R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna...

27
R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006

Transcript of R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna...

Page 1: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

R E P O R T

Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries

Anna KiełbAnna WalkowiakMaria Płóciennik

Koszalin, 2006

Page 2: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Institutions taking part in the project

1. Centrum Edukacji Nauczycieli w Koszalinie (Poland) – co-ordinator

2. Centro de Profesore de Recursos de Talavera (Spain) – partner

3. Centro de Profesore de Recursos de Tomelloso (Spain) – partner

4. Pedagogiko Insituto Kyprou (Cyprus) – partner

5. Rigas Rajona Pademes Izglibas un Kultura Parvalde (Latvia) – partner

Page 3: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

RESEARCH TARGETS

• Essential direction of educational activities in partner countries.

• Teachers’ reasons for taking up in-service training or other forms of development

• Criteria influencing the choice of a defined form.• Preferable forms, placed and dates of development.• Expectations concerning the results of the development

forms.

Page 4: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

RESEARCH TOOLS

The questionnaire contains metric in which teachers defined the type of educational institution they work in their status (this element appeared only in the Polish) years in occupation function teachers take up

The questionnaire contains 7 multiple choice questions, out of which teachers were asked to choose 2. In the first4 questions they could also add their own suggestions or ideas not listed.In partner countries it was possible to change some of thequestions.

Page 5: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Questionnaire was mailed to a representative number

of schools (104) of all levels ie. pre-primary, primary,

secondary (gymnasium, lyceum) and technical education.

Return rates were considered satisfactory. Of the 1497

questionnaires that 765 were returned (51%).

ORGANISATION OF THE RESEARCHIn Cyprus

Page 6: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

ORGANISATION OF THE RESEARCHIn Latvia

In Latvia the questionnaire with a request to participate

was sent to all 52 schools in Riga District (625 respondents).

It was sent in electronic version.

Page 7: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

ORGANISATION OF THE RESEARCHIn Tomelloso in Spain

In-Service Teacher Training Centre of Tomelloso covers 497 questionnaires were collected (61% of the total). Out of that figure, only 444 questionnaires were processed.

Page 8: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

ORGANISATION OF THE RESEARCHIn Talavera de la Reina in Spain

It was distributed to all the area, including pre-primary,

primary, special education, secondary and private

(concertados) schools. 708 teachers answered the

questionnaire.

Page 9: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

ORGANISATION OF THE RESEARCHIn Poland

We put an on-line questionnaire on CEN’s

web side www.cen.edu.pl 532 teachers filled

in the questionnaire.

Page 10: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

8%

21%

27%

21%

13%

19%

40% 41%

0%0% 0% 0% 0%

23%

36%

18%

9%

46%

19%

3%

23% 23%

Pre-primary primary school junior secondaryschool

high secondaryschool

other school no information

CYPRUS TOMELLOSO LATVIA TALAVERA POLAND

Respondents according to the type of school they work in

Page 11: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Respondents according to the years in teaching profession

25%

2%

38%

23%

18%

0%

42%

0%

19%

27%

0%

43%

3%

25%

19%

29%

21%

6%

20%

32% 29%

25%28%

19%

7%

0-3 years 4-10 years 11-20 years 21+ no information

CYPRUS TOMELLOSO LATVIA TALAVERA POLAND

Page 12: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

80%

16%

4%

59%

13%

28%

76%

11%13%

81%

10% 9%

77%

15%

8%

teachers School heads others

CYPRUS TOMELLOSO LATVIA TALAVERA POLAND

According to the professional status

Page 13: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Results of research

In the first part of the questionnaire teachers were asked which direction of activities is believed to be a priority in their schools / institutions. Respondents could choose 2 out of l6 listed suggestions (in Cyprus 4 out of 18 suggestions).The following table shows the five most commonly chosen answers in partner countries.

Page 14: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

1.Which direction of activities are believed to be prior in your school?

In all partner countries the following options were chosen: Supporting students motivation for learning Improving quality of education

In 3 countries teachers also pointed out:(Cyprus, Talavera, Tomelloso) Promoting use of computer and informative

techniques

In 2 countries teachers fund the following to be a priority in their schools: Introducing new methods and forms of teaching Preventing school failures Improving foreign language skills Promoting integration of pupils with special educational needs

Page 15: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

1.Which direction of activities are believed to be prior in your school?

It is also important to show activities which are not

common in schools: shaping intercultural awareness stressing European dimension of education promoting co-operation in education teaching national and civil awareness.

