Reaction Powered Car CBEE 101 Fall 2009 Hailey DeMarre, Michael Lougee, Peter Shoaf Dr. Skip...

5
Reaction Powered Car CBEE 101 Fall 2009 Hailey DeMarre, Michael Lougee, Peter Shoaf Dr. Skip Rochefort
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    219
  • download

    1

Transcript of Reaction Powered Car CBEE 101 Fall 2009 Hailey DeMarre, Michael Lougee, Peter Shoaf Dr. Skip...

Reaction Powered Car

CBEE 101 Fall 2009Hailey DeMarre, Michael Lougee, Peter Shoaf

Dr. Skip Rochefort

The Alka-Seltzer Reaction• Reactants: Citric Acid (aq) and Sodium Bicarbonate (aq)• Products: Water (L), Carbon Dioxide (g), and Sodium Citrate (aq)• Balanced Equation:

C6H8O7(aq)+3NaHCO3(aq)→3H2O(l)+3CO2(g)+Na3C6H5O7(aq) • Solving for the amount of reactants to use:

Ideal Gas Law: P=nrT/v => Pv/rT = nThe pressure was supposed to be about 5 atm; P=5 atm.The gas constant is always the same; r=0.08205 atm-L/mol-K.The outside temperature was about 7 degrees C, or 280K; T=280K.The volume of the Propel bottle is 700 mL filled with 200 mL of water; v=0.5L.

EXAMPLE CALCULATION:n = (5 atm)(0.5 L)/[(0.08205 atm-L/mol-K)(280 K)]

n = 0.1088 mol CO2

(0.1088 mol CO2)(1 mol NaHCO3/1 mol CO2)(0.845 g NaHCO3/1 mol NaHCO3)=9.139 g NaHCO3

(0.1088 mol CO2)(1 mol C6H8O7/3 mol CO2)(0.136 g C6H8O7/1 mol C6H8O7)=4.930 g C6H8O7

These calculations show how much of each reactant should be used in order to obtain enough pressure to PROPEL the car.

Car Design

• The design is very simple, optimizing weight.• Only 4 wheels, axels, middle support, and the

bottle, held on by low weight hair ties.

Testing Results

Trial Sodium Bicarbonate (g) Citric Acid (g) Water (mL) Distance (ft)

1 12.033 8.951 200 0

2 12.081 8.894 200 0

3 13.576 8.741 100 14

4 11.402 8.771 75 0

5 11.465 9.183 75 0

6 14.112 9.525 100 25

7 14.466 9.740 100 3

8 14.448 9.879 100 35

9 14.493 9.452 100 42

10 14.201 9.260 80 5

Trials 8, 9, and 10 are the official testing trials. Trials 1 through 7 were done without instructor supervision

Conclusions

• Performance:– Distance varied a lot.

• Mostly due to changes in the way the reactants were added together and amount of water used.

– The amount of reactants used was not conjoint with the calculations for 5 atm.

• We did not wait long enough for all of the reactants to be used because the bottle was leaking.

• Some of the reactant amounts that were used were calculated using the total volume of the bottle, not considering the volume of water.

Redesign:– Would use the same simple and lightweight design.– Maintain consistency of amount of reactants used.– Use a container that didn’t leak under pressure as easily.– Wait for the reactants to fully react before releasing pressure.