Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History...

31
© 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6 th Annual Wyoming CO2 Conference Casper, WY July 12, 2012

Transcript of Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History...

Page 1: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Weber Sand Unit

Case History (RWSU)

Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer

Chevron North America E&P

6th Annual Wyoming CO2 Conference

Casper, WY July 12, 2012

Page 2: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Outline

Location

Geology

Field Development History

CO2 Project Development

Recent Efforts

Lessons Learned / Summary

2

Page 3: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Field Location

3

Wyoming

Utah Colorado

Rangely

Field

Page 4: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Statistics

(as of October 2011)

October 2011 monthly numbers

Oil Production 11,660 B/D

NGL Production 1,247 B/D

Water Production 229,420 B/D

Gas Production 157 MMCF/D*

CO2 Purchases 31 MMCF/D

*All produced gas is re-injected.

4

Cumulative as of October 2011

Oil Production 887 MMB

NGL Production 11.8 MMB

Water Production 4.5 BB

CO2 Purchase 540 BCF

Gas Production (since CO2) 1.1TCF

CO2 Injection 1.6 TCF

Page 5: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Well Data (October, 2011)

5

Average Elevation 5300 FT

Average Perf Depth 6000 FT

Active Producers 372

189 Electric Submersible Pumps

69 Flowing Wells

90 Rod Pumps

Active Injectors 267

Total Wells* 947

*including P&A and SI

Page 6: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU - Geology

Page 7: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Reservoir Properties

7

Producing Horizon Weber

Lithology Aeolian SS w/fluvial stringers

Unit Area 19,153 Acres

Average Gross Thickness 526 FT

Average Effective Thickness 189 FT

Average Effective Porosity 12%

Average Effective Perm. 8 md

Average Initial Swi 35.8%

Reservoir Temperature 160 deg. F

Initial Reservoir Pressure 2750 psi

Fractures Some faulting & natural fractures

Page 8: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Field Top Weber Structural

Contour Map

Top Weber Ss structure map of the Rangely Field (Mendeck,1986)

-1150ft MSL

-330ft MSL

A CI = 50’

A

Page 9: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Type Log

9

Page 10: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Weber Sand Unit

10

ZONE 1

Page 11: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU- Field Development History

Page 12: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Weber Sand Unit Development

History

12

1933 Weber Sand Discovery

1944 40 Acre Development

1950-69 HC Gas Injection

1957 Unitization

1958-83 Waterflood Expansions

1963-85 20 Acre Infill, WF Align

1983-present 10 Acre Pilots

1986- CO2 Flood (tertiary)

2000-2011 Renewed Expansions and

Targeted Infill Drilling

1,000

10,000

100,000

1,000,000

1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

BP

D O

R M

CF

PD

BOPD BWPD MCFPD BWIPD CO2IPD MCFIPD

Page 13: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU Oil Production History

13

10,000

100,000

1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

BO

PD

Peripheral

Waterflood

Transition to

interior

patterns.

Infill Drilling

Production trend lines

_________________

Start CO2

injection.

Start of

“recent"

expansions.

End of

original areal

expansions.

Effect of

additional

expansions and

infill drilling near

unit boundaries.

Page 14: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU – CO2 Project Development

Page 15: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Rangely Weber Sand Unit

WYOMING

COLORADO

Rangely

Rock Springs

Shute Creek

Raven Ridge Pipeline

UTAH N

Page 16: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Initial CO2 Project Design

1:1 WAG Ratio.

Alternating volumes 1.5% HCPV CO2 and Water.

Inject 30% HCPV CO2 slug.

Follow CO2 with one HCPV water.

106 MMSTB Incremental oil production.

6.7% Incremental oil recovery.

Page 17: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

CO2 Project Milestones

CO2 project /construction begins. 1985

Raven Ridge Pipeline completed. 1985

CO2 injection starts. Oct 1986

Recycle compression and NGL construction. 1987-91

Expansions within original construction area. 1989

Expansion to far east. 1992

Focus on WAG Management, CO2 highgrading

and conformance improvement with some small expansions.

