Reconstructing Relationship Between Architecture and Contemporary Society
Transcript of Reconstructing Relationship Between Architecture and Contemporary Society
Reconstructing the Relationship between
Architecture and Contemporary Society
A dissertation submitted to the Scott Sutherland School of Architectureand Built Environment, Robert Gordon University in partial fulfilment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture/MSc AdvancedArchitectural Studied by:
Chin Chek Eng 0612725
Supervised by : Conrad Wiedermann
Scott Sutherland School, Robert Gordon University, January 2011
Page numbers
Declaration
The work submitted in this dissertation is the result of my own investigation,
except where otherwise stated. It has not already been accepted for any
degree, and is also not being concurrently submitted for any other degree.
Chin Chek Eng
31 January 2011
Page numbers
Table of Content
Abstract 05
List of Figures 07
Introduction 09
Disconnected society 12
Relational architecture 16
Literature Review
! Background and Influences 20
! In the Eyes of West
Transparency 23
Minimalism 27
Traditional Japanese Approach 31
! What is SANAA?
Unconventional Practice 33
SANAA's structure and procedures 38
Game without fixed rules 42
Case Study
! Site 44
! Transforming a Programme into Architecture 46
! De-hierarchy Spaces 53
! Fluidity and Flexibility 56
! Neutralisation of Structure and Material Use 60
Page numbers
Conclusion 63
References 66
Bibliography 69
Page numbers
Abstract
The rise of iconic buildings across the world, which arguably are the result
of society's egotism, has lead to a disconnection between society and
architecture. Architecture no longer plays a distinctive role as it did before.
This dissertation aims to raise one's awareness of this issue and to
encourage reconsideration of the role of architecture. The objective is to
identify the root of the problems mentioned above, taking SANAA as a
reference point because it claims that it creates architecture that connects
people. Its architecture will be used in a study to reflect on the problems
and form a case study for the purposes of argument and discussion.
Through web pages and journal research, recent examples of architectural
failure will be used to demonstrate the phenomena of egotism in
architecture, and from the books and lectures, the observations and ideas
of the architects in relation to this problem will be discussed and analysed
to identify the sources of the issue. Furthermore, SANAA's influence and
work will be reviewed and discussed through findings from several books
and journals by architecture critics. In order to show concrete evidence of
SANAA's design process and intention in relation to the theme, a case
study will be formed and explained through drawings and photographs with
analytical overlays.
Page numbers
The future direction of architecture programmes needs to be more fluid in
order to be compatible with a constantly changing society. As
contemporary society is evolving every day, new questions and problems
arise, and the traditional ideologies and ideas cease to function.
Architecture also needs to constantly redefine itself to target the issues at
each particular time. It is the responsibility of architects to be more sensitive
and concerned about society, to create architecture that is for people to use
rather than just being self-representation, so that its distinctive features and
capabilities can be recovered. With this continuous practice and learning, it
is hoped that architecture can reconstruct the relationships between itself
and contemporary society once again.
Page numbers
List of Figures
Fig.1 Vitra Fire Station 12
Fig.2 MIT Stata Center 12
Fig.3 Pao 21
Fig.4 Platform I 21
Fig.5 Platform II 21
Fig.6 Multiple entrances/exits in SANAA's work 21
Fig.7 Zollverein School of Management and Design in Essen 23
Fig.8 Structure neutralization 24
Fig.9 Space and function 24
Fig.10 New Museum of Contemporary Art 27
Fig.11 Aluminium-mesh detail 27
Fig.12 Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe 28
Fig.13 Glass Pavilion and Art Museum in Toledo 29
Fig.14 Plan for the 21st Century Contemporary Museum in Kanazawa 36
Fig.15 Plan for Glass Pavilion Art Museum in Toledo 36
Fig.16a SANAA's office 37
Fig.16b SANAA's office 38
Fig.17 Site plan for 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre 44
Fig.18 Proposed volume from programme required 45
Fig.19 Building shape in reference to surrounding context 46
Fig.20 Zoning 47
Fig.21 Mass volume placed at building periphery 48
Page numbers
Fig.22 View from the lake, South facade 48
Fig.23 Options that was considered 49
Fig.24 View from the city 49
Fig.25 Process of subdivision 50
Fig.26 Plan for 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre. 51
Fig.27 Circulation / gallery space brighten with skylight 53
Fig.28 Rooms connected to the lake and internal courtyard 53
Fig.29 Conceptual drawing, “park” like spaces 56
Fig.30 Roof terrace and void on first floor 57
Fig.31 Variations of circulation path in relation to door 58
Fig.32 Wall detail section 60
Fig.33 View at evening, showing the transparency of the building 61
Page numbers
Introduction
According to the recent observations of Paolo Baratta (Sejima 2010 p.12),
“it seems that there is a prevailing use of architecture as art for self
representation and self celebration.” This perceived selfishness has led to a
disconnection between architecture and contemporary society. “Alterations
to the architectural program” as suggested by Yuko Hasegawa, (Sejima
2010 p.28) are essential in order to dissolve and refine the complexity of
architectural issues and the connection between people and architecture.
This dissertation aims to suggest that there is a concern regarding such
disconnection, and an urge towards change in architectural programs that is
compatible with contemporary society; to raise the awareness of one's new
sensibility and perception of architecture's possibilities rather than its
conventions; to provoke one's reconsideration in architectural programs
regarding the importance of the public or users, rather than heteronomy; to
redefine the important role of architecture in contemporary society.
The objectives of this dissertation are to identify the disconnection between
architecture and contemporary society; to use SANAA's architecture as part
of a study in this dissertation, because SANAA is an architecture practice
that claims it has manipulated architectural programmes and made
architecture that connects with people; at the same time, it has been
Page numbers
recognised by several critics, sociologists, and philosophers that SANAA's
buildings have met the needs of contemporary society. In order to support
the argument, a case study of SANAA's project is formed to reflect upon
these issues, while showing that the aims of this dissertation can be
achieved and how SANAA's projects may be considered as the model for
the future potential in architecture.
Firstly, the phenomena of how architecture can be overshadowed by
selfishness and how this has affects contemporary society, will be
discussed with the support of two examples. This phenomena will be
further analysed and its sources and causes identified in order to suggest
an alternative and strong solution. In relation to these issues, SANAA will be
introduced and the reason it is chosen as a reference to study in this
dissertation will be discussed.
Secondly, in order to analyse and summarise SANAA's work, the
backgrounds of Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa, who formed SANAA,
will be studied in order to trace their roots and influences, which have
predominantly affected their direction and approach in their latter
architecture compared to that of other architects. A literature review is
included, involving books by a number of architecture critics who define
Page numbers
SANAA's style as transparent, minimal, traditionally Japanese and as a
reinterpretation of Miesian. All of these works will be referenced and
discussed to identify which approach is most visible in SANAA's oeuvre.
Thirdly, an in depth case study of the 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural
Centre in Almere will be formed to provide further analysis of SANAA's
work. I was fortunate enough to experience this building, which is SANAA's
second completed building in Europe, during my internship in 2009. In the
case study, the experience of the 'De Kunstlinie' will be broken down into
sections and SANAA's approach will be discussed and explained using
drawings and photographs with analytical overlays.
Finally, the conclusion will state the effects of SANAA's architecture on the
world and whether SANAA's approach can be considered as the model for
architecture in contemporary society, based on the findings in the literature
review and the case study.
Page numbers
Disconnected society
Recent overviews of modern architecture have identified a trend towards a
design of self representation and self celebration. As Castle (2001 p. 5)
says, “it seems to be everything for everyone who wants it.” People are
making architecture for fame; making architecture for wealth, making
architecture for power; for example, in the case of Zaha Hadid's Vitra Fire
Station (Hadid 2011 fig.1), which “was a formal success but a functional
failure.” (Dyckhoff 2009) Even though Hadid proclaimed herself as a de-
constructivist, whose designs are based on the principal of functionalism, it
could be argued that she pursued the abstract form for the sake of
promoting her work, as the building was filled with sharp edginess and
corners, design features which had no practical purpose, and this led to the
closure of the fire station. Another case is that of the MIT Stata Center
(Evans 2007 fig.2), which is perceived as a “party of drunken robots”,
facing the problems of “leaking, crackling and sprouting mold” (Evans 2007)
and the renowned architect, Frank Gehry and the construction firm were
sued for the reason that they “failed to live up to their contracts and are
responsible for the Stata amphitheater's structural problems”. These are
some examples of how egotism in contemporary society has overshadowed
the true quality in architecture.
