Quantitative Data Analysis
-
Upload
sean-mcgowan -
Category
Documents
-
view
49 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Quantitative Data Analysis
![Page 1: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quantitative Research
The Vivint Experience
Sean McGowan
![Page 2: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Survey Results Included in this section is a compilation of our findings, an analysis of the data collected, and what this means for Vivint. We have also made suggestions for your organization based on research that will improve the quality of service provided and strengthen the overall relationship with your customers. Graphs and charts offer visual support of the data at hand and are complimented by detailed explanations of each item. To make these findings clear and simple, the results are separated into two areas: “Contact Methods” and “The Vivint Experience.”
Contact Methods General One of the first and most important questions in the survey asked which method/s the customer used when trying to solve their problem/issue with Vivint. The results revealed that approximately 8 in 10 acted by calling the company. As seen in Figure 1.1, phone is the preferred method of choice for Vivint customers.
What method did you use when trying to solve your problem/issue with Vivint? (Select all that apply)
Figure 1.1
Naturally, the most desired form of communication is person-‐to-‐person, and people are most likely to first pick up a phone so they can speak to a real person. The results above can also suggest that customers sought aid via another communication channel, such as email or the company website, and did not receive adequate assistance. After feeling the alternative methods were ineffective, they proceeded to call a Customer Service Representative (CSR). This calls for improvements and adjustments in the other methods used to serve the customer. Suggestions: This section makes clear the average Vivint customer will contact the company by phone and offers ways to use this channel to make the others more effective. When the customer calls Vivint, a voice-‐automated service should first remind them to seek immediate help via another communication channel. For example, it should invite them to search Vivint’s website for their issue or to use the company’s chat service, which the survey showed is effective but underutilized. The CSR should also ask
![Page 3: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
the customer if he/she used another method before making the phone call and how that method failed at providing optimum assistance. Results should be collected and used to make improvements by adding or correcting current instructions or modifying the email/chat system. Website The company website received some critical reviews from survey participants. They were asked simply if the site was helpful in solving the customer’s question/issue. More than 60% of respondents felt it was unhelpful. Figure 1.2 depicts these findings.
Was the website helpful in solving your question/issue?
Figure 1.2
Those who answered this question were asked to explain why they felt the website was unhelpful. Here are some of the explanations given by survey participants:
• Too hard to navigate • Did not offer desired service/feature as an option • Too technical • Did not like using your website
Greater than half of total customers that seek aid on the website are not able to resolve their concerns there. This could be simply because their problem is not mentioned on the website. However, we can assume that customers have many of the same needs and seek similar help online. This suggests that finding the right place or locating the right information may be the issue. Does the user have to click too many times before finding the help he/she is seeking? Are the headings or labels difficult to decipher to the point that the customer gives up quickly and picks up a phone instead? These are important things to consider and look into resolving. Suggestions: Although a majority of customers feel their problem was not helped via the website, small enhancements could change their overall experience into a positive one and help future users of the site. Rather than send an email, there could be a simpler, less personal way to leave feedback or suggest a new problem as an option that currently isn’t there. Customers may feel it too much of a hassle when the email path opens up another window and causes more work than they desired. You may also consider listing the “Chat Support” option under the “Need More Help?” section at the bottom of the support page. That way customers are aware of another alternative they can choose. These modifications will help customers feel their feedback or proposals are valued and that Vivint sincerely desires to serve them and provide easy and effective assistance.
![Page 4: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Email Customers that sought help via email had mixed responses to the quality of service they received. As shown in Figure 1.3, a majority of users felt they did not receive a response in a reasonable amount of time. A good amount of them also felt the response they got seemed scripted, generic, or impersonal. This comes off extremely negative to the customer. The responses were generally found to be ineffective and unhelpful, which suggests that either the response was not tailored to the customer’s specific issue and was a generic response, or that the CSR did not properly deal with the customer and serve them completely. Results of another survey question showed that 26% of those that used the email method had to speak with two or more representatives, and that 37% of the problems handled via email were not resolved.
To what extent do you agree with the following statements about your email experience?
Figure 1.3
Suggestions: Establish a required response time in the email database. If a CSR has not responded to an email within a specified amount of time, have an automated response sent to the customer to alert them that their case will be responded to soon. In the email, remind them of the options to chat online or look for their problem on the Vivint website. Also, take measures to make sure the responses are far from generic to avoid losing the trust and respect of the customer. Finally, CSRs should be trained to not only respond quickly, but with information that will actually help the one seeking assistance. While timeliness is critical, the aid customers seek is more important and should not be overlooked. A little bit of extra time is ok if the response provided will be more effective at resolving the concern.
![Page 5: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Chat A mere 6% of those surveyed used the company’s web chat service. The overall quality of service given by those over chat support far exceeded that of any other help channel. Figure 1.4 shows how the average experience over chat proved to be positive to the customer almost every time.
