Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka,€¦ · Web viewRajiv Gandhi University of...
Transcript of Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka,€¦ · Web viewRajiv Gandhi University of...
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka,
Bangalore.
ANNEXURE-II
PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION
1 Name of the Candidate
& Address
DHARITRI RAJBANGSHIC/O MR. BINOD KR. RAJBANGSHIBILI BHAWAN, PANDAV NAGARHOUSE #2, LANE #4GUWAHATI-780012ASSAM
2 Name of the Institution DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, BANGALORE
3 Course of study and subject MASTER OF PHYSIOTHERAPY (Physiotherapy in Musculoskeletal disorders & Sports physiotherapy)
4 Date of admission to course 15th June; 2012
5 TITLE OF THE TOPIC:
“COMBINED EFFECT OF ACTIVE RELEASE TECHNIQUE AND CAPSULAR STRETCH
IN TREATING PATIENTS WITH FROZEN SHOULDER”
6 Brief resume of the intended work:
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The shoulder is considered the most mobile joint in the human body.[1, 2] The synchronous motion of
the entire shoulder girdle working in concern with the spine provides tremendous mobility. Shoulder
rehabilitation specialists focus on restoring and maintaining normal range of motion at the shoulder
girdle.[3]
Adhesive capsulitis is characterised by insidious and progressive onset of pain and loss of active and
passive mobility of glenohumeral joint. The term adhesive capsulitis, periarthritis of shoulder are used
at times with a meaning synonymous with frozen shoulder. It was first described by Duplay in 1972
and named frozen shoulder by Codman in 1934[4] and thereafter Neviaser[5] noted that the pathology
of this condition was actually located in the capsule of the shoulder joint and therefore called it
‘adhesive capsulitis’. A stiff and painful shoulder is often casually labeled as a frozen shoulder. The
incidence of frozen shoulder has been estimated to be from 3-5% in general population with a
significant incidence amongst diabetics in order of 10-20%. It appears to be most common in adults
between the age group of 40-70yrs. Women are at a greater risk (4:1) and non-dominant arm is most
commonly affected. Idiopathic frozen shoulder is most commonly associated with diabetes mellitus.[6,7,8,9]
Adhesive capsulitis has been divided into two types:
i) Primary adhesive capsulitis which refers to idiopathic form of a painful and stiff shoulder.
ii) Secondary adhesive capsulitis indicated as a loss of motion resulting from many disposing
factors such as trauma, stroke, upper extremity fractures or surgery with mobilization [10,11]
Pain particularly in the first phase of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder, i.e. -freezing phase often
keeps patients from performing activities of daily living. In the second phase, i.e. -frozen phase there
are restrictions in active motion which limit the patient in personal care, ADL, or occupational
activities. In the third phase, i.e.-thawing phase there is slow increase in the mobility, which leads to
full or almost full recovery. The first phase lasts for 2 1/2 -9 months, second phase for 4-12 months and
third phase for 5-26 months.[12,13,14,15]
Various physiotherapy approaches have been suggested for shoulder musculoskeletal disorders,
including manual therapy, electrotherapy, acupuncture and exercise therapy.[16]
Active Release Techniques (ART) is a new and highly successful non-invasive hands-on technique, It
is a patented state of the art soft tissue system/movement based massage technique method to address
problems in the soft tissues of the body, including the muscles, tendons, ligaments, fascia, and nerves.
Active Release Techniques treatment is a collection of soft tissue techniques for examination,
diagnosis, and treatment of soft tissue disorders. [17]
It is designed to identify and treat scar tissue adhesions that are interfering with the normal function
of the body. It allows the therapist to:
Break-up restrictive adhesions,
Restore normal sliding of the muscles tendons and nerves
Active Release separates, releases, and stretches the connective tissue adhesions, restores vascular
and lymphic circulation, and increases your range of motion, flexibility, and strength. One of the best
things about ART is it achieves results very quickly , especially when combined with other
conventional physical therapy treatments. Although each case is unique, and there are several factors
that will determine the length of time it will require to fully resolve a condition, we usually find a
significant improvement can be gained in just 5 – 8 treatments.[17]
In frozen shoulder the joint capsule tends to be contracted, thickened and closely adherent to the
humeral head contributing to limitation of movement.[18] In frozen shoulder limitation of external
rotation with the arm in abduction typically is associated with an antero-inferior capsular restriction
whereas limited internal rotation and cross body adduction are associated with posterior capsular
restriction. The capsular pattern is designated by a hard end feel at the end limitation of all 3 passive
movements in fixed proportions. Therefore stretching for anterior, inferior, and posterior shoulder
should be performed.[19]
The current study will try to find out whether Active Release Technique with capsular stretch will
yield better results in patients with frozen shoulder, along with the conventional treatment of
therapeutic ultrasound.