This situation does not just appear in individual architectural practice but on
Page numbers
Fig.1 Vitra Fire Station Fig.2 MIT Stata Center
a larger scale, including the planning authority which has the “power” to
decide the future direction of architecture in the UK. For example,
environmental sustainability became a norm after the set up of 2050 Zero
Carbon target development which can be seen as a scale to measure good
architecture, making the most of the architects setting their targets solely
towards environmental issues to meet this new rules; the importance of
Zero Carbon development for the future has been stressed to the young
future architects in universities to the exclusion of other equally important
factors such as social issues and cultural traditions. Unequivocally,
environmental issues represent an important position in architecture, but
architecture is much more complex when other issues such as social,
political, economic and cultural factors are taken into consideration. The
emphasis on these particular elements in architecture has made most of the
architects lose sight of other important issues and therefore, many
meaningless, cheap, sensational, or heteronomous buildings have been
created across the world.
Page numbers
The design of buildings based purely on one's desire means that the
buildings convey one's power or territory. The buildings become iconic
when people can only stare at but not interact with them. In this sense, the
buildings have become disconnected from people. This trend is contrary to
the purpose of architecture programs, which was to accommodate human
activities or events when traced back to an earlier age. These programs
were evident in important buildings such as churches or pantheons. The
space and function of the buildings was open to the public, people sharing
the space, and exchanging information. How did architecture evolve to the
current state where it is detached from people? Robin Evans (1997 p.88)
analyses the evolvement of architecture during different periods in his
books, Translation from Drawing to Building and Other Essays, and
concludes that during the nineteenth century, the “society that finds
carnality distasteful, ...sees... privacy is habitual.” Following the rise in
people's desire and demand for privacy and conventional norms, they can
afford to have their own things including space, leaving a clear boundary
between oneself and another. The architectural programs have shifted from
accommodating man's interaction to man's privacy. Isolation was born and
the social network has been dismantled, as David Page (2010) described in
a 5710 lecture, leading to the isolation of humans, with the division of
cubicles in order to obtain private space for oneself. Accordingly
Page numbers
the wasted corridor space for circulation from one space to another has
been substantially integrated as a solution; however, the hierarchy of space
is generated where the corridor space has less priority to be filled with
natural light, compared to the cubicles which one spends the most time in;
claustrophobia is generated and artificial lights are used as a solution, as
though humans are creating problems and providing a solution for them, yet
generating another problem. Ultimately, complex questions and answers
have been generated and a series of systems has been created: so called
“planning”. The alteration of architectural programs is essential in order to
dissolve and refine the complexity of architectural issues and the
connection between people and architecture.
Page numbers
Relational Architecture
SANAA, a Tokyo based architectural practice formed by Kazuyo Sejima and
Ryue Nishizawa, proclaim that they have been spending twenty years in
altering architectural programs to create architecture's “border”, which
forms a “connection” with people and activities rather than creating a
division, minimising the presence of architecture itself, and expunging
egotism in their architecture. (MUSAC 2007 pp.13-14) SANAA have
consistently retained these principles and approaches throughout their
career, building resolute architecture not only across Japan but in Europe
and America, and they have received numerous awards, particularly in 2010
when they were awarded the Pritzker Prize, which is known throughout the
world as the highest honour in architecture. In order to gain such accolades,
they must have developed expertise and skills in creating architecture that
is recognised by Toyo Ito as an “exception”. Iseku Hasegawa is convinced
that they have “the potential to start a social revolution” and to become
accepted by the world. (Feireiss 2006 p.39)
Their architecture did not receive much appreciation in the West ten years
ago compared to the present, as the disconnection of the social network
was not obvious at that time in the West. Moreover, Western architecture
was greatly influenced by the Modern planning theory, which “was
predicted on the work of cutting and dividing the pure, ordered internal
Page numbers
world from the chaotic external world and on the act of leaving a clear
boundary between internal and the external.” (Sejima 2010 p.29) However,
planning has never been completely capable of anticipating the fluidity of
contemporary society, which is determined by people's constantly shifting
choices and actions. Eventually, the public have come to realise the need to
incorporate innovative architecture programs in contemporary society,
which may be found in the uniqueness of SANAA's buildings, which
awakens people's awareness of their interaction with architecture.
This uniqueness has always been misunderstood by conventional critics,
who draw their conclusions based mainly on atmosphere, style, and
aesthetic. The architects have never intended to produce and implement
their works based on such factors, but rather on their complicated working
method, which takes cues from the society itself, such as the program from
the client, plot size and condition, and budget. Accordingly, they came up
with multiple solutions for the social issues, all imbricated together to form
the concept. In other words, the architectural programs have constantly
altered and developed to suit contemporary society's needs. As they only
deal with social issues, SANAA seem to has the desire to “erase all traces
of [itself] from what” it created. (Cited Feireiss 2006 p.48) What SANAA
trying to create perhaps is just an ordinary product that “without
Page numbers
seeking to express themselves or their age, or even to hold their ground
against the products of the competition, or forgeries”, (Fukasawa &
Morrison 2007 p.9) is an ordinary product that needs the users to give it a
meaning and function; suggesting that their building is never complete
without society to interact with and use the building, and at the same time a
connection between society and architecture is re-established. For this
reason, Yuko Hasegawa views SANAA's approach as “simply want[ing] to
place the architecture and observe what will happen, rather than predicting
and planning what effect it will have on the surrounding environment.”
(Cited in Sejima 2010 p.42) Thus, this ordinary product has become so
ordinary that it stands out compared to the others, and has become “super
normal”, something that is even less than ordinary and not extraordinary.
After so many years of practice and experience of searching and creating
architecture that provokes interaction, SANAA has realised a multitude of
buildings with new and creative programs that incorporate current
technology. It is concluded by Kristine Guzman (MUSAC 2007 p.173) that to
some extent, the buildings create new social behaviour that is “acceptable
to the most conservative of cultures”, which does not arouse any
controversy, unlike most of the post war modernist buildings in the
1950s. In order to examine the statement above, whether or not SANAA has
Page numbers
succeeded the previous generation of architects and has invented
architecture that is compatible with the needs of the present time, the
background and works of Sejima and Nishizawa will be further explored and
analysed in the literature review.
Page numbers
Literature Review
Background and Influences
The environment that one grows up in influences and affects one's life.
Japan suffered vast destruction and desperately sought for recovery to its
original state after WW II. Modernism seemed to be the most convincing
path to take as it applied the concepts of rationality and enlightenment,
resisting ornamentation, and mass, quick production. Architecture had
officially moved into the “Machine age” which was part of Modernism;
however, the Modernist movement soon reached its peak and a return to
traditional values was considered by some architects. The early 1960s were
the first time when Japanese Modernism started to manifest itself. Kisho
Kurokawa started the Metabolist movement to counteract the Modernist
movement, which conceived machines as architecture; Arata Isozaki had
established the basis of an alternative version of Japanese architecture.
(Knabe and Noennig 1999 pp.9-16) Sejima lived and grew up in this time
when Japanese architecture started to blossom. Accordingly, she can be
said to have truly experienced the influence and effects of the Post War
Modernist transformation, whereas Nishizawa is a child of the mid sixties
and this places him in another generation. It could be argued that Sejima is
the one who is influenced by the Japanese modernism from the past, yet in
spite of her age, is much closer to the younger generation and “may look to
some people as though [she is] liberated from the past.” (Cecilia and Levene
Page numbers
2001 p.24)
As Sejima was an apprentice and as Nishizawa was one of Toyo Ito's
interns, it is not hard to see the echoes of Ito in Sejima's and Nishizawa's
work. Even when she was a student, Sejima admired Ito, who succeeded
the Kenzo Tange generation which followed the movement of Le Corbusier.
