐39‐5 17 150 c 200 150 50 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Isophorone 78‐59‐1 NL 510,000 c 432 432 144 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Napthalene 91‐20‐3 176 3,600 c 160 160 53 N/A 3.3 170 Sim N/A N/A

Nitrobenzene 98‐95‐3 NL 4,800 c 145 145 145 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

N‐Nitroso‐di‐n propylamine 621‐64‐7 NL 69 c NL 69 69 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

N‐Nitrosodiphenylamine 86‐30‐6 2680 99,000 c NL 2,680 893 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Pentachlorophenol 87‐86‐5 504 890 c 23000 890 297 N/A 6.7 330 Low N/A N/A

Phenanthrene 85‐01‐8 204 1,700,000 n(7) 560 560 187 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A

Phenol 108‐95‐2 420 1,800,000 n 49.1 49.1 49.1 N/A NL 170 Low N/A N/A

Pyrene 129‐00‐0 195 170,000 n 490 490 490 N/A 3.3 170 Low N/A N/A




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 34 of 43

New Jersey CRQL

EPA

Freshwater

Sediment

Screening

Benchmark (1)

NJDEP

Guidance for

Sediment

Quality (3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Soil

MDLs QLs

Aroclor‐1016 12674‐11‐2 59.8 390 n 7 7 7 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1221 11104‐28‐2 59.8 140 c NL 59.8 59.8 N/A 33 N/A N/A



Aroclor‐1248 12672‐29‐6 59.8 220 c 30 30 30 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1254 11097‐69‐1 59.8 110 n 60 60 60.0 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1260 11096‐82‐5 59.8 220 c 5 5 5 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1262 37324‐23‐5 59.8 110 n NL 59.8 59.8 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Aroclor‐1268 11100‐14‐4 59.8 110 n NL 59.8 59.8 N/A 33 N/A N/A

Analytical Method

CAS Number



Federal

EPA Regional

Screening

Level

(2)

QAPP Worksheet #15qReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment Aroclors (PCBs)

Aroclors

(All units:

μg/kg)

Project Action

Limit (PAL)


Limits**

MDLs




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 35 of 43

New Jersey CRQL

EPA

Freshwater

Sediment

Screening

Benchmark (1)

NJDEP

Guidance for

Sediment

Quality (3)

Analytical

Method ‐

SOM01.2

Soil

MDLs QLs

4,4'‐DDD 72‐54‐8 4.88 2,000 c 8 8 3 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDE 72‐55‐9 3.16 1,400 c 5 5 5 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

4,4'‐DDT 50‐29‐3 4.16 1,700 c 8 8 8 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Aldrin 309‐00‐2 2 29 c 2 2 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

alpha‐BHC 319‐84‐6 6 77 c 6 6 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

alpha‐Chlordane 5103‐71‐9 3.24 1,600 c(8) 7 7 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

beta‐BHC 319‐85‐7 5 270 c 5 5 5 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

delta‐BHC 319‐86‐8 6400 270 c NL 270 90 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Dieldrin 60‐57‐1 1.9 30 c 2 2 2 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endosulfan I 959‐98‐8 2.9 37,000 n NL 2.90 3 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Endosulfan II 33213‐65‐9 14 37,000 n NL 14 5 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endosulfan sulfate 1031‐07‐8 5.4 37,000 n(9) 34.6 34.60 12 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin 72‐20‐8 2.22 1,800 n 3 3 3 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin aldehyde 7421‐93‐4 NL 1,800 n 480 480 160 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

Endrin ketone 53494‐70‐5 NL 1,800 n NL 1,800 600 N/A 3.3 N/A N/A

gamma‐BHC (Lindane) 58‐89‐9 2.37 520 c 3 3 3 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

gamma‐Chlordane 5103‐74‐2 3.24 1,600 c(8) 7 7 2 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Heptachlor 76‐44‐8 68 110 c 0.6 0.60 0.60 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Heptachlor epoxide 1024‐57‐3 2.47 53 c 5 5 5 N/A 1.7 N/A N/A

Methoxychlor 72‐43‐5 18.7 31,000 n 13.6 13.6 5 N/A 17 N/A N/A

Toxaphene 8001‐35‐2 0.1 440 c 0.077 0.077 0.077 N/A 170 N/A N/A

QAPP Worksheet 15r

Reference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment Pesticides

Pesticides

(All units: μg/kg)

Project Action

Limit (PAL)


Limits**

MDLs

Analytical Method

CAS

Number



EPA Regional

Screening Level

(2)

Federal




Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 36 of 43

Source:1 EPA Freshwater Sediment Screening Benchmarks . August 2006. http://www.epa.gov/reg3hscd/risk/eco/btag/sbv/fwsed/screenbench.htm.

3 NJDEP Freshwater Sediment Screening Guidelines. (webpage http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/regs/sediment/table_01.htm). March 2009.

Site specific background levels will be developed using site data (when available) and NJ ambient background values. The background data will be compared to

the proposed screening levels to determine the final RI Screening Criteria.