6.2 Need for the study :
Adhesive capsulitis or frozen shoulder is a common cause of shoulder pain and disability in the
general population. Patients generally complain of an inability to sleep on the affected side. Although
it is a self-limiting ailment, its rather long, restrictive and painful course forces the affected person to
seek treatment.
Frozen shoulder presents mainly with 2 characteristics: pain and contracture. All gross ranges of
motions are greatly decreased, and pain is felt in all directions. This tends to be due to scar tissue
build up that occurs from non-use. Restricted glenohumeral elevation and external rotation, together
with unremarkable radiographic findings, are also observed[20].Conservative management remains the
mainstay treatment of adhesive capsulitis. This includes therapeutic modalities, mobilization,
exercise, soft tissue therapy, chiropractic manipulation of the shoulder, non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs, and steroid injections.
Active release technique is also one of the treatment options considered now a days by many health
practitioners for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Active release technique helps to break the
adhesions formed around the shoulder joint. It also releases and stretches the connective tissue around
the shoulder, restores vascular and lymphic circulation, and increases the range of motion. However,
none of the reviews have focused upon effect of Active release technique on Frozen shoulder. The
objective of this review is to evaluate the Effect of Active release technique on patients with frozen
shoulder or adhesive capsulitis.
Capsular stretching also causes significant reduction in pain and improvement in function in patients
with adhesive capsulitis.[21]
Many combination of treatments have been used in the past for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis
and they have been found to be effective.
But no studies have been done in the past to compare the combined effectiveness of Active release
technique along with capsular stretch in patients with Adhesive capsulitis and their effectiveness in
reducing pain, increasing joint mobility and functional activities.
6.3 Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis (H0): There will no significant difference in the results between Active release
technique and capsular stretch, and capsular stretch only in patients with frozen shoulder.
Experimental hypothesis (H1): There will be a significant difference in the results between Active
release technique and capsular stretch, and capsular stretch only in patients with frozen shoulder.
6.2 Review of Literature:
Outcome measures
Visual Analogue scale and goniometer
Boonstra,Anne M.;Schiphorst Preuper,Henrica R.;Reneman,Michiel F.(2008). Did a study to
determine the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with
chronic musculoskeletal pain and they concluded that reliability of the VAS for disability is moderate
to good and a strong correlation with the VAS for pain[22]
Mc Cormac HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. (1998). In their study of critical review of clinical
application of visual analogue scale stated that visual analogue scale is established as valid and
reliable in range of clinical and research application[23]
Dan L Riddle, Jules M Rothstein, Robert L. Lamb (1987). Conducted a study. The purpose of the
study was to examine the intratester and intertester reliabilities for clinical goniometric measurements
of shoulder passive range of motion (PROM) using two different sizes of universal goniometers. The
results of the study shows that Goniometric PROM measurements for the shoulder appear to be
highly reliable when taken by the same physical therapist, regardless of the size of the goniometer
used. The degree of intertester reliability for these measurements appears to be range of motion
specific.[24]
Frozen Shoulder
Wong P L K, Tan H C A (2010). In their study they stated that of all the joints in the human body,
the shoulder has the greatest range of motion. This allows complex movements and functions to be
carried out, and is of vital importance to the activities of daily living and work. Any restriction or pain
that involves the joint puts a huge amount of strain on patients, especially those who are in their most
productive years of life. Frozen shoulder, a frequently encountered disorder of the shoulder, has been
well recognized since the early 1900s. Although benign, it has great impact on the quality of life of
patients. This article aims to provide an overview of the nature and the widely accepted management
of this condition based on other studies.[25]
Martin J. Kelley, Phillip W. Mcclure, Brain G, Leggin (2009). They conducted this study to
