Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of...

13
Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report

Transcript of Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of...

Page 1: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report

Page 2: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students(ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards)

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

  Grade 5   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100

  Grade 7   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

  Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100MATHEMATICS

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100

  Grade 5   59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100

  Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100

  Grade 7   40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100

  Grade 8   48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

  Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

No Child Left Behind and AYP

Page 3: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.
Page 4: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

95 % 0.0 or

above

HS or schools with Grade 12: 90 % GR or improvement

Grades 3 - 8: 95% attendance rate

Page 5: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students(ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards)

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 4 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

  Grade 5   73 73 77 77 81 85 88 92 96 100

  Grade 6 74 74 78 78 81 81 85 89 93 96 100

  Grade 7   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 8 43 43 51 51 59 59 67 76 84 92 100

  Grade 11 81 81 84 84 86 86 89 92 95 97 100MATHEMATICS

  2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  Grade 3   63 63 68 68 74 79 84 89 95 100

  Grade 4 61 61 67 67 72 72 78 83 89 94 100

  Grade 5   59 59 65 65 71 77 82 88 94 100

  Grade 6 39 39 48 48 56 56 65 74 83 91 100

  Grade 7   40 40 49 49 57 66 74 83 91 100

  Grade 8   48 48 55 55 63 70 78 85 93 100

  Grade 11 68 68 73 73 77 77 82 86 91 95 100

Page 6: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

By the number of subgroups

Page 7: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

5

5 4

4

1

Page 8: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

School Improvement

• Goals over time• School performance this year and prior years• Two consecutive years in the same component

Page 9: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

“Two and Two”

No AYP

SI 1

Made AYP Not in SI

SI 1 D

SI 2

Page 10: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

Reading

No AYPReading

SI Year 1

Mathematics

SI Year1D

Reading

SI Year 2

Mathematics

No AYPMathematics

SI Year 1

AAI

No AYPAAI

SI Year 1 AAI

SI Year 3AAI

SI Year 2

Page 11: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

There are 4 Ways to Make AYP

• Meet proficiency• Confidence Interval (CI)• Uniform Averaging (UA)• Safe Harbor (SH)

Page 12: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

Partial CreditPartial Credit

• Students scoring in Levels III or IV are considered to be proficient and count as 1.0 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Level II are considered to be partially proficient and count as 0.5 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Levels III or IV are considered to be proficient and count as 1.0 toward proficiency.

• Students scoring in Level II are considered to be partially proficient and count as 0.5 toward proficiency.

Page 13: Reading and Interpreting the AYP Status Report. ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIV ES Percentage of Proficient Students (ARMT & AHSGE Baseline Standards) 20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014.

Need More Information?

• Follow this path to get to the Interpretive Guide document:

– www.alsde.edu – Sections– Student Assessment– Publications– Choose document and download

• Follow this path to get to the Sanctions and Rewards document:– www.alsde.edu – Sections– Federal Programs– Publications– Choose document and download