REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL

David BanisterThe Bartlett School of Planning

University College London

Mobile Network Seminar – 16th May 2003

The New Realism

Stage 1 - Consensus that projected traffic growth is not sustainable

Stage 2 - Proposed road schemes will not solve the problem

Stage 3 - Limitations on the use of the car and substantially raising the costs of travel

Stage 4 - Awareness of the environmental and social costs of unlimited mobility

Stage 5 - Reduce the need to travel - the only means to improve the environment and congestion

The Universal Problem

Internalising the social costs of transport through the pricing mechanism

• Fuel duty increases - but this will not stabilise CO2 emissions until 2010 – abandoned in 1999

• Transport in EU15 has increased its carbon emissions by 160 m tonnes from 1990 - 2000

• A real doubling of petrol prices will reduce growth in traffic (1992-2006) from 65% to 30% - only a tripling of petrol prices will maintain traffic at current levels.

Economic Solutions

Technological Solutions

Technology has always solved the problems in the past and will solve them now

• Catalytic converters• Cash for clunkers• Electric, hybrid and hydrogen vehicles• Regional clean air incentives market

(RECLAIM)• Alternative fuels

Electric vehicles in Lillehammer

Mercedes – New Electric Car (NECAR3)

Free electric recharging in Copenhagen and Free unrestricted parking for electric vehicles in London

Land Use and Planning Solutions

Reduce journey lengths – higher use of public transport and green modes of transport

Encourage trip chaining – location of services and facilities in close proximity

Promoting high quality locations, including public transport interchanges – where people want to spend time at with facilities – transport development areas of

Land Use and Planning Solutions

Sustainable transport policy - Sustainable development

1. Development Principles2. Social Audit3. Quality Neighbourhoods

Development PrinciplesConcentration and Diversity of Activities

Less need to travel

Less reliance on the car

More use of green modes and public

transport

Vitality

Environmental security

More attractive andbetter quality town centres

Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits

Development Principles

1. Density of DevelopmentAs density increases• Average trip length reduces• Use of the car reduces• Distance travelled reducesBut causality has not been proved

2. Size of SettlementThe larger the settlement• Shorter the trips• Greater proportion of trips by public

transport• Use of car and total distance travelled

decreasesThresholds need to maintain balance between

people, jobs and a full range of facilities

3. Availability of Employment

Increases in consumption of travel by car commuting in UK is 60% from 1981-1991

• Need to put workplaces nearer to where people live, but the nature of work is changing

• Also locate workplaces in larger and public transport accessible locations

Social Audit

1.Social Costs of ClosureSavings to provider and additional costs to user

2.Social Costs of New DevelopmentBenefits to local economy and users of the new facility, extra travel (if any)

3.Development LevyOn locations inaccessible by public transport

Quality NeighbourhoodsLocations where people, public transport and

local facilities take precedence over the car• Efficient interfaces between transport modes• Non polluting local transport• Provision of local based facilities• Monitoring and control technologies to maintain

high environmental quality

Clear Zones and limited access areas - Interchange point at boundary

Streets for People

Car Free Development Gruenenstrasse in

Bremen

Transport Development Areas1. At public transport accessible locations

2. Encouragement of multi modal trips

3. Office location and retail centres at TDAs

4. Affordable housing units and car free developments

5. The new interchange points where people want to meet and spend time and money

ConclusionsImportance of land use and transport planning

1. It provides the means to tackle the causes of unsustainable transport.

2. By reducing the need to travel, it also meets social concerns about the equity of access to transport.

3. It contributes to a more efficient transport system through reductions in resource consumption and greater use of public transport and green modes of transport.

4. It improves the quality of life in cities through the creation of high quality neighbourhoods, a clean environment and enhanced accessibility.