Recent Enhancements for Composite Design Optimization
-
date post
12-Sep-2014 -
Category
Technology
-
view
1.285 -
download
6
description
Transcript of Recent Enhancements for Composite Design Optimization
Recent Enhancements for
Composite Design Optimization
Ming Zhou, Raphael Fleury
Altair Engineering, Irvine, California
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Agenda
1. Brief Overview of Composite Optimization Process
2. Ply Drop-off Constraints and Other Enhancements
3. Application Examples
3. Conclusion
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite Optimization Process
Automation
Patch Interpretation
Tailoring?
Free Sizing!
Phase 1
Number of Plies?
Ply Bundle Sizing!
Phase 2
Laminate Stacking?
Optimized Stacking
Sequence!
Phase 3
Rule based
ply shuffling
45 -45 0 0 0
45 -45 45 90
90 -45 45 -45 0 0
-45 90 45
(a) Ply Level (b) Superply Level
45 -45 0 0 0
45 -45 45 90
90 -45 45 -45 0 0
-45 90 45
(a) Ply Level (b) Superply Level
Discrete Ply Thickness
Automation
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite Box Beam
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite Optimization Process
Phase III - Detail: Stacking Sequence Optimization
• Meet ply book rules
• All behavior constraints
• Stacking manufacturing constraints
45 -45 0 0 0
45 -45 45 90
90 -45 45 -45 0 0
-45 90 45
(a) Ply Level (b) Superply Level
45 -45 0 0 0
45 -45 45 90
90 -45 45 -45 0 0
-45 90 45
(a) Ply Level (b) Superply Level
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
T_45Ply
T_ - 45Ply
Balance_45Ply, T_45Ply = T_ - 45Ply
Composite Manufacturing Constraints
Min/Max Total Laminate Thickness Min/Max Individual Ply Thickness (e.g., Min/Max 0-Deg Thickness…) Min/Max Individual Ply Angle Percentage (e.g, Ply90 %...) Balanced Ply Angles (i.e. Balance +/- 45’s) Constant Individual Ply Thickness Ply Draping Accommodation Zone based Pattern Grouping Ply Drop-Off Constraints Can be applied to Composite Free-Size and Composite Size Optimization
T = Ply4 (nom) 45
PCOMP
T = Ply3 (nom) 90
T = Ply2 (nom) -45
T = Ply1 (nom) 0
T_Laminate Min/Max T_0Ply Min/Max = Sum(T_0Ply)
T = Ply1 (nom) 0
T = Ply2 (nom) -45
T = Ply3 (nom) 90
T = Ply4 (nom) 45
T_Laminate
T_90Ply (1)
Ply90% =
Sum(T_90Ply)/T_Laminate
T_90Ply (2)
T_0Ply Constant
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite – Concept Design
Manufacturing Constraints:
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite – Concept Design
Manufacturing Constraints:
),( | | :rate drop Ply kjdistikij xx
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Manufacturing Constraints
• Ply Drop-Off Constraints
• Reduce stress concentrations leading to failure through delamination
• Thickness drop-off for free-sizing
• Actual drop-off for sizing
• Directional drop-off control
• Constraints can be defined based on the slope or thickness
• Available in composite free sizing optimization (element based)
• Available in composite sizing optimization (property/ply based)
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Drop – Off Constraints: Plate Example
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Manufacturing Constraints
• Visualization of Manufacturing Constraints in H3D
No Drop-Off
Constraint Ply Thickness
Ply Thickness
1% Drop-Off
Constraint
Ply Drop-Off
Contour
Max =1%
Ply Drop-Off
Contour
Max =20%
Cantilever
Plate
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Usability Enhancements
• Automatic Offset Updating (ZOFFS and Z0)
• Improved process for working with and optimizing models where the mesh is at
TOP or BOTTOM surface of physical thickness
• Works with shells and composites
• Works for free sizing and sizing optimization
• Automatic Generation of Ply Bundle Sizing Model (OUTPUT,FSTOSZ)
• Rewritten using a pure ply based approach
• Advanced algorithm to capture thickness variation is now available for 2, 4 and 8
ply bundles
• Multiple ply bundle generation methods (ADVFREE, ADVMAN, SIMFREE,
SIMMAN)
• IGNORE option for plies with very low thicknesses
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Usability Enhancements
• Designable Core Layer
• Core can also be free-sized
• Used with SMCORE (smeared core) laminate definition
• Optionally, can be set as non-design
• Support for Mixed Ply Structures
• Different ply layups for different properties
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Manufacturing Constraints
• Constraints can be defined BYPLY and BYSET (set of plies) in addition
to BYANG (by orientation)
• Comprehensive solution allowing various options to apply manufacturing
constraints
• Constraints by material can be applied using BYSET option
• Constraints can be defined locally
• Account for regions requiring reinforcements such as bolt or mounting locations
• Different manufacturing requirements for different sections of the design
• EXCLUDE option to exclude CORE or CONST (plies defined in the
CONSTant constraint) from certain manufacturing constraints
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Free Size Optimization – Manufacturing Constraints
• Consistent syntax on the DSIZE (free sizing) and DCOMP (ply bundle
sizing) cards
• Manufacturing constraints are automatically carried over from free sizing to sizing
• Preserves continuity of manufacturing constraints across the optimization process
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Bombardier Composites Optimization
Optimization of Composites – Zone-Based Pattern Grouping and DRESP3
Successful integration/application of
composite optimization process in live
aerospace design environment
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Composite Wing
Composite skins with 0, +45/-45, 90 plies
Manufacturing Constraints:
max. ply thickness ≤ 10 mm
+45/-45 plies linked
8 mm ≤ total thickness ≤ 32 mm
min. ply percentage ≥ 10%
Minimize Mass
Subject to:
Tip displacement constraints
(Bounds different for 10 load cases)
Phase I - Concept: Free-Size
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
PLY DROP-OFF – WING EXAMPLE
NO DROP-OFF
CONSTRAINT
PLY THICKNESS
PLY THICKNESS
WITH 1% DROP-OFF
CONSTRAINT
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Ply sequence optimisation
• Utilities created to generate solid visualisation of plies
• Thickness scale factor applied (x5)
• Element & ply Z offsets included
• Top cover:
Copyright © 2013 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
OSSmooth Enhancements – Ply Shape Interpretation
• Benefits
• FE based plies need to be manually interpreted
• OSSmooth interprets ply shapes
• Ply boundary smoothing
• Treatment for small ply patch regions – keep or discard
• Disconnected patches can be created as separate ply entities
• OptiStruct ply bundle sizing deck is generated with updated data
• Streamlined overall composite optimization process
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
elimination of small regions
smoothing on ply shapes
Example – ply shape interpretation
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
SmallRegion = 0.001 (by area ratio)
SmallRegion = 0.003 (by area ratio)
original ply shape
Example – ply shape interpretation
Copyright © 2012 Altair Engineering, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. All rights reserved.
Conclusions
• Comprehensive Composite Optimization Process
• Three-Phase optimization process – from concept to Ply-Book details
• Manufacturing constraints through out the process
• Ply-Drop constraints
• Ply shape smoothing tool
• Quick adoption by aero, race car, yacht industries
• Ongoing R&D
• Stress/strain/failure index constraints for Free-Size phase