Radiographic Risk Factors for Unfavourable Outcomes after ...
Transcript of Radiographic Risk Factors for Unfavourable Outcomes after ...
Radiographic Risk Factors for Unfavourable Outcomes after
Percutaneous Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy
at L4-5 LevelJong-chul Chung, MD, Eun-kyung Kim, RN, In-sun Jeong, RN,
Woo-sung Sun, MD, Byeong-wook Hwang, MD, PhD, Hyung-dong Kim, MD, PhD.
Department of Neurosurgery, Bumin Hospital, Busan, Korea
Backgrounds
• Endoscopic interlaminar approach is still more challenging above L4-5 level
• Endoscopic working sheath inserted in narrow interlaminar space can cause dysesthesia or motor weakness.
• This study investigated the radiographic variables related to the interlaminar working zone.
Radiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
Choi et al. 2006 Operative Neurosurgery
Materials : PEILD at L4-5 levelRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
• Fully endoscopic interlaminar approach– FHD Rigid scope (OD 6.3mm, WchD 3.7mm, OA 30º, WL 125mm, TL 205mm )– Ligamentum flavum splitted and spared– Except for cases with laminotomy
• Jan.2015 – Jul.2016• 34 patients (M:F = 23:11)• Mean age: 49.6 years (19-74)• Mean follow-up : 14.2 months (12-27)• Type of disc protrusion 6%
9%
26%
15%
44% sup.migration
huge rupture
inf.migration
central
paracentral
Methods : Plain radiographyRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
• ILH : Interlaminar space height on anteroposterior radiography• ILW : Interlaminar space width on anteroposterior radiography• ISDf : Interspinous distance of flexion lateral radiography • ISDe : Interspinous distance of extension lateral radiography• ISDd : distance difference between dynamic radiography
ISDf
ISDe
ISDd = IDSf - ISDe
FLEXION EXTENSION
ILH
ILW
AP
Methods : Computed tomographyRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
• SLA : Sublaminar angle of L4 level on sagittal CT image• ILDs : Interlaminar distance at ipsilateral lateral margin of dura on sagittal CT • ILDc : Interlaminar distance at ipsilateral lateral margin of dura on coronal CT
ILDc
ILDs
SLA
midlineparamedian
Results: OverallRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
• Pain score (VAS)
Ave VAS leg 7.7(6-10) → 2.2(1-5) Ave VAS back 3.9(0-8) → 2.1(0-5)
• Group I : Favorable outcome group• Group II : Unfavorable outcome group
– Persistent dysesthesia : 3 patients– Aggravated motor weakness : 2 patients
Group I Group II
Group I Group II
Results: IL height & widthRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
ILW
ILH
ILH
ILW
ILH (mm) 13.7±3.2 12.7±3.0ILW (mm) 23.1±3.7 20.5±6.3
※ P>.05
Results: IL height & widthRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
ISDf
ISDe
ISDd = IDSf - ISDe
FLEXION EXTENSION
ISDf ISDe ISDd
ISDd (mm) 9.4±4.3 3.3±2.5 P<.05 0.630 (95%CI, 0.933-0.996)
ISDf (mm) 14.4±4.9 9.1±3.2
ISDe (mm) 5.3±4.8 5.7±5.1
Results: IL distance, & SLARadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
ILDc
ILDs
SLA
midlineparamedian
ILDcILDsSLA
SLA ( º) 24.8±8.6 20.6±3.4
ILDc (mm) 9.2±2.9 5.4±3.1 P<.05 0.635 (95%CI, 0.408-0.989)
ILDs (mm) 10.3±2.9 7.7±4.2
DiscussionRadiographic risk factor for unfavorable outcome after PIELD at L4-5. Chung et al.
• L45 interalminar space can be widened in flexion position.
• ISDd, and ILDc were significant parameters for planning PIELD.
• In cases of narrower and unexpandable interlaminar space, laminotomy or laminoplasty by advanced endoscopic instruments should be required.
ISDf
ISDe
ISDd = IDSf - ISDe
FLEXION EXTENSION
ILDc
paramedian