Notes: FOOTNOTES FOR HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING LEVELS:

* ‐ value for total PCBs(1) OSWER screening value for residential soil

µg/kg ‐ micrograms per kilogram(2) screening value for mercuric chloride (and other mercury salts)

ca ‐ value based on cancer effects(3) screening value for nickel soluble salts

EPA ‐ Environmental Protection Agency (4) screening value for vanadium and compounds

m ‐ concentration may exceed ceiling limit (5) screening value for acenaphthene

mg/kg ‐ milligrams per kilogram(6) screening value for pyrene

n ‐ value based on noncancer effects(7) screening value for anthracene

NA ‐ not applicable(8) screening value for chlordane

NJDEP ‐ New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection(9) screening value for endosulfan

RI ‐ remedial investigation

NL ‐ not listed

s ‐ concentration may exceed saturation concentration


Notes for QAPP Worksheet #15o‐rReference Limits and Evaluation Table ‐ Sediment

2 EPA 2011. EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) for residential soil. To account for exposure to multiple chemicals, RSLs for chemicals based on noncancer effects are decreased by a

factor of 10 to account for a target hazard quotient (HQ) of 0.1. November. http://www.epa.gov/region09/superfund/prg/index.html




Page 37 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #16 Project Schedule/Timeline Table

See attached Figure 1



Page 38 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #17h Sampling Design and Rationale Revised Remedial Investigation

Describe and provide a rationale for choosing the sampling approach: Concerns regarding the reliability of select analytical results for soil, groundwater, sediment and surface water previously received in conjunction with this RI/FS, environmental samples are proposed to be re‐collected from previously sampled locations in support of the RI/FS and the associated risk assessments. Sampling locations include the Albea Americas, Inc. (Albea) property (formerly the American National Can property) and all the adjacent properties, including Warren Lumber Yard (WLY), Vikon Tile Corporation (VTC), Area of Concern 1 (AC 1) and the railroad right‐of‐way. The borings are summarized on attached Table 1, while Figure 2 shows the proposed soil boring locations. Table 2 provides the sampling rationale for each location. Sampling Design: The number and selection of locations were selected upon review of the unreliable data. All sample naming schemes are detailed in the Final QAPP (June 2011). Sample locations names will be modified starting with the 200 to identify them as being from this investigation. The revised remedial investigation events are detailed below. Shallow Soil Borings A total of 24 shallow borings will be advanced to approximately 40‐feet bgs during this event (21 plus three contingency. A 2‐inch ID macro‐core sampler will be advanced to depth. Lithologic samples will be collected continuously using a 4‐foot long macro‐core sampler with lexan liners. Upon retrieval from the sampler, each 4‐foot sample will be opened by the driller and screened for VOCs using a photo‐ionization detector (PID) by the field geologist. The lithology of each sample will be characterized and logged by the field geologist. The sampling and lithologic logging procedures are detailed in the TSOPs 1‐4 and 3‐5 (field copy will have all required TSOPs). It is assumed that up to six soil samples will be collected from each of the 40‐foot soil borings. Samples will be analyzed as described in Table 1. All borings will at least be sampled at a depth of 0 to 2 feet and 5 to 7 feet. The depth of the remaining samples will be selected in the field based on visual observations, highest PID screening results, and to provide proper vertical coverage. Perched Groundwater Sampling Following completion of the soil borings a DPT drill rig will be used to collect up to 15 groundwater screening samples from the perched groundwater zones. Samples will only be attempted in zones that show significant evidence of perched groundwater. Adjacent to the original borehole locations, the DPT rods will be advanced to the sampling depth first, and a four‐foot screen will be exposed to the formation. Prior to sampling, the screen will be briefly developed using a peristaltic pump (or a check valve if depth to groundwater is too great) to clear the screen and formation of silt and fine‐grained particles. Following a brief development of no longer than 30 minutes, a grab sample of the groundwater will be collected. If the screening samples collected contain excessive amounts of sediment, CDM will work with the laboratory and the driller to revise the approach. Contingencies could include changing the type or size of the sample bottles, additional development of the screen interval or alternative sampling methods. The CDM Smith RQAC will check that all DQOs can be met by the alternative sampling methods. Field parameters including pH, conductivity, temperature, DO, ORP, and turbidity will be measured at the time of sampling. If the perched zone does not provide sufficient water for a sample then a sample will not be collected. Samples will be analyzed for TCL Trace level VOCs.



Page 39 of 43



Deep Facility Soil Borings A total of 4 deep borings will be advanced to approximately 125‐feet bgs during this event below the facility. Sonic drilling methods were selected. Due to height constraints, exhaust and dust control issues, sonic drilling is the cleanest drilling method with the capabilities of collecting samples in the geologic materials at the site. To advance each of the deep soil borings through the facility floor an appropriate sized concrete hole will be cut through the floor using a concrete coring tool. Following concrete coring a 4‐inch diameter casing will be advanced to depth using a mini‐sonic drill rig. Lithologic samples will be collected in 10‐foot sections using the 4‐inch lead casing. Upon retrieval from the sampler, each ten‐foot sample will be screened for VOCs using a photo‐ionization detector (PID). The lithology of each sample will be characterized and logged by the field geologist. The sampling and lithologic logging procedures are detailed in TSOPs 1‐4 and 3‐5. At each interior deep soil boring, subsurface soil samples will be collected at 0 to 2 feet, 5 to 7 feet, and every 10 feet from 10 feet bgs to a total depth of approximately 125 feet bgs. The goal of the sampling being to collect a soil sample from each ten‐foot depth interval. Exact sample depths will be selected in the field based on results of the field screening with the PID. Each boring will be advanced to the top of bedrock or into the regional groundwater table (water levels in nearby wells will be reviewed by the field crew to gain an understanding of the depth of the regional water table), whichever is encountered first. It is assumed that up to 14 soil samples will be collected from each of the deep soil borings as described above. Each soil sample will be analyzed for TCL VOCs and moisture content. In addition, at up to five of the sampling intervals additional soil volume will be analyzed for TOC, grain size, TCL SVOCs, PCBs and pesticides. The additional parameters will be collected at the 0 to 2 feet (surface soil) and 5 to 7 feet soil samples and 30 percent of the subsurface soil samples (assumed to be the 30, 60 and 90‐foot samples). The depth of the samples will be selected in the field based on visual observations and PID screening results. A summary of the analyses proposed for each boring type is presented on Table 1. If contamination is observed in deep soils (via PID) a groundwater grab sample will be collected at the base of each boring within the regional groundwater table. If bedrock is encountered before the regional groundwater table then a sample will not be collected at that location. Groundwater screening samples will be collected by advancing the 4‐inch casing to depth. Once at depth, a stainless steel bailer will be lowered to the bottom of the casing to grab a sample for trace TCL VOCs. Deep Exterior Soil Borings A total of 17 deep borings (14 plus 3 contingency) will be advanced to approximately 100 to 125‐feet bgs during this event. Sonic drilling methods were selected in order to reach the proposed depths in this area as the glacial geology has proven to be difficult to penetrate during previous investigations. Lithologic samples will be collected in 10‐foot sections using the 4‐inch lead casing. Upon retrieval from the sampler, each ten‐foot sample will be screened for VOCs using a photo‐ionization detector (PID). The lithology of each sample will be characterized and logged by the field geologist. The sampling and lithologic logging procedures are detailed in TSOPs 1‐4 and 3‐5. At each deep exterior soil boring, subsurface soil samples will be collected at 0 to 2 feet, 5 to 7 feet, and every 10 feet from 10 feet bgs to a total depth of approximately 125 feet bgs. The goal of the sampling being to collect a soil sample from each ten‐foot depth interval. Exact sample depths will be selected in the field based on results of the field screening with the PID. Each boring will be advanced to the top of bedrock or into the regional groundwater table (water levels in nearby wells will be reviewed by the field crew to gain an understanding of the depth of the regional water table), whichever is encountered first. It is assumed that up to 14 soil samples will be collected from each of the deep soil borings as described above. Each soil sample will be analyzed for TCL VOCs and moisture content. In addition, at up to five of the sampling intervals additional soil volume will be analyzed for TOC, grain size, TCL SVOCs, PCBs and pesticides. The additional parameters will be collected at the 0 to 2 feet



