Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

39
Raising Standards For Academic Success Glenn Hills Middle School Faculty Meeting 2008 Glenn H. Andrews, Principal Kimberly Davis, Assistant Principal Gordon Holley, Assistant Principal To provide academic and social development for all students by ensuring a positive experience to better prepare them for success at the high school level. Vision Mission

Transcript of Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Page 1: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Raising Standards For Academic Success

Glenn Hills Middle School

Faculty Meeting 2008

Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant

PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant

Principal

To provide academic and social development for all students by

ensuring a positive experience to better prepare them for success at the

high school level.

Vision

Mission

Page 2: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Leadership Standard (1): The principal and school administrators provide leadership that reinforces a commitment to high expectations for student achievement while promoting the school as a true community of learning.

Raising Standards For Academic Success

Page 3: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Leadership Standard (L 4.3) School Leadership

Team Data-Driven

Raising Standards For Academic Success

Page 4: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Planning & Organization Standard (1): A current school vision and mission are the basis for all aspects of continuous improvement.

All stakeholders within the learning community have achieved consensus regarding their shared sense of vision and mission, which serves as the basis for all facets of the continuous improvement process.

Page 5: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Framework Assessment Data

Results & Review

Gordon Holley, Assistant Principal

Page 6: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Student Retention Data

Summary & Review

Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant

PrincipalDarryl Dunn, Graduation Coach

Page 7: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Assessment Standard (1): A cohesive and comprehensive system is in place to ensure that all administrators and instructional personnel use assessment data to design and adjust instruction to maximize student achievement.

Raising Standards For Academic Success

Page 8: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Variables Affecting Graduation Rates

EthnicitySocial Economic Demographics

# of Retention# Passed CRCT/Failed Content# Passed Content/Failed CRCT

# of Elementary School Attended# of Absences

Variables Affecting Graduation Rates

Ethnicity# of Retentions

Ages# Failed CRCT/Passed Content# Failed Content/Passed CRCT

# of Absences

Variables Affecting Graduation Rates

Ethnicity# of Retentions Prior to 9th Grade

Ages @ Ninth GradeFailed EOCT

Fee

der

Pat

tern

s

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Page 9: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Retention Data128 Student were retained prior to middle

school.103 retained students receive free lunch 80%7 retained students receive reduced lunch 6%18 retained students pay for lunch 14%

46 8th grade students41 7th grade students41 6th grade students

Page 10: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Retention Data78 Black Males 61%4 White Males 3%44 Black Females 34%2 White Females 1.5%2 Hispanic Females 1.5 %1 Asian Female .78%

Page 11: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Retention Data73 passed the CRCT for three years in a row

57% 6th through 8th grade Lexile scores 665-110023 600-69930 700-79921 800-89916 900-9991 1000-10993 1100+

Page 12: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Student w/Disabilities Summary Report

Student body 704 SWD 6666/704*100= 9.375 % of the student body is

SWD# of Students who have been retained 128% of student body 18.18 %# of retained students who are SWD = 21% of SWDS retained 21/66*100 31.81%SLD 6 OHI 3 MIID 3 EBD 7 AUT 2

Page 13: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Retention SummaryMajority of students were retained once or

twice

They were retained in 1st through 3rd grade mostly

The biggest trend was the higher the number of elementary schools students attended the higher chance of retention.

Students attended 3-6 schools on average.

Page 14: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Discipline Referral Review

Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalGordon Holley, Assistant Principal

Page 15: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Discipline Referrals to dateDiscipline 2008-2009

0

95136

267

359

497

572

688747

812

0 10 28 52 63 75

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

11-Aug

18-Aug

25-Aug

1-Sep

8-Sep

15-Sep

22-Sep

29-Sep

6-Oct

13-Oct

20-Oct

27-Oct

3-Nov

10-Nov

17-Nov

24-Nov

1-Dec

8-Dec

15-Dec

22-Dec

29-Dec

Refe

rral

s

2007-2008 0 95 136 267 359 497 572 688 747 812

2008-2009 0 10 28 52 63 75

11-Aug 31-Aug 11-Sep 30-Sep 11-Oct 31-Oct 11-Nov 30-Nov 11-Dec 31-Dec

Page 16: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Problem Behavior Report

Page 17: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Referrals by Grade Level

Page 18: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Location of Referrals

