Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical...

13
Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue- mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han, Jiasong Li, Manmohan Singh, Chen Wu, Chih- hao Liu, Shang Wang, Rita Idugboe, Narendran Sudheendran, Michael D. Twa, and Kirill V. Larin Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston

Transcript of Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical...

Page 1: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-

mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical

modelsZhaolong Han, Jiasong Li, Manmohan Singh, Chen Wu, Chih-hao Liu,

Shang Wang, Rita Idugboe, Narendran Sudheendran, Michael D. Twa,

and Kirill V. Larin Department of Biomedical Engineering,

University of Houston

Page 2: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Outline

• Introduction• Methods• Results• Conclusion

Page 3: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Introduction• Assessing the biomechanical properties of tissues can help in

diagnostics of different diseases.

• Optical Coherence Elastography (OCE) is an emerging technique allowing noninvasive quantification of tissue biomechanical properties

• Quantification methods: shear wave equation (SWE); acoustic surface wave equation (SAE) ; lamb frequency equation (LFE); finite element method (FEM); gold standard: uniaxial compressional test.

Page 4: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Methods: OCE setup

OCE set up Phantom measurement

J. Li, et al, "Dynamic optical coherence tomography measurements of elastic wave propagation in tissue-mimicking phantoms and mouse cornea in vivo," J Biomed Opt 18(12), (2013).

Page 5: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Methods: SWE and SAE22 (1 ) gE c

32

2

2 (1 )

(0.87 1.12 ) gE c

SWE:

SAE:

g

E

c

Young's modulus

density

Possionratio

Group wave velocity

B. F. Kennedy, et al., "A Review of Optical Coherence Elastography: Fundamentals, Techniques and Prospects," IEEE J Sel Top Quant 20(2), (2014).

Page 6: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Methods: LFE

As there was no surface stress on the top and bottom boundaries of the phantoms, the anti-symmetric circular lamb wave mode was triggered.

2 2 2

2

tanh( ) ( )

tanh( ) 4

h k

h k

22 2

21

kc

2

2 222

kc

LFE:

Here c1 is the compressional wave (P-wave) velocity and c2 is the shear wave (S-wave) velocity.

J. Bao, "Lamb wave generation and detection with piezoelectric wafer active sensors," University of South Carolina (2003).

Page 7: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Methods: FEM

Displacement by OCE

Finite element model

Page 8: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Results: LFE vs OCE

LFE obtained Young’s modulus

The Young’s modulus by LFE are 25kPa for 1%, 55kPa for 1.5% and 160 kPa for 2% agar phantoms.

Page 9: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Results: FEM vs OCE

Group velocities by OCE Group velocities by FEM

By comparing on the group velocities, the Young’s modulus by FEM are 18kPa for 1%, 50kPa for 1.5% and 160 kPa for 2% agar phantoms.

Page 10: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Results: Compressional tests

Uniaxial compressional test

The Young’s modulus is calculated at strain=0.1.

Page 11: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Results: All

shear wave equation (SWE), surface acoustic wave equation (SAE), lamb-frequency equation (LFE), finite element method (FEM) and uniaxial mechanical compressional testing (mechanical testing)

Page 12: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Conclusions• Combining OCE with numerical analysis is a

promising method to quantitatively reconstruct elasticity.

• LFE and the FEM can extract the Young’s modulus with higher accuracy than other simplified models such as SWE and SAE.

• Future work will entail applying this method on tissues for noninvasive assessment of elasticity.

Page 13: Quantitative assessment of the biomechanical properties of tissue-mimicking phantoms by optical coherence elastography via numerical models Zhaolong Han,

Thank you!