Recommendation and the Library

49
Recommendations and the Library Nettie Lagace Product Manager, Ex Libris

description

Services recommending books = BibTip, LibraryThing, University of Huddersfield borrowing recommendations, and articles – bX from Ex Libris, PubMed, Synthese (CISTI) now exist in the academic context. JISC in the UK is sponsoring a major project, MOSAIC: “Making Our Shared Activity Information Count.” This session will provide an overview of these recommendation systems, describe their different approaches to data mining, and discuss their role in improving information retrieval and user experience in a now nearly fully online scholarly information world.

Transcript of Recommendation and the Library

Page 1: Recommendation and the Library

Recommendations and the Library

Nettie Lagace

Product Manager, Ex Libris

Page 2: Recommendation and the Library

Copyright Statement

All of the information and material inclusive of text, images, logos, product names is either the

property of, or used with permission by Ex Libris Ltd. The information may not be distributed,

modified, displayed, reproduced – in whole or in part – without the prior written permission of

Ex Libris Ltd.

TRADEMARKS

Ex Libris, the Ex Libris logo, Aleph, SFX, SFXIT, MetaLib, DigiTool, Verde, Primo, Voyager,

MetaSearch, MetaIndex, bX and other Ex Libris products and services referenced herein are

trademarks of Ex Libris, and may be registered in certain jurisdictions. All other product names,

company names, marks and logos referenced may be trademarks of their respective owners.

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this document is compiled from various sources and provided on an

"AS IS" basis for general information purposes only without any representations, conditions or

warranties whether express or implied, including any implied warranties of satisfactory quality,

completeness, accuracy or fitness for a particular purpose.

Ex Libris, its subsidiaries and related corporations ("Ex Libris Group") disclaim any and all liability

for all use of this information, including losses, damages, claims or expenses any person may

incur as a result of the use of this information, even if advised of the possibility of such loss or

damage.

© Ex Libris Ltd., 2009

Page 3: Recommendation and the Library

Agenda

• What will the future be like?

• Recommender systems in general

• “In the Wild”

• New scholarly environments

• Article recommenders

• Interfaces

• Contributions

Page 4: Recommendation and the Library

http://www.idealog.com/stay-ahead-of-the-shift-what-publishers-can-do-to-flourish-in-a-community-centric-web-world

Page 5: Recommendation and the Library

Recommender Systems

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recommendation_systems

Recommender systems form a specific type of information filtering (IF) technique that attempts to present information items (movies, music, books, news, images, web pages, etc.) that are likely of interest to the user.

Page 6: Recommendation and the Library
Page 7: Recommendation and the Library
Page 8: Recommendation and the Library
Page 9: Recommendation and the Library
Page 10: Recommendation and the Library
Page 11: Recommendation and the Library
Page 12: Recommendation and the Library
Page 13: Recommendation and the Library
Page 14: Recommendation and the Library
Page 15: Recommendation and the Library
Page 16: Recommendation and the Library

Library Book Recommendations

Page 17: Recommendation and the Library
Page 18: Recommendation and the Library

http://library.hud.ac.uk/data/usagedata/

Page 19: Recommendation and the Library

• Greater focus on content users create and choices & preferences they make

• User contribution increasingly important

• Contributed explicitly by individuals

• The Web is multi-directional

Changes in Scholarly Communication

Page 20: Recommendation and the Library

• Greater focus on content users create and choices & preferences they make

• User contribution increasingly important

• Contributed explicitly by individuals

• The Web is multi-directional

• Implicitly - usage data captured by the system (‘clickstreams’)

Changes in Scholarly Communication

Page 21: Recommendation and the Library

There is a need

• Information overload calls for new tools that assist users in finding relevant information

• Useful in the context of:

• learning

• exploring new fields of interest

• inter-disciplinary work

• specific information needs that are outside one’s field of expertise

• Search is NOT the only way to find…

Page 22: Recommendation and the Library

Scholarly Recommender Service

Need to:

• Focus on scholarly materials – particularly

articles (core unit of use)

• Be based on structural analysis of usage and

not just based on popularity

Page 23: Recommendation and the Library
Page 24: Recommendation and the Library
Page 25: Recommendation and the Library

CiteULike Recommendations

/embedded video removed from PPT – see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ium2fS1LW5w

Page 26: Recommendation and the Library
Page 27: Recommendation and the Library

What is bX?

