Radiative Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities
description
Transcript of Radiative Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities
Radiative Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities
Emmanuel Jacquet (ISIMA 2010)
Mentor: Mark Krumholz (UCSC)
Outline
I. Introduction and motivation
II. Fundamentals and generalities
III. The (very) optically thin limit
IV. The (very) optically thick limit
V. Conclusion
I. Introduction and motivation
Classical Rayleigh-Taylor instability
• Two immiscible liquids in a gravity field
• If denser fluid above unstable (fingers).
Motivation 1: massive star formation
• Radiation force/gravity ~ Luminosity/Mass of star.
• >1 for M>~20-30 solar masses.
• But accretion goes on… (Krumholz et al. 2009) : radiation flows around dense fingers.
Motivation 2: HII regions
• Neutral H swept by ionized H
• Radiative flux in the ionized region RT instabilities?
And more!
II. Fundamentals and generalities
The general setting
Width Δz of interfaceignored.
z=0+- - - -z=0-
Equations of non-relativistic RHD
gas
Radiation
Rate of 4-momentum transfer from radiation to matter
Energy
Momentum
Linear analysis: the program (1/2)• Dynamical equations:
• Perturbation:
• Search for eigenmodes:
• Eulerian perturbation of a quantity Q:
• If Im(ω) > 0: instability!
• Lagrangian perturbation:
Linear analysis: the program (2/2)
• Perturbation equations still contain z derivatives:
• Everything determined at z=0 so should dispersion relation.
• Importance of boundary conditions.
Boundary conditions
• Normal flux continuity at interface in its rest frame:
• From momentum flux continuity:
• Perturbations vanish at infinity.
z>0
z<0
≈ 0
III. The (very) optically thin limit
Absorption and reradiation in an optically thin medium
• Higher opacity for UV photons dominate force
Radiative equilibrium
Hard photon attenuation
visible near infrared
So we should solve:
Let us simplify…
with:
?
Isothermal media with a chemical discontinuity
• Discontinuity in sound speed.• Assume ρ-independent opacity and constant
F in each region
constant T and effective gravity field:
• Constant 2x2 matrix A:
eff
Instability criterion
• (Pure) instability condition:
• Dispersion relation:
• Growth rates:
Ex. ofunstableconfiguration
with:
1
2
IV. The (very) optically thick limit
Optically thick limit
• Radiation Planckian at gas T (LTE)
• Radiation conduction approximation.
• Total (non-mechanical) energy equation:
• Conditions:
Meet A again:
with:
Adiabatic approximation
• Rewrite energy equation as:
• If we neglect Δs=0.
• …under some condition:
with
« Reduced » set of equations
with:
Perturbations evanescent on a scale height
• A traceless must be eigenmode of A:
• Pressure continuity:
Rarefied lower medium
• Dispersion relation: in full:
• In essence:
• Really a bona fide Rayleigh-Taylor instability!
Unstable if g>0
Domain of validity
Not local
Not adiabatic
No temperature locking
Not optically
thick
E=x=1
Window if:
Convective instability?
So what about massive star formation?• Flux may be too high for
« adiabatic RTI »
• But if acoustic waves unstable : « (RHD) photon bubbles » (Blaes & Socrates 2003)
• In dense flux-poor regions, « adiabatic RTI » takes over.
growth time a/g (i.e. 1-10 ka).
• Tentative only…
Summary: role of radiation in Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities & Co.
Characteristic length/photon mean free path
1
OPTICALLY THICKOPTICALLY THIN adiabaticisothermal
<< 1 >> 1
Radiation modifies EOS, with radiation force lumped in pressure gradient
Radiation as effective gravity(« equivalence principle violating »)
Flux sips in rarefied regions: buoyant photon bubbles (e.g. Blaes & Socrates 2003)