Ito innovatively created lightweight ephemeral structures to accommodate
the major issue in Japan: the shortage of land with an extremely high
population, facing booming inflation in land prices. (Feireiss 2006 p.46) Ito's
work, “Pao” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.26 fig.3), a vernacular mobile unit
which is designed as a “vision of a life for the Urban Nomad” (Wikipedia
2010) covered in fabric, caused Sejima to rethink the concept of
architecture. She challenged “the way in which 'Pao' tried to seal off of the
individual from urban surroundings... an architect should put up structures
that serve to mutually incorporate people, city and information or media.”
(Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.25) Platform I and II (Cecilia and Levene 2001
p.26 fig. 4, 5), Sejima's earliest independent commission as Sejima
Associates might appear to be another version of Pao in terms of the light
structure and transparency, but the fundamental concept behind it was the
complete opposite, a concept inspired by station platforms, where people
can freely pass through without any fixed orientation. Nishizawa was
Page numbers
interested and impressed by the Platform, and joined her to refine and
further explore new architectural ideas. Eventually, the name of Sejima and
Nishizawa and Associates (SANAA) was established. The core concept
displayed in Platform I and II can still be easily perceived in SANAA's work,
yet it is expressed in an even more obvious and direct manner in. In recent
SANAA's works, (Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.88,146,178 fig.6) all of the
designs have multiple entrances/exits and blurred boundaries between the
building and the site. SANAA has succeeded in inheriting and reinterpreting
Ito's idea into its own language, created architecture that open to the
society and provided them freedom.
Fig.3 Pao Fig.4 Platform I Fig.5 Platform II
Fig.6 Multiple entrances/exits in SANAA's work.
Page numbers
In the eyes of the West
Transparency
If one evaluates Japanese architecture based on the standards of the West,
one is in “danger of overvaluing the aesthetic aspects and thereby literally
only scratching the surface” (Schittich 2002 p.9), as Japanese architecture
possesses Western modernism's form, but tradition and customs have
always carried the most weight in Japan. Therefore, one must see Japanese
architecture from another perspective and not only from the Western
tradition's evaluation, which is based on clear and monumental form. This
judgement is likewise applicable to SANAA. There is no denying that its
buildings are finished with transparent quality, and 'transparency' is the
word that best describes SANAA's works. However, this quality is totally
different from that of architects who obtain transparency in spaces by using
glass, such as Steven Holl or Peter Zumthor. It is indeed significant that
transparent materials are employed in SANAA's work; nevertheless,
transparency is not Sejima's and Nishizawa's “ultimate goals”; what is
important “is to organize the components in a clear way.” (Cited Cecilia and
Levene 2007 p.33) Yet their finished buildings all lead to transparency, even
a concrete building such as the Zollverein School of Management and
Design (Kung 2007 p.87 fig.7). What is the true meaning behind making
buildings transparent? Is it just as simple as merely making the connection
between surroundings and the interior spaces? What does transparency
Page numbers
really mean for SANAA? And what do they hope to gain by achieving
transparency?
Fig.7 Zollverein School of Management and Design in Essen
Sejima says that she is looking for “some kind of transparency without
transparent material. So not literal transparency, but through for example
some kind of planning method...” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.17) How could
organising the planning lead to transparency? The definition of transparency
for Sejima and Nishizawa has to be established to understand any of their
works. Nishizawa's definition of transparency uses traditional Japanese
houses as an example, where the structures are made with very thin and
Page numbers
light material which could be very similar to the door or partition wall (fig.8).
All the elements become homogeneous and the structures are not so
obvious and therefore the presence of structure is neutralised, which leads
to transparency. Another example can be connected to the utilisation of
space, wherein the same room can be used for various purposes (fig.9); it
can be a living room, dining room, or bedroom. The space and functions are
all concatenated, so the relationship between them does not have a clear
boundary to define the function of the space and become “transparent”.
Thus, the meaning of the space is always fluid and decided by the users.
Fig.8 Structure neutralization Fig.9 Space and function
The transparency that Sejima and Nishizawa seek could be seen as a
phenomenological transparency, where the relationship between elements in
Page numbers
architecture has been blurred or dissolved, but several critics or architects
have misinterpreted the concept of transparency as meaning that the
elements are transparent or the element is removed from the space. Rather,
the conventional element's character is displaced into something else. This
is the planning method that SANAA manipulates to create transparency in a
building, through eliminating or connecting the different boundaries or
elements in the environment, which are intended to evoke one's senses
within the space and create interaction between them. Hence, the
architecture and society could be connected through SANAA's transparency,
wherein the boundaries between architecture and society are dissolved.
Page numbers
In the eyes of the West
Minimalism
SANAA's works have often been compared with those of Ludwig Mies van
der Rohe, one of the most influential exponents in minimal modernism, who
adopted the motto “less is more”; whose architecture's approach is
regarded by Mark Wigley (Morrill and Larner 2009 p.37) as “reducing
everything down to the least elements.” Despite the fact that Japanese
architecture shouldn't only be viewed with regard to its aesthetic value,
minimalism perhaps best describes SANAA, because its works have an
obvious reduction in the structure, wall thickness, and colour. However, the
intention behind this reduction was to achieve “transparency”. Another
strong point is that minimalism also sees ornamentation as “a crime”
according to Adolf Loos (2010 p.3) In that sense, SANAA is not minimalist
because some of its works have committed “the crime”. It does not remove
unnecessary elements such as ornamentation, but rather the ornamentation
is integrated into the buildings. For example, in its recent work, the New
Museum of Contemporary Art in New York (Archinfo 2011 fig.10), aluminium
meshed skins were carefully designed to the desire scale and proportion,
cladded onto the building's facade in order to soften the building's exterior
within the context. The ornamentation (Baan 2011 fig.11) became necessary
for SANAA as it would affect the whole surroundings and the perception of
the building. One “must therefore view the minimalism of SANAA's aesthetic
Page numbers
rather as a reduction” as Kung (2007 p.5) suggests. In addition, the
architects are concerned with the environment where people live and aim to
connect the building with it and provide a sense of place that belongs to it.
Consequently, SANAA's architecture should be viewed together with the
environment as a whole and not only as an aesthetic.
Fig.10 New Museum of Contemporary Art
Fig.11 Aluminium-mesh detail
Page numbers
Van der Rohe's concept of minimalism, inspired by X-rays during the 19th
century, has raised controversial issues. His design of Farnsworth House
(Costa 2010 p.25 fig.12), was criticised by the owner, Edith Farnsworth due
to its lack of privacy and intimacy in a house, which is supposed to be a
highly private building. She stated in an interview that “Mies talks about
“free space”: but his space is very fixed. I can't even put a clothes hanger in
my house without considering how it affects everything from the outside.
Any arrangement of furniture becomes a major problem, because the house
is transparent, like an X-ray.” (Cite Costa 2010 p.25) On the contrary, the
transparency of SANAA is accepted by the public and does not cause the
same issues as Van der Rohe's did. Sejima and Nishizawa can be said to be
aware of the problem and distinguish between their works and formal
minimalism, which exposes the structure and interior of the building like an
X-ray and which may result in a rigid and fixed space.
Fig.12 Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe
Page numbers
SANAA's Intervention in the Mies van der Rohe Pavilion, Costa (2010 p.22)
has established that SANAA has “inherited the Miesian tradition of radical
transparency” and has reproduced the Pavilion with the understanding that
what is important by using glass is not its clearness, but the reflection it
gives. (Costa 2010 p.26) SANAA takes the manipulation of reflection to the
extreme in the Glass Pavilion in Toledo (Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.91
fig.13); the glass walls not only have a layering of reflection on the outside
as well as on the inside, but they are not in a linear straight line as in the
minimal style; instead they curve and ultimately create a mirage effect.
Exposing structure is not the objective, but to provide privacy for people
while maintaining the interaction between the public, visitors, the
surroundings and the building.
