Recent developments in WTO and food subsides in India
-
Upload
sunil-kumar-br -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
26 -
download
1
Transcript of Recent developments in WTO and food subsides in India
Recent developments in WTO and food subsides in India
SUNIL KUMAR B.R20637
IARI 2
content
• Introduction- WTO and agreements• Ministerial conference -Issues in agriculture• Trends in Indian subsidies and its composition• Trade distortions- effect of subsidies on other countries and
vice versa • Food subsidy• Conclusion
IARI 3
World Trade Organization
• Established In 1995.• 1986-94 Uruguay Round – led to WTO’s creation.• WTO is the successor to the GATT.• GATT is now the WTO’s principal rule-book for trade in
goods.• Merchandise exports grew on average by 6% annually, Total
trade in 2000 was 22 times the level of 1950.• More than 300 cases in ten years-DSB.• The goal is to improve the welfare of the people of the
member countries.
IARI 4
Functions of WTO
• It’s a negotiating forum
• It’s a set of rules
• It helps to settle disputes
• Assisting developing countries
• Cooperating with other
international organizations
• Reviewing national trade
policies
Principles of the trading system
• Non-discrimination.
• Reciprocity
• Binding and enforceable
commitments
• Transparency
• Safety valves
World Trade Organization
IARI 5
MINISTERIAL CONFERENCES Ministerial conference Host city
Outcome
1st 9–13 December 1996, Singapore
Disagreements largely between developed and developing economies ,over "Singapore issues“Tradefacilitation,tradeinvestment,tradecompt.
2nd 18–20 May 1998, Geneva trade negoatation.
3rd 30 November – 3 December 1999, Seattle, United States Ended in failure,
4th 9–14 November 2001, Doha, Qatar
The Doha Development Round was launched at the conference. The conference also approved the joining of China, which became the 143rd member of WTO.
5th 10–14 September 2003,Cancún, Mexico
Aiming at forging agreement on the Doha round. An alliance of 22 southern states, resisted demands from the North for agreements on the so-called "Singapore issues" and called for an end to agricultural subsidies within the EU and the US. The talks broke down without progress.
IARI 6
CONTD…
6th 13–18 December 2005Hong Kong
In this meeting, countries agreed to phase out all their agricultural export subsidies by the end of 2013, and terminate any cotton export subsidies by the end of 2006.
7th 30 November – 2 December 2009, Geneva
The general theme for discussion was "The WTO, the Multilateral Trading System and the Current Global Economic Environment".
8th15–17 December 2011,Geneva Membership agreement where made
for Russia, Samoa, and Montenegro.
9th3–6 December 2013Bali, Indonesia
159 members of WTO agreed to the Bali Package which eases barriers to international trade.
10th15–18 December 2015Nairobi, Kenya
The completion of Afghanistan and Liberia's accession to the WTO will be on the agenda.
IARI 7
MINISTERIAL CONFERENCES RELATED TO AGRICULTURE
Uruguay Round (1986)
Extending the trading system into many new areas, notably, service sector and intellectual property.
Uruguay Round Agreement aimed at discouraging trade-distorting domestic support, non-tariff barriers, and reducing direct export subsides,
Reform trade in sensitive sectors of Agriculture and textiles. It was proposed that Public procurement of Agro-products must
not exceed 10% of its total production value. considered as an anti-farmer proposal and hurts agrarian
economies.Uruguay Round mostly benefits the developed countries. (Participation gap).
IARI 8
Doha Development Round(2001)
• Including negotiations, wide range of issues concerning developing countries.
• One focus of the Doha Round was the easing of agricultural product access into the WTO market by reaching agreement regarding three controversial agricultural themes: the reduction of tariffs on imported agricultural goods, the reduction of subsidies for exported agricultural goods, and the reduction of subsidies for domestic agricultural goods.
• The negotiations reached a deadlock, and continues to do so till date, between Developed countries and Developing countries, on the precise terms of a 'special safeguard measure' to protect farmers from imports of cheaper and better quality agro products from the developed countries.
IARI 9
Bali Round (2013)
• Includes provisions for lowering import tariffs and agricultural subsidies, with the intention of making it easier for developing countries to trade with the developed. 1st agreement by all.
• Covers food security in developing countries, Public Stockholding for Food Security Purposes.
• Measures for Least developed countries (LDCs) and developing countries, including preferential treatment and market access.
• Duty-Free and Quota-Free (DFQF) Market Access for Least-Developed Countries.
• The Bali and the General Council's November 2014 decision on public stockholding which gives protection to farmers has been reaffirmed.
