REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

18
Rome, 8-9 July 2008 1 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN – DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUCTION Daliute Kavaliauskiene Bronislava Kaminskiene Statistics Lithuania

description

REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION. Daliute Kavaliauskiene Bronislava Kaminskien e Statistics Lithuania. SUBJECT-MATTER. MEANS USED TO REDUCE THE BURDEN ON RESPONDENTS MEASUREMENT OF RESPONSE BURDEN. ORGANISATION OF WORK. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Page 1: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 1

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT

AND REDUCTION

Daliute Kavaliauskiene

Bronislava Kaminskiene

Statistics Lithuania

Page 2: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 2

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

SUBJECT-MATTER

1. MEANS USED TO REDUCE THE BURDEN ON RESPONDENTS

2. MEASUREMENT OF RESPONSE BURDEN

Page 3: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 3

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

ORGANISATION OF WORK

A PERMANENT WORKING GROUP ON RESPONSE BURDEN SINCE 2003

AN ACTION PLAN RENEWED ANNUALLY

Page 4: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 4

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

MEANS USED

1. REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF STATISTICAL SURVEYS

2. REVISION OF STATISTICAL QUESTIONNAIRES

3. IMPROVEMENT OF SAMPLING PROCEDURES

4. APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DATA IN STATISTICAL SURVEYS

5. NEW IT TECHNOLOGIES FOR STATISTICAL DATA COLLECTION

Page 5: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 5

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

REDUCTION OF STATISTICAL SURVEYS

JOINING TOGETHER SEVERAL SURVEYS

ABOLITION OF SURVEYS

0

50

100

150

200

250

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year

Nu

mb

er o

f q

ues

tio

nn

aire

s

Total

Businessstatistics

Page 6: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 6

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

REVISION OF STATISTICAL QUESTIONNAIRES

ABOLITION OF IRRELEVANT INDICATORS

IMPROVEMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL GUIDELINES FOR FILLING IN STATISTICAL QUESTIONNAIRES

Page 7: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 7

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

IMPROVEMENT OF SAMPLING PROCEDURES

REDUCING THE SAMPLE SIZES

TRYING TO DISTRIBUTE THE RESPONSE BURDEN MORE EVENLY AMONG BUSINESSES

Page 8: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 8

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DATA IN STATISTICAL SURVEYS

2 STS INDICATORS BASED ON ADMINSTRATIVE DATA OF THE STATE SOCIAL INSURANCE FUND BOARD

NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES

WAGES AND SALARIES

SBS INDICATORS FOR ENTERPRISES WITH UP TO 10 EMPLOYEES BASED ON ANNUAL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS FROM STATE TAX INSPECTORATE

ABOUT 16 THOUS. RESPONDENTS

Page 9: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 9

European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

NEW IT TECHNOLOGIES FOR STATISTICAL DATA COLLECTION

INTRODUCTION OF E-QUESTIONNAIRES

DRAFT PROJECT ON THE POSSIBILITY TO EXTRACT DATA DIRECTLY FROM BUSINESS ACCOUNTANCY SYSTEMS

Page 10: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 10 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

PARTICIPATION OF ENTERPRISES IN STATISTICAL SURVEYS

  2005 2006 2007 2008

Number of active enterprises 72 330 73 334 76 516 81 376

Number of enterprises participating in at least one statistical survey

46 717 45 025 45 384 45 742

Participation rate in percent 65% 61% 59% 56%

Average number of surveys per enterprise

3,7 3,6 3,5 3,4

Number of questionnaires for enterprises

187 175 157 157

Average number of questionnaires per enterprise

6,8 6,9 6,5 6,1

Page 11: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 11 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

REASONS TO START MEASUREMENT OF THE STATISTICAL RESPONSE BURDEN

POLITICAL INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT

RESPONSE BURDEN – ONE OF THE QUALITY DIMENSIONS IN TQM SYSTEM

IMPLEMENTATION OF IDEAS TO REDUCE THE BURDEN

Page 12: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 12 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

THE MAIN RESPONSE BURDEN INDICATOR

ADVENTAGES:

1. EASY TO COMPARE AMONG DIFFERENT TYPE OF ACTIVITIES, SIZE OF AN ENTERPRISES, E.T.C.

2. EASY TO COMPARE AMONG COUNTRIES

3. EASY TO CALCULATE FOR DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS (IRRESPECTIVE OF LABOUR COSTS)

4. EASY FOR RESPONDENTS TO REPORT DATA

TIME USED TO FILL IN QUESTIONNAIRES

Page 13: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 13 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

EVALUATION OF THE RESPONSE BURDEN

ALL QUESTIONNAIRES SUPPLEMENTED BY A QUESTION ON THE RESPONSE BURDEN

TIME AVERAGE AND MEDIAN CALCULATED FOR QUESTIONNAIRES

THE TOTAL RESPONSE BURDEN CALCULATED FOR ALL BUSINESSES IN THE SAMPLE

THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY IS TO MEASURE THE BURDEN IMPOSED ON BUSINESSES, NOT THE ACTUAL RESPONSE BURDEN

Page 14: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 14 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

RESULTS OF EVALUATION OF RESPONSE BURDEN

TIME USED TO FILL IN QUESTIONNAIRES, HOURS

13.3 12.9

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2006 2007

DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBER BUSINESSES BY TIME USED, %

39

29

18

6

8

less than 1 hour

from 1 to 2 hours

from 2 to 5 hours

from 5 to 8 hours

more than 8

Page 15: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 15 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

ANALYSIS OF DATA

TENDENCY OF THE RESPONDENTS TO OVERESTIMATE THE STATISTICAL BURDEN IN COMPARISON WITH OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OBLIGATIONS

HUGE VARIABILITY OF DATA SHOWS THE IMPACT OF THE HUMAN FACTOR ON THE RESPONSE BURDEN ESTIMATION

REAL AND IMAGINATIVE (SUBJECTIVE) RESPONSE BURDEN – TWO COMPONENTS OF THE SAME PHENOMENON

Page 16: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 16 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SUBJECTIVE RESPONSE BURDEN

TOO HEAVY REAL RESPONSE BURDEN

GAP IN INFORMATION ON RESPONSE BURDEN OF OTHER BUSINESSES

LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DATA PROVIDED

INSUFFICIENT DIALOG OF STATISTICIANS WITH RESPONDENTS

Page 17: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 17 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

WAYS TO REDUCE RESPONSE BURDEN

1. ALLOCATION OF SAMPLES AS EVENLY AS POSSIBLE OVER THE POPULATION

2. MORE INFORMATION FOR THE RESPONDENTS ON THE RESPONSE BURDEN

3. INCREASED DIALOG WITH RESPONDENTS

4. FEEDBACK FOR THE RESPONDENTS

Page 18: REAL AND IMAGINATIVE RESPONSE BURDEN –DIFFERENT WAYS OF TREATMENT, MEASUREMENT AND REDUC TION

Rome, 8-9 July 2008 18 European conference on Quality www.stat.gov.lt

Thank you.Questions are welcome