Please rate your most recent interaction on the following criteria. My Vivint chat representative was…
# Question Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree
Agree Total Responses Mean
1 Professional 1 2 11 14 2.71
2 Knowledgeable
about the product/issue
2 1 11 14 2.64
3 Efficient in solving the problem
2 0 12 14 2.71
4 Responsive 2 0 12 14 2.71 5 Respectful 1 0 13 14 2.86 6 Timely 1 1 12 14 2.79 7 Personable 1 3 10 14 2.64
Figure 1.4 These results were more than just “not negative” regarding the experience over chat. They were overwhelmingly positive. Across the board, the CSR proved to have favorable marks in every category almost every time. Most importantly, responses showed that 73% of problems were solved by the first representative spoken to via chat support. There was rarely a second or third representative involved in the process. The problem was resolved in nearly every instance by someone that increased the customer’s confidence in Vivint, on the first attempt. Something is clearly being done right by those in charge of the chat support group. Suggestions: As statistically the most effective and under-‐utilized method of getting assistance for Vivint customers, more should be done to get people to use this feature. As this channel proved to be a positive experience for those that used it, it would give many others a positive perception of the company and help Vivint avoid unwanted negative experiences with customer service, as a majority of them have been, according to results gathered. Chat support should be highlighted on the company website. No matter where the user goes, it should be visible on screen. They must be drawn to select the option, and its existence must be extremely obvious to each customer seeking assistance. It should be a clear, natural choice.
![Page 6: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Phone Due to the fact that nearly 8 in every 10 Vivint customers will speak with someone over the phone about a problem/issue, this channel requires the most attention. Figure 1.5 shows customer experiences with representatives over the phone.
Please rate your most recent interaction on the following criteria. My Vivint phone representative was…
# Question Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree
Agree Total Responses Mean
1 Professional 8.59% 11.66% 79.75% 326 2.71
2 Knowledgeable about the product/issue
17.18% 14.72% 68.10% 326 2.51
3 Efficient in solving the problem
25.08% 15.90% 59.02% 327 2.34
4 Responsive 14.11% 15.34% 70.55% 326 2.56 5 Respectful 7.67% 10.12% 82.21% 326 2.75 6 Timely 16.10% 12.69% 71.21% 323 2.55 7 Personable 10.43% 16.87% 72.70% 326 2.62
Figure 1.5 As you can see, most customers gave favorable responses to those with whom they spoke. While there is still lots of room for improvement, the important element here lies within the heart of the table. Only 59% of customers that interacted with Vivint CSRs by phone felt that the representative was efficient in solving the problem. That is even less impressive of the already low percentage of representatives that appear knowledgeable about the product/issue. This shows that the level of politeness or professionalism of the CSR does not make up for the fact that they sometimes do not resolve customer concerns. Other findings revealed that approximately 22% of all customers that call speak with two or more representatives, and that in the end, about 1 in every 5 problems/issues is not resolved over the phone. While the CSR has good qualities which are noted by the customer, the average customer is not receiving sufficient help. When the phone continues to be the top method used for assistance by approximately 80% of customers seeking help, this lack of problem resolution is the leading factor in disappointed customers. Suggestions: Short of making sure representatives receive proper and sufficient training, greater efforts should be made to improve other methods of customer service, so that not so many customers have to call in. This occupies the representatives and forces them to focus on simply finishing each call. In turn they lose sight of the meaning of each call – not ending it as quickly as possible, but making sure the reason for the call was met, and ultimately that the problem was solved. Make customers more aware of the chat support option by posting it everywhere on the site and in other materials given to the customer. Come up with a way to track which CSR dealt with a specific customer’s issue, and offer incentives to the top-‐performing representatives that resolve a concern on the first try.
![Page 7: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Vivint Experience Important Correlations Correlation tests evaluate the relationship between two or more of the set responses given. The two shown here compare customers’ experiences with a specific element of Vivint customer service to their overall satisfaction level with the service provided. Website – Overall Response This first correlation test shows the comparison between the customer’s experience with the website and how that impacts their opinion of the company’s customer service. This has a big influence on the customer’s overall satisfaction with Vivint as a whole. As seen in Figure 2.1, the P-‐value (Pearson Correlation) is negative. A value less than .05 suggests a strong relationship between two sets of data, and this test produced negative values. This means the correlation between the two is direct and persuasive. The numbers highlighted below strongly indicate that the more difficult it is for a customer to receive a response to their issue on Vivint’s website, the more negative their experience and view of the organization. As stated in the aforementioned section on the website, steps must be taken to secure an effective website and ensure the customer a positive experience when they seek help online.
Website – Overall Response
How easy was it to find a
response to your
question/issue on the website?
Please choose the
response that relates best
to your experience with
Vivint customer service:
How easy was it to find a
response to your question/issue
on the website?
Pearson Correlation 1 -.472**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 80 77
Please choose the response that
relates best to your experience
with Vivint customer service:
Pearson Correlation -.472** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 77 354 Figure 2.1
![Page 8: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Number of Representatives Involved – Overall Reponse Another test shows the relation between the number of representatives spoken to with the overall satisfaction of the customer service experience. As illustrated in Figure 2.2, the P-‐value is once again lower than .05, and in particular a high negative value, which indicates the strength of these results. Due to these findings, it can be interpreted that the more representatives a customer must speak with before resolving their problem, the more negative they will feel towards their experience with Vivint customer service. Efficient customer service departments around the country seek to limit the number of “repeat contacts,” or the number of representatives a customer must speak with until they receive sufficient help with their issue. This is one huge element of any organization that contributes to either the positive or negative image of the company as a whole. Vivint must be proactive at reducing the number of repeat contacts in its customer service department.