Source: WTO
IARI 10
Nairobi Round (2015)
• Developed countries immediately eliminate their remaining scheduled
export subsidy entitlements. Developing countries shall eliminate their
export subsidy entitlements by the end of 2018.
• The members of the global trade body agreed on a commitment for giving
the developing nations a right to take recourse to Special Safeguard
Mechanism to protect their farmers, which was a long-standing demand of
India.
• Phase out export subsidies on cotton; for developed nations immediately,
while it has been marked for developing countries not later January 1, 2017.
Source: WTO
IARI 11
Clash between developed and developing Countries in Nairobi.
Contention of the Developing Countries
• India has expressed disappointment on removal of cotton subsidy altogether by 01 January 2017, and a few other provisions related to phasing out of export subsidies.
Contention of Developed Countries
• The biggest demand of the developed countries is to abolish agricultural export subsidies.
• The US and EU wants to launch new negotiations but a majority of WTO members want to continue with the Doha negotiations.
IARI 12
India and WTO
• India enjoys the most favoured nation (MFN) status with all the other
members of the WTO.
• The GATT secretariat estimated that largest increase in the level of
merchandise trade in goods(clothing ,ag, fishery), India's competitive
advantage lies in these fields, obtain large gains.
• India's textile and clothing exports will increase due to Multi-fibre
Arrangement (MFA) .
• The multilateral rules and disciplines, favourable environment for India's
international business .
• The reduction in barriers to export of agricultural products, agricultural exports
from India will increase.
IARI 13
Agreements Importance
Anti-Dumping charging extra import duty in order to bring its price closer to the “normal value” in the importing country.
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement(SPS)
It allows countries to set their own standards.
Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT) Aims to ensure that technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures are non-discriminatory and do not create unnecessary obstacles to trade.
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights(TRIPS)
Sets down minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property (IP) regulation as applied to nationals of other WTO Members.
Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIM)
Rules that apply to the domestic regulations a country applies to foreign investors.
Agreement on Agriculture(AOA) 1.market access 2.domestic support 3.export subsidy
AGREEMENTS IN WTO
IARI 14
History of AOA
• 1950- The idea of replacing agricultural price support with direct payments
to farmers .
• 1958- Haberler Report stressed the importance of minimizing the effect of
agriculture subsidies on competitiveness and recommended replacing price
support with direct supplementary payments
• 1980- government payments to agricultural producers in industrialized
countries had caused large crop surpluses .
• 1986 GATT Ministerial Conference in Uruguay, farm lobbies in developed
countries strongly resisted compromises on agriculture.
• The idea of exempting production and "trade-neutral" subsidies from WTO
commitments was first proposed by the United States and EU.
IARI 15
Agreement on Agriculture (1995)
• The Uruguay Round marked a significant turning point in world trade in agriculture.
• The products-normally considered as part of agriculture except that it excludes
fishery and forestry products.
• Aims:
• Fair and market oriented trading system .
• Commitments on support and protection reduction.
• Operationally effective GATT Rules & Disciplines.
• Commitment to Equitable Trade Reform process.
• Greater opportunities and Terms of Access to Developing countries.
• Concern for LDCs.
• Concern on Non-trade issues such as Food Security, environment, health, etc.
IARI 16
Pillars of AOAMarket Access Domestic Support Export Subsidies
Converting NTBs into tariff barriers
subject to reduction commitments.
Subsidies promoting foreign trade.
36% average reduction by developed countries, with a minimum per-tariff line reduction of 15% over six years.
Europe and the United States to spend billion $ a year on agricultural subsidies.
Reduced by: 20% in developed countries13.3% in developingcountries.
Value of subsidyBy 36% over 6 years for developed countries.By 24% over 10 years for developing countries.No reductions for least developed countries
24% average reduction by developing countries with a minimum per-tariff line reduction of 10% over ten years.
Green box ,Blue box, Amber boxCauses dumping in poor countries.
