Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

download Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

of 15

Transcript of Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    1/15

    Customer Scenario and Customers.com are registered trademarks and Customer Flight Deck and Quality of Customer Experience (QCE) are service marks of the

    Patricia Seybold Group Inc. P.O. Box 783, Needham, MA 02494 USA www.customers.com Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    Patricia Seybold Group / Evaluation Framework

    Recommendation Evaluation Framework, Version 2Evaluating Solutions for Personalization and Recommendations

    By Susan E. Aldrich, Sr. VP and Sr. Consultant, Patricia Seybold Group September 22, 2011

    NETTING IT OUT

    Recommendations are hitting their stride. A decade ago merchants and publishers saw therecommendations on Amazons site and wantedit. A decade ago they had to spend afortune to get it. Today, recommendation engines can be had for some thousands of dollarsa month and can be implemented in a few weeks. My guess is that recommendations will

    be ubiquitous within the next two to three years. Im always optimistic on these guesses, butsince recommendations are widely available as a service, rollout can be very swift.

    SaaS offerings greatly simplify the technology aspect of implementation and virtuallyeliminate up-front costs, making it relatively easy for customers to sign up with a vendor.Nevertheless, choosing a vendor wisely is always better than choosing often. To aid in thatchoice, I offer a set of requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in this evaluationframework. This framework updates and replaces the recommendation evaluationframework published in January, 2010. I will be using the framework to evaluate a numberof the leading products using the framework during 2011-12, leading to a detailedcomparison.

    WHATS INTERESTING ABOUT RECOMMENDATIONS

    What Are Targeting and Personalization

    Targeted marketing selects content (including products and offers) for consumers based on traits

    such as consumer context or behavior. The consumer is likely anonymous. Personalization requires a

    consumer profile that includes traits such as demographics, purchase history, and behavior, and this

    profile is used by the algorithms that select the content to be presented. While registering and log-

    ging in increases the customer profile data, the consumer is most often identified by web browser

    cookies and an associated identification number. Without registration, it is likely the profile does not

    contain user information such as name and address, so consumer anonymity is retained.

    What Is Recommendation Technology

    Web site owners worldwide have yearned for recommendations ever since Amazon started tell-

    ing us that people who bought this also bought that and today tell us 52 percent of people who

    looked at this bought that; 26 percent bought this other thing. A decade ago marketers had to spend

    a great deal to implement recommendations on their sites. Today, recommendation engines can be

    had for some hundreds of dollars a month and can be implemented in a few days. Dont you just love

    SaaS?

    Direct link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1571/fw09-22-11cc

    http://www.customers.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.1571/fw09-22-11cchttp://dx.doi.org/10.1571/fw09-22-11cchttp://www.customers.com/http://dx.doi.org/10.1571/fw09-22-11cc
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    2/15

    2 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    For the user, recommendations on a site can mean pretty darn good search results, much of the

    time; emails with interesting offers; banner ads that catch your eye; useful guidance when you are se-

    lecting content, whether its a digital camera, a news article, a problem resolution, or a research

    document; clicks that take you from Google right to the content you need.

    For the content ownerwhether merchant selling products, publisher presenting articles, or

    marketer presenting offersrecommendation technology means delivering the most attractive itemin those few seconds before you lose your audiences attention.

    A recommendation engine can double or quadruple the click-through rate as compared with the

    recommendations selected by the expertsthe merchandisers or researchers or support specialists. It

    typically has significant impact on revenue, time on site, employee productivity, and customer satis-

    faction.

    Where Are Recommendations Used

    Because recommendations had their most visible debut in ecommerce, people tend to associate

    recommendations with shopping. In the ecommerce arena, recommendations are used most often on

    product pages, shopping cart pages, category pages, and order confirmation pages. Recommenda-

    tions are also used to tailor the content of those emails that entice you to stop work for a moment andshop. As a marketing team becomes more familiar and more confident with using recommendations,

    they expand recommendations to cover more of the interactions across the customer lifecycle.