present an overview of the classification, etiology, pathology, examination, and plan of care for
frozen shoulder.[26]
Dias R, Cutts. S. (2005). Frozen Shoulder is characterized by pain and loss of motion or stiffness in
the shoulder. It affects about 2% of the general population. Frozen Shoulder most commonly affects
patients between the ages of 40 and 60 years, with no clear predisposition based on sex, arm
dominance or occupaction.[27]
Watson. E, Sumaband D (2001). Frozen Shoulder Syndrome is a condition of uncertain etiology
characterized by a progressive loss of both active and passive shoulder motion. Clinical Syndromes
include pain, a limited range of motion, and muscle weakness from disuse. The natural history is
uncertain. So many authors suggest that it is a more chronic disorder causing long-term disability.[28]
Sean M. Griggs MD; Anthony MD (2000). Frozen Shoulder, medically referred to as Adhesive
Capsulitis, the connective tissue surrounding the gleno-humeral joint of the shoulder, becomes
inflamed and stiff, a grows together with abnormal bands of tissue, called adhesions, greatly
restricting motion and causing chronic pain.[29]
Carolyn T. Wadsworth (1986). In this study he concluded that the widespread use of the label
"frozen shoulder" as a diagnosis for any stiff and painful shoulder condition has led to its becoming a
rather meaningless, catchall term. In addition to confounding both the lay public and health care
professionals, this indiscriminate labeling may prevent a patient from receiving appropriate treatment.
In this article, he defined frozen shoulder and reviewed its pathologic and etiologic factors,
epidemiology, natural history, and diagnosis. He presented this information in correlation with an
examination process to assist physical therapists in identifying suspected cases of frozen shoulder. He
also presented the current options for treatment, including physical therapy management with
physical agents and exercise.[30]
Intervention:
Therapeutic Ultrasound
Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001). They performed a systematic review of randomized controlled
trials in which ultrasound was used to treat people in conditions like musculoskeletal injuries and soft
tissue lesions. Each trial was assigned to investigate the contributions of active and placebo
ultrasound to the patient’s outcome measured. Thirty-five randomized clinical trials were published.
10 of the 35 RCTS were judged to acceptable methods using criteria based on those developed by
Sackett et al. of these RCTS, the results of two trials suggested that therapeutic ultrasound is more
effective in treating some clinical problems than placebo ultrasound, and the results of 8 trial suggest
that it is not and concluded there is little evidence that active therapeutic ultrasound is more effective
than placebo ultrasound for treating people with pain /a range of musculoskeletal injuries/ or for
promoting soft tissue healing.[31]
Zancan A, Gialanella B, Luisa A, Della Marta ME, D'Alessandro G, Casale R (1993). The aim of
their study was the instrumental evaluation of ultrasonic therapy in patients with periarthiris of the
shoulder for their real effectiveness of the anti- inflammatory action of the ultrasound. Two groups of
subjects were studied, periarthritis versus normal patients. Results of their study demonstrate a real
influence of ultrasound therapy on periarthritis shoulder to improve the functional outcome.[32]
Hamer J, Kirk JA (1976). Conducted research on the effectiveness of ultrasound and ice on frozen
shoulder in a series of patients. Results showed that both of these methods can shorten the painful
stage of the condition and in conjunction with specific exercise hasten recovery of shoulder ROM.[33]
Active Release Technique:
Joel Hund (2009). This study provides an overview of literature in regards to common rotator cuff
disorders and how they affect shoulder range of motion. In his study he concluded that rotator cuff
disorders are one of the most common musculoskeletal conditions seen in populations over thirty
years old. Effective treatment of this region can be rendered from a conservative care perspective for
most patients. In this study he has mentioned that soft tissue treatment like Active release technique,
graston technique, can be performed on entire shoulder, neck and upper back to lengthen tissues,
break up adhesions or fibrous tissues that has formed as a result of impingement and lack of mobility.[34]
Andreo A. Spina;(2007). The study concluded that Active Release Techniques, or ART, is a soft
tissue treatment method that focuses on relieving tissue tension via the removal of fibrosis/adhesion