Quantity of exportBy 21% over 6 years for developed countries.By 14% over 10 years for developing countries.No reduction for least developed countries
SOURCE: WTO
IARI 17
12%
31%
51%
66%
114%
62%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Current
US EU Japan Korea India Global
Market Access current statusAverage Agriculture Tariff
us
EU
japan
Korea
India
global
SOURCE: WTO
Agriculture: Proposals for market access Market Access: Average Ag Tariff
12%3% 5% 6%
31%
6% 9% 13%
51%
7% 12% 15%
66%
14%
29% 29%
114%
28%
70% 70%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Current U.S. Proposal G-20 Proposal EU Proposal
US EU Japan Korea India
SOURCE: WTO Hong Kong ministerial conference
IARI 19
Post WTO trade scenario for major commodities and future strategy for India
products Trade scene Main factor Future strategy
Rice Export adverselyaffected; Importthreat
Increased competitionfrom developing countrieslike Vietnam, ThailandLow prices and subsidies
Improved competitivenessdomestic production
Wheat Export adverselyaffected; ImportThreat
Low prices and subsidiesand support in EU and US
Seek elimination of exportsubsidies and domesticsupport in OECD
Oilcake Export adverselyaffected
East Asia crisis and GMvarieties in USA, Argentinaand Brazil; Subsidies in USA
Improved varieties of oilseedsparticularly soybean; Seekreduction in subsidies in USA
Sugar Export adverselyaffected
Subsidies in EU and USA Seek elimination of exportsubsidies and domesticsupport in EU and USA
Cotton Export adverselyaffected; Importsincreased
Decline in domesticproduction and subsidiesin USA
Seek elimination of domesticsupport in USA; Technologiesto compete with Bt cotton
Source: www.wto.org
IARI 20
GREENBOX • minimum trade distortion• subsidies allowed
Public funded government programmes
• research• extension• food security• disaster management• control of pests & diseases• structural adjustments Etc.
BLUE BOX • minimum trade distortion• subsidies allowed• such payments are made on
85 percent or less of the base level of production
Public funded government programmes
• Production limiting programmes• Participation in insurance• Income safety net programmes
AMBER BOX • trade distortion• subsidies NOT allowed
beyond specific level.• Given up to-Developed
countries less than 5% of total value of agricultural production, developing countries 10% and L D C no bar
subsidies a country can give to its farm sector.Product Specific: Seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, pesticides, electricity, credit.Non-Product Specific: Minimum support price
Domestic support
IARI 21
0102030405060708090
100
U.S. EU - 25 Japan
Domestic Support – amber box:
Billion $ at current ratesSOURCE: WTO HONG KONG MENISTERIAL CONFERANCE
IARI 22
Subsidies offered as % in total value of agricultural products by various countries (2012-13)
Country % share of subsidy in total value of agricultural products
Japan 72.5Columbia 54.0S.Korea 61.0Europe 37.0China 34.0Pakistan 26.0USA 28.8INDIA 03.0
Source: www.wto.org
IARI 23
Export prices of primary agricultural commodities in post WTO period (1995=100)
Source: WTO International Trade Statistics 2006
1995 1996 2000 20050
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
CEREALSFISHSHRIMBEVERAGESSUGARCOTTON
IARI 24
Export Subsidies
EU(over $2 billiona year)
Other3.0%
U.S.1.8%
Switzerland6.4%
Norway3%
EU87.8%
Source: www.wto.org
IARI 25
Impact on Indian Agriculture
• India gains when?-As reduction in domestic support and export subsidies in the developed countries leading to substantial gains to the producers in developing countries.
• Apart from direct price effect there is lagged effect through agricultural wages and employment (Winters, 2002).
• In rice where the level of input subsidy is high, free trade would not be sufficient to counter the adverse impact on income due to withdrawal of subsidies.(Chand1999).
• The total Product Specific AMS continues to be negative and the Non-Product specific AMS is also well within the de minimis level i.e. 4.85% in the base year 1986-88.
IARI 26
• India is one of the six countries who has been maintaining quantitative
restrictions (QRs).Items including 147 agricultural products have been
removed on 1st April, 2001. While the removal of QRs has not changed
the overall rate of growth of imports or even their composition.
• The experience of the implementation of AoA reveals that the world
prices of food products have been steadily declining threatening the
livelihood of producers in many developing countries.
Conti…
IARI 27
Special Products in the WTO
• Developing countries are permitted untargeted subsidised food
distribution to meet requirements of the urban and rural poor.
Safeguarding domestic food production capacity an essential
component of food security strategies .
• Special products are self-designated agricultural products that have
flexibility in reduction commitments based on the criteria of food
security, livelihood security and rural development needs.
• As a result designation some of the agricultural products as Special
products .
IARI 28
• Allowing self-designation of SPs, the developing countries would gain the
legitimate right to safeguard their agrarian interest.
• Special safeguard mechanism: Right of certain developing countries to impose
additional duties on imported agricultural products to make them more expensive in
the local market.
• In 2004 Special Products the new devices for developing countries, adopted in the
framework of AoA.
• the developing countries would accrue Benefits by designating an appropriate
number of special products based on,
1.Food Security,
2.Livelihood Security and
3.Rural Development needs.
IARI 29
Benefits from SP
• As contribution of agriculture to GDP and employment in developing countries provision of SPs would protect the agriculture.