    But I think product recommendations are the tip of the iceberg for recommendations. They be-

    long everywhere content must be winnowed for a user, or everywhere that personalization improves

    a users productivity or experience. For example:

    A news site that knows I love football and dont care about rugby, and always shows methe most interesting world news

    A personalized view of the corporate intranet that highlights my department, my division,and my projects

    My view of corporate research knowledge bases, weighted to what Im working on

    Web sites that deliver coaching, e.g., for runners, dieters, investors, tailored to the mystyle and goals

    My personalized support portal to the corporate help desk

    My companys portal to a key supplier, e.g., Cisco, personalized by role or person

    My dashboard with my KPIs and corporate reports, with the hottest items on the firstpage

    A personalized investment site, e.g., Fidelity, tailored to the kind of investor I am

    A personalized commerce site tailored to my relationship, e.g., the car I drive, the sports Iplay

    Billing inquiry that always shows the disputed bills first

    Order history inquiry that always shows the most referenced order first

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    3/15

    Evaluation Framework for Personalization/Recommendations Solutions 3

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    My guess is that recommendations will be ubiquitous within the next two to three years. Im al-

    ways optimistic on these guesses, but since recommendations are widely available as a service, roll-

    out can be very swift.

    The technology effort, and the up-front costs, for deploying recommendations are relatively

    small, which makes it reasonably easy for customers to sign up for a recommendation service. The

    greatest effort for recommendation customers seems to be in learning how to use them, where to usethem, and how to use them effectivelyskills which will be portable to any vendors solution. Nev-

    ertheless, choosing a vendor wisely is always better than choosing often. To aid in that choice, I have

    compiled a set of requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in this evaluation framework. And I

    will be evaluating a number of the leading products using the framework during 2011 and 2012,

    leading to a detailed comparison.

    REQUIREMENTS

    The requirements for recommendation services are derived from customer requirements. Cus-

    tomers for recommendation services cover several roles, including the end-consumers of recom-

    mendations, the business people managing recommendations, and technical staff. Their requirements

    generate the evaluation criteria which are listed in the Table.

    Recommendation Consumer Requirements

    People consuming recommendationsthe visitors, shoppers, readers, researchers to whom con-

    tent is being recommendedof course, need relevant and enticing recommendations, thats the

    whole point. But they also need privacy and may wish they had some control over what personal in-

    formation is used and how it is used. As recommendations are increasingly used to personalize ex-

    periences, consumers may also want a mechanism to indicate the persona they represent. Dont

    recommend for me, recommend for my [boss, niece, colleague].

    Recommendation Manager Requirements

    The marketers, merchandisers, editors, business analysts and other business people who are us-

    ing recommendations as a tool to improve user experience have a broad range of requirements, start-

    ing from the initial deployment.

    The business people who are responsible for recommendations need help making great ones, in-

    cluding:

    Guidance on how to deploy recommendations effectively

    Advice on how to increase recommendation effectiveness

    Training and tools to track and analyze recommendation effectiveness

    Business people need tools to deploy, test, analyze, and optimize recommendations:

    GUI or wizards for specifying rules for how recommendations are selected and presented

    Consistent interfaces designed for their business processes, not for the structure of therecommendation product

    Granularity in controlling the content selection process, e.g., using customer history toselect sports content but crowd wisdom in selecting fashion

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    4/15

    4 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    Aggregation in controlling the content selection process, e.g., global rules that apply tomultiple sites, countries, and pages

    Automation of deployment, analysis, and optimization

    Testing and reporting that will compare different recommendation deployments

    Integration with other marketing tools

    Business people need to manage the recommendation service, and therefore need capabilities

    that include:

    Reporting on recommendation results, e.g., click through, conversion, revenue

    Reporting on recommendation engine service level, e.g., response time and availability ofservice

    Security of their content and user information; privacy of consumer information

    Reliable, high performance

    Controlled, role-based access to recommendation management functionality

    IT Requirements

    IT personnel are potentially involved in deploying and managing recommendation technology,

    either on premise or as part of the SaaS implementation. They need:

    APIs or Web Services for requesting recommendations from other applications

    Ease of adding and testing recommendation data gathering to Web pages

    Ease of providing a content data feed to recommendation service provider or enabling acrawl

    Ease of creating a zone on Web pages, emails, phones, or other venues, where therecommendations will be displayed

    Capability to incorporate management of the recommendation engine or service intoenterprise management

    Security for data provided to the recommendation service provider

    Integration of recommendation inputs and outputs with other segmentation, behavioralanalytics, Web statistics, and data modeling applications

    Importance, Visibility, and Differentiation

    As I prepare my requirements and evaluation criteria, I confess to taking certain shortcuts. If all

    products offer a capability, I will drop it from my criteria regardless of its importance in order to

    simplify the evaluation process. For example, it is unarguably critical that you be able to start and

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    5/15

    Evaluation Framework for Personalization/Recommendations Solutions 5

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    stop the recommendation service. All products offer this capability, so its not a feature cluttering up

    my evaluation matrix.

    More problematical are the capabilities that are very important but cant be observed or meas-

    ured. At the very top of this list is, for a specific web site, do Vendor As algorithms deliver better

    recommendations than Vendor Bs? Algorithm quality will be very important to the recommendation

    manager, but perhaps not in the first months or even years of deployment, when she is developingher recommendation expertise. During that time, vendor expertise and guidance are far more critical.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    6/15

    6 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Recommendation Platform Requirements

    Category Recommendation Platform Evaluation Criteria

    Solution Positioning What solutions are offered by the vendor?

    o If the vendor has multiple product l ines, list the major categories of products.

    o Briefly describe the solutions offered in the personalization, recommendations,

    and targeted marketing arena. Include the unique value proposition for each

    solution.

    Guidance and Advice What are the vendors target markets, by industry and company size?

    o What is the vendors distribution of clients across industries: retail, B2B

    ecommerce, media, travel, online services? See Table B.

    o What is the vendors distribution of clients across retail categories: apparel +

    accessories, books/film/music, computers/electronics, flowers/gifts/jewelry,

    food/drug, hardware/home improvement, housewares/home furnishings, mass

    merchants/wholesale clubs/department stores, specialty/non-apparel, sporting

    goods? See Table B.

    o What geographies are supported? What languages do the vendors customers

    work in? In what languages are they deploying recommendations? What is the

    distribution of the vendors clients, by continent: North America, South America,

    Europe, Asia, Africa? See Table C.

    o What percentage of clients are multi-site? Multi-country? Multi-currency?

    o Does the vendor leverage its client base by offering collaborative or syndicated

    recommendations? Syndicated recommendations include product catalogs of

    other merchants in a set of recommendations; collaborative recommendationsrecommend products at other retailers that match the customers interest, based

    on cross-matching activities on both sites.

    How successful are this vendors clients?

    o For ecommerce clients, what percent of lift (e.g., revenue increase for

    ecommerce sites, ad impressions for media sites) is provided by direct action on

    recommendations (shopper clicks on a recommendation and immediately buys

    the item), and what percent by delayed action on recommendations (shopper

    buys an item previously recommended)?

    o What is the average annual growth rate in number of recommendations

    consumed per client?

    o What is the retention rate of clients?

    o What is the average number of recommendations touchpoints deployed per

    client?

    o What is the distribution of usage of key solution capabilities per client: e.g., web

    recommendations, email recommendations, mobile recommendations, ads,

    APIs? See Table D.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    7/15

    Evaluation Framework for Personalization/Recommendations Solutions 7

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Recommendation Platform Requirements (continued)

    Category Recommendation Platform Evaluation Criteria

    Guidance and Advice

    (continued)

    What types of coaching and training are provided and at what points in the

    relationship? E.g., Implementation Classes for IT, 1:1 coaching for merchandisers

    new to recommendations, self-training for advanced merchandisers, user

    conferences, videos, blogs. What services are provided on site?