Page 40 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #17h

Sampling Design and Rationale Revised Remedial Investigation

(surface soil) and 5 to 7 feet soil samples and 30 percent of the subsurface soil samples (assumed to be the 30, 60 and 90‐foot samples). The depth of the samples will be selected in the field based on visual observations and PID screening results. A summary of the analyses proposed for each boring type is presented on Table 1. If contamination is observed in deep soils (via PID) a groundwater grab sample will be collected at the base of each boring within the regional groundwater table. If bedrock is encountered before the regional groundwater table then a sample will not be collected at that location. Groundwater screening samples will be collected by advancing the 4‐inch casing to depth. Once at depth, a stainless steel bailer will be lowered to the bottom of the casing to grab a sample for trace TCL VOCs. Bore Hole Abandonment After sampling, the boreholes will be backfilled with a cement‐bentonite grout. Borings completed using HSA or sonic drilling methods will be grouted using tremie pipe to grout from the base of the borehole as the drilling tools are retracted. Borings completed using DPT methods will be abandoned by filling the borehole with grout upon completion. Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Following the site reconnaissance, locations will be selected for surface water and sediment sampling. The locations will focus on drainage ditches, outfalls, seeps, drainage pipes and areas of ponded water. Up to 14 surface water and sediment samples will be collected as part of this RI. Surface water samples will be collected following EPA‐approved methodologies which will be fully detailed in the QAPP. All surface water samples will be analyzed for TCL VOC and TCL pesticides/PCBs through the EPA CLP. All samples will be analyzed using the most current EPA‐approved methods, which will be detailed in the QAPP. Table 1 summarizes the number and type of analyses for the surface water samples. Sediment samples will be collected following EPA‐approved methodologies. All sediment samples will be analyzed for TCL parameters through the EPA CLP. Table 1 summarizes the number and type of analyses for the sediment sampling.



Page 41 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #17h

Sampling Design and Rationale Revised Remedial Investigation

Field procedures for this activity are detailed in the following TSOPs (previously provided):

TSOP 1‐1 Surface Water Sampling

TSOP 1‐2 Sample Custody

TSOP 1‐3 Surface Soil Sampling

TSOP 1‐4 Subsurface Soil Sampling, Section 5.2. Direct Push Rig, Section 5.2.3 Split‐Barrel (or Split‐Spoon) Sampling

TSOP 1‐10 Field Measurement of Organic Vapors, Section 5.1 Direct Reading Measurement

TSOP 1‐11 Sediment or Sludge Sampling

TSOP 1‐14 Lagoon Sampling

TSOP 2‐1 Packing and Shipping of Environmental Samples

TSOP 2‐2 Guide to Handling Investigation Derived Waste

TSOP 3‐1 Geoprobe Sampling

TSOP 3‐5 Lithologic Logging

TSOP 4‐1 Field Logbook Content and Control

TSOP 4‐2 Photographic Documentation of Field Activities, Sections 5.2.2 General Guidelines for Still Photography and 5.2.4 Photographic Documentation

TSOP 4‐10 Borehole and Well Decommissioning, except Sections 5.3 (Well Overdrilling) and 5.4 (Borehole or Well Purging)

Worksheet 17c Decontamination Procedures (Final QAPP [CDM Smith 2011])

Table 1 Analytical groups/concentrations Low and Trace level VOCs, SVOCs, Pesticides and PCBs Sampling locations Figure 2 shows the locations of the soil borings. Number of samples/frequency See Worksheet 20 and Table 1.



Page 42 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #18 Sampling Locations and Methods/SOP Requirements Table

Please see Table 1 for sample types and analytical methods; Table 2 shows the sampling locations and rationale. TSOPs 1‐3, 1.4, and 3.1 all apply to sampling activities. The depth of all soil samples are shown on Table 1 and described on Worksheet 17h.



