Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

93
@Randfish Fight Back Against Back RAND FISHKIN #theinbound er Ponencia en inglés - Ponte los

Transcript of Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Page 1: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

@Randfish

Fight Back Against Back

RAND FISHKIN

#theinbounder Ponencia en inglés - Ponte los

Page 2: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected]

Why the back button has become web marketing’s greatest enemy

(and how to defeat it)

Page 3: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Slides online atbit.ly/backenemy

Page 4: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Let’s Go Back to 2012…

Page 5: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Keywords, content, links, and a crawlable site could get you here… And keep you there.

Page 6: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Even if the experience users had wasn’t superb, so long as you could outearn your competitors’ links, you were likely to stay on

top

Page 7: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

On Facebook, the likes and shares determined how often you’d be in

the news feed of your fans.

Page 8: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

On Twitter, visibility was entirely determined by publication time.

Page 9: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

In 2012, we only had to worry about the path to conversion and CRO on our own sites.

Page 10: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

We could let audiences self-select out of these

phases after an initial visit without fear of repercussions

Page 11: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

If putting a price here meant 80% of visitors left, no problem. So long as the more qualified ones (those we really wanted)

stayed, we were doing our jobs.

Page 12: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

What Happened that Made 2016 so Different?

Page 13: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google Moved to Learning Algorithms

Page 14: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Early On, Google Rejected Machine Learning in the Organic Ranking Algo

Via Datawocky, 2008

Page 16: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

In 2012, Google Published a Paper About How they Use ML to Predict Ad CTRs:

Via Google

Page 17: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Susan Wojcicki, Google SVP, at All Things Digital, 2012

“Our SmartASS system is a machine learning system. It learns whether our users are interested in that ad, and whether users are going to click on them.”

Page 18: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

By 2013, It Was Something Google’s Search Folks Talked About Publicly

Via SELand

Page 19: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

In October of 2015, they finally revealed RankBrain, an AI-system input to the search rankings

Via Bloomberg Business

Page 20: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

As ML Takes Over More of Google’s Algo, the Underpinnings of the Rankings Change

Via Colossal

Page 21: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google is Public About How They Use ML in Image Recognition & Classification

Potential ID Factors

(e.g. color, shapes, gradients, perspective,

interlacing, alt tags, surrounding text, etc)

Training Data(i.e. human-labeled images)

Learning Process

Best Match Algo

Page 22: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google is Public About How They Use ML in Image Recognition & Classification

Via Jeff Dean’s Slides on Deep Learning; a Must Read for SEOs

Page 23: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Machine Learning in Search Could Work Like This:

Potential Ranking Factors

(e.g. PageRank, TF*IDF,Topic Modeling, QDF, Clicks,

Entity Association, etc.)

Training Data(i.e. good & bad search

results)

Learning Process

Best Fit Algo

Page 24: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Training Data(e.g. good search results)

This is a good SERP – searchers rarely bounce, rarely short-click, and rarely need to enter other queries or go to page 2.

Page 25: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Training Data(e.g. bad search results!)

This is a bad SERP – searchers bounce often, click other results, rarely long-click, and try other queries. They’re definitely not happy.

Page 26: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

The Machines Learn to Emulate the Good Results & Try to Fix or Tweak the Bad Results

Potential Ranking Factors

(e.g. PageRank, TF*IDF,Topic Modeling, QDF, Clicks,

Entity Association, etc.)

Training Data(i.e. good & bad search

results)

Learning Process

Best Fit Algo

Page 27: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Deep Learning is Even More Advanced:

Dean says by using deep learning, they don’t have to

tell the system what a cat is, the machines learn, unsupervised, for

themselves…

Page 28: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

We’re Talking About Algorithms that Build Algorithms(without human intervention)

Page 29: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Googlers Don’t Feed in Ranking Factors… The Machines Determine Those Themselves.

Potential Ranking Factors

(e.g. PageRank, TF*IDF,Topic Modeling, QDF, Clicks,

Entity Association, etc.)

Training Data(i.e. good search results)

Learning Process

Best Fit Algo

Page 30: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Last October, Google Finally Went Public with Their Use of ML-Based RankBrain

Via Bloomberg Business

Page 32: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google Leverages the Outputs from RankBrain Despite Not Knowing for Sure What It Uses:

Via SERoundtable

Page 33: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google’s AI Just Keeps Growing in Power…

Via The Verge

Page 35: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

But Google Isn’t Alone

Page 36: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Facebook’s VisibilityAlgorithms

Page 37: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Via Slate

Machine learning based on engagement determines

what appears in our Facebook News Feeds

Page 38: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Twitter’s Emerging Visibility Plan

Page 39: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Twitter’s new home screen will work the

same way – highlighting the “most important” (aka “most engaged-with”) tweets from accounts you follow

Via Mashable

Page 40: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Instagram’s New Algorithmic Feed

Page 41: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Instagram announced the

change March 15th saying they will

“take their time to get this right.”

Via Mashable

Page 42: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Engagement is Becoming the Web’s Universal

Quality Metric

Page 43: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google Suggest

The order of suggestions is based on engagement w/

those queries

Page 44: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Chrome Autocomplete

Ordered by what I (and others) have engaged with most that contain

these letters

Page 45: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Google Maps & Local Results

Search volume, driving directions, and SERP engagement are all

elements of local rankings

Page 46: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Social Networks’ “Trending” Content

Page 47: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Suggested Accounts to Follow

Page 48: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

What’s “Important” in Gmail

If lots of folks ignore, delete, or report spam on your emails, you won’t get this label anymore

Page 49: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Sites & Brands Earn an Engagement Reputation that Determines Visibility

Page 50: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Quantity of Posts/Emails/ Pieces of Content/ Rankings/etc

Quantity of clicks/likes/shares/reactions/etc

EngagementReputation=

Page 51: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Every Time a Visitor Clicks that Back Button, It Saps Away at our Reputation

Page 52: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

How Do We Fight Back Against Back?