    What type of account management and relationship management services are

    provided (business guidance, best practices, integration support)? What is the

    frequency of business, planning or strategy review? What is the experience level of

    the people performing the reviews?

    Recommendation

    Structure

    What are the sources of content that can be presented in recommendations? For

    example, catalog/databases, content management repositories, CRM systems.

    What types of recommendations are supported? For example, people who

    bought/viewed this bought that; most popular; your-friends-liked; a dynamic

    bundle with a dynamic price; questions that collect and analyze answers; search

    results, etc. See Table E.

    If algorithms can be customized, what factors can be included, and who performs

    the customization?

    If behavioral recommendations are supported, what behaviors are observed and

    used? E.g., incoming site, search terms, views, time spent viewing, navigation

    selections, cart adds, cart abandons. What behavior-based recommendation types

    are provided?

    Personalization: If customer profiles are supported, what data is collected? How are

    customers recognized across sessions and touchpoints? What customer profile-based recommendations are provided?

    How does the solution use social media? For Facebook and for LinkedIn, what data

    is used, and what algorithms (strategies) are enabled? For ratings and reviews,

    what data is used, from what sources, for what algorithms?

    Describe the scientific principles, algorithms and data models used for each

    recommendation pattern. What associations do the vendors algorithms support?

    E.g., item-item; item(s)-item(s), person-item, person-person, other.

    What recommendation types are supported for each touchpoint: web, email, kiosk,

    mobile, business application, iOs app? When are the recommendations generated

    for each touchpoint: batch, at send time (for email), at open time? See Table E.

    Can the recommendation systems insights/analysis be used by other systems,

    such as search, customer segmentation, data warehouse? Describe.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    8/15

    8 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    Recommendation Platform Requirements (continued)

    Category Recommendation Platform Evaluation Criteria

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Managing

    Recommendations

    Testing

    Describe the approach to testing recommendations: Is it A/B or multivariate; what is

    the limit for simultaneous recommendation tests?

    How does the solution measure success of the recommendations? Can it measure

    based on client-specified KPIs?

    In what ways can the solution automatically optimize recommendation approaches

    to reach client-specified business goals?

    Interface for managing recommendations:

    Describe the interface. How is it organized? What is the set of symbols, tabs, and

    other interface elements that is consistent (in appearance and meaning) from task

    to task? Does it include a preview of changes being made, and provide a workflowfor managing review and approval of changes? Is access controlled based on

    roles? What controls are in place that enable groups of people to manage

    recommendations without getting in each others way?

    What tasks can be handled by business people via the interface without calling on

    technical staff for help? Or which tasks require technical (IT) staff?

    Describe the principles by which business people can control recommendations.

    For example, do they create (or use) templates, what does the template control.

    How can rules or filters be applied, and to what objects (e.g., pages, templates,

    segments, time periods)? What data can be specified in rules and filters, e.g.,

    inventory, margin, segment, advertiser, combinations of factors?

    What support is provided for managing multi-site, multi-country, and multi-currency

    clients? For example, global and local rules; copy and edit templates; copy and edit

    configuration.

    Reporting:

    Does reporting and analysis provide suggestions on how to improve

    recommendations to achieve KPIs? Does the vendors staff?

    How does the reporting include targets, make forecasts, provide alerts, and analyze

    contribution to KPIs?

    What is the most recent period that can be viewed in reports? I.e., how near real

    time? What is the mechanism for scheduling automatic report creation and distribution?

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    9/15

    Evaluation Framework for Personalization/Recommendations Solutions 9

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    Recommendation Platform Requirements (continued)

    Category Recommendation Platform Evaluation Criteria

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Integration and

    Ecosystem

    How does the solution fit into the marketing ecosystem? What information is made

    available to other marketing tools? What information from other marketing tools is

    used by the recommendation solution? How would recommendations contribute to

    a marketing campaign? How would recommendations that are part of campaign be

    monitored and managed? How would the results of a campaign be reflected in

    recommendations?

    How does the recommendation solution fit into the web site ecosystem, e.g., site

    search, content management, SEO, SEM, advertising, and other applications?

