Quantum Dots Talking through a Quantum Wirehome.itp.ac.ru/~qd2010/Talks/Yudson_Talk.pdf · n)] ln 2...
Transcript of Quantum Dots Talking through a Quantum Wirehome.itp.ac.ru/~qd2010/Talks/Yudson_Talk.pdf · n)] ln 2...
Quantum Dots Talking through a Quantum Wire
Vladimir YudsonInstitute for Spectroscopy, RAS
Acknowledgments to: Igor Lerner and Igor Yurkevich
Support: RFBR 09-01235
September 23, 2010
“The Science of Nanostructures: New Frontiers in the Physics of Quantum Dots”
Chernogolovka, Russia
System:
Quantum Dots Coupled with a Wire
States of QDs become correlated
Limiting case: a Single Channel Wire + Single Level QDs
(spinless/spin polarized electrons)
1 2 N
x
jn
can be straightforwardly calculated for
non-interacting electrons
Quantities of interest:
averaged populations:
correlation functions:cljjl tntnttS )'()()'(
(depend on QD positions)
(equilibrium, non-equilibrium, quenches, etc.)
If not the interaction…
A Single Channel Wire with Interacting electrons (no interaction between QD’s and wire electrons)
A brief reminder: 1. LL + a single static impurity
)()(0 xUxU eff Kane & Fisher (92)
2. Luttinger Liquid + a single level QD
Furusaki & Matveev (02)
3. Chiral Luttinger Liquid + a single level QD
Lerner, V.Y., and Yurkevich (08)
6
Common wisdom:
e-e interaction:
Chiral Toy Model:
1 2 N
x
(only right movers)
]0)'()'()['(]0)()([2
10 xxxxVxxdx RRRR
The only effect – renormalization of Fermi-velocity: vvF
To begin with…
Non-interacting electrons(for comparison, notations, etc.)
Generating functional integral (for Matsubara technique):
],;,[];,[],[],[],[][
aaSJaaSS hybreaaDDJZ
)()]([)(];,[ jjjj
j
aJadJaaS
),(])[,(],[ xivxdxdS xF
)](),(),()([],;,[ jjjj
j
jhybr axxadtaaS
1
0
gpvi
ipgFn
n
1
),(0
8
QD action (after integration over wire electrons):
Extremely anisotropic disorder!
less anisotropic
Here:
1)0( jlG
)'(])',;,())(()'([)(];,[ 0
,
llljjjjjlj
lj
atxxgtJadJaaS
333231
2221
11
1)0(
)()(
0)(
00
)0(
iiiiii
iiii
ii
iG
nnn
nn
n
njl
|)(||)(|)( ljnljn xx
jl
xx
F
lj
njl eev
tti
F
j
jv
t
2
2
Some consequences:
jnEquilibrium populations do not depend on
positions of QDs (in contrast to the non-chiral model)
Triangular structure of the correlation function:
ljatnnTSnilj
R
jl
,0)]'()([)()0(
Example (two QDs), low-temperature limit:
22
0
22
0
2
0
2
/)(2
2121
)(ln
2
1
)()( 12
i
iie
iS FvxxiR
Accounting for interaction
(Grishin, Yurkevich, & Lerner (04))
)(1
02
1
02
1 idxdVdxd
eDeVdxd
1. H-S decoupling:
2. Gauge transformation: ii ee ;
Fermionic action:
),()],()[,(];,[ xxiivxdxdS xF
3. Accounting for the Jacobian: 1
0
11
0 VVV
][ xFiv
Bosonic field correlation functions (for the toy
model):
QDs functional (after integration over wire electrons):
];;,[][ ],[][][ JaaSS eaaDeDJZ
)'(])',;,(
))(()'([)(];,[
)',(
0
),(
,
ll
xi
lj
xi
j
jjjlj
lj
atexxget
JadJaaS
lj
))((),(),( 0
qvivqi
Viqiq
Fnn
nn
gvv
Vvv F
F
F
01
Constv
vF )()( 0
vvljS
xi
lj
xi
lj F
lj xxgexxgexxg
)]',;,([)',;,()',;,( 0
][
)',(
0
),(
)()'(
)()'(ln)]',(),([
2
1 2
lj
ljF
ljxxiv
xxivxx
In low-temperature limit:
I. Wire Green’s function for the chiral model:
)]()'([2
1)',;,(0
ljF
ljxxiv
xxg
As a result, DOS of the “chiral toy model”:
The “toy model” is not the Luttinger Liquid
(“Common wisdom”)
II. One QD coupled with a toy chiral mode:
][
)'()',0;,0()(' )',0(0
),0(2
S
aegetadd lii
e
In the n-th order of a formal expansion
v
vn F
nn ln)]'(...)'()(...)([2
1 2
11
Exactly as many as required to renormalize the product
of n bare Green’s functions!