Fig.13 Glass Pavilion and Art Museum in Toledo
Page numbers
In the eyes of the West
Traditional Japanese Approach
One may surmise that, if Sejima and Nishizawa are not minimalist, perhaps
their approach is related to traditional Japanese architecture, since they
have been influenced by and grew up in that environment. Furthermore, the
architects have used the example of traditional Japanese houses to define
the transparency in their work. Nevertheless, in the interview with Cortes
(Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.8), Nishizawa stated that they have “never
quoted” from the traditional Japanese architecture. However, SANAA's
architecture can be perceived easily by outsiders using the concept of
“ma”. Kevin Nute, (2004 p.11, 71) who is a professor of Architecture,
analyses the traditional Japanese room in his book Place, Time and Being
in Japanese Architecture, in which he states that it has the quality of interval
between built space and time, described as “ma”. In relation to this, SANAA
is interested in creating public space that gives users the freedom to
circulate and perform activities at will; the concept behind it was inspired by
the “park”, which “offers something for everybody and can absorb different
generations, people of different social backgrounds, individuals or groups”
(Feireiss 2006 p.62). In this manner, the meaning of space is generated in
time, as a space may be used for different activities at different times.
This tradition has influenced SANAA but it is ambiguous, as the architects
Page numbers
themselves never refer to it. Is this concept perhaps unconsciously
implemented in the work by the architects during the process of designing
(as they have been working in Japan throughout their lives and have been
influenced by the environment)? Or did they disregard the past, history and
design architecture ignoring the context? In a conversation between Taki
and Sejima, she says: “I don't accept them (history and tradition) wholesale,
but instead try to start by rethinking assumptions that have been taken
almost completely for granted.” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.24) This
suggests that, rather than largely ignoring the past, SANAA's work has
evolved from it, but still preserves and reinterprets the quality of the past,
creating even more distinctive architecture in contemporary society.
The topics discussed in this chapter relate to SANAA to some extent, for
the reason that Japanese architecture was influenced by Western
Modernism and merged with traditionalism to form “a universal concept and
method which would be completely Japanese” yet “applicable
internationally.” (Cited Knabe and Noennig 1999 p.10) However, after so
many years of refinement, Japanese architecture has evolved to a state
where its roots are hard to distinguish. SANAA's architecture too has
evolved to an unprecedented state, whereby it cannot be compared with
the past. Therefore, it should not associate with any style or past because
SANAA designs only by considering the present society needs.
Page numbers
What is SANAA?
Unconventional Practice
An architectural style can be perceived and differentiated from other styles
by its form, material and structure. SANAA do not express their architecture
through any of the above aspects, as Sejima says “for us it is important to
explain the intrinsic relationships of each project quite clearly … to show the
idea clearly, not through figure, or form but by the most simple and direct
way.” (Cited Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.33) It can be said that Sejima and
Nishizawa are not devoted to any particular architectural style, nor are they
searching for or intending to generate one. They try to steer clear of
architectural style, as it is formed by individual experience and perception,
which “is so dependant on emotional and other variables out of our control
that, as an architectural study, it very quickly forms an end in itself.” (Cecilia
and Levene 2001 p.13) What did SANAA base its work on if it is not based
on the perception of individuals? How can SANAA not have their own
perceptions in making architecture?
It is perhaps more suitable for someone who has had direct contact with
SANAA to answer these questions. Florian Idenburgh, who worked for
SANAA for 8 years, held the position of project architect for the New
Museum of Contemporary Arts in New York and was appointed to
coordinate the exhibition: SANAA Works 1998-2008 in New York. In his
Page numbers
introduction to the exhibition, Idenburgh said:
“I think the office doesn't have a style as much as a method. There is a
certain desire : do not go with conventional wisdom within architecture, so
we always question every function and the usage... So definitely there is a
constant questioning of what a space is; what a space can be; and what are
the conventions of the space and is there a new way to enjoy this
experience? ...literally how certain activities organize in relation to one
another. The choice of material, the detailing, the choices of colour or
anything else are always in support of the organisation or activities. “ (New
Museum 2010)
From the statement above, it appears that SANAA's way of working is to go
against convention, which involves the process of rethinking and
reinterpreting the relationship between function and space. Based on this
programmatic approach, the perception of the individual is avoided. On the
other hand, SANAA must have formed a perception to identify what a
conventional space is like in order to prevent creating one. However, in the
book SANAA Serpentine Gallery Pavilion 2009, Nishizawa writes : “we try
not to select options for which we can already imagine the outcome. In
other words, we try to select the direction with the most possibilities.”
(Morrill and Larner 2009 p.25) If this is true, it can be argued that, with the
Page numbers
choices of possibility that can resist conventional ideas, Sejima and
Nishizawa chose a direction for finished space that could not be imagined
as a preconceived idea, and therefore the influence of individual perception
on the end product was dismissed.
The 21st Century Kanazawa Contemporary Art Museum (Futagawa 2005
p.116 fig.14) is a good case in point. The exhibition rooms with different
proportions and daylight were separated and organised close to one
another to form a streetscape and enclosed in a transparent cylinder. The
visitors can stroll freely in this space and have the option to go to the
exhibition, where they can have indirect contact with other art works. This
can be said to go against the conventional structure of a museum, which
normally has a large span of free space and partitions to divide the required
space.
In addition, the walls in the Glass Pavilion and Art Museum in Toledo
(Futagawa 2005 p.150 fig.15) do not possess the usual characteristic of
walls, which are normally used to divide up spaces that are always in one
component whether the walls are made out of brick, concrete, or plaster
board with or without insulation. The Glass Pavilion's walls have been
expanded into a buffer zone, which is formed by two layers of glass, like a
Page numbers
bubble. Did SANAA resist the conventional for the sake of just wanting to be
different, when it could have maximised the floor area for a larger space
with conventional methods (with just a thin glass wall)? And why did it have
to create an 80cm thick air gap in-between? The reasons for SANAA's
unconventional approach are practical ones; the new walls' concept is
intended to meet the requirements of building and sound insulation.
Moreover, it can create closer relationships for people who are working in
the room with people who are nearby.
This unconventional method in architecture does not intend to suggest an
against to conventional approach, but to consider every aspect in designing
the building as equally important as a means of inventing high quality new
architecture, while in itself, delivering a message to world, asking people to
rethink architecture with regard to convention: is this the only way to create
architecture? Or are there better possibilities?
Page numbers
Fig.14 Plan for the 21st Century Contemporary Museum in Kanazawa
Fig.15 Plan for Glass Pavilion and Art Museum in Toledo
Page numbers
Structure and Procedures
By looking at an architect's office, visitors can have a clear idea of what the
architect's work looks like. Even though SANAA is a collaboration between
Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa, they still maintain their own practices:
Kazuyo Sejima Office and Ryue Nishizawa Office, for handling small
residential projects. Sejima and Nishizawa, together with the other members
of SANAA, are working in a very open environment, where their three offices
are connected in an open space (Kung 2007 p.8-9 fig.16a, 16b ). The centre
part of the office is a meeting place, a living space, or a model displaying
area. Everyone is involved in all the projects, as Nishizawa says “it is
important for people who work here to be connected to the other projects
that do not relate directly to them.” (MUSAC 2007 p.10)
Fig.16a SANAA's office
Page numbers
In a common office structure, the hierarchy normally consists of the Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) or director at the top to control or decide everything
relating to the organisation; however, SANAA’s office structure is rather
open, as every SANAA member has an equal position while working on the
projects and gives opinions and directions. Sejima and Nishizawa consider
everyone's ideas and work together to create totally new architecture,
pushing every different aspect in buildings (structure, construction,
functions and circulation etc.) to the limit, or perhaps beyond the limit. In
other words, the possibilities of architecture are being explored to the
maximum.
Fig.16b SANAA's office
Page numbers
It could be said that SANAA works in an open and democratic way; as
Idenburgh suggests, “the way they work and the way they are, as people-
extremely accessible, extremely personal and really architecture just
becomes fun as they are just doing their hobbies and its not about work,
not about power, not about money... Its very much a practice in which
collectively ideas are brought to the table and Sejima and Nishizawa
function as an editor or curator of these ideas, and they pick the right ones,
and they combine them and they mould them, and they push them towards
certain directions.” (New Museum 2010) Despite that, how can SANAA be
so sure that they have picked the “right one” of all the possible ideas? Is it
just as simple as the outcome that they cannot imagine, as discussed in the
previous section? The process used in deciding this direction may be
questionable and needs to be clarified.
Sejima and Nishizawa have a sensitivity towards the reality of life in society.