• Special Products would support domestic production.
• The designation of SP product is one of the crucial development instruments in trade for the developing countries.
• Designation of the special products should be based on the particular country’s strategy of development
• A pilot study is necessary before the designation of SPs.
IARI 30
Food subsidy
• Food prices play an important role in the well-being of the poor and poverty
reduction in developing countries.
• Therefore, government interventions in food grains markets have existed in
one form or another for several decades
• small food price increases may adversely affect the ability of poor
consumers to meet their basic needs.
• food subsidies are needed to protect the welfare and nutritional status of the
economically disadvantaged people.
IARI 31
Food subsidy as percentage of agricultural GDP
SOURCE: Economic survey, 2015-16
IARI 32
Cost of Food Subsidy
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16*
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
Amount
Amount
Source: economic survey, 2015-16
• food subsidies are under increasing criticism because of their large impact on government budget deficits.
• benefits often do not reach the poor.• Food subsidies an increase of over 25 times in 21 years• As a percentage of agricultural GDP, the food subsidy
increased from 1.8 per cent to 5.8 percent during 1991-92 and 2010-11.
• The difference between the Economic Cost and the Central Issue Price is reimbursed by the Government of India as consumer subsidy to the Food Corporation of India (FCI).
CONTD…
IARI 33
IARI 34
Source: GoI (2012c)
• Source: GoI (2012c)
Source: GoI (2012)
CONSUMER SUBSIDY IN WHEAT
IARI 35
PERCENT SHARE OF SUBSIDY IN TOTAL BUDGET
SOURCE: http://www.thehindu.com/business/budget/budget-2016
IARI 36Source: http://www.thehindu.com/business/budget/budget-2016
IARI 37Source: http://www.thehindu.com/business/budget/budget-2016
IARI 38
Reasons for increase in food subsidy
• steep rise in minimum support/procurement prices,• Accumulation of large stocks of grains• rising economic costs of food grains, • high off take of food grains under targeted public
distribution system and other welfare schemes.• inefficient functioning of Food Corporation of India.
IARI 39
Policy Options for reducing Food Subsidies
• Decentralized Procurement: Promote Public-Public and Public-Private Partnership.
• Stop Open-ended Procurement of Food grains• Periodic Increase in Central Issue Price.• Reduction in Procurement Incidentals and
Distribution and Carrying Costs.
IARI 40
Complainant Respondent Problem Remarks
India Turkey Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products
Turkey agreed to:remove the quantitative restrictions it applies on textile categoriesof imports from India.
India European Communities
Restrictions on Certain Import Duites onRice.
EC Regulation establishing a so called cumulative recovery system (CRS), for determining certain import duties on rice
India European Communities
Anti Dumping Duties on Imports ‐of Cotton typeBed Linen from India
Panel investigating EU for limiting its examination in this investigation
Some agricultural disputes
IARI 41
Complainant Respondent Problem Remarks
India Brazil Anti Dumping Duties on ‐Jute Bags from India
the determination to continue the anti‐dumping duties allegedly nullifies and impairs benefits accruing to India under, or otherwise impedes the attainment of objectives of, the cited agreements.
United States India Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and AgriculturalChemical Products
DSB meeting of 22 April 1998, the parties announced that they had agreed on an implementation period of 15 months from the date of the adoption of the reports.
United States India Measures Concerning the Importation of Certain AgriculturalProducts-United States concerns related to Avian Influenza
India to implement the DSB recommendations and rulings shall be 12 months from the date of adoption of the Appellate Body and panel reports. cause they are not “based on” the relevant international standard
IARI 42
Conclusion
• Agriculture should be subjected to world competition, but domestic policy support must continue.
• Implementation of WTO would have a mixed impact on net social welfare of India.
• In conclusion, let us remember the quote from our eminent agricultural scientist, Dr M S Swaminathan, “India should ensure that all boxes in the WTO must be abolished, and trade distortion, and unfair practices must be spelt out clearly and factors governing sustainable livelihood should be recognised so that resource- poor, developing countries should be able to place restrictions on imports.”
IARI 43
Cont..
• India does not provide any export subsidy except the permissible internal and international transport subsidies and handling and processing charges to reduce marketing costs of exports of agricultural produce.
• The removal of QRs has not changed the overall rate of growth of imports or even their composition.
• It was also done to catch up with the rising global prices and to compensate the farmers with increasing cost of production.
• Raising the level of productivity and quality standards to internationally competitive levels is one of the major challenges following the dismantling of quantitative restrictions on imports, as per the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.
IARI 44
THANK YOU