Resume:
A system of a single QD coupled to an toy chiral mode
is trivial (the only effect: )vvF
III. Several QD’s coupled with a chiral mode:
][
)'()',;,()(')',(
0
),(2
S
aexxgetadd llxi
ljjxi
j
e
Already in the 2nd order of a formal expansion
)()''(
)()''(lnln
)()(
)()(lnln
)()'(
)()'(ln
)()'(
)()'(ln
)]',()',(),()([2
1
2121
2121
2121
2121
1222
1222
2111
2111
2
21122211
xxiv
xxiv
v
v
xxiv
xxiv
v
v
xxiv
xxiv
xxiv
xxiv
xxxx
FFFF
FF
Too many terms!
System of several QD coupled to an interacting toy
chiral mode is apparently “non-trivial”.
In fact, this is the property of the chiral model itself:
averaging of a product of several Green’s functions over
bosons generates more additional factors than the
number of Green’s functions.
In case of the chiral toy model, cancellation of extra
terms might be provided by an “almost complete”
vanishing of point interaction effects for a single mode.
For the chiral Luttinger model (two types of movers) no
cancellation is expected.
System of several QDs coupled with a chiral mode
needs a proper field-theoretical treatment.
One of ways – a gauge transformation in QD action.
Gauge transformation in QD’s action:
)'(])',;,(
))(()'([)(];,[
)',(
0
),(
,
ll
xi
lj
xi
j
jjjlj
lj
atexxget
JadJaaS
lj
j
xi
j
xi
jj aeaeaa jj ),(),(;
)()],([)(];,[ 1
0 jjj
j
axGadJaaS
Transformed action:
Correlations of bosonic field
)]([][||2),(),(/|)(|/|)(|
ljn
vxxvxx
nnlnj xxeeiqAiqA Fljnljn
:),()( jj xA
(for the toy chiral model with only right movers)
Correlations of bosonic field
)()],([)(];,[ 1
0 jjj
j
axGadJaaS
:),()( jj xA
}2
)(2)]([
)(2)]([{
||),(),(
/|)(|
22
/|)(|
/|)(|0
vxx
F
Fvxx
F
Fljn
vxx
F
Fljn
nnlnj
ljnljn
ljn
evv
vve
vv
vvxx
evv
vvxx
v
ViqAiqA
Correlators of bosonic field for chiral
Luttinger model (both right and left interacting movers):
Lowest order (in ).0V
vr
F
Fvr
F
Fn
nnn
nn evv
vve
vv
vv
v
ViqAiqA
/
22
/012
2
)(2][),(),(
2 1)()(),( 2121 nnn iGi
0)]'()([)(
,0)]'()([)(
)0(2112
)0(1221
n
n
i
R
i
R
nnTS
nnTS
Summary
1. System of several QDs coupled with a single chiral
branch of an interacting electron wire allows a simpler
(as compared to coupling with the both branches)
analysis with the use of a gauge field in the QD’s action.
2. This allows one to develop a perturbation theory in the
gauge field to calculate various correlation functions of
QDs.
3. The triangular structure of Green’s functions and
correlation function of population in different QDs is
preserved for the chiral LL in the first order in
interaction (at least).
20
Thank you!