Based on features such as plot shape and condition and client's wishes,
they develop their own ideas and solutions from their observations. All the
ideas are connected to their schematic drawings and converted with
“brutality” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.337) into physical buildings. This is
quite obvious in their works where the “detailed drawing looked like original
diagrams”.(Rattenbury 2006 p.18) During the process of combining the
Page numbers
solutions to form the diagram and turning it into a physical building,
discussions occur between the architects and the team members, clients,
city officials and independent consultants, which then turn into “local rules
or 'regulations' to define the building.” (MUSAC 2007 p.16) SANAA
members adhere to and work within the boundaries of these agreed rules.
However, this is not sufficient to make a final decision on the building
design, as there are innumerable possibilities. The architects themselves do
not know which is the best solution, so they simply test all the possibilities
that they can think of, with a large number of plans and models as studies,
to decide different scales, proportions, allocation of different functions, and
so on. This methodology is repeated until the buildings are well defined and
no detail is left unexamined or unattended. However, this process cannot
prove that SANAA has picked the “right choice”, but rather within the range
of possibilities, it has chosen a stronger and more effective concept for its
projects.
Page numbers
Game without fixed rules
One might argue that SANAA's way of designing architecture is “purely
experimental” (Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.21), “playing the game with
unknown factors in the program”(MUSAC 2007 p.182) without any
constricting expectation as to the end result. This might indeed be true;
however, ironically, this is also the way that any new architecture can be
invented too. It is dissimilar to what modernist architects normally do, where
the work is expected to have a certain quality of closure, where the rules in
architectural games are fixed. Contrastingly, SANAA's buildings simply
reveal themselves in time, and they can only be complete when they relate
to the environment surrounding them; when the meaning and function of the
space is given by the users. The continuous process that SANAA has taken
is like a process of “purification” (MUSAC 2007 p.171); the complexity of
different issues is layered together and simplified until the essence of the
scheme is discovered. With this flexible methodology in making
architecture, SANAA has won several such 'games' in different countries.
SANAA's approach can be described as almost like that of a scientist or
inventor, experimenting with different space arrangements to achieve the
new experiential space of forms, but using a more artistic intuition rather
than mathematical numbers as fact. As Nishizawa said in an interview, “one
difference between architecture and mathematics is that there is only one
Page numbers
mathematical solution, whereas in architecture there does not have to be
just one, ... You can take different paths and arrive at different solutions.”
(Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.22) There are no correct answers in architecture,
as there are so many architectural theories that can be used to create
different perspectives. The main objective should be that the building
functions according to the environment and people using it, because
architecture requires “the interaction with place and people over long
periods of time that really give it meaning.” (Feireiss 2006 p.44).
SANAA treats each project as a new start, nothing is quoted directly from
any precedent such as traditional Japanese architecture, architectural
theories or previous projects. “Each project ends up using different criteria
to decide ... each project is decided case by case” (Cecilia and Levene
2001 p.20). However, in all the works of SANAA, whether they are in
different places, building types, or scales, through the working process its
works have produced notably similar qualities that provoke sensibilities
other than purely visual. These core principles, such as turning a
programme into architecture, de-hierarchy spaces, structures and
circulation will be analysed further in the case study of SANAA's work at
Almere, 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre, to discuss how SANAA
targets the issues in that project and connects the architecture with the
environment and people once again.
Page numbers
Case Study -'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre
Site
Almere is a new town located in the East of Amsterdam on artificially
reclaimed land and is one of the youngest cities in the Netherlands with a
population of approximately 110,000. With the rapid population growth, it
has been projected that by 2030, the number of inhabitants in Almere will
have increased up to 350,000. In 1994 Rem Koolhaas implemented a
masterplan in Almere to improve the population flow with a diagonal
shopping district and high rise buildings close to the train station; this was
intended to give the town a more familiar urban edge and provide a sense
of place with a movie theatre and a cultural centre building to give an urban
identity to the town. (Koolhaas 2003 pp.12-38, 70-75)
The site (Google 2011 fig.17) for the new cultural centre and movie theatre
is situated at the southern end of Almere's new town on the waterfront side,
where the Northern edge of the Weerwater Lake is. SANAA won the
competition organised by the municipality of Almere, merging the movie
theatre and cultural centre, which share the same cultural facility, into a
single volume building rather than two separate buildings. By doing so, it
could encourage the interaction between professional performers and local
amateurs, and create an opportunity to explore the possibilities of the multi-
layered brief. (Slessor 2007 p.79)
Page numbers
Fig.17 Site plan for 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre
Page numbers
From city centre shopping district
Weerwater Lake
New waterfront development
High rise apartment
Transforming a Programme into Architecture
The requirement for the movie theatre was a complex facility consisting of a
600 to 1100 capacity large auditorium, a 350 capacity auditorium, and a
150 capacity performance room, whereas the cultural centre required a
series of studios catering for “music, painting, sculpture, drama, dance and
computer.” (Fig.18) (Futagawa 2005 p.99)
Fig.18 Proposed volume from programme required
“It's not possible to go from programme to architecture in one leap. It's not
possible to use programme as a generating logic for architecture... So each
project ends up using different criteria to decide exactly which room goes
where; each project is decided case by case. Nothing predominant; not
aesthetics, construction details, regulations, nor the amenity of the interior.
You just pull out all of the smallest and the largest reasons for everything.
They get layered or pulled together into many different patterns, and then
you can make a decision.” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.20)
Page numbers
SANAA made use of the programmes and targeted the issues that were
raised in the new urban plan of Almere; the new town with a new urban
interaction between identity and activity, and a new type of cultural centre
and art complex. (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.288) In response, SANAA took
the mass that generated from the programme to form an interaction
between the landscape and the city; providing the cultural complex with
the image of public friendly architecture which can become similar to a
park, naturally encouraging the “exchange of information and encounters of
various sorts”. (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.289) In other words, the
architects sought to merge the two programs into one building, creating a
more intense urban interaction, and used this “programmatic duality to
manifest itself in the shape of the building” (Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.65)
in reference to the horizontal surface of the lake and the high, large building
mass of the surrounding buildings. (Fig.19)
Fig.19 Building shape in reference to surrounding context
In an interview with SANAA from Shinkenchiku (2010), Sejima said: “For the
outside, I thought about how it floats on a lake or how its façade appears
Page numbers
towards the city. Yet things that we thought about the inside have not come
to the outside. I would like to connect those. I want to close the gap
between an architecture that you can realise outside and an architecture
that you experience from inside. I want to continuously combine how we
think about the overall environment and how we think of... programme.”
Using SANAA's ideas, based on the client's requirements, the programme
was organised all on a single floor to create a very accessible building to
promote interactions. The functions that involved public use, such as the
movie theatre, cafe, gallery and foyer were organised and placed towards
the North where the city is, while the programme to be used for specific
activities, such as rehearsals, lectures and painting, was placed near the
South, where it faced the artificial lake. (Fig.20) (Cecilia and Levene 2001
p.291)
Fig.20 Zoning
However this is only the interaction within the building itself, and not the
interaction between the city and the building from the exterior. The need to
create such an interaction between building and city resulted in a building
Page numbers
Weerwater Lake CityPrivate Public
that projected itself as a 108m x 90m single low-rise rectangular volume
floating on the water with three mass volumes (large auditorium, small
auditorium and performance room with office tower) raised up, standing
boldly at three edges of the horizontal plane in response to the city, (Baan
2011 Fig.21) and on the South facade (Baan 2011 Fig.22), it has a low and
horizontal characteristic as a reaction to the lake. (Futagawa 2005 p.99) This
was planned rather than placing all the functions together into a large urban
block, or minimising the presence of the building with an underground
theatre that would have a horizontal building. (Fig.23)
Fig.21 Mass volume placed at building periphery
Fig.22 View from the lake, South facade
Page numbers
Fig.23 Options that was considered
Fig.24 View from the city
From the city viewpoint, the three vertical masses can be seen from most
vantage points within the city (Tan 2011 fig.24); from some viewpoints, the
sight lines can slip discretely through the gaps between these masses. The
emphasis of the horizontal extension space over the water can be seen
from the entrance and clarifies the extreme edge of the city. On the other
hand, at the view from the waterside, the emphasis is on the beginning of
the city and the thin plane floating on the water. (Cecilia and Levene 2001
p.288)
Page numbers
'De Kunstlinie'
The programmes that consist of a large volume of theatre space and small
compartments for various functions, such as smaller performances,
rehearsals and administration, were made up of a replication of rectangular
boxes. It was organised like a patchwork that began with fractal geometry
(Fig.25) . All the small rooms were subdivided into smaller required sizes
and placed in an orderly pattern, close together to “bring within a single
building the co-existence of all sorts of individualities.” (Cecilia and Levene
2001 p.289) This method of organisation can increase the interaction and
relation between artists from various fields, such as painters, dancers and
musicians. At the same time, each of them can work independently in their
private space while close to nature, the lake or the courtyard (Futagawa
2005 p.98 fig.26), and have an interaction with the surroundings. In this way,
the outside is connected with the inside. Moreover, by revealing the
activities in the cultural centre, an image and identity for the culture and
urbanity of Almere is created. 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre
can be considered as architecture that represents Almere, which fully shows
the character and identity of Almere by linking the city, nature and culture
together.