Number of Representatives – Overall Response
Please choose the
response that relates best
to your experience with
Vivint customer service:
How many
representatives did you
speak with before your
problem was resolved?
Please choose the response
that relates best to your
experience with Vivint
customer service:
Pearson Correlation 1 -.650**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 354 25
How many representatives
did you speak with before
your problem was resolved?
Pearson Correlation -.650** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 25 27 Figure 2.2
![Page 9: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Field Service Professional A further look at the question on field service professions reveals an insightful element of the Vivint experience. On the surface, responses shown in Figure 2.3 to the question make it seem like there is only slight room for improvement. But only initially. Approximately 6 out of 10 customers felt that the service professional came within a reasonable amount of time after the request. That’s not too bad, but it could be better. About 7 out of 10 customers felt the service professional had their best interest in mind. These numbers aren’t quite red flags, but the response to the third question certainly is.
Please choose the response that relates best to your experience with Vivint customer service:
# Question Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Total
Responses Mean
1
The field service professional came within a reasonable amount of time after I called Vivint
17.65% 23.53% 58.82% 17 2.41
2 The field service professional seemed to have my best interest in mind
17.65% 11.76% 70.59% 17 2.53
3 The field service professional helped build my confidence in Vivint
29.41% 35.29% 35.29% 17 2.06
Figure 2.3 Roughly 65% of those that dealt with a field service professional felt that their confidence in Vivint grew as a result. What does this say? It means that arguably the most important interaction between the customer and the company falls far short of where it should be, in terms of leaving a lasting positive impression on the customer. When Vivint dispatches a field professional, this is the time to make a difference. This is the time to show the customer what Vivint is all about and leave them feeling assured that their investment in the company and its products was a good one, one that they’ll continue for years. Instead, they either have a negative encounter or one that isn’t special as it should be. Field service professionals must be a large force of good for the organization. They cannot merely treat their job as a simple visit or repair. They could bring the customer a small gift, such as a water bottle, a toy for a child, or a household appliance to improve the opinion of the company. They should be personable with the customer and show sincere desire to help, putting the customer first at all times. Further internal analysis of the field service process could go a long way at instilling confidence in Vivint customers through personal interaction with the professionals themselves.
![Page 10: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Net Promoter Score Despite unfavorable responses to questions throughout the survey and complaints about many different aspects of Vivint customer service, costumers are very likely to recommend the company to a friend or colleague. The Net Promoter Score is used to measure the overall satisfaction level of customers. Figure 2.4 shows that a majority of Vivint’s customers are extremely pleased with the service they have received. While most customers selected 5 or above as their likeliness to recommend Vivint to a friend, those that appear on the left of the graph should not be ignored.
How likely are you to recommend Vivint to a friend or colleague?
Figure 2.4
As referenced in Figure 2.5, the average person is very likely to recommend the company to someone else (7.79 out of 10). This indicates a strong, satisfactory opinion by most customers that responded.
Statistic Value Min Value 1 Max Value 11 Mean 7.79 Variance 14.67 Standard Deviation 3.83 Total Responses 413
Figure 2.5 Referring back to Figure 2.4 and noticing the more than 60 that selected “0 – Not likely at all” as an option, it should be noted that not everything is perfect and effective. There are some who have very negative views about Vivint that pose a threat to potential customers and current customers. Their concerns should be addressed and their input viewed just as much as the favorable responses. By following the suggestions given throughout this analysis section, the problems experienced by those who dislike Vivint and its customer service are likely to go away, and the company can win back some of the faithful customers it has lost due to poor customer service.
![Page 11: Quantitative Data Analysis](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022080223/55cf929c550346f57b98035e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SUMMARY The data presented here in Figure 2.6 show the overall responses of Vivint customer service. Almost a third of those who participated felt the service was less helpful than expected or desired. Less than 1 in every 5 customers felt they received more efficient help than they expected. Vivint cannot accept mediocrity as it looks to expand its presence and business around the United States.
Please choose the response that relates best to your experience with Vivint customer service: # Answer
Response %
1 It was less helpful than I expected
115 29%
2 It was as helpful as I expected
218 54%
3 It was more helpful than I expected
69 17%
Total 402 100% Figure 2.6
Approximately 45% of all customers that responded to this survey had interactions with Vivint customer service within the last month, which means customers have an increased chance of having a negative experience. This can easily impact their favorable view of the company and change it to a bad one. The 54% of customers that received service equal to their expectations reveals the potential at hand to not only improve the service offered to the customer and make their overall experience better, but ultimately to score thousands and thousands of loyal customers with a commitment to strengthen customer service. With the results discovered by the survey and the suggestions discussed and analyzed in this section above, Vivint can go above and beyond any security or home automation company and capture the business and respect of people around the country.