RCM Applied to Achieve Best Life Cycle
description
Transcript of RCM Applied to Achieve Best Life Cycle
Research Institute
Dr Bill Wessels PE CRE Principal Research Scientist
Reliability & Failure Analysis Laboratory http://rfal.uah.edu
Reliability Centered Maintenance Applied to Achieve Best Life Cycle Costs
Research Institute
Dr Bill Wessels PE CRE Experience:
• 1975 – 1989 Tramp Engineer, mining mobile machinery & process equipment life-cycle sustainability
• 1989 – 2005 Contractor [Biomedical Devices, DoD and NASA] design-for- reliability, RCM
• 2005 – Research in design-for- reliability & life-cycle sustainability for mechanical and structural components
Credentials • BS USMA, West Point ’70 • PhD Reliability Systems Engineering, UAHuntsville ’96 • PE MechE, Pennsylvania, ‘82 • CRE, ASQ, ’96
Author – Practical Reliability engineering and Analysis for System Design and Life-Cycle Sustainment, CRC Press, 2010
SRE RAMS 2013 2
Research Institute
Introduction
Reliability-centered maintenance serves to preserve system functionality by performing scheduled maintenance actions that prevent unscheduled system downing events during scheduled operations
RCM achieves its objective by developing an understanding of critical part failure
Understanding part failure is manifested by the ability to measure the consumed life of a critical part
Scheduled maintenance is defined by application of a risk threshold to the consumed life
SRE RAMS 2013 3
Research Institute
RCM Roadmap
SRE RAMS 2013 4
Part Cost Objective Function· Labor Costs· Materials Costs· Overhead Costs
Logistics Downtime
Math Model
Spare Strategy
Math Model
PreventiveMaintenance Math Model
Resource Queuing
Math Model
PartReliability/Cost
Simulation
Assembly Reliability/Cost
Simulation
System Reliability/Cost
Simulation
PartFailure
Math Model
PartRepair
Math Model
Part ReliabilityLife-Cycle Affordability
Assembly ReliabilityLife-Cycle Affordability
System ReliabilityLife-Cycle Affordability
Condition Indicator
Time-to-Failure Reliability Failure
Math Model
CBM
TDM
SDMStress-Based
Reliability Failure Math Model
Single Fail MechSingle Fail Mode
f(t)
Y
E
S
Y
E
S
YES
NO
PartFailure Mode
Multiple Fail MechMultiple Fail Mode
f(s)
NO
Metric: Part Condition Indicator
Metric: Part Time in Service
Metric: Part Stress Profile
RCMDatabase
System
Subsystem
Critical Items List
Assembly
Part
ORFunctional
Failure
PartPart
RCMDatabase
Part Failure Consequences
Analysis
Perception of Part Failure
P-F Interval
Operator
Maintainer
Criticality A
nalysis
ORFailureMechanisms
FailureModes
PhysicalStress
ThermalStress
EnvironmetalStress
Change in Shape
(Strain)
Change in Geometry(Crack)
Change inMaterial Property
(Corrosion)
OR
Critical Items List
RCMDatabase
Part
FailureMechanisms
Sources
Transportation Storage Function
Operational Ambient
OR
OR
PartFailure Effects
Research Institute
Part Reliability- Maintainability Cycle
SRE RAMS 2013 5
Research Institute
System Downtime
SRE RAMS 2013 6
Research Institute
Source of RCM Cost Benefit
SRE RAMS 2013 7
Part failsSystem down
Maintenance action initiated
Wor
k S
tart
s
Time
Time-to-Repair
post-Repair Logistics Downtime
pre-Repair Logistics Downtime
$Lost Opportunity
$Labor$Overhead
$Labor$Materials$Overhead
Wor
kRe
sum
es
$Labor$Overhead
$Benefit
Part failsSystem down
Maintenance action initiated
Wor
k S
tart
s
Wor
kRe
sum
es
$Labor$Overhead
$Labor$Materials$Overhead
Time
Time-to-Repair
post-Repair Logistics Downtime
pre-Repair Logistics Downtime
$Lost Opportunity
Total Downtime
$Labor$Overhead
Research Institute
Top Level RCM Path Develop a rank ordered critical items list – CIL Perform reliability failure analysis to identify:
• Sources of failure mechanisms (Conditions of use) • Failure mechanisms action on the critical part (Cause of