Fig.25 Process of subdivision
Page numbers
Fig.26 Plan for 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Centre
Page numbers
1 Entrance 8 Patio 15 Children art studio2 Foyer 9 Pop music studio 16 Sculpture and 3d 3 Large auditorium 10 Percussion studio 17 Ceramic studio4 Loading bay 11 Sound studio 18 Performance room5 Small auditorium 12 Computer room 19 Theatre restaurant6 Music room 13 Photograph/video studio 20 Drama studio7 Ensemble 14 Painting room 21 Dance studio
Water
City
De-hierarchy Spaces
In one of SANAA's lectures in New York, Sejima told the audience to
consider every space's quality, treating every space impartially, as the
space for minor functions is just as important as the space used for the
main function of the building. (Slessor 2007 p.79)
This principle is likewise employed in the Theatre and Cultural Centre. The
architects sought to create a space that obliterates “hierarchy: there is no
difference, philosophically or physically, between the art gallery, the deep
blue theatre, the classrooms and the entrance spaces; all are equal.” (Morrill
and Larner 2009 p.72) A corridor space has always been treated as a lower
hierarchy space because it is considered merely as a tool for linking the
rooms, thus natural sunlight and ventilation are disregarded in the corridor.
In 'De Kunstlinie', the corridor space is eliminated and replaced by a
circulation space, which is lightened up with natural light.
When considering one's movement through a space from the outside
towards the inside of a building, it may be observed that one is moving from
a bright space into a dark interior space. This “produces a hierarchical
distinction.” (Cecilia and Levene 2007 p.19) SANAA has fed the light into
this single level deep plan through skylights that are covered in translucent
perspex (Sketelenburg 2011 fig.27) and through internal courtyards that are
Page numbers
scattered around. The result is not only a hierarchy free, bright, natural
space within the building, but a space that can make one feel close to the
surroundings, the city and the lake. (Baan 2011 fig.28)
Fig.27 Circulation / gallery space brighten with skylight
Fig.28 Rooms connected to the lake and internal courtyard
Furthermore to strengthen the idea of equal space, white colour and
reflective material have often been used here, as well as in other SANAA
projects. White can be said to be the ideal colour for the art museum or
Page numbers
gallery as it doesn't dominate the important features of the artwork; rather, it
highlights the artwork. Sejima explained in a lecture in Taiwan that the
reason she used white colour in architecture is not only to meet the
requirement of creating a standard gallery, but also because she did “not
want to expose the colour's hierarchy in a space. In addition, when light is
draw into a deep, distant space, the space with colour will naturally become
darker. If it is white, it will have the effect of dispersing light in a space.”
(Youtube 2010) SANAA can be said to have achieved the non-hierarchical
space by giving all the space similar spatial treatment with manipulation of
the light, colours and the characteristic of materials.
This type of spaces, containing different facets which share the same
qualities equally, can be very thought-provoking and can be perceived as
non-orientation. None of the space has particularly eye-catching features
that guide the visitors through the building, other than the art work,
activities and the presence of people, owing to the fact that these are
accentuated in this building. For this reason, when one is in the space, one
cannot help but think and respond to the surroundings and what one sees,
and this generates the curiosity and interest to explore and discover. In this
sense, people may realise and relate to the culture of Almere through
observing what is happening in the space.
Page numbers
Fluidity and Flexibility
Another significant feature that always appears in SANAA's architecture is
the fluid and flexible movement through the space. Cortes (Cecilia and
Levene 2007 p.37) concludes that the organisation of criterion in 'De
Kunstlinie' “is simply the division of the plan into a group of rectangles and
squares that are directly attached inside the rectangular perimeter. The
building is a clear example of flexibility in the sense of exchangeable uses,
rather than the usual sense of spatial indefinition.” There is no physically
movable partition in this building to provide the user flexibility in changing
the room size but rather the function of the room changes according to the
user's need. This means that users have the freedom to choose the room to
occupy according to its size and view, rather than a room that was built for
a specific function.
From the plan (Futagawa 2005 p.98 fig.25), one can see that there is no
fixed, rigid indication for the circulation. Surprisingly, there are only a few
short corridors located at the periphery of the building near the lake. The
room's function can sometimes shift to one of circulation, therefore the
corridor space is reduced. Within the design plan, without the help of
corridors in the non-orientation spaces, one has to invent one's own circuit
to move through the space. In other words, the architects have given the
users an alternative to choose the route they prefer, to stroll around the
Page numbers
building at will as in a “public park” (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.289) without
a strong division of public and private space. As noted in SANAA
conceptual drawing, (Cecilia and Levene 2001 p.292 fig.29) all circulation is
connected through multiple rooms on a single floor rather than having a
narrow corridor that links them together. The spaces are interrelated, and
circulating through the building is similar to moving through a series of
rooms. The rooms can be accessed directly or indirectly through the space
around them.
Fig.29 Conceptual drawing, “park” like spaces
The elimination of the corridor not only gives the rooms a closer relationship
with one another, but also relates back to the competition proposal's main
concern of creating an interaction space between professional artists and
Page numbers
practising amateurs. The only programme that is organised above the
ground floor involves the offices and technical rooms for the theatre, to
generate a high level of privacy and to create the appearance of the tower
on the exterior. In this case, the interaction between the office staff and
people on the ground floor is generated through the extension out on the
roof and the void of the internal courtyard space. (Cecilia and Levene 2001
p.297 fig.30)
Fig.30 Roof terrace and void on first floor
In this open plan, where public and private circulation overlap with each
other, the division of space becomes extremely important in order to
maintain the balance of each individual. As each rectangular space can be
used for various activities at particular times, the accessibility of visitors is
restricted at certain points and times. The space divisions can be changed
according to the variations in the specific uses of the building by the
opening of doors (Futagawa 2005 p.98 fig.31). Consequently, the circulation
in the building is liberated yet controllable.
Page numbers
Closed
Fig.31 Variations of circulation path in relation to door
Page numbers
Neutralised Structure and material used
In an essay quoted by Hasegawa (Cecila and Levene 2001 p.337 ), Sejima
says that “getting away from the concept of division, such as structure and
partitions, structure and finishing, I increased the number of rooms as
needed, which eventually led to the whole structure. This method opened
up new flexibility and possibilities”. The concept of using equally divided
grid structures and subdividing the space by partitions was not SANAA's
first concern, rather the architects placing consideration on the organisation
of multiple spatial relations, and carefully allocating a precise division of
space with different wall panels. The supporting structures which are made
up of steel flat bars, are then integrated into 60mm thick partition walls.
Thus, this generates a column free space and only a very few slender round
section steel columns, 60mm in diameter, are applied in the space where
division is not desired. The similar thickness of structure, wall, door, and
window frame means that all components have equal value, all are
homogeneous, none are predominant and this creates the effect of non-
hierarchy in space and elements. The usual role of load-bearing members is
shifted into the walls and the presence of what people perceived as
columns is neutralised.
The only different thickness of walls in the plan is where the three towers are
because of the large span and the sound insulation properties of the walls.