Revision Number: 0

November 12, 2014

Page 43 of 43

Sample Type Matrix Analytical ParameterConcentration

Level

Analytical and

Preparation SOP

Reference

Environmental

SamplesDuplicates

MS/MSD (Additional

Volume)Equipment Blanks Trip Blanks

Total No. of

Samples

Acronyms:PCBs Temp TemperatureSVOC Semi‐Volatile Organic Compound TOC Total Organic CarbonTAT Turn Around Time TSS Total Suspended SolidsTCL Target Compound List Turb TurbidityTDS Total Dissolved Solids VOC Volatile Organic Compound

8 NA 8

NA

160

4 4 (PCBs and Pest only) 4 80

3 62

1 22

12 NA 12

Deep Facility Soil Borings: 4 deep

soil borings to 125‐ft bgs

TCL VOCs, moisture content (48‐hr TAT) 56 3 NA

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides 20 1 1 (PCBs and Pest only)

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides 72

Shallow Soil Borings: 24 shallow

soil borings to 40‐ft bgs (21 onsite

and 3 contingency).

Soil

TCL VOCs, moisture content (7‐Day TAT)

Low

Deep Exterior Soil Borings: 17

deep soil borings to 100‐125 ft

bgs (13 onsite, 1 background and

3 contingency).

TCL VOCs, moisture content 238

SOM01.2

144

Shallow Soil Borings ‐

Approximately 15 groundwater

screening samples

Groundwater

TCL VOCs

Trace

15

262

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides 85 5 5 (PCBs and Pest only) 5 95

17

7

1 16

1

Surface Water TCL VOCs, PCBs and Pesticides 14 1

1 per cooler

Poly‐Chlorinated Biphenyls

1Sediment Sediment TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides Low 14

QAPP Worksheet #20

Field Quality Control Sample Summary Table

1 (PCBs and Pest only) 1 NA 16

1 NA 1

1 (PCBs and Pest only)

Deep Facility and Exterior Soil

Borings ‐ Approximately 5 grab

samples from regional water

table

TCL VOCs 5 1 NA

Surface Water


Tables

Table 1

Summary of Sampling and Analysis Program

Pohatcong Valley OU3 Site


Sample Type Matrix Analytical ParameterConcentration

LevelField Parameters Sampling Frequency/Intervals

Total

Environmental

Samples

Note: All samples will be submitted for standard TAT analysis unless otherwise noted.

Acronyms:

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls

SVOC Semi‐Volatile Organic Compound

TAT Turn Around Time

TCL Target Compound List

TDS Total Dissolved Solids

Temp Temperature

TOC Total Organic Carbon

TSS Total Suspended Solids

Turb Turbidity

VOC Volatile Organic Compound

20

5614 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 10ft, 20ft, 30ft, 40ft,

50ft, 60ft, 70ft, 80ft, 90ft, 100ft, 100 ft and 120 ft) NoneTCL VOCs, moisture content (48‐hr TAT)

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides

Low

238

85

72

144TCL VOCs, moisture content (7‐Day TAT)

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides

Soil

Deep Exterior Soil Borings: 17

deep soil borings to 100‐125 ft

bgs (13 onsite, 1 background and

3 contingency).

None14 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 10ft, 20ft, 30ft, 40ft,

50ft, 60ft, 70ft, 80ft, 90ft, 100ft, 100 ft and 120 ft)

Deep Facility Soil Borings: 4 deep

soil borings to 125‐ft bgs

None 5 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 30ft, 60ft, 90ft)

TCL VOCs, moisture content

TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides None 5 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 30ft, 60ft, 90ft)

3 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 30ft)

Shallow Soil Borings: 24 shallow

soil borings to 40‐ft bgs (21

onsite and 3 contingency).

None 6 samples per boring. (0‐2ft, 5‐7ft, 10ft, 20ft, 30ft and 40ft)

None

Sediment Sediment None 14 samples collected at Surface Water locations. 14TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides Low

14 samples 14Trace TCL VOCs, PCBs and Pesticides

Trace

Groundwater

None

1 grab sample per boring if indicated by results of PID soil

screening. Collected from the bottom of boring within the

regional GW Table.

5

pH, Temp, Cond,

DO, ORP and Turb

1 sample per boring collected from perched groundwater

when encountered.15TCL VOCs

TCL VOCs

Surface Water Surface WaterpH, Temp, Cond,

DO, ORP and Turb

Shallow Soil Borings ‐

Approximately 15 groundwater

screening samples

Deep Facility and Exterior Soil

Borings ‐ Approximately 5 grab

samples from regional water

table

1 of 1

Table 2

Soil Boring Summary



Area of Concern Proposed Resampling ID Historic Detections Rationale Proposed Resampling Scope

SBI‐209Deep Facility Boring Location. Locations to be

relocated slightly.

SBI‐210

Deep Facility Boring Location. This location will

be moved to the center of the known source

area.


relocated slightly.


relocated slightly.

SBD‐201

No soil exceedances detected,

however only one soil sample was

collected.

Soil samples were not collected in this area, SBD‐201 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination along the drainage pathway adjacent to the former ANC building and outside the previous excavated

area of the former dry well and leach field (AOC 5). MW6, adjacent to SBD‐201, detected TCE at 100 ppb.

Deep Boring Location

SBS‐203Adjacent to area of TCE

contamination under PPPI facility.