part failure) • Failure modes (Damage to part) • Failure effects – part (Symptoms of the damage) • Failure effects – assembly (Consequences of part
failure)
Select appropriate RCM Path • CBM • TDM • SDM
SRE RAMS 2013 8
Research Institute
Condition-Based Maintenance CBM
Consumed life characterized by a condition that defines the failure mode/damage • Change in shape • Change in geometry • Change in material properties
Method for investigating the damage, NDI • Visual inspection of condition indicator • Manual measurement of condition indicator • Sensor measurement of condition indicator
Metrics that characterize the damage Risk Threshold
SRE RAMS 2013 9
Research Institute
Notional Linear CBM Concept
SRE RAMS 2013 10
Research Institute
Notional CBM Concept
SRE RAMS 2013 11
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 12
Research Institute
Decreasing Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 13
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 14
Research Institute
Diverging Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 15
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 16
Research Institute
Diverging Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 17
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 18
Research Institute
Converging Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 19
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 20
Research Institute
Converging Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 21
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 22
Research Institute
Fatigue Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 23
Research Institute
Fatigue Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 24
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 25
Research Institute
Step Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 26
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 27
Research Institute
Step Condition Indicator
SRE RAMS 2013 28
Research Institute SRE RAMS 2013 29
Research Institute
Notional Attribute CBM Concept
SRE RAMS 2013 30
Research Institute
Time Directed Maintenance, TDM
Consumed life characterized by time in service, but…
Single failure mechanism with single failure mode
Failure mode correlated to operating time
SRE RAMS 2013 31
Research Institute
Time-to-Failure Data
SRE RAMS 2013 32
Research Institute
Time-to-Failure Histogram
SRE RAMS 2013 33
Research Institute
Fit Data to 3-Parameter Weibull Median Ranks Regression
First: Fit the 2-Parameter Weibull
Then: Select a value for the location parameter, g
• Choose the mid-time between 0 and Tmin
• Calculate Xg = Xi – g
• Calculate r2 for Xg & Y
If: r2 for Xg < r2 for the 2-Parameter Weibull, use the 2-Parameter Weibull
If: r2 for Xg > r2 for the 2-Parameter Weibull,
fit the 3-Parameter Weibull
SRE RAMS 2013 34
Research Institute
Fit Data to 2-Parameter Weibull Median Ranks Regression
SRE RAMS 2013 35
Research Institute
2-P Weibull Median Ranks Regression
SRE RAMS 2013 36
Research Institute
2-P Weibull Median Ranks Regression
SRE RAMS 2013 37
Research Institute
TTF Location Parameter, g
SRE RAMS 2013 38
Research Institute
TTF Location Parameter, g
SRE RAMS 2013 39
Research Institute
3-P Weibull Failure Math Model - TTF
SRE RAMS 2013 40
Research Institute
3-P Weibull Failure Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 41
Research Institute
Failure Math Model pdf – f(t)
SRE RAMS 2013 42
Research Institute
Risk Threshold & Hazard Function
SRE RAMS 2013 43
Research Institute
Risk Threshold Logic
SRE RAMS 2013 44
Research Institute
Part Alternatives Hazard Functions & Risk Threshold
SRE RAMS 2013 45
Research Institute