• A service which taps into the power of the networked scholarly community to generate recommendations based on article usage

• Based on data mining and structural analysis of aggregated usage data, across libraries and scholarly information environments

• Massive repository of user data -growing

• Derives from research done at Los Alamos National Laboratory by Johan Bollen and Herbert Van de Sompel

Page 28: Recommendation and the Library

Interest in usage-based measures

• COUNTER – www.projectcounter.org

• SUSHI - www.niso.org/workrooms/sushi

• JISC MOSAIC – www.sero.co.uk/jisc-mosaic.html

• Metrics for scholarly evaluation:

• UKSG Usage Factors project

- uksg.org/usagefactors

• Project MESUR - www.mesur.org

Page 29: Recommendation and the Library

Implicit user contribution

• Circulation data

• Clickstreams, recording a search process

• Actions

• Item viewed

• Item downloaded

• Item sent

• Item bookmarked

• Item printed

• Item stored

Page 30: Recommendation and the Library
Page 31: Recommendation and the Library

Potential uses of implicit contribution

• Collection development

• Evaluation

• Trend analysis

• Relevance ranking

• Recommendations

Page 32: Recommendation and the Library

bX Demo

Page 33: Recommendation and the Library

bX Demo

Page 34: Recommendation and the Library

bX Demo

Page 35: Recommendation and the Library

bX Demo

Page 36: Recommendation and the Library

bX Demo

Page 37: Recommendation and the Library

Link resolver usage logs

• A good basis:

• Represent users’ information-seeking paths in a standardized way

• Are across information providers

• Are across institutions

• There are a lot of them

Page 38: Recommendation and the Library

Citation databases

Link Resolver

GoogleScholar

E-journal publisher

site

E-journal publisher

site

A&I databases

Library interface

E-Book publisher

site

Document Delivery

OpenURL OpenURL

OpenURL

OpenURL

Link resolver usage paths

Page 39: Recommendation and the Library

Built on OpenURL

• Usage data –OpenURL context objects-- is harvested from link resolver logs through OAI-PMH

• Build a (very large) aggregate of usage data

• Mine the aggregate to derive scholarly recommender services: a structure describing relationships between scholarly materials is created

• bX receives OpenURL requests

• A list of recommended materials is generated per request

• open interface - accessible via API

• viewable via SFX menu, other discovery interfaces

Page 40: Recommendation and the Library

Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Bettencourt L, Chute R, et al. (2009) Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803

Page 41: Recommendation and the Library

bX Research

http://pu

blic.lanl.g

ov/herbe

rtv/

papers/jc

dl06_acce

pted_versi

on.pdf

Page 42: Recommendation and the Library

More about the interaction with bX

• Request to bX is sent through an API

• Results are returned as

• XML (default)

• Text

• ATOM

• RSS

Page 43: Recommendation and the Library

Recommendations in Primo V3

Page 44: Recommendation and the Library
Page 45: Recommendation and the Library
Page 46: Recommendation and the Library

Benefits of bX Contribution

• Ongoing analysis of SFX usage data created by library users

• Continual improvement of recommendations

• Cooperation with other research library sites – on a grand scale

Page 47: Recommendation and the Library

What do people say?“JSTOR meets Amazon!?”

- ELUNA twitterer

“On May 5, Ex Libris rolled out the shiny new fabulousness that is bX. … (turns) the Services Menu into a point-of-need discovery tool. I think this is awesome. ”

- Jamene Brooks-Kieffer, Kansas State Univ.

“I found exactly what I wanted. I've already found even more relevant articles in 10 minutes than I've found in the last 10 months using more traditional methods of research.”

- Ph.D. student, Arizona State University

“I’m always trying to find new connections between biological systems. This looks like a really useful tool for this discovery. I’m interested in seeing others’ connections. An unknown system can link to one which is well-studied.”

- Laboratory director, University of Ottawa Heart Institute

“One thing I've noticed and got a few comments about is that the increase in amount of recommendations has been noticeable from last summer to now. Now it's much easier (to find recommendations). The recommendations seem … relevant”

- Systems librarian, FinELib

Page 48: Recommendation and the Library

“The Web, they say, is leaving the era of search and entering one of discovery. What's the difference? Search is what you do when you're looking for something. Discovery is when something wonderful that you didn't know existed, or didn't know how to ask for, finds you.“

Jeffrey M. O’Brien, "The race to create a 'smart' Google“http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2006/11/27/8394347/

Page 49: Recommendation and the Library

Thank you!

[email protected]