    Describe what data is required by the recommendation engine, and how it is

    collected, including the format of feeds, language of collectors, and testing process.

    Does the solution have auto-discovery capability for content and items?

    Describe the mechanisms for ensuring data privacy and security, for customer anduser data.

    Describe APIs provided. What languages/methods are provided? What services are

    available via API?

    Describe partner programs. What support is provided partners who seek to provide

    more services to clients? What is the metric for partner value to the ecosystem?

    Describe the typical implementation cycle, including activities, milestones,

    timeframes, and project management tools. What role/skill typically manages the

    project (for vendor and for client)?

    Operations For on-premise software managed by the customer: What is the mechanism for availability and scalability? If multiple machines are

    involved, what is the mechanism for managing multiple machines, both day-to-day

    and during software upgrades?

    Are SNMP alerts provided for integration with enterprise management?

    What are the scalability limits, in terms of content and users?

    For Hosted Software as a Service (SaaS):

    Describe your SLA, including guarantees, penalties, and limits; include a summary

    of SLA performance for past 12 months.

    What is the typical response time for the recommendation service? How many recommendations were served in the past three months? Please define

    what you mean by recommendation: is it a query, or the number of items returned,

    or something else?

    How many data centers support the recommendation engine? Where are they

    located?

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    10/15

    10 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    Recommendation Platform Requirements (continued)

    Category Recommendation Platform Evaluation Criteria

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Table A. The evaluation criteria for recommendation engines or platforms are based on customer requirements.We will use the criteria to analyze leading recommendation solutions.

    Vendors Development

    and Maintenance

    Do you package named releases? If so, describe your release frequency for new

    functionality and for bug fixes.

    What methodology or standards are followed in support, bug correction, and

    testing?

    Describe the escalation path for performance or quality issues.

    Company and Product

    Viability

    Product background and release history: month/year of major releases, beginning

    with the initial release

    Product plans: frequency of major/minor releases; enhancements planned for the

    next three months

    Partner and OEM strategy for recommendation solution

    Number of clients and sites

    Pricing for recommendation solutions:

    o What is the basis for pricing? If recommendation success is a factor, please

    describe how recommendation success is defined.

    o What is the average low end and high end?

    Company history: date founded, founders, investors, # employees

    Financial performance as available

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    11/15

    Evaluation Framework for Personalization/Recommendations Solutions 11

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Table B. Each vendor targets specific industries with its marketing, sales, technology, and customer care.

    Industry Focus

    Industry Sub category Percent ofclients

    Total for all retail

    Apparel and accessories

    Books/film/music

    Computers/electronics

    Flowers/gifts/jewelry

    Hardware/home improvement

    Housewares/home furnishings

    Mass merchants/wholesale clubs/department stores

    Specialty/non-apparel

    Sporting goods

    Retail

    Other

    B2B

    Media

    Travel

    Telecom

    Online Services

    Advertising

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    12/15

    12 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    Geographic Focus

    Percent of

    Clients

    List of Clients Countries Languages Supported for Console

    North

    America

    South

    America

    Europe

    Asia + Pacific

    Africa

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Table C. Each solution is deployed on multiple continents and on Web sites in many languages. The consoleprovides the interfaces that marketers and merchandisers use to manage and optimize recommendations.

    Use of Services

    Services provided by this vendor (add or remove services as

    appropriate)

    Percent of clients using the service

    Web recommendations

    Email recommendations

    Mobile recommendations

    Kiosk recommendations

    Display Ads

    APIs

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Table D. Successful clients expand their use of vendors services. This table reflects the level of adoption of keyservices.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    13/15

    Recommendation Evaluation Framework, Version 2 13

    Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law. Customers.com Research Service

    For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected] 2011 Patricia Seybold Group

    Recommendation Types and Structures

    Recommendation Structures Supported

    Item-item(s) associations X

    Many items to item(s)

    Person-person associations

    Item(s)-Person(s) associations

    Recommendation Types (list here)

    Behavior-based

    Profile-based

    Social-Media

    Web Email Mobile Kiosk Business

    Appl.