Parts Alternatives Risk-based Scheduled Maintenance Interval, SMI
SRE RAMS 2013 46
Research Institute
Exponential v Weibull Failure Math Models
SRE RAMS 2013 47
Research Institute
Exponential v Weibull Hazard Function w/Risk Threshold
SRE RAMS 2013 48
Research Institute
Time-to-Repair Data
SRE RAMS 2013 49
Research Institute
Time-to-Repair Histogram
SRE RAMS 2013 50
Research Institute
3-P Weibull Failure Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 51
Research Institute
Repair Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 52
Research Institute
LDT Math Model - Baseline
SRE RAMS 2013 53
Research Institute
pre-Repair LDT Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 54
Baseline
Research Institute
post-Repair LDT Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 55
Baseline
Research Institute
pre-Repair LDT Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 56
Research Institute
post-Repair LDT Math Model
SRE RAMS 2013 57
Research Institute
Deterministic Reliability, Maintainability & Availability
SRE RAMS 2013 58
Research Institute
Reliability Simulation Inputs
SRE RAMS 2013 59
Research Institute
Baseline Maintenance Labor Inputs
SRE RAMS 2013 60
Research Institute
PM Maintenance Labor Inputs
SRE RAMS 2013 61
Research Institute
Maintenance Costs Inputs
SRE RAMS 2013 62
Research Institute
Part Life-Cycle Simulation Factors
SRE RAMS 2013 63
Research Institute
Baseline Reliability Simulation Report
SRE RAMS 2013 64
Simulation Report for Part 1 Baseline
Results from 259 runs of sim time 40000-hrs
Part 1 Minimum Mean Maximum St.Dev 95% CL SEM 95% CL
Availability 0.98984 0.99051 0.99137 0.00030 0.99002 0.00002 0.99048
MTBF 628.51 683.68 734.35 19.74 651.09 1.23 681.65
MDT 6.32 6.54 6.80 0.08 6.68 0.005 6.55
MMT 1.67 1.76 1.88 0.03 1.81 0.002 1.76
LDT 4.79 4.86 4.79
System Failures 54 58.00 63 1.66 0.10 58.17
Research Institute
PM Reliability Simulation Report
SRE RAMS 2013 65
Simulation Report for Part 1 - PM
Results from 259 runs of sim time 40000-hrs
Part 1 Minimum Mean Maximum St.Dev 95% CL SEM 95% CL
Availability 0.99305 0.99328 0.99342 0.00006 0.99318 0.000004 0.99328
MTBF 467.32 467.43 467.49 0.03 467.38 0.00 467.42
MDT 3.10 3.16 3.27 0.03 3.73 0.00 3.16
MMT 0.75 1.71 2.38 0.04 1.78 0.00 1.71
LDT 0.83 1.40 2.19 1.95 1.45
System Failures 85 85 85
Research Institute
Reliability Simulation Summary
SRE RAMS 2013 66
Research Institute
Labor, Materials, Overhead & Lost Opportunity Costs Table
SRE RAMS 2013 67
Research Institute
Engineering Economics Basics
SRE RAMS 2013 68
,
0
, ,
1 1
1
n
i t
t
t
i t i t t
NPV PV
iPV A
i i
1
1 1
n
eqv n
i iA NPV
i
Research Institute
Economic Analysis Expensed Costs &
Lost Opportunity Costs
SRE RAMS 2013 69
Research Institute
Part Uniform Recurring Equivalent Cost
SRE RAMS 2013 70
DetMean Det95%CL BSimMean BSim95%CL PMSimMean PMSim95%CL
A(CICC+Event) -$335 -$490 -$332 -$348 -$425 -$432
A(CExp+LostOp) -$2,118 -$3,816 -$2,090 -$2,239 -$1,452 -$1,747
Research Institute
Part Operational Availability
SRE RAMS 2013 71
Baseline RCM
Part AO 0.99051 0.99328
Research Institute
Stress-Directed Maintenance, SDM
Consumed life characterized by applied stress profile
Measures failure mechanisms acting on part
Not well developed for use by practioner
SRE RAMS 2013 72
Research Institute
SDM - The Present – Static Loading
SRE RAMS 2013 73
sop sdesign g
f (s) 1
f e
s
s s
s
95%LCLStrength
h(x)
x
1
( )x
h x
g
r
xr
Research Institute
SDM - The Future - Wearout
SRE RAMS 2013 74
Research Institute
Summary
RCM yields definition of scheduled maintenance interval for critical parts
RCM measures part consumed life constrined by a risk threshold
RCM metrics: • CBM – Condition indicator
• TDM – Time in service
• SDM – Stress load profile
SRE RAMS 2013 75