that develops in tissue that is overloaded with repetitive use. In this case of external coxa saltans, the
underlying cause of the condition was increased tissue tension leading to increased friction of the
proximal Iliotibial band (ITB) complex over the greater trochanter. Utilizing ART resulted in a
complete resolution of this athlete’s symptoms and may be a good treatment option for external coax
saltans.[35]
Guy Hains (2002). The purpose of this article is to review the most common etiologies of shoulder
pain, focusing on those conditions of a myofascial origin. In addition to a review of the literature, the
author draws upon his own clinical experience to describe a method to diagnose and manage, patients
with shoulder pain of myofascial origin using ischemic compression techniques. This hands-on
therapeutic approach conveys several benefits including: positive therapeutic outcomes; a favorable
safety profile and; it is minimally strenuous on the doctor and well tolerated by the patient. In this
study it has been stated that Active release technique is a new and a useful technique to treat
myofacial symptoms.[36]
Capsular Stretch:
M.A.Harrast, Anita G.Rao (2004). They have mentioned the use of a typical exercise program of
active and passive stretching with the goal of maintaining and regaining range of motion in frozen
shoulder. The basis of this program is four-quadrant stretching of shoulder joint capsule which
includes forward flexion, internal rotation, external rotation and cross-body adduction. These
exercises should be prescribed 4-5 times daily in the supine position in order to stabilize the scapula
and stretch the glenohumeral joint capsule. Stretching slightly past the point of pain is necessary to
make forward progression in range of motion. At the initiation of the exercise, application of heat can
be helpful to reduce pain and facilitate stretching. After stretching, ice application can help reduce
inflammation and irritation.[37]
James K. Mantone, Wayne Z. Burkhead Jr. & Joseph Noonan (2000). They have documented the
importance of stretching exercises for the anterior, posterior and inferior shoulder capsule as a part of
the motion programme to improve the joint range of motion in stiff shoulder.[38]
6.5 Objective of the study :
7
To find out the effectiveness of capsular stretch in reducing pain and increasing ROM in
frozen shoulder.
To find out the combined effectiveness of active release technique along with capsular stretch
in reducing pain and increasing ROM in frozen shoulder.
Materials and Methods:
7.1 Source of data :
Physiotherapy OPD clinic, Dayananda Sagar College of physiotherapy, Bangalore.
Sagar hospital, Jayanagar, Bangalore.
Sagar hospital, Banashankari, Bangalore.
7.2 Method of collection of data:
Population :- Subjects diagnosed with Frozen Shoulder
Setting :- Hospital & out–patient department
Sample design :- Convenience sampling
Sample size :- 50
Study design : - Experimental study with pre & post-test design.
Duration :- 6 months
7.3 Inclusion Criteria: Patient diagnosed with frozen shoulder.
Age group between 40-70 years.
Both males and females.
unilateral involvement.
Restriction of shoulder capsular movement and ROM.
Patient with mini mental score of, equal to or greater than 25
7.4 Exclusion Criteria: History of surgery on the particular shoulder.
Rotator cuff rupture.
Painful stiff shoulder after a serious trauma.
Fracture of the shoulder complex.
Presence of osteoarthritis, or signs of bony damage.
Inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis.
Tendon calcification.
Patients with diabetes mellitus.
Patients who have undergone previous physiotherapy treatment.
7.5 Materials used: Couch/treatment table
Therapeutic ultrasound
Ultrasound gel
Cotton
Towel
Paper and pen
Hot pack
Measuring tools: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Goniometer
7.6 Methodology
Intervention to be conducted on the participants:
Subjects who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into two Groups by
simple random sampling, Group A and Group B. Informed consent will be taken from each of the
subjects prior to participation. Instructions will be given to the subjects about techniques performed.
This will be followed by Subjective as well as Objective assessment of the involved shoulder for
tenderness, temperature, swelling, pain and its intensity in terms of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
In addition to this functional assessment based on ROM will be carried out using universal
goniometer.
A total of 50, Group A (n=25) and Group B (n=25). Group A will receive active release technique
and capsular stretch along with therapeutic ultrasound and Group B will receive capsular stretch and
therapeutic ultrasound.