SBS‐203 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil contamination in the area adjacent to the

former ANC building in the previous excavated area (AOC 7)

This will be completed as a Shallow Boring

Location as the contamination found here was

shallow. ID changed to SBS‐203

SBD‐204 Soil samples were not collected.Soil samples were not collected in this area. SBD‐204 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination adjacent to the former ANC building in the area directly downslope of the former Blak‐Sol tank.Deep Boring Location

SBD‐205 Deep Boring Location

SBS‐206


Location as no historic contamination has been

found in the area. ID changed to SBS‐206

SBD‐207

Maximum TCE detections in this

area (1.1 ppm at 0.5 feet bgs, 13

ppm at 3 feet bgs and 9.8 ppm at

15 feet bgs).

Soil samples were not collected between 16 and 81 feet bgs, SBD‐207 will assist in the delineating the vertical extent of

soil contamination in the area of historic soil and groundwater exceedances at PVANC32 and PVANC39. SBD‐207 is also

located downslope of the railroad underdrain.

Deep Boring Location



PPP (Exterior)

Soil samples were not collected.

Soil samples were not collected. SBD‐205 and SBS‐206 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination adjacent to the former ANC building in the area downgradient of the former Blak‐Sol tank near MW13

where the highest TCE concentration (4000 ppb) was detected in groundwater.

Not ApplicableThese contingency borings were added during the RI to investigate potential release areas as were determined by

reviewing documents provided by USEPA (DOJ)

PPP (Facility)


area (100 ppm at 1.3‐1.8 feet bgs

and 9500 ppm at 76‐76.5 feet

bgs). PID readings of 96.3ppm at

17 feet bgs.

Samples collected in this area were only from 0 to 15 feet bgs except DL913 (total depth 100 feet). Sampling did not

extend beyond drain line 9, SBI‐209 and SBI‐210 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination under the former ANC building.

Samples were not collected between 27 and 64 feet bgs except BS13, BS15‐BS17, and MW12. Sampling did not extend

beyond drainage lines and the former Blak‐Sol tank. SBI‐211 and SBI‐212 will assist in delineating the soil contamination

under the former ANC building.

1 of 4

Table 2

Soil Boring Summary




SBS‐208



collected.

One soil sample was collected from 0 to 6 inches bgs in this area, SBS‐208 will assist in delineating the horizontal and

vertical extent of soil contamination along the drainage pathway adjacent to the former ANC building and outside the

previous excavated area of the former seepage pit (AOC8) and outfall (AOC18).

Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐209 Shallow Boring Location


SBS‐211

No TCE detections in the soil

samples collected. Perched water

in this area contained 1 ppb TCE.

Soil samples were not collected past 8 feet. SBS‐211 will assist in characterizing contamination related to roof drains

discharging into this drainage area.Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐212 Soil samples were not collected.

No soil samples were collected in this area. SBS‐212 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination adjacent to the former ANC building in the area downgradient of the former Blak‐Sol tank and in an area

that may possibly have been a drum storage area.



SBD‐239

Original location SBS‐19 was sampled deeper

using a contingency deep boring. This will be

resampled as a Deep Boring Location.



SBS‐217

Sampling locations on the WLY property were concentrated in the northeastern portion of the property and did not

extend below 15 feet bgs. SBS‐217 and SBS‐241 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination on the WLY property and further delineate the extent of soil contamination near the former railway.


SBS‐241 Aerial photo report suggested potential dumping in this area. Shallow Boring Location

SBD‐220Maximum TCE detection was 7

ppm at 2 feet bgs.

Soil samples were not collected below 15 feet bgs. SBD‐20 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of

soil contamination on the VTC property downgradient of the former Morris Canal drainage pathway.Deep Boring Location

SBS‐221Maximum TCE detection was 2.28

ppm at 2 feet bgs.

One soil sample was collected at 2 feet bgs. SBS‐221 will assist in delineating the extent of soil contamination within the

former Morris Canal on the VTC property adjacent to the county sampling location SB‐L4 which detected TCE at 2.28

ppm.




SBS‐224 No TCE detections over standards.Soil samples were not collected below 15 feet bgs. SBS‐224 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of

soil contamination on the VTC property within the former Morris Canal Shallow Boring Location

Soil samples were not collected below 10 feet bgs. SBS‐222 and SBS‐223 will assist in delineating the horizontal and

vertical extent of soil contamination on the VTC property along the drainage area.

PPP (Exterior)

Maximum TCE detection of 64 ppbSoil samples were not collected deeper than 2 feet bgs. SBS‐209 and SBS‐210 will assist in characterizing contamination

related to a runoff channel and storm sewer outfall discharging into this drainage area.

WLY

Soil samples were not collected.

Sampling locations on the WLY property were concentrated in the northeastern portion of the property and did not

extend below 15 feet bgs. SBD‐215 and SBD‐239 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of soil

contamination on the WLY property.

Only one soil sample was collected to a depth of 2 feet bgs in this area. SBS‐213 and SBS‐214 will assist in delineating the

horizontal and vertical extent of soil contamination in the drainage pathway downgradient of the former ANC building

and effluent pipe (DL9) noted in RI.

Maximum TCE detection in this

area is 3 ppm just northeast of

WLY.

VTC No soil exceedances detected,

however soil sampling did not

extend beyond 10 feet bgs.

Maximum TCE detected was 270

ppb (one soil sample to 2 feet was

collected).

2 of 4

Table 2

Soil Boring Summary




SBS‐225

Soil samples were not collected in

the northern portion of the

property

Soil samples were not collected in the northern portion of the AC1 property. SBS‐225 will assist in delineating the

horizontal and vertical extent of soil contamination on the AC1 property on the edge of the drainage area.


Location. Additional deep boring SBD‐38 was

added in AC1 as a contingency boring. ID

changed to SBS‐225

SBD‐226


area (3.1 ppm at 0.5 feet bgs, 52

ppm at 8 feet bgs, and 9.8 ppm at

15 feet bgs).


soil contamination within the drainage pathway of the railroad underdrain.Deep Boring Location

SBD‐227Soil samples not collected in this

area.