Page numbers
Here again, the role of bearers is transferred not only into the walls, but the
bold grid facade. This deep window frame has overpowered the presence
of columns, and when one views the building interior from the outside, only
empty space is left, and the movement of people. The gap between what
people perceive from the outside and what people experience on the inside
is close.
Fig.32 Wall detail section
are accurately covered with a thin slice of aluminium plate, and the glass
panels is held closely to it, creating a flat, seamless glass surface on the
exterior. The architects examined different materials from glass, synthetic
plastic, plaster board etc. to achieve a different level of transparency,
Page numbers
Although the structure and walls were
reduced to the minimum, SANAA did not
take the approach of excessive reduction in
the detailing. The seamless glass walls, the
restriction of thickness in all the
components, the need to address insulation
and water proofing requirements, and the
equally divided facade must be achieved
with precise detail by the architects. From
the the detailed drawing (Cecilia and
Levene 2007 p.78 fig.32), the eave and sill
translucency and reflectivity on the wall panels. All these materials were
treated as having equal importance and were placed in terms of how
insulation, lighting and acoustics are used for different purposes in a space.
On the exterior, the building was finished with various kinds of solid panels
including concrete panels and structural panels mixed with glass panels.
During the day, parts of the facade reflect the activities of the city; they also
reflect aspects of nature such as water, sky, and urbanity. In the evening
(Kok 2011 fig.33), the interior of the theatre is projected out onto the city,
and the building is turned into a live stage and the internal public “takes
part in this urban scenario of materiality and image.” (Cecilia and Levene
2001 p.288)
Fig.33 View at evening, showing the transparency of the building
Page numbers
Conclusion
In the last century, people have shifted the focal point of their lifestyles from
social to private, meaning that it has been a time dominated by
individualism and materialism, based on the physical senses. However, “the
sense of sight, touch, hearing, smell and taste and various aggregates of
these senses, are set up in the brain of the recipient”, as explained by
Kenya Hara (2007 p.156), who has largely been involved in the field of
sensory perception. In other words, a person's focus should be based on
“consciousness” and not on “body”. For this reason, Hasegawa (Cecilia and
Levene 2001 p.337) states that “the 21st century will be the era of
'consciousness', 'collective intelligence', and 'co-existence'.”
SANAA's architecture has been built to perform in the 21st century. As noted
in the case study, SANAA placed the cultural centre and movie theatre
under one roof, and openly invite the participation of the public from
different backgrounds and ages (co-existence); organise the programme
with the emphasis on the actions and values of people, carefully
considering human interrelationships (consciousness), and with its
“collective intelligence”, SANAA tries to share its ideas through architecture,
creating buildings that not only liberate people from the hierarchy and give
them alternatives, but at the same time, contain the “strength that confuses,
unsettles and suspends the judgement of a viewer while ensuring meaning
Page numbers
is constantly fluid and not fixed to one place.” (Sejima 2010 p.30) In other
words, SANAA's architecture is built to stimulate people's minds but the
effects are ambiguous, as to some degree, this “fluid meaning” is prepared
to absorb the force of the constantly changing society's needs. With this
provocative relationship between people and architecture, or people with
people, SANAA's buildings attempt to draw out the reality of human
behaviour, and have the potential to restore and heal one's awareness and
return it to its original state. Through its architecture, it has shown us that
architecture “can be employed to reinvigorate our sensibility in the physical
world.” (Idenburgh 2010 p.80)
Through exposing the reality, SANAA attempts to create a cultural change
for the present society, however, its architecture should not be followed
blindly on the aesthetic level, but rather, one need to have a deeper
understanding and to learn from its objectives and architectural approach,
which no doubt holds the potential of opening up new discoveries in
architecture and society. As contemporary society is evolving every day,
new questions and problems arise, and the traditional ideologies and ideas
cease to function. Architecture also needs to constantly redefine itself to
target the issues at each particular time. Therefore “we must look beyond
architecture because the new architecture does not proceed from old
Page numbers
architecture but rather directly from the spirit of the period.” (Josep 1998
p.18) SANAA claims that it works only with regard to the concerns of
mankind and problems of the present, without referring to and without
developing any ideology or intervention, critically targeting all the present
issues from economical, cultural, environmental to social, building
regulations and technical problems. Every single aspect is treated as
equally important in every project. Thus, SANAA has subtly produced new
architecture with a spirit that belongs to this time.
What has already been discovered needs to be learned, rethought and
improved in order to seek for and discover even better solutions for the
rapidly changing society. An- architects must become engaged with society,
to design buildings that are for people to use instead of merely being the
architects' self-representation. It is hoped that this will lead to the
rediscovery of architecture's lost potential, so that the relationship between
architecture and society can be reformed.
Page numbers
References
Book
COSTA, X., ed., 2010. SANAA, Kazuyo Sejima, Ryue Nishizawa : Intervention in theMies van der Rohe Pavilion. Barcelona: Mies barcelona.
EVANS, R., 1997. Translations from drawing to building and other essays. London:Janet Evans and Architectural Association Publications.
FEIREISS, K., ed., 2006. SANAA The Zollverein School Essen, Germany. Munich:Prestel.
FUKASAWA, N., and MORRISON, J. 2007. Super normal : sensations of theordinary. Baden: Lars Muller.
HARA, K., 2007. Redesigning design. Baden: Lars Muller.
IDENBURG, F., ed., 2010. The SANAA studios 2006-2008/ Learning from Japan:single story urbanism. Baden: Lars Muller.
KNABE, C. and NOENNIG, J. R., 1999. Shaking the foundations. Japanesearchitects in Dialogue. London: Prestel.
KOOLHAAS, R., 2003. Dutchtown : a city centre design by OMA/Rem Koolhaas.Rotterdam : NAI Publishers.
KUNG, M., ed., 2007. Walter Niedermayr - Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa -SANAA. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
MORRILL, R. and LARNER, M., eds., 2009. SANAA Serpentine Gallery Pavillion2009. London: Koenig Books.
MUSAC, ed., 2007. Houses Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa / SANAA. Leon: ACTAR and MUSAC.
NUTE, K., 2004. Place, time and being in Japanese architecture. London: Routledge.
SCHITTICH, C., 2002. Japan: architecture, constructions, ambiances. Basel:Birkhauser.
SEJIMA, K., ed., 2010. People meet in architecture : Biennale Architettura 2010Exhibition. Venice: Marsilio.
Lecture
PAGE, D. 2010. Page/Park 5710 lecture on 28th October 2010. Aberdeen.
Page numbers
Journal
CASTLE, H., 2001. Editorial. Journal of Architectural Design, 71(4), pp. 5
CECILIA, F. M. and LEVENE, R., eds., 2001. Kazuyo Sejima 1983-2000 + RyueNishizawa 1995-2000: making the boundary. El Croquis, 77(1)+99. pp. 13, 17, 20, 24,25, 26, 288, 289, 291, 337
CECILIA, F. M. and LEVENE, R., eds., 2007. SANAA: Kazuyo Sejima, RyueNishizawa 2004-2008: architectural topology. El Croquis, 139. pp. 19, 21, 22, 33, 37,65, 66, 88, 91 146, 178, 337
FUTAGAWA, Y., ed., 2005. Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa 1987-2006. GAarchitect 18. pp. 99, 116, 150
JOSEP, Q., 1998. Miscellany of others' opinions and own prejudice about the World,the Devil and Architecture. El Croquis, 92. p.18
RATTENBURY, K., 2006. Plenty to bow about. Building Design, 1744, p.18-19
SLESSOR, C., 2007. Walking on water : arts centre, Almere, the Netherlands. TheArchitectural review 222(1328) pp.74-81
Web Page
ARCHINFO, 2011. Kazuyo Sejima – SANAA architects. [online]. Milano: Archinfo.Available from: http://www.archinfo.it/glry/sejima_progetti/01.jpg [Accessed 28January 2011].
BAAN, I. 2011. Theatre “de Kunstlinie” in Almere, the Netherlands by Kazuyo Sejimaand Ryue Nishizawa, SANAA for Domus 908. [online]. Amsterdam: Iwan Baan.Available from:http://www.iwan.com/photo_Almere_theatre_SANAA_de_Kunstlinie.php [Accessed28 January 2011].