Before & after intervention pain assessment will be taken by Visual Analogue scale (VAS) every day.
Functional assessment will be taken by using goniometer.
Testing procedure :
GROUP A:
Will receive Active release technique and capsular stretch along with conventional therapy
(therapeutic ultrasound)
Capsular stretch: Subjects will first be applied with hot pack for 10 minutes before starting
the capsular stretches [39, 40]. After hot pack treatment will be followed by capsular stretching
for the anterior, inferior and posterior capsules of the shoulder. To stretch the anterior capsule
the subject will be positioned either in side lying with the affected arm upwards or in high
sitting and the shoulder and arms will be brought backwards into extension and this stretch
will be maintained for a minimum of 30 seconds and maximum duration up to the point of
pain experienced by the patient. Posterior capsule stretching will be performed with the
subject in supine position and therapist will perform cross body adduction. Antero- inferior
capsule will be stretched with the subject in supine position. To stretch the antero inferior
capsule the affected arm will be taken towards the extreme of attainable elevation and counter
pressure will be maintained at the patient’s sternum to prevent spinal extension. Each stress is
gentle but firm and will not be released until pain rather than discomfort is experienced.
Patients will receive capsular stretching of 5 repetitions per set, 5 sets per session, 1 session
per day for 5 days till 3 weeks.[41]
Active release technique: Position of the patient will be supine lying. The therapist will first
passively slightly abduct the supine patients humerus and will place the flat of his/her thumb
on the coracobrachialis, following it just before the coracoid process. At this point, the
therapist will slide off the tendon medially onto the anterior capsule. A firm tension will be
maintained on the capsule as the humerus will be slowly abducted and externally rotated. If no
spasm is created, the patient will actively abduct and externally rotate the shoulder while the
therapist will maintain the tension. Frequency is Alternate days for 3 weeks. [42]
Therapeutic ultrasound: The skin surface to be treated should be inspected; inflammatory
skin conditions should be avoided, and the nature of the treatment explained to the patient.
The patient should be in a comfortable position so that the area to be treated is accessible and
supported. The couplant should be applied to the skin surface. The treatment head is placed on
the skin before the output is turned on. The treatment head is moved continuously over the
surface while even pressure is maintained in order to iron out the irregularities in the sonic
field the emitting surface must be kept parallel to the skin surface. The dosage of ultrasound
must be decided upon area, depth and nature of the lesion. Frequency of 1 MHz, Intensity of
1.0 W/cm2, continuous mode, 8 minutes treatment time is to be given [43].
GROUP B:
Will receive Capsular stretch and conventional therapy (therapeutic ultrasound)
Capsular stretch: Subjects will first be applied with hot pack for 10 minutes before starting
the capsular stretches [39, 40]. After hot pack treatment will be followed by capsular stretching
for the anterior, inferior and posterior capsules of the shoulder. To stretch the anterior capsule
the subject will be positioned either in side lying with the affected arm upwards or in high
sitting and the shoulder and arms will be brought backwards into extension and this stretch
will be maintained for a minimum of 30 seconds and maximum duration up to the point of
pain experienced by the patient. Posterior capsule stretching will be performed with the
subject in supine position and therapist will perform cross body adduction. Antero- inferior
capsule will be stretched with the subject in supine position. To stretch the antero inferior
capsule the affected arm will be taken towards the extreme of attainable elevation and counter
pressure will be maintained at the patient’s sternum to prevent spinal extension. Each stress is
gentle but firm and will not be released until pain rather than discomfort is experienced.
Patients will receive capsular stretching of 5 repetitions per set, 5 sets per session, 1 session
per day for 5 days till 3 weeks.[41]
Therapeutic ultrasound: The skin surface to be treated should be inspected; inflammatory
skin conditions should be avoided, and the nature of the treatment explained to the patient.