    Generated as batch; at send; or at open

    Rules driven (e.g., top

    sellers, lists such as

    staff picks)

    X Open Send Batch Open

    Rules modified (e.g.,

    white and black list)

    X

    People who viewed

    this, viewed that

    People like you whoviewed this, viewed

    that

    People who viewed

    this, bought that

    People like you who

    viewed this, bought

    that

    People who bought

    this, bought that

    People like you who

    bought this, bought

    that

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    14/15

    14 Evaluation Framework

    Customers.com Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group For Reprints/Redistribution rights, contact: [email protected]

    Recommendation Types and Structures (continued)

    Recommendation Types (list here)

    Behavior-

    based

    Profile-

    based

    Social-

    Media

    Web Email Mobile Kiosk Business

    Appl.

    Generated as batch; at send; or at open

    Search results

    selected and ranked

    Landing page items

    selected and ranked

    ..etc

    Syndicatedrecommendations

    Collaborative

    recommendations

    2011 Patricia Seybold Group Inc.

    Table E. Each solution supports a variety of recommendation types. This is due in part to the recommendationstructures that are supported. Each recommendation type may be available to multiple touchpoints. Sometouchpoints allow for the most dynamic recommendations, that is, recommendations that are selected at themoment the page is accessed (such as opening an email). Other touchpoints call for the least dynamicrecommendations, produced in a batch. A kiosk in offline mode would require batch recommendations.

    CONCLUSION

    This evaluation framework will be applied to the leading recommendation solutions during the

    coming months. After we have evaluated a number of products, we will compare the leaders and

    analyze which solutions best suit which applications and markets. You are welcome to use our

    framework for your own evaluation. We welcome your comments.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Recommendation Eval Framework V2!09!22 2011

    15/15

    About Susan E. Aldrich and Patricia Seybold Group

    Customers.com

    Research Service Unauthorized redistribution of this report is a violation of copyright law.

    2011 P t i i S b ld G F R i t /R di t ib ti i ht t t l @ t

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    SUSAN E. ALDRICH is a Senior Vice President and Senior Consultant at thePatricia Seybold Group.

    Aldrich is a senior analyst for the firms Advisory Service. As leading authorityon worldwide technologies, custom er requirements, practices, and

    governance for finda bility, she manages the Sear ch, Navigation, and

    Discovery Research Practice. Her research foc uses on customer self-service,information management an d technologies and practi ces for mo nitoring,

    measuring, and managing the Quality of Customer ExperienceSM (QCE).

    Aldrichs experience includes commercial a pplications development, deployment, and

    implementation and operating systems deve lopment. She has provided informationmanagement, customer relationship, and distributed systems management consulting

    worldwide.

    Patricia Seybold GroupTrusted Advisors to Customer-Centric Executives

    If you're a visionary customer-focused executive, thePatricia Seybold Group should be your firstchoice for ongoing strategic advice, business and technology guidance, customer experience best

    practices, and help with customer-centric initiatives.

    Founded in 1978 a nd based in Boston, we provide consulting, research and advisory services,

    peer groups, and in teractive workshops. We h elp clients to design an d continuously improve

    their customer-focused business strategies and processes using our pro ven consultingmethodology,Customer Scenario Design.

    The CEO and founder, Patricia Seybold, is t he New York Times best-selling author of

    Customers.com and The Customer Revolution. Patty's latest book, Outside Innovation, isavailable now.

    Patricia Seybold Group

    P.O. Box 783Needham, MA 02494

    Phone: (617) 742-5200

    Fax: (617) 742-1028

    Email: [email protected]: http://www.customers.com

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.customers.com/http://www.customers.com/http://www.customers.com/http://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/books_oi.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/books_oi.aspxmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.customers.com/http://www.customers.com/http://www.psgroup.com/signup.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/books_oi.aspxhttp://www.psgroup.com/consulting_csmcert.aspxhttp://www.customers.com/mailto:[email protected]://www.customers.com/mailto:[email protected]