Soil samples were not collected directly downgradient of maximum TCE detection at PVAC106. SBD‐227 will assist in

delineating the extent of soil contamination adjacent to PVAC106 within the drainage pathway.Deep Boring Location

SBD‐228Maximum TCE detection was 6

ppb at 15 feet bgs.


soil contamination in the ponded area of AC1.Deep Boring Location

SBD‐238 Contingency boring added during the initial RI to investigate high historic detections. Deep Boring Location

SBS‐229Maximum TCE concentration of 52

ppm at 8 ft bgs.

Soil samples were not collected directly downgradient of the railroad underdrain. SBS‐229 will assist in delineating the

extent of soil contamination downgradient of the railroad underdrain within the drainage pathway.Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐230Soil samples were not collected directly downgradient of maximum TCE detection at PVAC106. SBS‐230 will assist in

delineating the extent of soil contamination adjacent to PVAC106 within the drainage pathway.Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐231Maximum detection of 6 ppb at

0.5 foot bgs.

Soil samples were not collected below 2 feet bgs. SBS‐231 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent of

soil contamination on the AC1 property in the area leading to the basin area.Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐232 Soil samples were not collected.Soil samples were not collected outside the basin area on the AC1 property. SBS‐232 will assist in delineating the extent

of soil contamination outside the basin area.Shallow Boring Location

SBS‐233



collected.

One soil sample was collected from 0 to 6 inches bgs. SBS‐233 will assist in delineating the horizontal and vertical extent

of soil contamination within the downgradient basin area.Shallow Boring Location

AC1

3 of 4

Table 2

Soil Boring Summary




OFF SBD‐235 Background DataIf analytical resultsfrom SBD‐35 are representative of background concentrations, the data will be used to establish

background concentrations for soil and perched groundwater.Background Deep Boring Location

TBD SBS‐242 through 244 NA Three shallow contingency borings to be used as results dictate. Contingency Shallow Boring Locations

TBD SBD‐245 through 247 NA Three deep contingency borings to be used as results dictate. Contingency Deep Boring Locations

Notes:

Acronyms:

AC1 ‐ Area of Concern 1 ppm ‐ parts per million

ANC ‐ American National Can PPP ‐ Pechiney Plastics Packaging, Inc.

AOC ‐ area of concern TBD ‐ to be determined

bgs ‐ below ground surface TCE ‐ trichloroethene

OFF ‐ offsite VTC ‐ Vikon Tile Corp.

PID ‐ photoionization detector WLY ‐ Warren Lumber Yard

1. Deep borings ‐ soil samples will be collected from 0‐2, 5‐7, 10‐12, and every ten foot interval to the water table or top of bedrock (approximately 125 feet bgs).

2. Shallow borings ‐ soil samples will be collected from 0‐2, 5‐7, 10‐12, and every ten foot interval to a maximum depth of 40 feet bgs.

4 of 4

Figures

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors

1 TASK 1 Project Planning & Support 336 days Mon 9/1/14 Wed 12/23/15

2 1.1 Project Administation 336 days Mon 9/1/14 Wed 12/23/15

3 1.2 Attend Scoping Meeting 1 day Wed 9/17/14 Wed 9/17/14

4 1.4 Develop Work Plan and Associated Cost Estimate 16 days Thu 9/18/14 Thu 10/9/14 3

5 EPA Review of Draft Work Plan 5 days Fri 10/10/14 Thu 10/16/14 4

6 Approval Final Work Plan 3 days Fri 10/17/14 Tue 10/21/14 5

7 1.7 Quality Assurance Project Plan 15 days Wed 10/22/14 Tue 11/11/14

8 Prepare/Submit Draft QAPP 5 days Wed 10/22/14 Tue 10/28/14 6

9 EPA Review 5 days Wed 10/29/14 Tue 11/4/14 8

10 Prepare/Submit Final QAPP 5 days Wed 11/5/14 Tue 11/11/14 9

11 1.10 Meetings 6 days Mon 5/18/15 Mon 5/25/15

12 Present and Review the Resampling Results and Approach

1 day Mon 5/18/15 Mon 5/18/15 33FS+1 wk

13 Approach to the FS 1 day Mon 5/25/15 Mon 5/25/15 33FS+2 wks

14 1.11 Subcontract Procurement 30 days Wed 10/22/14 Tue 12/2/14

15 Drilling Services 6 wks Wed 10/22/14 Tue 12/2/14 6

16 Waste Hauling and Disposal 6 wks Wed 10/22/14 Tue 12/2/14 6

17 1.12 Perform Subcontract Management 102 days Wed 11/26/14 Mon 4/27/15 19SS

18 TASK 3 Field Investigation 127 days Wed 10/22/14 Mon 4/27/15

19 Mobilization 10 days Wed 11/26/14 Tue 12/9/14 15FS-5 days

20 Site Access Support 101 days Wed 10/22/14 Fri 3/20/15 6

21 Exterior Soil Borings (Shallow) 15 days Wed 12/10/14 Thu 1/8/15 19

22 Interior Soil Boring 12 days Fri 1/9/15 Mon 1/26/15 21

23 Exterior Soil Borings (Deep) 34 days Tue 1/27/15 Fri 3/13/15 22

24 Surface Water/Sediment Sampling 2 days Wed 12/17/14 Thu 12/18/14 21SS+5 days

25 Demobilization 5 days Mon 3/16/15 Fri 3/20/15 23

26 Disposal of Field Generated Waste 1 day Mon 4/27/15 Mon 4/27/15 23FS+6 wks

27 TASK 4 Sample Analysis 66 days Wed 12/10/14 Fri 3/20/15

28 4.2 Analytical Services Provided Via CLP, DESA or ERTC

66 days Wed 12/10/14 Fri 3/20/15 21SS

29 TASK 5 Analytical Support & Data Validation 86 days Wed 11/12/14 Fri 3/20/15

30 5.2 Sample Management 86 days Wed 11/12/14 Fri 3/20/15 10

31 TASK 6 Data Evaluation 136 days Mon 4/13/15 Mon 10/19/15

32 6.1 Data Usability Evaluation 10 days Mon 4/13/15 Fri 4/24/15 23FS+4 wks

33 6.2 Data Reduction, Tabulation, and Evaluation 20 days Mon 4/13/15 Fri 5/8/15 23FS+4 wks