The patient should be in a comfortable position so that the area to be treated is accessible and
supported. The couplant should be applied to the skin surface. The treatment head is placed on
the skin before the output is turned on. The treatment head is moved continuously over the
surface while even pressure is maintained in order to iron out the irregularities in the sonic
field the emitting surface must be kept parallel to the skin surface. The dosage of ultrasound
must be decided upon area, depth and nature of the lesion. Frequency of 1 MHz, Intensity of
1.0 W/cm2, continuous mode, 8 minutes treatment time is to be given [43].
Outcome Measures :
Visual Analogue Scale
Goniometer
Statistics:
Statistical analysis will be performed by using SPSS software for windows (version 17) & probability value (p value) will be set as 0.05
Descriptive statistics will be used to find out mean, standard deviation for demographic & outcome variable.
Paired t-test will be used to find out homogenecity for baseline & demographic & ratio
outcome variable within the group.
Unpaired t-test will be used to find out homogenecity for baseline & demographic & ratio outcome variable between the group.
Wilcoxon Signed Rank test will be used to find out the significant difference for ordinal scale within the groups.
Mann-Whitney U test will be used to find out the significant difference for ordinal scales between the groups.
Microsoft word, excel will be used to generate graphs & tables, etc.
8 List of References:
1. Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Joint structure and Function. A comprehensive analysis.
Philadelphia: F.A.Davis, 1992 second edition, chapter 8, pp. 255-310.
2. Frankal VH, Nordin M. Basic biomechanics of the skeletal system. Philadelphia: Lea and
Febiger, 1980 second edition, pp. 153-161.
3. Donatelli R. physical therapy of the shoulder .New York: Churchill Livingstone,1997.
4. Codman E. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial
bursa. In: The shoulder. Boston: Thomas Todd;1934:216-24.
5. Neviaser J. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a study of the pathological findings in
periarthritis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg 1945;27:211-22.
6. Wiley AM,Arthoscopic appearance of frozen shoulder. Arthoscopy 1991;7:138-143.
7. Corrigan B, Maitland GD,Practical Orthopaedic Medicine London,United Kingdom:
Butterworths:1983.
8. Bertoft ES. Painful shoulder disorder from a physiotherapeutic view:a review of literature,
critical reviews in physical and rehabilitation medicine. 1991;11:229-277.
9. Bulgen DY,Binder AI,Hazleman BL, et al. Frozen shoulder:prospective clinical study with an
evaluation of three treatment regimes. Ann Rheu Dis 1984;43:353-360.
10. Mao CY,Jaw WC,Cheng HC. The Pathology of Frozen Shoulder.Journal of Bone and Joint
Surgery. 77:677-683.
11. Molie Beyer, Peter Bonetti. Frozen shoulder. Balliere’s clinical Rheumatology. 1989;3:551-
556.
12. Neviaser TJ. Intra-articular inflammatory diseaseof the shoulder. Instr Course Lect.
1989;38:199-204.
13. Neviaser TJ. Adhesive capsulitis. Orthop clin North Am. 1987;18:439-443
14. Bunker TD, Anthony PP. The pathology of frozen shoulder: a dupuytren like disease. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:677-683
15. Reeves B. The natural of the frozen shouldersyndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 1975;4:193-196
16. The Effectiveness of Manual therapy in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the
shoulder:a systematic review.Manual therapy (2009)463-474.
17. Warren I Hammer. Functional soft tissue Examination and treatment using manual
methods.2007 Third edition;713-728
18. J.H Cyriax and P.J Cyriax, Cyriax illustrated manual of orthopaedic medicine.1983, 2nd ed.
Butterworth and Heinneman.
19. Mark A. Harrast and Anita G Rao. The stiff shoulder Physical medicine and rehabilitation
clinics of North America 2004;15;557-573
20. Codman EA. The Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and other Lesions in or
about the Subacromial Bursa. Boston: Thomas Todd Co, 1934.
21. Umit Bingol, Lale Altan. Photomedicine and laser surgery: Low Power Laser Treatment for
shoulder pain. 2005 October;23(5):459-464.
22. Boonsrta Anne M,Schiphorst preuper HR,Reneman MF.Reliability and validity of the visual
analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.Int J Rehabil:l
Res.2008;31(2):165-9.
23. Mc Cormac HM,Horne DJ,Sheather S.Clinical applications of visual analogue scale:A critical
review;phycol med.1998;18(4):1007-19.
