Real-time, Media-enhanced Feedback Improves Neonatal ...

1
RESULTS I CONCLUSIONS Real - time, Media - enhanced Feedback Improves Neonatal Intubation Skills Clara Song MD, Agnes Choi BS, Brooke Roebuck MD, Douglas Dannaway MD, Michael Anderson PhD, Edgardo Szyld MD University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES RESULTS II Neonatal intubation= “low frequency, high consequence” event Low median success rates in trainees, as low as 33%. Success rates if <20 attempts: 37% Neonatal intubation using videolaryngoscopy (VL) was used in the delivery room and NICU without complications or difficulties. VL is feasible No differences were noted in success rate or times with VL or direct laryngoscopy (DL). In difficult airway scenarios, time to intubate was longer with VL. VL is preferred but not helpful METHODS I Google Glass™ is a feasible tool for teaching endotracheal intubation. The addition of Google Glass™ when teaching neonatal intubation shortens time to successful intubation and increases confidence scores in a simulation environment. Statistical analysis: Exams and Confidence surveys were completed at the end of the teaching session. Categorical variables were tabulated using frequencies/percentages and compared between groups using a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, tabulated using the mean (SD) or median (IQR) and compared using Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Outcome measures: 1. Total number of EI attempts until successful intubation 2. Time recorded until successful EI 3. Confidence survey scores 4. Lesson 5 NRP assessment test scores NEONATAL-PERINATAL MEDICINE College of Medicine Pediatrics Supported by grant from the Neonatal-Perinatal Section, Dept of Pediatrics OUHSC General Aim: To evaluate the use of a video-enhanced educational tool with real-time feedback capabilities, Google Glass ™ (GG), on endotracheal intubation (EI) performance. Specific Aims: To measure students’ performance, To improve students’ basic clinical knowledge and To improve students’ level of confidence, in performing a neonatal endotracheal intubation (EI) with the use of Google Glass™ (GG). Prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial IRB-approved, AY 2015-16. OU medical students, class of 2017 during Pediatric clerkship After consent, Students were randomized (by group) to traditional or GG training groups for EI education. Maximum of 3 Practice attempts (traditional/GG), and 3 Test attempts (all w/o GG) was allowed. Each EI attempt was limited to 30 seconds A successful EI was defined as: - correct placement within 30 seconds - confirmed by chest wall movement and visual confirmation by the instructor METHODS II Seven clerkships were randomized, and after exclusions for administrative reasons, a total of 72 students were included. (22 in the control group and 50 in the GG group. The proportion of successful attempts did not differ significantly between groups. Time to intubation for practice attempt 2, test 1 time, and test 2 time were all significantly shorter in the treatment group. Also, subjects in the treatment group report a significantly higher confidence scores but did not differ significantly from the controls with regard to the NRP exam scores, which were high for both groups.

Transcript of Real-time, Media-enhanced Feedback Improves Neonatal ...

Page 1: Real-time, Media-enhanced Feedback Improves Neonatal ...

RESULTS I

CONCLUSIONS

Real-time, Media-enhanced Feedback Improves Neonatal Intubation SkillsClara Song MD, Agnes Choi BS, Brooke Roebuck MD, Douglas Dannaway MD, Michael Anderson PhD, Edgardo Szyld MD

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVES

RESULTS II

• Neonatal intubation= “low frequency, high consequence” event

• Low median success rates in trainees, as low as 33%. Success rates if <20 attempts: 37%

• Neonatal intubation using videolaryngoscopy (VL) was used in the delivery room and NICU without complications or difficulties. VL is feasible

• No differences were noted in success rate or times with VL or direct laryngoscopy (DL). In difficult airway scenarios, time to intubate was longer with VL. VL is preferred but not helpful

METHODS I

• Google Glass™ is a feasible tool for teaching endotracheal intubation.

• The addition of Google Glass™ when teaching neonatal intubation shortens time to successful intubation and increases confidence scores in a simulation environment.

Statistical analysis: Exams and Confidence surveys were completed at the end of the teaching session. Categorical variables were tabulated using frequencies/percentages and compared between groups using a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, tabulated using the mean (SD) or median (IQR) and compared using Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.Outcome measures: 1. Total number of EI attempts until successful intubation2. Time recorded until successful EI3. Confidence survey scores4. Lesson 5 NRP assessment test scores

NEONATAL-PERINATAL MEDICINECollege of Medicine

PediatricsSupported by grant from the Neonatal-Perinatal Section, Dept of Pediatrics OUHSC

General Aim:• To evaluate the use of a video-enhanced educational tool

with real-time feedback capabilities, Google Glass ™ (GG), on endotracheal intubation (EI) performance.

Specific Aims:• To measure students’ performance,• To improve students’ basic clinical knowledge and • To improve students’ level of confidence, in performing a

neonatal endotracheal intubation (EI) with the use of Google Glass™ (GG).

• Prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial• IRB-approved, AY 2015-16. OU medical students, class of

2017 during Pediatric clerkship• After consent, Students were randomized (by group) to

traditional or GG training groups for EI education. • Maximum of 3 Practice attempts (traditional/GG), and 3

Test attempts (all w/o GG) was allowed. Each EI attempt

was limited to 30 seconds• A successful EI was defined as:

- correct placement within 30 seconds- confirmed by chest wall movement and visual

confirmation by the instructor

METHODS II

• Seven clerkships were randomized, and after exclusions for administrative reasons, a total of 72 students were included. (22 in the control group and 50 in the GG group.

• The proportion of successful attempts did not differ significantly between groups.

• Time to intubation for practice attempt 2, test 1 time, and test 2 time were all significantly shorter in the treatment group.

• Also, subjects in the treatment group report a significantly higher confidence scores but did not differ significantly from the controls with regard to the NRP exam scores, which were high for both groups.