34 Submittal of Electronic Data Deliverable to EPA 1 day Mon 10/19/15 Mon 10/19/15 61FS+30 days

35 TASK 7 Assessment of Risk 37 days Mon 5/11/15 Tue 6/30/15

36 7.1 Baseline Human Health (HH) Risk Assessment 37 days Mon 5/11/15 Tue 6/30/15

37 Prepare & Submit Revised HHRA Report 4 wks Mon 5/11/15 Fri 6/5/15 33

38 EPA Review of Revised HHRA Report 1 wk Mon 6/8/15 Fri 6/12/15 37

39 Conference Call to Resolve EPA Comments 1 day Thu 6/18/15 Thu 6/18/15 38FS+3 days

40 Prepare Final HH Risk Assessment 8 days Fri 6/19/15 Tue 6/30/15 39

41 7.2 Ecological Risk Assessment (Screening Level) 29 days Mon 5/11/15 Thu 6/18/15

42 Prepare & Submit Revised Ecological Risk Assessment Report

3 wks Mon 5/11/15 Fri 5/29/15 33

43 EPA Review of Revised Ecological Risk Assessment Report

1 wk Mon 6/1/15 Fri 6/5/15 42

44 Conference Call to Resolve EPA Comments 1 day Thu 6/11/15 Thu 6/11/15 43FS+3 days

45 Prepare Final Ecological Risk Assessment 1 wk Fri 6/12/15 Thu 6/18/15 44

46 TASK 9 Remedial Investigation Report 44 days Tue 5/19/15 Fri 7/17/15

A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F2015

Task

Task Summary

Inactive Task

Inactive Milestone

Inactive Summary

Manual Task

Duration-only

Manual Summary Rollup

Manual Summary

Start-only

Finish-only


Page 1 Figure 1Project Schedule - Pohatcong Valley OU3 Site

Washington Borough, New Jersey

Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Site - OU3Date: Wed 10/15/14

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors

47 Prepare Draft RI Report 4 wks Tue 5/19/15 Mon 6/15/15 12

48 EPA Review of Revised RI Report 2 wks Tue 6/16/15 Mon 6/29/15 47

49 Conference Call to Resolve EPA Comments 1 day Fri 7/3/15 Fri 7/3/15 48FS+3 days

50 Prepare Final RI Report 2 wks Mon 7/6/15 Fri 7/17/15 49

51 TASK 10 Remedial Alternative Screening (Combine with Task 11)

20 days Mon 5/11/15 Fri 6/5/15

52 Remedial Alternative Screening (as a presentation) 4 wks Mon 5/11/15 Fri 6/5/15 33

53 TASK 11 Remedial Alternative Evaluation (Combine with Task 10)

26 days Mon 5/25/15 Mon 6/29/15

54 Remedial Alternative Evaluation (as a presentation) 4 wks Mon 5/25/15 Fri 6/19/15 52SS+2 wks

55 Working Meeting 1 day Mon 6/22/15 Mon 6/22/15 54

56 Submit Meeting Minutes 5 days Tue 6/23/15 Mon 6/29/15 55

57 TASK 12 Feasibility Study Report 1881 days? Mon 9/29/08 Wed 12/23/15

58 Prepare Draft FS Report 5 wks Tue 6/23/15 Mon 7/27/15 55

59 EPA Review of FS Report 2 wks Tue 7/28/15 Mon 8/10/15 58

60 Conference Call to Resolve EPA Comments 1 day Fri 8/14/15 Fri 8/14/15 59FS+3 days

61 Prepare Final FS Report 3 wks Mon 8/17/15 Fri 9/4/15 60

62 Proposed Plan 25 days Tue 8/11/15 Mon 9/14/15

63 EPA prepares Draft Proposed Plan and provides to ERRD, ORC, EQB

4 wks Tue 8/11/15 Mon 9/7/15 59

64 Final Proposed Plan to Public 1 wk Tue 9/8/15 Mon 9/14/15 63

65 Public Comment Period 22 days Mon 9/14/15 Wed 10/14/15

66 Presentation of the Proposed Plan (Public Meeting) 1 day Tue 9/15/15 Tue 9/15/15 64

67 Public Comment Period 30 edays Mon 9/14/15 Wed 10/14/15 64

68 Record of Decision 30 days Thu 10/15/15 Wed 11/25/15

69 Draft ROD to ERRD, ORC, EQB 5 wks Thu 10/15/15 Wed 11/18/15 67

70 Responsiveness Summary 5 days Thu 10/15/15 Wed 10/21/15 67

71 Final ROD for Signature 5 days Thu 11/19/15 Wed 11/25/15 69

72 TASK 16 Work Assignment Closeout 1881 days? Mon 9/29/08 Wed 12/23/15

73 Closeout 4 wks Thu 11/26/15 Wed 12/23/15 71

74

75 Assumptions 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

76 1 - Field 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

77 + No overlap of drilling activities 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

78 + All contingency borings to be installed 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

79 + Access to all properties 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