Page 16: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

2. What makes you decide about your own in-service training or development?

In all countries there are two main factors that decide about teachers’ own in- service training:

needs of the school I am working in

wanting to get better qualified

In four countriesteachers also pointed out: my own need to

develop

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Needs of the

school I am

working in

Chance for better

payment

The head’s

suggestion

My own need to

develop

Wanting to get

better-qualified

Chance to change

my job

Others

Cyprus Talavera Tomelloso Latvia Poland

Teachers in partner countries have very similar motivation for their own development.

Page 17: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

3.What is essential while choosing a form of in-service training?

In all partner countries

the most essential was

the subject of the

training.

In 4 countries it was also

the date of the training. 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Duration ofthe w orkshop

Opinion ofcolleagues

Date andplace of the

training

Lecturer Subject Others

Cyprus Talavera Tomelloso Latvia Poland

In 3 countries teachers also pointed out the importance of duration of the workshop and lecturer.

Page 18: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

4. What forms of in-service training do you prefer?

In three countries teachers pointed out: experience exchange workshops

In two countries: short – time courses qualification courses teaching body (only in Poland and in

Latvia)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Workshops Conferences Qualification

courses

Post-

graduate

studies

On-line

education

Individual

meetings in

the school

Teaching

Body

Experience

exange

short-time

courses

others

Cy prus Talav era Tomelloso Latv ia Poland

In all country on-line education is not that popular.Individual meetings in school are also not common

Page 19: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

5.Where should the training be held?

In all four countries

respondents think that

training should be held in the in-service

training centre in the school.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

In the school In the in-servicetraining centre

In a high school(academy,university..)

Any other localinstitution

Does not reallymatter

Cyprus Talavera Tomelloso Latvia Poland

For a big group of teachers it does not really matter.

Page 20: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

6. When should the training be held?

Teachers would like to have a special training leave, but such a possibility exists only in Latvia. Only Polish teachers want to be trained at the weekends as that is usually the case.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Weekend During holidays workdays in themorning

Workdays in theafternoon

During trainingholiday

Does not reallymatter

Cyprus Talavera Tomelloso Latvia Poland

The most preferable time chosen for teachers in 4 countries for their training are:•Work days in the morning (in working time periods), •workdays in the afternoon.

Page 21: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

7. What are your expectations concerning the effects of training?

The three most commonly pointed out answers are:

getting new skill improving knowledge exchange of experience

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Improvingknowledge

Getting newskills

Exchange ofexperience

Getting formalqualifications

Gettingadditional

qualifications

Editingarticles

Meeting newpeople

others

Cy prus Talav era Tomelloso Latv ia Poland

Less often teachers stressed:• getting additional qualifications (In Latvia and

Poland)• getting formal qualification

In Cyprus there were two additional answers chosen: •improvement of school practice•improving my students’ knowledge

Page 22: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Priorityof activities In schools

1. Supporting students motivation for learning 2. Improving quality of education3. Promoting use of computer and informative

techniques

Teachers’ motivation for their own training

1. Needs of the school I am working In2. Wanting to get better qualified3. My own need to develop

Criteria while choosing a training form

1. Experience exchange2. Workshops3. Short – time courses4. Qualification courses

The place of the training

1. In the in-service training centre2. In the school

Expectations 1. Getting new skill2. Improving knowledge3. Exchange of experience

Similarities

Page 23: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Differences

The only differences are mainly due to the way teachers’

training is organized in partner countries and they include: the choice of the form of the training day and time of the training

Page 24: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Teachers’ needs in the field of their own training and development should be diagnosed as this lets training centres plan their activities according to such expectations.

2. The comparative research and study have clearly shown that teachers’ needs are very similar as far as topics and organisation of training are concerned.

3. The differences that occurred while carrying on the research are due mainly to different teachers’ training systems in partner countries

Page 25: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

RECOMMENDATION

1. The priority activities in schools are the ones that support improvement of the quality of education and teachers' self-development and that’s why it’s a long-term activity. While attending any form of training teachers expect not only knowledge but also support to use new skills in school practice.

2. Supporting teachers’ and schools’ development should use and promote such forms of training that are based on teachers’ afterthought, everyday school practice, co-operation, consulting or research projects.

Page 26: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

RECOMMENDATION

3. Motivating students as a training topic should also be included in the list of activities planned by a training centre.

4. Teachers’ in-service training centres should have an easy access to innovations, research results, bibliography of all kinds, international exchange as teachers need to have new skills.

5. As far as teachers’ demands are concerned, any training should preferably be held on weekdays in the morning or during appointed training leave; teachers also find it possible to attend such trainings on weekdays in the afternoon.

Page 27: R E P O R T Diagnosis needs of teacher’s development forms in partner countries Anna Kiełb Anna Walkowiak Maria Płóciennik Koszalin, 2006.

Thank you very much