Page 53: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Understand & Serve All of Your Visitors’ Intents#1

Page 54: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Don’t Just Ask “Who is My Customer?”

Via Moz

Page 55: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Ask “What Are All the Needs of These Searchers?” Then Serve As Many as Possible

You might be trying to sell desks, but searchers are seeking answers to all of these and more.

Page 56: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

If the Competition Delivers Value to Searchers Who Aren’t Buyers, But You Don’t…

Page 57: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

They’re Likely to Win the Engagement Battle

Via JustStand.org

Page 58: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Outearn Your Ranking’s Avg. Clickthrough Rate#2

Page 59: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Optimize the Title, Meta Description, & URLa Little for Keywords, but a Lot for Clicks

If you rank #3, but have a higher-than-average CTR for that position,

you might get moved up.

Via Philip Petrescu on Moz

Page 60: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Every Element Counts Does the title match

what searchers want?Does the URL seem

compelling?

Do searchers recognize & want to click your domain?

Is your result fresh? Do searchers want a

newer result?

Does the description create curiosity &

entice a click?

Do you get the brand dropdown?

Page 61: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Given Google Often Tests New Results Briefly on Page One…

It May Be Worth Repeated Publication on a Topic to Earn that High CTR

Shoot! My post only made it to #15… Perhaps I’ll try again in a few months.

Page 62: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Driving Up CTR Through Branding Or Branded Searches May Give An Extra Boost

Page 63: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

#1 Ad Spender

#2 Ad Spender

#4 Ad Spender

#3 Ad Spender

#5 Ad Spender

Page 64: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

With Google Trends’ new, more accurate, more customizable ranges, you can actually watch the effects of events and ads on search query volume

Fitbit was running ads on Sunday NFL games that clearly show in

the search trends data.

Page 65: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Optimize Signal:Noise Ratio on Every Channel#3

Page 66: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Content > More Content

A lot of SEO used to be about establishing authority through brute quantity, but Panda,

and now Rankbrain, are changing that.

Page 67: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Social Shares > More Social Shares

Via Rand’s Facebook Page

When I have a successful post on Facebook, it boosts

Facebook’s likelihood to show my posts in the

future…

Page 68: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Social Shares > More Social Shares

High engagement grows my reach potential.

Low engagement shrinks my reach potential.

Page 69: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Emails > More Emails

Via Pinpointe.com

Page 70: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Emails > More Emails

Via CrazyEgg.com

Page 71: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Better Rankings >More RankingsA brand that consistently gets on page 1

but isn’t holding searchers’ interest or develops a negative brand reputation in SERPs may find those page 1 rankings

are hurting their ability to get #1 rankings!

Page 72: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Put User Experience First in Your Marketing#4

Page 73: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Speed, speed, and more speed

Delivers an easy, enjoyable experience on every device

Compels visitors to engage, share, & return

Avoids features that dissuade or annoy visitors

Authoritative, comprehensive content that’s uniquely valuable vs. what anyone else in your space provides

The Marketer’s User Experience Checklist

Page 74: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Uniquely Valuable Content

Via R2D3

Lots of articles try to explain machine learning, but this one SHOWS how it works in a way anyone can

grasp.

Page 76: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Easy, Enjoyable Experience on Every Device

Via CNN

Page 77: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Via CNN

Easy, Enjoyable Experience on Every Device

Page 78: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Engagement, Sharing, & Repeat Visits

Via Meshable.io

Page 79: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Nothing That Dissuades Or

Annoys Visitors

Ads, more ads, distractions, and no salary numbers? It’s a

miracle they rank at all.

Page 80: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

This might convert more visitors to email subscribers, but it might also convert many more visitors to back-button-clickers

Page 81: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Cyrus May Have Gone a Little Overboard…

Via Cyrus on Twitter

Page 82: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Craft Compelling CTAs at the Top of the Funnel#5

Page 83: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Top-of-Funnel Content Can’t Be Used Solely to Filter Out the Non-Customers

Trying to rank w/ content that only serves one niche of your search audience

may be a recipe for failure

Page 84: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Fighting Against Back Means Serving a Broader Audience

AngelList’s tool makes salary comparison

easy, fast, and serves a huge range of roles,

locations, and markets

Via AngelList

Page 85: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Or, Getting More Precise with Your Search Query -> Content Targeting

By targeting a less competitive, lower volume query, Compass can reach

the audience they’re seeking

Page 86: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Either Way, Engagement Metrics on Content Must Become KPIs

Improving Pages/Session and lowering Bounce Rate should probably play a “link-building-like” role in your SEO arsenal

Page 87: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Our Content CTAs Deserve to Be Customized, Tested, & Refined

(just like conversion-focused landing pages)e.g. I bet I could make a

better CTA for the comparison tool than

this (which looks far too much like an ad IMO)

Via Talkpay (Comparably’s Blog)

Page 88: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Welcome to 2016: A World of Engagement-Based Reputation

Page 89: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

The Machines Are Judging Us…

Page 90: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Let’s Show ‘EmWhat We Got.

Page 91: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Fight Back Against Back.

Page 92: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected]

Bit.ly/backenemy

Page 93: Rand Fishkin en The Inbounder

GRACIASTHANK YOU

#theinbounder

@Randfish 

RAND FISHKIN