80 2 - Risk Assessment and RI reports prepared in parallel

1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

81 3 - Prposed plan started after Draft FS comments completed

1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

82 4 - Public comment period 30 days 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

83 1 day? Mon 9/29/08 Mon 9/29/08

8/11

A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F2015

Task

Task Summary

Inactive Task

Inactive Milestone

Inactive Summary

Manual Task

Duration-only

Manual Summary Rollup

Manual Summary

Start-only

Finish-only


Page 2 FigureProject Schedule - Pohatcong Valley OU3 Site

Washington Borough, New Jersey

Pohatcong Valley Groundwater Contamination Site - OU3Date: Wed 10/15/14

PPP-SBI-250

PPP-SBI-251PPP-SBI-252

PPP-SBI-253

WLY-SBS-241

WLY-SBS-217

WLY-SBD-239

WLY-SBD-215

VTC-SBS-24

VTC-SBS-223

VTC-SBS-222

VTC-SBS-221

VTC-SBD-220

WLY-SBS-214

PPP-SBS-212

PPP-SBS-211

PPP-SBS-210

PPP-SBS-209

PPP-SBS-208

PPP-SBD-237

PPP-SBD-236

PPP-SBD-207

PPP-SBS-206

PPP-SBD-05PPP-SBD-204

PPP-SBS-203PPP-SBD-201

OFF-SBD-235

AC1-SBS-233

AC1-SBS-231

AC1-SBS-230

AC1-SBS-229

AC1-SBD-238

AC1-SBD-228

AC1-SBD-227

AC1-SBD-226

AC1-SBS-225

WLY-SBS-213

AC1-SBS-232

ButtonJS C:\IMS\GIS\Pohatcong\MXD\2014\QAPP\Figure_2_Soil_Boring_Locations.mxd 11/6/2014

Figure 2Proposed Soil Boring Locations

Pohatcong Valley OU3 Study AreaWashington, NJ

Warren LumberYard (WLY)

Area of Concern 1(AC1)

Vikon TileCorp (VTC)

AmericanNational Can

(ANC)

Deep Soil Boring

Facility Soil BoringShallow Soil Boring

Railroad TracksMorris Canal Centerline, Abandoned (est.)

Drainage BasinIntermittent Stream

DL-9

DL-10

OU1 PSA Boundaries

0 150 300Feet

N

1 in = 150 feet

Facility Drain LinesFloor DrainRoof DrainSanitary SewerStorm Sewer DrainDrainage Pipes



Page 9 of 43


QAPP Worksheet #11 Project Quality Objectives/Systematic Planning Process Statements

Overall Project Objectives The revised RI will include soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment sampling below, adjacent to and in the drainage areas surrounding the Albea facility for the analyses presented below to replace unreliable data provided in the previous remedial investigation.

Who will use the data? EPA and CDM Smith will use the data.

What type of data are needed? The sampling program will include the following:

Soilo Shallow Soil Samples: Trace level TCL VOCs by SOM01.2 (with a 7‐day turnaround time [TAT] for the onsite samples).

TLC SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Facility Soil Samples: TCL VOCs by SOM01.2 (with 48‐hour TAT)TCL SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Exterior Soil Borings: TCL VOCs SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Groundwatero Shallow Soil Borings: Trace level TCL VOCs SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

o Deep Facility Soil Borings: Trace level TCL VOCs SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Surface Water: TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

Sediment: TCL VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs and Pesticides by SOM01.2 (42‐day TAT)

What will the data be used for? Data will be used to replace unreliable data reported in previous remedial investigation.

How “good” do the data need to be in order to support the environmental decision? Definitive level data required to support project decisions and risk assessments. The project action limits and quantitation limits for soil VOCs are specified on Worksheet #15. All laboratory analyses will be performed in compliance with EPA’s Field and Analytical Services Teaming Advisory Committee policy. Preference will be given in the



Page 40 of 43



(surface soil) and 5 to 7 feet soil samples and 30 percent of the subsurface soil samples (assumed to be the 30, 60 and 90‐foot samples). The depth of the samples will be selected in the field based on visual observations and PID screening results. A summary of the analyses proposed for each boring type is presented on Table 1.

If contamination is observed in deep soils (via PID) a groundwater grab sample will be collected at the base of each boring within the regional groundwater table. If bedrock is encountered before the regional groundwater table then a sample will not be collected at that location. Groundwater screening samples will be collected by advancing the 4‐inch casing to depth. Once at depth, a stainless steel bailer will be lowered to the bottom of the casing to grab a sample for trace TCL VOCs.

Bore Hole Abandonment After sampling, the boreholes will be backfilled with a cement‐bentonite grout. Borings completed using HSA or sonic drilling methods will be grouted using tremie pipe to grout from the base of the borehole as the drilling tools are retracted. Borings completed using DPT methods will be abandoned by filling the borehole with grout upon completion.

Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Following the site reconnaissance, locations will be selected for surface water and sediment sampling. The locations will focus on drainage ditches, outfalls, seeps, drainage pipes and areas of ponded water. Up to 14 surface water and sediment samples will be collected as part of this RI.

Surface water samples will be collected following EPA‐approved methodologies as described in TSOP 1-1. All surface water samples will be analyzed for TCL VOC and TCL pesticides/PCBs through the EPA CLP. All samples will be analyzed using the most current EPA‐approved methods, as shown on Worksheet 18. Table 1 summarizes the number and type of analyses for the surface water samples.

Sediment samples will be collected following EPA‐approved methodologies as described in TSOP 1-11. All sediment samples will be analyzed for TCL parameters through the EPA CLP as summarized on Table 1.

Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract · 2020-06-18 · Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract...

Documents

Transcript of Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract · 2020-06-18 · Region 2 RAC2 Remedial Action Contract...