1993-2000

Expansions to the NW and north. 2000-2011

Page 18: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Project Expansion Over Time

18

Expanded out radially from the

original CO2 injection (pink) area.

Page 19: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU CO2 Flood Performance

19

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

BO

PD

RWSU CO2 Flood Performance

Total Oil Incremental Oil Waterflood Oil

Page 20: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Major Facilities and Upgrades

Recycle compression.

NGL Recovery.

Additional water injection plant.

Collection station re-builds.

New gas distribution system.

New gas gathering system.

Large-scale replacement of production flowlines.

Low-pressure gas gathering system.

20

Page 21: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU – Focus Efforts

Page 22: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Focus areas

CO2 Expansions

• Expansions have occurred primarily to the west and north areas of the unit.

• There has been significant success.

Infill Drilling

• 20-acre infills to the north and west.

• 10-acre infill pilot.

Base Production

22

Page 23: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU CO2 Expansions

Expansions have occurred

primarily to the west and north

areas of the unit.

These projects contributed

approximately 2500 bopd in

2011.

Cumulative recovery from

projects is approximately

3.35MMBO through 2011.

There has been significant

success.

23

Page 24: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Infill Drilling

2 focus areas:

• 20-acre infills to the north and

west.

• 10-acre infill pilot.

24

Page 25: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

RWSU Project Contribution

25

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

BO

PD

Total Actual Prod

8.5% Exponential Decline

CO2 expansions and Infills

have significantly added to

daily production and ultimate

recovery.

Page 26: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Other Projects and Opportunities

Sweep Improvement

• Re-alignment

3 successful pilots.

Larger study area being implemented now in the middle of the field.

• Vertical Conformance

Large opportunity – but most challenging to implement due to poor wellbore

condition.

Considering a possible foam CO2 trial.

10-acre Infill Pilot

2 new pilot wells drilled in 2010 are under observation.

Page 27: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Project Evolution Summary

Initial Design Actual

WAG Ratio 1:1 Tapered

Half Cycle Slug Size 1.5% HCPV Varies

Ultimate HCPV Slug Size 30% 46%

Compression Capacity 120 MMCFD 165 MMCFD

Peak CO2 Purchase Rate 200 MMCFD 150 MMCFD

Ultimate CO2 Purchase 670 BCF 540 BCF +

NGL Recovery NO YES

Page 28: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Tertiary Recovery Project Statistics

(October 2011)

Tertiary Incremental Oil Rate (Oil + NGL) 9,170 STB/D

Incremental Cumulative Oil (Oil + NGL) 87 MMSTB (4.8%)

Cum Solvent Purchased 540 BSCF

Cum Solvent Recycled 990 BSCF

Cum Solvent Injected 1,604 BSCF or 46%

HCPVSI

Cum Gas Produced to Injected Ratio 69 %

Cum CO2 Utilization - Gross 14.6 MSCF/STB

Cum CO2 Utilization - Net 4.9 MSCF/STB

Average Field WAG Ratio 2.5

Page 29: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Summary

1) The Rangely Weber Sand Unit CO2 flood has been an

economically successful project.

2) Flood implementation has changed dramatically over time in

response to economic factors and operational decisions.

3) Technical innovation and flexibility has been critical to field

development over time.

4) Recent projects in previously under-developed area of field are

adding significant production and field life.

5) Long history of producing our resources with positive impact to

the community and minimal impact to the environment.

Page 30: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Lessons Learned

CO2 flooding is a complicated process and you will be surprised at

times. Be ready to make changes.

Work closely with operations personnel to identify trends quickly.

WAG tapering and reduced half-cycles have proven to be an

effective way to control gas production.

Reduced half cycles can help from both an operational and sweep

standpoint.

Facility capacity design is challenging. Plan expansion capability

into the design.

30

Page 31: Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) · © 2012 Chevron Rangely Weber Sand Unit Case History (RWSU) Rory Clark – Reservoir Engineer Chevron North America E&P 6th Annual Wyoming

© 2012 Chevron

Thank You

31