24. Dan L Riddle,Jules M Rothstein and Robert L Lamb.Goniometric reliability in a clinical
setting.1987;67(5):673.
25. Wong P L K, Tan H C A, A review on frozen shoulder, Singapore Medical journal 2010;
51(9):694
26. Martin J. Kelley, Phillip W. Mcclure, Brain G, Leggin, Frozen Shoulder: Evidence and a
Proposed Model Guiding Rehabilitation journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy
2009 february volume 39 number 2
27. Dias R, Cutts. S. frozen Shoulder BMJ, dec 2005;331(7530): 1453-1456
28. Watson. E, Sumaband D, shoulder problems-A Guide to common disorders, Modern medicine
of Ireland 2001,31.2.
29. Sean M. Griggs MD; Anthony MD; Idiopathathic Adhesive Capsulitis. The journal of Bone
and Joint Surgery 2000,82:1398.
30. Carolyn T. Wadsworth. Frozen Shoulder. PHYS THER. 1986; 66:1878-1883.
31. Robertson VJ, Baker KG. A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys
Therapy. 2001 July;Vol 81: Number 7 :1339 –1350.
32. Zancan A, Gialanella B, Luisa A, Della Marta ME, D'Alessandro G, Casale R,
Telethermographic effects and a comparative clinical assessment of the treatment of shoulder
periarthritis using ultrasound, 1993 Jan-Jul; 15(1-4) :55-8.
33. Hamer J, Krik JA. Physiotherapy and frozen shoulder: a comparative trial of ice and ultrasonic
therapy. N Z Med J.1976 March 24; 83(560):191-2
34. Joel Hund, Effects of Rotator Cuff Disorder on Shoulder ROM, 2009 February, page 10
35. Andreo A. Spina: External coxa saltans (snapping hip) treated with active release techniques:
a case report. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2007; 51(1)23-29
36. Guy Hains, Chiropractic management of shoulder pain and dysfunction of myofascial origin
using ischemic compression techniques, JACC 2002; 46(3):192-200
37. Mark A. Harrast & Anita G. Rao. The stiff shoulder. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
journal of North America 2004; 15:557-573.
38. James K. Mantone, Wayne Z. Burkhead Jr. & Joseph Noonan Jr.. Non operative treatment of
rotator cuff tears. Orthopaedic Clinics of North America 2000; 31:295-311.
39. Warren CG, Lehmann JF, Koblanski JN.Heat and stretch procedures: an evaluation using rat
tail tendon. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976 Mar;57(3): 122-6.
40. Sheila Kitchen, Sarah Bazin. Electrotherapy Evidence – Based Practise. 11 th Edition.
Elsevier:Churchill Livingstone; 2006. 211-230.
41. S. Brent Brotzman, Kevin E. Wilk; Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation; shoulder injuries,
2003 second edition, chapter 3; second edition.
42. Warren I Hammer. Functional soft tissue Examination and treatment using manual methods.
2007 Third edition;713-728
43. John Low and Ann Reed; Therapeutic Ultrasound and Laser Therapy Electrotherapy
Explained principles and practice; 1990 August, Second edition . pages 148- 329.
9 Signature of Candidate
10 Remarks of the Guide
11 Name and Designation of
11.1 Guide : Dr. Mathew Anand
11.2 Signature
11.3 Co-Guide : Dr. Sujoy Kumar
11.4 Signature
11.5Head of Department : Dr. Anil T. John
11.6Signature
12 12.1Remarks of the Chairman & Principal:
12.2Signature
DAYANANDA SAGAR COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
THE INSTITUTIONAL ETHICAL COMMITTEE
ETHICAL CLEARENCE CERTIFICATE
The Institutional Ethical Committee of Dayananda Sagar College of
Physiotherapy has reviewed the research proposal of Ms. DHARITRI
RAJBANGSHI, MPT student, Dayananda Sagar College of Physiotherapy,
Kumaraswamy layout, Bangalore –78, certificates that the research proposal is
ethically satisfactory.
Reference: Ethical guide lines for biomedical resource on human Council Of
Medical Research.
New Delhi- 2000
CHAIR PERSON SECRETARY
Basic medical scientists:
1)
2)