Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic
description
Transcript of Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic
![Page 1: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic
Basic parameters:
1) Transparency ~ 2 km vs. 40 m ice/water
2) Radio ‘coherence’ quadratic growth of signal power at >20 cm
wavelengths (vs. linear for optical/PMT)
3) Now extensive experience in situ (RICE) + 3 beam tests at SLAC by
GLUE/ANITA groups RMoliere
![Page 2: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Why believe radio?• Attenuation length in situ data
• Test beam data consistentcoherenceGHz
![Page 3: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• In situ absolute system gain calibration (~dE/E) using calibrated radio sources– RICE (gain error~3 dB)– ANITA (~ 0.5 dB)
• In situ reconstructed radio sources (Tx)
• Observation of =10 m radio coherence in coincidence w/ EAS (LOPES/KASCADE)– Signal strength~Allen formula (from 60’s)
![Page 4: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Lower bar for radio (optical/EAS)
AUGER, EUSO
-geometry of inclined shower detection VERY distinctive
Contained events better-reconstructed than events outside detector
![Page 5: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Efforts + Ideas• RICE, ANITA (In progress)
• LOPES, CODALEMA, South-Pole-effort-with-which-I’m-not-very-familiar (Jeff Peterson,CMU) – Air shower detection
• AURA, SALSA, ARIANNA– In planning/seed-funding
• ROAST + other stationary elevated options
• Europa (3-10 km thick ice [+salts and/or sulfuric acid] @ 91 K)
• Surface Wave coupling of radio waves (evanescent solutions of Maxwell’s eqns.)
![Page 6: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In-Progress EffortsExpt Threshold N(element) Comment
RICE 100 PeV 20 (dipole) 1999-
ANITA 10 EeV 40 (dual-pol horn)
45-day flight, 06-07
AURA (Gary Varner WG)
100 PeV 36 cluster x 4/cluster
$1M proposal @NSF now
SALSA 100 PeV 14000 Site studies
ARIANNA (Ross Ice Shelf)
10 PeV 10000 Start-up $ -12/06 msrmnt
LOPES/LOFAR/CODALEMA
100 PeV ~10-20 Large RFI backgrounds
![Page 7: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ANITA beam test (SLAC, June 2006)
RICE
![Page 8: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ARIANNA – ice characterization 06-07 (steve barwick talk)
![Page 9: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Air shower detection of EAS (Heino Falcke, plenary)
Threshold~100 PeV, LOPES must be externally triggered by ground detectors.
5 highly inclined events in 2004 data.
![Page 10: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SALSA
![Page 11: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Salt
• Experimental site on continental US?
• Surface layer+water ‘insulating barrier’, but:
• Uncertain salt properties, site-to-site
• Lab measurements encouraging but not fully fleshed out (Latten~50 m 1 km)
• High Drilling Costs – (~1M/hole vs. 50K/12 cm, 1 km deep hole at Pole)
![Page 12: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Upper limits (Saltzberg)
![Page 13: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Upper limits (Hussain)
Cautions: 1) presented upper limits can `float’ horizontally (no energy resolution), 2) different model parameters used for different modes, 3) 90% vs. 95% C.L. limits, 4) results depend on binning
![Page 14: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Do we need multiple radio expts?
• Threshold~experimental scale (coincidence trigger requirement)– 1013 eV threshold (104 elements, 20 m spacing,
surface array [Greenland]) viewing upcoming Sgr*A neutrinos
– 100 m spacingDense packed expt (RICE, e.g.); showers typically several km distant1017 eV
– 38 km height; showers typically 100 km distant1019 eV threshold (ANITA)
![Page 15: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Atm. Nu:IceCube = X:radio; X NOT air showers
RICE ANITA
![Page 16: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PMT noise:IC=Thermal noise:radio• Band-limited response from noise ~ band-limited
response from signal• Probability for a false trigger in one N-sample
waveform~Nexp(-x2/22), assuming Gaussian noise spectrum, with x=trigger threshold criterion (2.5-sigma, e.g.).– GLUE/ANITAGaussian– RICEnon-Gaussian tails: x=5, N=8192P=0.03/channel– For a big array, thermal noise is statistically characterizable:
vertices cluster within array, with vertex distribution determined by coincidence window
– Caution: most expts. Operating very close to the ‘edge’!
![Page 17: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
RICE trigger rate(threshold)
![Page 18: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Trigger multiplicity vs. Reconstruction multiplicity
• Trigger: Minimum of 4-hits needed to solve ct0=(x,y,z)
– (quadratic ambiguity)
• (RICE) biggest problem = N ‘real’ hits + M `noise’ hits minimum hit multiplicity from 45 to `isolate’
noise hit via residuals, e.g.
![Page 19: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Acoustic compared to Radio
+)10 km Latten?
+) 20 khz-50 khz digitization and signal transmissioncan do all triggering/DAQ on surface with no high-frequency signal losses
+) Ray tracing insulates acoustic waves produced at surface from interior
+) No battle with RF backgrounds
0) both polarizations
-) 1/f noise forces threshold up to 1019 eV
BEST IF YOU CAN DO BOTH!
![Page 20: Radiowave shower detection (GV, also) – cf optical/acoustic](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062518/568148f7550346895db619f8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Secular* Grail: Simultaneous obs.!GZK evts / hybrid dector (c. 2010)
N.B: coincidences offer lower thresholds (50%?), enhanced event reconstruction (Justin Vandenbrouke WG talk tomorrow)
*(an obscure reference to local KS politics; not crucial to understanding talk as a whole)