DYCKHOFF, T., 2009. Zaha Hadid defies recession with ground-breakingarchitecture. [online]. London: Times Online. Available from:http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/architecture_and_design/article6292851.ece [Accessed 17 January 2011].
ELEMENTPLUSINC, 2010. 2010 SANAA lecture 7/7. [online]. Taiwan:Elementplusinc. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CI7SuK6QP4s&feature=related [Accessed 17 Demcember 2010].
EVANS, C. D., 2007. MIT Sues Frank Gehry Over Design of Celebrity Architect's'Party of Drunken Robots' Building. [online]. US: Fox News. Available from:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,310097,00.html [Accessed 17 January 2011].
GOOGLE, 2011. Almere, The Netherlands. [online]. UK: Google maps. Availablefrom: http://maps.google.com/ [Accessed 28 January 2011].
HADID, Z., 2011. Vitra fire station. [online]. London: Zaha Hadid Architects. Availablefrom: http://www.zaha-hadid.com/built-works/vitra-fire-station [Accessed 28January 2011].
Page numbers
KOK, P., 2011. Centro de cultura 'De Kunstlinie', Almere, Holanda. [online]. Utrecht:Pedro Kok. Available from:http://www.pedrokok.com.br/en/2010/09/centro-de-cultura-de-kunstlinie-almere-holanda/sanaa-kunstlinie-almere-6b/ [Accessed 28January 2011].
LOOS, A. 2010. Excerpts from Ornaments and crime (1908). [online]. Available from:http://www.mariabuszek.com/kcai/Design%20History/Design_readings/LoosOrnamentCrime.pdf [Accessed 17 December2010].
NEW MUSEUM, 2010. SANAA : works 1998-2008. [online]. New York: NewMuseum. Available from: http://www.newmuseum.org/exhibitions/300 [Accessed 17December 2010].
SHINKENCHIKU, 2010. An interview with Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa.[online]. Tokyo: kuu world. Available from: http://www.kuuworld.com/2008/01/an-interview-with-kazuyo-sejima-and-ryue-nishizawa-part-1 !"#$%&'(ー)*+ ,-. / [Accessed 17 December 2010].
STEKELENBURG, E., 2007. The Kunstlinie – SANAA. [online]. Antwerpen: ErikStekelenburg. Available from: http://www.archined.nl/oem/reportages/sanaa-almere/sanaa-almere-eng.html [Accessed 28 January 2011].
TAN, E., 2009. Is Almere there yet? [online]. Rotterdam: Dysturb. Available from: http://www.dysturb.net/2009/is-almere-there-yet/ [Accessed 28 January 2011].
WIKIPEDIA, 2010. Toyo Ito: career. [online]. Wikipedia. Available from:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyo_Ito [Accessed 17 December 2010].
Page numbers
Bibliography
Book
DEMETRIOS, E., 2001. An Eames primer. London: Thames & Hudson.
GRIMA, J. and WONG, K., eds., 2008. SHIFT: SANAA and the new museum. NewYork: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
HARA, K., 2004. Haptic: awakening the senses. Tokyo: Makiko Yabe.
JODIDIO, P., 2006. Architecture in Japan. Cologne: Taschen GmhB.
MELHUISH, C., 2004. Modern house 2. London: Phaidon.
POPLE, N., 2005. Small houses. London: Laurence King.
RUBY, I., 2003. Minimal Architecture. Munuch: Prestel
STRATHAUS, U. J., ed., 2006. Novartis Campus - Fabrikstrasse 4: SANAA / Sejima+ Nishizawa: work by Walter Niedemayr. Basel: Christoph Merian Verlag.
SEJIMA, K., 2001. Kazuyo Sejima in Gifu. Barcelona: Actar.
SEJIMA, K. and NISHIZAWA, R., 2003. Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa / SANAAworks 1995-2003. Tokyo: TOTO Publishing.
Journal
ADAM, H., 2008. New Museum of Contemporary art; Architects: Kazuyo Sejima +Ryue Nishizawa SANAA. Detail, 58(3) p.150
AOKI, J. 2004. Sketch book. Japan Architect, 53 pp.48-55
CAMPBELL, H., 2008. Artist of the floating world: SANAA, Niedermayr and theconstruction of atmosphere. Architectural Design, 78(3) pp.92-95
CASCIANI, S., 2007. Folly and Utopia. Domus, 908 pp.20-27
CURTIS, JR. W., 2010. Less is more? Less is less? Masters of simplicity SANAA winthe Pritzker Prize. Architectural Review, 228(1360) pp.31-32
DANNATT, A., 2007. Shock of the new. Building Design, 1799 pp.12-15
GRIMA, J., 2006. Glass Pavilion, Toledo. Domus, 897 pp.18-31
GRIMA, J., 2006. Zollverein School. Domus, 895 pp.76-85
GRIMA, J. and OTA, K., 2004. 21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art. Domus,876 pp.18-45
KELLY, P., 2006. Zollverein School, Essen. Blueprint, 247 pp.92-98
HO, C. L., 2008. New Museum, New York; Architects: Kazuyo Sejima & RyueNishizawa SANAA. Blueprint, 262 pp.34-37
IDENBURG, F., 2008. Essay: SANAA's foreign mission. Architecture and Urbanism,449(2) pp.122-127
IDENBURG, F. and OKI, T., 2007. Beautiful rough. Domus, 909 pp.12-21
IGARASHI, T., 2006. Crystal-clear public space. Domus, 895 pp.88-95
KAIJIMA, M., 2007. House in a Plum Grove, Tokyo. Werk Bauen & Wohnen, 94(61)pp.18-23
Page numbers
MERKEL, J., 2008. Interior eye. SANAA's New Museum of Contemporary Art, NewYork; Architects: Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa SANAA. Architectural Design,78(3) pp.98-101
MESLAY, O., 2008. The Lourvre-Lens (Kazuyo Sejima + Ryue Nishizawa SANAAwith Imrey Culbert and Catherine Mosbach). Architecture and Urbanism, 451(4)pp.114-119
MORENO, C. D. and GRINDA, E. G., 2004. Ocean of air. El Croquis 121/122, pp.27-39
OCKMAN, J., 2008. New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York. Casebella,72(763) pp.70-82
PEARSON, C. A., 2008. New Museum, New York. Architectural Record, 196(3)pp.132-139
PEARSON, C. A., 2007. SANAA's Sejima and Nishizawa create layers of reflectionsand perspectives in their glass Pavilion at the Toledo Museum of Art. ArchitecturalRecord, 195(1) pp.78-83
SANAA, 2007. 'De Kunstlinie' Theatre and Cultural Center, Almere. GA Document, 98pp.46-49
SANAA, 2007. New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York. GA Document, 100pp.92-107
WEBB, M., 2008. New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York; Architects: KazuyoSejima + Ryue Nishizawa SANAA. Architectural Review, 223(1334), pp.52-59
WOODMAN, E., 2006. Industrial evolution. Building Design, 1735 pp.8-11
Internet Resources
ARTIT, 2010. Societies, landscapes, building in time. ART it. Available from:http://www.art-it.asia/u/admin_ed_feature_e/vY0PpsjM8HmeNIWflwnd [Accessed28 January 2011].
IDENBURG, F., 2011. New sobriety. [online]. New York: SO-IL. Available from:http://so-il.org/artifact/195 [Accessed 28 January 2011].
MERRICK, J., 2010. Learning curve: SANAA's spectacular floating Laussanne libraryrockets them into architecture's premier league. UK: The Independent. Availablefrom: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/architecture/learning-curve-sanaas-spectacular-floating-lausanne-library-rockets-them-into-architectures-premier-league-1902816.html [Accessed 28 January 2011].
NEWEL, C., 2011. 68. taking a lesson from SANAA. [online]. Notes on becoming afamous architect. Available from:http://famousarchitect.blogspot.com/2010/04/sanaa.html [Accessed 17 January2011].
NHIT-SHIS, 2010. Theatre and Arts Centre De Kunstlinie in Almere by SANAAArchitect. [online]. Home and House Design. Available from: http://www.nhit-shis.org/theatre-and-arts-centre-de-kunstlinie-in-almere-by-sanaa-architect/[Accessed 15 November 2010].
Page numbers