Page 19: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Triangle

Page 20: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Student Attendance 08/11/2008 through 10/18/2008 Attendance Frequency: Full-day Absent Half-day Absent Tardy Number % Total Number % Total Number % Total Monday 177 17.4 1 2.3 135 22.8 Tuesday 217 21.4 6 13.9 135 22.8 Wednesday 196 19.3 18 41.8 111 18.7 Thursday 180 17.7 17 39.5 107 18.1 Friday 243 23.9 1 2.3 103 17.4 ------------------ ------------------ ----------------- Totals 1,013 100.0 43 100.0 591 100.0

Page 21: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Number of Students with Absences

# Days Absent Tardy

1.0 154 124 2.0 92 52 3.0 39 27 4.0 38 13 5.0 22 9 6.0 8 8 7.0 2 4 8.0 8 2 9.0 1 3 10.0 5 none 11.0 1 1 12.0 2 2 16.0 1 1 17.0 1 none 20.0 1 none 25.0 1 none

Page 22: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Protocols

Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant Principal

Grade Level Teams

Glenn Hills Middle School

Page 23: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Pyramids of InterventionProtocols

Gordon Holley, Assistant Principal

Page 24: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 25: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 26: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 27: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 28: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 29: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008
Page 30: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Raising Standard Rollout

Instructional Framework

Kimberly Davis, Assistant Principal

Elizabeth Arnette, ELA CoachLarina Thomas, Math Coach

Page 31: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Team Sick Personal Professional Staff Development

Total

Clemson 10 3 4 4.5 21.5GA Southern

6 9.5 15.5Augusta State

43 4 47SC State 16 2 6 24Paine 11.5 2 6.5 20Tuskegee 5 1 5 11GA Tech 5.5 4 2 5 16.5UGA 9 2.5 11.5U of Tennessee

5 3 2 7.5 17.5Connections

26.5 7 2 4 39.5Total 137 20 12 53.5 224.75

Page 32: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Grade Level Total # of Students

Total # of Honor

Students

% of Totals

6th Grade 226 Students

38 Students

17%

7th Grade 216 Students

30 Students

14%

8th Grade 264 Students

39 Students

15%

Totals 706 Students

107 Students

15%15% of total student population made the (A) or (AB) honor roll.

Page 33: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Teams Names Number of F’s

Clemson University 15 Total

Georgia Southern 19 Total

Paine College 17 Total

SC State University 31 Total

Augusta State 42 Total

Tuskegee University 71 Total

Univ. of Tennessee 42 Total

Georgia Tech. 11 Total

University of Georgia 52 Total

Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!

Page 34: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Grade Levels

Total # of Students

Total # of Failures

% of Totals

6th Grade 226 51 Total 22%

7th Grade 216 144 Total 67%

8th Grade 264 105 Total 38%

Totals 706 300 42%

42% of total student population has one or more (F)’s for the first nine weeks grading period.

Compromising Excellence Is Not An Option!

Page 35: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

SPED FAILURE LIST-1st Nine Weeks

GRADE TEAM LAST NAME  LANG

ARTS MATH SCIENCE S. S. Total

6 Student 1   X X X (40%) x 4

6 Student 2         (50%) x 1

               

               

7 Student 3     X X (35%)   2

7 Student 4   X x X (35%) X 4

7 Student 5     X X (65%)   2

7 Student 6   X   X (90%)   2

7 Student 7     X   ( 25%) X 2

7 Student 8   X       1

7 Student 9   X X   (15%) X 3

7 Student 10   X       1

7 Student 11     X X (75%)   2

7 Student 12       X (45%)   1

               

8 Student 13     X     1

8 Student 14   X     X 2

8 Student 15         X 1

8 Student 16   X       1

Page 36: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

6th Grade Standards Blitz

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Teachers

Perc

en

tag

e O

bserv

ed

9/12/08

10/15/08

Page 37: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

7th Grade Standards Blitz

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Teachers

Perc

en

tag

e O

bserv

ed

9/12/08

10/15/08

Page 38: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

8th Grade Standards Blitz

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Rollins

Jone

sSta

rk

Moo

re

Peter

son

& Glov

er

Faulk

Scott

& Mah

oney

Carpe

nter

Gordo

n

Sande

rs

Bowm

an

Forsto

n

Teachers

Per

cen

tag

e O

bse

rved

9/12/08

10/15/08

Page 39: Raising Standards Performance Review November 2008

Evaluation & Documentation

Professional Growth Plans

Glenn H. Andrews, PrincipalKimberly Davis, Assistant

principal